Well, at least they didn't call him a hoe.

I like rakes. They kill the first zombie to invade the lawn.

@@anzyroadside2374 is that a pvz 1 reference?

@@anzyroadside2374 w reference

@@LumberjackMC The zombies ate your brains!

Is it? It is! it is? Is it? it is… it is!!! It is. Is it? Is it!!

No you can have 1 evil and rest be town or you could have 15 evils and no town

It's possible for the town to be 14 town and an exe or neutral evil, instantly winning d2

@@arandominterneter560 Was there a game like that in AA or CAA history?

@@arandominterneter560 I've won a game that way, it was most bizarre lol. Think it was 13 town a jester and an exe or something lol

@@naet1983 Best I have seen is one evil, who walks right into vet. still a day 2 win.

Ya, town overall was switched on and evils kept killing eachother off. Plus pirate didn't have a choice but to side town. If he tried to turn, Jailor can just exe him and end it. Pirate probably would've gone after Jailor immediately if he naively told pirate who he was.

Pirate played their best out and didn't run into desu. Luck aside they had a great game.

*protect an evil

He just always seems to post when I decide to randomly check lol

Fr tho I think he’s in my walls

@@chasef6840 no he's not because i am

@@allanscott21 There’s enough room for both of you

@@SmoothTurtle840 🤣🤣

14 just being stupid, I'm so confused about how much stupid ended up in one game

I'm surprised the retri didn't leave even while dying n1

Even so, getting a confirmed evil out of the game is always a good move. Silent WW can fake claim exe and pass the invest results. It's possible for the exe to lie about their intended target and falsely confirm maf as townie. Exe will always turn against their townie target when evils have the voting power, so getting them out means one less vote is required to push evil people up. There's so many ways an exe claim can screw up the game for town.

Game 1 was wild

B and V are similar but not the same sounds. Anyone who learned English from a young age wouldn't have had a hard time pronouncing them differently unless there is bodily deformation. Edit: The B sound is easy to make due to needing only the lips but you need your front upper set of teeth and lower lip for the V sound so that could be an issue. You can try it and remember the subtle difference between them. My impression is that B comes with a bang, leaving behind the following vowel while V melds with the following vowel for a while longer.

@@anzyroadside2374 Someone who's lightly studied phonetics here. The differences between B and V are primarily two-fold-B involves pressing both lips together (a 'bilabial' sound, meaning 'two-lipped') and V involves pressing your upper teeth into your bottom lip (or 'labiodental'- 'lips and teeth'). B is also what's called a "stop" sound while a V has a continuous sound. When we speak, we breathe air out of our lungs and mouth while making the sound with our mouth or throat. Stops are sounds where we actually cut off the airflow from our lungs while making the sound instead of it having continuous airflow. That's why B and P sound like short pops-the airflow is stopping quickly-but V is a continuous hum/buzz because the airflow just keeps going. It's also why your 'b with a bang' analogy really works, by the way. You hit the nail on the head right there. Vowels require continuous airflow, so when a vowel comes straight after a stop (like a B), the cut off of air from the stop has to suddenly start again for the vowel (hence that feeling of disconnect). But with a V, the continuous airflow can smoothly go straight into the next vowel without any interruption. Additionally, in 'BG' versus 'Vigi', the first vowel in vigi will be a short 'i' sound (like in 'sit' or or 'bridge')-followed by a long 'i' sound on the second vowel-whereas BG is pronounced 'beegee', which has both vowels as long 'i' sounds (like in 'seat' or 'eat'). Vigi is said like 'vidge-ee', while BG sounds like, well, 'bee-gee'.

@@pokelolmc6826 This is detailed and I like it.

The wiki says that WW just straight up auto wins against mafioso and doesn't mention anything about traps as a condition for the stalemate detection.

Ahh so I would have won even if there was a trap in the maf dang. thanks anyways

when you focus on 1 thing and 1 thing only. ignoring everything else even if it is actual evidence proving your theory wrong. for example if u´re town, think someone is bad and trying to lynch him, despite literally everyone else telling you hes good and providing evidence

I was 5 parallel seconds ahead of you.

@@ValunarTonix Better luck next time, let's enjoy the video.