and it'll be an alien force coming to kill us

no funding :(

My countdown timer has just started. I am eagerly looking forward to hearing more from this research team and their findings.

pulakit bharti un for to nata... Thats pool game structure

pulakit bharti :) ... So far :') ; n surface tension

Jenish Patel Grammar 10/10.

I had to read the comment 5 times to figure out what you meant...

Sancho Jimenez i've read multiple times and almost replied "i still don't get it" to you

It was a typing mistake guys 😅 Sorry for the confusion. Damn it, 🤗 I trust too much on this Glide typing on Gboard.

Tanya Kopil 100% agree 😊

Yeah that seemed odd, but it might be due to mixing of the available audio sources. Notice how the soundscape shifts after 15:18.

I think the feminists heard that there's gonna be a female scientist talking and they assumed she's gonna talk about how the patriarchy tried to push her down but she fought and won... The jokes went over their heads, there was no cheering for all the achievements she mentioned, because they didn't understand the matter well enough to recognize the significance of her discoveries. Frankly I was surprised they knew to clap when she was done talking

Right? Uptight assholes, she should've been cheered at when revealing the radio galaxies.

because everyones so loud ;)

@@procrasti86 i tried so hard not to lol at this. I failed.

is it really an analogy if its actually the same thing? its like saying lightning is an analogy for electric discharge

Random Schmid it's an analogy. It's absolutely not the same due to light's relativistic nature.

@@MaZe741 it's definitely an analogy, both waves are of different types. Sound wave is longitudinal, light is transversal. Not to mention how fast light wave moves.

Estefany Jimenez agreed 😁

Estefany Jimenez agreed 😁

Random Schmid As far as I've understood it, false colour is just assigning colours to various different elements. What she has done is just compress all the frequencies, from far below to far above the visible spectrum into only the visible spectrum.

I think she just focused on infrared waves. She calls it the radio telescope for a reason (as the radio waves are far below red). Like she showed on the graphic, we only see a fraction of wavelengths. There are certain animals and insects, which can either see or sense a wider range than us, but that's still nothing compared to what we're missing out on. Since we cannot see anything below red, we can't have a color assigned to those frequencies. If we did, that would be a completely new color. One we have never seen before. The way I think it works (vastly simplified though)... To generate the image, as the telescope detects spikes (which are nothing but numbers at this point), the cpu puts them on a black canvas as a white dot. The more dots in an area, the brighter it gets. But there's a value to each dot, as they all started off as a precisely measured number. So if you take your time to analyze the overall range of all the readings you get from your telescope and calibrate it to the threshold most relevant to you - what you end up with are values you can sort out from lowest to highest. Now knowing that red tends to be the lowest wavelength we can see, and blue is the highest... It makes sense to tell the computer to assign the values it got from the telescope to the rainbow of colors you're used to in a way Natasha did. The outcome helps us visualize what's going on and, who knows, maybe even represents some features the way they actually look. Signal coming to us from soooo far far away converted into readable data and then reconstructed into an image. If that doesn't blow your mind, not many things will.

In the Cygnus galaxy??

That's a good point. But isn't it the most likely option that they still are moving away? I'd like to see the break pads that could put a stop to it!

sure. but that's a projection of cosmic time, not an observation. I'm thinking this project of hers should be well funded. If she can get the resolution up like she claims near the end of her talk, we'll know a lot more about... everything (literally) :)