nice short, where do I watch the whole video? You did not say which link it is. It should be on the top of all of those links. Also a playlist of your shorts would be nice.

@@maxmagnus777 - This short is not a summary of another video, it's its own thing.

@@c0detearz320 wtf

@@c0detearz320 Jinnah was a gujrati not punjabi. And also if punjabi were really so dominant where is punjabi in punjab itself? It's not even an official language in punjab of Pakistan. Pakistan wasn't created to stop potential invasion of afghans in india. Sikhs shushed the afghan invasion by invading peshwar and capturing khyber pass. And also, India was more communist influenced then Pakistan which leaves the thing that they were to stop soviet.

The Song Dynasty also included units of armored swordsmen with long two handed swords in the ranks of pikes, halberds, archers, and crossbowmen. These swordsmen could be used to cut down cavalry and countercharge a cavalry unit with its momentum stalled.

😁😁

XD

Copy them. Don't pursue them. Got it.

_"Mongol Hordes and How To Defeat Them"_ By Franciscan Carpini

Aoe4)

And do not kill his Envoys

@@flyingberserker3965 Don't you fucking dare. Hear that Khwarazmians!?

@@AethelwulfBretwalda pervan savaşı duydunmu

That part was indeed the most important. It worked SO MANY times for the Mongols.

As a great admiral once said: Its a trap!

I recently watched a series on the Punic Wars and I really appreciate your username

Hhh

if it was released earlier it would save them.

The Polish and Hungarians actually defended well during the second invasion. But indeed they both still got destroyed in the first invasion, and later learned from those mistakes.

Shame Skillshare didn't exist that time.

Medieval clickbait

y'all kill me lmfao

kek

😂😂😂

😂😂😂😂

Easiest method: let the Great Khan die from unrelated causes, and they will drop everything and forget about you

Sunset Invasion: Hello there ^^

I wouldnt count on that, one time playing Med2tw as Spain the Timurids decides to ignore the entire eastern part of the map and decided to siege Leon as one of their first targets :')

@@ecurewitz at that time mongols had best undercover agents

@@hisholinesslordpotato perhaps, it that is what saved most of Europe from the Momgol invasion

I put my range units on the front then quickly putting them on my flanks when the enemies are near. Heavy Infantry behind them will hold the lines and the range units can and will outflank and outrange the enemies. It'll always works until you encounter nomadic nations and their annoying horse skirmishers, any tips?

In my experience, good cavalry and ranged units matter more than spear or pike infantry, the latter only needs to be good enough to protect the ranged units.

For obvious reasons, that's also how I fought the Huns in Attila.

I'm playing as England right now, I've got a ton of spearmen, archers and artillery guarding the river crossings near Cairo and Alexandria. Then I've just used my naval supremacy to attack their lightly defended coastal cities which I just sack with no intent of holding. It's a good way to make them lose that massive reserve of gold that they start with.

Put archers in loose formation with pike in back to prevent a charge then wither away their horse archers..... that's how I win in tw. Inorder for this to work you have 2 have 2 times their army.... I just dwindle their numbers with seige fights where they are the attackers......

The Catholic Church facilitated pretty much all education at the time and the clergy were among some of the most well educated people there were.

​@@user-xm4fv5bn1nFirst university was Clerical,oh Yes my lord

Plus the Papal States wasn't a retirement home for priests as the Vatican is today, it was a rather powerful state regularly engaging in military conflict. The clergy had experience in warfare@@user-xm4fv5bn1n

Plus Catholic monks did travel to China and surely saw & studied the Mongols. For example, it was Odorico of Pordenone who reported the repeated attacks of Mongols on a Javanese Kingdom in Southeast Asia (but successfully repelled), during his transit there, before he embarked to mainland China.

Priests were the few well read people back then so it makes sense, shame all they did most of the time was clostered up in a temple with heads buried in books

You never know the Mongols could do that again 🤣

@@darthvader4338 guard the seas too because mogolia has a navy!!

Lmao, quoting King Theoden, the perfect response for this situation is "where was Kings and Generals when the Eastfold fell?"

well the Mongols were defeated weren't they?

@@achmadtitofauzan3809 Quoting possessed King Theoden : "Central Asia is mine!"

quick lets chase them

Oh We destroyed un protected mongols are fleeing We hope nobody chase us Cause that would be bad for th... Us

Mongols: Surprise M*therf*ckers!

Jamal and his homie about to meet Mongol main battle army 😂

@@rekt3619 if they are lucky if not then they are about to meet *Subutai*

Okay that was good.

Good luck!!

Can't wait to check out a medieval history book and read about Dup1237s conquest of Mongolia.

Instructions unclear: I am now facing a Mongolian General who is shouting some stuff in his language.

no, its just "basics"

‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎E

@@mysteryjunkie9808 and modeled disgustingly I must say

@@assylbekkossov6955 that very true

@@mysteryjunkie9808 Not really fair to make that comparison. I don’t wanna sound harsh, but it is true that the Dothraki are kind of stupid when it comes to warfare and the Mongols are a little bit more. How should I say? Higher IQ. Dothraki are basically “LEROYYYYYYYY JENNNNKIIIIIINS!” Literally all the Dothraki do, it even mentions in lore, they just blindly charge into pikes and see what the fuck happens. You could say dragons, but you just focus all the arrow fire in the dragon to stave it off and use those miniature scorpions, too, for keeping it at bay. And I’m also gonna go off on a limb here, but the dragon breathing fire is gonna be counter productive because now you have a wall of fire and the Dothraki……cannot go through the wall of flames, realistically speaking. Why would you do that?

@@russki_dabb872 A battle field has several fronts. Imagie a wall of fire at the back of the army, and wind blowing it towards them. Several scorpions protecting the wall could not stop one dragon. Dothraki plus dragons is an unfair combination. No army's moral can survive it.

GoT right?

Yep, if works don't fix. Until Maurice of Orange started to introduce linear tactics.

China already used this tactics years ago before mongol united in Genghis khan era. China dynasty divide big tribe of mongols by tribute or marriage, so they will fight each other, they did it bcs fighting mongols more expensive and low chances to success

-Your own foot skirmishers to be able to trade efficiently with the enemy horse archers - Well disciplined, heavily armored/shielded infantry to act as meat shields for your own skirmishers or to protect them from cavalry charges - Heavy cavalry to be unleashed whenever the enemy overextends and gets within reach. That's how every single succesful western military dealt with steppe nomads and any armies based around horse archery, attrition and hit/run tactics. Alexander the Great vs Scythians, Rome vs Parthians and later Sassanids, Franks/Germans vs nomadic Hungarians, Crusaders vs Islamic armies, Poles and settled Hungarians vs Mongols in the 2nd invasion of Europe. The execution and available technology differed, but the basic tactic was always the same.

-Your own foot skirmishers to be able to trade efficiently with the enemy horse archers - Well disciplined, heavily armored/shielded infantry to act as meat shields for your own skirmishers or to protect them from cavalry charges - Heavy cavalry to be unleashed whenever the enemy overextends and gets within reach. That's how every single succesful western military dealt with steppe nomads and any armies based around horse archery, attrition and hit/run tactics. Alexander the Great vs Scythians, Rome vs Parthians and later Sassanids, Franks/Germans vs nomadic Hungarians, Crusaders vs Islamic armies, Poles and settled Hungarians vs Mongols in the 2nd invasion of Europe. The execution and available technology differed, but the basic tactic was always the same.

no, its just "basics"

Abbasid caliphs back then were little more than clowns just there to entertain their perso-turkic overlords.

not even a documentary just a 1 minute short

@Ibrahim Alloush Which Arabs ? 😂 It was the Turkic Bahri Mamluks who defeated the Mongols with the generals being Qutuz&Baibars commanding the elite Kipchak army

@Ibrahim Alloush Also to lose against Mongols you gotta fight Mongols Persians never fought against Mongols you lack historical knowledge

Baghdad would have been saved. Hundreds of thousands of priceless manuscripts and books would have not been destroyed and the house of widom would have been saved.

Bro the bull told everyone this shit in 1240 didn’t you listen to the video? It was literally like the first shit the narrator said!

🤣🤣🤣

Don't think that people in that times were stupid, rulers were. I'm sure that many simple warriors knew how to won against them, but they were ignored by they lords, it's 100%.

@krzysztofk1674 Why would you think the soldiers were more intelligent than their commanders. The lords certainly weren’t stupid nor were the peasantry more intelligent than them, they had access to education far about what any peasants could dream of. Soldiers likely had far less information on the mongols and therefore less intelligence on how to defeat them. Lords, nobles, and knights back then were literally trained from birth in the ways of war, the peasantry could hope for nothing near that.They also ended up defeating the mongols.

​@@itsawoodchuck4330blah blah blah if any of that was true Europe wouldnt have fallen to invading forces so many times. There were some insanely retarded commanders. Looking for glory for themselves, they doomed their whole countries. Or wanting to fight head on because of honor and glory and getting absolutely, bodied as a result, when lower lords of those lands recomended an ambush. A lot of them lacked any empathy for their men. Because most of the time you got put in charge of something not because of your capabilities, but alliegances, heritage and political state.

It outlasted Genghis Khan himself and claimed the life of Mongke before Kublai finally pushed through. It really took a miraculous turn of events for Song to fall. And to think Song was one of the weaker Chinese dynasties militarily speaking due to long time conflict with Liao and Jin dynasties prior.

Yah Southern Song did an amazing job and if Menke Khan didn't die in Diao Yu City who knows what would happen. Song Dynasty had really strong infantry with really quality armor prob the best in Asia that people never give them credit for. Too bad the Emperors were really weak in Song Dynasty.

It’s because they fell all the others went quickly. They stole siege weapons that made it able to conquer en masse

​@@wor575I don't think so. The Jin was the strongest but got completely destroyed by the Mongols. It just because the Song have state of the art huge castle and a huge man power to defend with

Makes you think if real envoys had their own fakes envoy who would replace them

Especially in Rus lands...

It actually was. Poland and Hungary both suffered immensly in initial Mongol Horde attack, but they reorganized their army structure, and signed a pact of helping each other immediately in case of attack, making each subsequnt raid less and less successful, making this a border that Mongols couldn't cross deeper into Europe, until eventually retreating completely.

dude, their leader called himself the destroyer of the universety

you say the knights attacked from the hill?

Played as Turks when the mongols came, and I basically use their spell against them, sending small armies of horse archer (3-4 units each) to harss them, retreat whenever is possible and if they were destroyed then just build more horse archers, I also mysteriously found a hill which prevents mongols from shooting below and my saracen militia massacred an entire mongol army before another army arrived and force me into retreat, while cities were far more interesting, I have to deploy a lot of saracen milita in the streets rather than the gatehouse to absorb the cavalry momentum so the morale is lower due to them being separated, but my naffatun are exceptionally well against mongols. But by far the worst nightmare is the Tumurids, I turned off the time limit but they just stay out of the reach of my cannon towers, and if I sally out their elephant guns are going to massacre me, so at the end I just lost patience and quit, but since I have already destroyed most of their army I got the city back next turn.

Was playing as Antioch when they invaded, repelled them at the first city, but only had 12 men left. 😅

@@fsdds1488Historically Turks and Mongols are sibling nations :)

E‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎

The mongols would stomp the dothraki.

Dothraki were based on Scythians not Mongols btw lol

A DOTHRAKI HORDE NED!!!

@@teovu5557 The dothraki are a mix of all the steppe people

Scythians were an iranic ethnic group the main hero of shahnama which is one of the most famous epics in literature history is a scythe, they were Viking looking people with bright features unlike dothrakis

The Iranians said no

Mountains couldn't stop them. Only jungle could

Mongols crossed the mountains of Caucasus on their way to Russia (first expedition), destroying the armies of every kingdom on their way: Georgians, Armenians, Alans, etc. A century later Timur has successfully subjugated the region again. Mountains don’t seem to help much. Being on an island did help (Japan), as well as jungles/tropical climate.

and heavy armoured knights-> mongol hore archers can't run away in mountainous terrain so they are forced to fight melee->their advantage is gone

@@TheTokkie yes mountain goat hunting is mongolian hobby

India is not mountains just Northern India bordering china and North Western India bordering Afghanistan ( now Pakistan) ....Historically all invaders have passed through Western most India and from then....India is all plains....

@@usmanzafar4751 Thanks. Changed and noted.

@@usmanzafar4751 Yeah India has been conquered plenty of times lol

@@user-pn3im5sm7k its probably the one that is the most conquered

@@usmanzafar4751 Nope the british came by boats and conquered india for 200 years

Khazars defeated the Rashiduns at the Battle of Balanjar which was their only occasion making it one of the rare defeats of the Rashiduns

Hilariously enough, the way the Polish and Hungarians kinda defeated the mongols the second time around, was by staying put and fortifying the fuck out of thier castles. IIRC the Polish king noticed that during the first Mongol invasion, not a single stone castle fell, whilst every wooden one was burnt to the ground (as the mongsols were not interested in keeping the castle as a method of control). And so, he ordered the construction of a fuckton of stone castles, and the funding of many more knights. This way, the next time the Mongols arrived, they got bogged down with sieges, allowing the surrounding castles to harrass them with lightning raids by knights. And as the Mongols could not forage any more due to every one of their raiding and foraging parties being demolished or routed, they started to starve.

True The Ummayeds avenged that defeat and went all the way to Balanjar their capital sacking it but it wasn't enough to fully defeat the Khazars whom are nomadic by nature

@@nenenindonu The Umayyads defeated the Khazars in many battles in، 737. Marwan bin Muhammad Khaqan forced the Khazars to submit to the Caliphate and enter Islam after seizing the Khazar capital.

@@abunasirsalahal-dinal-must5201 But that was another Dynasty, Rashiduns smashed 2 major powers like Sassanians and Byzantines whereas Umayyads failed against Romans, Chinese, Bulgars, Khazars, and Franks out of all the major kingdoms they only managed to conquer the Visigoths during civil war

And have heavy armour, if not those tactics won't work as you're being shot to pieces in your close position by mobile horse archers.

i have the solution: charge with heavy cavalry! Flatten them!!!!!

@@renaldiroekanto789 THe chinese did that, didn't work.

@@zebimicio5204 when did the Chinese ever do that, they never did that.

@@Zenovarse pretty sure they did

Jalaluddin Khawarzem Shah.....But he also lacked ability to form effective alliances....

@@usmanzafar4751 Great Commander Mediocre Diplomat...

@@usmanzafar4751 true

E‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎

Not in bannerlord

@@ChristianAuditore14 totally, i lost count of how many times raided villages saved my army. Sometimes, armies 2, 3, even 5 times bigger tried to attack us in village, and i'll be honest, i'm usually surrounded by Huskarls, the most OP infantry, but still... I'll never forget one night, sarranids attacked Mechin. My 134 against their 580 or smth, the most intense 1 hour of my life, i got so tense my back turned into stone. I still hold a dear place in my heart for Mechin, God bless those badly Dual Core rendered non-real pixels of persons. God bless them...

Problem is their envoys would conduct themselves in such a manner that would be punishable with death in courts. And if their demands would not be met they risked the same treatment, so better to kill them off so they don't have someone being able to act as a spy, giving detailed information about the land and the defence of the cities.

Japan did it twice and won, and yes they still would have won without the typhoons. No one has ever successfully invaded Japan militarily and the Mongols were sure not going to.

@@user-pn3im5sm7k "No one has ever successfully invaded Japan militarily" I guess getting 2 nukes drop on them and surrendering before they get invaded isn't successful enough

@@googane7755 Yeah they literally did never get invaded. They surrendered but never got invaded.

@@IpostedaCoDvideoonce So it's better to not risk them being a spy rather than a casus belli? If this was the case you can justify any emissary as a spy. Your logic makes no sense.

being an envoy in the middle ages - the most hazardous job lol

@@lotoreo only more well paid than the common messenger.

Khan will still declare war if rulers can't provide their demand

Don't like Mongolians really hate foreigners and during night time in ulaan baatar gangs go out to beat foreigners?

Get well soon.

would have been better if you had written "Karakorum" instead

That's exactly what someone who was beaten up by the Mongolians would say....

Lol

And spy.

Also politician, scientist, philosopher, merchants, doctors, and basically every occupation you can think of.

​@@ElBanditothey still are. Every priest is an agent of the Vatican.

I mean yes but also no. The stone fortifications of Europe absolutely did stop the Mongol advance but there's no reason to think that it would have worked as a permanent solution. If there was one thing the Mongols excelled at it was adapting and learning to overcome new problems and given that they already had some thousands of European captives, had possibly already adopted gunpowder weaponry at that point and would continue to refine the technology (as well as adopting things like counterweight trebuchets shortly afterwards) it's highly likely that if the dynastic politics had played out differently and the Mongol empire had made concerted efforts towards further European conquest they'd probably have adopted European seige tactics and develop new techniques, learning how to take stone fortifications and carrying on into Europe. (Edit for grammar).

@@Temujin1206 Well if the Europeans weren't fighting each other all the time they could've stopped the Mongols differently too, also the Mongols were fighting each other most of the time too which reduced their power too

@@Temujin1206 IIRC The mongols had very much learnt how to use Gunpowder by the time they arrived in Europe, but they didn't bring any gunpowder weapons with them, as unlike China there were no centres to manufacture more gunpowder there, and as such, after the first few fights all those expensive gunpowder weapons would just be deadweight

@@dragon12234 The jury's still out on that one. For example many accounts mention the presence of noxious smoke and high pitched noises at the Battle of Legnicia, which some scholars suggest may have been gunpowder weapons, though others suggest it was just whistling arrows and smoke from fires. Certainly they wouldn't have had massive reserves of gunpowder or anything like cannons but they might possibly have had small quantities of powder and some handheld weapons like fire lances or rockets, the sources aren't entirely clear.

@@Temujin1206 Which means that the Mongols won’t be Mongols anymore. Just European armies against European armies. And then the problem arises that they would be familiar with the tactics and it wouldn’t be so much of a ball park for the Mongols. Hungarians were still having their nomadic style cavalry and so they were quite familiar with Mongol tactics. I mean, you cannot really adapt to an ambush or guerrilla warfare. It’s not really predictable. And this is where the problem arises on the internet. The Mongols would’ve still conquered Europe if they just continued on with it; they just had to copy and paste what the Europeans have. Well, the Indians and Mamelukes also copied and pasted what the Mongols had. Aforementioned Hungarians were Magyars before and still had their nomadic style of warfare around that period. If the Mongols “just did this,” it would be way too European for the Europeans to know. It’s not really how warfare would work. It’s not an easy solution. Every powerful armies always have their downfalls and the Mongols in Europe would most likely face that. There is no “one good army for all history.” If gunpowder was used a lot, away with cavalry because it’s not a good choice up against grape shot. Or a group of muskets. The Mongols wouldn’t be Mongols anymore in an era of pike and shot because their lustful cavalry would be too easy to destroy. Every powerful armies would have their downfalls. There’s this strange addiction that the internet has about how the Mongols are the only “Wunderwaffen” the universe has ever seen. It’s a weird relationship. I’m just pointing out that it is a little bit more complicated than just “If the Mongols just did this…”

There's no way to stop them from snow balling

@@theguy8729 capture and kill then the culling is the only way

LMAO! Fortification

@@richmondlandersenfells2238 I mean, it did work. During the second mongol invasion the Mongols got bogged down and bled dry by siegies as the Polish and Hungarians had built many more stone castles than before. And a Mongol Army that was stuck in place was much more vulnerable to being raided themselves by knights from the surrounding castles.

@@Shx148 Nah, Mongols couldn't conquer Polish and Hungarian castles even the first time they invaded, European castles were too much for them

*laughs in bioweapons*

@@AK-xi5vy lmfao the Mongols broke the Islamic caliphate, you think some Slavs stacking rocks would have any effect on stopping them?

Exactly. That or go into the corner of the map to ensure that they don't flank you.

This

And then East Europe kicked the crud out of them.

In praise of Tengri!

Wrong the chinese supplied them with the best seige weapons of the time. The mongols just didnt want to settle in cities so they left some behind their lines to ransack once the inhabitants starved to death !

@@dantheman3022 Lol

Wrong OMG!!! Study at Mongol's military tactics!!! If you didn't know about it, just shut up.

@@MajinOthinusCope weirdo whyt boi with anime little girl 🤮 Hungary and Poland was DECIMATED and BRUTALIZED by the Mongol Empire Ogedei Khan dies and subutai and other mongol generals had too go back too mongolia too elect a new leader in kuraltai then infighting happens cause they can’t pick new leader which causes the mongol empire too break up into smaller khanates and euro bois love making alternative theories 🤣 this is just as bad as Africans claiming wakanda would’ve happen without colonialism. It took less then a year too decimate Hungary and Poland while it took decade too so the same for Persia and decades for China 🤣. They made it too Central Europe in less then a year BAHAHAAH

Also they had Chinese and Persian seige engineers. And southern China had more castles that were harder too seige. Even conservative pro euro loser historians like whatifalthist agrees 💀

Which is the main strength point of europe. Mountains, forest (especially in HRE lands), close-located stone castles (like hungary) and choke points to halt the mongols. Very different from vast desert and plains in asia.

Don't overestimate that advantage. China is very hilly and yet the Mongols conquered it.

Mostly in the south. Northern China is alot of flat open plains which is part of why it took the Mongols much longer to conquer

@Joshua Mills You do know that Mongol armies aren't ashamed of retreating if they find themselves in a very disadvantageous position. They would jus run and regroup then strike back....

@@Ruhrpottpatriot The Mongol army that counquerd the hilly parts of China was much more chinese than mongolian, though with Mongol officers and such, they by that time had very much adopted much of Chinese style of warfare.

subutai was never sent to extract tribute or submission , subutai was sent to bite bite bite ..............

ah well, Mongols are inevitable. A quote is often attributed to Genghis Khan: "I'm the result/return of your sins. Had you not sinned, God would have not imposed/projected me upon you."

@@MuhammadRafy I thought that was Attila?

The Song resisted WAY longer than they should have

@@hanswust6972 Thats the reason the Roman's even got out of Italy

POV: The mongols left, and now they are back. With eastern black magic causing explosions like greek fi- oh and they have greek fire too, WELL THAT'S JUST GREAT

Wdym? Just have good weapons and armor, good discipline, stay united, don't fall for feigned retreats, and liberate their conquered subjects. Follow that advice and you're sure to beat them. I accept payment in ducats, florins, and hyperpyrons, Your Holiness.

The only way you are beating the Mongols is scorching everything and leaving them nothing to take just like the Mamluks did at Ain Jalut wait for them to exhaust and then counter attack or lure them into a trap just like they did too

The Hungarians did that in the second mongol invasion.

what happened with Moscow? lol, before the Mongol there was a village with 4 cows

North Vietnamese terrains are mostly mountains, hills and dense jungle so mongolian cavalry tactics are useless. Plus, the Vietnamese used scorched earth policy to starve the mongols and ambushed, sabotage their logistics. Then, the Vietnamese won several decisive battles. Yeah, they defeated the Mongols 3 times.

I wouldn't really rank Majapahit or The Mamluks with the same level of competence as Tran Hung Dao of Viet. Raden Wijaya was smart, but much like the invasions of Japan, and like Egypt, Majapahit had a lot of luck, and he was aided by his distance from the Mongol Empire. At Ain Jalut Qutuz and Baibars faced only a garrison force of 20,000 Mongols, not the Imperial Army leading the invasion, and they still almost lost.

​@@TheSamuraijim87what do you mean garrison force and imperial army of mongol?? How do you differentiate between those 2???

@@nak.lanang because the campaign of the battle of Ayn Jalut was undertaken against only two Tumens (20000 men) many of which were allied auxiliaries, and was won after the majority of the army had departed and a garrison force was left behind. Other campaigns, such as the siege of Baghdad, or the conquest of Song, were undertaken with immense armies, where men were drawn from across the empire.

In the battle of Legnica (today West Poland) the mongols lost so many men against a much smaller silisians army, which was just a small part of a bigger allied army against the mongols, that they had to stop their raid and went back south east, even when they won the battle. It was the first and the last time, that they tried to go west that far. From that day they focused more on balkans and arabs, which caused less casualties.

Hhaha you don’t know anything about Mongols. Not like western country mann!!

I was about to say that! Spearmen and Crossbow men only army. Maybe some Jinetes if you played Spain or Portugal.

At the same time any cavalry would be useless against their archer cavalry. The only solution is surround or suprise.

Didn't Hungary use war wagons effectively?

If the terrain is not too open heavy cavalry can be strong see crusaders vs seljuks or austrians vs mongols. If terrain too open only crossbows that have more range and tower shields can beat them. But it al depends on terrain, training and of course the commander. An army of sheep with a lion commander is stronger than an army of lions with a sheep commander

Heavy armour too. As shown during the third crusade at iconium and battle of Ankara with the ottoman's Serbian vassals.

I highly doubt what you are describing is a European kingdom in the 1240’s.

@@ObscureGaruda I dont even know where they are talking about. The Himalayas? I wouldn’t really say Pakistan and Afghanistan being south of that

the mongols invaded afghanistan and smashed everything in their way

@@DanksterPaws he’s probably talking about Nepal or Bhutan, although the point is that the video is about a guy who gave tips to Europe, not some guy in the Himalayas.

@@magnuscoles5010 Yup, but they were defeated once in Afghanistan (Khurasan of that time)