How Wind tunnels Work - Blockage factor, wall effects, scaled model, similarity number, moving floor

  Рет қаралды 17,359

AirShaper

AirShaper

3 жыл бұрын

For more videos on how wind tunnels work:
- Part 1: • How Wind tunnels Work ...
- Part 3: • How Wind tunnels Work ...
In this video, we explain the huge variations in size, speed and accuracy of low-speed aerodynamic wind tunnels. This is mainly due to variations in:
- object size
- object velocity
- required accuracy
Object size
When you place an object in the wind tunnel, the air needs to curve around it and fit between the object and the walls of the wind tunnel. This creates 2 problems:
- Blockage ratio: around the object, the cross-section through which the air can flow is reduced. This means the air will locally speed up compared to the reference velocity, which is typically set at the undisturbed beginning of the tunnel using a pitot tube.
To compensate for this, you can calculate the blockage factor. Typically, it's recommended to keep this value below 5-10%.
- Wall effects: a boundary layer of slower moving air is present close to the wall. In reality, this slower moving air is usually not present and can bias the results. Also, the walls can interfere with the flow & pressure patterns around the object if they're too close. In that regard, it can be very interesting to first run a CFD simulation to analyse the flow and see exactly how large this "zone of disturbed air" is to know how far it should form the walls. One example are the vortex structures around wingtips.
In some cases, you'll even see wind tunnels employing an open test section, partially to overcome the challenges of blockage ratio & wall effects.
Object speed
The velocity of the application can vary greatly, with a cyclist going 10 m/s and an airplane 250 m/s. Ideally, you select a wind tunnel with the wind speed that you need. In reality, there will be 2 main constraints:
- Budget: an automotive tunnel can easily cost 5.000€ per hour. Building one also costs over 100 million euros in some cases.
- Availability: tunnels are often overbooked and sometimes they just don't exist in the size/speed combination that you need.
Scaled model testing can help in that case. But keep in mind that you'll need to respect certain similarity numbers - the most important one being the Reynolds number. If you want to keep the Reynolds the number the same when scaling down your model by a factor X (so length_scaled = length_full / X), then you need to scale up the velocity by that same factor X (so velocity_scaled = velocity_full * X). This can make you hit the speed limit or the wind tunnel or even the limit of compressible flow (around Mach 0.3).
Accuracy
The higher the flow quality or the more realistic the setup needs to be, the more tricks you need to pull, like cooling the air, working with a moving ground or even employing gases other than air at different pressures / temperatures.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The AirShaper videos cover the basics of aerodynamics (aerodynamic drag, drag & lift coefficients, boundary layer theory, flow separation, reynolds number...), simulation aspects (computational fluid dynamics, CFD meshing, ...) and aerodynamic testing (wind tunnel testing, flow visualization, ...).
We then use those basics to explain the aerodynamics of (race) cars (aerodynamic efficiency of electric vehicles, aerodynamic drag, downforce, aero maps, formula one aerodynamics, ...), drones and airplanes (propellers, airfoils, electric aviation, eVTOLS, ...), motorcycles (wind buffeting, motogp aerodynamics, ...) and more!
For more information, visit www.airshaper.com

Пікірлер: 26
@TheOnlyRaceEngineer
@TheOnlyRaceEngineer 3 жыл бұрын
I cannot thank you more for sharing such high level knowledge on aerodynamics. GOD bless Wouter.
@justinchang6763
@justinchang6763 3 жыл бұрын
Nice job!!!!!!!! This will be so so helpful for some people
@AirShaper
@AirShaper 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot Justin!!
@benykla
@benykla 3 жыл бұрын
very clear information, thank you.
@AirShaper
@AirShaper 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much!
@haji_amzar
@haji_amzar 3 жыл бұрын
thanks
@Guess2know
@Guess2know 5 ай бұрын
Hi Wouter, I'm building a big 2m x 2m x 10m high speed tunnel to test different RC wing designs, aiming to fly the RC inside the tunnel to see the reactions in different air speeds, Will this work? Before i invest too much 💰
@Brian20351
@Brian20351 3 жыл бұрын
Does this same scaling apply when using CFD? For example, if I had a 20 meter wing that flies at Mach 0.85, but it is 1 meter in my CFD, would I have to change my Mach number and reynolds number input to get the correct coefficients? Also, are there any other changes I need to make to get the correct results?
@AirShaper
@AirShaper 3 жыл бұрын
Hi Brian, the benefit of CFD is that you don't have to scale your model. But indeed, if you would scale it virtually, you also need to respect these changes in velocity and so on. And indeed, this goes beyond the Reynolds number. If you want to achieve similitude between flows, I suggest this page: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Similitude_(model)
@gibran653
@gibran653 3 жыл бұрын
This is a good video, thank you. I have a question. What could be an alternative when the Reynolds number of a scale model cannot be matched in a low speed wind tunnel testing? (I mean, when you are limited by the wind tunnel facility, you do not have a water tunnel available, the model cannot be scaled to a larger size and the speed to match the Reynolds number is very high so the tunnel I cannot match that required speed) Could a solution be to carry out numerical simulations with the available wind tunnel conditions? (model length and wind speed) and validate the CFD results. Once you have found the correct CFD parameters (also check the Y +), the next step could be to keep the same parameters and simulate the model in real size, with real wind conditions Or matching the Mach number in the wind tunnel test instead of the Reynolds number might be acceptable? (Considering that the speed of the real model is 100 km/hr. So, the Mach number is not as relevant as the Reynolds Number in this case) Or is there some other method to approximate of the results in this type of situations?
@AirShaper
@AirShaper 3 жыл бұрын
Hi Gibran, I don't know of any method that would provide equally similar results compared to the similarity numbers. You could indeed consider running a simulation on the scaled model to see how close it gets to a simulation on the full-size model. But first of all, it might be luck when the numbers match (so do check flow patterns as well) and second of all, the relative improvements you get on the scaled model might not be correct or even make things worse on the full-size model, as you're operating in a different Reynolds regime... In some cases, if you're looking at an isolated part (like the landing gear of a small plane), you could consider testing just that one at full scale/speed. But then of course you lose the proper surroundings. It's always a compromise :)
@gibran653
@gibran653 3 жыл бұрын
@@AirShaper Thanks for your answer it was really useful!
@nikoskorobos100
@nikoskorobos100 Жыл бұрын
In case it is a wing or smthing similar, there are some techniques to induce turbulence earlier than it supposed to occur. In that way you get "closer" to flow structures corresponding to the Re you can't actually achieve.... I don't know how accurate it is and as a fluid dynamicist I wouldn't recommend that. In any case, there is some literature over it. It is called boundary layer tripping. Hope it helps 😎
@aniketsarpate5279
@aniketsarpate5279 2 жыл бұрын
Recommended by fardeen ma'am
@nebulous962
@nebulous962 3 жыл бұрын
can you talk about vehicle called aptera. they say their vehicle is really aerodynamic and that's why it can go 1 mile with 100w. i just want to make sure that it sounds possible to you :D
@AirShaper
@AirShaper 3 жыл бұрын
Yes, it's a fantastic vehicle!! We're looking to interview them, so if you know anyone on the team, just let me know. It has a claimed Cd value of 0.13, which easily cuts aerodynamic losses at highway speeds in half compared to an already aerodynamic sedan. Given those are well over half of the total losses, that alone makes a huge difference in range. And it looks pretty light too, so I'm guessing rolling losses are also cut in half (or more). So yes, I do believe they have made it drastically more efficient!
@nebulous962
@nebulous962 3 жыл бұрын
@@AirShaper i don't know anyone in their team. I am just normal dude who is thinking about buying it and want to make sure it's real :)
@AirShaper
@AirShaper 3 жыл бұрын
@@nebulous962 It definitely looks & sounds very credible - and really makes sense compared to conventional EVs (which still put a heavy load on the environment). Drop us a line once you have one!!
@nebulous962
@nebulous962 3 жыл бұрын
@@AirShaper well I don't have the money right now :D maybe in couple years :p
@nebulous962
@nebulous962 3 жыл бұрын
I guess i could have worded my question little bit better :D
@themeantuber
@themeantuber 2 жыл бұрын
I need to talk to you. I have an idea that can only be confirmed or disproved by someone with your particular knowledge. If it's viable we could both profit from it, along with the entire world. If not, you could still make a video of it. Any way I could contact you?
@AirShaper
@AirShaper 2 жыл бұрын
You can reach us at info@airshaper.com
@Jkauppa
@Jkauppa Жыл бұрын
spin a barrel instead, in open air
@AirShaper
@AirShaper 11 ай бұрын
Would result in curved flow 🙂
@Jkauppa
@Jkauppa 11 ай бұрын
@@AirShaper well thats easy way of doing that tho, circular duct around it
@Jkauppa
@Jkauppa 11 ай бұрын
@@AirShaper its like earth, locally approximately non-circular, ie area and not so curved, spin a large cylinder to make it approximately linear, and yep it will have outwards negative gravitation acceleration
CFD Results - How to Interpret an Aerodynamic Analysis
22:42
AirShaper
Рет қаралды 61 М.
I Can't Believe We Did This...
00:38
Stokes Twins
Рет қаралды 90 МЛН
когда повзрослела // EVA mash
00:40
EVA mash
Рет қаралды 4,2 МЛН
The Most Advanced Wind Tunnel in the World Honda's HALO
20:26
HondaPro Jason
Рет қаралды 16 М.
How Hypersonic Wind Tunnels Work
18:36
Real Engineering
Рет қаралды 913 М.
How the 2022 F1 Aero Tunnels Actually Work
10:13
Driver61
Рет қаралды 464 М.
But How DO Fluid Simulations Work?
15:12
Gonkee
Рет қаралды 369 М.
Vertical Axis Wind Turbine Aerodynamics and Design
11:50
Engineering with Rosie
Рет қаралды 301 М.
The GENIUS of Inertial Navigation Systems Explained
11:05
FlyByMax
Рет қаралды 2,6 МЛН
How F1 Wind Tunnels Work
12:28
Chain Bear
Рет қаралды 194 М.
Aerodynamics Explained: Inside The Secret World Of Wind Tunnel Testing
19:45
Fully Charged Show
Рет қаралды 146 М.
How WIND TUNNELS Work - F1 explained - Sauber F1 Team
43:58
Sauber Motorsport
Рет қаралды 165 М.
Common windtunnel mistakes
5:28
Autosport
Рет қаралды 95 М.
Samsung Galaxy Unpacked July 2024: Official Replay
1:8:53
Samsung
Рет қаралды 22 МЛН
OZON РАЗБИЛИ 3 КОМПЬЮТЕРА
0:57
Кинг Комп Shorts
Рет қаралды 1,5 МЛН
Урна с айфонами!
0:30
По ту сторону Гугла
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
Samsung Galaxy 🔥 #shorts  #trending #youtubeshorts  #shortvideo ujjawal4u
0:10
Ujjawal4u. 120k Views . 4 hours ago
Рет қаралды 2,9 МЛН