He literally mentioned 1% of Islam. Skipped so many important and critical parts.

He didnt mention anything about central asia, Indonesia, South asia

@@TrickXxl Crazy cuz South Asia is a really important part.

Very well presented my a$$

@blindinglights6960 those are in books, it would be great if someone made a series of videos of Islams history

U can't be serious, he purposely made this video as if islam was Arab alone, when in fact he left out Africa, Asia and many more

@@the_batmobile0.4 that is true 100% and I know that he left out a lot of important historical parts of other countries but still all his facts are correct, the editing is amazing and he phrased everything well so why can't I like it ? he may purposely left out other countries as you said before but there's no need to make a fuss about it since he may have done a video on those equally important countries, other than that I appreciate that you pointed it out :)

shutup rendi @LatestPorkphet

​@LatestPorkphetWe dont need to learn history from Indian pajjeet

@LatestPorkphet🤣🤣🤣🤣

no thanks

Another person said...shut yo butt up

Ewww no thanks

why in islam we dont keep family pictures ?

1000 year history of knowledge and wisdom, and this is what muslims have been reduced to: collecting scraps of deeds online...

Arap değiliz!!

Why?

@@ctsd623 Compare the spread of Islam to the spread of Christianity. Islam is a military/political campaign pretending to be a religious crusade. Whereever Islam lands they talk about peace until their numbers are great enough and then they talk about Sharia law and kick out all non-Muslims. This happened most recently in Sudan/South Sudan. Islam is a political crusade- nothing more. This video does not go into the Arab/Muslim Slave Trade.

I bet you havent read the whole quran in a language you understand

​@@White90ice We read and understand nor only Quran but the science pf hadith from the age of 7 or less.What the hellll are you talking about.Don't think muslims are like christians who don't even know how manu chapters are there in bible.And bible doesn't even exist in its original language and form.

But fighting amongst muslims will last forever

​@@rajatbhaskar6995there is less fighting in islam than there is between the castes of hinduism

@@xyzr_3808 fitna,Shia sunnin

He never said this stop lying

except muslim people killing others in the name of islam. started 1400 years ago and is still done by isis

he mentioned in the video that he is focusing on the core area of Islam which is the middle east and surrounding area.

True, theres a lot more muslim empire including in Africa, Russia, China and South East Asia.. in history they always show the one that are in the middle east

fun fat african muslims empire are so strong like mamelouk mali songhai almohades almoravides saadien and a lot even in asia like india or china and a lot of mangols became muslims @@adydee2982

The caricature this person made about our prophet is offensive

caricature is haram for all prophetes @@mohammudyousuf622

There are biases, though subtle. For example, to say Mohammmed pbuh "waged wars against the polytheists" is misleading. Initial wars were defensive (Battle of Badr, Battle of Uhud, Battle of the Trench, etc.), and wars waged later on were to get ahead of other tribes who were likely to wage war on the muslims displayed in their actions. Some tribes were flat out caught being treacherous and breaking agreements (even in the middle of battle sometimes), which would not go unchecked in any former or modern society.

@@eesa First it is necessary for you to learn what being biased means, because you clearly do not understand the concept. You are telling me the Muslim version of the conflict with the polytheists of Arabia, we have no other source to confirm whether everything you say is correct or not. To think that you can accuse others of being ''biased'' by using a ONE-SIDED source is truly paradoxical.

​@@apocalypticskepticus3299Read about Muhammad pbuh yourself and you'll see what @eesa is trying to say

​@@apocalypticskepticus3299I won't say its bias, I will say its over simplified to the core. It makes it sound as if Muhammad was a strong man bullying Arabia and we know it was quite the opposite. He and his state were always in the brink of extermination until the last few years of his life and even then, a new threat, the byzantine and Persians.

​@@apocalypticskepticus3299@eesa is to some extent right. Although I don't believe the video is bias, I believe its over simplified, but that was the point of the video 😅 to summarise it. But what we do know is Muhammad wasn't going around waging war on people, that would have been a terrible mistake infact, the whole of Arabia was pretty much against him, would be not wise to make new enemies, he was always in a defensive posture, but his defiant attitude caused him to triumph. Read about him, very interesting man. His religion is a great one as well. Very interesting religion which intrests me alot. I'll suggest you read about the man and his legacy. Peace be upon him.

Because he only posted 3 vids and only this vid has more than 100k views

Islamic rule in India was a form of colonialism, characterized by the imposition of a foreign islamic culture, religion, and political system on the Indian subcontinent. Muslims were foreign invaders who came to India and imposed their Islamic faith and culture on the indigenous population. They point to examples of the destruction of Hindu temples, the imposition of Jizya tax on non-Muslims, and the forced conversions to Islam as evidence of this colonialist mindset. Muslim social attitudes on modern issues have caused controversy everywhere. Islam to be incompatible with secular society, and that, unlike other religions, Islam positively commands its adherents to impose its religious law on all peoples, believers and unbelievers alike, whenever possible and by any means necessary. Islam allows to propagate abuses, such as the mistreatment of women and homosexuals, and slavery. They also state that multiculturalism allows a degree of religious freedom that exceeds what is needed for personal religious freedom and is conducive to the creation of organizations aimed at undermining secular values. According to poll, high people had an unfavourable view of Islam, higher than for any other religion.

The developed world is a dying world based on its fertility rates meaning its standards cannot fulfill a fundemental need for a self sustaining society so how could the secular society be a proper reference to judge the muslim society? Also if you were even listening to the video's content you should have realised that Islam does not imply spreading it by any means.

​@@snehashispanda4808😂😂😂😂😂😂 what You Will Do Cry

@@snehashispanda4808 agreed

@@snehashispanda4808 Im not gonna answer what you've said yet, cuz who made those facts, but answer this, What do u think the europeans did?

True. It was a horribly cruel and bloody period.

@@rickhastings6063 compared to their non muslim counterpart, they are saint.

​@@iqnisrosevelt4706if you read the self accounts and court records of islamic rulers of India, you will know how inhumane they were. While non islamic rulers wanted to nurture the good will of the people they ruled over, islamic rulers competed to ensure who killed, enslaved and forcibly converted more hindus than the previous ruler. Islam is the plague of the earth....

what happen ?

​@@iqnisrosevelt4706 even in bloodshed, muslim vs non-muslim ..as usual

Do you belive that Mohamed was massenger from god

Messenger of baal

@@ricardo-2022 Yes, Do you believe Jesus said he was God?

@simonlester83 😁 womp womp

@ahiduzzamanahir1338 jesus Nevers said Worship Me

yea

I thought they copied the video.. 😅

It's Israeli channel 🥴

@@heshamsultan511 Da hell really??

@@farahahmed8201 ادخلي على لمحة كدا وشوفي اللوكيشن

Όλα αυτά προήλθαν από τους Αρχαίους Έλληνες και την Ελλάδα γενικότερα. Ξεχνάς πολλά ή δε σας τα μαθαίνουν σωστά στο σχολείο μου φαίνεται.

​@@AngryMetalheadOfficial Claiming that everything invented in 16 centuries of history is stolen from Greeks is straight out delusional. Are you okay?

​@@AngryMetalheadOfficial each contributed in a different way, many discoveries were influenced by the other side while many were not. All empires contributed to knowledge and science in a certain form. Both of you are wrong for claiming everything came from one side. Remove the hatred and think objectively.

​@@AngryMetalheadOfficialGreek were taught by kemet before they were conquered by babylonians

​@@perishedfirestorm555And did Muslim invented

The rise and fall in Spain is a huge history lesson on its own. The Reconquista. It starts as a few Christian groups survive in the far northern mountains; all of lower Spain conquered by... I forgot which Islamic group by I think it became Al-Andulus. In the north, even the Christians were divided, and so for a hundred years nothing much changes. However, the Islamic part of the Iberian Peninsula slowly had their own internal dramas, and eventually a Christian king came to hold much of northern Spain through conquest. When he died he had 3 sons and his kingdom was split in 3, that of Galicia, Leon and Castille. This is why many modern Spanish people call themselves Castillian, and it's why they're proud of Castillian history. The Christian kingdoms had alliances, eventually even with that Portucale fella who became the king of Portugal, and Castille ended up united with a few different kingdoms as Spain (the modern name). The Muslim part of Iberia had become weaker and weaker, and so after about 700 years of war, the entire peninsula was once again under Christian rule. So, in the East, the Byzantines eventually fell and became Turkey, while in the West, the Iberian Muslims eventually fell and became Spain. The religions of Christianity and Islam have had war for many centuries because they border one another. A fun note, the famous Iconoclast movement in the Byzantine empire was started from Muslim influence. These two sister religions are intimately tied in fate and history, although often through war, death and violence.

Very well explained:)​@@Alex-zw7sr

few

The caricature this person made about our prophet is offensive

@@mohammudyousuf622 where? I didnt see it!

@@muslimresponse103he is a bot and probably a fake one don’t react

True

The caricature this person made about our prophet is offensive

​@@mohammudyousuf622that's the thing when people rely too much on Orientalists' view of Islam

He was interim (placeholder for Ali's position), until Mu'awiya became the Caliph.

@@1nv1nc3ble He is within the 30 years the prophet foretold. He also fulfills a second prophecy in his abdication. He also had the full support of the muslim base. He is the legitimate fifth caliph.

Thank you. The track is called Conquest - The Mongol Empire, by Keith O' Sullivan.

@@How-So you are most welcome. And thank you for the track’s name.

@@How-SoBrother We as Sunnis accepted Ali as our fourth caliph but the Shias didn’t accepted the thee first caliphs as legitimate rulers and they see Ali as holy but we see only the Prophets as holy.

Kral yine sahada tarihini savunuyor

Turks here looked similar to mongols and persians not modern turkish Republic turks

@@Goyim-phobicthese “Turks” are actually Greeks and Armenians who forgot their language and religion after getting their ass whooped by the real Turks

Al andlus is 100% arab with little berber , nothing tur*kc about it

The American missionary Eli Smith and G. H. O. Dwight, who traveled through turkey at the beginning of the nineteenth century observed that the turkomans were generally called Turks by the Ottomans, who abhorred the name Turk and proffered to be called Musalmans (Muslims). To the Ottomans, “turk” was a name that belonged to the people of Turkestan and the nomadic hordes who roamed the steppes of khurrusan. They considered themselves civilized Ottomans, and could not understand why Europeans called them Turks. As a sophisticated ruling class, the Ottomans looked down upon the Turkish peasantry, calling them esek Turk (Donkey Turk), and kaba turk (stupid turk). Expressions like “turk-head” and “turk-person” were contemptuously used by ottomans when they wanted to denigrate each other.”

Watch a Christian video

Ottomans were called the "sick man of Europe" much later, in the 19th century. They remained a powerhouse until their losses against the Russians in the Russo-Turkish War of 1768-1774. During the 19th century, amidst internal instability, external pressures, and territorial losses, this term gained prominence, reflecting their weakened state compared to the European powers.

Mughal empire we're seen as a powerful rich empire than whole Europe entirely up until 18th century as the Europeans were considered small fish at the time

Was part of the motivation behind European exploration, as trade routes, taxation, and travel were fully controlled by these empires

Never forget the attrocities comitted by the ottomans to their own christian population, namely genocide, which is still denied by Turkey to this day

@@revelacol2149 also never forget European territories were under Ottoman rule without any forced conversations unlike Safavid persia