I had the same problem haha. What are some things you’ve done to improve your situation? I’m trying to deal with this by consciously spending more time doing problems.

@@ABC-jq7ve I have realised that there's a sweet spot, so when I start for the first time I still try to think why something was true, however now I don't spend say 1-2 hours trying to think how it maybe derived, I just move on.

Problem solving is great however I think what i really like about maths is how very simple ideas form complex results and how you can almost derive all maths (may be not possible) from bunch of intuitive ideas. So tbh I don't at all regret this habit.

THIS!

Same here.

Thanks, Haris - that is certainly my plan. I have many ideas for maths videos ranging from high-school level maths to research level and everything in between. Thanks for the advice and I agree with you!

@@zenmathmind It is very important to me these type of content, so thank you, society all over this planet needs better and easily accessible education, so what you do is very important. *Here i'm going to talk a lot about my views on learning math (i express myself better when i have the freedom to write without small limits). Ao feel free to read only if you want/have the time, i like to talk about my experiences in high detail. *Also this is the first video of this channel that i watch. KZfaq not always allows me to subscribe when i try (something about my number of subscriptions being bigger than my number of subscribers), but usually it only takes some time the platform to forget about it and allow me to subscribe properly (which is usually what happens) So, basically my experience on learning mathematics is the average, highly dependent on memorization (which i suck at), and overall awful. I love mathematics, even though i cannot understand it, which is like loving the flavor of something you cannot bear to eat. I'm austistic, so i don't know if this is something singular or simply not talked about more, but the way i'd like to learn mathematics is rather different from the experience one gets, at where i live. Mathematics when thought formally is usually put as a set of objectives to be achieved by memorizing patterns on a similar way monkeys are thought to do in experiments, but with more independency. This bothers me, how am i supposed to understand those patterns, if i don't know how they were discovered and why, which processes went through, in what contexts, from the earliest to the latest forms of a concept ? I would like to bother learning anything by studying it's purpose in a primary perspective, where i'm put on the place of each individual (s) and their historical and practical contexts, who were responsible for discovering/first documenting a subject of study, and then apply this same approach to learn the following breakthroughs of such subject. I'd like to be put under the skin of all these people who dealt with those issues by practical/theoretical causes, and why such causes are. I don't know if I could express myself better, but in any case I don't care to explain anything that is not clear. If all of mathematics is too long to be learned, then may i spend the rest of my life diving into it. Thank you for reading, God blessings be upon your and your family. Just felt like sharing those issues, because i would really like to experience mathematics this way ! I don't know any works that are similar to what I wrote or anything, but would love to be told of, or even if someone would start (or already has) something like what I expressed, be it in a book, blog, KZfaq channel etc, be it happening or yet to happen, i'd like to see and take part on such journey. Thanks a lot for your time !

Aaaaaand he's gone

what kind of terms did you use for anki in regards to math? i have tried memrise for stuff other than language and found my approach lacking

@@Podzhagitel The best cards use your own words, or your own diagrams. Ideally, you need to understand before you ankify things. I recommend you search for the "20 rules of formulation" by the creator of supermemo. Those are pretty good rules to follow. But keep in mind, initially your cards will be really bad, but over time, with the feedback you receive through Anki, you'll learn to create better and better cards (either that, or you'll cull the bad cards from your collection).

Thank you! It's coming, but not soon unfortunately!

Yes, I certainly am!

You can “make” intuition by going over simple example many times. What we refer to as intuition is oftentimes only a result of repeated exposure to the phenomenon. We feel it is intuitive that a ball falls to the ground only becauee we’ve seen similar occurences many times in our life - there is nothing obvious about this phenomenon to a new born infant for example.

We best learn in layers. Some bottom layers will be easier to learn than some of the top layers. Ideally, we need to focus on those bottom layers first. With that said, many Anki beginners tend to create cards with too much stuff on them. So then, it can be worth breaking up those cards into multiple cards to make them more atomic. Atomic cards are usually easier to learn and test yourself on. But if those cards keep on coming back to you because you just can't learn them, at least, you know where your weakness is, and either you decide to rewrite the card, research the topic further, break it up further, or suspend that card from your collection if it doesn't seem to be worth the effort.

MyPaint

@@zenmathmind can u give the link

@@adeetyachoubey914 github.com/mypaint/mypaint/releases

👍🤣

I agree that to /develop/ intuition you need to do problems. But here I am talking about intuitive learning as a modality of learning (not of understanding). Rote learning is simply getting the numerical answer or doing the computation without actually thinking deeply about what this calculation says about the objects involved. The point is that you can't develop intuition without rote, and rote learning is blind if you never ask intuitive questions to interpret the rote learning