Hypnotic Operations of $130 Million F-35 on US Navy Carrier at Sea

Рет қаралды 263,098

2 ай бұрын

Welcome back to the Fluctus Channel as we take a closer look at the role the fifth-generation F-35 stealth fighter plays in terms of naval and amphibious air power.
Fluctus is a website and KZfaq channel dedicated to sea geeks. Whenever you are curious or an incorrigible lover of this mysterious world, our videos are made for you !
We publish 3 videos a week on our KZfaq channel and many more articles on our website.
Feel free to subscribe to not miss any of our updates and visit our website to discover additional content.
Don’t forget to follow us on twitter:
/ fluctusofficial
Please keep the comments section respectful. Any spam, insults or troll will be deleted.
To contact us, make sure to use our email in the about section of this channel.

Пікірлер: 51

@garymiller5937 2 ай бұрын

Quite interesting and informative. Thanks for the wonderful video! 😊😊😊😊😊❤❤❤❤❤

@clarencehopkins7832 2 ай бұрын

Hell yeah, sign me up

@joshuajuarez3471 Ай бұрын

Such a beautiful plane!!

@brian13105 2 ай бұрын

The personal fitness levels in the U.S.N. seem to be dropping " 14:22 " .

@manuelgarofanocardenas5199 2 ай бұрын

Hello everyone from Spain!! The Spanish Navy is interested in this F-35B aircraft to replace the Harrier fighters it currently has. without a doubt a success if it is carried out.

@caspercat39 2 ай бұрын

The UK has approximately 30 aircraft & that includes RAF jets, not enough for one carrier that's why we always have to borrow some from the USA , not good enough

@jinkenz6459 2 ай бұрын

You're welcome. 👍🤗

@tylerdurden4006 Ай бұрын

Plus, neither of your "super" carriers are working anyways. 🤷

@johnshields6852 2 ай бұрын

The thrust vectoring is a brilliant piece of machinery, that's what sets them apart, both the F35 and F22, the design, the military personnel that make the USA military 2nd to None. 🇺🇸

@Then.72 2 ай бұрын

The technology was British & was invented by Rolls Royce with the flying bedstead which made the concept & design of the Bristol Siddeley Kestrel that became the Harrier jump jet, not the Ryan X-13

@Paul-Nicer58 Ай бұрын

*The USMC originally purchased 110 Harrier AV-8A aircraft from the UK back in the 1970s.* *_Those aircraft were built at Hawker Siddeley Kingston UK, Disassembled for transport to the US then reassembled by McDonnell Douglas._* _All USMC Harriers including the later USMC AV-8B manufactured by McDonnell Douglas always used the UK Bristol / RR Pegasus engine with vertical lift thrust vectoring system._ The F35-B has more than 30% UK content involving more than 130 UK companies. All non STOVL F35 aircraft have more than 15% UK content involving more than 130 UK companies. *The F-35B depends on a great deal of experience & expertise gained from the Hawker Siddeley Harrier.*

@user-uc2fv2bc5l 2 ай бұрын

🎉🎉🎉

@johng8826 2 ай бұрын

Bottom left at 2:40… what’s that next to the two Super Stallions?

@blvck.8197 2 ай бұрын

It's an f35 faced away from the camera

@derrellrose7020 2 ай бұрын

lift fan looks like it would cause a lot of drag on takeoff.

@Paul-Nicer58 Ай бұрын

The lift fan cannot be used above low speed. Max speed with the lift fan doors open is 200mph.

@rontribbey9038 2 ай бұрын

I really wish the Navy & Marines could go more jump jets then they have had in the past , but i don't know if they are as fast to scramble as the F18 types. Maybe someone can comment on this delta.

@TB-ni4ur Ай бұрын

It uses copious amounts of fuel and can't take off with a full payload, it has to "jump" with a minimal amount of fuel and payload to reduce weight. Bottom line there is no utility in a jump jet, only as a way to take off with a "minimized" runway length. But even then, it's not like it can take off form a dirt road, any rocks or debris could easily get stirred up by the air and destroy the skin basically immobilize the entire plane with is fragile. The Marines wished they has spent their money on a helicopter, and the JSF wished they had abandoned the vertical takeoff nonsense all together...

@salvadorceriaco6857 2 ай бұрын

F-35 & F-22 are 5th gen. Jets mostly advanced avionics , capabilities But also require expensive operational @ maintenance cost to W/c our country can not afford to Operate(only 2-3 times/day).Jas 39 gripen has same 5th gen. Avionics capabilities but lower operational/ maintenance cost w/c we can afford )6-7 x/day).

@mcouture8169 2 ай бұрын

Stealth F-22/35's are a completely different league of aircraft and any JAS-39 pilot would tell you such. The stealth capability is the primary identifier of "5th gen". Upgraded avionics/maneuverability are considered to be Gen 4+, not Gen 5. Once an area is secure, the JAS-39/Typhoon/other Gen 4 (Gen 4+) aircraft still fill a role, but certainly not the same one.

@NOM-X 2 ай бұрын

The things I could tell you what these platforms can do, but as JSOC Shhhhhhhhhh

@commander57 2 ай бұрын

The f35 is no more than a defense contractors ATM.

@user-qw2vi3qv8s Ай бұрын

강한척

@jeffreyrichardson 2 ай бұрын

ruth rogers sons stamp chief seen two ninetys on ramp sun sunapee camp

@QuietStormX 2 ай бұрын

Why always show the F35 C version that is most expensive and larger than the Air Force F-35A is smaller and cheaper and Marine version too

@JesseJames-kv7xc 2 ай бұрын

a 130 million dollar hair dryer

@ClubCommonSense 2 ай бұрын

4x the cost of an F18. Quite a premium for vertical takeoff and advanced weapon systems.

@user-on3vw1qz3x 2 ай бұрын

ได

@ricdale7813 2 ай бұрын

The F-35 is now running an optimal production assembly line that should be churning out many of these a month. In the next 5 years many NATO friendly Military's will be fielding these Wonder jets.

@netwrkguy 2 ай бұрын

The carrier put the ship into the wind so the jets get greater lift when taking off from either US or UK carriers!!

@vaughnbay 2 ай бұрын

And I thought the Phantom was ugly!

@ColonelJohnmatrix1000 2 ай бұрын

Like you

@vaughnbay 2 ай бұрын

@@ColonelJohnmatrix1000 Colonel I don't know if those are your Halo wings or not but either way there's nothing there that would indicate you drove the Phantom OR the Lightning.

@dundabird3203 2 ай бұрын

F-35 is an odd looking thing, like the dwarven brother of the F-22, but the F-4 Phantom is an absolute looker.

@mcouture8169 2 ай бұрын

I've heard F-35's affectionately referred to as "Ugly Betty" by a military pilot.

@markcooke5270 2 ай бұрын

Rollce Royce has created an engine for the F35b which was better in everyway......200 knots quicker with a 17% more powerful all-round performance engine oh with 9% increased range but America was cno way going to allow to be outdone ....British Engineers basically built it alongside the US so it's NOT a US JET

@ColonelJohnmatrix1000 2 ай бұрын

Utter BS

@dundabird3203 2 ай бұрын

It's a joint project, nobody has denied that, but there's no earthly way Lockheed would reject an engine capable of 200knots faster, that's an absolutely absurd claim.

@blvck.8197 2 ай бұрын

Not a US jet 😂😂😂 your funny kid

@ColonelJohnmatrix1000 2 ай бұрын

@@blvck.8197 stay off the meth

@-rp2pg 2 ай бұрын

@@ColonelJohnmatrix1000 The UK invented jet VTOL, later sold it to you but always made your engines so when Lockheed began with the B version of the F35 they had problems and came Knocking on the doors of Rolls Royce who invented thrust vectoring with the fly bedstead . A contract was signed and that aircraft is now 25% British as the engines are Rolls Royce and BAE systems also play a part, do some research and wake up

@s4160968 2 ай бұрын

so good we keep quiet every time it goes wrong but keep saying it is a super plane

@user-qs2zu3tj5q 2 ай бұрын

Always a hater online . Be happy your in the USA . God bless our servicemen and women to keep you and your family safe . Think about that !!

@s4160968 2 ай бұрын

@@user-qs2zu3tj5qyour the first to run when it gets hot

@ColonelJohnmatrix1000 2 ай бұрын

Ok wumao

@mcouture8169 2 ай бұрын

@@s4160968 That's interesting. Could you provide examples of other aircraft that pushed the limits of military capability, that didn't have issues at the beginning? It's a shame Russia and China are still trying to build their own versions of an F-22 equivalent 27 years after the U.S. did so. Maybe you cheer for losers?