Nader Shah was born earlier, right? So is Nader really the "Asian Napoleon"? Or is Napoleon the "European Nader"? 🤔

@@Qoral-ef5rzyup I always thought the same he did it before napoleon

This thought crossed my mind multiple times in the production for this video!

​@@Qoral-ef5rz And Napoleon himself was famously an admirer of Nader and had read about all of his campaigns. I even remember reading somewhere that one of his actual nicknames _was_ "Nader of France" (but I'm not sure how true this is). So, I think calling Napoleon "Nader of France" would be more justified than calling Nader "Napoleon of Persia."

The story of Ertugrul

He sacked Delhi, but didn't annex it. But regardless, his actions cemented the decline of Muslim power in India. He and his protégé Abdali all but guaranteed that the Mughals, and other North Indian Muslim nobles, would lack the resources to rule. And a few generations later, it led to Muslims being limited to the peripheries of India (i.e. Pakistan and Bangladesh).

@@Qoral-ef5rz yes it was impossible, to rule there. But even defeating of Moghuls was a masterpiece of his genius and leadership.

@@soroushmahmoudiandehkordi4858 The Mughals were already in decline, having fought civil wars and rebellions for years. By the time Nader showed up at Delhi, the Mughal emperor literally just opened the gates for him... but that didn't stop him from ransacking the place. Anyways, my main gripe with him is that he basically caused the complete loss of Muslim-ruled India.

@@Qoral-ef5rz they were declining but Moghuls in Karnal had army twice of Nader’s, that make sense since india were much bigger and more populated. Still he managed to defeat them. And yes, what he did in delhi was barbaric.

“Attempted, rather unconvincingly, to reassure Nader shah. The friars then presented their gifts, which included a fine illustrated Bible. Abbas opened it by chance at a picture of St Michael brandishing his sword over a prostrate Lucifer. He asked who the vanquished figure was, and on being told it was the Devil, he laughed and said he thought it was the Turk - glancing over at the ambassador as he said this, at the Ottoman pasha, 'for he lost no opportunity to mock them.'"

Napoleon literally had to fight the most powerful countries on earth and not only defeated them but until 1809 he made it look exceptionally easily. Even after 1809 the allies were only able to beat him by copying him and not engaging him directly in combat until they had overwhelming superiors in numbers. They’re both brilliant but there’s a reason Napoleon is considered the best.

Matter of perspective To the west, Nadar Qoli was the Napoleon of Asia To the Islamic world, Napoleon was the Nadar Qoli of Europe

@@Yellow-kp9gs Nader was also fighting ottomans and moghuls which were super powers of their time. They were declining, but I think Ottomans were still way more powerful than any other European country at that time.

@@soroushmahmoudiandehkordi4858 Ottomans we’re largely in decline by this point- the Austrians often sent more men to fight the French in this period than they did to fight the ottomans. The Mughal empire was also doing poorly in this period, which is also mentioned in this video. Regardless Nadar never had to fight multiple great powers/coalitions at once, many of which contained the most powerful armies and empires in the world. Nadar was great but Napoleon was the far better general.

@@Yellow-kp9gs that’s true. But France was industrialized country during Napoleon. Iran was not and it was in decline for so many years and it was a divided country.

If you think that's impressive, wait until you hear about the Afghan Hotaks. They overthrew the Safavids, and then beat back the Ottomans when they tried to restore their traditional rivals to the Iranian throne. That's a 2-in-1. Nader came after them.

Napoleon stopped searching when he was defeated, but Nader Shah was defeated only once in his life, by Topal Pasha of the Ottoman Empire. After his defeat, he quickly returned to Iran and prepared an army. People from all over Iran came to his aid. Topal still Not happy for his victory, when Nader's new army reached him, Nader fought again with Topal and defeated Topal Pasha and killed him in the middle of the battle. He sent Topal Pasha's body to Istanbul with respect. Nader the Great was a legend.

The Afghans were not capable of overthrowing the Safavids. After suppressing the Afghans, Nader Shah dismissed the Safavids and established the Afshariya in a meeting in the Mughan plain.​@@Qoral-ef5rz

@@Qoral-ef5rz They had a brief surge but it’s still nothing compared to Nader’s accomplishments.

@PhilipIIofMacedon-ww8in Yes, Nader Shah suffered a lot of losses in Dagestan, but in the end he conquered Dagestan

ever heard about ranjit singh

​@@AncientRelicTalesLol just some regional kings nothing else 😂

@@ibn_abu_amr nepoleon of iran not asia 😂. You make own happiness

@@tusharkashyap8144 Says an ignorant with no knowledge of history

@@ibn_abu_amr ohh you know about history. So why are you come here in this video. May be you come here for advertisement of Nader shah. Lol average kid.

Turkemans are from Mongolia 😂

Kurds, Aryans=Ar+yan in Kurdish are the only real indiginous people of what you call Iran now in the past 100 years. Persian/Parthian is also a kurdish word. Pars/parastin all Kurdish words and have Kurdish meaning. Tirkeman are from Mongolia so if you don't look like a Mongol then you were a kurd who speaks Turkish language 😂😂😂

​@@watup3494kurds were always nomadic in nature and are of iranic origin. There's a reason they're spread over from Syria, Turkey and Iraq all the way to northern Iran. It's not about a single ethnicity here bro. Iranians are not only Farsi.

​@@watup3494turkmens are from what's present day Turkmenistan. They have mongoloid genes in them just like all of Centra Asia and even beyond but they're a different people.

Yes bro, Nader Shah is underrated for sure. He was a great leader and a military genius.

He was Tafzili Jafari. Shi’ism comes in two major strains Tafzilism and Rafidism. Although he was a Rafidi earlier on in his life he began to lean towards Tafzilism later on. Many early adherents of Zaydi or Jafari Madhab were in fact Tafzili.

@@Therock151214 Yeah maybe it's the case, but at his time their were no tafdilis, these were called Zaydis, 12ers were all rafidis, probably it was a political move to lore the sunnis for his own interests, jaafaris were never tafdilis, tafdilis were at the time of Imam Ali who followed him politically not theologically when he held power, Imam Jaafar As-Sadeq wasn't born yet, those were just shia politically called tafdili

Aren't 12ers all rafidis considering they don't accept the caliphate of the first three caliphs as per the definition "rejectors"?

@@zxera9702 Yes all are, except negligible individuals Apparently Nader shah wanted to appease the sunnis by accepting the 3 for his own political and self interests

“Attempted, rather unconvincingly, to reassure Nader shah. The friars then presented their gifts, which included a fine illustrated Bible. Abbas opened it by chance at a picture of St Michael brandishing his sword over a prostrate Lucifer. He asked who the vanquished figure was, and on being told it was the Devil, he laughed and said he thought it was the Turk - glancing over at the ambassador as he said this, at the Ottoman pasha, 'for he lost no opportunity to mock them.'"

Yea Nader shah was the Persian napoleon

@@Techtalk2030 my comment was about the art .... are you a bot automatically replying to people or did you reply to my comment by mistake.

Glad you enjoyed it!

@@HikmaHistory “Attempted, rather unconvincingly, to reassure Nader shah. The friars then presented their gifts, which included a fine illustrated Bible. Abbas opened it by chance at a picture of St Michael brandishing his sword over a prostrate Lucifer. He asked who the vanquished figure was, and on being told it was the Devil, he laughed and said he thought it was the Turk - glancing over at the ambassador as he said this, at the Ottoman pasha, 'for he lost no opportunity to mock them.'"

My pleasure, thanks Michael!

My guy!

Much appreciated

Dude he didnt conqure india he just sacked delhi and went home 😑 In india we only study him as part of decline of mughal empire which he sealed

Supporters of Nader are not our brothers 😢

​@@ShubhamKumar-vd9xy why india is always an easy target of foreign powers I really wonder sometimes

@@KanuniSuleyman4857 bcz of weak rulers who fought among themselves

@@ShubhamKumar-vd9xy Even now Indian subcontinet is too divided to be conquered again by other powers. We're divided into different religious factions I.e Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs, Christians etc who want to establish their own absolute rule over entire subcontinent and always fight among themselves. India has been in a state of chaos since Aurangzeb Alamgir died and power struggle started in this region

The artefacts of high culture has always been attractive for invaders! Unfortunately, persians couldn't value it and had already dismantled the peacock throne to sell its gold and diamonds

Glad to hear it!

Nadir Shah was not an Iranian nationalist, but a Turkish supremacist. Even though they were often his enemies, he respected the Ottoman Empire and adopted them as a role model for his own state.

Except that Napoleon is not criminal meanwhile Nader is criminal

@@ShubhamKumar-vd9xy Napoleon wasn't a criminal? If white-worshipping was a crime you'd be on death row.

​@@ShubhamKumar-vd9xy Pajeet Napoleon killed more innocent people then nadir ever did.

​@@Spartan_DisiplinYou don't know Nadershah at all, you got all the information from the pages of Pan Turk, Nadershah is known as the greatest nationalist and superior among Iranians, read his story yourself to understand why Iranians They love him very much. He gave us pride, he is the reason for our hope for the future Nader was more Iranian than me Now go cry and be jealous of our glorious history and count the number of Iranian and Ottoman battles and see which country has the most victories.

Thank you!

Thank you!

Glad you enjoyed it!

Thank you very much!

What ya think?

I enjoyed it, interesting topic about something I'd never hear about otherwise.@@HikmaHistory

Decent shout!

Glad you enjoyed it!

Turkic Leader ❤

​​​@@Afshar1 so what??? Nader iran zamin?

@@Afshar1 he wasnt a turkic mongol

@@persianguy1524 🤣

@@Afshar1 you say he was turk I say he was the leader of Iran and he was Iranian you love him I love him both are right .

Sir , there is nothing called Persia , this name was used for the first time during pahlavi dynasty about 60 years ago , he wanted to claim Iran as an Persian country but it ended with a bloody revolution , Safavids were Kurdish , Afsharyds were Kurdish , Zands were lure , Qajars were Azeri , Pahlavi was Persian , it's a disrespect to call iran Persia

@@personalmobile9421. 😂 safawids and afshars were not kurdish ignorant, afshar is one of the clans of oghuz

@@refikkartaler2081 I'm one of the Afsharyds family , we live in Khorasan, we still have our Afsharyds unique culture and dances 😂😂😂 internet is a free source , use it honey

@@personalmobile9421 Kurds are Iranians, so jus tell people to say Iranian. My mother is Kurdish from Bukan Iran, and we are fully aware of being Iranians. If you look at those Iranian ethnicities you listed, they all share almost the same genetics.

@@agostocobain2729 but the revolutionaries are saying different , the (Jin Jian Azadi) movement says something else , you are not a Kurd , you are a (Jash) If you are sure about Kurds to consider themselves as Iranian , then why are they fighting , why they got the republic of Mahabad , or i have a suggestion , why don't your beloved Iran government is not making a voting ??? More than 1500 kurdish people got executed by Iran , yes yes we love Iran 😂😂😂 Edit: I found your other comments , you introduced yourself as an Azeri 😂😂😂 I knew you are not Kurd

it would be great if you could prepare a video about the relationship between iranian dynasties and turkmen subjects since the latter was main part of rebellious groups and the core part of imperial army. as far as I know all of irans turkic dynasties used Turkmen to found their empire but then all those dynasties had to fight against turkmen at some point.

@@berdigylychrejepbayev7503they weren’t turkic though but usually mixed and Persianized, making them Persian

Great point!@@berdigylychrejepbayev7503

The pleasure was all mine Parsa, thank you again for your invaluable help!

It would be interesting to see new findings about the legitimacy issue of Nodir. Obviously, Nodir was quite a weak figure in terms of legitimate power. Therefore, it would be interesting to research to understand to what extent Nodir's legitimacy was weak and what was Nodir's vision on establishing his legitimacy to rule

And when he died, all that he worked for vanished. He was a force imposing his own will, and once he was gone, so did it too

His rule is known as "nader shahee" equated with loot or looting in addition to the murder of thousands of people in Delhi.

An apt way to put it. He is like Timur, in this sense. Timur caused the Ottoman Interregnum, puppeteered Turco-Mongol Khans, and destabilized the Tughlaq dynasty in India. Nader did basically the same thing, but in the early-modern age. As for his religion, his official espousal of a heretical sect is condemnable enough. But it's possible he was an atheist.

This is similar to what to timur did

just like timur. these two guys were curse on muslims and islam.

Which battle?

@@HikmaHistory Siege of Baghdad in 1733

Built the worlds strongest army in less than a decade, translated the Bible and other works into Farsi, placed agreements with Ottomans which allowed Iranians to go on pilgrimage to Mecca, regained all of irans lost lands + wasn’t exiled like a wuss on a cozy island 🏝️😂 all whilst being a nobody shepherd and Napoleon grew up in nobility and all the military training in the world

He left a strong iran, identity and jurisprudence

@@reeyees50 You have to prove it bro! What was the identity before then? What did jurisprudence look like in Safavid dynasty? How did Nader change it? Why did Nader change it? Based on what you think this legacy still exists? What made this legacy survive ?

IRAN is the legacy of Nader. If not for him, I don't think Iran would ever have been reunited again.

​@@reziinho1414 Did this "strongest nomadic army" could take any Ottoman city? Booooom! Bingoooo! hahaha Napoleon changed the course of history, dude! Nader just regained former Safavid land! Another bingo ahahaha

Nader the Great became king from nothing and defeated the Ottomans, Russia and India, Ahmed stole part of Nader's wealth and attacked India, which was in ruins.

@@Poiyti Good answer

​@@literallynothinghere9089😂 But ultimately Sikhs captured Peshawar 🗿 🇮🇳 Pashtun Biggest City

@@user-yh8xg4ny5y Marathas were defeated though

@@literallynothinghere9089 Marathas only faced a temporary setback at Panipat in 1761. Just 10 years later in 1771 Marathas recaptured Delhi & Panipat from the Rohillas to recover their power back over North India. 2nd Anglo-Maratha War 1803 was the real knockout punch from which the Marathas never recovered again

🪑

Dude, joking aside (you know I always have to be mean), this is a really good video. I'm legit cancelling my video on Nader Shah because of this. Amazing work!

Haha thanks man, spent a whole bunch of time on it. If I had some more time, I could've made it better.

Why you guys stopped doing livestream collaboration...? 😢

Persian napoleon

About the Turkic origin of Nader Shah Afshar and the Afsharid dynasty: "Born in November 1688 into a humble pastoral family, then at its winter camp in Darra Gaz in the mountains north of Mashad, Nāder belonged to a group of the Qirqlu branch of the Afšār Turkmen. Beginning in the 16th century, the Safavids had settled groups of Afšārs in northern Khorasan to defend Mashad against Uzbek incursions." "Nāder's focus on common Turkmen descent likewise was designed to establish a broad political framework that could tie him, more closely than his Safavid predecessors, to both Ottomans and Mughals. When describing Nāder's coronation, Astarābādi called the assembly on the Moğān steppe a quriltäy, evoking the practice of Mughal and Timurid conclaves that periodically met to select new khans. In various official documents, Nāder recalled how he, Ottomans, Uzbeks, and Mughals shared a common Turkmen heritage. This concept for him resembled, in broad terms, the origin myths of 15th century Anatolian Turkmen dynasties. However, since he also addressed the Mughal emperor as a "Turkmen" ruler, Nāder implicitly extended the word "Turkmen" to refer, not only to progeny of the twenty-four Gozz tribes, but to Timur's descendants as well." - Encyclopædia Iranica, Nāder Shah

@@theheroickhan “Attempted, rather unconvincingly, to reassure the shah. The friars then presented their gifts, which included a fine illustrated Bible. Abbas opened it by chance at a picture of St Michael brandishing his sword over a prostrate Lucifer. He asked who the vanquished figure was, and on being told it was the Devil, he laughed and said he thought it was the Turk - glancing over at the ambassador as he said this, at the Ottoman pasha, 'for he lost no opportunity to mock them.'"

@@theheroickhannader shah literally mocked torks

​​@@persianguy1524Sources ? Nader Shah called Iran "the hereditary possession of the noble people of the Turkmans"

Based Persian napoleon

Most of his army was turkic not persian

Here's the corrected version: "Dude, Iran is always Iran. People who live on the Iranian plateau are called Iranians. Don't associate the great people of Iran with your ethnicity. If you want to praise Turks, find someone in Turkey.. @@Afshar1

@@foadooo He made army from Azerbaijan, Central Asia, Afghanistan and other lands, not only iran. Afsharids were a turkic empire, not iranian

What? Are you cool, bro? Firstly, last time I checked, Iran has two Azerbaijan provinces! Go check it out, bro. Then, for your information, all those places that you are mentioning (Central Asia, Afghanistan, and Azerbaijan as of now, assuming you're from there!) were part of the Safavid and then Afsharid Empires. Nader was a Shia leader who conquered many places. Also, for your information, he defeated the Ottoman Empire (Turkey-your beloved ethnicity, which I assume you're very proud of) under Topal Pasha in the Battle of Kirkuk. (Link here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topal_Osman_Pasha) And you're saying that the Afsharid Empire was Turkic? What are you talking about? We never had a Turkic empire; we never had such a thing. Please educate yourself, and instead of talking about divisive ethnic standpoints, learn some history......@@Afshar1

@@foadooo there's many turkic empires which fought with each other, so your words has no matter. Safavid, Afsharid and Qajars is turkic empires, i have a lot of sources about it.

😂😂😂 He stole it because Tamoor the Lame desecrated Ferdowsi’s tomb

@@reziinho1414 this story has no historical basis behind it. As far as I know, there is no evidence to suggest that Timur ever even visited this person's tomb. Or even mentioned about such person. Just bullshit!

@@reziinho1414 Nader's love for Tamerlane cost him his own life and demise of his kingdom!

They trolled each other

Guy has a clear islamic and anti aryan bias.

Read جهانگشای نادری by Nader's own secretary. He refers to the Pashtun tribes as Afghans (افاغنه) and to their habitat as Afghanistan.

He’s referring to pashtuns

He didnt look torkic

Plus shah is a Persian title.

nader was Persianized and named his children after figures in shahname

Nader shahs capital was also Persian isfahan

@Techtalk2030 , who made Isfahan capital?

He won't ever admit that 😂

No one said he was a merciful ruler 💀

He was king of iran not India

@@reziinho1414 india has seen many unmerciful Muslim rulers

@@mohamda5155 islam is about violence that's the truth no one wants to admit

🇮🇷 💪

Turkic*

@@realIran236 ?

@@Afshar1 Turks are Persians who were attacked by Mongols During the Achaemenid period, Türkiye belonged to the land of Persia You can search in Google

He’s Afghan & his pronunciation is different than others.

@@kabdul9208 he speaks english but his pronunciation of the Ottoman names are wrong.

It's funny how this guy wants to larp as arab as much as possible, every islamist is like that

The true Napoleon of 🇮🇷

your knowledge on history is really weak. durranis were formed by his general ahmed shah abdali (later durrani) after nader had been assasinated.

@@berdigylychrejepbayev7503 yes but duraani family was already powerful and nader did not annex their territory...

he didnt need to annex it. he just wanted their submission@@mrperfect-mh4qm

@@berdigylychrejepbayev7503 submission through warfare is not real submission

tell me when you found real submission of a state into another state@@mrperfect-mh4qm

He wasnt turkic. A turkic looks like the guy in your picture, not him who looked Persian.

“Attempted, rather unconvincingly, to reassure the shah. The friars then presented their gifts, which included a fine illustrated Bible. Abbas opened it by chance at a picture of St Michael brandishing his sword over a prostrate Lucifer. He asked who the vanquished figure was, and on being told it was the Devil, he laughed and said he thought it was the Turk - glancing over at the ambassador as he said this, at the Ottoman pasha, 'for he lost no opportunity to mock them.'"

@@persianguy1524 Besides territorial integrity, two alternative concepts of sovereignty to replace the crumbling dynastic ideal can be discerned in Nadir Shah's negotiations with the Ottomans in the 1730s. Nadir proposed equal relations based, first, on Ottoman recognition of the legitimacy of Twelver Shiism as a fifth school of orthodox Islamic law. And second, he proposed something akin to an ethnic or national concept - equal relations based on Nadir Shah's identity as a member of the noble Turkmen family of peoples." Howard, D. (2017). A History of the Ottoman Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp.192 To justify his stance and claim a common heritage with the Ottomans, he invoked the history of Chinggis Khan: In the time of Chingiz Khan, the leaders of the Turkman tribes, who had left the land of Turan and migrated to Iran and Anatolia, were said to be all of one stock and one lineage. At that time, the exalted ancestor of the dynasty of the ever-increasing state [the Ottoman Empire] headed to Anatolia and our ancestor settled in the provinces of Iran. Since these lineages are interwoven and interconnected, it is hoped that when his royal highness learns of them, he will give royal consent to the establishment of peace between [us]. In a letter presented to the Ottomans after his assumption of the title of shah in 1736 Nadir claimed legitimacy simply as a Turk, stating that “kingship is the ancestral right of the exalted Turkmen tribe.” Thus the rulers of the regional states - the Chinggisid khans of Khiva, the Timurid/Chinggisid Mughals, the Ottomans, and Nadir himself, all had equal legitimacy. Furthermore, in a deliberate attempt to reverse the abandonment of the glorification of Genghis-Khanid descent as a ''branch of the tree of unbelief'' by Ismacil, Nadir tried to revive the pre-Safavid Turkman tribal principles of legitimacy, which had not been given currency since the fifteenth century. In a letter to the Ottoman grand vizier, Nadir states that the dignitaries of Iran gathered in the plain of Mughan "elected our august Majesty to kingship and sovereignty which are the hereditary prerogatives of the noble Turkman tribe." Mulla cAli Akbar, his Mulla-bashi, opens his pan-Islamic sermon in Kufah with the eulogy of Nadir not only as the shadow of God on earth, but also as the scion of the Turkman tree and heir to Genghis Khan. However, after Nadir's death, Safavid descent, often with a marked emphasis on its religious character, remained the most viable ground of legitimacy for rulership. Expectation of the Millennium : Shiìsm in History Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. State University of New York Press pp.194

@@persianguy1524 Despite his obscure background, he looked born for the throne. Nature endowed him with all the great qualities that make heroes ... His dyed beard made a sharp contrast with his completely gray hair; his natural physique was strong, tall, and his waist was proportional to his growth; his expression was gloomy, with an oblong face, an aquiline nose and a beautiful mouth, but with his lower lip protruding forward. He had small penetrating eyes with a sharp and piercing gaze; his voice was rude and loud, although he knew how to soften it on occasion, as required by personal interest... Dalrymple, William; Anand, Anita (2017). Koh-i-Noor: The History of the World's Most Infamous Diamond. Bloomsbury Publishing. pp. 48-60. Sounds Turkic 🤣🤣🤣🤣

@@persianguy1524 most of yours looks similar to Indians but still Claims to be Indo European ☕️☕️☕️

Ethnic cleansing of turks?

@@persianguy1524 Of Sufis and Shias. Maliki Sufis were the dominant type of Islam in Arabia and Shia made the majority of eastern Arabia before his Conquests.

He wasn’t the only commander who fought their, there was multiple other Pashtun and even Arab Generals who played a big role in that war. He was overrated by the west because they wanted him to rule instead of taliban.

@@user-dl5ln3wd6f I would disagree with you comment, just because he was the only commander, who fought off nine Soviet major assault on panjshir and Soviets never captured his base on third of the Soviet casualties were as a result of his attacks performed the northern alliance on both other tribes and ethnic group into one he was also respected and loved by his enemies and his friends during 1998, when all the other commanders like you’ve mentioned, left and run away from Afghanistan, he was the only true commando or a leader who stayed in Afghanistan for the whole time till his assassination, and never left this country as people

No hes not gonna make a vid cause hikmat is pashtun

Hikma is pashtun. Doubt hell make a vid about him

عنوانو دیدم پشمام ریخت 😂

@@mahdi-oe6mk type in english then laugh.

He had planned to conquer both China and Europe before his untimely demise. Man's ambition had no bounds. There was no man as bold as Nader in his time. سکه بر زر کرد و نام سلطنت را در جهان نادر ایران‌زمین و خسرو گیتی‌ستان

😂😂🤌🤌👌

They should be praying that the Afshar empire should not be reincarnated then lol

چی میگی کصخل

If true, based Afghans. Iran and its proxies has been a curse for the modern Middle East. Just ask the refugees.

@@Qoral-ef5rz Was it Iran or Shia Islamists.Iran has faced two massive uprising in the last four years and Islamists survived barely each time.if the progressive forces overthrew the Islamists,given the experience with Islamism,Iran is going to be the most secular state in the world even more secular than French lacite. Every opposition parties from far left to center right is talking ,and has planned for years to deislamisize Iran in every aspect Icluding: Society, culture, economy and politics. So CHILL!

who cares about what some leftists dream. even the progressives won iran cant be more secular than turkish. you can try but you would fail just like others before you had failed. sociology of the given culture should be well understood before claiming such bullshit. @@Ramtin-Blue_rose

I'm from mazandaran and i've got to say khorasan is one of the most cultured part of Iran but the fact that you're using the kurdish flag icon , are you a separatism ?? because kurds of iran are still iraninan .

@@ashkanmz5504 have you ever travelled to Khorasan ??? It's hard to even find signs of life , do you have any idea about Gold mines and Oil ??? Where is it !!!

He was azerbaijani from afshar tribe qirqlu branch.Firstly create country to steal someone history,notexistent

@@EldarMustafayev728 how you relate it to Azerbaijan , do you even know the distance 😂😂😂 and guess what, there is no turk at Khorasan , mostly Kurd and afghans , and funny thing , Azerbaijan has always been a part of Iran and russia , like a doll being played by these two 😂😂😂 the Afsharyd family are still alive and I'm one of them , come to Khorasan and find some signs of him being a turk , come , waiting for you

@@EldarMustafayev728 oh , and i forgot , God is also a Turk , Legends say even Zeus and Gods of Olympus were Turk , deeper legends say even Gods of norse were Turk 😃😃😃 Even Mohammed was talking in Turkish with Allah 😂😂😂

An old tale. "Man has dominated man to his harm."

war is war napoleon did the same and he is revered its not inflicting pain its how war was back then

@@Houthiandtheblowfish What did Napoleon achieve? He marched around Europe, killed hundreds of thousands directly, more through disease and famine, and all for nothing. France started with a king, they had a violent revolution that set up a republic, Napoleon took power from the republic, then he was defeated and they put another king on the throne. What for? Pointless violence, all for nothing. Man has dominated man to his harm.

@@EcclesiastesLiker-py5ts i agree i see him as city of london bankers proped him up a war lord to conquer russia however i see nader as ruthless ruler who brought modern miltary and invented new ways of war and device called zanburak technique and a competant person gaining the shah king title by deeds not by blood line and fighting off foreign invaders from russia to ottomons to uzbeqs and arabs

@@Houthiandtheblowfish Wait, London supported Napoleon? Napoleon fought against Britain, why would they fund their enemy?

Whats some thing so violent that hindus did?

Hindus become violent today bcz of continuous invasion of muslims and so many bloodshed of common PPL just bcz they worship idols 😢

Yes he did. Dagestan can be a difficult place to conquer...

@@HikmaHistory I lived in Dagestan. When I was at school we studied the history of Dagestan. There they studied this conquest and how much grief it brought to the people. I also visited the local museum. And there was Nadir Shah's saber. But I think that she was not real.

​@@Marat_2023_Husnutdinov It's Not Sabar The Name Of Sword is Shamshir Which Means Lion Tail His sword is kept in a "Naderi Museum" in Mashhad. Mashhad was his capital, which now is second largest city in Iran !!! Also We Are Friends With Dagestani City Of Derbant Is Built By Iranian People and Derbant itself is Iranian Name !!!

Fun fact, dagistan used to be called Koohistan, the istan part is still Persian but dag is mountain for turkic.

Name change occurred when ottomans invaded dagestan later

There was nothing turkic about him. He looked Iranian and Persian not turkic mongol

​​​@@persianguy1524About the Turkic origin of Nader Shah Afshar and the Afsharid dynasty: "Born in November 1688 into a humble pastoral family, then at its winter camp in Darra Gaz in the mountains north of Mashad, Nāder belonged to a group of the Qirqlu branch of the Afšār Turkmen. Beginning in the 16th century, the Safavids had settled groups of Afšārs in northern Khorasan to defend Mashad against Uzbek incursions." "Nāder's focus on common Turkmen descent likewise was designed to establish a broad political framework that could tie him, more closely than his Safavid predecessors, to both Ottomans and Mughals. When describing Nāder's coronation, Astarābādi called the assembly on the Moğān steppe a quriltäy, evoking the practice of Mughal and Timurid conclaves that periodically met to select new khans. In various official documents, Nāder recalled how he, Ottomans, Uzbeks, and Mughals shared a common Turkmen heritage. This concept for him resembled, in broad terms, the origin myths of 15th century Anatolian Turkmen dynasties. However, since he also addressed the Mughal emperor as a "Turkmen" ruler, Nāder implicitly extended the word "Turkmen" to refer, not only to progeny of the twenty-four Gozz tribes, but to Timur's descendants as well." - Encyclopædia Iranica, Nāder Shah

@@theheroickhan “Attempted, rather unconvincingly, to reassure Nader shah. The friars then presented their gifts, which included a fine illustrated Bible. Abbas opened it by chance at a picture of St Michael brandishing his sword over a prostrate Lucifer. He asked who the vanquished figure was, and on being told it was the Devil, he laughed and said he thought it was the Turk - glancing over at the ambassador as he said this, at the Ottoman pasha, 'for he lost no opportunity to mock them.'"

@@persianguy1524 What does iranian look like? and What does Persian look like? What anatomical features make someone look like as iraqian and parsian?

oh come onnnnnn dont rewrite history. all he did was for turks, his tribe is turkic, everything about him is known to everyone.@@persianguy1524

Turan comes from the Shahnameh, and in it it has nothing to do with turks.

They werent. Not even ottomans were turkic and constantly insulted turks

@@persianguy1524 you seems to know more then the historians & those books they written.

​@@kabdul9208 Most of South Asia in the 18th century was under the Marathas who were Indian

@@indiafirst3676 where you I did mentioned 18th century?

@@kabdul9208 Nader Shah was in the 18th century