If your 🇺🇲 start nagging many respects from 🇬🇧

USA has more than 100 B61 bombs that have been in Europe for decades, now is best time to fit them onto F-16s and as Joe Binden said about his 1999 Serbia bombing campaign, "Bomb them into peace"

The US military saves everything. They'll are still capable munitions even after the PrSM comes online. My guess is they' go to Taiwan when the PrSM stocks get to a military capable level.

@@HKim0072You mean US will send ATCMS to Taiwan? that makes no sence. Taiwan's main threat is Chinesse Navy and Air forces. ATACMS won't help them to fight those parts of armed forces.

@@andreypersikov6214 In October 2020, the U.S. State Department approved the sale of 64 M57 ATACMS to Taiwan.

Exactly! God bless you! May God bless Ukraine with a just victory!

Let's not turn Ukraine into a hellscape and institute healthcare for all here in the US.

@@markharmon4963 Speak to Mitch, Jim, Boebert, MJT, Cruz and the other trump Crew.

@@markharmon4963Republicans would never approve that and they have the majority in the House of representatives they voted against bills like this several times in the last decade

@Syae55 And at the same time, Ukraine has constitutional ongoing medical care provided free for all. Examples; free insulin, free x-rays and treatment for broken limbs, free antibiotics for strep throat.

@@markharmon4963 Yes Ukraine has much better policies sadly until Republicans stop blocking healthcare in the US there is nothing common people like you and me can do other than vote these people out.. Republicans want to elect Trump in 2024 again this will be horrible for topics like infrastructure and healthcare we remember how he did nothing last time

Yeah great we’ll all just suffer here and sort everyone else out 🤡

@@amacca2085Who is suffering here? giving old weapons from our warehouses causes no negative effects for British people also creating more jobs and bringing manufacturers back Russia is helping the UK economy

Pleasure :)

Isn't the French who gave them the missils ?

@@JimCarner But unfortunately the Ground Launched Small Diameter Bombs do not have the range of the Storm Shadows.

@@JimCarner But even so, GLSDBs do not pack the punch of a 450 kg of explosive power of a Storm Shadow. Ukraine needs the ATACMS and needed them in the fall of 2021, not the fall of 2023.

@@JimCarner I am a principled liberal/libertarian. I was a whistleblower as a professional civil engineer in government service, trying to stop the waste, fraud, and abuse of $500 million dollars in Federal Highway Administration funding. I know just how corrupt our government is in America. Sorry for the pivot but to be honest, we would not be having this conversation in the first place had President-elect Trump been rightfully reinstated as our President. No new wars. The Military Industrial Complex and others had Joe BRIBEn installed. BRIBEn enabled, empowered, and encouraged Putrid to invade Ukraine. BRIBEn wants to prolong this war by refusing to give Ukraine the ATACMS and jets in order to enable our MIC to reap billions in profits. I am ashamed to be an American at this point in time.

Yes the next Wunderwaffe will surely stop the Russians this time.

What benefits when one was recently captured and will be sent to China for reverse engineering and mass production. 😅😂😂😂

@@Dbenzsanz You mean the parts of it that remained about it destroyed its target?

Ukraine does not have supply lines?

@@markharmon4963 Yes, what is your point?

@steeltalon2317 Russia has long-distance missle capability. And it has not meant an end to the war. Ukraine is the most corrupt regime in Europe controlled by Nazi enforcers. NATO would be wise not to entrust long-distance capability to them. It could be used on anyone they chose. Also, accountability for weapons custody is very low in Ukraine.

Wall Street Journal is an American news agency. Why wouldn't they use the units their main audience uses?

Gotta love the military industrial complex and the war economy 😄 nothing like dead people and special interests that control the US

Yea you get rich off of war. Yay

Yes but wich BAE systems exactly as I know there is operations and offices in Yeovil and in Portsmouth England as I've visited them as I live in Yeovil in South of the U.K' and judging by that I also assume there are many more around the country for things such train and plane directing and route guiding computer technology.

@@vinaholland-hill6239oh noooo let’s stop funding bae that’s giving weapons to Ukraine to defend themselves because making profit is always wrong and bad oh noooooo 😢

People die while you get rich yay

and you think these long range missiles are the silver bullet that ukraine has been missing?

@@operator9858 No, we need to give Ukraine a lot more. 🤫. And believe me, it's coming 🙏. Continue bleeding the Cranks, sooner than later they're going to realize their mistake of invading Ukraine.

@@agnt.geraldsinclairnsa6230 i guess we'll see after Vilnius, but after the lacking progress in this offensive i think that may not be what they hope for...

bulldozed after it got bombed...does it make sense?!

Ammunition depo - most of the blast comes from the depo inventory blowing up, so it looks like a mini-nuke hit it.

@@heyyo162 That explanation must be giving you a warm and fuzzy feeling.

Risk of escalation, risk that Ukraine will target Russian soil. I don’t think the US wants the war to end anytime soon if just wants to grind Russia down and bleed it dry

how much more of this stuff you think we have left man? and whats really the goal here?

@@operator9858 The goal is for Ukraine to defeat Putin now so that the US and NATO do not have to in the future. Lots of bang for the buck here.

@@notinmyUSMC okay...well thats obviously an abysmal failure, so can we pull the plug and go home and come up with a new plan yet?

​@@operator9858Give them everything now to finish the job NOW. If Trump comes back in office, he already said he will not supply further military aid to Ukraine and would push for a settlement. That's appeasement to an aggressor.

​@@operator9858You got it wrong. Russia has been the "absmal failure" not Ukraine. Do you even remember the "three day special operation"? Remember Afghanistan where their soldiers threw down their weapons and uniforms and fled without a fight. That is an absmal failure twenty years in the making. Instead of capitulating, the Ukrainians are fighting back to protect their homeland and freedom.

You are the voice of cowardice and sloth.

@@JimCarner Of course they are. The budget is a finite resource. A zero sum game.

@@SoCalFreelance what he means is probably that research in weapons technology benefit civilian technology also. Nuclear tech, GPS, microwave owens, computer networks all originate from the military.

Indeed, I sometimes think about that too. World military expenditure reached $2240 billion last year. 2,24 trillion dollars, while 682 million people (8.5% of the world population) live in extreme poverty.

Наконец то адекватный комментарий

EXACTLY So!!!!

It was developed by France and England jointly

They gonna fit it with a 50cc engine?😂

Storm Shadow missiles were state of the art.... 20 years ago.... There is a much more advanced replacement being developed that will enter service within a few years.

Bridges are strong and missiles weak. They can't carry much of a warhead because they need space for fuel. Missiles are good for destroying machinery, not reinforced concrete designed to carry hundreds of tons and survive severe storms and earthquakes.

How can they all be downed when according to Putins spineless little minions Ukraine sold them all?

Ukraine is mostly receiving old stuff not the latest and greatest

Technically it's not a counter offensive, because there wasn't any offensive from the russian side during the winter. What else do you expect? Moscow in three days :D ?

No.

@@steveprocter6241 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/esiXZdmL2pi6caM.html

Storm Shadows are out of production, Britain and France aren't going to benefit economically from showcasing missiles they aren't making any more.

Biden will soon approve it.

France also approved to supply their SCALP-EG

Rest of NATO in Ukraine will change this war a lot. News will not be talking about villages taken, Bigger things will happen very fast.

@@warthundershowcasing8905 Agreed. As a Brit, I'm pleased that our friends in France are also supplying them.

Don't they let you use Deepstate map? It’s a discreet week or so behind, these days, but still useful.

@@eh1702 no russia government has banned the use of those war maps, any information that contradicts russian's state media will land you in a labor "reeducation" camp.

Get to the front and show us what you can do, tough guy. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

They’re long overdue

and what? that will change something? please send them so we can destroy more american equipment

We should have never listened to Putler's threats.

F-35 can't even hide from S-300 missile defense system

@@reis1185 F16 can too

@@passurlamer When are you going to the trenches you little warmongering dolt? This is not COD.

It’s only the export version, many countries have these missiles in Europe and Middle East

@@HaiLsKuNkY And they don't even have two... they have one, made in France and the shrapnel of a British one that hit it's target. And correct, as per the Geneva Convention on the exportation of advanced arms and as stated before they were exported, their advanced targeting package was removed, their range reduced to 1/4 and it's speed and payload limited... there is literately nothing secret in them lol and yet out of the 10 fired at the Russian Ammo dump and Railway line coming out of Crimea at the same time the French one was shot down... 9 hit their target and completely destroyed the station, railway line and main ammo dump (As seen by satellite by the entire world)... the fact that Russia only shot one down just shows how weak Russia is compared to NATO. Especially since the unrestricted versions in NATO are also in the progress of being replaced with much better missile lol. Besides, as a Brit, i would gladly hear they were all shutdown if it meant Russia is losing... which they are, Pushed from Kiev to the Black sea coast... Even Russia's military partners are withdrawing their support as they don't want to be connected to a losing country. As shown by China still selling cheap drones to Ukraine and then those drone knocking out thousands of infantry and armour... as shown in all media world wide.

@@JimCarner Sorry, JDAMS. We haven't sent the MOAB yet.

@@JimCarner The US is out of 155 rounds. We are out of Stingers. We are low on Javelins. We are out of Patriots. Soon we will be out of F-16s. I think it would make sense to pull a Joe in Afghanistan and simply walk away from Ukraine.

@@JimCarner Absolutely. We never should have picked a proxy fight with Russia in the first place. The way it stand right now, China is simply Biden their time, waiting for America to expend more munitions and weapons in Ukraine. We we get bogged down or we lose interest they will take Taiwan. Now I personally think they will also use that time to take Guam away from the US as well. To be quite frank, short of nuclear weapons, with everything we have already lost in Ukraine, I don't think we have the ability to stop China from taking Taiwan, Guam, or frankly Hawaii.

@@joshuaalistair3193On the one hand being against involvement in Ukraine because it’s a „proxy war“ but then turning around and wanting to create a proxy war with China the biggest ally of Russia by arming Taiwan and other Asian nations.. This basically just screams that you hate Chinese but like Russians it’s really that simple and also very dumb arguing like this based on who i dislike more lol

That would actually be the second almost intact Storm Shadow missile that the Russians have gotten their hands on. The first was two weeks ago. A French manufactured Storm Shadow. The Russians are getting very good at dealing with NATO weapons. The F16s won't make much difference either. If they are shooting down cruise missiles, I think the F16 will be a very easy target.

Haha another game changer guy luck hahaa

The same would happen to Taiwanese they can’t get any missiles through because they would always pay the price and only small numbers get through because China has air superiority

Putler ist kaput. 😂

@@supersaiyan8857 Meanwhile it took Ukranians 60 000 killed soldiers and half of their army engaged to try to keep “non-strategic” and “non important” city for some reason . And they were defeated and retreated anyway.

The better question is why isn't Russia itself using the same time period to bolster its side to once again mount an invasion of Kyiv to finish the "special operation" 🤔 After all, it can't be enough to merely entrench yourself in the Donbas awaiting Ukraine's counter attack when the existential threat is with all those Nazis running around in Kyiv. 😂😂😂

@@wren2900 You can thank Wagner for Bakhmut but they are now officially a NPC on the sidelines though. Meanwhile, Putler must commit whatever is left of his best troops to Bakhmut, locking them in place unable to be deployed elsewhere. So advantage Ukraine. 60,000 Ukrainians died defending a single city??????????? You got a source for that or did the cartoon knight in your icon tell you that? 🤦

@@supersaiyan8857 and 25% of whole ukraine, dont forget that

@@passurlamer Much better than the "counter offensive."

That’s ok the UK doesn’t use Storm Shadow anymore. Hence why it’s deemed okay to use in Ukraine

American bot here supporting the Ukrainian bots. Beep boop

@@matt45540 boop

you hadnt heard? the sunni's and shiites have made peace and have belt and road and brics to hold it together (and global south is following suit). they have defeated us with the pen, not the sword.

No need to do that. Russia is doing a good job of bombing civilians in Syria on its own.

Well they are probing the front lines for weaknesses while only committing 2 battalions. Meanwhile Russia has taken a heavy defensive posture so it’s always going to be slow going. Ukraine isn’t over committing but when it does fully break through, and it will it has dozens of well trained battalions left to get the job done. It will likely take years of relative stalemate though. This isn’t a video game. Ukraine needs longer range weapons as Russia has fallen back so far

@@k-ron7403 cope

How about we come after you after russia is deleted?

@@Diggnuts how about we delete you?

@@sergeipetrov_rzn It would be entertaining to see you try!

So... Russia must continue fighting Ukraine because the west keeps providing Ukraine weapons in response to Russia's invasion of Ukraine? What?

@@Diggnuts we want to be left alone, but since you come to delete us, you know, we need to respond

if you call detonating the missiles onto russian soldiers 'giving', then yes I guess they are gifting then in a sense lol

@@stonem0013 And more gifting to come.

Russia lies about everything all the time. I wouldn't worry

There is always that risk, Ukrainians captured new variant of Kh-101 cruise missile too, that crashed, but remained relatively intact.

@@Hez_Goldberger It's funny that Russia has to reverse engineer American technology. I guess Russia just isn't as advanced or as capable!

@@Hez_Goldberger and they’ll get the components how? Cannibalise stolen washing machines? They can’t even get the electronic components for 1980s tanks! Besides, Trump probably already sold them some blueprints.

@@chaosXP3RT russia is still 50 years behind in everything except their hypersonic missile program, that's all they have going for them.

Go back to ruzzia. Then the war will be over. It really is that simple.

Ukraine cannot defeat Russia, this is true. But they don't have to defeat Russia in a conventional sense. They don't have to take Moscow. Russia's stated objective is the demilitarization and 'de-Nazification' of Ukraine. This requires a total victory to accomplish. Ukraine's stated objective is to preserve its sovereignty and reclaim occupied territories. This requires only that they push the war into a stalemate. To achieve victory, Russia must conquer the entirety of Ukraine. Meanwhile Ukraine must only survive to achieve victory. In a war like this, the bigger army isn't always assured victory. One need only look at the Revolutionary War, the Vietnam War, both the USA and USSR's invasions of Afghanistan, and Russia's first invasion of Chechnya.

Ruzzians lie always...

Explain?