*"Military style" you leftist are a bunch of dumbasses, you're aware that handguns are used in 85% of mass shootings? Knives kill more people than rifles.*

@Kidd’ Tweek yeah this was in the making she was just waiting for an excuse to disarm the people of New Zealand!

@@themagicloaf8327 Leftists are not dumb. They are evil and they don't want to understand.

@@themagicloaf8327 LOL .. NOT in NZ they aren't! Hand guns have always been banned here. Long before this happened. This story is about NZ, not shoot-em-up America. Knives do NOT kill more people than rifles. The USA averages approx 40,000 killed by guns each year, do you have 41,000 killed by knives too? Yeah thought not. You ARE AWARE of who the dumbass is now eh?

@ more people are killed by alcohol than guns each year, why don't they ban alcohol?

I’m on an eternal quest to find an anti gun argument that Isn’t completely stupid

It always amaze me how angry these gun owners get around this topic..lol

@Ginger Baker lol wait? That's already been happening to thousands of people.

@@dodahbay7313 no shit

Me, see how many Libtards are here

That is impossible. if the shooter wanted to cause accurate damage he wouldn't fire full auto and in the murders he fired semi automatic weapons.

No he fired those rifles on semi auto, if he did fire full auto he would not have the same practical aim.

Max Daniel it’s a reference from a communist politician in California. Kevin DeLeon

@@xxP1ST0LER0xx ahhhhh I understand

Yes siiir very dangerous I would buy one if I were you better to match them than to not 😋bang 💥🔥

Which is why it shall not be repealed or infringed apon

Gunz>kids 🇺🇲

and a lot of muskets and flintlocks

Huh considering the last three presidents your statement is false

@@whylife5339 How was Barrack a tyrant?

Joe Ballengee more guns aren’t the solution but more cops with a ton of guns is?

Welcome to the rest of world. Except shithole countries in the middle east.

Yeah so they can show up to the scene 20 minutes after the act and walk around flashing them.

Mr.Doverfield when is the last time a cop, or any government member, massacred a group of its own citizens? Your fears are illogical #guncontrollnow

Matt_CO in New Orleans, during Katrina

Any firearm considered to be semi automatic/automatic and bares the shape of an assault rifle is automatically seen as a military style weapon in New Zealand.

Don't even get me started on australia's gun laws...

Sorry you might know it as an "assault rifle". Common mistake.

@@RuffProfesional calling them assault rifles is the common mistake, attack rifle is something new entirely

@dogboydesigns see you there.

@@RuffProfesional Semi automatic rifles in intermediate cartridges are sporting rifles, not attack nor assault rifles.

@@RuffProfesional "assault rifles" were not legal in New Zealand nor are they currently legal in the US so why bring them up?

Still a privilege here in the U.S. hence to why we don't allow felons and mongoloids to buy them.

@@Sandlin22people seem to think that calling things a "right" on paper suddenly makes it unalienable. Lol.

@@Sandlin22 Not comparing criminals with law abiding citizens. That's a regulation of the law.

Sandlin22 I think you would agree voting is a right, but felons can’t do that.

Arnold 0 they only have about 600 rifles turned in or taken back

AmazingGoldfish Exactly haha. These people don’t even know how to ban a specific gun without banning all of them!!

These ppl dont know shit about guns, how they function, or homicide statistics.. I think that should be mandatory for any politician that wants the change laws

Yeah i dont know what the point of even saying that was. I guess people could still have pump shotguns lever action and of course bolt action.. Nah ill take semi auto handgund shotty and assualt and battery rifle

@@coulsontodd7222 wtf is "battery rifle" ?

Have you ever heard of a single shot cuz?

Very true, like drinking and driving. It's illegal and people do it.

Devyn Tucker . That’s not the point. In The 70s there weren’t any laws against the driving under the influence until Remove Intoxicated Drivers (RID) started pushing for laws against it. Deaths went from 25,000 to 10,000. Also in 74% of mass shootings the gun was obtained legally. Because when you make something easier to do it happens more.

@@Devyn_LV that is litteraly the dumbest thing ive ever heard in my live. So you actually want to argue that when drinking and driving would be allowed less people would do it ? This is litteraly a Country argument. People where drunk driving so they forbitt it. And almost nobody does it. Thats the point.

The scope of people that benefit are greater than right?

No decent hunter or recreational firearms user needs a semi-automatic weapon. If you want to shoot a wild animal, learn how to aim and fire one round from a bolt-action rifle.

Think about this for a moment. Obviously, this weapon system has not been invented yet. If it were available, should a citizen own a weapon that could destroy a small building? I don't think so. So, if the AR-15 or AK-47 were invented today, should citizens be allowed to own one?

Jon Lee I can own fertilizer, I can own gasoline. Hell, I could order nuclear material online and make a bomb.

Jon Lee the citizens should have whatever the govt may own.

@@thetreeofliberty8636 So a citizen should be allowed to own an MK19 or M240? Flamethrowers? Swimming pools, movie stars?

Jon Lee yes all firearms, yes swimming pools, not movie stars... slavery is anti personal liberty

what kind?

Facts

_ɗɳลミʞㄥ尺 See I think that was meant as an insult, but honestly, I’ve a lot of coursework to do tomorrow, and death surely is a way out of that

What else to expect from a carcinogenic site such as this one?

That's how most vice comment sections go

Brenton tyrant lol

Psychopath who uses illegally obtained firearms to attack innocent people. Solution. Let's disarm all law-abiding citizens to render them defenseless because clearly you're 10 round capacity laws prevented this man from bringing in multiple 30 round magazines

better yet, let's stage it... anyone even saw any blood? There's no forensic evidence but their word. If somehow the people found out it's false they aren't responsible for real deaths.

Well this is NZ but yeah they can't ban guns in usa

@@melonheaded Funny thing is they could, they 100% could. They banned machine guns in 1936, why not semi-auto guns?

@@sykessaul123 Machine guns are not banned in the US. They are taxed.

USA citizens don't have the balls lol

@@sykessaul123 pistols too?

It doesn't take that long.

In today world... you can try regulated weapon but you can do much.... Politician just love to talk...

@dogboydesigns yep

do you want to loose a finger or an eye? because that's how you do it.

It's actually so easy to build one

five evil people a gun he kill 10 or so give him or her a sub automatic he killed 20-50 people. give him a knife goodluck

Right ht?! And it going to create more gun violence anyway.

Anonymous I like how the government solution it to take away people’s property to only create more violence themselves.

Mr.Doverfield But hold on, I don’t think NZ have any gangs in there country. If there isn’t any gang, then I’m pretty sure people will be alright. If I’m not mistaken.

Glizzy Does NZ have any gang?

@@DaveVillarreal98 they exist and for examples like black power, mongrel mob, bandidos, tribesmen, etc...

Ban all attack mobiles

Ban the civic as well those are pretty gay

"Fully automatic Honda Accord

Or we could ban drunk drivers...

Or we could ban alcohol.

Yeah that whole video is therefore not valid

Thomas Boulet No, the second amendment makes it invalid to me. I don't live in New Zealand. Lol. You have to admit that these people have no idea what they are talking about right? "Attack guns"? Come on. It's hilariously stupid.

​@@SolosSpirit Don't care the law is already set. Not even my country so I could care less

@wolfsmaul-GER no she meant an actual revolving gatling gun that makes a round like motion.

She should be fired for being that stupid. But because everyone is stupid it's ok. Crazy.

It wipes things away. Like human lives.

A type of weapon called a whip. Wip-en. Hahaha

@@PW218 🤦

Also what is deeth?

What's a murka

I got a kilo of cocaine, would you have your knickers in a knot if the cops took it from me?

brin Joness but kilos of coke are illegal are they not😑

Yes they need their guns in case the Kiwi's ever become nazis LMAO.

Well the law changed, and laws can change. Stop being against the law. By that logic I should be allowed to own anything acquired before the law banned them including drugs, chemical weapons and other bullshit.

No matter how you cut it Coke is death so yeah they have a right to take it away 🤑

No one cares you can’t even control covid in you own country. What a joke.

@@100ccollier k

@@100ccollier stfu😂

caleb collier bruh not having the 2nd amendment is the biggest joke ever 🤣

@@100ccollier A joke like your sex life

Because the shooter worked for the Left wing party.

And? If he asked to ban the cigarettes would it be bad to do it? You dumb? Banning guns is good, no matter who advocates for it

TheCreaterKeygen this comment tells me that you have not read his manifesto.

@@inquaanate2393 His manifesto is not publicly available. Reading it would entertain his desires.

@@shhmule clearly you are unable to use a browser if you think it is not available.

They didn't ban guns based on cosmetics? They banned based on RPM, and magazine capacity. You can still have fun and self protection with pistols, bolt action rifles, and shotguns. If a government specifically wanted to kill you, they would bomb you with a drone strike; owning a semi or fully-auto weapon would not protect you.

It's not the cosmetics of the gun that make it dangerous, it's the function of it. Being able to fire multiple rounds in quick succession has no valid use in any country not embroiled in a civil war. Bolt-action rifles and double barrelled shotguns should be the only legal firearms as they are used for valid hunting reasons. Small calibre, small magazine handguns and semi-auto rifles used for actual sporting reasons should also be allowed but only in secure lockups in shooting centres. If you're using a gun for 'fun' then you're an idiot and clearly don't respect the weapon or what it was invented to do.

Erik Liubakka sorry 😐 you’re wrong and anyone can prove it. California has banned cosmetic features like folding stocks, adjustable stocks and forward vertical grips. Nothing to do with RPM. Second that’s not how wars work. The government cannot just bomb 🇺🇸 citizens on U.S. soil for a number of reasons. Not the least of which is try convincing OUR military to kill people they were brainwashed into protecting. How many military members would refuse orders to bombs protesting citizens. Learn more please.

WeirdestWolf actually you’re just narrow minded. You don’t respect this topic enough to do even basic research. I hope you learn more about guns and their uses rather than parrot small-minded propaganda. Actually listen to pro-gun people. Bet you can’t rationally tear down their arguments. That’s why I’m pro-gun now. They have better arguments for their position. Sorry

@@erikliubakka6514 "They didn't ban guns based on cosmetics? They banned based on RPM" - okay, what RPM did they pick as the limit, then? "magazine capacity" - magazines are just boxes with springs. You can weld multiple magazines together, or even 3d print them.

People who support gun ownership are pretty delusional

^^^ and so it begins 😂

No one supports that type of Government. It's just what happens... the average Joe has to comply whether they like it or not. They never had any power and never will have.

Ok and?

Johan Daniel Alvarez Sanchez “People who support gun ownership are delusional” People who support disarmament of law abiding citizens because the government says its a good thing are idiots.

1 year and nothing

no. we just dont want law abiding citizen's being punished for a dumbcunts doing

😂 yea Get a helmet your safety is none of my mf concern people say all lives matter I say your dam life is on you( all lives don't matter) now f off you child who wants the government to control you 😂

yeah so?

Why be sad for your enemy

Cal Caliente fr

Shouting “this is America” as a response to New Zealand protecting its citizens over its gun enthusiasts is peak idiocy.

@Austin T. How many lives did those laws save on the day in question?

Austin T. Leaving then defenseless? You can’t defend yourself without a lethal weapon? Is pepper spray not defense, tasers? Do you not have police?

DeshaunIsAmazing not in Britain you cant keep up its a slippery slope first its guns then knifes and pepper spray

banning people with a history of violence against others from owning guns would do more than banning types of guns. people who use guns to intentionally kill others usually have a history of unjustified violence, including terrorizing intimate partners who try to leave. also, this particular gunman posted his extremist views to his Facebook account regularly. Facebook uses algorithms to track our internet usage and promote custom ads to its users on an insanely personal scale; there is no reason they cannot use such an algorithm to pick up when someone is using their site to advocate violence against others. if only the company cared about human lives half as much as it does profiting off of them.

@TominBach I believe it's more we're selling the Saudis weapons they are bombing Yemen with. An important distinction.

why have traffic laws at all? just ban killing, im sure nobody will ever speed or drive recklessly again. in fact, get rid of every law except the killing one. obviously everything will work perfectly if left like that.

@CountJimbo that's not the point at all. Laws are what we use to justify the use of state force to bring people to justice. If you advocate for a law that uses force against a person who isn't doing any harm that's pretty foul. Certain crimes are harmful, other crimes are victimless.

@CountJimbo why? Because you're refusing to think? You have free speech. You could use free speech for libel, slander or even to spread propaganda that gets people killed. We punish you when you commit crimes with your speech, but we don't make speech illegal. We have many household chemicals that are poison. But we only punish you if you put them in someone's food. We don't make ownership of chemicals illegal. The question at hand here is that people should not be punished for the mere act of owning weapons, but you people are comparing it to murder and pretending we don't want a law against murder.

they won't miss you

@@fickdichgoogle8618 Likewise

best you dont come

@dogboydesigns damn if you were gonna mention Clinton I would have figured youd have mentioned the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban where semiautomatic "military style" weapons were banned in America up until 2004.

Theirs definitely not the same amount of boating accidents compared to gun violence in the US. Find a better argument.

@@polaroidsofpolarbears365 whoosh

Swamp Ape Gun Violence?

Your mother said you were an accident. But nobody banned her from the street corner.

Swamp Ape lol 😂 u don’t even get the reference

Paul Robinson they won’t get the guns back

Fuckin' A.

Best comment here my friend

Ian Cornell you people are already subjects in the way you mindlessly worship Trump.

@@Colddirector I don't think you understand the definitions here lol

@@Colddirector ur the only one who brought up trump...

Be N S O N mindless worship of Trump? Aww it’s cute you think Trump is pro gun

Bulk Logan Boogaloo

Another idiot who doesn't know the meaning of irony.

Moron he is a police officer not a killer

Yes, what a moron. Good for the New Zealand government to take a stand and nip this in the bud! I hope that more countries do the same! There is absolutely no reason for your average citizen to attain and own an assault rifle.

@@shovons Bill of Rights not Bill of Needs.

I don’t follow the logic. If police can have a type of gun then everyone should? Police are allowed to have sirens and flashing light, that means everyone should be able to have them?

Police don't get to take their guns home.

@@_Atzin they are allowed to take them to your home

@@thawhiteazn the logic is that there is a class of citizens with more rights than you and a power differential from the government that begets authoritarian violence without fear of consequences.

arogers except that civilian gun ownership justifies greater militarization of the police. Police are far less militarized in places like the UK, Germany, Australia, Japan, and so on. These countries are just as free as we are. Arguably more free since they don’t lock up and imprison such a significant percentage of their populations. Your argument falls completely flat when faced with reality.

They hide in plain sight but often behind a podium.

It does disarm criminals. The largest source of illegal firearms is the legal market, if you restrict one you restrict the other. It has worked in virtually every country where it has been tried.

They want to turn NZ into a police state dictatorship.

There a thing called resenable gun regulations. America's gun model clearly doesn't work

Wait....what? A rational comment? Please don't tease us with reason. :) Indeed, disarming is only for show, we now it won't stop the mental issues that cause such hatred. It is a hard issue to deal with

NZ is a much different and much smaller place than the US, it certainly has as much capacity to work as it has to not work. Only time will tell at this point. The refreshing part about this is that they actually did something as opposed to just letting people die in mass shootings for decades.

no!

@@l0wrid3r88 You dirty dirty dirty dog, you can't take my guns!!

Maryam Hussain everyone’s so busy talking about the gun debate that I’m glad someone said this

Yes, infringe of peoples right by passing feel good laws

That’s actually not quite true. Police in NZ get access to a Glock and an M4 semi auto. While private citizens here can still own fully functioning machine guns.

OK so the cops own semis just like we can. In nz we can own a full auto rifle or smg it's just you need a c license. Even after the shooting you need one and can still get the rifles

They should and it works. The UK banned automatic firearms after a school shooting there hasn't been one yet , Australia restricted firearms after a mass shooting and there hasn't been one since.

@@grant1133 How are the stabbings over there? Doing well?

@@grant1133 the UK didn't ban "automatic firearms" after a school shooting... It banned centre fire (and later rim fire also) *handguns* after the school shooting in Dunblane, Scotland in 1996.. It banned centre fire, semi-automatic rifles around 8 years previously following the 1987 massacre in Hungerford.

@@shadowdrift5574 40 % reduction in knife crime in the past 10 years, so yeah , thanks for asking.

@@grant1133 ur acting like there aren't stabbing in the UK almost everyday. All those stabbing deaths probably add up to more than the UK mass shooting death rate. And now they want to get rid of pointy knives...

Benjamin Franklin, I believe.

And V from V for Vendetta lol

Then you should also not allow any government intervention in your life. Join your local anarchists if you truly believe that.

@@toppie34 You can be against Anarchy and be pro-small government at the same time. It doesn't have to be either one extreme or the other.

@@stefanmarshall5689 exactly. People love to polarize every topic imaginable in politics

Without guns Yeah okay, buddy

FBI Right?!

Phentin Creating Gun Control will make more Gun violence.

The US already had an essentially similar ban on assault rifles and high capacity magazines from 1994 to 2004. There was no Civil War.

1000000%

you can still have fun and sport with them. in the same sense that cars arent toys they can still have fun with them

@@4doorsmorewhores298 except cars cant fire a hundred round in ten seconds

@@magdalena_dewinter this comment shows you know nothing about firearms

Guns is privileged not a right

@@whylife5339 In the united state it is

Speaking Truth all the overweight middle Americans think they can shoot sickness away

@Speaking Truth because Guns were more important than healthcare (that didn't exist) during the revolutionary war. Also unlike healthcare, guns are a private investment that is optional. However Healthcare Is neccessary and far more expensive than owning a one time purchase. It's not about morals friend. It's about practically.

@Speaking Truth The dynamic between guns and healthcare never changed, we only grew out of the need to actively defend ourselves like a third world country. You also missed the main idea, Guns are paid for by an individual and never again, meanwhile healthcare is not. Healthcare is paid by the masses continuously, and is far more expensive than the right to own a gun. If anything healthcare is a privilege, and always has been while weapons were a requirement all throughout human history. Ironically if you have the most guns you tend to have better healthcare than those around you.

Nadia 168 health care isn’t in the constitution. Probably because I’m not entitled to other peoples labor. I’m armed and health insured. Being armed means I can insure my safety and the safety of my family to the best of my abilities. That’s a right everyone should have.

"losing a whole army of gun confiscators in 28 days"

Then why do you watch? Go find something else to watch.

In the hopes they might make awesome content like they used to.. Going into dangerous areas, interviewing crazy/interesting people, showing other parts of the world you wouldn't normally see. Now it's just all political bullshit and PC nonsense. If you like this garbage idk what to tell you, shitty taste I guess.

dylyn blue I think it’s interesting to se a more in depth in what happened in NZ since it’s sensitive to what happens in other places as well

remember to listen; they are just reporting. We choose to hear what we want to hear

This video was fine. They showed what is happening in NZ, not what you want to happen in NZ

no

Say that when someone has you and is putting something into your body that you don't enjoy.

In NZ only police has guns but people that aren't police doesn't have guns

@@ninjapirate123 if you or someone you love is ever violently murdered right in front of you I hope the thought that eventually a Police Officer with a firearm may one day discover the crime scene is of some small comfort to you or them or hopefully both. Meanwhile here in a free country I'll sleep well knowing me & mine have the tools and skills to take care of each other. I don't know from where you developed your interesting perspective but having had a career in law enforcement behind me does NOT instil any great faith in that institution.

@@r.shanethompson7933 And what country do you live in?

New Zealand has a population one tenth that of California alone.

Assault magazines Haha do they have laser sights lol. Do they call in air strikes no...lol

Standard capacity*

You mean like they did with tha abomination known as tha drug war...tha single most fascist policy supported by a majority of tha populace and almost no one is saying anything.

The only thing I know is that on that day many innocent people lost their lives and family's got torn apart. Reason enough for me.

Communists laugh as they take away your rights and souls energy.

@@SgtTurret he was leftist. so become more letists?

@@thagodwecreate5179 I agree with you on this, the drug war (especially against marijuana) was a fear tactic by the government

Once self-driving cars or better transport options are available?

When they can kill 50 people under 5 min idiot

Soon apparently.

@@lulu1night4ever ????? Lmao. Someone drives their car through a parade

How to learn from mistakes and save lives

What did they gain ?

the NRA was in this video ?

The rest of the world is not America. Not everybody worships guns.

@@sodapopinski3208 Not really, the guns used by the perpetrator are already not available to the public to begin with. The law passed is repetitive, useless and pretty much just a PR move.

@Haakon Apparently you've never heard of the right of self-preservation. Also, have you ever read the Federalist Papers? How about the writings of George Washington or Thomas Jefferson on civilian gun ownership? They talk about the importance of citizens owning ARMS. Not muskets, and not for sporting or hunting purposes. Arms cover all weapons and ammunition. So yes, law abiding citizens should own the same arms as a standing army.

@Haakon I never said that citizens can defeat a standing army. I was pointing out the fact that the right exists and the Constitution protects it. "Weapons as powerful and portable as light machine guns were simply inconceivable." That's simply incorrect. In the 1770s and even earlier there were weapons capable of "rapid fire" such as the Organ Gun, Puckle's, Mitrialleuse, Nock Gun and so on. If you move into the 1800s there are literally countless examples, including actually machine guns. So yeah, they understood the difference between hunting and sporting firearms, and military arms. Moreover, citizens in the 1770s owned more than just firearms. They owned all different types of arms, including artillery, which incidentally, were used in the Revolutionary War. The fact that you're talking about a firearm capable of "killing 30 people before needing to reload" shows your lack of understanding as it pertains to firearms and firearms related statistics. Furthermore, you may want to read up on defensive and violent attacks. Because knife attacks are extremely brutal and deadly. Also, according to the FBI more Americans are killed by knives than all rifles, and that includes those scary "assault weapons."

2nd mosque had a gun. Dude stopped and fled.

Didn't one person in mosque number two have a gun?

@@justinm2697 nope he grabbed it from the attacker and couldn't figure out how to fire it.

@@killacamfoo nope grabbed it from attacked and couldn't figure out how to fire it.

@@_Atzin There are plenty of ways to do that without a gun. If people are exposed to guns, and they know how to operate them and be safe around them maybe more of these mass shooters would be taken out long before they went on their rampage. It really seems like the only solution with guns being so prevalent on this planet.

Is the round thing that is like a Gatling gun? I don't even know what the correct terms are but I know that is nothing like a Gatling gun. And that woman is the head of police. I imagine her saying it like a valley girl....like it's a round thing and its totes like a Gatling gun thingy, like, totally.

In smaller caliber rounds some of those drums can hold that many rounds or more... theres some fully auto .22s that hold 200 rounds.

@@justinpipes85 the weapon shown isn't 22 lr and doesn't hold more than 75 rounds.

@@makeintoschuI know this. The o.p. said they didnt know of any "130 rounders..." all I'm saying is that they do exist. Not in the caliber shown of course but they are out there.

@Luke L. Ban human life. That solves all of it. Defeatism doesn't work and neither does taking away people's right to self defense.

Well since it doesn't work lets make murder legal.

Statistically insignificant, they will be much safer. The more hurdles the less likely crazy and radical terrorists will be armed. Look at every other civilised nation. The American gun death statistics are abnormal and not normal

@@arcticwulf5796 how many of those gun-deaths are of criminals and in self-defense? remove the gun you will now have knife-deaths, screwdriver-deaths or hammer-deaths, will you ban the hammers and screwdrivers next? people have been killing each other since the dawn of man with stones and bones, and in greater numbers when there has been a power differential by superior armament like how now there will be between law-abiding citizens, criminals or the goverment which maybe is good willed but can be taken by a future psychopath.

@@andresrogersa false, a dumb point and doesn't hold up to reality and real life statistics.

@@arcticwulf5796 why don't you prove it then

Brendan Frieders Harvard has studied and concluded there is NO correlation between number of guns and the murder rate of nations. Your statement has ZERO weight or basis in reality.

Brendan Frieders damn, whys you have to do em like that 😂

​@Brendan Frieders What does this insult have to do with what he said? You havn't refuted his point

@Brendan Frieders 😁😁👍

“Moderate” translation: Fudd

I'm ashamed that people have such little concern for their personal freedoms.

Justin M You aren’t free if your neighbour suppresses your freedom to live a peaceful life without threats.

@@napoleonibonaparte7198 This has nothing to do with neighbours though. This is about the government and your silly statement about people preferring guns over lives.

I like how people prefer feeling over facts.

So not act at all and just wait for the next shooter? Moron!

@@l0wrid3r88 no, how about actually making a thorough and well thought of reform that would prevent people like that shooter from getting a gun, instead of a thoughtless blanket ban that takes away the firearms from the people who did nothing wrong and will never commit a crime like this/

The first 2 CC members to be killed were by Drone strike in the Middle East. Put 2 and 2 together.

Yea that gave me chills knowing exactly where all the body’s where in that mosque

Tarrant was a commie, nevr 4get z🥰

They are getting their money back..

​@@88Expertyou fool I don't care for money but for my mf right something that you people will never get back 😂 the clowns that live on earth

2nd amendment rights are for the USA only. We don't have the right to bare arms for protection here in New Zealand. You need to get a gun license before legally owning a gun here. The license includes a mental health check, criminal check, meet with police etc. If you mention that you want a gun for self defense police will decline the application.

Kyber762 nope what you say was that the terrible actions of a single are not enough to apply regulation and control on everyone. Mine was an analogy

Ares IV ok? The point is that nobody needs such high capacity magazines for non war purposes.

Daiku Coffee What a police chief/chairperson whatever should also know, is that the capacity of the magazine I have on my rifle, in a case, secured, tucked away, is none of her business and that‘s the point. It could be 7 rounds, it could be 30, it could be 50. The state has no right to meddle with the legal property of a law-abiding citizen with no criminal background. Plain and simple. Also gattling guns were last used on a large scale in WW1 idk that‘s pretty embarassing.

@@FinsterCS still have multi barrel cannons on a lot of aircraft. I know they aren't a true "gatling gun" but most people would look at that cannon and say it looks like a gatling gun... all that being said that woman has no idea what shes talking about. Haha.

Daiku Coffee What if a war break out tho? Are you that naive that you honestly can’t envision political revolution occurring in a first-world country?

@@daikucoffee5316 "The point is that nobody needs such high capacity magazines for non war purposes." - how so? 50 Cent got shot 9 times and he's still around. If you get attacked by 3 people (and criminals use numbers to overwhelm victims) and you need 9 shots for each, what kind of magazine should you have? A 5 round one?

Because they’re not gonna stop at semi autos, If they can deceive the public into thinking that a normal semi automatic is a “military style semi automatic” just because of its it’s appearance... whats stopping them from calling a bolt action hunting rifle a “high powered sniper rifle”? Because they look similar . The goal for these politicians is to chip away at every single firearm slowly until theres nothing left

@@alexjurackovich2057 why would someone need a semi automatic rifle for self defence? or hunting? The 9mm Hellcat is perfectly fine for self defence against someone that has no gun on them. I don't see the point in buying an AR-15 and then whenever someone has purchased one and is slammed for it claims it's for self defence?

@@tedwhiting2922 an AR-15 is a fantastic weapon for self-defense *and* hunting a wide variety of game. People can buy them for whatever reason they want.

We don't have that right in new Zealand. If someone brakes into your house. You can not use force to stop them. That's assault if you do. New Zealand is a very left wing county.

@@mvb88 no it's not, it's a liberal shithole lol. Left-wingers want to keep their guns. If this confuses you ask further

@@mvb88 you can use force to stop them kick them in the nuts and the head and then call the cops

@@mvb88 You telling me that if someone breaks in your house that they can do whatever they want as long as they dont touch you?!

@@edwelndiobel1567 correct. All I can do is stand there and call the cops or ask them to stop. Stupid ass laws.

ninjafruitchilled why should they be banned

ninjafruitchilled why I “need” it is none of your business quite frankly. We live in a extremely dangerous world with thousands of ways to possibly die everyday. One day owning one of these firearms may make a lot of sense. If we experience a total government shutdown or a military coup, I bet you’ll wish you would have thought differently.

@@LAXERJK A speculative anarchist future scenario is a ridiculous argument for legalising these sort of weapons now. If you want to lead some sort of ludicrous prepper lifestyle then go right ahead, but society has no obligation to let you have every ridiculous thing you want for that goal.

ninjafruitchilled oh I’m not speculating, I’m just giving you “ a reason”. All I’m gonna say is if people actually cared about the lives of children, their would be a push to ban alcohol, fund cancer and heart diseases, and certainly not a push and legalize marijuana. And to get something straight, I think people should live freely and have access to things they enjoy. These weapons do not pose a serious risk to everyday life just like alcohol, even though they both can have negative consequences. We as a society have basically decided that the right to drink alcohol out weighs the deaths of DUI related underage deaths.

@@LAXERJK Pointing out that other dangerous things are not banned is not an argument. Indeed perhaps alcohol *should* be banned. But it isn't the same, because it can be consumed as a perfectly benign drink. And as I pointed out, there are zero legitimate use cases for semi automatic rifles in our present non-apocalyptic world. There is no good reason to let civilians have them. You might as well argue that civilians should be allowed to own their own private nuclear weapons, the logic would be the same.

Did you actually watch that video? It's ridiculous. It's fake! The event was obviously manufactured to further a political agenda. Don't be so gullible.

@@ken1139 are u dumb?

Privileges not rights

Arcticwulf the right to defend yourself should not be a privilege

@@ElChapoDua you can still, but you are literally more likely to die when people got guns. Your kids will more likely shoot you with guns in the house than any criminal breaking in. Societies that don't arm everybody are safer and gun crime and accidents are more deadly. Literally every day people are shot in America, it makes news everywhere else when someone dies in violent crime everywhere else in the industrialized nations.

Articwulf - Every country that has banned guns, has seen their murder and violent crime rates go up. Australia is the only country in the world that claims gun control lowered their murder rate, but their government reporting of crime data is suspect. When you disarm the law abiding and take their means of self defense, more innocent people will be murdered.

@@guncontrolisusingbothhands2331 that is a blatant lie and you know it.

Because a man could have been stopped who committed mass murder. If and only if the people of the mosque were able to defend themselves. Do you not agree a person like the killer deserved a slug to the head before 40+ died?

Because mass shooters don't target places where they could get return fire.

@@maxdaniel4223 Thats the sort of argument that leads to the satirical 'arm the children against school shootings' quips from sacha baron cohen.

@@chriscole344 if there were weapons at school (not arguing they should be) I would rather they be on standby for use against the threat than no capable defense at all. No one sensible says we should "arm the children". I do however agree a child should understand how a firearm operates for their own safety and others. It isn't an argument we should be speculating on more ways we can keep the kids and communities safe. Guns are not "the only" answer but a well placed bullet to the skull/shoulder is a definitive way of stopping a mass murderer.

@Azim Qureshi lol no more dangerous than anywhere in the muslim world for a non muslim

No it really is going to affect them. They can't just walk into a gun store and get what they need for a massacre, they'd have to find and buy from a black market dealer which is going to be 10x more expensive and going to increase the chances of them being caught.

you watch criminals are still going to get them it dossnt matter.

like what?

@@irepmyselfthatsall he’s taken over almost all of the area I live in, his family including extended live in one plot in a community sort of thing, he went to prison in the states now I look at that comment a year ago he’s not controversial as much but very mysterious

Ummm... shoot first 🤷🏽‍♂️

Yeeter Yayeet the same way you will defend yourself from grenades if someone buys one of them off the black market.

Except the gangs

@@craigschofield3222 They need hugs 😂

Both named david. In Australia we had David leyonhjelm fighting for guns it seems that people named david are more likely to have common sense.