How to conduct and report your scoping review: latest guidance

Рет қаралды 53,983

Күн бұрын

Assoc Prof Andrea Tricco explains how to conduct and report your scoping review using the latest guidance.
Chapters:
00:00 Welcome
06:00 Outline of presentation by Assoc Prof Andrea Tricco
07:55 What is a scoping review?
10:19 How are scoping reviews useful?
13:33 Scoping review steps
19:44 How to develop a JBI protocol for a scoping review
21:05 Protocol development
22:01 Title
22:57 Question
23:42 Introduction
24:48 Inclusion criteria
26:06 Search strategy
28:21 Sources of evidence selection
28:56 Data extraction
29:45 Analysis of the evidence
30:54 Presentation of the results
31:32 How to formulate results of a JBI scoping review
31:42 Review authors
31:59 Abstract
32:47 Data extraction
33:01 Analysis and presentation of results
33:38 Search results
34:21 Inclusion of sources of evidence
35:04 Discussion
35:39 Conclusions and recommendations
36:23 The PRISMA-ScR checklist
41:47 Q&A with Assoc Prof Andrea Tricco
Resources mentioned in the webinar include:
JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis (Chapter 11: Scoping Reviews):
synthesismanual.jbi.global
PRISMA-ScR:
www.prisma-statement.org/Exten...
Scoping Review methodology at jbi-global-wiki.refined.site/...
JBI template source of evidence details, characteristics and results extraction instrument:
jbi-global-wiki.refined.site/...
The JBI Scoping Review Network:
jbi.global/scoping-review-net...
'Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach': bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentr...
#jbiebhc

Пікірлер: 60

@MargaretOfori-ld8fo Жыл бұрын

Thank you for the information. The content is exactly what I need for a guide.

@janetgarner7326 3 жыл бұрын

So glad I found this recorded webinar, just struggling with the focus of my scoping review at the moment!

@sangduanginggeaw8302 2 жыл бұрын

Thank you for this presentation. It was apparent and helpful.

@davidofili9153 3 жыл бұрын

Comprehensive and highly helpful. Thanks for making the recording available

@JBIEBHC 3 жыл бұрын

Glad it was helpful!

@atikahbalqisf 3 жыл бұрын

Thank you so much! So glad that i found it saved on youtube. I’m conducting this scoping review for my master degree and it’s really helpful. Thank you

@JBIEBHC 3 жыл бұрын

Glad it was helpful!

@munukon6418 3 жыл бұрын

Nice presentation and very informative. Thanks for the update.

@annahlesunyane4641 3 жыл бұрын

Very useful information. Thank you very much for the recording

@abolfazlmohammadi739 3 жыл бұрын

Thank you so much for sharing! Very informative.

@ndasowachitule9080 2 жыл бұрын

Very useful information and well presented! glad I found this!

@JBIEBHC 2 жыл бұрын

So happy you found this information useful! You may find more free resources that help you at jbi.global/scoping-review-network/resources

@subashpalanisamy3177 3 жыл бұрын

Thank you for sharing such an informative session

@donnamac Жыл бұрын

Thank you this has been so helpful as I embark on my dissertation.

@MeducationAC 8 ай бұрын

Great presentation! Thank you

@andersonfujihara1485 Жыл бұрын

That was very helpful. Many thanks

@abrahamkuot8381 4 жыл бұрын

Great presentation; thanks for recording it.

@JBIEBHC 4 жыл бұрын

Glad you enjoyed it!

@p.j3573 Жыл бұрын

Very useful, thank u so much.

@kudzanayinemiahchigangaidz9254 2 жыл бұрын

Very helpful information

@dataunud1508 2 ай бұрын

Thank you so much. It is very helpful

@sharadaregmi2235 4 жыл бұрын

Very helpful!

@JBIEBHC 4 жыл бұрын

Glad you think so!

@callmeadocter 3 жыл бұрын

Thank you for this presentation, it was helpful to answer a few that I had. could it be possible to provide the links that were mentioned in the presentation for references in the results section about PRISMA-ScR checklist and related documents? Thank you in advance.

@JBIEBHC 3 жыл бұрын

Glad you found the webinar useful! Thanks for your request; more links to resources have been added to the video description.

@iffatzafar3785 3 жыл бұрын

I would like to know what form are you talking about at 29:21?. Is it an automated tool to download a table form of the finalised studies?. I am a bit lost for this form?.

@JBIEBHC 3 жыл бұрын

Here Andrea is talking about data extraction. In scoping reviews, the data extraction process may be referred to as “data charting”. Guidance on creating your own data charting form can be found here, wiki.jbi.global/display/MANUAL/11.2.7+Data+extraction. Additionally, this article by Pollock et al (2021) does describe how to develop a data extraction tool that is relevant to your scoping review: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jan.14743. Good luck!

@dimasdimasalang Жыл бұрын

Thank you, JBI. What is the minimum number of articles for a scoping review?

@JBIEBHC Жыл бұрын

Hi Dimas, There is no specific minimum number of studied included in a scoping review. However, scoping reviews typically aim to cover a comprehensive range of studies that are relevant to the review questions. The number of studies may vary widely depending on the specific research question and scope of the review.

@faroukgarba6877 2 жыл бұрын

Thank you very much for this. A very informative video. Just to clarify, we have both the scoping review protocol and the main scoping review which we can both publish?

@JBIEBHC 2 жыл бұрын

Glad you found the webinar to be informative. Protocols may be published prior to completing a review, as they pre-define the objectives, methods, and reporting of the review and allow for transparency of the process. For more information, please see: jbi-global-wiki.refined.site/space/MANUAL/3283910908/11.2+Development+of+a+scoping+review+protocol

@tanvirrahman2724 Жыл бұрын

Worthy to watch for my scoping review. I have a query - Should i include abstract articles for my literature review? I have selected 24 articles for final review and 6 of them are Abstract articles.

@JBIEBHC Жыл бұрын

Hi Tanvir, Scoping reviews do allow for a broad range of evidence. Conference abstracts as a type of grey literature can be included in a scoping review if they are relevant to your review question and meet your inclusion criteria. Sometimes reviewers might limit it to particular study designs. For example, if the review question is about mapping a concept related to clinical trials, they may only need to include clinical trials.

@Sr-fu5sw Жыл бұрын

Hi. Could u pls teach how to do the there step search for an example using PubMEd

@JBIEBHC Жыл бұрын

Dr Pollock outlines the three steps for searching in a short video at kzfaq.info/get/bejne/bLqErJCk1tK7ioE.html You may find this useful. Also, guidance is provided in the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis at jbi-global-wiki.refined.site/space/MANUAL

@rodolfobastianvallekendall 2 жыл бұрын

Thanks a lot for this information. Do you officially recommend any kind of software?

@JBIEBHC 2 жыл бұрын

JBI SUMARI provides support for the entire scoping review process (from protocol to report) and is designed using the methodology discussed in the webinar. You can try JBI SUMARI for free. sumari.jbi.global/

@isabelomalley6593 2 жыл бұрын

We have 407 studies included in our scoping review. I understand we can put the results of individual sources of evidence in an appendix (Tricco 2018, Item 20), thankfully. I'm looking for guidance on how to decide which individual studies to include in the manuscript. I know it will depend on our research question, but are you aware of any similarly large scoping reviews that you recommend we look at for examples?

@JBIEBHC 2 жыл бұрын

Hi Isabel, Dr Lyndsay Alexander recently completed a scoping review with 555 included sources of evidence. You may find the advice she gives from her experience useful. Watch: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/iuCPg5iTva6uinU.html

@isabelomalley6593 2 жыл бұрын

@@JBIEBHC Thank you!

@chinnyebisi9720 Ай бұрын

What year did JBI refine and defined scoping review methodology?

@JBIEBHC Ай бұрын

JBI’s first guidance on scoping review was published in 2025, with major updates and clarifications published in 2020. Here are the references: Peters MD, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, McInerney P, Parker D, Soares CB. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13(3):141-6. Peters MDJ, Marnie C, Tricco AC, Pollock D, Munn Z, Alexander L, et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth. 2020;18(10):2119-26.

@prashantabhowmik7670 2 жыл бұрын

Data charting template link does not work. Could you please provide some links to get the template?

@JBIEBHC 2 жыл бұрын

The link to the template in the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis is in the Scoping Reviews chapter (Chapter 11), Appendix 1: jbi-global-wiki.refined.site/space/MANUAL/4687579/Appendix+11.1+JBI+template+source+of+evidence+details%2C+characteristics+and+results+extraction+instrument

@clementinepouliot3468 3 жыл бұрын

Thank you so much for sharing! What data extraction tool would you recommend for a scoping review ?

@JBIEBHC 3 жыл бұрын

We are glad you found this video useful! First of all, you can find the latest methodological guidance for data extraction for a scoping review at wiki.jbi.global/display/MANUAL/11.2.7+Data+extraction JBI SUMARI is software that you can use to conduct 10 different types of reviews, including scoping reviews. You can see how it facilitates data extraction at kzfaq.info/get/bejne/bMipgsehppelpGw.html

@JBIEBHC 3 жыл бұрын

There are no formal data extraction tools that we make for scoping reviews. We generally find extraction in scoping reviews is an iterative process, therefore, your extraction tool is subject to change. This article by Pollock et al (2021) does describe how to develop a data extraction tool that is relevant to your scoping review: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jan.14743

@clementinepouliot3468 3 жыл бұрын

@@JBIEBHC Wow thank you for your quick answer, I'll look into it !

@JBIEBHC 11 ай бұрын

@myszku1Hi there, please try the link at pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33543511/ to browse this resource.

@Fanclub909 Жыл бұрын

Hi I am new too

@shadialhag6616 2 жыл бұрын

Hello, is it possible to send a more clarification on this topic, for example,pdf file, what is JBI ?

@JBIEBHC 2 жыл бұрын

Hello, JBI is an international research organisation that develops and delivers unique evidence-based information, software, education and training designed to improve healthcare practice and health outcomes. You can learn more at jbi.global. Useful resources for JBI Scoping Review methodology include jbi.global/scoping-review-network and the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Chapter in synthesismanual.jbi.global

@jamess5542 3 жыл бұрын

Are there sample papers that one could peruse, especially in disciplines such as psychology and social sciences?

@JBIEBHC 3 жыл бұрын

Hi James, JBI Evidence Synthesis publishes scoping reviews and scoping review protocols, however they focus more on healthcare. The journal is at jbievidencesynthesis.com

@hgVelvet 2 жыл бұрын

Can scoping reviews include both quantitate data and qualitative data? Or would a mixed method review be more apt in that case?

@JBIEBHC 2 жыл бұрын

Scoping reviews can include both quantitative and qualitative evidence in the form of peer-reviewed articles, guidelines, websites, blogs, etc. Deciding on whether this approach, or a mixed methods systematic review is more appropriate depends on the research question. If your question is about the feasibility, appropriateness, meaningfulness and effectiveness of a particular topic, then a systematic review (such as a mixed methods systematic review) would be more appropriate. If you would like to read more about how to choose between a systematic review or a scoping review, a very helpful article by Assoc Prof Munn is at bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x You could also have a look at the short 'Ask JBI' video, 'Should I undertake a scoping review or a systematic review?' On our channel.

@hgVelvet 2 жыл бұрын

@@JBIEBHC Excellent, thank you for this answer and for these really helpful videos.

@Djibril21 3 жыл бұрын

Hey every1 :) can somebody guide me on whether scoping reviews are inferior than systematic reviews

@JBIEBHC 3 жыл бұрын

Hi Almas, scoping reviews are not inferior to systematic reviews; they just ask different questions. For example, if a reviewer wants to know if something is clinically effective, appropriate, meaningful or understand the experience of that intervention or concept, and they want those results to make clinical or policy change, then a systematic review is the right approach. On the other hand, if a reviewer is more interested in the identification of certain characteristics/ concepts in papers or studies, and in the mapping, reporting or discussion of these characteristics/ concepts, then a scoping review is the better choice. I hope this helps. There are resources that you may find useful at the JBI Scoping Network at jbi.global/scoping-review-network

@Djibril21 3 жыл бұрын

@@JBIEBHC thank you very much for your informative response :) i follow JBI religiously. Keep up the good work !