I Can't Believe This Flies

  Рет қаралды 2,661,488

Ziroth

Ziroth

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 3 400
@ZirothTech
@ZirothTech 11 ай бұрын
Check out their website for more details! www.cyclotech.at/
@frostfamily5321
@frostfamily5321 10 ай бұрын
Does it have a patent?
@desmo750f1
@desmo750f1 9 ай бұрын
@@frostfamily5321 that would be hard as the technology is the same as Voith-Schneider drives used on ships, and they say as much. There could be other patentable elements, maybe the control system, but the thrusters are old tech re-purposed.
@princesssolace4337
@princesssolace4337 8 ай бұрын
back in 1903 .... if it ain't broke, just leave it alone. Just another money laundering scam
@baconghoti
@baconghoti 8 ай бұрын
​@@frostfamily5321no, because it's century old concept. The creator is a hypetard.
@TexanWolverine
@TexanWolverine 8 ай бұрын
Patent? This was a kite when i was kid... use to buy them in Galveston, TX on the beach. Made out of styrofoam. Pretty sweet kite.. easy to build
@GJ203
@GJ203 10 ай бұрын
"Too last century" just because something is old doesn't mean it's bad.
@markhathaway9456
@markhathaway9456 9 ай бұрын
I tell my friends that, but they just say, "Wake up hold man. You're dreaming." /s
@wesleyashley99
@wesleyashley99 9 ай бұрын
Yeah physics doesn't follow fads. Once an optimal design is found any changes just make it less than optimal. If a change makes it work better then it was not quite optimal in the first place.
@amosbackstrom5366
@amosbackstrom5366 9 ай бұрын
Dont worry they had paddle boats and waterwheels 100 years before the first planes and that's all this is😂
@jamesh7876
@jamesh7876 9 ай бұрын
Last I checked we haven’t reinvented the wheel yet.
@quartusbuys6831
@quartusbuys6831 9 ай бұрын
The wheel is also last century or older. Let's reinvent it.
@Galbex21
@Galbex21 9 ай бұрын
"Eating food is too last several billions of years"
@name5293
@name5293 8 ай бұрын
Lol, got to love logic.
@vickiehadd4324
@vickiehadd4324 8 ай бұрын
Oh but they think they DID improve on the human body though. They cut off male parts and make them LOOK like females now trying to make it so they can have babies. NOT GONNA WORK
@RM_VFX
@RM_VFX 8 ай бұрын
Zoomer logic 👍
@hederlyp
@hederlyp 8 ай бұрын
@@name5293😂😂😂😂
@jeanlawson9133
@jeanlawson9133 8 ай бұрын
AIN'T IT JUST AIN'T IT 😜 lols
@joshDammmit
@joshDammmit 4 ай бұрын
"blades are old fashioned, so THESE blades..."
@Rumpelstielschen
@Rumpelstielschen 3 ай бұрын
That's true. I recognize this drive. Is it not the case with tugboat boats in ports?
@BugattiRacing1
@BugattiRacing1 3 ай бұрын
I'd like to fatten those new blades up
@mysty0
@mysty0 3 ай бұрын
Yea, like wheels are old fashioned. We need to stop using circles so no more cogs and sprockets
@steviefpv
@steviefpv Ай бұрын
lol still uses blades 🤦🏼‍♂️
@marcomangiola9403
@marcomangiola9403 5 ай бұрын
I’m an aerospace engineer, fun fact: Turbines create thrust not lift. A wing’s curved shape creates lift as it moves through the air. Propeller blades have a similar shape for the same reason. Blades in a jet turbine also have the same shape, but they don’t use this to create lift or thrust. Instead, several layers of blades suck in and compress air, which is directed to the combustion chamber and nozzle.
@Edmundajw
@Edmundajw 4 ай бұрын
I would argue that the blades are used to create thrust. The compression stage is a necessary part of the thrust making process. The thrust is of course a way to describe the mass flow rate out of the engine - but this is the result of combustion, caused by compressed air and fuel, caused by the compression stage, caused by the blades.
@DQuanAlSamirOHoulihan
@DQuanAlSamirOHoulihan 4 ай бұрын
I love seeing Bots argue.
@Apfellll
@Apfellll 4 ай бұрын
Fun fact: turbines generate power, not thrust or lift
@Clayne151
@Clayne151 3 ай бұрын
Fun fact, thrust that is directed downwards is lift. Like, as in every quadcopter and this thing.
@raghavendraporwal2569
@raghavendraporwal2569 3 ай бұрын
Fun fact:- Pluto is not a planet
@df18001
@df18001 11 ай бұрын
This is just a cyclogyro (first patented in 1927). Works like a Voith Schneider propeller.
@lionelsquires7662
@lionelsquires7662 9 ай бұрын
Spot on!!!
@PattyLustig
@PattyLustig 9 ай бұрын
Which was used in tug boats to make it move in all directions
@Fightre_Flighte
@Fightre_Flighte 9 ай бұрын
Oh, man. Screw this design, it's too last century for me!
@autisticreatard7848
@autisticreatard7848 9 ай бұрын
E. P. Sverchkov made the first cyclocopter in 1909 they are more efficient than a helicopter though
@josephsagotti8786
@josephsagotti8786 9 ай бұрын
Patented. So thata why we dont see these things that often.
@wildhogOW
@wildhogOW 8 ай бұрын
"Rotors are too last century, so this company invented a flying machine using a 94-year old rotor design"
@pfarraldcash6095
@pfarraldcash6095 8 ай бұрын
Why have a modern boat when you can drive a Mississippi paddle steamer? 😂
@advorak8529
@advorak8529 8 ай бұрын
⁠​⁠​⁠@@pfarraldcash6095 Exactly! Steam technology and paddle wheels are cool and good looking. They are not efficient, low maintenance or easy to handle properly and very dangerous if mishandled in just the right way. See April 27, 1865, the Sultana, a Mississippi river side paddle steamer. Actually, much steam equipment has become more dangerous now than 50-100 years ago, as the number of people with proper training and understanding has dropped with it no longer being in wide use - not including steam turbine electrical power generation, large steam-powered ships, or any nuclear-powered steam generation, of course.
@martinda7446
@martinda7446 8 ай бұрын
And just to avoid misunderstanding, a 94 year old flying machine.
@rob-123
@rob-123 8 ай бұрын
Early windmills from middle east were built this way as it was easier to change the angle of the blade for speed adjustment back in those times, so you can't really say it's a modern design to be honest.
@U-should-big-country-yourself
@U-should-big-country-yourself 7 ай бұрын
Fr
@noahway13
@noahway13 4 ай бұрын
It looks like the flying car we have all been anticipating.
@raico6890
@raico6890 2 ай бұрын
glad to see the people in the comments are not taking this bullshit. Next level of not taking this bullshit is to stop consuming and interacting in these videos, don't go down your level people.
@baconghoti
@baconghoti 8 ай бұрын
Those rotors are just a few years shy of their 100th birthday. This is as new and revolutionary as a vacuum train.
@dav356
@dav356 8 ай бұрын
Dumbass statement. That's like saying modern calculators were invented when the abacus came around.
@dollarbutt
@dollarbutt 8 ай бұрын
For real. Fuckin sick of people discovering something they didn't know about and saying it a new tech. Fun fact: that video from "2021" is from 2017 lol
@stueymorris
@stueymorris 8 ай бұрын
Some Indian guy flew before the Wright brothers, a few years before, not sure why this isn't common knowledge
@jesusramirezromo2037
@jesusramirezromo2037 8 ай бұрын
​@@stueymorrisAlot of pepole did, What the Wright Brothers did was more so the most practical way to fly
@clydecraft5642
@clydecraft5642 8 ай бұрын
@@dollarbuttthese new drum rotors can instantly change thrust into any axis so yes they are slightly revolutionary
@Ralinos
@Ralinos 11 ай бұрын
😂 they made a paddlewheel for the air
@blingbus6197
@blingbus6197 10 ай бұрын
Nah air wheels
@zbossgamer3400
@zbossgamer3400 9 ай бұрын
Feels more like a propeller on its side. Since its not paddles pushing air, but wings creating lift in directions directions.
@rikospostmodernlife
@rikospostmodernlife 9 ай бұрын
​@@zbossgamer3400seems like a simplified, non-bionic ornithopter (entomopter?) wing: still using the most basic principle without trying to copy the complex anatomy and movement of the natural thing
@AtomicHermit
@AtomicHermit 9 ай бұрын
A cyclorotor is able to produce variable thrust in any direction. See the Voith Schneider marine cyclorotor for historic examples.
@JH-zo5gk
@JH-zo5gk 9 ай бұрын
Not really. A paddle wheel produces thrust by push against the water. This is making lift using venturi principle expanded with Bernoulli's theorem. It's closer to a helicopter that spin the rotor along the x axis and not the z axis.
@bmx51nx2
@bmx51nx2 4 ай бұрын
Imagine sitting in traffic turning on that feature and hovering over everyone
@BarrieStewart-pi4go
@BarrieStewart-pi4go 3 ай бұрын
In the 70's, I had a "rotor blade", polystyrene plane. Awesome. 😊
@wisdomfox857
@wisdomfox857 3 ай бұрын
But it's nothing new
@faraanhadi
@faraanhadi 11 ай бұрын
Jet engines dont create lift. They provide thrust so that the wings with sufficient airspeed create lift Edit: Ladies and Gentlemen I thought it need not be said that this was a generalized statement as in general and civil aviation the primary lift generating component at cruise the wings generate the lift. Of course the thrust generating component has a force in the direction it is pointing, so if you direct your thrust downwards yes tour thrust will be producing more upwards force on the craft. This generalization is very common form of abstraction to simplify the model. Of course all models are wrong but some models are useful. It is general8zed at cruise in general and civil aviation where AOA is very small the thrust component is not producing much lift so the wings are the main lift generating component, so the statement engines don't create lift, the wings do that with airspeed is not entirely correct, it is also not flat wrong. Like how staing electricity takes the path of least resistance is wrong as electricity takes everypath with current proportionate to the inverse of resistance in said path; but that makes modeling complicated so we say electricity takes the path of least resistance, it is not entirely correct it is also not wrong.
@faraanhadi
@faraanhadi 10 ай бұрын
@@YuFow that's a special case
@YuFow
@YuFow 10 ай бұрын
@@faraanhadi yeah just thought it was worth pointing out
@lukasvavrinec5380
@lukasvavrinec5380 10 ай бұрын
​@@YuFowit still is thrust, you just orient it in other direction. Lift is force created by solid body moving through fuild.
@YuFow
@YuFow 10 ай бұрын
@@lukasvavrinec5380 yeah you are correct to be fair, that said if you had a jet engine moving through the air at a high enough angle of attack, the engine body would create some lift 😂😂
@lukasvavrinec5380
@lukasvavrinec5380 10 ай бұрын
@@YuFow yes you are correct, if you are at high enough aoa and are going at certain speed you can generate enough lift even with flat plate to make airplane flying, but it is not practical. Neither F-35 or Harrier is using engine in such a way that it generates lift.
@paulheitkemper1559
@paulheitkemper1559 9 ай бұрын
This is a less efficient design than regular rotors.
@Jack_Torrance.
@Jack_Torrance. 9 ай бұрын
It seems extremely inefficient. Four rotors verses one main rotor and a tail rotor, and lots of drag, is another negative. It failed in the early 20th century. It is still a fun project. But, that is all it is going to be, using this technique. The Magnus effect aeroplane was similar also. It failed as well.
@chrism3743
@chrism3743 8 ай бұрын
You're the expert... 👀
@leonhardmollney8638
@leonhardmollney8638 8 ай бұрын
Jea it has waay to many mooving parts
@jd-xj3ew
@jd-xj3ew 8 ай бұрын
Yes, but it's new and shiny! 😂
@BetterCallThall
@BetterCallThall 8 ай бұрын
Doesn't mean it can't serve a purpose 🤷🏻‍♀️
@Mericangunna
@Mericangunna 6 ай бұрын
Literally the first rendition of the first logically engineered flying car
@davefarmery8180
@davefarmery8180 4 ай бұрын
The wheel is fuckin ancient but still going strong
@demeter-the-great
@demeter-the-great 8 ай бұрын
Wheels are just too last millenium, let’s reinvent them
@SumitRana-life314
@SumitRana-life314 6 ай бұрын
I mean we have been
@Rocksidion
@Rocksidion 6 ай бұрын
We should build a giant tunnel and stick a hovering train in it. We'll call it.. Pyperhoop.
@newhorizons2409
@newhorizons2409 6 ай бұрын
Let's try triangular wheels this time
@Em22-wtf
@Em22-wtf 6 ай бұрын
Ya, I'm just so over electricity & running water too! Pffft so old already! 😂 🙄
@notevan7894
@notevan7894 4 ай бұрын
square wheels should be way more effective if we make them a little rounder...
@Charlies_Factory
@Charlies_Factory 8 ай бұрын
I love how quick the internet is to call out the BS these idiotic youtube short creators are
@JakeHawken
@JakeHawken 8 ай бұрын
warms my heart
@joeshumo9457
@joeshumo9457 8 ай бұрын
It’s getting better, slowly, that’s for sure. There’s even less TDS sufferers these days.
@twitchell2682
@twitchell2682 7 ай бұрын
But we should comment at all and yet I'm here too. It's evil. I try to just dislike and move on. I can't even say this is particularly horrible. It is, but at least it tried to have a point.
@twitchell2682
@twitchell2682 7 ай бұрын
+shouldn't
@dearboy05
@dearboy05 7 ай бұрын
You may be a tad sadistic.
@rayo1883
@rayo1883 6 ай бұрын
These personal flying vehicle videos never let you hear the actual sound.
@SirrCommander
@SirrCommander 4 ай бұрын
Mama always said , if it ain’t broke don’t fix it.
@MrTravel4nutin
@MrTravel4nutin 8 ай бұрын
Keep in mind wings still work when engines fail.
@internal_voice
@internal_voice 8 ай бұрын
Helicopter's autorotation?
@MrTravel4nutin
@MrTravel4nutin 8 ай бұрын
@@internal_voice Which is still dependent on more moving parts.
@robbylebotha
@robbylebotha 8 ай бұрын
For a paper plane, yes. I'd your point was solid, running out of fuel wouldn't be much concern, but it is. So your point is watery at best and cannot be used as a counter in this scenario or application. This is to "replace cars" and I don't see wings and a jet engine being ideal for that. Even if you insist, at an appropriate size to fit 2- 4 humans and still park in a house or maneuver in a city, wings wouldn't work to keep it in flying. It would drop to earth immediately. Context.
@MrTravel4nutin
@MrTravel4nutin 8 ай бұрын
@@robbylebotha Who mentioned running out of fuel. Running out of fuel as not a real issue beyond pilot error. Engine failure however is an issue. Also most of these localized commutes are going to be done by autonomous vehicle strategies from companies like Wisk. Also these designs fly on fly by wire concepts that do not allow for mechanical back up so the computer system becomes the single point of failure.
@JayGee6996
@JayGee6996 8 ай бұрын
@@MrTravel4nutinyes but they auto-rotate as the helicopter falls out of the sky meaning you can still actually land
@JamesSchulte
@JamesSchulte 8 ай бұрын
The wheel is several thousand years old and yet it's still everywhere
@tdcfc
@tdcfc 3 ай бұрын
Probably means it's a good design that doesn't need much improvement. Even so, tanks don't use them because they're not ideal. Things evolve. Grow up.
@JamesSchulte
@JamesSchulte 3 ай бұрын
@@tdcfc You didn't understand what i said did you
@yongli8276
@yongli8276 3 ай бұрын
⁠@@tdcfc Tanks also have wheels…
@tron.44
@tron.44 6 ай бұрын
It's on cables and is being lifted by those cables. It's also based on an old design concept.
@SlickArmor
@SlickArmor 6 ай бұрын
Uhh, look closer, there is slack in the cable.
@AngusMcIntyre
@AngusMcIntyre 3 ай бұрын
Helicopters have been working exactly the same way for decades
@weekndatbirdys8217
@weekndatbirdys8217 8 ай бұрын
If “you read only one article and think it told you everything” was a person
@JenkemSuperfan
@JenkemSuperfan 8 ай бұрын
Propellers are not "too old school," they are by far the better choice for low speed propulsion, particularly when takeoff distance is a concern. That is why they continue to be used in craft like the c-130. The wheel, a cornerstone of modern life, is millenia old.
@cedrienenglish6344
@cedrienenglish6344 6 ай бұрын
Yeah it’s definitely time to move on from the wheel 😂
@ParadoxISPower
@ParadoxISPower 4 ай бұрын
Nobody tell them this "New" propeller was invented before the "Old school" one rofl, mainstream plebeians are so uniformed that stupid is far to kind.
@MarcillaSmith
@MarcillaSmith 4 ай бұрын
"a wheel is older than a wall" --President Trump
@wisdomfox857
@wisdomfox857 3 ай бұрын
Plus propellers way more effective and takes less energy to take off or fly
@user-uc6nu2mj1g
@user-uc6nu2mj1g 2 ай бұрын
this actually could pretty easily become a flying car without many transformations
@RED89P13
@RED89P13 6 ай бұрын
My dad manufactures cf and in the 80s made a device that looked in all honesty like a reel to reel recorder. It had no regular fins just two pitched reels on opposite sides of a central body like a drone. The reels were surrounded by a belt that used a reverse gearing to compensate the reels. So the motor operated in the opposite direction in the center of the body. It was fully working with a coandra effect if I spelled it right. His idea was not about efficiency but rather flinging air out. He had everything weighted so it would act like its own gyroscope. All it needed was a system to shift the center of gravity and he said it would have moved in any direction. It did hover though and by the time I was old enough it was not operational. After writing this it makes me wanna build an updated version with him. Using a mercury ballast that flows into channels on any side could be a way to control direction.
@CH-bi8ug
@CH-bi8ug 6 ай бұрын
Interesting! Explore this more. Cannot move forward if people such as your da snd you don’t put forth their innovative ideas.
@jacobomoreno1986
@jacobomoreno1986 4 ай бұрын
Para controlar el centro de gravedad puedes usar un contrapeso ligero y alegarlo del centro dependiendo de lo que quieras compensar utilizando raíles por ejemplo y motores paso a paso, de esta manera se puede controlar algo como un drone o cualquier aparato equilibrado
@regularguy8110
@regularguy8110 8 ай бұрын
It's still using airfoils for lift. Small, horizontal rotating ones but still airfoils.
@Rork333
@Rork333 8 ай бұрын
Someone's out there adding some sort of plasma thrust thing to airfoils to help increase efficiency
@mlbr2940
@mlbr2940 8 ай бұрын
​@@Rork333more likely adding some bs
@jamescoull7402
@jamescoull7402 6 ай бұрын
@@mlbr2940centrifugal force is not BS.
@wisdomfox857
@wisdomfox857 3 ай бұрын
​@@jamescoull7402it truly isn't bs idk these people don't think plasma jets aren't real
@dev4gamers73
@dev4gamers73 11 ай бұрын
is it me or this guy looks just like a real life woody from toy story
@pavanbiliyar
@pavanbiliyar 9 ай бұрын
More like Sid, but yeah.
@blacksheep8227
@blacksheep8227 9 ай бұрын
He does
@sbonnett8583
@sbonnett8583 8 ай бұрын
I think you're on to something...
@dtwistrewind7361
@dtwistrewind7361 8 ай бұрын
He's got a snake in his boots.
@adrianoalmeida7790
@adrianoalmeida7790 8 ай бұрын
Verdade, olhando bem, ele parece mesmo. Só falta o chapel de cowboy 😂😅😅
@miguelavazquez87
@miguelavazquez87 6 ай бұрын
This idea looks way safer for personal flying vehicle
@Lamere-rv3of
@Lamere-rv3of Ай бұрын
You know the military is already making a jet like this
@sunso1991
@sunso1991 8 ай бұрын
So that's where my push lawn mower went!
@Prahphet
@Prahphet 8 ай бұрын
😂
@Spyder7051
@Spyder7051 8 ай бұрын
@@Prahphetyo what
@Spyder7051
@Spyder7051 8 ай бұрын
@@Prahphetmusic man here
@josephestrera419
@josephestrera419 8 ай бұрын
😂😅 hahaha ❤love it man
@st.george007
@st.george007 11 ай бұрын
Most things that fly around the earth have bird wings.
@iraa9935
@iraa9935 11 ай бұрын
And quite efficient!
@st.george007
@st.george007 10 ай бұрын
@@iraa9935 I forgot insects, who are efficient also.
@joewatson5226
@joewatson5226 9 ай бұрын
There are more bug species and bugs in general than all the birds ever lived. So most things that fly around the earth are bugs using bug wings 😮😂
@chrism3743
@chrism3743 8 ай бұрын
Imagine typing out that comment thinking you're doing something, but not actually thinking it thru... 🤣🤣🤣 You have time to delete this.
@xxizcrilexlxx1505
@xxizcrilexlxx1505 8 ай бұрын
​@@joewatson5226yeah but bugs are small Planes are huge Wings have their uses!
@derfzitro
@derfzitro 6 ай бұрын
Looks like a fancy lawnmower
@spiderninga9910
@spiderninga9910 5 ай бұрын
That thing is gonna make engineers cry and make it cost so much
@martinheath5947
@martinheath5947 8 ай бұрын
Great idea until you ditch the mains cable and stick a half ton battery inside to keep it going..
@devind2915
@devind2915 8 ай бұрын
Uhhh the cable was just a backup so that if it didnt work it catches it. You can clearly see there is slack in the line as it goes up.... .plus, they have done multiple outdoor flights without cables since....so then there is that.
@martinheath5947
@martinheath5947 8 ай бұрын
@@devind2915 But can it pick up a tin of baked beans?
@mannyechaluce3814
@mannyechaluce3814 8 ай бұрын
@@martinheath5947 or an explosive
@addictionsucks8848
@addictionsucks8848 8 ай бұрын
​@@martinheath5947It can at least pick itself up. That's a pretty good step, and will likely only get better from here. Atlas in it's early stage was a robot on a rope. Now it does flips and can self correct better than some people
@yunus2626
@yunus2626 9 ай бұрын
this video is full of misinformation= "don't recommend the channel"
@grantc8747
@grantc8747 8 ай бұрын
My thoughts exactly
@user-wl5ne6pk6z
@user-wl5ne6pk6z 8 ай бұрын
What misinformation
@d.j.casanova960
@d.j.casanova960 8 ай бұрын
@@user-wl5ne6pk6zI’m wondering the same thing.
@David-ys4ud
@David-ys4ud 8 ай бұрын
​@@user-wl5ne6pk6zthis isn't new technology. It's really old and is hyper inefficient vs regular rotors. That's why in 1927 it was dropped for our modern prop.
@War13ird_Warrior
@War13ird_Warrior 8 ай бұрын
I didn't have to even read to comments to come to this conclusion. Won't be recommending 👍
@potatochipss1
@potatochipss1 4 ай бұрын
That kind of reminds me of the cylinder sails in recent ships
@night3yiscool480
@night3yiscool480 4 ай бұрын
Bro that's like calling the A-10 completely insignificant
@OCD_FPV
@OCD_FPV 11 ай бұрын
Limited design functionality and likely inefficient. Standard propeller has been used for so long because the are the most efficient. In regards to noise, less noise is produced because the “blades” are not creating “resonate pressure differentials” frame or stationary frame components. This can be corrected by offsetting the blade spacing. Auto manufacturers have been doing this for years to lower cooling fan noise. Also how you are you to control yaw? Yaw it typically controlled by increasing or decreasing motor speed. This change in interia allows for the craft to rotate about it yaw axis. However, in the design you have shown the rotational axis on the motor is perpendicular to that of the frame which would like yield a roll or pitch effect.
@autisticreatard7848
@autisticreatard7848 9 ай бұрын
each rotor is able to move in 4 directions so in order to yaw all it would need to do is have 1 rotor move back on one side and have 1 rotor move forward on the otherside also with other drones they use inertia but with things like helicopters they have a colective in the tail rotor witch pitches up or down to creator more or less counter torque and yaw the helicopter coaxial rotor helicopters pitch on set of blades up at a time to create drag and yaw the reason they done just lower the speed of their rotors is because it would be slow due to inertia
@alanhat5252
@alanhat5252 9 ай бұрын
save yourself some typing & read the other comments
@PhilippGeorgiou
@PhilippGeorgiou 8 ай бұрын
This idea is not New. The Principle is from ships. Its is called " Voith-Schneider Propeller " Namen after the german company that build it.
@catchulater7483
@catchulater7483 6 ай бұрын
I remember when they started talking about those horizontal rotors. Impressive.
@KuroHebi
@KuroHebi 3 ай бұрын
One step closer to owning my very own Blade Runner Spinner.
@yyyyyk
@yyyyyk 11 ай бұрын
60 years ago they would have said that this looks like a flying car!
@xxizcrilexlxx1505
@xxizcrilexlxx1505 8 ай бұрын
They did (this tech was in the 90')
@UCannotDefeatMyShmeat
@UCannotDefeatMyShmeat 8 ай бұрын
Try the early 20th century
@charlesmeredith8417
@charlesmeredith8417 8 ай бұрын
If they put a seat on it and a steering wheel all they would need is tires on their rotors and they would have a home built Tesla automobile. Give them an umbrella in case of rain.
@jeff5798
@jeff5798 8 ай бұрын
Where as today we say it looks more like a flying car
@yyyyyk
@yyyyyk 8 ай бұрын
@@jeff5798 😂
@taylorphoenix8
@taylorphoenix8 7 ай бұрын
They didn’t switch it because the old blades were too last century, they switched it so you don’t slice people into purée like a open blender going down the roadway.
@polygonalmasonary
@polygonalmasonary 6 ай бұрын
Funny 😂
@corwin.macleod
@corwin.macleod 6 ай бұрын
Imagine not getting the obvious joke and posting the obvious things everyone knows.
@GeorgeJones-pv5mw
@GeorgeJones-pv5mw 6 ай бұрын
TOO COOL, GOOD. STUFF
@dmarcdavinchi9152
@dmarcdavinchi9152 6 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@MrYy45
@MrYy45 6 ай бұрын
But it will still bkend🤣🤣🤣
@joshschneider9766
@joshschneider9766 4 ай бұрын
Now we got to make these vectorable. That is sick tech.
@TDGroundHawg
@TDGroundHawg 28 күн бұрын
Peterscripol already made an aircraft using KFC buckets, this isnt new.
@DocWolph
@DocWolph 11 ай бұрын
Its a precursor to the Spinner (Flying car) from "Bladerunner".
@swillm3ister
@swillm3ister 9 ай бұрын
Purge purge purge
@ProbablyTheBestUkuleleDadEver
@ProbablyTheBestUkuleleDadEver 11 ай бұрын
Not a new idea, in 1910 the first attempts to use a Magnus effect propeller, and Flettner Rotors were used on some ships
@iraa9935
@iraa9935 11 ай бұрын
Finding the right light but strong materials and efficient power source were the major limiting factors
@ivanyzerhornetteam6023
@ivanyzerhornetteam6023 10 ай бұрын
That is not based upon Magnus effect.
@sebione3576
@sebione3576 9 ай бұрын
So they were trying to build a cylindrical hydrofoil? Why?
@pavanbiliyar
@pavanbiliyar 9 ай бұрын
The internal blades change orientation as the "wheel" turns so that, in effect, two blades are always lifting while the other two don't contribute. Frankly, it seems like a more complex system. But if that's the sacrifice necessary to have a compact VTOL as the objective, without retractable wings or propellers, so be it.
@youtubecommenter-on9kd
@youtubecommenter-on9kd 9 ай бұрын
With the thumb nail I was HOPING someone pulled off the Magnus effect as a lift mechanism, but this is unfortunately not the Magnus effect
@thooke222
@thooke222 5 ай бұрын
Saying a propeller blade is "too last century" is like saying a wheel is "too last millennium"
@ericpettyfishing
@ericpettyfishing 6 ай бұрын
Man that's pretty cool. Makes me have a bunch of ideas
@wesstone7571
@wesstone7571 8 ай бұрын
Ahh, the squirrel cage rotor. Nice to see it used for more than a fan.
@DemonLord_YT
@DemonLord_YT 9 ай бұрын
this design has been in existance since the first plane was born , no one used it because it was too complex and creates more points of failure , so thats why propellers are used today with the combination of wings
@lordjaashin
@lordjaashin 8 ай бұрын
didn't you heard its too last century. we want something new
@UnknownString88
@UnknownString88 8 ай бұрын
​@@lordjaashinbut it's not new, that was his point lol
@STOPSYPHER
@STOPSYPHER 3 ай бұрын
welp, here’s the first flying car prototype
@PythonPlusPlus
@PythonPlusPlus 3 ай бұрын
“We’ll have flying cars in the future” Flying Cars:
@fluiditynz
@fluiditynz 9 ай бұрын
It's a Voith drive (used on tugs) converted for drone configuration.
@jimhiscott2918
@jimhiscott2918 8 ай бұрын
We were all RC enthusiasts. We did this back in the 80's with cardboard.
@Stuntman5701
@Stuntman5701 7 ай бұрын
i was just about to say, i saw multiple youtube videos people building drones with those props, and they are quite trashy.
@jimhiscott2918
@jimhiscott2918 6 ай бұрын
@@Stuntman5701 yes. It was more of a joke challenge to try and get one to fly. They do fly but horribly enificiant. 😆 🤣
@joecarpino
@joecarpino 3 ай бұрын
This is how flying cars will work
@Chrish1981
@Chrish1981 2 ай бұрын
Now that seems like it could actually be a flying car at some point
@AnthonyKing-yk4tn
@AnthonyKing-yk4tn 9 ай бұрын
Not a new idea, a working plane with "propellers" like these were made before WW2, but just never caught on. I remember in the early 2010's my school also making a working model as well.
@lightleaker7045
@lightleaker7045 8 ай бұрын
The world’s coolest lawnmower.
@Kayessee
@Kayessee 3 ай бұрын
The Coriolis effect is awesome.
@bilalrk54
@bilalrk54 3 ай бұрын
Wheel was invented around 4000 years ago but we still use it. That’s 40 centuries.🙃
@glig8829
@glig8829 8 ай бұрын
As a helicopter pilot.. the idea of letting, just anyone fly, scares me to no end. Imagine if car accidents could happen literally ANYWHERE! Its bad enough with them stuck on roads. And I'm not sure people realize that.. flying is a lot harder than driving.
@LIRGECACORSEGT
@LIRGECACORSEGT 8 ай бұрын
Ya and you could f up tomorrow too
@ryanjones2297
@ryanjones2297 8 ай бұрын
we would already have flying cars by now if people weren't so stupid in driving land cars. We have the tech, but its best to not open that can of worms until they can be fully automated. Computers are better at driving than the average person driving a car.
@Gspec5
@Gspec5 8 ай бұрын
That's what prestigious folks said when cars were first introduced. They didn't want every Tom, dick & Harry using vehicles because they were "complex machines". Then mankind made things user friendly and everyone owns cars now, I'm pretty sure if flying vehicles are to become mainstream for personal use, they'll eventually figure out user friendly mechanisms. Then Astronauts will begin complaining about the difficulty of spaceflight and the cycle continues. 😅
@ryanjones2297
@ryanjones2297 8 ай бұрын
@@Gspec5 yes, but 5 minutes sharing the road with the general public is enough to see why we can't have flying cars
@Gspec5
@Gspec5 8 ай бұрын
@@ryanjones2297 Don't get me wrong, i agree we're not there yet, but tons of small general aviation aircraft roam the skies without transponders or collision avoidance systems, there are so many relaxed rules, basically a lawnmower with wings is allowed to roam the skies (with obvious exceptions) but that's my point. They'll start off strict, only allowing trained aviators, then the average Joe will have his chance after robust Ai systems allow for safer travel.
@MagnetOnlyMotors
@MagnetOnlyMotors 4 ай бұрын
Great concept 😊. Ignore the snarkies . They don’t see what’s happening here. 😢
@braddavis4377
@braddavis4377 9 ай бұрын
Hmm... it looks like they adapted the Voith Schneider Propeller from ships to work on aircraft. Clever!
@giin97
@giin97 8 ай бұрын
"how can we make this drone quieter?" "throw some wheels on it!"
@JakeHawken
@JakeHawken 8 ай бұрын
and "quieter" remains to be seen... i mean heard
@Eis_
@Eis_ 5 ай бұрын
Fun Fact: Cyclocopters have existed since the 1900s, so it's also literally 'so last century', but would've only worked well now because of computers actively controlling the blade angles as it rotates.
@prateekkarn9277
@prateekkarn9277 11 ай бұрын
Is this just magnus effect again?
@chickenychickens07
@chickenychickens07 11 ай бұрын
No it’s not, it’s the individual blades angled precisely to produce lift, as it doesn’t move in the air to produce lift
@prateekkarn9277
@prateekkarn9277 11 ай бұрын
@@chickenychickens07 they seem to just be helping the magnus effect by increasing drag since aerofoils create some drag. And the way it "feels" like it would throw air, just seems like extension of magnus effect. Fyi, magnus effect creates lift as well.
@michi386
@michi386 11 ай бұрын
​@@prateekkarn9277look for scheider Voigt Prop, it's not working with magnus effect
@chickenychickens07
@chickenychickens07 11 ай бұрын
@@prateekkarn9277 thanks for the information
@chickenychickens07
@chickenychickens07 11 ай бұрын
But doesn’t the Magnus effect work while in motion?
@peartree460
@peartree460 11 ай бұрын
New my ass... Saw someone make one out of kfc buckets years ago.
@kaneljhawk
@kaneljhawk 4 ай бұрын
This will be the predecessor of flying cars
@pointlesssquire
@pointlesssquire 9 күн бұрын
Now we know where Santa bought his sleigh
@dangitbobby0001
@dangitbobby0001 8 ай бұрын
C-130s still using props
@JakobJakob1
@JakobJakob1 4 ай бұрын
What does the c130 have to do with this
@jensenthegreen6780
@jensenthegreen6780 4 ай бұрын
​@@JakobJakob1 im asking the same thing
@paulmaher7683
@paulmaher7683 8 ай бұрын
Looks like a true off-road vehicle
@cadaver4985
@cadaver4985 3 ай бұрын
"Too last century" wait until this guy discovers how many years ago the wheel was made
@lsudx479
@lsudx479 4 ай бұрын
That company deserves the men's butts discount!
@KnigelD
@KnigelD 9 ай бұрын
Satellites don't need blades They travel around the earth.... Time for zeppelins to be new 😂
@willatwood
@willatwood 6 ай бұрын
Im pretty sure that's entirely different area as satellites don't fly and are launched into space, on a rocket and when they reach space, the satellite is released. There's no gravity or air in space, so there's no need for a satellite to have rotors or propellers. There's nothing for them to propel themselves with. They would have small rocket boosters to push them around if needed. Otherwise they just float, stuck in the earth's magnetic field, going round and round.
@usshared1649
@usshared1649 11 ай бұрын
That technology isn't new...
@johndoe8785
@johndoe8785 6 ай бұрын
Watching civilians rediscover things the military has had for decades is fun.
@wisdomfox857
@wisdomfox857 3 ай бұрын
It was known before the military even loses k into it
@thrash_7349
@thrash_7349 4 ай бұрын
Funny how flying cars in movies had the wheels fold outward and point down, and now helicopters of the future have horizontal rotors
@mitchellminer9597
@mitchellminer9597 10 ай бұрын
It is indeed insane and unbelievable. It is certainly not more efficient. The general idea has been around a while. It just isn't worth doing. One problem is disc area. Generally speaking, moving a wide area of air slowly is better than moving a small area of air really fast. Those four wheels have a lot less area than a helicopter rotor.
@bhatkat
@bhatkat 9 ай бұрын
Can't sell an honest video, just lie
@autisticreatard7848
@autisticreatard7848 9 ай бұрын
from the research ive done it somehow is but i think they are saying its more efficient based on the fuel they consume per minute and that thing is electric but the cost of making 4 rotors instead of 1 per vehicle is going to be a huge limiting factor for the cyclocopter witch is probably why it hasent been touched sens 1909
@leecurtice8207
@leecurtice8207 8 ай бұрын
​@@autisticreatard7848 Oh no here we go again... Just how do witches fly? Is it thrust or lift generated by their broom or is it prue magic? Well, which is it? The idea of flying witches has been around for centuries ...
@autisticreatard7848
@autisticreatard7848 8 ай бұрын
bro how the fuck do witches have anything to do with weather or not a drone is more efficient@@leecurtice8207
@godlugner5327
@godlugner5327 10 ай бұрын
Wow its the 1832 centrifugal fan without a cowling? A squirrel cage with less blades?
@dtharve
@dtharve 3 ай бұрын
That thing looks awesome in flight
@Abyssal313
@Abyssal313 5 ай бұрын
I love how a hundred-year-old design is insanely new, and he can't believe it actually works. Oh, so genius! TOOL.
@isDatBoi
@isDatBoi 11 ай бұрын
what this thing call.....
@ThisIsNotADrell
@ThisIsNotADrell 11 ай бұрын
Long dong blades.
@ZirothTech
@ZirothTech 11 ай бұрын
Just added a pinned comment with information :D It's from a company called Cyclotech
@michi386
@michi386 11 ай бұрын
cyclorotor
@1SqueakyWheel
@1SqueakyWheel 9 ай бұрын
It's been nearly 20 years since I basically had a dream about this machine. I say basically, because I'd recently, at that time, sold my beloved little standard cab shortbed 4x4 95 Nissan hardbody pickup. In the dream, I had decided to keep it and attached giant squirrel cage blowers to all four wheel hubs, and table legs to each corner of the truck, and I managed to make it take off and fly when I revved it to high RPMs in 5th gear. It was a fun dream for awhile. I never worked out the detail on how I'd isolated the orientation of thrust to be downwards. There was no housing diverting the flow, it was all open air like this thing, so I just chalked it up as a stupid dream. The dream ended as I was trying to figure out how the hell to land it safely, since every time I let off the throttle just a little, it began falling fast. I was getting worried when I woke from it. It's one of those dreams I've somehow managed to remember through all these years, so this video really excited me to see!
@jeremyswift635
@jeremyswift635 8 ай бұрын
I've had lots of flying dreams as well I would fly objects and even like super man many times apparently it's a sign that we arr astrolprojecting while asleep
@wesstone7571
@wesstone7571 8 ай бұрын
Flying like superman is...
@wesstone7571
@wesstone7571 8 ай бұрын
If you had this dream, that means it's time for flying cars. There's three just created that are on the market. One has 4 rotors built into the body. Very little room for passengers and gear.
@foxxy46213
@foxxy46213 6 ай бұрын
That thing looked incredible.... incredibly inefficient an underpowered
@user-qn5mc6vp5d
@user-qn5mc6vp5d 7 ай бұрын
So this is how we get flying cars
@M0d4l3
@M0d4l3 11 ай бұрын
Did I miss the part where the name of the device is mentioned? or the company name?
@M0d4l3
@M0d4l3 11 ай бұрын
Found the info: Austrian CycloTech technology has succeeded in the eVTOL floating test equipped with a CycloRotor using Schneider propellers used on ships. @echgmbh5271 has its own youtube channel
@raddepadde3177
@raddepadde3177 11 ай бұрын
yes.....cyclotech
@user-di5er6uo5e
@user-di5er6uo5e 9 ай бұрын
the craft literally has the name plastered on it. Either youre just blind or just want to complain, sometimes its better to just not say anything, especially if its just cow dung coming out of your mouth
@norml.hugh-mann
@norml.hugh-mann 9 ай бұрын
​@@user-di5er6uo5ecan't see it on a small screen...maybe use your own advice
@meateaw
@meateaw 9 ай бұрын
You certainly missed the pinned comment with the URL in it
@swt5470
@swt5470 8 ай бұрын
Cool innovation, but absolutely the wrong person to be presenting it.
@wmrustycox
@wmrustycox 5 ай бұрын
That system of propulsion is called the "Magnus Effect". They have been many attempts at making an aircraft that uses the "Magnus Effect" in the past.
@thomasread163
@thomasread163 4 ай бұрын
That's the coolest lawnmower I ever saw😂😂
@shallowgrey
@shallowgrey 8 ай бұрын
"Propellers are just too last century" *30-06 has entered the chat*
@Hamburgerpimp
@Hamburgerpimp 4 ай бұрын
A new means of turning birds and such, into confetti?! Sign me up, kind Sir!
@ToddMeadows
@ToddMeadows 4 ай бұрын
I believe the blades are actuated blades as well. They change position as they move in a circular direction.
@constantineb6433
@constantineb6433 11 ай бұрын
Paddles are not new get facts correct
@daifuco
@daifuco 4 ай бұрын
"it's too last century". This is a fashion channel
@TheLepke2011
@TheLepke2011 3 ай бұрын
I can't wait to hop on and ride the flying thingy that has four perfectly spaced choppers for my arms and legs!
How Bionic Wings Are Reinventing Drones
12:26
Ziroth
Рет қаралды 1,9 МЛН
Unlimited Fresh Water: Can MIT's Breakthrough Save Us?
15:17
Ziroth
Рет қаралды 1,1 МЛН
女孩妒忌小丑女? #小丑#shorts
00:34
好人小丑
Рет қаралды 49 МЛН
الذرة أنقذت حياتي🌽😱
00:27
Cool Tool SHORTS Arabic
Рет қаралды 11 МЛН
Fast and Furious: New Zealand 🚗
00:29
How Ridiculous
Рет қаралды 49 МЛН
طردت النملة من المنزل😡 ماذا فعل؟🥲
00:25
Cool Tool SHORTS Arabic
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН
Vortex Cannon vs Drone
20:44
Mark Rober
Рет қаралды 19 МЛН
Could This Change Air Travel Forever?
14:08
Mustard
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
World's Fastest Camera Drone Vs F1 Car (ft. Max Verstappen)
12:05
Uncovering The Genius of Fibonnaci Turbines
17:42
Ziroth
Рет қаралды 613 М.
Flying a $495,000 Human Drone
11:47
Supercar Blondie
Рет қаралды 1,6 МЛН
Building a HIGH SPEED Rocket Plane
17:53
ProjectAir
Рет қаралды 1,6 МЛН
The Self Balancing Monorail
8:33
Primal Space
Рет қаралды 9 МЛН
Building a rocket bird (ornithopter)
20:40
Works By Design
Рет қаралды 2,2 МЛН
Unlimited Wave Energy: This Buoy is the Future
12:27
Ziroth
Рет қаралды 288 М.
Most POWERFUL Drone I've Ever Flown! DJI Flycart 30
19:11
Potato Jet
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
Новый фонарик в iPhone с iOS 18
0:49
Wylsacom
Рет қаралды 308 М.
Data recovery from MicroSD using PC3000 Flash & Spider Board 😎
1:01
Сделал из зарядного устройства нечто!
0:48
how to make soler led bulb | How do you use a soldering iron first time?
1:00
Nk creative experiment
Рет қаралды 1,3 МЛН
iPhone VS Samsung🤯
1:00
Skinnycomics
Рет қаралды 16 МЛН