Taken from the main channel: • Theorema Egregium: why... This is for reference to a future video.
Пікірлер: 37
@2maniacАй бұрын
This is purely for a future video on the main channel. Try to guess what it could be!
@leif1075Ай бұрын
Thanks fpr sharing. Can you share hiw ypu don't get bored and fed up and frustrated with math? Hope to hear from you!
@PMA_ReginaldBoscoGАй бұрын
Gaussian curvature?
@dirtydanthephysicsman1750Ай бұрын
No way if you do a video on Gauss Bonnet I’d go crazy! It’s such a beautiful theorem that I’ve thought about how a video on it would go but if I trust anyone on math KZfaq to do it it’d be you!
@S1GMATHSАй бұрын
Beatiful explanation... It's very clear and easy to understand!!
@txikitofandangoАй бұрын
The area depends on the angles only 😳
@fangjiunnewe3634Ай бұрын
Well, technically all the angles are multiplied by r^2, but it is typical to use r=1. And yes being independent of the arc length is nice
@anandarunakumar6819Ай бұрын
Beautifully rendered. Appreciate the wisdom of the principles.
@berkeunal5773Ай бұрын
Immediately shared, very nice result and the proof is almost trivial!
@eduardoeller183Ай бұрын
so satisfying! great video!
@languafranter3450Ай бұрын
Good explanation very satisfying to watch👍
@nanamacapagal8342Ай бұрын
Equivalent statement, works for non-circle arcs! Imagine a car travelling along the boundary of a spherical triangle. It would have to rotate pi - [angle] at every point. So the rotation should be 3pi - [sum of angles], and the excess is 2pi - [rotation]. This also works on any spherical region, even ones defined by non-great circle curves. Just define rotation as deviation from the great circle, and it should be good
@FlwxXАй бұрын
wow you explained this really well, good job
@strikerstoneАй бұрын
Best video on this topic
@samueldeandrade8535Ай бұрын
Oh my Euler! There is a second channel!!!
@duckymomo7935Ай бұрын
I was studying non Euclidean and was curious about this
@user-mc7bi3mk8lАй бұрын
Gauss Bonnet for sure 👍🏻
@timefuzzball8097Ай бұрын
Just a question. The area of this region inside a sphere would logically change if the sphere’s size changed. I don’t see how, only with the angles, you’re able to accurately determine the area for A.
@2maniacАй бұрын
I would acknowledge that I didn't make it clear that it should be at a unit sphere (I only very briefly mentioned at 0:40 when I mentioned the sphere has surface area 4*pi).
@timefuzzball8097Ай бұрын
@@2maniac I see, but what if I wanted to measure the are of A in a bigger sphere? Sorry, my math understanding is not very advanced yet.
@pettanshrimpnazunasapostle1992Ай бұрын
@timefuzzball8097 general formula for surface area of a sphere is 4pi*r^2. So replacing all 4pi with it should work for spheres with larger or smaller radius
@TauGenerationАй бұрын
so basically spherical integral
@takyc7883Ай бұрын
how have i never seen this before
@dhruvarai1895Ай бұрын
hey, great video!!! i was just thinking, how about just extending 2 out of the 3 sides of the "quadrilateral", ig, then then computing the area? kinda like how we can compute the volume of a frustum of a cone, if that makes any sense?
@2maniacАй бұрын
Not sure what you mean by 3 sides and then a quadrilateral? Do you mean that if we have a quadrilateral, then we can compute the area by "extending" some sides to form a larger triangle, computing the area of the bigger triangle, minus the area of a smaller one? If yes, I think that's possible IF the quadrilateral is made of "great circle" sides, so you can't use it on the quadrilateral-like region in the video for example.
@dhruvarai1895Ай бұрын
@@2maniac my bad. excuse the typo. And yeah, that's what I meant by extending the sides. Thanks for the clarification 🙏
@ValidatingUsernameАй бұрын
Would be cool if someone came up with an equation for mapping the coastlines of the world with curved vectors between continents that don’t touch so that it was vectorized and open sourced
@ralvarezb78Ай бұрын
normally I integrate the surface on spherical coordinates
@beaumatthews6411Ай бұрын
I was going to say straight into the action! I don't mind that at all aha
@janbendrixmalagayo490Ай бұрын
Why is it a/2π and not 2π/a?
@2maniacАй бұрын
Out of the full 2 pi possible angle, we take a slice of alpha, so the proportion is alpha/2pi.
@ttmfndng201Ай бұрын
a is smaller than 2pi, so if it was 2pi/a you would get a number greater than 1. When multiplying by 4pi, you would then get a number greater than 4pi, and find the section of the sphere you're calculating the area of has a greater surface area than the sphere it's on
@mzg147Ай бұрын
Geogebra 😉
@techgeek7410Ай бұрын
For a hyperbolic plane just negate this result
@aymanmansoori8936Ай бұрын
Me not knowing how to measure angles on the surface of a sphere
@gdtargetvn2418Ай бұрын
The angle between 2 great circles is defined to be the angle between 2 planes that respectively consist of those circles. Equivalently, the angle is also the angle between 2 tangents of those circles