Different frequency? Will you be trading your building shaking for 24/7 nails on chalkboard?

@@StopRoguePilotsNow did you watch the video? it's really quiet

When you combine a helicopter and tall buildings then you really will notice how quiet evtol is 👍

@@matthewspry4217 I can feel the helicopter inside my house before I can hear the help, rattles the entire structure, thankfully Helicopters are becoming more rare. Only see Medical, tiny training heli's or Billionaire or two once in a while. I go weeks without hearing helicopters in my area of 8 million. Helicopters have become to expensive for TV/radio stations and most others as well, good time for JOBY. Joby has a bright future barring no big setbacks or FAA issues out of thin air. JOBY recently proved the excitement is building, 79 million shares traded in one day, rocketing JOBY above @11, almost to $12. To all the nay sayers, JOBY is the real deal, innovating for the ages, building now toward a Trillion dollar new industry > 2030. a A Duh moment.

@@MC-yb5le kzfaq.info/get/bejne/l51haryL0861Xac.html I'm skeptical...

I've heard some electric aircraft in Oregon, but in fairness, don't think they were Joby's. The overall decibels are quieter, but they had a horrific high frequency. Imagine a decibel reader in the room with you when your teeth slip against eachother and gives you goosebumps or nails on a chalkboard. Both will barely register on a decibel reader, but both can take you from zero to 60 in a millisecond.

Go see some in action. The one's I've seen (not Joby) had a nails on chalkboard, goosebump inducing high frequency.

Think they don't know? Have you seen and heard them in real life?

Only in flying mode i suppose. But what about takeoff and landing??

@@nicknamenick9448 good question but they’ll be doing that at airports at first. People Don’t want noisy drones flying over our homes all the time.

@@kbkesq at the airport? And what is the purpose to produce them if they will be used only with airport infrastructure? I tend to think they should be more like cars. Parked near the house.

@@nicknamenick9448 most probably from several heliports distributed in the city as the first step for certification.

@@nicknamenick9448 "at the airport? And what is the purpose to produce them if they will be used only with airport infrastructure? I tend to think they should be more like cars. Parked near the house." Well, I can give you one example. Last time (and only time so far) I went to Yosemite National Park here in California. I had a Friday off so I was going to take the train from San Jose to Merced, and then take the bus the next morning. Well, I missed the train in San Jose, and all the flights to Fresno from SF were full. So I ended up taking Greyhound. It takes four or five hours. Which is a downer, because it means I couldn't use that option if I were working Friday. (can't get on Greyhound after work and get to Merced, they don't run late enough). But Joby from San Jose International to Merced Regional Airport would have been great! Probably 30 minutes or so, sleep overnight in a hotel and then go to Yosemite on the YARTS bus the next morning! Or another example...in many cases there are direct flights out of SFO that you can't get out of San Jose, but going from SJ to SFO takes an hour on Caltrain, and if you don't live in downtown, you still have to travel from there to the airport (the airport in SJ is in downtown, or like two miles north). Joby could fly you from SJC to SFO in like ten minutes, then you could get on your SFO flight! :)

Have you seen them in real life? Go see and hear for yourself before promoting... oh yes, less decibels, but... well, just go hear for yourself. Maybe Joby actually got it right, but be prudently diligent in researching what you permit and promote regarding aviation in our communities.

Agreed! Reducing emissions and noise pollution is definitely a mission we can get behind. This video hit home on all fronts.

Thank you for your response. There are several angles I'm looking from here (Just thinking out loud without any claim to be an authority, but I have some thoughts). Innovation, production, regulation, consumer and investor. Innovation: A big plus here but I would like to see a back-up plan for a 2-4 seater also looking at alternative fuel source like Hydro-Nano as an option but if not, this is already good enough for the public to make a choice to purchase IMHO. Production: The race is on so I do understand the choice to go with Uber and their 75 mio investment. Keeping in mind, novelty and accessibility has an edge but being first is not always the biggest long-term victory however many brands have future plans which says nothing about today as experimental vehicles are not guaranteed to make it to the production-line. (See Vahana) Also: What really is in production right now? I know people love to have a glimpse at future options, but many have not opened up to take orders yet. What really is available today if I would like to purchase and at what price? Regulation: This should be looked at so that's also why I am was a bit worried about the involvement by Uber although that has two sides as well. I know it's a task but an advantage can be taken here when the regulations for more countries is available. When for example European Regulation can be less strict based upon technical safety, this would be a big plus when that would be available and CE certified might be the opening to get that done. Consumer: For the consumer novelty, production, commute time, reduced noise pollution, price, maintenance service, fuel, acceptance are important issues. Freedom not being the last in the decision making. Novelty is where the blackfly has an advantage but popular also means short lived and the market will soon look for a more serious concept like Joby or Alia. I doubt the carbon footprint will the a biggest plus looking from the consumers perspective, this is getting into politics and frankly, people don't care to pollute if they have an advantage, depending on social constructs it's nice to be within the realm of public opinion however fuel access is a much bigger issue. One seaters are cool but not very practical for young families with the average of 2 adults + 1-2 children/or a third adult size offspring. (Offering the choice of 2 limited size seats (children) in the back or a single seat (Adult) might be a simple but good advantage. One very big plus would be the integration of solar panels which can be very easily done for on route re-fueling which adds towards the sense of freedom and Range going from a one way trip and back into twice range while recharging for the trip back home. For the more professional use of the craft having a direct connection as the end user with Joby could become the survival in disturbing times for the company long-term. The technical side and the freedom of the company's decision making directly influences the consumer so I'm cautious about big instant lump sums as that doesn't say everything either. Investor: I have this gut feeling this market is similar to the Internet bubble in regards to new inventions, innovation, future prospects, production etc. but with a big difference that if there would be a collapse on the market, the consumer will still want the product although after the first craze the long-term value will become more realistic. For the bigger investors this might become a part of diversification or they are gambling on novelty mid-term or an indirect advantage for the company by adding service in their field to win from the competition. (See ALIA BETA) overall in their company long-term. For the smaller investor this might be interesting short term but overall this seems a new long-term innovation which can be sensitive when it is not directly a technical advantage for the company. The overall innovation changes are less sensitive for practical application but will adapt over time after giving ROI and a new perspective to go from. (Think hydro-power or any other new source which would eliminate the recharging where Range could become ten-twenty times in one refuel, this would not directly influence practical usage for bigger investors having a technical application, for the consumer this would instantly mean a big change as there are other reasons to make a purchase in the emotional sense of freedom) ALIA BETA has the bigger investors behind it but at this point that does not have to be a big neg for Joby as this market is very new so loyalty from any bigger investor might crumble on secondary issues like maintenance/parts or political preference. No matter how big investors are, if the public decides different, they bought a bubble long term where they will opt for land transportation in rural areas. This is also the reason why I think Joby would be smart to have a back-door product which directly deals with the end user which the bigger investors could use to resonate with the market where they B2 type shares or non voting shares would become a lot more interesting for the average investor knowing they have the advantage over big tech. I like Joby a lot - Easy does it. This is a transportation revolution long-term with the face of JoeBen which the consumer can relate to rather than big tech. Do it right the first time and it will be a success for sure. (IMHO) Regards, Hans Stam - Netherlands

That is so true hope the stock works really seriously thinking about buying 1000 years thousand shares

❤😮

So your saying the battery can catch on fire like in an electric car of which you just want to eject out in the sky to land on a home,car,person and damage things? Good lord.

@@user-rr3yw9dn1l is rare but all of batteries can self burn, imagine that in a aircraft. In the next future, all of aircraft must be solve this subject, my solution is simple, project the aircrafts with ejectable batteries (of course with parachutes),. is simple, put the batteries under the aircraft, easy. Aobut safety for commuter vtol crafts, put airbags for outside action (in case of critical control/electric problems). Maybe both simple things can save many lifes.

@@claytonpozzer 😂❤

Lol nah literally quiter because it doesnt have a giant ass engine(s) on it 😂 its electric. Even at idle, strip speed a prop plane is going to be way fkn louder they are open manifold if they arent a turbo jet

@@hondaservicecenter you did not at all get my point.

@@daszieher yes because with that notar or not it still makes more noise cause doesnt have turbofan motor

@@hondaservicecenter you're not making sense at all.

a quick question for ya, is it true people in west coast all have cars and drive everywhere? Just wanna have a sens of the demand in cali

@@jackiezhang2907 nah, major cities have public transit. Although that's going to be vastly changed in coming decades with the advent of self-driving cars and eVTOL electric air taxis. :)

@Hans Stam really well thought out comments here. Jotting this one down as a possible video topic on our channel in the near future to add to our most recent video on Joby. Uber has shown that it is a company capable of scaling worldwide and battling the regulatory challenges associated with it. Being backed by Uber is a major competitive advantage to seeing this mission to fruition, however as you noted, there could be potential complications. The fact that Uber had confidence to make this type of investment shows that Joby is at the forefront of the eVTOL revolution. Interested to hear more of your thoughts on the subject!

Lets not confuse different categories and use cases of eVTOL designs and company financing solutions...

$45K USD?!! I think you dropped a zero.

Yeah that will never happen, especially with inflation. Plus you can buy so many actual capable airplanes in that price range.

It is meaningless if the takeoff weights are different, one is big and the other is small.

Great suggestions! I'm sure they will add this to their content calendar in the near future. Looking forward to seeing this too!

Helis appeared to not be hovering, but rather in straight and level flight. So, yeah, complete honest. Look at the video again.

@@maxj0930 Try to understand what I was saying. I'm saying that we would need to hear theirs in hover as well.

@@DanFrederiksen Hi -- if you look at other videos on our channel, we've posted demonstrations of the acoustics in take-off and hover. This video, however, is specifically focused on overhead flight noise, and our aircraft is in wing-borne flight (as depicted) when flying overhead. Yes, that lowers its noise signature -- that's the point!

@@briangarrett-glaser3241 This is the first with any reference. You can do another video comparing hover. I'd think that particularly compared to a helicopter setting down you should have distinct advantage so that seems like an obvious demo. Remember to have people or equiv weight in it.