HOW MANY MEGAPIXELS DO YOU NEED? YOU MAY BE SURPRISED!

Рет қаралды 530,350

Күн бұрын

Want to take amazing wildlife photos? Check out my new course with 20 modules and over 5 hours of content, no fluff!
journalofwildlifephotography....
Join me in Botswana in 2024!
www.simondentremont.com/botsw...
My name is Simon d'Entremont and I'm a professional wildlife and nature photographer from Eastern Canada.
Are you struggling trying to understand all the advice about the differences between high and low megapixel cameras? Not sure which you should buy? In this video I'll walk you through the differences, and clear up some common misunderstandings about them.
I use Topaz Labs software for noise reduction, sharpening and upscaling:
topazlabs.com/ref/1943/
My equipment:
Canon R5 body amzn.to/3UQeROc
Canon R6 body amzn.to/3RpYqVX
Canon R5 battery grip amzn.to/3dUrHKF
Canon 100-400 EF II amzn.to/3UQi4gJ
Canon 17-40 L lens amzn.to/3y71MGt
Canon RF 16mm f2.8 amzn.to/3EmPNJ1
FLM Tripod (CP 34 L4 II) and Levelling Head (HB 75) www.flmcanada.com?aff=sdentrem
Sigma Art 50mm f1.4 lens amzn.to/3fkRjAC
Sigma Art 20mm f1.4 lens amzn.to/3CjKto2
Rokinon 135mm f2 lens amzn.to/3SoB3x3
Sirui x-k40 ball head amzn.to/3E7Z5sc
Sirui lightweight Traveler 7C tripod with head amzn.to/3dS9Bca
Manfrotto Video Head amzn.to/3RlZie5
Wimberley Gimbal Head amzn.to/3flhya8
Jackery portable 240 lithium-ion battery amzn.to/3rCzX5r
ProGrade Gold 128 GB CF Express amzn.to/3fyx1nh
ProGrade Cobalt 325 GB CF Express amzn.to/3y3Ywf1
ProGrade Gold 256 GB SD amzn.to/3y0Xssg
Zoom H1n field recorder amzn.to/3Sozob9
Comica shotgun mic amzn.to/3REWN73
Rode Videomic NTG shotgun mic amzn.to/3BRlcQK
Rode Wireless GO II mic set amzn.to/3BUfIoh
Lenscoat neoprene camera bags amzn.to/3SNiqmz
Lencoat rain cover for 500mm F4 amzn.to/3SGtyl2
Falconeyes F7 LCD panel amzn.to/3y75z6F
Lowepro 450 AW large backpack amzn.to/3xZOHyL
Lowepro Flipside 300 small backpack amzn.to/3SOTWt7
Mindshift 36L (closest available) backpack amzn.to/3C0fagy
DJI Mavic Air 2S drone (flymore combo) amzn.to/3M9TuDL
B&W circular polarizer, 77mm amzn.to/3SKc6Mx
B&W 2 stop ND Filter amzn.to/3URyIN6
B&W 6 stop ND filter amzn.to/3y6gs8G
B&W 10 stop ND filter amzn.to/3fwRIjs
Nikon Monarch 5 8x42 binoculars amzn.to/3URprEz
Blackrapid retro-classic shoulder strap amzn.to/3y0wUHt
FjallRaven trekking pants amzn.to/3y77DeV
Heat 3 gloves (shell only) www.theheatcompany.com/en-us/...
Heat Company Merino Wool liners www.theheatcompany.com/en-us/...
HP Omen 17.3" performance laptop amzn.to/3BZ7w69
Synology NAS storage amzn.to/3BXfcWF
16 TB hard drives for NAS amzn.to/3LTdrOW
Music in intro: "Nicer", by Houses on the Hill. Find that, and other sound effects at Epidemic Sounds
share.epidemicsound.com/0fbndn
Follow me on:
Facebook / sdentrem
Instagram / simon.dentremont
VERO vero.co/simondentremont
Website www.simondentremont.com/

Пікірлер: 2 600

@simon_dentremont Жыл бұрын

What’s the largest print you’ve ever made and how many megapixels was the original? I’d love to know!

@BigBadLoneWolf Жыл бұрын

A2,45megapixels no cropping, no upsizing, shot with Nikon D850

@robertleeimages Жыл бұрын

The Milky way like in my profile photo printed as 24x16 inch from a little canon 200d. It's a blend of 3 truck light painted foregrounds with a 10 image stacked sky but only know it was 23.2mb

@peteanddrake4242 Жыл бұрын

This week, I printed a TIF from a 20MP 5DMII to 30x50 gallery wrap on canvas. The printer did use Topaz Gigapixel--so not sure how much that helped. There is no noticeable pixilation or noise on the final print which is of a freight train coming out of the fog. That's my largest print so far and will hang at Norfolk Southern office in Atlanta. Years ago I did a series of lily pad flower pictures that all got printed for a hotel chain (the boring pictures that hang in your hotel room:). Those were all shot on a 6MP original Canon Rebel and were enlarged to 16x20. I just looked at those files this morning and noticed they were all shot with a 100mm 2.8 Macro---lens makes a huge difference too:)

@cidercreekranch Жыл бұрын

24x20 of a deep crop taken with a D7100 with a 300mm f4 that was up-sampled. From me usual sitting position, 18=24" away, the hummingbird's is sharp enough.

@shovelrocker7102 Жыл бұрын

40x28 inch lake landscape, very little editing on lightroom nothing more. Olympus E-M1mk3 with 12-40mm f2,8 lens.

@NSA.Monitored.Device Жыл бұрын

I love how Simon beats technical gibberish with logic.🥰

@Boss80gb 6 ай бұрын

Yes 😂 😂 I agree,I inherited 2 really nice in excellent condition Nikon D-300 AND a Nikon D-90 Dslr's from after my Father passed away last year& I love them.Simon just saved me alot of money 😆 Because I was going to trade them in& get higher megapixel cam,BUT I did the same test Simon talks about& Me& a couple of friends an my lady don't see noticeable difference blur etc.As long as your not"breathing hot breath" 🤭all up close,its NOT huge difference! The average photographer doesn't need super megapixel cams.UNLESS they're really making massive posters etc* 12+mp is enough from both my cams and we've printed out poster sized pics an they're great looking.....Simon you are absolutely awesome,witty and very intelligent sir!Stay creative an we LOVE YOUR CHANNEL& YOUR ENTHUSIASTIC ENERGY!Thank you for all you do ✌🙏

@jnielsen1956 5 ай бұрын

14 minutes long?? I've seen this answered in 30 seconds on Kelby One.

@NSA.Monitored.Device 5 ай бұрын

@@jnielsen1956 Still you had to watch a 14 min vid.

@jnielsen1956 5 ай бұрын

@@NSA.Monitored.Device Ha, ha. No, I moved on after a minute and a half.

@NSA.Monitored.Device 5 ай бұрын

@@jnielsen1956Funny how you devaluate your "point" one way or another.^^

@aerialfilm1 Жыл бұрын

I recently visited the offices of a company I used to work for, and they still have several 18x24 photos hanging that I took in 2001 on a 3.1mp Canon D30. Back then I couldn’t imagine it how it could get any better.

@MicskiDK Жыл бұрын

I still have my D30. It takes brilliant photos with that 50 mm.

@USGrant21st Жыл бұрын

I had Canon D30 somewhere around 2000, the image quality was dismal compared to modern cameras. In fact the image quality was improving by leaps and bounds at that time, so every year the resolution was doubling and noise was reduced. I think in 5 years I had it, its price went down from $3000 to $300.

@alicevioleta3184 Жыл бұрын

until recently i was shooting on a nikon D50, which is "only" 6 megapixels. the photos it took were gorgeous, and it's a shame i had to replace it. i'm happy with my olympus om-d em10, of course, but "only" 6 megapixels is good enough in 2023.

@thothheartmaat2833 Жыл бұрын

i actually want that camera because it has the lowest noise of almost any camera..

@nadermansour7487 11 ай бұрын

Sony Mavica was my first camera. 0.6Mp. Great for candids because no one recognized it as a camera. People thought I was watching TV.

@bza2356 9 ай бұрын

When creating a billboard as a graphic designer, I was so nervous to see the outcome when learning it was 15dpi. They gave me a test cropped section of the picture bc I wanted to check colours and it looked like a blur.... When viewing it from across the street it was sharp as anything and so happy as it cost a lot to put up. I've never worked that big

@bza2356 9 ай бұрын

Hey Simon, Just found your channel and you're a great presenter. I go on a trip tomorrow in the Kimberleys (aus)... For landscapes is there any use for a 50mm prime lens or just go with a 18-85... I thought it would be fun to take a nice camera...

@jonfreeman9682 Ай бұрын

I do professional work and handle large format print and can say high DPI isn't needed. It also costs more to print and you'll never notice it.

@kevincozens6837 18 күн бұрын

It was interesting to see the upscaled duck eye at 9:57 looking sharper than either the 18MP or 3MP image.

@cathedralirish820 Жыл бұрын

I just found Simon’s video collection on YT. He speaks clearly, with some pace, and doesn’t include content that’s unrelated to the subject(s) of the video(s), staying “on task.” He provides tremendous clarity to what are generally pretty confusing topics. His videos are really, really well done, and his captured images, used in the videos, are quite impressive. I’m subscribing so I don’t miss future content. Thank you, Simon. 😊

@simon_dentremont Жыл бұрын

Too kind! Thanks!

@nigerianway 9 ай бұрын

The old man's not madly chasing views one of the best in the niche

@weiyeliu1968 23 күн бұрын

I decided to give you a LIKE right at this moment 04:26 "who looks at an image this large..from this close???" LOL

@timothy790110 22 сағат бұрын

as a 61 megapixel shooter, i absolutely love the cropping i can do, and the detail I can get. Its just so much elbow room.

@jupitereye4322 4 ай бұрын

I don't need megapixels, client needs them.

@antonroland Ай бұрын

Clients THINK they need them😉

@jonfreeman9682 Ай бұрын

If clients want them then give it to them. It depends on the job.

@DanaPushie 4 ай бұрын

I had to watch to this video again, some months later, to reassure myself that my Canon APS-C 24MP camera would meet my needs for the foreseeable future. I knew I would get clear, concise information; info I could trust. Thank you Simon. Best wishes to you and yours for 2024, from a fellow Bluenoser.

@simon_dentremont 4 ай бұрын

Go for it neighbor!

@staceyhunt6769 2 ай бұрын

My son (6) is autistic, and he takes photos of things to help him handle transitions or having to put away/eat things he isn't ready to part with. Currently he has to use his tablet but that has quite a lot of problems to it. We're hoping to get him a good, budget, older digital camera he can use instead. We brought one of those kid cameras a couple years back and it's so awful you can hardly tell what it is. 🙄 This video is really helping me understand what we need to get for him to get nice photos and hopefully grow his love for photography. :)

@charliehubbard4073 2 ай бұрын

In 2009, my wife and I took our honeymoon in Victoria, B.C. While there, I just happened to get a photo out over the water of a lighthouse on an island with a tall masted ship going by in the background. Truthfully, it's not a great photo, but we liked it, and it reminds us of our time there. The image was taken with a Canon 40D, which had, as I recall, a 10 MP sensor. Now I cropped the original image by about a factor of two in both axes, which means the end result only had 2.5 MP. We had that printed on canvas at 36 inches on the diagonal and it hangs on the wall of my wife's home office above a day bed. You don't view it closer than about 6 feet away. To my untrained amateur eye, it looks great!

@jonfreeman9682 Ай бұрын

Beautiful island and always enjoyed my visit there. It would be even more awesome if a humpback whale 🐳 graced the lighthouse background. But yeah even 10 MP photos are good enough for large prints. I worked for a large format printer and we'd print all sizes and generally the larger the print the lower the DPI needed. We've done prints from 20 years ago that's only 2 MP and with a bit of enhancements they still look great.

@nethbt 9 ай бұрын

In this day and age of 45 and 60 megapixels, the SWEET SPOT is still 24MP in my opinion....just the right file size, plenty of details, fast enough for slower cards, plenty of cropping headroom and won't degrade high ISO IQ that much

@badger67 Жыл бұрын

Great advice Simon. As a 12 MP shooter on my old Nikon D300s, I couldn't be happier.

@Adrian_Finn Жыл бұрын

Same here, also shooting Nikon D300s, great camera.

@johnhoward5248 Жыл бұрын

Same here, I love both of mine, one with the grip and one without. Love the controls on the outside. John

@markkeohane9850 Жыл бұрын

D300s is a terrific camera. A delight to shoot with and still turns out great images.

@dobrofool Жыл бұрын

I’m still shooting with the D300, D700, and FujiS5Pro (which was marketed as 12MP, but technically 1/2 that because of the pixel design of the sensor). All of these bodies continue to produce beautiful warm photos, with a color pallet seemingly lost as newer and “better” cameras made them extinct. Guys are swarming back to their digital roots in the D700, and are all saying the same thing: color, color, color! These old bodies deliver a film like feel with their images. We have printed 16x23 photos that look crazy beautiful. Most of my work is portraits, so these bodies will continue to be work horses until they give up the ghost.

@MaddyBee Жыл бұрын

@@dobrofool I have been loving using the s5 pro, I’ve been shooting the canon 5d classic for years and am enjoying the fun little Fuji.

@mawavoy Жыл бұрын

Simon, this is another high value video. Like all of your work, is comprehensive, accurate and presented in an easy to comprehend delivery. Thanks for both the information and the comprehensible presentation.

@jaakkotahtela123 Жыл бұрын

Would have been a high value video if it had been under 5 minutes. Now it was unnecessarily long

@mawavoy Жыл бұрын

@@jaakkotahtela123 , your comment is easy to make and even easier to think is correct only if you understand the concepts involved. If you knew the concepts before seeing the video then for you any length of time was wasted once you saw the complete video. On the other hand, if you knew nothing about the subject and only saw the conclusion you would know the answer but could never explain it to anybody, and thus would justifiably have little confidence in the answer. How do I know this? I have seen several presentations and only watched this one to the end precisely because I recognized and appreciated its value.

@simon_dentremont Жыл бұрын

Many thanks!

@doptimist Жыл бұрын

@@jaakkotahtela123🙄

@mawavoy Жыл бұрын

@@iridium8341 , the comments in the remainder of the thread says you are in the minority.

@brucegraner5901 3 күн бұрын

When I was a working press photographer I rarely made any prints bigger than 8x10. Upon retirement my pro gear went back to the paper and I was left with my personally owned Leica V-Lux 114, a great bridge camera, that I used to make videos for the paper's website. It has a one-inch sensor and I was trying my hand at wildlife photography. To test the limits of the camera I ordered a couple 20x30" prints. To my surprise the images held up very well, so well that when it came time to buy my own camera with interchangeable lenses I only moved up on sensor size to micro-four-thirds and have had no regrets.

@Guitar6ty 2 ай бұрын

Excellent presentation.

@simon_dentremont 2 ай бұрын

Thank you kindly!

@A-Z0-9463 10 ай бұрын

I did a shoot in 2013 with 18 megapixel camera and it was on 80 feet wide billboard..... It was looking tremendously sharp..... I used the viewing distance calculations and applied output sharpening technique in a very effective manner..... I'm glad that you made this vide as many many people are extreamly confused in megapixel war... Keep up great work

@TriggerTravels 3 ай бұрын

This man is an absolute genius!

@carrow2250 2 күн бұрын

That’s awesome. I like that you explained it mathematically.

@simon_dentremont 2 күн бұрын

Glad you liked it!

@theotterspotters Күн бұрын

I am relatively new to photography and was looking to invest in a nice mirrorless camera. Your video saved me a lot of money! More megapixels are stressed by sellers when, as you explained, for a lot of us, more megapixels doesn’t mean better. So instead of a 4$k Sony A7R5 I went with an older RIII and it suits my needs perfectly! Thanks for your clear and concise videos! I’ve been binging watching them all since buying my new camera.

@johnvandusen567 11 ай бұрын

I took up photography in 1970 when I joined the US Navy. I travelled all over the Mediterranean, Caribbean, etc. Even spent Christmas 1972 in Rome! I enjoyed your video very much.

@justinoff1 Жыл бұрын

I'm a commercial photographer who uses 100-200mp digital backs. The thing most people don't touch on is having the ability to make deep crops for the purpose of maintaining depth of field. I've shot automotive campaigns in studio for major manufacturers. When shooting a 3/4 angle it's necessary to pull the camera further away to have the car sharp bumper to bumper. You can only stop down so far until diffraction starts working against you. For professional commercial work more megapixels is always better. But you need to know how to use them correctly.

@BenAndrews 10 ай бұрын

I guess this will depend on whats available for your system but tilt shift lenses are made exactly for that purpose.

@casualcoffeeshooter 9 ай бұрын

@@BenAndrews tilt-shift lenses were made not for commercial photography, tbh. I'm sure that you can use them in that way, buy ususally they're less sharp and made for FF or cropped cameras. 100-200mp digital backs that were mentioned are Phase One, Hasselblad or Pentax ones and medium format only. There are no tilt-shift lenses for such big sensors on the market as far as I can remember

@BenAndrews 9 ай бұрын

@@casualcoffeeshooter of course there are tilt-shift lenses for medium format. I've used 2 of them. Not sure what brand, since I used them 15 years ago in the studio where I was studying photography. There are quite a few options. A number of bellows based options that are around, some are mated to a lens and some allow you to put on any lens you like in whatever system its designed for. A quick search on google shows Hasselblad make a tilt shit adapter. I suspect thats similar to one I used, since we shot our product photos on a Hass. Theres also the Fotodiox Pro ROKR adapters, and a bunch of bellows options. I own a Samyang tilt for canon and have adapted to fuji. Fujifilm GFX also has tilt shift options. Thats not cheap tilt shift and it covers the larger sensors and is adapted to some digital backs. Not a professional option though.

@ericmuetterties1984 9 ай бұрын

@@casualcoffeeshootersure there are. Hasselblad has an adapter or you put the back on a view camera

@luke-alex 5 ай бұрын

Wouldn't a longer focal length lens achieve the same effect without cropping? Or is your point that the higher pixel count saves you from needing another lens? In that case, it's a matter of redundancy; you have more pixels than you need, so that you can afford to lose some. I don't think the video is making the case that fewer pixels is better, just the the benefits of more pixels is more limited and specific than often assumed.

@evgenipoptoshev4112 10 ай бұрын

Some of my best A3 prints were made from a 16 MP m4/3 bodies, paired with good quality Olympus primes, like the 45/1.2 Pro. Stunningly sharp.

@chrisb2129 10 ай бұрын

I used to be eager to upgrade to higher mp cameras back in the day, because I thought there was a benefit of going from an 8 mp Canon 20D to 10 mp 40D to a 15 mp 50D, but that cooled off once I got to 18-20 mp in the 7D bodies. It seemed like diminishing returns at that point. A change in perspective also came when I printed heavily cropped photo I took of a Lapland Longspur on ice. I wasn't very close and couldn't get any closer. It was a fantastic photo opportunity, but I had to crop it down to around 2.0 mp to get the composition I wanted in the end. I upscaled it to print at 11x17@360ppi (my printer prints at 360dpi). The detail on the print was perfectly good when hung on a gallery wall I had set up at my workplace. I was astounded that it turned out as it did. That was years ago with software that didn't upscale as good as present day software.

@keithspillett5298 Жыл бұрын

Great video. As a, theoretically, retired professional photographer, I now use the micro four thirds system of cameras. The two bodies I currently own are by Olympus, and are 16mp. I've happily printed images up to 40 inches by 30 inches, and the results look fabulous, completely supporting your comments regarding print sizes. In actual fact, they still stand up well, even under much closer viewing conditions 🙂

@GeorgeStar Жыл бұрын

Same here. I "upgraded" from the E-M1 to the MkII because I felt I "had to" even tho I was perfectly happy with the original. Now I may upgrade to the E-M5 III simply for the lighter weight.

@USGrant21st Жыл бұрын

How many MP do you need? A very easy question to answer, as many pixels as make you happy. What makes one person happy is not the same what makes another person happy. And frankly, everybody is only concerned with their own happiness not somebody else. I know that I'm happy with 42MP from my Sony and not happy with 24MP from the other cameras I used, which includes Sony, Canon, Nikon, and Fuji.

@guyplay Жыл бұрын

Can you recommend a professional printing company that you use for large prints? Thanks!

@tommynikon2283 Жыл бұрын

Similar, 67 here; been using 16MP bodies for years; 99.99% of my stuff is never printed- monitor viewed,....so no worries.

@dj1NM3 Жыл бұрын

I'm pretty sure that most people have an "over inflated" idea as to how many megapixels are required for a good looking page (A4 or letter) sized photo print and thoroughly outlandish expectation for a quart-page newspaper image. Up until very recently, billboard posters had "rosette" pixels which were almost 1/4" across, so even the resolution required for "the side of a building" sized prints is far lower than most people would expect. Of course, this is all presuming that most of the captured image is used, without much cropping and trying to blow up much fewer pixels into an acceptable printed image.

@HowardDavies8 Жыл бұрын

I have a lovely framed print of one of my children. It measures 19 inches by 11 inches and was taken on my original Galaxy Note phone, with a camera sensor of just 2 megapixels. It is adequately sharp for the style of print and looks good. I see little appreciable difference between prints made with my Canon 40d, 5d mkiii, and my r5 when printed for hanging, mounted in a frame, for home use

@deepgeny1 Жыл бұрын

Original galaxy note n7000 had 8 mp camera

@HowardDavies8 Жыл бұрын

@@deepgeny1 You are right. The front facing camera was 2 megapixels. My mistake....the print still looks good though

@selianboy8508 Жыл бұрын

16'x8' print from a slightly cropped D3 Nikon. It was hung on my Studio wall and people walked past at about 4 to 10 foot away. In about 10 years of customers and fellow professionals walking past and viewing it, not one ever questioned its quality. It was printed straight out of Photoshop without much work done on it bar contrast and exposure control. In fact I actually ADDED digital grain to it which is something I do to pretty much every image I ever take! I gain quite a few commissions because of that one image.

@boxingproff7627 9 ай бұрын

Damn! This channel is very informative. No fluff, just straight to the point. Good work.

@petermclennan6781 Жыл бұрын

In 2005 or so, I made a full bleed, 16X20 print of a cheetah sleeping in a tree for my dentist, shot in the wild in Africa, not in a zoo. His image was effectively 1600 pixels on the long side. It's been hanging in his office since then. We were both astonished at the quality, admittedly from an excellent printer - my (long dead) Epson 9800.

@OscarGomez-oo7im 8 ай бұрын

Mr. d'Entremont, you are exactly the best communicator that I have ever listened to. Making all the controls in the camera, concepts about resolution, focus, real need of pixels, etc. something easy to understand goes a long way. Simple language is the secret of instruction and you are probably the best I have found in my life in possession of this art. Thank you for these videos that demystify the "bumba-bumba and yada-yada I hava found in books and classrooms...

@miket2120 Жыл бұрын

An issue rarely mentioned in the megapixel wars: framing. No, not framing for composition. I mean framing the photographic print you made. The more megapixels the larger the print you can have made the larger the frame will need to be to show off your great image. Frame, mat, glazing, backing, labor all go higher nearly exponentially as your print size increases.

@stevemuzak8526 Жыл бұрын

I print poster size photos and proper framing cost me at least $200 or more.

@alansach8437 4 ай бұрын

A reason why canvas and acrylic prints are so popular in larger sizes. Framing large prints can be prohibitively expensive. Canvas and acrylic fit better into modern decor.

@DmitriNesteruk 14 күн бұрын

Canvas and acrylic is not to everyone's taste. If you're decorating in neoclassic style you're bound to use frames and passepartout.

@nickchandley5414 16 күн бұрын

I only recently discovered your channel and your presentations on complex subjects are really fantastic and very well done!

@simon_dentremont 16 күн бұрын

Glad you like them!

@BGTuyau 3 ай бұрын

One of the internet's best explainers sheds some light on the megapixel measure mystery ... . Thanks / Merci ...

@simon_dentremont 3 ай бұрын

Wow, thank you!

@jimmylovesbikes 4 ай бұрын

do you teach because you would make an awesome teacher. ❤

@myprovideo7852 Жыл бұрын

FINALLY !!!!!!!!!!!! I have been looking for this information for decades ( since the year 2000 ) THANK YOU !!!!!!!

@simon_dentremont Жыл бұрын

You are welcome!

@ianbrowne9304 4 ай бұрын

I printed a 40 inch morning sunrise /back lit photo from a 12mp Lumix Fz300 with a 25 -600 consistent f2.8 lens . The senor was the size of my little finger nail . I was totally amazed to how good it was . Way back in film days , I printed a 30 inch photo from a throw away fuji camera/film in box . To get the best photo I used a light meter to take the photo when the light was 250 at F11 --- either 400 or 800 asa film !. I used that photo at our mini lab to sell fuji throw away cameras . On another wall I had a similar 30 inch photo printed from a 645 120 negative . It was only when people had a comparison that they could see the and understand the difference --- nothing has really changed. There is so much BS out there ; mostly from the very early days of digital about file size/print size Today I'm totally happy with Olympus cameras between 16 and 20 px --- I think lol What gives me a laugh "best viewed FULL SCREEN" .

@manchestercity23511 22 күн бұрын

This is very helpful! Love your videos!

@simon_dentremont 22 күн бұрын

I'm so glad!

@PowellGuide 6 ай бұрын

Thanks Simon. Great video. I've been shooting with Nikon D750 for years, both day and night and it's just fine at 24mp. A 30x40" print looks great

@jnparesa 2 ай бұрын

While working at the Department of Veterans Affairs in Sacramento/Mather we purchased a Canon D30 in 2003 it was a 2.1megapixel. I made a 24 x36 inch print of one of my staff and it worked perfectly using photoshop CS

@photofair37 4 ай бұрын

I made a spectacular 20x30 inch print from a 12 mp camera cropped to 6mp. It was a detailed city scape and could survive a fairly close inspection. That was 15 years ago.

@travel734 Жыл бұрын

Thanks Simon for a well reasoned explanation. I used to do sports photography for a local newspaper. I was using a 6MP sensor and sometimes cropping. The editors never had an issue with the resolution of my images. Even when players and teams asked for prints there were no issues. I find that with a good lens, a 15MP camera can be printed, with some work, up to 17" by 22", but life is a lot easier with a 24 to 26MP camera. My personal record was a 1 MP image (Kodak) printed at 12" by 16". It took a lot of work and filters to change the image to a watercolour effect. Cheating? Maybe, but it is art not reporting.

@SmallSpoonBrigade Жыл бұрын

It's worth noting that 6MP is enough for most purposes. However, if you move from that to say 24mp, you can downsize that 24mp image to 6MP and get a massive reduction in noise as you'd then have 4 pixels being averaged to give one pixel that's far less likely to be influenced by noise and possibly dust particles on the sensor. A photographer with exemplary skills can blow up a low MP image to staggering dimensions and still have something that looks good. But, the bigger you want to go with a smaller number of MP, the better your technique and processing needs to be. The only real upper limit is on storage space, data transmission time and processing.

@pauljansen6650 Жыл бұрын

I haven't even bought a camera yet but learning all I can until I get mine next month. Living in South Africa hoping to get into wildlife photography. Thank you Simon, you are a breathe of fresh air compared to most info channels. Honest and sincere....

@simon_dentremont Жыл бұрын

I’m off to Africa in June! Can’t wait!

@BigBadLoneWolf Жыл бұрын

Invest in the glass, not the body

@akbarkamdar4906 Жыл бұрын

Hey Paul, fellow South African here, be sure to take a good look at the lenses you want to start with as well as the lenses you want down the road, especially if pricing is a concern. a lot of brands are heavily overpriced here compared to overseas, especially Canon, I ended up going for Sony because of the pricing of third-party lenses, but there's a lot of others to choose from too

@pauljansen6650 Жыл бұрын

@akbarkamdar4906 thanks man. My plan is to understand exactly what I want/need in the next month and then compare prices on Amazon. I ship quite a bit of stuff from USA because even with shipping/duties its cheaper.

@DannyB-cs9vx Жыл бұрын

If you have a budget to work within, consider Micro Four Thirds. The lenses are much smaller, lighter, and less costly, and have an effective focal length twice that as a full frame. This means if you are shooting wildlife at a distance using a 200mm MFT lens, the subject will look like you shot it with a 400mm full frame lens. I used to go to national parks and compare my photos with those for sale at the gift shop. Very disappointing. A hobbyist will never have the time or money to get the same shot as a pro. A pro may wait a year for the right conditions, and take a thousand shots to pick out the best one. they will then enhance the picture with software. My camera is for memories, and just about any camera will take that sort of picture. Even a smart phone is plenty. If you need a lot of zoom and wide angle, Many bridge cameras do well. I bought a used one with a 42x zoom. I will often use it instead of my high dollar rigs.

@brunocastelowildlifephotog5674 3 ай бұрын

Best video on this subject I've ever seen on the internet.

@user-kc9fx1qb1m 4 ай бұрын

Most knowledgeable KZfaqr I've seen. Thankyou for handling complicated topics and making them make sense!!!

@bmeclipse Жыл бұрын

So glad you covered this. Digital resolution is definitely a hot topic right now. I taught the ad department at a firm I used to work photoshop and indesign. The most requested topic was DPI and digital resolution. The cameras we had back then were around 12mp. That was 2000. Social media has caused some pros to stop thinking about DPI and optical resolution. Very nicely done!

@simon_dentremont Жыл бұрын

Thanks for sharing!!

@constantinosschinas4503 Жыл бұрын

12Mpixels in 2000? Which camera. Highly doubt. Maybe a Leaf digital back? Not even prior to 2003. But it was not a camera, it was a scanner. Nikon D1 was 2.7Mp and D2X was in 2004.

@USGrant21st Жыл бұрын

I know a person who's happily driving 15 yo Fiat 500. It doesn't make it a good car though.

@4Kandlez Жыл бұрын

@@USGrant21st Why is it not a good car?

@bradmiller9993 9 ай бұрын

I once (early digital days) made an 11x14 from a 3MP point and shoot that was fantastic. The other great thing about DXO's database relates to age: when evaluating sensors, they also supply the year the sensor was manufactured, which is significant since - as time goes on - these sensors get better and better. Thanks for the video.

@AngryMetabee 4 ай бұрын

A4 sized picture with 10 MP Canon 1000D. Looks gorgious!

@Ninja-th2to 7 ай бұрын

One of the best videos I have seen - rather than the usual sale pitches an honest assessment of real world needs. Thank You for a refreshing view.

@simon_dentremont 7 ай бұрын

Wow, thanks!

@drdehailey 5 ай бұрын

Excellent information. I print 24X17 at 240DPI, and I have never heard a complaint.

@MalcolmRuthven 4 ай бұрын

That's what my 24MP Canon T7I (6,000 x 4,000 pixels) will do. Larger would also work if viewing at more of a distance.

@andrewgallup3890 Жыл бұрын

You cover the megapixel thing. Now your thoughts on full frame, crop, and medium format and perhaps DSLR vs mirrorless.

@simon_dentremont Жыл бұрын

On my list!

@mattcero1 7 ай бұрын

"Pixel Peep" finally showed up in the conversation at 6:45'ish.

@KWHCoaster 2 ай бұрын

Very nice pic of the Peggys Cove lighthouse. I visit Peggys Cove every trip back home.

@robhowarth77 Жыл бұрын

About time somebody took on this subject . Even 50 years ago , when I started photography , I learned in my course that the primary concern for a large/ medium/fine grain film , was the intended viewing distance of the finished print . I still shoot film today on a regular basis , and for digital , I have been using a 10.2 megapixel Nikon D3000. I bought this in 2010 and have no intention in getting caught up in the pixel race . I regularly make 16X 24 inch prints . If I want to make bigger prints , I use my C330. No problem ! Thank you for bringing this to the attention of the pixel hungry public who I think are often lured into wasting money by the advertisers.

@thothheartmaat2833 Жыл бұрын

the 7 mp camera is even better

@keithwiebe1787 Жыл бұрын

I think that's why every pro photographer 30 years ago was using medium format for portrait work. It always produced grainless enlargements. 35mm was hideous in this respect.

@robhowarth77 Жыл бұрын

@@keithwiebe1787 Yes. No pro photographer used any less for portraits and advertising shots.. The C220 /C330 and the RB 67 plus Pentax 6X7 were the most popular here in South Africa . The Rolleiflex was extremely expensive . Also have a 1956 Yashica D in perfect working condition and I use it every couple of weeks . Amazing qualtity durable camera.

@keithwiebe1787 Жыл бұрын

@Rob Howarth I used the C330f in my business but nobody else that I knew. They mostly used Mamiya RB67 in studio and maybe Hasselblad for weddings.

@robhowarth77 Жыл бұрын

@@keithwiebe1787 The C330 was used here extensively in wedding photography . I personally , love the square format .

@paulstickley4819 Жыл бұрын

I have a 42 MP camera and shoot mainly insects. I often crop to 8 MP (or less) and view on my 4k monitors. If the image is tack sharp they look really good at 8 MP. I like to shoot from further away and crop in, as it increases depth of field, aids autofocus and is less likely to scare the insect. If the image is sharp, cropping deeply is fine. I print up to 13" * 19" (330mm * 485mm) and they look fine.

@froreyfire Жыл бұрын

Nice! So you shoot your FF camera as if it were a Micro Four Thirds camera! :-)

@paulstickley4819 Жыл бұрын

@@froreyfire No. Because it enables me to capture the insects in flight at the edge of the screen. If it was smaller sensor they would be out of shot. I also do not just only shoot insects.

@froreyfire Жыл бұрын

@@paulstickley4819 Fair point.

@superzero4250 Жыл бұрын

So basically your 4K monitors resolve less than 12mp. Which is probably why iPhone's are usually only 12mp, and the Sony Alpha 7SIII is also 12mp too... 🤔

@superzero4250 Жыл бұрын

@@paulstickley4819 What lens are you shooting with, the sensor is not the reason. It's like you did not understand the video you are posting on... 🤔

@MartianCitizen 3 ай бұрын

Awesome...Your a very good teacher. Thanks for the information.

@simon_dentremont 3 ай бұрын

Glad to help

@AnnaVahtera Күн бұрын

It's 2024. My main camera has 20Mpix sensor, but I didn't pick it for that but other features. I've shot with a 16MPix camera for years and it would still be more than enough for me. I would've been okay with a 16M sensor, but the camera that I wanted came with a 20M sensor, so.

@richardberke4539 Жыл бұрын

If I was going through college again I'd seek out any courses you teach. Great clarity of information, presented with an amount of detail and comparisons that makes so much sense. A great match with how I enjoy learning.

@OldGirlPhotography Жыл бұрын

Not only the voice of reason, but with the ability to explain it in a meaningful way. Thank you Simon.

@viralhype_ 2 ай бұрын

Haven't yet taken the plunge to buy my first 'proper' camera. I have a very small budget so, I found this very useful and reassuring that I don't 'need' to go for an unnecessarily high pixel count. 👍

@simon_dentremont 2 ай бұрын

Glad it was helpful!

@ianlang6058 Жыл бұрын

Enjoyed this bloke because he understands what he is talking about.

@simon_dentremont Жыл бұрын

Very kind

@JasonJaggersphtoography 6 ай бұрын

This video is refreshing. I am so tired of gear pushers with GAS . I just watched a video where a kid said 16 mp is enough for social media if that's all you want to do. People need to get real 5 mp is enough for social media. But then again I'm old and come from 120 film my first digital camera for work was a 5d and I made a lot of money with that 12mp camera. I have had GAS a few times before I remembered that cameras do not take better pictures for you. Sorry this is my weekly rant.

@jefife750 9 ай бұрын

Upon running across your YT channel, I immediately subscribed. Your ability to present complex topics in a brief and concise way without becoming boring, is a gift that’s hard to find. You have become one of my few “go to “ sources for pro level photography knowledge. You have taught me a lot and I thank you. Please continue the great work. Your photos are predictably amazing!

@simon_dentremont 9 ай бұрын

Wow, thank you

@Pouch-Thinking 7 ай бұрын

Speaking as a professional graphic designer, with 30 years' experience, I've been trying to explain this to clients for years. People just don't seem to get it. Many times I've been tasked with creating exhibition graphics 10 metres and up, using key art with a max res of 300dpi at A4. Absolutely not a problem. Just scale up the artwork to the required size, and let the resolution naturally fall off. It can go as low as it needs, because, as Simon so clearly points out, you are standing further back the larger the image is- so the resolution issue is simply a non-issue.

@tobiasyoder 4 ай бұрын

It’s always nice to hear accurate information

@ZenoOkapi 9 ай бұрын

Always the calm voice of well informed reasoning. Thank you

@1ricollins 7 күн бұрын

In the old days, I got some great 8x10 prints from a 2.0 MP camera. These prints are sharp enough that I am very certain that I could blow them up a lot more. The best camera in the world is the one that you've got with you!

@pierrelaviolette670 5 ай бұрын

Another great KZfaq, thanks Simon

@simon_dentremont 5 ай бұрын

Very welcome

@debtoralive4693 Жыл бұрын

After watching your videos I sometimes have to admit to myself that I had originally learned or understood certain aspects of photography incorrectly. And I realize I've been wrong because of how you make these somerimes complicated subjects so easy to grasp. Also I like the more advanced photographer approach. I've seen too many videos going over stuff I've known for years. Tnanks and please keep making these informative videos because I can not learn too much about photography.

@kerc Жыл бұрын

Great video. Megapixels is definitely not the most important thing on digital. I absolutely love shooting with my old Sony A100, not only because of how good it feels to use, but because I simply love the results I get from its "measly" 10 megapixel CCD sensor and its very pleasing, natural look. With some final refinements using Affinity Photo, I get really beautiful results!

@kisbiflos 3 ай бұрын

Sometimes I forget to pay attention to what you are saying, because im lost starting at your background. Awesome setup Simon. Thanks for the videos!

@tourinojacks5844 4 ай бұрын

Where is the LOVE button for this explanation! #KNOWLEDGE #GAMECHANGER Bravo, Simon! Bravo! 💪📷💯🙏

@iflyplanes4MC Жыл бұрын

I'm into aviation photography and after weeks of consulting your content, I bought my first DSLR yesterday and I'm absolutely thrilled to see what I can do with all of the tips I have picked up from the channel. Thank you Simon!

@andresgonzalezcerda7635 Жыл бұрын

And what was your findings?. Wich dsrl did you choose?

@martinj9251 Жыл бұрын

Are you shooting moving planes? What is your mp?

@iflyplanes4MC Жыл бұрын

@@martinj9251 Yes I was also on a budget. I’m on the 18mp 7D.

@martinj9251 Жыл бұрын

@@iflyplanes4MC Are u getting good moving shots with that mp

@dadgum5648 Жыл бұрын

glad to see your channel blow up so much. I feel lucky to be getting into bird photography right after you started posting videos. I've learned so much in the last couple of months, and your videos are the perfect length to go back and rewatch when I feel like I need to understand a specific thing better

@franktherabbit42 10 ай бұрын

This is the reason I chose the Nikon Z7ii over the Z6ii. I crop my photos quite alot and the 45mp was just the better choice for me. I cant wait to start shooting with it and the Z 180-600mm. (I also spent the difference on the camera itself instead of buying a teleconverter, especially with a variable aperture lens)

@ProfessorArmando 10 ай бұрын

Great video Simon, but I'd like to offer a counterpoint. It's important to note that a sensor with a higher pixel density can be beneficial for generating sharper image output, as the pixels will be downsized. The same applies to image noise reduction. With downsampling, noise tends to be lower. This is not to discredit the points made in the video, but rather to add another perspective to the discussion.

@JeffreyNewman-ub5dh Жыл бұрын

This is a great video. I've been taking photos for over 40 years. Starting with film, going through all of the megapixel resolutions with Canon and little Nikon. Simon has captured and presented the hard lessons I've learned very well. Old pros will know I'm right. Everybody else you may want to take this info to heart.

@niner_six_echo Жыл бұрын

I hear ya. I learned this when I started printing large(r) images.

@yourdiytechlife 6 ай бұрын

I love your common sense approach to explaining photography. its so easy to get wrapped around the axle over the wrong things when purchasing tech that its really valuable to get that real world experience that you share.

@simon_dentremont 6 ай бұрын

Thanks 👍

@luzr6613 27 күн бұрын

One of the many things i've learned from following this channel... and one of the most critically important is - and i kid you not - that megapixels are far less important than is how hard you are able to jam the eyepiece against your eyebrow. The callous has ruined my good looks, but boy, has that technique improved my long-lens performance.

@SirJoelMarquez Ай бұрын

Simon is a genius. I love his videos 👏

@simon_dentremont Ай бұрын

Too kind!

@CalTek Жыл бұрын

Your knowledge is absolutely insane and absolutely appreciated. Thanks so much for sharing with the rest of us photogs and I look forward to more content from you :)

@simon_dentremont Жыл бұрын

My pleasure!

@simon_dentremont Жыл бұрын

Hey Caltek, I’m working on a video course for wildlife photography. Can I use your comment in promotional material, with attribution? Thanks

@CalTek Жыл бұрын

@@simon_dentremont certainly. Thanks for asking.

@michaelganey6469 Жыл бұрын

Simon, your explanations are so clear and easy to follow! Thanks for the work you put into them.

@numlock9653 4 ай бұрын

When I upgraded from a 21mp camera to a 50mp camera, every armchair expert told me it was a waste, that I would never see the difference. Well, they were ALL WRONG, the difference was enormous, so long as I used premium lenses. The lens matters more than your sensor by far, but if the sensor cant resolve what your lens is capable of then you really are wasting your money. I rather error on the side of having "too much" resolution than to degrade my extremely expensive lenses. Since high resolution camera bodies cost far less than the best lenses available it just makes sense to buy the highest resolution available and stop listening to all the "experts" with apparently very bad eyesight.

@davep6603 6 ай бұрын

I was recently discussing this video with a friend of mine who had shared it. After watching, I told him: “That’s the best explanation I have ever heard. This guy is a amazing teacher.” His reply, which I wholeheartedly agree with: “Simon is by far the best at providing and explaining photography related information.” Keep up the great work, Simon!

@simon_dentremont 6 ай бұрын

Too kind!

@Fahrenheit353 Жыл бұрын

Being very new to photography, I wanted to add something I learned from coming over from astrophotography. One thing I did, wrong or right, I went pixel chasing with my astro camera (specially cooled cameras). The thing that really stuck out to me more than the importance of resolution, MP, or whatever, is really the pixel size. The smaller the pixel, the lower the noise (kind of, has to do with the electron well), and the crisper the pictures. That was really important to me and can really help make you images pop. One one to "figure out" the pixel size and kind of why people go down these rabbit holes to get the highest pixel is that they are somewhat related. The higher the pixel count on a the same sensor, the smaller the pixel, and the sharper it looks. With that being said, I recently bought an a7r IV, which takes amazing pictures, and have a dedicated astro camera that is only 9MP, BUT both have the same pixel size. Thinking about it, I could go the route of a crop sensor and a cheaper camera than the a7R IV, and create mosaics with Photoshop (what I did with the astro camera), but I have to admit the larger field of view I get with the a7R IV is just so nice.

@Axel_Andersen Жыл бұрын

That is interesting, I would have thought the smaller the pixel the less signal. When you get to photon level (like I think astrophotography goes) the noise in the signa (not camera or ccd) is quantum noise limited which is sqrt(N) so from that point of view signal to noise ratio is N/sqrt(N). If you have 100 photons you S/N is 100/sqrt(10) = 10:1 , but if you double the pixel size you collect 400 photons and your S/N is 400/sqrt(400) = 20:1. Also electronics noise is independent of signal so more signal better S/N which also points to the benefit of a larger pixels size. But what do I know, I'm probably wrong.

@davepastern Жыл бұрын

and this is why I went with the 24mp R3 over the 45mp R5. R5 has rolling shutter, poorer DR and high ISO performance leaves something to be desired (when compared to the R3). The R3 was my first choice and it ticks all of the boxes.

@nigelwest3430 11 ай бұрын

I made the same choice coming from an EOS R, the R3 is an amazing camera

@alanbayley3255 7 күн бұрын

Excellent video that explodes the myths regarding pixels. People are still being duped into buying 4K phones that are imposible to see any benefit from on a smart phone or any tv smaller than about 55 inches. Even most cinemas today are still only about 2K at best so if you think you are seeing 4K on your phone maybe you have been mislead. The videos may look better on a newer phone but that is not down to it being 4K.

@kennyw6932 2 ай бұрын

I found your presentation extremely interesting and informative. Thank you for sharing.

@simon_dentremont 2 ай бұрын

Glad it was helpful!

@glMILAN9800 10 ай бұрын

I wanna add an unpopular reason to have more MP: folks who do 3D scan with photogrammetry. You can get amazingly more detailed models with a higher MP camera, but other than that niche, totally agree with Simon, Incredible video

@simon_dentremont 10 ай бұрын

Thanks for sharing

@PhilChavanne Жыл бұрын

Absolutely awesome video. You clarified a major hang-up I had for years. The « pixel-peeping » part is sooooo on point! And the matter of lens resolution (never thought of it before) brings a whole lot of clarity to the issue. Thank you for the time, care, and expertise you put into this video. Subscribed!

@andyklapper8484 3 ай бұрын

I have one counter example for you (though your logic, generally speaking, works) - we have a large photo from our wedding on our living room wall (~30x40"). It is a photo of us and all of our guests shot from the second floor balcony. Our wedding photographer used to take it to bridal shows, when he found a more photogenetic group of people, he replaced it and we bought it from him at a discount. You can probably guess why this is a counter example already - everybody that sees the photo walks right up to it, and from 8" (or less) away starts looking to find themselves or somebody they know in the photo. We are old timers however so the question of megapixels was never asked - it was shot on an analog camera with 2"x2" film negatives.

@LifeofCharlie19 Ай бұрын

Excellent videos. Clear as day. Subbed on this, the second video.👍👍

@simon_dentremont Ай бұрын

Welcome aboard!

@StackOverflow80 Жыл бұрын

When I started with digital photography, I used Minolta Dimage S-414 compact camera. I remember 4 megapixels was uselessly much for me. So I took pictures in 2 MP, it saved precious memory space. Still I was able to make decent letter-sized prints from these photos. Of course by photo lab on RA-4 photo paper. If this Minolta camera managed to focus properly (sometimes it didn't), the sharpness was stunning. Also the colours were very vivid and film-like.

@mattdavis5058 Жыл бұрын

Great video! One point I would note is that the DxOMark score in P-Mpix is best considered as a ratio to the sensor resolution that it was tested on. When I was shopping for pro quality Micro 4/3 lenses, I was crestfallen to find that the sharpest lens is only 16 P-Mpix, compared to over 30 for the best Canon and Nikon lenses! But they are actually about the same in optical quality.

@rangersmith4652 3 ай бұрын

Remember, 4K is 8.3 mega pixels. Anything beyond that, as long as you use the whole sensor or very close it in the final crop, is better than 4K. For a 16x20" B&W print at "hanging on the wall" distance, 100 ppi is perfectly good. Even my 40D (10.1 MP) can create images good enough for that.

@davidcoorey423 4 ай бұрын

Without a doubt, one of the most useful photography videos I've ever seen. Thank you, Simon!

@simon_dentremont 4 ай бұрын

Wow, thanks!

@davidcoorey423 4 ай бұрын

@@simon_dentremontNo, thank you! Made a heap of sense😊. Looking forward to watching more of your postings. Regards, David.

@indefinitelyserge547 6 ай бұрын

I appreciate the break down of what our eye sees vs what we need. Very informative for someone new into all of the photography jargon like myself.

@falxonPSN Жыл бұрын

Another great video Simon! This is a point that a lot of people seem to overlook around the printing resolution versus the viewing distance. On a slightly different note I've got a Canon R3 that is a relatively low megapixel body but what I have been finding is that the high ISO performance is very, very clean allowing me to shoot very close to sunset at high ISOs and still get good images after doing some noise recovery in DXO.