A solo play thru of HEROES OF TERRINOTH published by Fantasy Flight Games, "the Goblin Problem". #dalethecasualgamer #howtoplay #heroesofterrinoth
Пікірлер: 48
@peterstein60052 жыл бұрын
That was the best explanation for this game I've ever seen. Congratulations
@DaletheCasualGamer2 жыл бұрын
@Peter Stein Very much appreciated, thanks for watching! :)
@guatobean28692 ай бұрын
Thanks so much! Just ordered a copy of this game and im excited! This play through makes it look fun and easy to learn.
@Utubesuxmycock5 жыл бұрын
awesome man! warhammer quest acg is one of my fav games of all time and this one is really carries the torch! hope FFG doesnt just let it die like some of its other games
@DaletheCasualGamer5 жыл бұрын
I've heard rumors of an expansion ... hoping to hear more from my friends going to the Fantasy Flight Report at GenCon in a couple weeks.
@Utubesuxmycock5 жыл бұрын
@@DaletheCasualGamer def! im excited about gen con, but FFG kinda has lost it charm for me. been buying there stuff since 09' with descent 1.0. but as of recent they have pretty much been star wars flight. and since the loss of GW properties..just not really into them. other games i recommend is blood bowl team manager. its amazing. love to see some matches with that. its a hidden gem!
@bernardgodfrey34995 жыл бұрын
Since they were bought out by Asmodee, they have virtually been Star Wars exclusive with regards to quick game and expansion support. :/
@majkus5 жыл бұрын
FFG under Asmodee does seem to have abandoned Terrinoth for the big-franchise items. The Lord of the Rings: Journeys in Middle-earth is pretty generic, and I suspect that it was a Terrinoth game during much of its development, with the LotR characters and locales more or less just painted on (and, from the videos I have seen, not particularly well). This does not bode well for any expansions for Heroes, which is a pity. It is an entertaining game with plenty of room to grow.
@Utubesuxmycock5 жыл бұрын
@@majkus yeah i think terrinoth deserves more attention and development. has room to grow! with novels for example...i could use a good fantasy novel that isnt written by margaret weis...please! but yeah...i guess we wait and see. gencon will reveal all
@StKnightis642 жыл бұрын
Appreciate the play through. I picked up the game to play solo, and I’m finding some of the rules vague. This video helps.
@DaletheCasualGamer2 жыл бұрын
@Ken Stanitis Glad the video helped get you on your way to beating up some monsters!
@WildestdreamsGaming2 жыл бұрын
Just picked up this game 😀 Thank you for a great tutorial/ playthrough.
@DaletheCasualGamer2 жыл бұрын
Hope you enjoy your game!! :)
@harringtonmartin3 жыл бұрын
Wonderful game. I'm a huge fan of it predecessor, so this is a treasured part of my collection. I'm hoping they eventually expand it.
@DaletheCasualGamer3 жыл бұрын
@Harringont Martin It really is a fun game and I wish they would expand on this game too, but it's been a long time, so not too hopeful. :) Thanks for watching!
@guillermoyaroslavlverduzco15513 жыл бұрын
Just love it. Still play it.
@DaletheCasualGamer3 жыл бұрын
It's a solid game and still in my collection! :)
@guillermoyaroslavlverduzco15513 жыл бұрын
@@DaletheCasualGamer Yeah, me too. I guess it will remain in my Terrinoth collection 'till I die.
@hanspeterschwaer14774 жыл бұрын
Great for learning the rules... I guess I'll be getting a bit more emotionally involved than in this playthrough :)
@DaletheCasualGamer4 жыл бұрын
Good luck!
@guillermoyaroslavlverduzco15513 жыл бұрын
There is no review where you get as excited as playing the game. Very nice work, Dale.
@TheLuminousCleric Жыл бұрын
I think we must have played the game really bad because we died very quickly. We discovered and travelled through the locations too fast because we died really fast in the end. We should have maybe focused more on killing monsters.
@soulnickos22454 жыл бұрын
Does this game have any other modes except the scenarios? After someone finishes all the scenarios does it have a decent amount of replayability?
@DaletheCasualGamer4 жыл бұрын
Currently only the base game, and the designers have been making other games, so no expansions noted for release. So for replay-ability, I'd say its limited. Change heroes, or player count. It's a fun game, and I feel I got my money's worth, and would play it again if the group wanted to play, but no plans to play again solo. Hope that helps.
this seems more like a re-ttheme for warhammer quest the lcg , good game tho !
@DaletheCasualGamer Жыл бұрын
Would have loved to see some expansions for this game. :)
@TheAndrewThomson4 жыл бұрын
After reading the rules it states "If there are no readied enemies engaged with a hero or in the shadows, that hero does not activate an enemy" do you still draw from the enemy deck if there's no readied enemies in front of you ?
@DaletheCasualGamer4 жыл бұрын
@Andy Thomson Unless I'm missing something, enemy activations would not have an effect on spawning enemies ... keep the baddies coming! Hope that helps.
@TheAndrewThomson4 жыл бұрын
I read some more threads on BGG and the consensus there was that if there are no enemies engaged with heroes or left in the shadows then you keep cycling through the turn sequence until you either travel and spawn new enemies or the doom tracker tells you to spawn new enemies
@daviddenby79842 жыл бұрын
Without expansion/s. I feel like this game is very limited. Not to say it's a bad game, because it's not. They left out a cool mechanism that was in Warhammer quest. GEAR! Not just the simple potion, but swords and staffs ect.. I was hoping to get these things in a expansion, but seems this is another ffg forgotten game. 😢
@DaletheCasualGamer2 жыл бұрын
@David Denby Thanks for watching! Agreed, just a couple expansion would have done wonders for the game and re-playability.
@TheRmm19764 жыл бұрын
One weird thing about the rules for me is how the hero attacks first, but the enemy damage still counts even if the enemy were to die from the attack. I suppose they had to do it this way or else the game would be too easy.
@DaletheCasualGamer4 жыл бұрын
Our hero’s aren’t good enough yet for a first strike. ;)
@Michael.Virtus4 жыл бұрын
27:31 - It's not how it works with multiple targets. You can NOT choose where to focus your damage, because you are attacking them all at once. So you must split the damage among all targets. Rulebook Page 7 - Resolving Successes - Attack: "When resolving an attack against multiple targets, after rolling dice, the hero divides the successes among the targets". So in your case only one of the rat swarms will die. 😉
@DaletheCasualGamer4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching, and the clarification. I’m not sure it is meant that the damage must be distributed evenly, so if I chose 3 targets with 3 damage, I could distribute damage as 1-1-1, 2-1-0, or 3-0-0 as an example. I couldn’t find an official FAQ, but found a thread on BoardGameGeek, but your interpretation will definitely provide more of a challenge. :) boardgamegeek.com/thread/2180488/damage-when-targeting-multiple-enemies
@Michael.Virtus4 жыл бұрын
Obviously Carlo Tibaldi is wrong. I just quoted the Rulebook. It's not an interpretation. It litteraly says "divides". 3-0-0 is not a divide. It takes 3 damage and it's not dividing it among the targets, but keeping it onto just one. If we are 3 people and someone give us 3 apples to divide them among us, me taking all 3 apples and you two taking zero will not be fair and not be an actual divide. 😋 Multiple targets attack should not become a Single target attack, just because we don't like the damage division (distribution).😉 And the developers could've easily set a rule "Freely choose how to distribute the damage", which is not the case - it's clearly says "...the hero divides the successes among the targets."
@weemanling4 жыл бұрын
@@Michael.Virtus you're incorrect. Divide means to split up, it does not say "equally" divide among enemies, therefore you can decide to split up the damage by giving 3 to one enemy and 0 to another.
@Michael.Virtus4 жыл бұрын
@@weemanling you are going semantics, but in the end it doesn't make sense to use multiple target attack but to do damage to a single target and on top of that to decide who to kill. Absolute nonsense.
@weemanling4 жыл бұрын
@@Michael.Virtus the point is it gives you the option to spread more damage if you get higher. It's to mitigate rolling seven / eight successes and yet having to dump them into one target with 1 hp. You're extrapolating meaning to a phrase with no basis in the game. There is nothing that says "when you target multiple enemies you must (if possible) split the damage up as equally as possible among those enemies, assigning one point of damage to each enemy first before deciding where the rest goes. A pool of wounds is generated you then decide to divide that between enemies selected. If I choose to split it 3-0 that is just as equal as 1-1-1. Otherwise there would be no benefit to wasting damage if you can't confirm a guaranteed kill. Your assumption has no basis and is a misinterpretation of basic English.
@Loverleezack3 жыл бұрын
Love this game, absolutely despise the instructions. It's an example of how NOT to explain a game