How the US Navy's new C-130s could end the world

  Рет қаралды 205,537

Sandboxx

Sandboxx

2 ай бұрын

If nuclear war were to break out in the coming years, there's a solid chance the solemn responsibility of relaying the message to launch America's nuclear weapons would come down to a specially equipped fleet of C-130 Hercules cargo aircraft.
Let's talk about the unique TACAMO mission, and why aircraft are an essential part of maintaining communications with America's submerged ballistic missile submarines.
📱 Follow Sandboxx News on social
Twitter: / sandboxxnews
Instagram: / sandboxxnews
Facebook: / sandboxxnews
TikTok: / sandboxxnews
📱 Follow Alex Hollings on social
Twitter: / alexhollings52
Instagram: / alexhollings52
Facebook: / alexhollings. .
TikTok: www.tiktok.com/alexhollings52
Citations:
www.airpac.navy.mil/Organizat...
www.airpac.navy.mil/Organizat...
breakingdefense.com/2023/04/n...
www.travis.af.mil/News/Displa...
aviationweek.com/defense-spac...
www.defensenews.com/digital-s...

Пікірлер: 794
@bennychesney7185
@bennychesney7185 Ай бұрын
That last line "the B52 might outlive us all, but it just might be the C130 that ushers in our demise" was a haunting piece of poetry
@vic5015
@vic5015 Ай бұрын
Only until tye Air Force finally runs out of spare parts. I've heard they're having to steal parts from B52s in museums.
@vic5015
@vic5015 Ай бұрын
Only if the Air Force doesn't run put of spare parts. I've hesrd theyre having to get them from museum exhibits.
@swell07_
@swell07_ Ай бұрын
youve got some sort of weird fetish if you think thi youtube is publishing poetry
@bennychesney7185
@bennychesney7185 Ай бұрын
@@vic5015 that problem is effecting all aircraft right now. The civilian market isn't much better, a lot of planes are sitting and waiting for parts to be manufactured
@vic5015
@vic5015 Ай бұрын
​​​@bennychesney7185 its especially bad with the B52. The production lines fior spare parts, pretty obviously, closed down *decades* ago. No doubt the USAF faces similar challenges with its many Boeing 707-based airframes. Somewhere, probably at places like the National Museum of the Air Force at Wright-Pattersin AFB, there are a *whole* bunch of B52s on display that are discreetly missing a whole slew of vital spare parts.
@acarrillo8277
@acarrillo8277 Ай бұрын
The C-130 will be flying in some form or another for another 70 years.
@davefellhoelter1343
@davefellhoelter1343 Ай бұрын
A Great Truck is always a GREAT TRUCK! age just makes it better.
@mistypig
@mistypig Ай бұрын
I have to remark at that UN SPACY pfp
@rustymustard7798
@rustymustard7798 Ай бұрын
There will be a variant of the C-130 doing airdrops on Mars by then lol.
@TheOriginalFaxon
@TheOriginalFaxon Ай бұрын
Considering it's the largest transport plane that can take off and land on our carriers unassisted, I think the Navy is going to want the government to keep them around in some form just as transport aircraft until then at least. Unless they come up with an easier and faster way of moving massive amounts of cargo to carriers in an emergency, it's absolutely worth it. Yea the platform is old as fuck but I legitimately think we should keep making them unless someone can come up with a similar sized replacement that does something significantly better without sacrificing on any of the other stuff the C-130 excels at.
@Tenchigumi
@Tenchigumi Ай бұрын
Ditto. ​@@mistypig
@scottcooper4391
@scottcooper4391 Ай бұрын
The C130 is a fine example (along with the B-52) of a well designed aircraft able to perform long after the original designers are dead and buried. This doesn't mean the changes haven't been made - of course they have - but the basic airframe design has been proven over years of exactly just how good it is.
@WhydoIsuddenlyhaveahandle
@WhydoIsuddenlyhaveahandle Ай бұрын
Don't forget the KC-135!
@a4ordy877
@a4ordy877 Ай бұрын
Did Kelly Johnson design the c-130??
@seanoneill9130
@seanoneill9130 Ай бұрын
C-130s require more than 20 maintenance manhours per flight hour. Junk.
@Yosh1az
@Yosh1az Ай бұрын
​@@seanoneill9130 the newer variant C-130j only needs 10
@alexv3357
@alexv3357 Ай бұрын
There's really never not going to be a good use for big, tough truck of a plane like that
@billwill7383
@billwill7383 Ай бұрын
Did that Hercules just do a loop?👀
@scabthecat
@scabthecat Ай бұрын
Wait, what? I never knew they could do that. Or any plane that big for that matter.
@whateves5369
@whateves5369 Ай бұрын
The Blue Angel's Hurc usually does it at their air shows. Also doing the rocket assisted short take offs
@neuropilot7310
@neuropilot7310 Ай бұрын
​@@scabthecatThat may have been a L-100J (Civilian C-130J) shown at an airshow a few years ago. They did loops and rolls not previously seen from a C-130/C-130J
@thedeadmoneyallstars
@thedeadmoneyallstars Ай бұрын
Yup, first cargo aircraft that can do barrel rolls 😁
@Kpar512
@Kpar512 Ай бұрын
@@whateves5369 I've seen the Blue Angels a number of times, but never saw "Fat Albert" do a loop!
@sparrowhawk3894
@sparrowhawk3894 Ай бұрын
It's pronounced; (TAC - A - MO) or TACAMO. An EC-130 can be forward deployed anywhere around the world and like you said can land almost anywhere. Only the 1961 (proof of concept) version was a roll-on-roll-off system after those initial test the EC-130 G and Q models were permanent instillations. At that time there was a TACAMO aircraft aloft over the Atlantic and Pacific oceans 24-7-365 basis. I supervised the communications portion of the missions from 1972-1976 as an Aircrew member of VQ-4 (Crew 7) NAS Patuxent River Maryland .Those were days to remember.
@cowtipper8951
@cowtipper8951 Ай бұрын
Toyota Tacamo
@theldun1
@theldun1 Ай бұрын
START is pointless when only one side sticks to it.
@user-ij6mf2hp3r
@user-ij6mf2hp3r Ай бұрын
Yep. No argument about that! It's like going to e.v. If everyone doesn't do it, it's not going to work.
@MRsolidcolor
@MRsolidcolor Ай бұрын
thats the problem with american leadership.. they want this. they dont want us getting beast mode again... they want us weak
@MrTzeNoh
@MrTzeNoh Ай бұрын
Just remeber: the othet side wasnt able to build cars with seatbelts. Just sit it out, their arms will decay all by themselves.
@JWQweqOPDH
@JWQweqOPDH Ай бұрын
​​@@user-ij6mf2hp3rE.V.s are a bit different because even if everyone was in agreement it'd be very challenging to implement. We don't have enough of certain elements like Lithium and Cobalt in order to replace every vehicle on Earth with an E.V. The power grid would need an enormous amount of work done to it, including charging stations, transmission lines, and energy storage. If you want to drop fossil fuels in electricity production then you'd spend more on grid storage than on E.V.s themselves.
@user-ij6mf2hp3r
@user-ij6mf2hp3r Ай бұрын
I agree with you completely. Also, I've been told about the amount of Petro. it takes to build the batteries is a big issue. My background is industrial maintenance in chemical plant maintenance. One project was styrene monomer for plastic cups, plates and many other uses. Barge loads came weekly. Also, heat was producing heat. It's a bunch of bs and as you said,we don't have the capability for that. Thanks for your kind input. God bless us all. Greg
@55Reever
@55Reever Ай бұрын
I got to tour an E-6B at Travis AFB. Yes that antenna spool is in the back section. I had no clue what it was and one of the crew members told me, "That's in case we want to go fishing".
@jimfrazier8611
@jimfrazier8611 Ай бұрын
I did 14 strategic detergent patrols onboard three Ohio-class subs. Tacamo aircraft sucked balls, because they only flew on Sunday night, and Sunday was our day to catch up on sleep. if you ever wonder why anyone would turn down $100K for a two-year re-enlistment, just spend one day aboard a missile sub on strategic alert.
@wolfhunter98
@wolfhunter98 Ай бұрын
The fact the government is giving a "grunt" more than his whole yearly paycheck as a bonus to keep doing his job should tell you well enough. Not Navy myself, mind if I ask why you guys would never just rotate the "sleep day" to offset that?
@jimfrazier8611
@jimfrazier8611 Ай бұрын
@@wolfhunter98 Apparently the upper brass feels like they can't give us a decent night of sleep, without us turning into the Air Force or something.
@420MrReefer
@420MrReefer 25 күн бұрын
Bet you cleaned up on those missions ; )
@jimfrazier8611
@jimfrazier8611 25 күн бұрын
@@420MrReefer It's called a Strategic Detergent Patrol for a reason. Mostly because the atmosphere aboard a nuclear submarine is about 17% Oxygen, and 83% lube oil vapor. We probably wiped up 100 gallons of yellow oil each patrol.
@proy3
@proy3 Ай бұрын
I served at TACAMO and I can't help but wonder how the pilots and aircrew feel about going from a 707 to a C-130.
@jordibt1789
@jordibt1789 Ай бұрын
I'm sure they'll throy a temper tantrum, but they should be grateful that they're staying with 4 engines, not something the Poseidons can claim. I'm sure it won't make them feel better but at least they got a replacement, Spain replaced their SIGINT/ELINT 707 "the queen of the spectrum" (and 2 c212) with literally nothing.
@mendodsoregonbackroads6632
@mendodsoregonbackroads6632 Ай бұрын
They’re going to like it. Nice new C130J right off the assembly line. I didn’t hear anyone complaining about going from C-9 to C130T back in the day either.
@MaggieKeizai
@MaggieKeizai Ай бұрын
How were the shitters on the E6? Because on the Hercules, it's a half step up from a sloppy bucket and you are FORBIDDEN from pooping in it under penalty of death. There's a janky curtain for modesty, that's it. Apart from that, great planes.
@robertworley9620
@robertworley9620 Ай бұрын
In the '70s the TACAMO birds were EC-130Q. Those airframes were sold & converted to airborne firefighters.
@lafeeshmeister
@lafeeshmeister Ай бұрын
@@MaggieKeizai Yeah, I was gonna say: fix the shitter, put a 20mm on the back, and you have a dream aircraft. Kidding about the 20mm.
@michaelmorgan3642
@michaelmorgan3642 Ай бұрын
Alex, it's pronounced TAC-A-MO! Glad to see you cover this mission.
@matthewdavies2057
@matthewdavies2057 Ай бұрын
Beat me to it.
@colinkelly990
@colinkelly990 Ай бұрын
Me too
@Kook-a-mal
@Kook-a-mal Ай бұрын
Me too!
@davestarr7112
@davestarr7112 Ай бұрын
Me 4. I worked the ground-based VLF radios for the USA for some years. Fascinating system, thanks for this post.
@HolySoliDeoGloria
@HolySoliDeoGloria Ай бұрын
\TACK-uh-moe\, not \ta-KAH-moe\
@WasabiSniffer
@WasabiSniffer Ай бұрын
The utility of the c130 never stops impressing, even more so its potential
@exodus1383
@exodus1383 Ай бұрын
I had no idea the TACAMO system existed before this
@wolfhunter98
@wolfhunter98 Ай бұрын
Same, but also had no idea how the subs got the EMS messages. Neat to know, and the land based ones.
@davedice4688
@davedice4688 Ай бұрын
Great vid. Just have someone pronounce TACAMO for you.
@nelson8527
@nelson8527 Ай бұрын
C-130 is a one of a kind. You know something different is flying when it goes over head. Got to stay on Maxwell for a couple years, found myself down at the grocery store watching them land and takeoff, got to see a bunch of different aircraft there but the c-130’s definitely my favorite.
@user-ij6mf2hp3r
@user-ij6mf2hp3r Ай бұрын
Maxwell! I've been there and saw the Thunder Birds in F-16s. I will be there in April. Good air show. Everyone, I'm sorry for starting in on the E.V. discussion. My bad. This is probably not what Alex wants. But I do like everyone thinking about it. I don't know the answer. I'm just saying.
@nelson8527
@nelson8527 Ай бұрын
@@user-ij6mf2hp3r yea I got to see the thunderbirds down there when i was on base. Awesome place, miss it honestly.
@user-ij6mf2hp3r
@user-ij6mf2hp3r Ай бұрын
@@nelson8527 I live about 250 miles away from there. My uncle was a Crew Chief on F-102 and 106 then went to work for Delta in B-Ham. That's what hooked me on aviation. Great talking with you. Call anytime.
@MrDubyadee1
@MrDubyadee1 Ай бұрын
I’d love a show that talked about all the current and future roles for the C-130. It’s a dragon ship, an ammunition hauler for the Navy, a cargo aircraft for delivering troops and supplies in rough areas, and it can drop/launch hundreds of cruise missiles/drones, etc. Talk about versatility.
@jigsaw6246
@jigsaw6246 Ай бұрын
Don't forget the WC-130J Hurricane Hunters that fly directly into hurricanes for the Air Force and the NOAA.
@anydamaddress1
@anydamaddress1 Ай бұрын
A very close family member in an engineer for the c-130 "propulsion" and I asked when they will be retiring that airframe. The reply was "They are flying it until it falls out of the sky" LOL
@kavemanthewoodbutcher
@kavemanthewoodbutcher Ай бұрын
Eventually, they'll retrofit a Hurc for dogfighting.
@sierp13pl
@sierp13pl Ай бұрын
I think it's already happened. I saw some pictures of Hercules with AIM-9 something under it's wings mounted on pylons
@SDJMEfan12
@SDJMEfan12 Ай бұрын
Wouldn’t a 130 gunship with a DEW system on board be exactly that?
@kerbalairforce8802
@kerbalairforce8802 Ай бұрын
The weapon pylons that AC-130s have for small diameter bombs and hellfire missiles could easily carry AIM-9X and fired off bore.
@jakeaurod
@jakeaurod Ай бұрын
Dogfighting might be cool. But how about a _Rapid Dragon_ style of Air Defense by dropping pallets of AAMs or even SAMs? I call it _Rapid Fraggin'_ .
@NoName-ds5uq
@NoName-ds5uq Ай бұрын
I’ve been to one of those communications bases(Exmouth). It was weird using US currency at the bar here in Australia! We had to leave early unfortunately because of the swells at our exposed pier.
@rvrrat1977
@rvrrat1977 Ай бұрын
Best job I ever had was as an IFT on EC-130G/Q in the eighties! Loved it
@texasranger24
@texasranger24 Ай бұрын
A video about the X65 and active flow control would be cool.
@EDCandLace
@EDCandLace Ай бұрын
I 2nd this!
@everypitchcounts4875
@everypitchcounts4875 Ай бұрын
Add XQ-67a to the list
@luckydog9809
@luckydog9809 Ай бұрын
C'mon Alex, "This is...SEAPOWER!"
@TamagoHead
@TamagoHead Ай бұрын
🤣G1!
@thesuit4820
@thesuit4820 Ай бұрын
Worlds second largest air force....
@letsgobrandon416
@letsgobrandon416 Ай бұрын
Seriously man, keep the iconic intro!
@user-ij6mf2hp3r
@user-ij6mf2hp3r Ай бұрын
I love the way you think. Sea power.
@The_ZeroLine
@The_ZeroLine Ай бұрын
You’re ALEX HOLLINGS!
@sjsomething4936
@sjsomething4936 Ай бұрын
Fascinating stuff Alex, I can always count on your channel to bring forth some interesting and informative content!
@DiscoR53
@DiscoR53 Ай бұрын
When I worked at McDonnell Douglas on the C17 program in the electronics department. All C17 have these communications capabilities [very low frequency communication]
@ameserich
@ameserich Ай бұрын
C130 is such a legend
@texasranger24
@texasranger24 Ай бұрын
The US Army just chose General Dynamics and Rheinmetall as finalists for the 4000 Bradley replacement IFVs. Could you do a Firepower series video about this program, the two finalists and the other three that dropped out. Or more generally the current state of IFVs (Bradley, CV90, Puma, Lynx) and their most likely future. Maybe even including anti air IFVs like some CV90 variants and SkyRanger.
@angelarch5352
@angelarch5352 Ай бұрын
yes pls!:)
@3dpyromaniac560
@3dpyromaniac560 Ай бұрын
Surprised Task & Purpose hasn't yet...
@skyhawks4ever
@skyhawks4ever Ай бұрын
Nice video Alex. Brought back memories for me. I had a short tenure as a Tacamo Reel Operator ( VQ-3 NAS Barber’s Pt, HI). I can definitely see how the Herc would be much more cost effective and reliable. I remember on my first flight as a reel operator going up to the cockpit just to stretch my legs and move around. When I get up there, I was surprised to see the flight engineer in the pilot seat, the pilot and copilot were in the galley 😂. Yeah, those continuous orbits were really a drag until you get used to it🥴🤢🤮. VQ-3 was a crazy bunch but I guess that was their way of blowing off steam. The only squadron to be banned from staying at certain hotel chain worldwide 😂. When I got back from those long flights, my wife would ask me why I was walking with a tilt
@thud1241
@thud1241 Ай бұрын
I worked maintenance on the trailing wire antenna system on USAF EC-135s. Yes, five miles of wire but on a normal mission they only used 14,800 feet.
@abrahadabra111
@abrahadabra111 Ай бұрын
Thanks for the updates and the work you put into your videos. Even though I personally don't have a military mindset, it's always fun to watch your videos
@scottlink183
@scottlink183 Ай бұрын
Never even had an idea about this “problem” Thanks for informing me Alex.
@cthulholmhastur5317
@cthulholmhastur5317 Ай бұрын
Good stuff as always, Alex.
@chrislong3938
@chrislong3938 Ай бұрын
This totally took me back to the movie, Crimson Tide! "Scary scenario" is the understatement of all time!
@grondhero
@grondhero Ай бұрын
This video reminds me of English assignments in college, where a question is asked, such as, "How would nuclear submarines get notified to launch their missiles if radio waves don't travel underwater?" And then you answer with "The C-130 will fly over their operating area relaying the message using Ultra Low Frequency" but the professor says, "That's a good answer, but you need to make it 5,000 words and make the C-130 seem like its mission is more dramatic than that."
@adamdamandeman2852
@adamdamandeman2852 Ай бұрын
this was a great video to add to your library. A+ brother
@whyjnot420
@whyjnot420 Ай бұрын
I have always been astonished at how well sound travels underwater. Once a couple of decades back I had a friend bang two rocks together underwater at a moderately busy pond. While I swam away. I got maybe 50-60 feet away and underwater I could still hear them. While above water, I couldn't hear them no matter how hard he hit them. This simple demo really stuck with me. Especially when the subject turns to communication with subs or whatnot underwater.
@Kyzyl_Tuva
@Kyzyl_Tuva Ай бұрын
I believe these are EM waves, not sound waves
@bassmechanic237
@bassmechanic237 Ай бұрын
I always thought ELF was the vibration of the tectonic plates, and i lived on board a boomer for years. I had no idea there was a back up for the ground stations, as there antennas poke straight into the ground quite far. Guess you always need a back up for a back up
@michaelgautreaux3168
@michaelgautreaux3168 Ай бұрын
It's called Sonar. Different frequencies but noise just same. In this case it's 1 way.
@TheOriginalFaxon
@TheOriginalFaxon Ай бұрын
This same effect is why sound can literally kill you underwater if it's loud enough, and it can seriously disable you or cause life-threatening injuries at slightly further away.
@AmericanAdvancement
@AmericanAdvancement Ай бұрын
@@TheOriginalFaxonThat’s why sperm whales are dangerous. When they start clicking at a high pitch (think the pitch they use to hunt giant squid), people become immobilized and can drown if help isn’t provided immediately
@jameswalker7899
@jameswalker7899 Ай бұрын
This is the usual well informed, authoritative report. Warmest compliments. Thank you, sir. :)
@vhostovich
@vhostovich Ай бұрын
You do good work !!!!!
@Mark-079er
@Mark-079er Ай бұрын
always great from SB
@corvanphoenix
@corvanphoenix Ай бұрын
I thought for sure this was going to be about Rapid Dragon! I think the C-130 is the perfect aircraft for this mission. Cheap, reliable, versatile & long endurance.
@jamesbuffington308
@jamesbuffington308 Ай бұрын
In the late80’s during a commo exercise, we could copy Tacamo PAC , Looking Glass, Abncap Eur, Tacamo Lant, all while submerged in south Atlantic close to Africa
@dennisdiede
@dennisdiede Ай бұрын
Alex, I Really enjoy your expertise and insights into America's military machines.
@dickslocum
@dickslocum Ай бұрын
-TACAMO East has been using C-130s for connections with Subs since at least1972. My next door neighbor was Flight Engineer on one back then they kept one on station in the Atlantic 24-7 out of PAX RIVER NAS for the majority of the Cold WAR. And they had VLF Radio transmitter attached to one of the Engines. He said you could read the MORRIS CODE ON THE RPM GAGE Back then the length of the antenna was classified.
@illininighthunter9817
@illininighthunter9817 Ай бұрын
I am not sure where you heard this, but the E-6B is being used in TACAMO with squadrons VQ4 and VQ3. They do not use the C130 since switching over to the E6B, Pax River is a deployment base for those squadrons.
@DeanstuD
@DeanstuD Ай бұрын
As a former Reel Operator, I say that what was classified about the wires 35 years ago still is classified, but it is wild to me how much is open about it nowadays.
@briangriffiths114
@briangriffiths114 Ай бұрын
Very interesting video, learned a lot from it.
@jimmarburger611
@jimmarburger611 Ай бұрын
Alex, I love your videos, you're the best as far as I concerned. I was thinking about VLF transmissions and I was under the impression that the bandwidth was low and of course it's one way to the sub. You didn't mention ELF which is even lower in frequency and bandwidth. There are 2 ground stations in the US and all it's capable of doing is sending a coded letter group that signals the sub to come up to communicate with the Navy's satellite system. I read that VLF only reaches around 20 meters into the water while ELF penetrates to around 150 meters. I'd like to understand this system better.
@summitap1
@summitap1 Ай бұрын
ELF stations shut down 20 years ago. Just VLF now
@MarkGardner66Bonnie
@MarkGardner66Bonnie Ай бұрын
Great stuff as always Alex...in the last few seconds of your video it shows the C-130 landing in the sand and going for reverse on the props to slow down and the sand that it kicks up and is inhaled to the engines is a nightmare for someone like me that maintains them... but very cool
@user-ho1yn6ms7y
@user-ho1yn6ms7y Ай бұрын
@7:43, wow, they really pounded that landing down! Didn’t even attempt a flare!😂
@mylesvmiles7571
@mylesvmiles7571 Ай бұрын
I just know Alex was smiling saying now this is fire 🔥 when he wrote that last "usher our demise" line cause it is
@THE-X-Force
@THE-X-Force Ай бұрын
_"....and the history of these platforms warrants a video of its own..."_ LET'S GO!!! (3:48)
@DeanstuD
@DeanstuD Ай бұрын
Coincidence? 348 is the Buno of the EC-130Q at tinker!
@THE-X-Force
@THE-X-Force Ай бұрын
@@DeanstuDahhah! .. the pieces are falling into place!
@RandomExitsJT
@RandomExitsJT Ай бұрын
Holy crsp! Navy here handled a lot of intel and I did not know that! I can always count on you.
@swlak516
@swlak516 Ай бұрын
Super interesting video. I learned something new today. Also that was an extremely strong title.
@donaldbadowski6048
@donaldbadowski6048 Ай бұрын
VLF is only used to call sub up to a higher depth so that higher frequency radio can transmit data faster. VLF is painfully slow.
@JC-hp7pc
@JC-hp7pc Ай бұрын
C-130 is a swiss army knife. It does cargo transport, it’s a solid jump plane, it does search and rescue, it does surveillance , it’s a flying tank (ac-130), and apparently makes a good comms relay to subs.
@shroom903
@shroom903 Ай бұрын
Not to mention the modified c-130 carrier landing and take off testing in 1963. Not saying that it is being practiced now but with carrier's slightly larger, it could be possible
@darkwinter7395
@darkwinter7395 Ай бұрын
The other way to communicate with a submarine would be acoustically - you'd need a very loud sound source to cover the ocean, but that's not impossible. They'd pick up the signal on their sonar, which they are constantly listening to already.
@AdamosDad
@AdamosDad Ай бұрын
The surface fleet also maintains ELF/VLF capability.
@Hawkeye2001
@Hawkeye2001 Ай бұрын
One additional wrinkle: The C130 can operate off the deck of a carrier.
@sierp13pl
@sierp13pl Ай бұрын
Okay, I want a video only about C-130 covering it's history and achievements
@Rattiar
@Rattiar Ай бұрын
Whew - for a second there, I thought there might not be airpower news, and it would be all about boats, but Alex had us well covered. ;)
@benthere2667
@benthere2667 Ай бұрын
Thats cool stuff. Thanks.
@bennybenitez2461
@bennybenitez2461 Ай бұрын
As a former USN P3 flyer never heard TACAMO “TACK-A-MO” pronounced they way you said it “TE-CA-MO” unique. 👍
@MaggieKeizai
@MaggieKeizai Ай бұрын
"Unique" is sometimes just another way of saying "wrong".
@ddotson45
@ddotson45 Ай бұрын
Maybe a slight editing error right at the end? Either way, great video.
@alexdinero8284
@alexdinero8284 Ай бұрын
liked and subscribed
@shumann1605
@shumann1605 Ай бұрын
Tak u Mo is how you pronounce it bty. Great video Alex.
@FrostYT4444
@FrostYT4444 Ай бұрын
Ac-130: Hellrider on site, just show me where they are
@swell07_
@swell07_ Ай бұрын
no such gunship put down the xbox controller bud
@FrostYT4444
@FrostYT4444 Ай бұрын
@@swell07_ what do you mean? Also I don’t’t play on the xbox. Hell I haven’t even played call of duty before
@SpartanONegative
@SpartanONegative Ай бұрын
One of the best Aircraft ever made The C-130 ⚔️ Just like a Raven 🐦‍⬛ it can do barrel rolls ❤
@napster7825
@napster7825 Ай бұрын
It's amazing how versatile the C-130 is. I don't know the range of one, but I'm sure that with wing tanks, it can reach just about anywhere.
@kerbalairforce8802
@kerbalairforce8802 Ай бұрын
They regularly cross oceans
@texasranger24
@texasranger24 Ай бұрын
Could you do a video about the future of Shorad? Will short range air defense provided by the laser stryker? Will the Bradley replacement IFV XM30 function as an anti air cannon? Should the US look at the SkyRanger / Skynex / millenium gun system? And will there be a Stinger replacement with a better battery, targeting, and most importantly more affordable? Or is this affordable future the APKWS guidance upgrade for the cheap and plentiful Hydra 70mm rocket? Should we slap that on Avenger Hummvees? Or IRIS-T?
@HolySoliDeoGloria
@HolySoliDeoGloria Ай бұрын
I think that the replacement will be a 737 variant, as the E-7 Wedgetail is. There would be some logistical efficiencies because of the E-7s that will replace the E-3 and likely still be based at Tinker AFB, where the E-6s are based. Also, the Navy's P-8 is a 737 airframe. The "dash" capability of a jet is a desired quality for escaping an inbound nuclear attack and for repositioning to a different base or communications station during a nuclear war.
@summitap1
@summitap1 Ай бұрын
I agree, also a 737 would have more room. When C-130 last did TACAMO, it was not also hosting the Looking Glass mission like E-6B is now.
@HolySoliDeoGloria
@HolySoliDeoGloria Ай бұрын
@@summitap1Another good point!
@jimhanson2860
@jimhanson2860 Ай бұрын
If you do a video on the Tacamo planes, don't forget The 747 based E4B. There were only a few made. Can you imagine a 747 flying in tight concentric circles for an extended period of time
@johndoh5182
@johndoh5182 Ай бұрын
It surprises me a little that this couldn't be done with the largest Helos in the US military. I know you have an issue with range and there are a lack of carriers that are deployed at one time, but there are other ships that could hold a large Helo, of course LHA/D being one class of ship, but there aren't many of those either, and I don't think you could carry a large array on a smaller helo, maybe not even our largest. And the military also wants to use the C-130 for scramjet missiles too, correct? It may also carry drones and other missles. What a beast, and it would be REALLY hard for another country to keep track of which C-130 is doing what. I foresee a LOT of C-130s being built over the next two decades. Ol' Faithful.
@SVAdAstra
@SVAdAstra Ай бұрын
The subs have VLF (very low frequency) receivers that can receive orders while submerged. VLF signals can penetrate sea water.
@dwightperrin7635
@dwightperrin7635 Ай бұрын
Good video, I worked at that squadron from 1985-1990. For reference it is pronounced "Tack-amo" with emphasis on "Tac".
@h4l0g3n
@h4l0g3n Ай бұрын
I'd always thought that we were using extremely low frequency (ELF) communications from the fixed stations to relay ELF trigraphs. We'd have a long antenna via a spool that we'd deploy from the back of the sail when we were deep. I recall that we'd receive three characters every 5 minutes while submerged (ELF trigraph BJB and BVN are the ones that stick in my mind). If we missed three consecutive communications, we'd come shallow to copy radio traffic. I remember hearing the pronunciation as "TACK-AH-MOE."
@brucebarnes8138
@brucebarnes8138 Ай бұрын
What year were you in the service? What was your rate? Were you a Radio man or CT?
@thekrantz123
@thekrantz123 Ай бұрын
should’ve been C-power
@stephenhoward6829
@stephenhoward6829 Ай бұрын
Do some look-ups. Subs communicate while submerged via a floating wire antenna. Being out of communications would defeat their whole reason for being, that being rapid retaliatory response, the key to deterrence. That antenna can receive satellite communications, so the TAC-a-mo system is a backup to that in the event of satellite communications being impossible.
@user-ij6mf2hp3r
@user-ij6mf2hp3r Ай бұрын
It's been awhile but, they modified one to land in a soccer field! No shit.
@stephenhoward6829
@stephenhoward6829 Ай бұрын
@@user-ij6mf2hp3r They also have landed one on a carrier.
@moriscondo5511
@moriscondo5511 Ай бұрын
pretty impressive to see a plane that size fly like that
@WhydoIsuddenlyhaveahandle
@WhydoIsuddenlyhaveahandle Ай бұрын
Do a video on the Four Horseman! They are 4 aircraft demonstration team like the Blue Angels, but hercs.
@Hebdomad7
@Hebdomad7 Ай бұрын
The way the antenna is un-spooled from the aircraft reminded me of this. Whilst some people here might be familiar with the Fulton Extraction system (if you're not it's worth a look up). There is a more primitive version use by early bush pilots (seen in Popular Science, December 1934). The aircraft would do circles above lowering a rope. Because of some neat physics, by the time the rope hit the ground, it was stationary to the ground but still attached to the aircraft screaming around at a hundred miles an hour. Mail delivery was done this way in Outback Australia where runways were not available. I heard the people behind Fulton played with this idea but found it too slow. Ended up adapting glider recovery tech from WW2 (another fun lookup) The closest live cargo I could find was a chicken and some eggs.
@THE-X-Force
@THE-X-Force Ай бұрын
*_I'M ALEX HOLLINGS!_*
@mattbrown817
@mattbrown817 Ай бұрын
Did I just watch that C-130 invert and loop? Holy moly.
@StrongHarm
@StrongHarm Ай бұрын
Outstanding episode! I've never heard the boomer mission put into more perfect context.
@skramer4
@skramer4 Ай бұрын
Why are so many here stuck on the slight variations in pronunciation of Tac-amo? Really? Anyway.... Alex, love your videos! Top notch and your knowledge base is impressive. Keep on making the great videos! Fantastic! How do you put up with all the.... feedback? Omg!
@theChickenstones
@theChickenstones Ай бұрын
Pentagon to C-130-J Captain: "Code Brown. Fly tight rings and transmit your text message ordering the end of the world". Captain to Pentagon: "Affirm, Code Brown. Rings getting tighter, much tighter" 'MAD' is still 'Mutual Assured Destruction'. As a 65 year old Australian, I haven't forgotten growing up with this bloody lunacy.
@hubertwalters4300
@hubertwalters4300 Ай бұрын
This lunacy has prevented a nuclear world war up to this point because any of our enemies know that if they launch a nuclear attack on us,they will get wiped out along with us.
@Wannes_
@Wannes_ Ай бұрын
C-130s did the TACAMO job before the E-6 anyway ... The E-6s had to have their tails modified / strengthened for the job
@211212112
@211212112 Ай бұрын
Iirc the COG aircraft back in the fifties and sixties and probably part of the seventies had a long towed communication array it could use to launch missiles wirelessly. I think it could control planes too. Idk about subs. I think the plane or codename for the project was Lookinglass. They always had a general on board and airborne above the central US 24/7 for decades ready to send the launch codes.
@bobbernard8331
@bobbernard8331 Ай бұрын
Hey Alex if you could cover the ill fated Canadian Avro Arrow and the cause of it's ultimate demise, it would be an interesting video to watch - thanks a bunch!!!
@reedewillson7289
@reedewillson7289 Ай бұрын
It should be a modular system that can be loaded into any C - 130.
@ronsampservice3066
@ronsampservice3066 Ай бұрын
Good 'ol C130! What an engineering "marvel". Sometimes (mostly ALL the time) simplicity is the best answer.
@therocksince99
@therocksince99 Ай бұрын
Can you do a comparison of the c130 and the new competitor, the kc-390 from embraer ?
@wan3416
@wan3416 Ай бұрын
The C-130: For any mission, anywhere. Bombed out runways, no problem. The C-390: Peace time aircraft, smooth runway to smooth runway. No tactics, all airline flight profiles
@JCMills55
@JCMills55 Ай бұрын
They were ancient back in the 70's when I flew in them on countless deployments. We called them "Pterodactyl Airlines".
@jtb3797
@jtb3797 Ай бұрын
I live about 5 miles from Jim Creek Naval Base, the main submarine communication base for the West Coast. Would love to see a video on their MASSIVE miles wide antennas that criss cross the whole valley. Rumor has it you can send a one way signal to any submarine at any depth.
@capnsalty0200
@capnsalty0200 Ай бұрын
Alex, I was thinking that it was ELF for Extra Low Frequency and not VLF. As a kid I remember a ELF antenna in northern Wisconsin. You are more of an authority then me but that is what I remember.
@Ni999
@Ni999 Ай бұрын
The Wisconsin ELF site was at Clam Lake, the other one was in the nearby Upper Peninsula at Republic, MI. They relied in no small part on being remote and not well known but were later assessed as too vulnerable as land based (fixed location) targets. I blame traitor spies for that but that's just my dorkie opinion so don't quote me on that ok. ELF didn't work out on the airborne platforms, it was considered and tested but the longer wavelengths brought a host of other problems for a lower data rate. They stayed with VLF with various improvements as time marched on.
@gonepostal9101
@gonepostal9101 Ай бұрын
@@Ni999I remember the tree huggers got their undies in a bunch when the word of ELF first started getting out, and I think they had some protests at the sites, and that pretty much ruined it.
@Ni999
@Ni999 Ай бұрын
@@gonepostal9101 And you may be right, that's all there was to it. Marquette is a traditionally liberal college town. I'm almost never that guy, I usually hate that guy on general principles, but I confess that on this one, I am that guy, questioning if there was more to it. I fully own that it's a pretty dorky opinion but there it is. 😀 I don't recall such controversy over K I Sawyer AFB for example but I haven't given it much thought.
@Ni999
@Ni999 Ай бұрын
@@gonepostal9101 Oh for crying out loud now my comments are getting deleted despite being reasonable, polite, and well within the community guidelines. Anyway, I don't disagree with you, the protests were real.
@gonepostal9101
@gonepostal9101 Ай бұрын
@@Ni999 oh I’m sure there was more to it, but that’s what I remember. I was pretty young, but I live on the North Shore of Lake Superior, and I remember extensive local coverage of the ELF sites “controversy”. I believe they claimed the signal would adversely affect everything from children’s learning ability to wildlife and people no longer being able to produce young. Lolol.
@SiliconRiot
@SiliconRiot Ай бұрын
Don't Subs also have a floating antenna they can unreel to the surface so they can communicate without surfacing..?
@Ni999
@Ni999 Ай бұрын
🤔 We used to pronounce it TAC-A-MO. 🤷🏻‍♂️
@Rob_F8F
@Rob_F8F Ай бұрын
Is that a hard "A"? I always thought it was pronounced: ta-ka-mo (with soft "a")
@Ni999
@Ni999 Ай бұрын
@@Rob_F8F Soft As. TAC like tactical (not taco) and the middle syllable A rhymes with TAC. MO, long O, or like Big O if you liked cartoons. :)
@Ni999
@Ni999 Ай бұрын
@@Rob_F8F ta-ka-mo would work provided the emphasis stayed on the TA and both As stayed soft. Probably about indistinguishable from TAC-A-MO like that.
@Rob_F8F
@Rob_F8F Ай бұрын
@@Ni999 Thanks!
@Ni999
@Ni999 Ай бұрын
@@Rob_F8F Welcome! 🙂
@bryonslatten3147
@bryonslatten3147 26 күн бұрын
I was on a nuke cruiser in the 90’s but I had a few acquaintances who went subs. One of them on the Alaska out of Bremerton told me that the Navy has some kind of sonar-based communication system as a backup to the TACAMO aircraft.
@neilfox3208
@neilfox3208 Ай бұрын
C-130 just a rolling down the strip
@jackreacher.
@jackreacher. Ай бұрын
Got a camel named Clyde?
@jeffreyskoritowski4114
@jeffreyskoritowski4114 Ай бұрын
Airborne Rangers on a one way trip....
@jackreacher.
@jackreacher. Ай бұрын
@@jeffreyskoritowski4114 geronimo
@user-ij6mf2hp3r
@user-ij6mf2hp3r Ай бұрын
Great job Alex. I love the 130. What about 737? Just to have more options and speed?
@bryanst.martin7134
@bryanst.martin7134 Ай бұрын
And remember, the message they are relaying is "Don't shoot!"...
@BMF6889
@BMF6889 Ай бұрын
I'm glad that Sandboxx is expanding from Air Power to Sea and Ground Power. I'd actually like to see Sandboxx to address the more finite Marine, Navy, Air Force, Space Force, and Coast Guard news. They are all critical to the mutual defense strategy. Yes, I know that all strategic weapons are controlled by Strategic Command (formally Strategic Air Command or SAC). My time in the US Marine Corps for 21 years is dated as I'm now 77, but my dad flew B-47s and B-52s during the cold war under SAC. I don't know why SAC was transitioned to Strategic Command because every strategic asset today is airborne in one way or another. ICBMs are airborne. The B-2 is airborne. Strategic Recon are airborne. I'm old school and I don't believe in rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic makes the situation better. SAC had the ability to control all of the strategic assets in our military so changing the name was just a billion dollar waste of money to create and build a new command that does the same thing. Maybe it's like creating Space Force when the Air Force was already doing that job. Anyway, our military is trying to find it's way into the future in ways that Congress will fund them without analyses as to why the changes are needed. Keep up the good work.
@JSFGuy
@JSFGuy Ай бұрын
Just happen to be here let's check it out.
@everypitchcounts4875
@everypitchcounts4875 Ай бұрын
Can we get an update on XQ-67A?
@TheMitchyb61
@TheMitchyb61 Ай бұрын
Let’s ride this crazy train!
@ronaryel6445
@ronaryel6445 Ай бұрын
An important detail needed here: The submarine unreels a long VLF receiver antenna and trails it. This antenna's far end floats on the surface and receives the transmission. This means the submarine follows a schedule to receive such transmissions. An Extremely Low Frequency message could penetrate the water to some modest depth on its own to tell the submarine to ascend to receive the VLF message, but dunno if the Navy even uses ELF anymore.
Beating China by flying C-130s off American aircraft carriers?
22:31
Why Russia's Su-57 is BETTER (and worse) than you think
18:59
Teenagers Show Kindness by Repairing Grandmother's Old Fence #shorts
00:37
Fabiosa Best Lifehacks
Рет қаралды 28 МЛН
NO NO NO YES! (40 MLN SUBSCRIBERS CHALLENGE!) #shorts
00:27
PANDA BOI
Рет қаралды 124 МЛН
Why DARPA's MANTA RAY submersible is nightmare for enemy subs
27:49
The SR-91 “Aurora”: The Plane that Doesn’t Exist…
22:15
Megaprojects
Рет қаралды 998 М.
America's 3 New Nukes (and the weapons they have to counter)
25:10
The Navy has a warship problem... (And a solution)
26:15
Sandboxx
Рет қаралды 318 М.
Why you can't shoot the F-35 down (even if you lock onto it)
13:05
The SR-71 was MUCH FASTER than the Air Force will admit
12:57
Sandboxx
Рет қаралды 909 М.
Sidewinder - The Weapon That Changed Air Combat
10:53
Curious Droid
Рет қаралды 2,4 МЛН
See Why Navy Jets Don't Need Windshield Wipers
8:13
Growler Jams
Рет қаралды 1,4 МЛН
What makes the GRIPEN E so darn good?
11:12
Sandboxx
Рет қаралды 315 М.
The most insane photos of a US bomber ever taken!
5:13
Sandboxx
Рет қаралды 427 М.