E

It do have gas tho

Ain't got no gas in it. -Winston Churchill 1940

Luigi Cadorna after the 12 battle of the Anzo, leads to another 30,000 Italians making appointments with God 😮

WW1 generals were just built different

@@selectionn Its all that lead paint and mercury coated hats.

​@@selectionnIt's actually kinda the opposite. They were built the same as the generals before, which was the problem.

“That’s SOMME bullshit”

Gotta love swimmy diplomacy.

Sadly it may have to go on pause until the next DLC as the views have been dropping over the last few videos. Regardless of views though I will have a video on the new DLC when it's out

@@Bokoen1 All videos except the last one with 110k seem to have around 170-180k views so not too bad, steel div vids average like 130k too but I find them quite funny even tho I don't play the game

@@Bokoen1 :( I get it though...

@@Bokoen1 How about more Empire At War?

@@viktorsalinovic7260 I mean never mind I guess, the video ended up pulling its weight lmao

I’m sure sending a single tank in by itself will totally work this time!

you remind me of someone

@@deeznoots6241 Bo- There's only one slight problem Swimmy - The fact everyone gets slaughtered in the first 30 seconds? Bo- Precisely!

@@thecommunistdoggo1008 bo: :so we are trying to uplift the morale of the men. swimmy: :your resignation and suicide would suffice.

*whistling intensifies*

Men of war has that too and its pretty good for ambushing unsuspecting tanks

I figured it was part of a mod because, well it's just wrong. Most tanks are flame-proof, especially anything post 1940. A flamethrower shot to the engine deck of a tank sustained for a few seconds would smother the engine and cause it to stall. Longer exposure and the engine might ingest the flame mixture and be ruined entirely. Catching on fire outright though, no.

@@Hunter12396 Tell that to the Finns.

@@Hunter12396 i would assume the fuel would seep in the cracks between the bolts and metal. that alone will turn the tank into a steaming hot mess causing the crew to bail out

​@@dragonace119 to be fair none of those tanks were post 1940

Its not a warcrime if you win.

Remember children: You can get away with a warcrime if the enemy commits the same warcrime

9 months late but there is

Will try to brighten video in future

It's the spiritual successor with the added mechanic of direct unit control

its call to arms which is a successor to men of war, and its a DLC for ww2 content. they're the same devs that made men of war assault squad 2

why are people this dumb

The Hague conventions of 1899 and 1907 disagree with you, as well as the whole concept of chivalry and honour. Rules of war have always existed, because all side benefit from following them. Total war is costly and expensive to engage in. Sure, if you target enemy hospitals and medical personnel you might gain an advantage, until the enemy responds in kind.

@@fede98k54 *Genghis Khan:* Lol, Lmao even

@@chasewilson3693 Even good old Genghis respected such rules, remember what happened to those who killed his emissaries?

@@fede98k54 bro, a "war crime" didn't exist yet. no one got put on trial for one before world war 1. there where guidelines, but they knew the person who follows them is at a disadvantage. so your mutual benefit theory falls apart immediately. wars in general have always been costly and chivalry was a way of life, not hard rules for war. they say war is hell because its just awful and anything goes. only after how horrible world war 1 was did we say, "maybe we should all agree that some of this stuff went too far." and BAM! war crimes became a thing.

i believe theres an overhaul mod to balance it out