Yes, yes! I watch several of his vidoes every day and have learned so much. Now with the PIP-2 project there will be plenty of cutting edge learning and home work to look forward to. God speed your endeviors. Kevin

He has explained Radio Frequency cavities (in his how do particle accelerators work video), but I don't think they were super conducting.

They work the same as normal conducting. The difference is that the SRF has higher Q factor, meaning low heat loss as stated in the video. TL:DR SRF cavities work the same as normal RF but can get accelerate to higher speeds because superconducting.

Tell people the radio frequency is 5G

contribution of india is significant

Electron, muon, tau, and melange neutrinos

Still, PR videos can not replace educational videos.

Indeed

I'm sorry, is English not your first language? Seems self-evident to me.

Continuous beam looks like this: _____________________ Pulsed beam looks like this: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

@@malenotyalc What do you mean? Are new in this channel?

Fully automatic vs 3 round burst:)

In fact India is one of the major contributor!

I think it should say neutral for the hydrogen on the right.

They're optimists, for them neutral *is* positive

Please don't destroy the whole experiment by telling them! :)

And this is how a black hole is accidentaly built!

They are just using the negative ones so nobody corrects the other label.

as someone working on the FCC, let me tell you that I think an even bigger challenge than solving the physics problems we face is getting the funding secured ...

Lol

Dying over here.

@@Chinookman rip

Respect if they can put this international collection of junk into something that can push an atom to 0.84C. Gratitude if they stop screwing up my TV reception.

Cryogenic instrumentation (I think)

Yes, late last week with an error in a graphic. They pulled it to correct over the weekend. Fast I must credit them!

My thoughts also - thanks David W. Was wondering if 'they' somehow made this information travel faster than the speed of light, since the Fermilab video list only shows this one in their feed.

Late 2020s!

@RDE Lutherie I worked a radar site once upon a time where the power amplifier was 4 X626 Klystrons in parallel for peak power of 5MW. Waveguide as big as heating ducts. Power from a dynamo on a diesel locomotive engine. Everything in the old days was done with big hammers.

For this part, even if the speed and energies are impressive, an important part is actually _how many_ rather than _at what energy_. Neutrino beams need a lot of protons.

@MichaelKingsfordGray *Grow. And it's youtube not the DMV. You must be american of you thought my comment was offensive

I enjoyed your joke about python

Yes, CERN and the LHC also do particle physics experiments, but they cannot study neutrinos (or at least, they produce far too few of them and with waaaay too much energy to do what DUNE wants to do). The neutrino experiments really need a huge number of protons impinging on the target to create enough visible neutrinos to exhibit the effect we want to measure.

I believe the LHC produces higher energies, but they do different things and have different goals.

And it's not even the "football" that most of the world is thinking.

You nicked my question! ....... That means it is not totally out there ;0)

The mass is the same as if it isn't moving at all.

And here is me believing that to accelerate Any mass to c would require infinite energy because the mass would also be infinite! Of course I was told this before Quantum Theory was as embedded as it now is, so maybe it would only be half infinity and then only if you observed it?

Ahh! Good to know I wasn't totally wrong then! ;0)

@ Pretty please, don't encourage the use of "relativistic mass".

Barely....

Time and space are dilated relative to the *square* of that percentage of light speed (0.84^2 = 0.7056). That means you have to get a lot closer to the speed of light than if the effect were merely according a simple proportion of light speed. At 84% light speed, you're getting 70.56% of the 100% dilation that would "mathematically" occur at the physically unattainable speed of light. So, at 84% the speed of light, time is slowed to 29.44% of its rate in our reference frame. (1-0.7056=0.2944) So, if you were on a space ship traveling at that speed for ten years according to time on earth, less than 3 years would pass for you and your fellow space travelers.

@@videoinformer nice m8

@@videoinformer the delation factor is not the square of the speed v devided by the speed of light c (i.e. 0.84^2 here) that but the square root of (1-v^2/c^2)...

@@videoinformer 30%...that seems quite significant right?

I also do hate when they use football field, school bus, thumb, shark head, john cena butt in measurments. This is a adult science channel no need to dumb it down. And oh inch pound feet when everything from quantum mechanics to relativity is in meters.

Cryogenic instrumentation (I think)

[1] It is CTMU theory NOT CMSU [2] Langan is a fraud & life failure - last time I heard about him he was working as a bouncer [door minder] at a bar [3] he & his fan boys keep trying unsuccessfully to edit his Wiki page to 'big up' his reputation & to create credentials for him - all of the claims about being a genius with high IQ originated with him & one of his followers - it's bullshit [4] Langan is a 9/11 Truther & a 'white genocide' conspiracy theorist - he claimed that 9/11 was instigated by George Bush as part of a program by the government to suppress his CTMU theory. If the government wanted to suppress CTMU they can go after Langan himself rather than killing thousands of people. [5] He is a racist & an anti-Semite. [6] His fancy jargon is stolen from many sources especially the Intelligent Design movement from where he got "irreducible complexity" & "specified complexity" [7] When asked to explain CTMU in greater detail he gets offended & argumentative [8] The maths he used to "prove God" is nonsense [9] his book on his theory will never come out, because it would expose how weak his reasoning is - he uses the same word salad as theologians to disguise the emptiness of his stolen, cobbled together ideas.

Then the Russians and Chinese will come, steal the results, and force the surviving scientists to work in GULAG conditions.

@Null Pointer Sure it is published, but it will not stop the rogue antidemocratic states from forcefully trying to get access to US facilities, wealth, and scientists if there is no prevailing US military force to defend them. I know, I was there, behind the Iron Curtain.

You mean besides the $70 million a year spent on basic science from the military budget.

@@amandaklapp1171 You're an idiot...

@George Harakas You're an idiot.

Some denizens of the KZfaq comments deny Einstein's research and all physics after it.

Plebs.

@MichaelKingsfordGray many scientists follow Trump?? I don't even know how to reply to that. And so I won't. There's no reasoning with some people.

@@johngrey5806 There's no reasoning with an ideologue John which begs the question why you thought bringing politics into a science presentation was a good idea.

@@sg-oe9wb it was probably bothering me at the time.

wut

That's just the first stage of acceleration, the protons are then accelerated further in the Booster and Main Injector. At the end they reach 99.9965%. Note that the LHC accelerate very few protons for each collision compared to the number of protons which is impinging the target at Fermilab.

@@pierrelasorak3241 Funny none of that is mentioned in the video above.

The idea which isn't developped in this video is to create a neutrino beam, which can be used to discover physis properties of the neutrinos. For example do neutrinos and antineutrinos travel in the same way. If they don't, this can help to explain why we see more matter than antimatter, which in turn can explain... why we are here.

They have a ring already.

We don't! :)