+Scott Hollingsworth Oh, and thanks for the discount code! I might just check Whitewall out.

Just stumbled upon their site from watching an ad they have running on KZfaq, so cool that Fstoppers worked with them as well. I was previously going to print with Duggal in NYC but they're several hundred dollars more expensive for similar stuff. How's your print holding up?

As far as I can tell it's still great, however it's a photo paper print behind pvc, so it should be extremely durable.

M

Your first point is not accurate. You can totally tell the different type of paper underneath the acrylic. I believe the Matte paper comes with a slightly matte acrylic but even with the glossy acrylic, you can still see the differences in paper underneath. -P

+Vendetta Completely agree.

It's not their fault if they break in the mail. They've maybe start packing them more safely. However nice to hear that the problem wasn't in the quality of their prints

I like whitewall. I've been using them for the past three years and they do have great sleek prints and frame for large expensive prints plus they have great customer service. I have also used the other company you mention which also give you great prints for your buck.

These were all shot on the D800 or D750 at the time so they are around 24 - 36 megapixels. They look great up close. -P

Fstoppers thanks!

Fstoppers that’s amazing

If I remember correctly, he shot the astro image with a 24mp d750, which gives 6000x4000 images. Printing that at 40"x60" would be 100dpi. Lower dpi levels are ok for huge prints, but a higher mp camera would have helped in this scenario. (As long as it's capable of comparable IQ)

How would Yes! As an option.

+Aziz Humraz Who cares.

Something I bought off Amazon. I've since demoed this studio and rebuilt it and used tilting recessed lighting for a similar effect. -P

We are working on new images for PR :) -P

+Captura Camera They don't legally HAVE to disclose anything. At least not in the United States where they are based. However, the fastest way to lose your fan base is to be disingenuous and not transparent.

+Raylor I actually thought this video was very interesting and I wish for more like this. I hadnt had the feeling that this was just a 10minute ad. However I give you that that they could've made a better video if they took the time to elaborate which pictures they chose and why and more about how to perfectly light them.

BLoggers and Vloggers actually are required to disclose whether paid or compensated with free product in exchange for talking about a company or their product. It called truth in advertising and is covered by the FTC Act: "If you mention a product you paid for yourself, there isn’t an issue. Nor is it an issue if you get the product for free because a store is giving out free samples to its customers. The FTC is only concerned about endorsements that are made on behalf of a sponsoring advertiser. For example, an endorsement would be covered by the FTC Act if an advertiser - or someone working for an advertiser - pays you or gives you something of value to mention a product. If you receive free products or other perks with the expectation that you’ll promote or discuss the advertiser’s products in your blog, you’re covered."

Ah that was so depressing to read, I feel for you man. I was thinking of saving 60 odd Uk pounds igonring the hanging hardware too. Now I know to just go with it. Hope someone with some real knowledge comes along to help if this issue is still pending to be resolved mate...

Replace this link, because it turned out to be broken!

So what's wrong with them?