Sigma 85mm f1.4 for Sony E Mount - vs GM vs Rokinon vs Zeiss vs Sony

No video

Sigma 85mm f1.4 for Sony E Mount - vs GM vs Rokinon vs Zeiss vs Sony

Рет қаралды 136,635

Күн бұрын

What's the best 85mm prime for Sony?
Sigma 85mm f/1.4 - bhpho.to/33BGeD9
Sony G Master 85mm f/1.4 - bhpho.to/2I4WeVR
Rokinon (Samyang) 85mm f/1.4 - bhpho.to/3nre8SI
Zeiss 85mm f/1.8 - bhpho.to/3lgWe3p
Sony 85mm f/1.8 - bhpho.to/2HWEgok

Пікірлер: 175

@geoffkeeton4311 3 жыл бұрын

I have the Zeiss 85 and 25. They are both very light. So sharp.

@billsaunders1 3 жыл бұрын

The eye auto focus on the Sigma is actually very quick and very consistent.

@michaelbell75 2 жыл бұрын

Pretty sure he's a Sony fanboy.

@stkuj 3 жыл бұрын

The Sony 85 1.8 was the first lens I got when I moved to Sony. It's the best lens for the value - performance is great, its light, it has the AF hold button, it is marketed as weather-resistant (if that matters), its got nice compression and bokeh. It still have it. I want to upgrade to the Sigma, but having a difficult time justifying the $$$.

@RonBilevich 3 жыл бұрын

totally agree!

@SperS-222 3 жыл бұрын

Like me ,,, first

@darrenhaken 2 жыл бұрын

Did you end up getting the Sigma in the end? I am torn if to sell my Sony 1.8 for the Sigma

@yanielacosta9079 2 жыл бұрын

@@darrenhaken what did you end up getting? I’m on the same boat. The Sony lenses have better AF and cheaper. The Sigma is better build quality.

@darrenhaken 2 жыл бұрын

@@yanielacosta9079 I ended up with the Sigma but I didn't think the image quality was vastly superior to the Sony 85mm 1.8. AF performance was similar - benchmarked with a moving toddler. I definitely think the build quality is higher and there's something I prefer about the bokeh under certain conditions. I'm going to say it's a 10-15% better lens..

@Jameshhl 2 жыл бұрын

I personally got the 85mm 1.8 because it's the smallest/lightest, I also have the sony 28mm and zeiss 55mm all smallest in lineup. Big heavy lenses like G Master, Sigma, Rokinon defeats the whole purpose of me switching from Canon to Sony mirrorless 6 years ago. When all these lenses perform within 90% of each other, really no point spending 2x-3x extra money and ending up with bigger heavier lenses.

@mohammedislam9381 2 жыл бұрын

If you like the flare during video, it saves you time from adding it in post. Its a cinematic feature that many videographers like. Its all subjective, there is no good or bad when it comes to lens. It really comes down to how you use it and what you use it for. Every brand has its users.

@gavsu 3 жыл бұрын

i learned that the Sony 85 1.8 is dope as great for video too... especially on all the broll videos

@MaximC 3 жыл бұрын

Like, just because of the sensible considerations, thoughts and way of reviewing. Never change.

@brightbd4914 3 жыл бұрын

Blown away by how you nailed what mattered. Subscribe.

@BIbiVstf3sx 3 жыл бұрын

nice review! however, i would have placed the zeiss 3rd because on stabe and full weather sealing, that rokinon and sony1.8 don t have.

@Just_Samson 3 жыл бұрын

This is my 10th or so video on 85’s on my search for a lens for one of my Sony’s and the first helpful one. Thanks for the very detailed review. Super helpful. 🤜🏼🤛🏼😉

@AR-vf7vg 3 жыл бұрын

"Discover" reviews by Dustin Abbott, and some other serious reviewers.

@CO8848_2 3 жыл бұрын

The only channel that picks the GM over sigma

@michaelbell75 2 жыл бұрын

Seriously. The Sigma destroys it. Even Manny Ortiz, who sleeps with the Sony 1.4 under his pillow, admits the Sigma is much better.

@artmaltman 2 жыл бұрын

@@michaelbell75 I agree with Hyun. Have shot all of these except the Sony f/1.8. The GM has the most beautiful rendering. If the slower AF and weak corners are not an issue it is the best IMHO. For still portraits the slower autofocus and soft corners are not an issue for me. However I often photograph moving children so its a little agonizing but the faster AF of the Sigma matters to me. I am settling on the Sigma until GM v2. I also own the Zeiss and the Samyang. The Samyang eye AF is less reliable IMHO and it has a slightly warm tint so I will sell it soon. If not for the other f/1.4 options I would keep it. Certainly for the money it is wonderful. The Zeiss was the first fast 85mm for this system and I was probably one of the first to buy it! I am tempted to use it when I don’t need f/1.4 because it is superb all round and does not have the severe distortion of the Sigma. Notice in the video that when close focusing and background far away then all the lenses have amazing bokeh. It is where there are transitions or background not so far away that bokeh quality matter.

@GunslingerMediaCo Жыл бұрын

I would pick the Sony over the sigma if the prices were the same. I generally prefer the Sony glass look over the Sigma Dg Dn look. It’s mostly lens coatings I suspect, but here it’s also the aperture blades as well. I do t own either but I’m Al thousands of photos I’ve looked over for both I prefer the look of the Sony, it seems to offer smoother and more buttery/dreamy photos, while the Sigma exemplifies the Dg Dn lens line up look of being clinically sterile, flat and sharp.

@CO8848_2 Жыл бұрын

@@GunslingerMediaCo doesn't even focus. LOL, go ahead, pay more for poor performance.

@GunslingerMediaCo Жыл бұрын

@@CO8848_2 you don’t read well, I said if same price. Which they are now used.

@CosminCraiova 3 жыл бұрын

Sigma for the win ! Now we just need some new 35 1.4 and 1.2 , 50 1.4 , 105 1.4 and 135 1.8 with half of weight and size, sharper and with better af than the old lenses :D

@ralphtime 3 жыл бұрын

Wheww if they can make my 105 lighter. I would jump on that

@dwmspace 3 жыл бұрын

Great comparison review. I do however think the Zeiss deserves a bit more credit, it’s subtle but I can tell it has that Zeiss pop. Also moreover, the optical stabilization is really an underrated feature. Helps with low light shutter speed and it’s really useful for handheld video. I own the Sony 85mm F1.8 but wish I saved up for the Zeiss. I think it’s worth the price difference.

@folksyfox5581 3 жыл бұрын

0pp0p9l

@jonnyelpoiss7 3 жыл бұрын

Couldnt agree more! Got the zeiss Batis 85mm 3 years ago, and got the best image with it! I can totally back that! This Pop straight out of the cam, only Zeiss has it. This is the reason why i’m keeping it, and wont move for the GM for those 3 specific prime: zeiss Sony 35mm 1.4, zeiss 50mm 1.4 and this one. I dont give a flying f*ck about the aperture ring and the perfect round ball in the bokeh. Yes I Got the GM for the 135, the 14 and the zoom as well, but for those 3 prime, i’ll keep them forever for this specific reason, that feel can’t be found on another brand!

@thienlo 2 жыл бұрын

So true. I own Sigma and Zeiss. I'm very pleased with the Zeiss pop. I don't mind it less sharp.

@Eihei 3 жыл бұрын

Samyang(Rokinon) is by far the best bang for buck option. No competition really, especially for photos.

@fireboltacic99 3 жыл бұрын

It sure seems like it, I will say, I quite disliked the images coming out of it compared to some of my other (nicer) glass.

@Eihei 3 жыл бұрын

@@fireboltacic99 that's okay, it's up to personal preference pretty much. For example I absolutely love the warm colors of Samyangs, half of my glass is from Samyang ;)

@GaryBonar 3 жыл бұрын

I sent the Samyang back after a day, hardly got any shots in focus at a wedding I done. I had the bigger sigma as back up as I only got the Samyang on the morning of the wedding. Just ordered this new Sigma as it’s the weight I’m loving. Art lenses are all amazing.

@rickbiessman6084 Жыл бұрын

Thanks so much for this super thorough comparison! That was incredibly helpful. I came away thinking that the GM really is the nicest of them all, while the Sony 1.8 is just really solid and I value the compact size. Also I happen to know from personal experience that it survives a drop onto a rock... reliabilty can be super important and it’s great to have a lens you can trust to hold up.

3 жыл бұрын

Great review, very thorough! Thanks! I think I’ll go with the Sony 1.8... I don’t do many portraits so I don’t need a super specialized lens, and I would rather save some $$ but have anyway a great overall lens.

@JasonNalley Жыл бұрын

It is really strange how you can get such different results from other reviewers... You're the first person in these lens shootouts I've watched that rates the GMaster over the Sigma...

@HyunRalphJeong Жыл бұрын

You really can't go wrong with either one, but the GM definitely has less distortion and better bokeh. Most may not think that's worth the price difference.

@slavo3436 3 жыл бұрын

Art 85mm DN and Batis 85mm have best micro contrast but Batis have olso unique colour rendering, you don't have to like it but facts are facts...

@dedelabinouze5110 Жыл бұрын

You failed to mention that the Zeiss has OSS, which is great for non-IBIS APS-Cs

@hari_fyi Ай бұрын

For telephoto Ibis doesn't help much where the zeiss helps by OSS plus it has 3d pop

@ralphtime 3 жыл бұрын

I sold my Gm for the sigma. It’s way better n my opinion and lighter.

@safiullahtheriot3767 3 жыл бұрын

Why?

@ramik8451 3 жыл бұрын

focus is amazing, sharpness is the best, price is cheaper, and wight is lighter.

@Leo-hwru 3 жыл бұрын

Just waiting for the RF Sigma 85m f 1.4 lens

@HyunRalphJeong 3 жыл бұрын

Hopefully it's coming soon

@CosminCraiova 3 жыл бұрын

We need all Sigma old lenses replaced with new versions for mirrorless like this one. Also those Tamrons 2.8 zooms would be AWSOME for mirrirless Canon and Nikon. Over 50% for the reason I'm buying Sony this black friday is those lenses.

@JimmyHuynhdesign 3 жыл бұрын

Always great video. I got the Sony 85 1.8 for half the price.

@xXKINGZ25Xx 3 жыл бұрын

awesome! how if I may ask?

@JimmyHuynhdesign 3 жыл бұрын

@@xXKINGZ25Xx Sorry, meant half the price compared to the 1.8 Zeiss.

@maurosegurah 5 ай бұрын

That is one of the best reviews I’ve seen, thank you

@RensKapoor 3 жыл бұрын

I'm so confused between Samyang 85 1.4 and Sony 85 1.8. for a7iii Is the difference between the two massive? I prefer going with native sony glass but then f1.4... at this price is just unbeatable... Can you suggest the best option? Please

@8080408729a 3 жыл бұрын

Sony all the way...elce save some more & go for sigma 85mm f1.4

@RensKapoor 3 жыл бұрын

@@8080408729a thank you 😇😇😇

@darrenhaken 2 жыл бұрын

@@8080408729a Do you think the Sigma is worth the extra money over the Sony 85mm 1.8? Twice the price roughly for me.

@STAMAS1991 Жыл бұрын

@@darrenhaken It does. Sigma will stay in your collection til it is not damaged.

@DARRENDDMPSTUDIOS 3 жыл бұрын

rokinon for the budgetary win

@ChrisLeeX 3 жыл бұрын

Fantastic review. Concise script and excellent side by side shots.

@roccellarocks 3 жыл бұрын

Really appreciate the analysis you did. I was looking for such a comparison and I found yours. Soon, I’ll buy a Sony A7C with Samyang 35mm F2.8, but now I know that I’ll pair that with Sony 85mm F1.8 - cause sometimes 35mm just isn’t enough to capture the scene - and I am happy to know I’ll have a nice starter kit. Hope you’ll publish more videos like this one. Thanks!

@gregorybeale 3 жыл бұрын

Samyang just came out with a 35 mm 1.8! They also have a 18 mm 2.8, 45 and 75 mm 1.8. All are less than $450 so I would look into those. Enjoy your new Sony A7c. I'm thinking A73 or Fuji xt4 soon. Take care! I want to shoot some sports so the A7C is too small for big zooms.

@pianoman1973 3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the great review - I currently own the Rokinon 85 1.4 but I'm not impressed by it's sharpness at f1.4 - if an aperture of f1.4 is important for me - would you recommend purchasing the Sigma ?

@mahakalax108 4 ай бұрын

Great comparsion especially close range of focus !!! thx for that :)

@havingfunwithpurpose9993 3 жыл бұрын

Fantastic review, and it was tremendously helpful for what I needed to help me determine the best lens for me. Well done, and thank you.

@michalbencur 3 жыл бұрын

Best 85 for Sony review on internet. Thanks for your work on this.

@patrickwu8415 3 жыл бұрын

Superb review! I like how you keep it simple and straight to the point! Please make another RF 85 version of this, RF 85 f2, RF 85 f1.2, RF 28-70 f2, and possibly sigma version of RF f1.4

@Moni-qd9no 3 жыл бұрын

I really wish, you would do a similar comparision with RF Samyang 85, RF 85 2.0, and why not an adapted Sigma

@yudaniel2001 3 жыл бұрын

Love your reviews man

@cheongmj 3 жыл бұрын

11:58 That's what she said.

@bcdjrise 3 жыл бұрын

Great test for helping out with the proper choice vs budget 👍 Thank you for your knowledge and time!

@RockyMaiviaMiami 3 жыл бұрын

Man I was just looking for this !

@FreeLensImage Жыл бұрын

Very good comparison. Samyang was my favourite to choose for a long time but last time it lost in My eyes. And even 1.4 i dont if is helpibg it ... Keep the good job :)

@dailan.0589 Жыл бұрын

great honest review, now i know which lens im going to buy, thanks for the review

@HyunRalphJeong Жыл бұрын

Glad I could help

@stevenkontsevenko 3 жыл бұрын

Great video. Soooooo informative. Could you do a video with Sony 50mm 1.8, Zeiss 55mm 1.8, Zeiss 50mm 1.4, Sigma 50 1.4. And could you add video auto focus comparisons to it. Thank you 🙏

@mrwashur1991 3 жыл бұрын

All I can say is I own the 55mm 1.8 and it’s a great lens. Amazing quality. I would go with the sigma second, then Sony 1.8 then the other zeiss I cannot speak of. I believe it’s a planar and I own the 50mm 1.4 planar for Nikon (manual lens) and it’s a beautiful lens (given they use the same lens formula) it’s got a lot of limitations wide open (is tack sharp and little CA at a certain distances and at other distances it’s the worst looking lens that just looks not good, also swirly bokeh at times which is awesome looking) but stopped down it’s a crazy good lens with a lot of character, sharpness and resolution. The 55mm is another beautiful lens with great micro contrast and really good AF. It’s not insanely sharp at 1.8 but it’s still sharp. I don’t notice any CA in that lens. I also know the sigma is a great lens as pretty much all their lenses are crushing the photography market right now. From what I can tell is the Sony 50 is a really good budget option and is basically a cheaper 55mm but not quite as good but still a good lens. You can’t really go wrong with either of those (I’m not sure on the zeiss 1.4 AF though) if it’s the same planar formula then it’s a great lens optically except it’s limited at 1.4.

@stevenkontsevenko 3 жыл бұрын

@@mrwashur1991 thank you very much I appreciate the response. It gives a lot of insight 🙏

@OMARZAKIALIRAQEY 2 жыл бұрын

thx

@charlesdavis6371 3 жыл бұрын

well covered. I expected to favor the Zeiss, but in the end I think I'll go with the Sony. (or just stick with my Nikon gear)

@matrixate Жыл бұрын

Yup...the pincushion distortion is a huge dealbreaker for me. You're one of the few YT reviewers that chooses the GM over the Sigma. One this you skipped was the chromatic aberration. Its pretty bad in the GM. I shoot video mostly and that distortion is not going to work because Resolve has no legs profile for the Sigma.

@artmaltman 3 жыл бұрын

Superb review, important topic, well thought out. I love how concise and how you highlight the important issues rapidly. Thank you. FYI, I own the Batis b/c it was the first and only 85mm for quite a while. I am keeping it for studio work where background blur at f/1.4 is rarely desired. I like the colors and pop. Beautiful images. Fast autofocus. Light weight. Little distortion. I also bought the Samyang months ago for that creamy f/1.4 outdoors. Gorgeous. I do find though that it has a slight yellow tint (easy to correct) and like you I find the autofocus not always as reliable. Now I have also the new Sigma which will replace the Samyang for my outdoors work. No yellow tint and more reliable autofocus. Also the sharpness is just a beautiful rendering. The GM is tempting though for that slightly creamier blur. GM gets discounted to $1600 periodically. Why keep the Batis? Why not use the Sigma in studio as well? We shall see. The distortion correction might be an issue since in studio I tether to Capture One, then edit in Photoshop. How to correct the distortion?

@HyunRalphJeong 3 жыл бұрын

Thanks, unfortunately I'm not all that familiar with Capture One but in Lightroom or Camera Raw, simple -10 or -11 correction seems to get rid of it.

@amustsuccess Жыл бұрын

@@HyunRalphJeong Nice apps.

@JJ-ty7rl 3 жыл бұрын

You didn’t say which aperture the Sigma was sharpest at...?

@DamirSpanic Жыл бұрын

The best review on the internet.

@trezegol2007 7 ай бұрын

Well, even in 2023-2024 this clip can be relevant! :)) I had flirted quite some times with the 85mm focal range in the past years but ended up not buying a lens because in the end it was not my primary range I was shooting in. But I had an irrefutable offer during the black friday week for the 1.8 Sony which I acquired. I must say the last years while not having still that lens, gave me plenty of opportunities to make up my mind of the pros and cons of all the competitor lenses. And indeed, I must agree that like in this video the Sony 1.8 can be considered the best "bargain" if you take the ratio price/pictures quality.

@mauriciojcYT 24 күн бұрын

In what price did you get it?

@trezegol2007 23 күн бұрын

@@mauriciojcYT I bought it for about 400 Euro

@mrmarzo 3 жыл бұрын

Has Adobe or specifically in Lightroom updated the lens vignetting support for RAW files?

@ac4pres310 2 жыл бұрын

Thank you, this video was what I needed! 😁

@Pharesm 3 жыл бұрын

Thanks, that was nice and thorough. And with all the right disclaimers, that preferences are subjective...

@sunilchitolie6771 3 жыл бұрын

What about the Image Stabilization that Zeiss offers?

@JohannBauermeister 3 жыл бұрын

Almost all modern lenses are sharp enough. One has to look at more subtle characteristics that a superficial test won’t reveal- the quality of the glass and how it reproduces colors, the aberrations, both spherical and lateral, the contrast and micro contrast, the build quality and long term performance against use and the elements.

@TwerpXNation 3 жыл бұрын

Which 85mm would you recommend?

@michaelbell75 2 жыл бұрын

@@TwerpXNation The Sigma, and its not even close.

@Thexderify 3 жыл бұрын

Subscribed. Great review. Shame that you didn't compare the older sigma.

@alhOOO2O 3 жыл бұрын

Really good comparison, thanks!

@simonahhim4825 3 жыл бұрын

Exactly the video I was looking for. Great Job man!

@shootermcgavin4999 2 жыл бұрын

If you are smart, you buy a lightly used lens vs new. When doing your reviews....you should also rank them by the current used average price....For example....on the used market the G master and the Sigma 85 are about the same price right now.

@STAMAS1991 Жыл бұрын

It depends, where...

@shootermcgavin4999 Жыл бұрын

@@STAMAS1991 Fredmiranda Buy Sell Forum.

@CryoftheProphet 3 жыл бұрын

If you arent going to shell out and go all out for the GM, I would only go for the FE1.8 sony, its an absolute beast of a lens..

@BONLEV 3 жыл бұрын

but all of the lenses don't have image stabilization? I have the sony 50mm F1.8 OSS for my crop sensor (A6000) and was looking to replace it with some of these lenses for my fullframe sony A7

@akram.ibrahim Жыл бұрын

Thank you, Great review!

@mrDoctorWho0 3 жыл бұрын

If you could test real light transmission (T-Stop) of those lens that would've been amazing.

@DjimmyTrovy 3 жыл бұрын

What a great review man. Thanks. It seem to me that you can't go wrong with any of these lenses.

@18yearsoldnot 2 жыл бұрын

for me, zeiss wins with the light build, ibis and flattering skin tones

@tudorbartas 2 жыл бұрын

Excellent review. Thank you.

@RyUnfocused 3 жыл бұрын

No Viltrox 85mm in the comparison?

@JimmyHuynhdesign 3 жыл бұрын

Did you even watch the beginning video? lol

@fatherheer 3 жыл бұрын

Do you know if Rokinon had the firmware updated?

@franklinpark4475 7 ай бұрын

Awesome video!!!

@rocheuro 3 жыл бұрын

Sammy in the corners ? ! so sharp

@hautcouture2928 3 жыл бұрын

Thank you for the great video!

@stefan_becker 3 жыл бұрын

Great review! However I made my own tests and can definitively say (also confirmed by other reviewers) that a "normal copy" of the Sony 85mm 1.4 GM is less sharp in the middle of the frame, but in the corners sharper than the Sigma. If you came to a different conclusion something might have gone wrong with one of your tests.

@HyunRalphJeong 3 жыл бұрын

Hi, isn’t that what I said in the video?

@stefan_becker 3 жыл бұрын

@@HyunRalphJeong 9:34

@HyunRalphJeong 3 жыл бұрын

@@stefan_becker I didn’t say it was better or worse than the Sigma but I think it was better than the “bad corners of the Sigma.

@AR-vf7vg 3 жыл бұрын

Must have been a (seldom) bad copy of DN Sigma. Strange this film does mot even mention that possibility (Related infos of that kind: @ Roger from Lensrental. Serious comparisons : Elswhere).

@romzetto Жыл бұрын

Great review. Thanks

@gametubenepal1396 2 жыл бұрын

Hii, is it worthy to buy used 85mm 1.4 DG HSM lens for 555$ usd? Please reply

@alphaandomega2709 3 жыл бұрын

Should do some Canon lenses like RF or EF adapted to RF 👍🏻

@Michael_Robinson Жыл бұрын

Great review!

@LopesjiN Жыл бұрын

Para mim qualquer uma serve, mas aqui no Brasil fica difícil para quem quer uma lente dessas de tão caro que são. Na gringa você quer uma lente você vai lá e compra, aqui no meu país você tem que economizar durante meses, até mesmo anos para ter uma dessas ai hahaha

@elysiumcore 2 жыл бұрын

My next lens 👀

@jocadesa 2 жыл бұрын

I think you got a bad unit of the Rokinon. The images you posted here are really bad compared with what I get from that lens.

@ammaralnaboulsi3847 3 жыл бұрын

solid review!

@stanleeger4711 3 жыл бұрын

The Rokinon 85mm is excellent for me.

@kvicalam 3 жыл бұрын

Perfect review. I like your channel...

@LostFart Жыл бұрын

Very nice video, thank you :)

@petkoatanasov2165 3 жыл бұрын

everything else?where is tokina 85?

@joshuadilliosa2227 3 жыл бұрын

I'm a dreaming to be a photographer 😊😊😊😊

@MrDixa987 3 жыл бұрын

Good video as always, will you make a video about the sony a7C? thanks!

@HyunRalphJeong 3 жыл бұрын

Thanks, I'll get my hands on one when it starts shipping in a few weeks.

@buleulek5153 3 жыл бұрын

Nothing special in that price !

@pickcick1580 3 жыл бұрын

Nice review... Keep it up...!

@photographerjonathan 3 жыл бұрын

The new Canon 85 f1.2 L is really expensive and huge and heavy, but how does it compare to the GM ?

@CheensCreationsUK 3 жыл бұрын

Great upload. Tfs.

@yohannsphotographyvideogra9542 3 жыл бұрын

i use it all the time .and i can say its the best 85mm i ever owned ...

@MonicaHolly143 3 жыл бұрын

The sony 1.8 is already good i dont think the performance is not worth 500

@jasonnowwhat5041 3 жыл бұрын

Video autofocus?

@sergeicherkes 3 жыл бұрын

Thx

@reedmelicher8658 2 жыл бұрын

Bring back bokeh hexigons. Am I the only one who likes these?

@HartmannTennis Жыл бұрын

Yo all of these are way to expensive! These would all cost more than my camera, the sony zve10, except for the rokinon though…. Rest of yall like the rokinon at all?

@DJILLEE 3 жыл бұрын

Seems like most reviews skip right over video af performance. I wish it was compared a bit more but otherwise a fantastic review.

@AR-vf7vg 3 жыл бұрын

"Discover" reviews by Dustin Abbott, and some other serious reviewers.

@KC-wt4fz 2 жыл бұрын

@11:58 oh yeahhh

@maddenfan6683 3 жыл бұрын

Which one was best in video AF with eye tracking and speed? sony 1.8?

@HyunRalphJeong 3 жыл бұрын

I think so

@m.w.1546 3 жыл бұрын

Good job Bro. 👏👍

@Sairo9 2 жыл бұрын

11:58 That's what she said

@g5magic Жыл бұрын

Zeiss should be $999.99 for this performance.

@jeremiahdagcutan7759 3 жыл бұрын

i was eyeing for the sigma 85art but the distortion turns me off. ill just stick with my sony 85mm 1.8. hopefully they'll release a 24mm f2/1.8 thats not a gmaster.