I always watch till the end! :)

ok lol

Ok

@@PerfectCocoa the twist is really great 😃

@@WavyAndroid yea i agree 😌

for sure

Though

I’m confused is this movie acctyally called chess cause I can’t find it anywhere even searching up on the web!

Hi

Hi

*remembers helluva boss*

6:45

lol thanks Cubick. I felt like the timing was right on this one.

@How to make ... Just be quiet.

@How to make ... 1

I was just about to comment that

@@kasonyoung8753 Same 😂 guess I'll watch the rest now I've learnt I'm unoriginal lol

@@PurpleOrigin hahaha

💀

I now see that I thought the same thing as everyone else😂

And he sacrifised.... THE GAMEEEEEEEEE

And he sacrificed... HIS WIFE!!!

Thee roookkkkk😂😂😂🤣🤣.....now, the kingggggg

Writter Scarified His Brainnnnnnnnnnn

And the OP sacrificed ... LEVY'S NAME

Akira is a true sigma

Factsss 😂😂

Akira is based 🥶🥶

Grindset achieved

Yeah

"For LIFE"

lol the darker the better!

"For life". Have the complete quote, it was funnier as it was with the rest of the sentence.

I don't know why, but the fact that those jokes aren't in the subtitles makes them even better

Well now days it's the opposite. It's almost impossible for a human to beat a computer

@@mifigor1935 Not "almost", it's impossible. If the top 10 players all in their prime teamed up, had access to all theoretical material, had infinite time and played 10 billion matches against a top computer like Stockfish, they wouldn't win a single game.

The overarching plot was based on Bobby Fischer as well. He quit chess for a while, and his psyche deteriorated.

@@ari3903 no? lol

@@ari3903 Perhaps not if they had infinite time as humans are basically just slow computers

lol

Mom and you are just a pawn who will be sacrificed next :)

typical moves, could’ve used a different strat.

Good one

How did the queen go from g5 to f8😂😂😂 and why not Nxg5 after Qg5?😂 PS: I know its a joke, but as a chess player, I find these moves more funny.

also "never lost a game in his life" and "firt player ever to be beaten by a computer"... I don't think the guys who wrote the movie know a lot about recent chess history. Not to talk about the fact that the public and commentator ridicule him for it life

But from what I understood he was the first to loose so it's kinda different

@@giacomomeluzzi280 can't a movie be different from real life

@@giacomomeluzzi280 I don’t think you know what a movie is…..

@@corimoon3360 a movie can make sense and still be a movie. Sure, suspension of disbelief and all of that, but you can't excuse everything with it.

Imagine him saying :"Aw,who cares about that b*tch imma regain my reputation on chess"

@@stavros222 imagine a giant dog eating everyone there and spoiling the show.

@EvilisaGirl why not. Its a movie it deserves a little satire

I mean, he could checkmate the old man but he decided to protect his wife, so technically he was winning

No, in traditional chess you can actually blunder your king. If you miss a checkmate your opponent can take your king and it would count as a win.

@@Disanem oh alright

@@Disanem Oh damn I didn't know that.

@@Disanem where did you get this from? what's the traditional chess you're speaking of?

what if he sacrificed his wife? that would be soooo awkward

Rich person games. Not entirely dissimilar from Squid Game!

@Safwaan yeah you can only imagine how the pressure would get to you at that level of competition. Not to mention your brain running possible moves nonstop.

Why did he stop playing chess after loosing against bot, when current world Champion Magnus Carlsen does not stop playing chess after loosing against bot, because he knows how much better the bot is in the game of chess.

​@@jout738 Because he was publicly humiliated by the media, the audience, and even the host.

well he is a laughable "gm" since he made the most stupefied move in climax scene.

if it's real life, people would react "Shit, AI will takeover the world" instead of making fun of him.

A computer can see every single move that exists and could happen. Especially today's computers and software. Every single chess scenario in the universe is like a drop of water in an ocean of what a modern computer can pull off. I'm really high idk if I typed that last sentence correctly but I tried my best.

I looked it up and this was released in 2000, a few years after Deep Blue made headlines.

@@user-vy8op6rr8r I wish I could wrap my head around that more. I'm not a chess player lol. I just can't see a properly done software not being able to forsee any and every outcome at any time regardless of illegal moves. But again I say, I'm not a chess player so I can't fully wrap my head around it haha.

Imagine if he did choose to kill the queen tho. Gonna be hella awkward

I was expecting his wife set everything up at the end.

The ssecond i saw her smiling and clapping i expected that too

@@WinterSWW indeed, I was thinking she trying to get his money after he dead or something else.

Same lol

Wow hi Hikaru

lol only 7 likes. gtfo

shocked to see that this isnt popular yet after a year

Hey someone told me to go ask Joe. Do you know who Joe is

Yes, please

I was totally thinking the same thing hahaha

Ikr he would be so traumatized

Maybe he didnt feel as humolated anymore, so countinued to play chess still.

Is it that in chess you still cant put king infront the queen, because if you lose the king. The game is over, so all times when king is threathed you must protect the king or move th king, but you cant put king infront something to defend something with king.

An accurate summary of this movie would be: Are you severely depressed? We can cure that by putting you through trauma! Okay I know it's just a film, but if it were real life Akira would have serious trust issues afterwards.

Hes in shock

Becomes soccer player

@@captainpepperv2702 brutal🤕

it's a placebo effect

Maybe the rook just hit akira really hard

Old man use trauma x 2! (Trauma x 2 was very effective)

No, Akira Have DEPRESSION And The Idea Is, To Give His Brain PTSD..... So His Brain Forget About The Depression He's Suffering (Depression Makes Him Lost His Willpower To Life ,, Trauma Actually Scare Him AND FORCE Him To Keep Moving To Avoid Something He Afraid Of) (At Least This Is What I Catch, It's Possibly A Joke... But This Method Is Actually A Thing, And Quite Effective One)

Yes

LOL

WAIT LOL I DIDNT EVEN REALIZE THAT

He hasn't played chess in a while

@@charlie8344 right

@@charlie8344 Hahaha

akira built different

I guess akira will having PTSD

I aint gonna read all of that

Ikr?

i mean maybe the two ptsds will cancel each other out yaknow

There was nothing else he could have done to win without his wife dying

True. The odds of winning against a computer is absolutely close to zero.

I was thinking the exact same thing. At first I thought it to be a nod to Garry Kaspeov vs Deep blue match

@@summertriangle4745 that’s why we want to use a computer when playing against a person

What's the point of watching a chess match with comps playing anyway, aside from admiring the absolute psychic like move predictions I guess. If there's no mistakes and everything is calculated perfectly you'd just straight up know who'll win, not really that exciting imo

Grand Masters use chess engines to improve. Seems more logical then giving up on life

Yeah, as someone who is decent at chess even the recap hurt to watch. I probably couldn't stand watching the full movie.

Illegal move

xD

@Matthew Dwyer computer couldn't comprehend why the board was broken.....

It’s the King sacrifice. Someone used it on Hikaru once so it must be legit 😂

B seems fun

More immersed haha. Some ppl are so depressed they don't even listen anymore.

actually the game is the therapy which means A=B

With B, you can write a best selling novel and make millions.

@@ryanpayne7707 or make a movie, just saying.

Just the comment I was looking for 😂

it was so illegal that Deeb Blue computer burst into flames

The thing is, they said if he did a illegal move, he would die, which he supposedly accomplished

Illegal move gets him killed. Didn't it tho?

@@rani_3133 maybe they said get him killed means..kill his old self..just my theory

And he said it so clamly

🤣🤣🤣

Also the "screw his wife" 🤣

I'm literally laughing crying from his comments.

As soon as he said it i scrolled the comments to confirm what I heard lol

Only chess player know it

frrrr

You guys don't do that?

Yeahhh lol

@@dionel1388 it's impossible so no

Maybe it's how they resign.

sniper at first : YOU WEREN'T SUPPOSED TO DO THAT

@@vinzsamson7057 Even if you're talking about a gentleman's resignation where the player moves his king into a position which it can become checkmated in the upcoming moves, you cannot legally place your king directly into a check.

Because the first time was just to end the game, the second time was an intentional self sacrifice for his wife. The second time was more decisive and clear.

Chess has been offended so bad

I literally didn’t ask

Lmao this channel makes good jokes

Akira is tripping balls

@@TannerGoated no one ask if you ask

lol I'm glad nothing! Happy to bring some humor to the fold

The trauma clearly cancels each other out!

Double negative makes a plus am I right?

@@diamocube5048 You have a point

@@diamocube5048 and I guess 2 souths repel too, cancelling out the trauma

I was more curious with how could he get to a position where he lost his knight and rook. Also, that the enemy would capture the queen while being checked by a knight.

Yes but it's based on the Real life, when GM Garry Kasparov (World champion) lost for the first time to a computer(deep blue) and because back then there were not computers like we knows today, people were surprise how a computer can defeat a human.

@@fardinsediqi7583 Considering computer at that time wast just a little bit smarter than calculator, of course they would be surprised. Even now people still freak out when computer can do better job than them (especially mundane repetitive stuff).

@@Dismiazs I know. Deep blue was the first computer that could calculate better than humans (in chess)

@@anjafrohlich1170 Humans build computers a computer is faster but man is superior always and always will be. The builder is alway superior to the thing being built …because it is made by man’s brilliance that thought of it in the first place. It’s like the hare and the turtle faster is not all it takes ….man will always win against machine ultimately he can just shut it off.

They make a shit movie sound amazing

@@lmao9526 true

No lie

@@lmao9526 honestly still a good movie

Were not just telling movies, were changing lives... wait wrong channel

thx for the spoiler!

@@justbored9415 Then don't freaking read the comments before watching the vid. 🙄🤦🏿‍♂️

HEY! Guys this is a bot that copies two peoples comments and pastes them into one! Do not keep giving him likes!!!

@@ohnojericho_ hmm who u talking 'bout dawg?

@@GrandpaStories826 you dawg

No u must face ur fear

Bro.. Losing to computers before (especially as a world champion) was something that seemed impossible. Obviously he'll be shocked.. It's a 2000 movie

@@user-fl1st2ot2p Even World Champions lose games. A loss to a computer wouldn't be that melodramatic, and the commentator wouldn't mock him for his loss (unless maybe he was known for being an asshole). The general reaction would be "Oh cool, AI can finally play against Chess Masters"

@@theshlauf Yeah it shouldn't but it's a movie so it shouldn't matter

@@user-fl1st2ot2p the plot is still way too ridiculous

Lol, as someone said, moving king to block for queen is an illegal move to begin with, but the movie just did what the movie wanted

@@aaabbb-py5xd "the movie did what the movie wanted" lmao

@@aaabbb-py5xd Did you watch the video? It literally addresses that and is why the Super Blue shut off.

Narrator is a top 😳😳😳

As with everything you try hard to do

I love how world thinks losing to a chess computer is bad because many think of chess bots as bots in shooter games which is not the case One of the first chess computers went off against Gary Kasparov, the greatest player of his time and gave him a massive competition, computers are able to analyze and think of moves ahead, if the position is +1 the computer will convert it to +11 I can barely keep up against stockfish level three and have never won a single round against stockfish level 4, stockfish 14 is already a nightmare

@@shubverse my nightmare is stockfish level 4

@@Xcal3113 stockfish level 3 is quite human like so i find it better for practice, it has moves which are more human and help a lot with my 1500 rated games Haven't dipped into stockfish 4 but will do once i hit 1700

no one asked

@@beamzsalt4252 but I wanted to tell

@@beamzsalt4252 cope seethe and dilate.

@@beamzsalt4252 leave the kid alone, I was the one who asked

@@beamzsalt4252 Get out of here.

We already have those

🤔😁What about a ...Jeep?

@@cherias.4069 A jeep moves diagonally?

@@chinchang5117 it’s called ‘4 Wheel Steering’ (or All Wheel Steering)

use a crane

More than that, putting the king into some position just to be taken by some other piece is an illegal move, so you just lose instantly

Yeah, the game ends when the king cannot escape imminent death, not when it is captured.

That's the thing, Akira made the illegal move to move his king into Checkmate position, which is impossible, this is the reason the computer Super Blue "malfunctioned"

Humiliation by a lot of people can do that especially if the person suffers from depression before.

@@rathinasabapathy3796 well the premise of the movie itself is wrong. A chess player that never lose is simply impossible. I don't believe there's are chess player that never get scholared before

@@heartmint7364 well just imagine a person with above average skills. Having his life be somewhat at ease as they steamroll through challenges... Until they've met a wall that they just can't seem to climb. The person has never struggled before in his life, meanwhile his peers (who struggled through the challenges that he steamrolled) are slowly climbing up the wall as they're used to struggles, while our guy here doesn't seem to make any progress at all... The last part may not do anything about the movie, but you get the point.

@@4GRJ i completely understand what you're saying. But as i said earlier, the premise of the movie itself is wrong. Even the World Champion still losing game on a daily basis in chess

@@heartmint7364 Well they still have the liberty to make that up. For instance (sorry if this is silly) in the Original Beyblade anime, there’s a character that has never lost to anyone in ANY game. So once he’s beaten in the show, he sinks into insanity, not unlike Akira does

Haha I know this one.

Yes

Hikaru: "are you serious with this?" Spectators: *blankly questioning everything*

Do you mean the game where the two kings kissed each other?

We call that resigning with dignity.

No lies were told

With friends like this who needs enemies?

LMAO

Sacrifice his wife= sigma grindset 💀

cringe

@@aidanprinsloo5473 f***ing ppl who can't just be honest

Thats probably because of Placebo He thinked He Got stepped and Adrenalin and some shit rushed in his Body and then He falled to the ground because He thinked it and ive you get stabbed most times you dont feel the pain

To when you get stabbed in the neck really fast you dont realize you got stabbed First you dont feeling any pain you can feel the blood coming out very much and then you loose all your grip depends on which side of the neck you get hit when the right your whole arm and feet feel like paralysed and you fall to the ground ive you loose more blood then you cant hold your neck anymore because you are to weak You hear a strong ringing in your head or other sounds its getting louder and louder and then you pass out black out there is minimal chance to save you then but it is possible

Placebo effect

True lol

Yeah:). Nice accent to.

Thank you xify

It isn’t he is just a sore loser

@@enderking1651 But they said people made fun of him after he lost

@@TheModeler99 this is a a movie that came out in the year 2000. The perception then was that humans were supposed to be better at the game because the concept of computers playing chess was still in its infancy in the 80s and early 90s and were very weak. Suddenly in 1996, Deep Blue - a computer, defeated the then world champion Garry Kasparov. People then also laughed at the loss bcoz they never new how good computers are and will get in the future. So it makes sense why they may have laughed. However, I’m pretty sure no one will laugh now since there is no person who can defeat the strongest computer. Maybe they can barely draw games.

@@mohitmohan7375 they’ll still claim people “beat” computers, but I assume that’s because the computer gms are playing against are “set” or just not well done enough and only telling it to perceive a set number of moves (either ahead or set what can be played on each turn) I say this because that Swedish Karl prodigy guy (I’m not that into chess) I remember them saying he was beating computers or something

Because the machine isn't human and it did his job better than him or any other human. If a robot took your job you would probably understand.

Literally 🤣🤣