Me

Hello from Türkiye and the timing...

Hi.

Hitties? Don't you mean "Hittites"? They're rathet famous.

🖐🏻

By the way, there is a region in Moldova called Gagauzia where the people speak a Turkic language and practice Christianity. Therefore, Turkey is not the westernmost region where a Turkic language is spoken.

Wow, this video contains numerous historical errors. I believe more thorough research should have been conducted before making such definitive statements.

Seljuks wans't Iranian. Yet some of them will keep saying it theirs because it ruled them for a loong time. Seljuks was oblivously Turkic, you can search it.

@@user-4xislb Its like calling Roman Empire as Roma-Gaul Empire. So stupid but when it comes to Turks everyone doing their best to diminish their success.

@@pandaren_brewmaster well Gagauzia is not more west, anyway Turkish is spoken in west Balkan like me!

Absolutly true

Actually not netlike but beglik

@@timuraykeldi8633 who said _netlike_ lol. In Turkish, it's Beylik, while in other Turkic languages, it is variously known as a Beklik or Beglik

True 👌

@@SignsBehindScience begliq with a Q

Ottomans started to reffer themselves as the "Ottomans" in just the last 100 years of their empire. In Europe, the state was referred to as the Turkish Empire or simply just Turkey. This actually explains how the current turkeys got their name before the Republic of Turkey was even established. Turks, on the other hand, referred to their empire as the Eternal State or Sublime State. After the French Revolution, they changed the offical name to "Sublime State of Osman", or Ottomans, to add a more nationalist expression rather than a random state with sublime or ethernal characteristics. Turks still use the term "Rum" when talking about Greeks. That is the Arabic version of the word Roman. Although it is used only for Greeks now, it was used for all Orthodox Christians living in the empire's borders. Therefore, another name of the Balkans is Rumelia. The origin of both words is Turkish. It makes sense that the Turks would refer to the Greeks as Romans because the Greeks also called themselves that way. Before Greece was founded and European states wanted to establish a state with Hellenic features, the Greeks called themselves Roman and their own language as Romaika (literally meaning Roman language). In fact, stories are told that those who came to liberate the island of Crete called to the children playing there as Greeks, but the children did not understand what was said and replied as "We are Romans"

@@bblunder Good summation but we differentiate between Roman and Greek. We call the Greeks Yunan (Ionian). Rum are the Orthodox people who still live in Anatolia and Thrace.

​@@bblunderConstantine Palaiologos himself in his last speech proclaimed Constantinople the "refuge for Christians, hope and delight of all HELLENES". George Phrantzes, History, 3.6 I can give you many examples were a nation have a different origin from its initial name, so use your small brain to comprehend it: 1)Bulgarians were initially a Turkic nation but gradually Slavicised so nowadays they consider themselves a Slavic and not a Turkic nation , 2)Moghuls had a Turco-Mongolic name but it was an Indian Empire in language, ethnicity and culture, 3)Russians name is derived from the Rus' people, who were a Swedish tribe, and where the three original members of the Rurikid dynastry came from but nowadays they are an East Slavic nation! 4)Safavids were initially a Turkic/Kurdish dynasty but gradually their nation and whole dynasty became fully persianised! Same way the 5)Eastern Roman Empire initially was a Roman Empire but gradually fully Hellenized in every aspect like language, culture and also main ethnicity. The Eastern "Romans" had nothing to do with the Italic/Latin people of Rome as they spoke Greek, their ethnicity were Greek and their culture was mainly Greek. Byzantine Greeks, were the decendants of the same Greek Hellenistic populations who inhabited the heartland of the later Eastern "Roman" Empire: modern Cyprus, Greece, Turkey, Sicily, South Italian Peninsula and portions of southern Bulgaria, Crimea, and Albania, Levante, coastal Syria,North Libya (Cyrenaica),parts of Egypt,Greek Decapolis of Israel etc So conclusively, because the colonisation of the eastern part of the ""Roman" empire with Latin/Roman/Italic was literally MINOR, so the "Eastern Romans" were Greeks in almost every aspect and typically "Romans" ONLY by name!

​Modern Greeks are decendants of East romans.. the east Romans are majority native Greeks and a bit greeknized latins

​@@GrecoByzantine1821you are right being Roman is not make you Latin... That's why Greeks hated the term Roman because wokes only link Romans to Italians Wich not supposed to do

Öz does not mean original, real or genuine. That is a meaning shift in Anatolia. The real meaning of Öz is "self". So Özbek means "A person who is lord of himself".

öz means self in Turkish too like özüm(kendim) which means myself or öz güven means self confidence

@@nadirhikmetkuleli7335 yep indeed Bro 😎

@@bbatuhan_atesli Indeed ✅

its the same thing with emirate,but a different name

Shout yes, I'd love to hear the basics of it, you Magyars etc. 👍 👌☘️🙏

From what I know as an American without much of a connection to Hungary but interested in its history, the way Finnish and Estonian got there is different from how Hungarian got there, and there are some competing theories about how Hungarian got to the Urals, which everyone pretty much agrees eventually the ancestors of magyars were in the Urals and eventually settled the carpathian (the whole story with Arpad, minus some exaggerations here and there). I've heard tho that somewhat similar to Turkish, at one point what would eventually become Hungarian was in the steppes around Mongolia, and over time the magyars just migrated West and eventually got to around the Urals.

Hungarian has to be the most interesting story there is-it sounds like a LotR kinda thing in how they got where they got. The only thing more fictional is that we pretend “Finnish” exists and it’s not just a sea for Japan to fish in

Siz türksünüz kavimler göçü sırasında türk boylarının bir kısmı avrupaya bir kısmı anadoluya bir kısmı rusyaya gitti

Hungarians and Turks are far-cousins coming from the same origin: Huns. That's why you can see the name Atilla in both nations.

emirat means lordship as well though))

​@@vantutri9571Which is the Arab equivalent. How many times do we need to tell you that we are not Arabs?

​@@0Grassesfree kurdistan😂

@@LawPan-gd7nh You mean Dreamistan?

@@0Grasses state of kurdistan.. let them free from turkiye ,Syria, Iran and iraq

To hide truth and history. They still do that around the world today. Look at fake Macedonia state. Kosovo state. Where do those fake state pop up from? Those who rule the masses globally. And Turkye modern one is made by them also, its a fake state political and brought down the ottomans. Ottoman and modern Turkye are two different things. Two different forces

exactly !!

we are on 3 the continent .......

Modern türkçe Osmanlı türkçesinin sadeleştirilmiş halidir. Hatta iki kez sadeleştirilmiştir. İstersen Tanzimat döneminde yapılan sadeleştirmeyi araştırabilirsin; “Yeni Osmanlıca” dedikleri dile. Arapça kökenli olup daha önce kullanılmayan kelimeler türetilmiş mesela.

@@ozanbayrak562 Cumhuriyet, Tahtülbahr...

ULAN (UHL)

Hitlerites?

Glad it's not just me thinking that!

It's just Patrick being crafty, inventing a new name for those people. Maybe it'll catch on!

Hitties? Oh you mean Hotties 🥵

😂

هیتیت ها کورد بودند

@@keyhan1163 No, Drake was a Kurd!

The Hittites called themselves Hatti - fundamentally the same nation but the predominant language switch from the Old Hattian one to a newer Indo-European language carrying the original Hatti language as a substrate. This is part of why the Anatolian branch of the Indo-European language family is so different from the other PIE-descended languages; we don’t even know how to classify the earlier language used.

Thank you pony, who's the one on the right side?

@@kelvinnkat Twilight and Sunset

Fakat Orhon vadisindeki kurganlar yazıtlardan bir kaç yüzyıl daha eski...

i wish they found a written scythian inscription or text bc scholars say it is iranian mix people according to the Heredot said they(scythians) write a language like the persians but this is not a academic proof or view. they can write in iranian alphabet and speak a mixture of turkish and influenced by persian likewise uzbeks and tajiks.

@@tarihbuyutу Геродота нет такого, где вы это нашли, что скифы пользуются персидским письмом?

But genetics says hungarians dont have central asian genes.

The video is just full of wrong information. Just the drawn borders of the Sultanate Of Rum is ridicilous! Thats like a small province when compared to the real borders.

​@isimbulamadm7972 the comment section is full corrections, feels like almost purposefully bad quality...

To be slightly fair, I see It's more like 8 hours from Istanbul to Ulaanbaatar for a non-stop flight. That makes me wonder whether Patrick somehow mistyped 18 when typing up his script. But yes, either way they're a lot closer than an 18-hour flight. It's similar in terms of distance, flight time, and latitudes covered as between New York, US and Paris, France.

Lol yeah LA to Sydney is 12 hours, Sydney to Vancouver is 16 hours. Lol they must've been flying in kites to take 18 hours

I thought he meant 8 hours. Unless the plane stops over in Dubai 😅

Are Hazaras Turkic?

in Afghanistan ? Yes@@ted9030

@@ted9030 homo-- group (biloogy) decentent from turk so yes everyone turkk👍

@@ted9030 Mixed. Persians and turkic and more.

@@ted9030 It's complicated but we call them Jewish Turks

Cheers for the information here 👍

The consensus is that the Huns were Turks of Oghuric affiliation, mostly based on credible studies confirming that the vast majority of attested Hunnic names as well as all Hunnic sub-clans (Akatziri, Onogurs, Utigurs, Sabirs, Bulgars, Saragurs, Baranjars, Kutrigurs) are of evident Oghur Turkic origin Recorded Hunnic names of Turkic origin : Aigan = moon prince; from Turkic aï & can Alp Ilutuer / Ilteber = heroic chieftain; from Turkic alp & iltäbär Althias = six; from Turkic Alti Akkagas = white rock; from Turkic ak & kayač Atakam = elder shaman; from Turkic ata & kam Balach = calf; from Turkic Malaq Berik = strong; from Turkic Berık Basik = governor; from Turkic Bârsiğ Bleda = wise; from Turkic Bildä Bochas = either gullet; from Turkic Boğuz; or bull, from Buqa Dengizich = ocean-like, little sea; from Turkic teɲez & dêɲri; or simply, great lake Donat / Donatu = horse; from Turkic Yonat Edeco = good; from Turkic Ädgü Ellac = to rule; from Turkic el & lä Emmedzur = horse lord; from Turkic Ämäcur Eskam / Esqam = companion of the shaman; from Turkic eŝ & kam Erekan / Kreka = pure princess; from Turkic Arïqan Ernakh / Hernac = small man, heroic man; from Turkic Ernäk Iliger = prince man; from Turkic ilig & är Karadach = black mountain; from Turkic Qaradağ Karaton = black cloak; from Turkic Qarâton Kursik = either noble; from Turkic Kürsiğ; or belt-bearer, from Qurŝiq Kutilzis = blessed herald; from Turkic kut & elči Mundzuk = bead; from Turkic Munčuq Oebarsius / Aybars = moon leopard, from Turkic Aïbârs; or dun leopard, from oy & bars Oldogan / Odolgan = either red falcon; from Turkic al & dogan; or chubby, from Tolgun Onegesius = either twelve; from Turkic oneki; or tumen chief, from Oniyiz Oktar / Uptar = brave; from Turkic Öctär Ruga / Rua = wise man; from Turkic Ögä Turgun = still, calm; from Turkic Turkun Uldin = six; from Turkic Alti Zolban = shepherd star; from Turkic Čolpan

Huns originate from the Xiongnu which in fact is a sinicization of the original Hiung-nu a rendering of "Hun" the Xiongnu connection to the Jie Later Zhao and Yueban makes the Xiongnu's Turkic origins clear

I've usually seen Xiognu being considered Yeniseian which is not Turkic but rather closely related with... Apachean languages of Southwestern US of all things??? (Well, the ruling elite of Xiognu that is, as a whole they would be a mix of Iranian, Turkic, Monglic, Yeniseian, Tungusic and who knows what else)

This is accepted as the fact in Turkic countries bcs that just makes sense

Oghuz-Karluk, Kipchak-Sibir and Oghur. Main three branches of Turkic.

We have to admit, those Mongoloids tribes on horsebacks from Far East are quite bad ass. If China didn‘t built Great Wall, they will naturally going south, but they got no choice thoses days but go west wards instead.

@@merrick6484 Thanks!

Sure turks are spread everywhere but the earliest known turks definitely originate someplace around the mongolian steppe/altai mountian range. Very interesting how many people migrated from this one place alone.

uighurstan afghanistan pakistan caucastan

@@merrick6484 True, but the Mongols were always fewer in number than the Turks, and as you can see from the diversity of the Turkic peoples, there were many Turks in the Mongol empire. The main reasons for the migration of Turks may be the lack of agriculture, seasonal difficulties, animal husbandry and horse breeding, tent culture and expansionism. Because before the Mongolian invasion, there was a migration of tribes and some Turkic people had gone to Europe long ago.

Padişah çocuklarına İngilizce kaynaklarda prens olarak veriliyor Buda zorumuza gidiyor mu yoksa sadece Arapça mı gidiyorsunuz

@@cografyakafas9407 Evet yalnızca Arapça olunca zorumuza gidiyor 🙏😊

?

@@DaveSCameron?

@@DaveSCameron The term "Ottoman Turkish" is actually used for the language of the upper class. Only the Sultan and people around him spoke that language. If was the governmental language. The people of Anatolia could not understand their language as Ottoman Turkish was beyond recognizable due to It being influenced by Greek, Arabic, Persian, and Balkan languages. The people of Anatolia spoke what we call "Anatolian Turkish" wich is the modern day Turkish.

@@isimbulamadm7972 I'm talking about the language, turkic, linked race...

@@DaveSCameron You're not talking about anything? You just commented "?" to @nenenindonu so I explained to you what he was talking about.

It depends on how you define europe

Tzar Nicolas said that about Ottoman Empire as a political insult, then he became the dead man of Europe. One must watch what one says. No?

It's a continent buddy, you might as well include Africa aswell.

@@strickenrod2681 No buddy is not ! Africa is a mass land which is almost completely separated by Eurasia . They only have one small land bridge in Suez . Europe and Asia are practically one . Where do you draw the line border between Europe and Asia btw ?! The Balkans were not considered Europe until 1920s . What do you do about that ?! Europe is a continent by name only . That’s a fact

@@st3019 nope, borders are urals, Balkans, and Iberia

@@strickenrod2681 Is Kazakhstan European and Georgia and Armenia part of Asia then? Europe is not really a continent because there is no natural geographic borders that makes sense.

Right!

Tatarstan,Baskhirstan, Balkaria,karachay,Khakassia,Chuvashia,Altai republic,SAKHA(yakutia),Crimea and about a dozen other areas......you missed a LOT....

We are a huge nation, and our history isn't start in Göktürks. We have history which 4000 years went to the all steppes with only Turkic language. And with our relatives (Altaic) and our far relatives (Uralic,Amerindian etc.) we've 20000 year-history maybe

Goturks were the forefather of Modern day Turkiye, came from Far East, Mongoloid phenotype. Not the other way around. Never heard any Euroasian tribe from central Asia migrating back to Far Eastern Asia. Not even Alexander the Great went that far to Mongolia steppe.

Nein

@@DaveSCameronIssa joke

Hasan abi diyorsa doğrudur

Great job 👏 bro 😎

Cool, as a dude with lot more East Asian ancestry, its fun to know modern turkish stil have some.

​@@PaulVonLoren Dude Turkics always been 50/50 west/ east eurasian, east asian part isn't tied specifically for Turkics, we also have high cacusiod dna

Fake

Türk kökenli o halklar

@@HAkan-hi1ng Incorrect. They are Uralic, as I said. I don't know why some Hungarians see themselves as Turkic, but Uralic, Turkic, Mongolic and othe peoples were just neighbors and got influenced from one another more or less. They probably intermixed with Turkic people, but Hungarians and Finns are not Turkic peoples. Their languages are not even related

@@brillitheworldbuilder Hungarians are closer to us Turks, but Finns and Estonians are far away.

@@Himes5564 They ARE closer, but due to language and areal contact and not because they're related. Hungarians has many Turkic and Iranian loan words and another similarity is that both Turks and Hungarians were horseback riders, probably also due to contact.

​@@brillitheworldbuilderThere is no such thing as uralic. They were all Turkic lands. There is no point of "creating a race" just because there were geographical limitations causing slight language difference between same people.....

Tities?

Und dem aryische? #Farsi

@@DaveSCameron No they were Turks. Ruling elites were Persianized to some extent, however, vast majority of Seljuks were simply ordinary Turkmens. Today what we call Turks are actually western Turkmens and the very name Turk actually means all Turkic populations.

​@@DaveSCameronturkic people are genetically more Aryan than Persians

​@@brainblox5629Aryan is a Sanskrit word🇮🇳 It's a title for Ancient Indian Kings. Invent a word & use it for yourself. Stop stealing other cultures

@@jirachi-wishmaker9242 Its not for any Indian kings, its especially for Aryan kings of India. Aryans are not native to India, they invaded from Central Asia. The Native population of India is Dravidian, meaning nost of the dark-skinned population of India. And Turks were the ones who almost completely conquered the Aryans of Central Asia. Persians are Mesopotamians who invaded Aryan kingdoms that were built in todays Iran. Since they replaced the Aryans they are more related to other neighbouring populations like Iraqis.

Just like kyrgyz people migrated to modern day kyrgyzstan 2000 years ago kicking out saka people

​@@joebidet2050 krgyz didnt come to modern day Kyrgyzstan region til the 1300s ad(less than 800 years ago) Saka didnt leave the general area til the Khotan kingdom fell in 1000ad. (Khotan Kingdom was the last Saka state in the world)

Fazla uçmuşlar 😊 Eğer İrlandalıların Andronova ve Samasya kültür ailesiyle bir bağları varsa bir ihtimal akraba olabiliriz. Olmadıklarını sanıyorum. Ancak Amerikan yerlilerinin Buzul çağına yakın bir dönemde Asya kotasından Amerika kıtasına geçen Sibiryalılar olduğu bir gerçek. Açın bir KızılDerili halısına bakın, kilimine bakın Türk halı-kilimiyle ne kadar benzer olduğunu göreceksiniz. Amerikan yerlileriyle Türklerin uzak akraba olduğunu ilk duyduğumda çok şaşırmamıştım. Dünyaya bu kadar yayılmış bir kavmin Amerika kıtasına da gitmiş olması olağan. İlginçtirki Dünyanın en ücra köşesine gidin orada kesin bir Türk ve Yahudi bulursunuz. Bu iki kavimde bir sır var... Dünya birgün bu sırrı öğrenecek..

@@cagataytezcan1998 Turkiye also a lot of European DNA mostly from the Ottoman era due to most women in the Harems were from Europe and any children would DNA from different countries.

I don't think so irish people turkish but we are friends forever. We sent you aid in 1847 when there was a famine. The British did not allow us to send it, but we secretly delivered that aid to you. ❤

@@christineholliday4564 Doğrudur. Doğal olan budur. Ben daha çok kültürel yakınlıktan bahsettim. Bana göre genetik ikinci önem sırasındadır. Türklük bir dil ve kültür meselesidir. Hatta ağırlıklı olarak siyasi bir mefhumdur.

İrlanda’ bilmem ama galat’ların veya kelt’lerin Anadolu ile bi bağları olduğu kesin

We don’t see, in history, any mongol tribe or “turko-mongol”(?) tribe settled in Anatolian peninsula. The term “Turko-mongol” is used for Timurid Empire and its army.

@@ozanbayrak562 Turko-mongol refers to a mix of turkic or mongol tribes. There are accounts of tartars (which are turko-mongols) settling in Anatolia and would later be the turning point for Bayezid's war against Timur.

@@googane7755 you are mentioning very few numbers of people.

@@ozanbayrak562 It didn't exist before but now they did but they are few? Make up your mind. Anyways my broader point was that mongol empire caused a huge number of steppe people either turkic, mongol or both into further migrating into Anatolia.

@@googane7755 Mongol army caused turkic oghuz tribes migrate to west. There is not such a term “Mongol migration”. Mongols were a big army with horses; just male soldiers. If we talk about Anatolia, at the Beylik Era after the mongol invasion, we just see the Beylik of Eratna. The ruler was a governor of mongol Ilhanid Empire, maybe the successors. But we can’t say the same about the people, or very few portion of the population might come from mongol homeland.

More likely, Turkestan during the Mongol empire - southern Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, etc. The Turko-Mongols came from Mongolia to (Iran) Turkmenistan. But the northern forest-steppe, western Siberia and Russia before the Mongols looked like Tatarstan and was called the Polovtsian steppe (Desht i Kipchak).

Even Japan takes 12 hours (Istanbul-Tokyo route). I think he wanted to say 8.

he wanted to say 8

that's why scholars often call the language the actual Roman people spoke "Vulgar Latin" when it was just the commonly spoken tongue as opposed to the embroidered literary language

As do native Americans, all related.

turkey isnt turkic its just turkified same with azerbaijan

As far as I know it was named after the turqoise water of the sea

@@adidoki Turquoise = Turkish in French. The waters of Turks and Caicos Islands are turquoise. Therefore Turks and Caicos Islands are Turkish. It makes perfect sense.

@@TurquazCannabiz thats literally what I said? I just wasnt being condescending

@@adidoki Well the Turks and Caicos Islands aren't Turkish lol I was making a joke

@@TurquazCannabiz Theyre turkish bro, THEYRE NAMED AFTER US. If Greeks can have islands, Turks can too

1- Yes they were inter-marriafes between Greeks armenians and Turks. 2- Yes it was a long process that took around 500 years to turkify ‘most’ of the region 3- They were Muslims before the conquest of Anatolia but they still had lots of pagan traditions and that never neded even today, also not all the Turks became Muslim overnight it also took centuries and some of them became christian.

RUM and Ottomans had diffrent policies against minorities Sultanate of Rum that controlled the inner anatolia prefer to assmylate the greek speaking native anatolians (not to confused with armenians and greeks, proto anatolians are diffrent people) meanwhile Ottomans generally didint really cared about the culture of the people in they nation, so greeks and armenians continue to live in anatolia until 20th century with minimal amount of intermarriages unlike most people know (muslim women was prohibited to marry with a christian and Turks and christian minorities lived in diffrent districts most of the time) when we look at the genetic make up of modern Turkish people it is usually mix of proto anatolian and Oghuz Turk dna

Fascinating. I visited Istanbul a few years ago and was amazed at the beauty and culture. Such a cosmopolitan city with a variety of people. I noticed many blondes with blue eyes and some had more Asian features (eyes). I imagine this is the result of being at the cross roads of many great empires and cultures over the centuries.

@@cjc2 1-Türkler kız alıp verirken,yani çocuklarını evlendirirken herkes ile evlendirmez.Sizce ne kadar karışabilirler? 2-Türkler 24 boydur ve bu boyların içinde sarışın renkli gözlü olanlarda vardır.Bilmediğiniz bilgiler yüzünden fikirlerinizin yanlış olduğunu belirtmek istedim.

Sakha

@@joebidet2050 We call them Saha Turkleri in my native language which is Turkish.

Like the gypsies

Türklerin diğer bir özelliğide bulundukları coğrafyaya hükmetmeleridir. Bu sebeple 900 yıl Pers ve 400 yıl Arap milletlerine hükmetmiştir.

I couldn't agree more. They even changed their name from Shirvan to Azerbaijan to appropriate Iranian history and justify their atrocities against minorities

genghis khan is smiling in his grave somewhere

It never will be

Germany? You mean the north west Turkiye?

​@@DoofyGilmore1299 no its called türkisch colony of west germania

Very true 😂😂😂

Yanlış cevap. O atlar Mogollarda da vardı. Ancak mogollar fethettikleri hiçbir yerde kalıcı olmadılar. Türkler kalıcı olmayı başarabildiler. Türklerde başka kültürlerle kolayca kaynaşmayı beceren bir genetik var. Bunun kökenine inmek lazım.

In fact its not Gok Turks its Ko'k Turks They were Karluks and Uzbeks are the closest and purest Turkic. and Turkish people mix of Armeninas Kurds and Greeks and some bunch of Balkan nations and middle east

@@amirtemur6872 Göktürk and Köktürk both are correct and they were closer to turks and kazakhs. Looks like you haven't read a history book once. ALSO HOW DARE YOU SAY TURKISH PEOPLE KURD AND ARMENIAN?! UZBEKS, KAZAKHS, ALL TURKIC NATIONS BORN FROM TURKS WHEN THEY WERE XIONGU

@@Turkishhistoryforever571 We are Turkic and plus Kazakhs are Nomadic Uzbeks that didn't wanted to migrated with other Uzbeks they just stayed in Desht i Kipchak land and Ko'k Turks much closer to Uzbeks than Turkish or Kazakhs

@@amirtemur6872 turkish people are not turkic neither are azeris .. u must be really low iq to think otherwise or simply blind

the -stan of Hayastan(Armenia) has something to do with this or it's an entirely different topic? I don't know if -jan and -stan have some correlation. thanks

Actually the modern "country" of azerbaijan was called Shirvan but stole the name of the iranian province of azerbaijan to appripriate their history and justify their invasions and genocides

@@paulochon7692 I bellive the name comes from a rulers name. Hazar Bey Can. Can is a title used on always any one. In Japan it is San, Iran, Yan, Turkic Can. Today, Canim.

@@MarcusLangbart "-stan" is an Iranian suffix, with an Indic cognate "-sthan" as in Rajasthan, from the same root as "state". A lot of stans are countries or states, but Bimaristan is a hospital.

Most westoids, especially americans dont know jack about history, let alone of the "old world"

Because they are not lead by real "historians"?

Hitties are tight!

There is no such thing. You think this way because you are a foreigner and were totally oblivious to the Turkish history, that's all.

Well at one time the third most populous Greek city was Melbourne, Australia…

The population mostly has ancestry from Europe but it's now changing

Yes "Europe" can mean two things: Geographical Europe (which no one really cares about beyond scientific stuff), and political Europe (which is an inconsistent mess that does not coincide with geographical Europe in the slightest).

Transeuraaien language is proven. You came from eastasia. Nit steppe. You here the stupid

@@ChristopherTanne-se3pz can you show me the sources because i couldn't find any source about that

@@leventerylmaz5901 i will send the link.if He dosent get throuth, Google saka issyk inscription and the Name Svenja bonemann. They found a two-language Text that contains the issik(kushana) Script and bartric. There are clearly somebtranslatet iranian Words. They now know Lot of meanings of the Letters of saka inscriptions. I think in the common 1 or 2 years WE will understand much more about this languages. IT IS now certain that IT IS iranic 😀

@@leventerylmaz5901 have you became my informations?

No, there are many many differences between Mongolia and Turkey.

Dude as a Turkish person, I cant understand single word in Mongolian language.

@@_Anatolian_ You mixed his point. "Mongolia" used to be Turkic lands til the Xianbei(mongol ancestors) defeated the Xiongnu and took most of what is now Mongolia. And you saying you cant understand a single word in Mongolian is a lie since Mongols and Turks share over 40% vocabulary. lmao

@@teovu5557 Anatolian Turkish and Mongolian are not similar, there are only a few similar words. Siberian Turkic languages such as Altaic, Tuvan, Yakut have more words in common with Mongolian. The Oghuz were the Turkic people geographically furthest away from the Mongols. It cannot be 40% because as an Anatolian Turk, I understand even Kazakhs and Uzbeks very little.

​@@teovu5557It's not a lie! So why does mongolian seem as foreign to me as german?