No video

HS2 celebrates five years of tree planting and habitat creation

  Рет қаралды 6,690

HS2 Ltd

HS2 Ltd

Күн бұрын

HS2 have reached a major milestone in its extensive environment programme, as the organisation celebrates five years of tree planting and habitat creation on Phase One of the project.
Over 845,000 trees have now been planted and maintained including native species such as hazel, hawthorn, oak, blackthorn and silver birch. Ecology companies along the Phase One route have created 119 new wildlife sites which are already thriving homes for wildlife, ensuring HS2 protects the country’s precious biodiversity and leaves a lasting legacy for local communities.
Many acres of new wetland, heathland and meadow have been created and HS2 has also built homes for wildlife including 2,000 bat boxes either within HS2’s wildlife sites or in existing nearby woodlands.
Around 150 hibernacula and 65 reptile banks have been created which provide new homes for reptiles and amphibians, helping local wildlife thrive and support delicately balanced local ecosystems. Over 160 barn owl boxes and 29 artificial badger setts have also been created and thousands of newts have been successfully rehomed.
Follow us on social media:
Twitter: / hs2ltd
Instagram: / hs2ltd
Facebook: / hs2ltd
LinkedIn: / high-speed-two-hs2-ltd
#HS2 #environment #construction
If you have a question about HS2 or our works, please contact our HS2 Helpdesk team on 08081 434 434 or email hs2enquiries@hs2.org.uk.

Пікірлер: 40
@normhanson981
@normhanson981 Жыл бұрын
Wonderful,thank you .
@IainHC1
@IainHC1 Жыл бұрын
Love the work guys!! Keep it up 🙂
@MassiveChetBakerFan
@MassiveChetBakerFan Жыл бұрын
Wonderful!
@davedave6404
@davedave6404 Жыл бұрын
Excellent. A question, at what stage are the new tree protectors get removed? Perhaps you have used degradable? I often see on my walks woods planted at the turn of the century the remains of protectors and ground cover plastic material, some embedded in the trunks.
@henryvagincourt4502
@henryvagincourt4502 Жыл бұрын
I'm no convinced of the need for HS2, let alone to cost to the tax payer or the environment, but it's going ahead, so this is the way to go.
@a.y.t.a.s.494
@a.y.t.a.s.494 Жыл бұрын
What is the estimate of co2 produced in the manufacturing of the cement that you are using for the hs2 build please
@DavidShepheard
@DavidShepheard Жыл бұрын
It's far less than the CO2 produced on our roads every year. And it's a one off thing. So, if we can create modal shift from roads to public transport, we can quickly get back any construction damage. Contrast this with RIS2, where we do far more damage to woodlands, and the greater CO2 costs of road building induce more demand for road use and never get paid back, by modal shift. When you compare those things, you have to ask why HS2 constantly has "environmental damage" accusations made against it, by organisations that have zero plans to help decarbonise transportation of freight or zero plans for removal of domestic aircraft. The Victorians would have done none of this tree planting lark. What HS2 Limiited are doing here is a good thing. And we need more of it.
@IainHC1
@IainHC1 Жыл бұрын
Fully agree!! HS2 is a new hate project!!.... BUT what about the train tracks and Canal cutting scars created by the victorians??!! What are they now? Beautiful habitats for wildlife and nature!! HS2 line WILL be the same!!
@TheGlassman14
@TheGlassman14 Жыл бұрын
And also celebrates 5 years of destroying it at the same time.
@seekland120
@seekland120 Жыл бұрын
MrBeast planted 20million trees in the USA never thought similar in the uk
@andyaerials
@andyaerials Жыл бұрын
the only people to ever need a hard hat on standing in a field..
@colinmayes9446
@colinmayes9446 Жыл бұрын
Why do you need to wear a hard hat and hi viz vest to talk about nature?
@jamessutherland3016
@jamessutherland3016 Жыл бұрын
And as usual all the whingers, complainers and other no hopers go to ground or look for an other to bag progress
@padwah
@padwah Жыл бұрын
lol, and youve cut down 6 million trees
@tommmorton6625
@tommmorton6625 Жыл бұрын
This is what Greenwashing looks like.
@AquaMoye
@AquaMoye Жыл бұрын
I don't think you understand that word
@1chish
@1chish Жыл бұрын
No Tomm this is what actual 21st Century engineering looks like.
@mouf725
@mouf725 Жыл бұрын
Anti-HS2 people: HS2 is an environmental disaster! HS2: Planting native species, creating local habitats, conducting research before construction e.g. bat surveys, generally attempting to minimise disruption to the English countryside and thereby spending even more money on the whole project Anti-HS2 people: reeeee greenwashing, also why is this project so expensive now??? Maybe you should go and have a look at whether the road-related infrastructure projects (e.g. RIS2) are doing anything close to this level of environmental mitigation. Or alternatively, you could continue to pretend caring about the environment whilst ignoring the sheer volume of environmental damage being caused by road and air traffic...
@eddo167
@eddo167 Жыл бұрын
Should that be so, it looks very good
@paulbigland8655
@paulbigland8655 Жыл бұрын
No, this is what rewilding looks like. People actually creating new habitats rather then protesters doing nothing constructive.
@ranolphwhitehead1052
@ranolphwhitehead1052 Жыл бұрын
Time to start building a railway maybe?
@Nayson
@Nayson Жыл бұрын
They are. A lot of these things in the more rural areas of the line are being built before the tracks get laid but planting trees will screen noise and absorb water which will prevent flooding that may otherwise be caused by the works. Ditto the ponds and lakes, they take rainwater from drainage systems along the track and put it into a controlled area. The fact that it attracts wildlife is a bonus.
@ranolphwhitehead1052
@ranolphwhitehead1052 Жыл бұрын
@@Nayson Waste of land time and money
@Nayson
@Nayson Жыл бұрын
@@ranolphwhitehead1052 too many contracts have been signed and too many holes have been dug to stop it now.
@iankynaston-richards883
@iankynaston-richards883 Жыл бұрын
I wonder how many trees in ancient woodlands you have destroyed. Creating new woodland is not equivalent to the woodland you destroy. It takes at least 500 years to create ancient woodland and the biodiversity it contains.
@mouf725
@mouf725 Жыл бұрын
You are 100% correct, but I'm not sure why this 'ancient woodland' rhetoric keeps being thrown around specifically when it comes to HS2, when there has been little to no attention when roads are built. And I don't just mean motorways, but continued road building infrastructure like the planned RIS2, which the media won't run headlines about because it doesn't fit the anti-train, pro-car narrative that they're propogating. Unsurprisingly any massive infrastructure project will cause environmental damage, but importantly, HS2 seem to be trying to mitigate this. Also, the worries about damage to ancient woodland were massively overstated by National Trust and other orgs (have a listen to the rail journalist Garreth Dennis on KZfaq, he changed my mind about this). And most importantly, unlike roads, which cause environmental damage both during construction and even after it, this new mainline will be electrified and thus pollution post-construction will be far more minimal.
@paulbigland8655
@paulbigland8655 Жыл бұрын
Oh, give over! Only tiny % of ancient woodland affected by HS2 has been felled. And there's far more new habitat being created. Your obsession with 'ancient' woodland means you literally can't see the woods for the trees!
@iankynaston-richards883
@iankynaston-richards883 Жыл бұрын
The amount of new habitat is not relevant. It is effectively sterile from a biodiversity point of view. It does not store the same amount of biomass, nor will it for many years. Neither does it make up for the fact that putting a rail line through old habitat has a much wider effect on nature than just the route footprint.
@paulbigland8655
@paulbigland8655 Жыл бұрын
@@iankynaston-richards883 This is complete nonsense and very ignorant of the actual definition of 'ancient woodland'. Ancient woodland is defined as an area which has been woodland for centuries - it doesn't mean the trees are 'ancient'. Many ancient woodlands were felled and replanted, but are still classes as 'ancient', so your claims about 'sterility' and 'amount of biomass' are merely flaunting your ignorance. But this is typical of the fact-free scaremongering we've seen from supposed 'greens' who oppose us building green transport for the future. It's also why they've been ignored.
@iankynaston-richards883
@iankynaston-richards883 Жыл бұрын
@@paulbigland8655 you know nothing of my ignorance or lack of it. You make huge assumptions about what I understand. Ancient woodland is defined as having been used for nothing other than woodland for 500 years. Of course not all the trees are that old, in fact very few of them are - just like most of the cells in your body are only a few months old. The issue is not what percentage of ancient woodland is cleared, it is about how much new habitat it takes to be considered a suitable replacement. HS2 think only about twice as much is enough. Natural England thinks its more like 30 times as much. I don't know if you really are, but you certainly sound like an apologist for a government and big business vanity project that is eating up huge resources, causing untold environmental damage and which is only ever going to benefit a small number of people.
@douglasengle2704
@douglasengle2704 Жыл бұрын
I thought HS2 was about railroad building. This looks like a bunch of dense car park plantings, nothing natural about it at all. They could have a least incorporated some dog walking paths. A transportation cycle path would have been a game changer for many generations to come through these areas. Just letting the fields go for ten years would have caused natural in fill of the local plants. Car park plantings are the norm for disturbed landscape, but they are intended for small strips of land greatly to break up the aesthetic of concrete, pavement and cars and provide sound and light mitigation for the surrounding areas especially if they are residential. Car park plantings is really the only large market for revegetation. They are nothing close to natural and they look it. Being that they are obvious an industrial implementation they could at least try to make them look a bit more like a decorative garden instead of a badly laid out tree farm.
How the UN is Holding Back the Sahara Desert
11:57
Andrew Millison
Рет қаралды 13 МЛН
Britain's Lost Rainforests are Coming Back - Here's How
19:27
Leave Curious
Рет қаралды 290 М.
Magic trick 🪄😁
00:13
Andrey Grechka
Рет қаралды 44 МЛН
Чёрная ДЫРА 🕳️ | WICSUR #shorts
00:49
Бискас
Рет қаралды 4,7 МЛН
What impact will HS2 have on wildlife?
10:13
Channel 4 News
Рет қаралды 10 М.
How This Woman Transformed Desert Into Lush Forest!
13:15
Leaf of Life
Рет қаралды 818 М.
Bubnell Cliff Farm case study (August 2024) - Peak District National Park
11:15
Peak District National Park
Рет қаралды 502
80 Year Olds Share Advice for Younger Self
12:22
Sprouht
Рет қаралды 2 МЛН
HS2’s Northolt Tunnel under the capital is 50% complete
10:03
Cutting peat for fuel on a remote island in Orkney
16:41
Hamish Auskerry
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
Denis Noble explains his revolutionary theory of genetics | Genes are not the blueprint for life
14:33
Top 10 Poisonous Plants in the UK | THIS COULD SAVE YOUR LIFE!
20:50
Hidden Valley Bushcraft
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
The Crazy Engineering of Venice
9:28
Primal Space
Рет қаралды 3,2 МЛН