Check out Moosejaw: geni.us/5eRAf Osprey Exos 55 Pro: geni.us/OlmFdC Osprey Aether: geni.us/70B2UU Zpacks Arc Haul: geni.us/3pBiA

I never looked back after switching to the Exos 48. It carries the load like nothing else whilst remaining lightweight. I always called BS when they touted on about their '''suspension back system''' but lord almighty they weren't spewing nonsense! It's honestly one of, if not the comfiest pack I've ever worn!

The thing with Osprey packs is even though they're a lot heavier than your average UL pack, they also tend to be way more comfortable. I've found that the frame and suspension and their anti-gravity system help mitigate that extra weight and allows you to carry a lot more stuff with a lot less discomfort, and the straps are really thick and padded and comfortable. If you're the kind of backpacker who likes to hike in luxury and bring a chair, a roomy two-person tent, real food with cookware like skillets etc, then these packs are the way to go. Even if you have a more minimalist setup, the suspension on these packs will make you feel whatever weight you do have less so than other packs would. For instance putting 20 pounds of stuff into an UL backpack and 20 pounds of stuff into an Osprey backpack and trying them both on will usually reveal the Osprey pack to be a lot more comfortable. I also tend to use all the extra bells and whistles. The provided rain cover has kept my stuff dry in heavy thunderstorms before, while the brain is where I store things I might need quickly such as my first aid kit, lighter, and my warm clothes in the wintertime. The hydration pocket for a camelbak is also pretty nice and the mesh on the frame allowing air to cool your sweaty back is a must-have imo. For reference I use the Atmos 65.

" I'm not a fan of osprey packs; "I just don't believe that backpacks needs all these pockets, zippers and straps", but i really like this model, except , it lacks zippers and straps ! Hard to please.....

The reason the Exos 55 seems bigger than the Arc Haul 60, is that Z packs includes the capacity of all the pockets in their number. Most manufacturers list only “covered” compartments in their volume. Open pockets are unmeasured additional volume, since you can put bigger items that stick out in them. Exos has 55L in the main compartment + brain. Stretch pocket and side pockets are unmeasured additional storage. Z Packs arc haul 60L is 47L body, 8L stretch pocket, 2.5 each side pocket.

I'm an Exos 48 user and find it incredibly comfortable even with a heavier load. Kind of wish I had got the 58 (UK camping requires a wide choice of weather options) but living with it for now. Thanks for the honest review

I commented on one of your other videos but this should have been the one to comment on. I own this pack and love it. One signifcant modification, however, makes it much better if not perfect. My inspiration is the Gregory Focal 55. On that pack side compression straps may be routed hidden/inside the stretchy side pockets allowing compression at same time giving full use of stretchy side pockets even under f 7:28 ull compression. Problem with the Exos is the compression straps are permanently on outside of side pockets creating a real use problem when pack is fully compressed. What's more is the bottom side compression side is couple to/attached to the hip belt. My experience with this pack proves that this coupling s unnecessay and by decoupliing the compression strap from the hip belt results in more comfort and better function of the hip belt on my hips and then with a couple small 1/4" slits in ripstop fabric, a few hidden stitches plus super strong waterproof fabric glue, I have rerouted compression straps to under/hidden/inside stretchy side pockets. I also detached the upper compression and moved it. Now I have full use of stretchy side pockets and large front stretchy pocket even while the pack is under full ccompression. Water bottles and other items go in and out without a struggle whatsoever. Or even run longer items inside of side pockets yet still under comoression with full functional use of stretchy side pocket such as a water bottle beig put in or taken out without messin with the compression. The modification looks totally factory like it was designed that way. Side hipbelt pockets also are more functional being uncoupled from compression straps because when the belt is niw cinched down it does not stress pockets back in a weird way. This ended up being more comfortable as well. I wish there was a way to send pics. Anyway my mods added no weight and made the pack hugely more functional and just a little more comfortable.

I have an Osprey Talon 11L daypack and I fell in love with it the first time I used it. My partner and I hiked a trail that has a portion that requires rappelling down some pretty steep inclines on ropes and then 6km on very sharp rocks to a secluded cove. A well balanced pack is necessary for sure footing as if you wreck an ankle you'd need to call the coast guard in before the tide traps you. (Bay of Fundy, highest tides in the world) and on the way back as soon as we climbed back up the ropes we were hit with a severe thunderstorm (wasn't in the forecast). Deafening thunderclaps and heavy rains and the inside of the pack stayed dry (with my Nikon DSLR in there too). had some dry clothes in my dry bag and wasn't expecting wet weather at all so learned a lesson for next time. Also I realized it was missing a piece for the stow on the go trekking pole feature and just emailing Osprey lastnight I got a reply in less then an hour that they were preparing to ship me out the part soon (my first time using a warranty like this) I would love to get a Stratos 36 or 44 as an overnight or weekender. I only dabble in UL so the pro versions are a bit too rich for my blood but I would certainly try Osprey again. My only complaint is that the cool Osprey logo wore off so fast. They should really embroider them or something.

I love my Osprey pack. It took me thousands of miles across Europe, probably hundreds by foot. It was a great investment and quite durable. I am an athletic, stout guy and don't mind that it's not an ultralight backpack. I wanted size and features and quality construction and it delivered. It's ten years old and just as good as the day I bought it. Osprey would be my first choice for my next pack should I ever need one. I just really loved the way it took an enormously heavy load and spread it across my body in such a way that I didn't really notice the weight.

I got hooked on Osprey years ago with my Xenith. Cavernous for long trips, comfortable, easy access. Sold it to a kid hiking the AT. I just bought a Atmos 65. The waist belt is tighter than I like so I'm looking to swap it out; but I got it at such a good price, I had to buy it. Your pack looks good so thanks for sharing.

I have a 5 year old Osprey Atmos 50 and I love it. The suspension and the mesh is what makes it for me. Also the bladder compartment with the little strap and clip is well thought out. It does weigh in at 4.5 lbs but it sure is comfortable and functions well enough that I don't feel the need to get anything else. Cheers

An osprey atmos 65 was my first pack 5 years ago, and it’s the same one I use today. There is a lot of extra weight and unnecessary organization, but I love the pack. It’s incredibly comfortable and adjustable and there is no wear. I have no desire nor need to purchase a new backpack, so it saves me a lot. I don’t understand how you could actually hate the pack, even with every opinion you listed, but to each their own. I will gladly continue to enjoy my time outdoors because of my atmos.

I have a Hyperlite that I love, but it leaves my back wet from sweat. I recently bought the Exos 58 for the fact that it stays off of my back during warmer backpacking trips. I had a hard time finding one that really felt like it “belongs” on me, and am still not quite happy with the fit, but my back feels so much happier. The pack fits everything I need and is completely comparable to the Hyperlite. And yes, I was nodding when you were talking about the compression strap, which is marvelous on the Hyperlite. The Exos has it’s own methods of compression, but nothing like the Hyperlite.

Good video, you left out the mighty guarantee. I send my aether 65 in at the 10 years old mark for repairs. In addition to the repairs, they put a new belt and shoulder harness on the pack. Pretty much a new pack.

I have one of the previous models of this pack and can definitely recommend it. There are somethings that I like better with the new version (hip belt pockets), but there are some things I like on the older model (more user friendly buckles, easy to remove brain, that kind of thing)... just preference but I'd still recommend it. Only wish it was water resistant.

I've had a Gen.2 EXOS 58 for 6 years and love it. Most comfortable UL pack I have ever owned.

I have a Ren65 that runs just under 5lb. Packed I am hauling right a 40lbs. I use it as a day pack and come in at around 15lbs without my sleep system and food. Clearly, I am not a UL hiker! I'm a 5'2", over 50, overweight, female hiker. Finding anything that actually fits is a challenge. Osprey's adjustable everything works well in getting the pack fitted and comfortable.

A great review as always! I tried to move away from my Osprey and tried a Mariposa 60. On paper the Mariposa is an awesome pack however for me there one huge problem in that without airflow between my back and my pack I really struggle. I just could not get comfortable with the Mariposa. In my experience, when it comes to packs, lighter is not always better, the key is comfort and weight transfer to your hips.

Nice! I bought this exact backpack mere two weeks ago, and I love it just the same. The construction is comfortable, yet stable, and I experienced none of the weight shifting I dealt with before, when using older and cheaper backpack.

I’ve been waiting for this UL craze to come full circle on backpacks. I figure it’s only a matter of time before people realize that ‘traditional’ packs were designed for backpacking and will offer the best experience. Stripping down frames and necessary load bearing features is backward engineering to when packs were just a bag with straps. It’s ironic that backpacks started simple and eventually evolved to what marketing has now convinced people is a ‘traditional’ (outdated) design.

I've been an Osprey guy since I put on my first Atmos AG, and I currently own 5 of their packs including two with the Anti-Grav suspension. It's heavier, but SO comfortable. I think the newest Airspeed design has me tempted to check out an Exos though

I don't have time these days to do extended trips, so for all my overnight or three-day hikes, I don't mind a few more pounds for comfort, and my Osprey packs always deliver on that point!

I’m definitely more traditional. UL packs don’t work well for me. That are simply too flimsy. Add the steep price tag to the lack of durability and it’s a no go. I love my Osprey pack! 🌿

nice review, SPECIAL thanks for putting metric values, I always struggled with that, when I heard ounces, pounds, inches etc. I have Arc haul and since Europe doesn't required bear canisters, I'm absolutely satisfied customer, not looking for a change

I think Osprey makes great packs for what they are. Are they UL? Generally no. But if you like extra pockets for organization and/or carry heavier weights they make packs suited for you. Also, their warranty is among the best in the industry. I still have an Exos 58 that was my primary winter pack until I recetnly moved up to a Superior Wilderness Designs Long Haul.

Damn, I’m an admitted Osprey fanboy and have their packs in most sizes from the 5L waist belt up 🎒… and I just bought the Zpacks Arc Haul for my next through hike. Not that I don’t like Zpacks gear (and I have a bunch of it), but UK import taxes add around 30% to already expensive gear.

I picked up the Osprey Exos 58 last year to use as my 3-season pack and it is by far the most comfortable pack I own. It weighs just under 2 lbs, much lighter than my older packs.

New to this whole backpacking. I wanted to thank you for the videos they really put into perspective what I might want/need. Although it may seem it may be a while before I can afford some this, but hey we all got to start somewhere.

I just thru hiked the AT this year using the Exos Pro. I loved it. The water bottle being accessible from the size was a godsend. I also didnt use the brain and had room to spare. I never used the red compressuon strap tbh. 10/10 converted a few anti osprey folks to

I love my Kestrel 38. It's very comfortable, fits me very well, and handles the small amount of gear I have wonderfully.

The Atmos AG50, before redesign this past year, is similarly laid out but has an amazing harness system that is worth the added weight IMHO. The newer one I think adds zippered pouches more like the AG65, but it's still relatively unencumbered wirh straps and so forth.

Recently purchased Exos 58 took it for 8 days, 7 night traverse of Isle Royale National Park, mid-August 2023. It did over all very well. However, a part of the frame broke, along the very bottom where it curves around the small of the back. Only issue with the break was that it caused a constant creaking sound with each step. I did overload it, max carry weight is listed as 35lbs. I had 41 without water. 47 pounds with water. Good thing is I bought it from REI and can return it. Will I buy another Exos 58? Quite possibly, but will explore other options comparing each to all that I did like about the Exos 58.

Two trips with this pack for me and I’m happy enough I’m with it. Less back sweat than any pack I’ve ever used and comfortable enough when the load isn’t too heavy. I agree on the brain it’s generous size and can fit a lot. Combined with the side and back pocket and hip belt it’s good amount of storage for various things.

I just bought this today at my local outdoor store, then I see that you reviewed it positively. Perfect.

I've used a Zpacks pack but ended up swapping it for an Osprey Kestrel 38L because all those dyneema fiber packs (Zpacks) are very slippery against clothing. So the Zpacks tend to slide downward putting weight on my shoulders. It doesn't seem to matter how tight I get the waist straps. Despite Osprey being made of heavier material, it's shape conforms to the curvature of my spine and also has lots of rough surfaces that help it stay in place against my back. Because of their unique design features Osprey are my most comfortable packs (I have several, lol) which also allow me to carry heavier weights comfortably. I also have one of the older Osprey Exos packs but still find the Kestrel more comfortable and better at trabsferring weight to my legs. I couldn't carry more than 20lbs in my Zpack before it became uncomfortable. With my Osprey Kestrel 38L I can carry 35lbs comfortably for 16hrs a day no problem.

I went from a Kelty Coyote to a ULA Circuit. While I liked the extra pockets on the Coyote, for organization, I'm okay with the trade-off for the weight savings. And despite the Coyote having decent ventilation, suspension, and adjustability, the Circuit is just more comfortable to me. But the main thing I miss is the brain. I used it for storing maps, my electronics (in a ziplock), and pretty much anything that goes on my head (hat/beanie, bandana, buff, headlamp...). It was just nice knowing where those things were and having easy access to them. It'd be kinda cool if someone like ULA designed a light/waterproof brain that could be purchased separately and attached to their packs.

Osprey is ubiquitous in the UK as we don't have as much choice when it comes to backpacking brands. I tend to avoid them but I've recently purchased the Exos 48 (non-pro) as it cuts the nonsense. I'll be testing it next week but I like the look and feel of it so far. The suspension system and the ventilation it provides seems worth a little bit of extra weight.

Interesting you mention the compression strap on the inside as a downside. After a year of use I now specifically like that about it and I'll explain why: With the tradition straps you compress every single thing in your backpack and there's no real way to use it when you carry something that doesn't do well under compression (fragile souvenirs, some foods, etc.). With the Exos Pro I can still compress most things, but pack the stuff I don't want to compress on top of it.

I just recently picked up an Eja Pro 55 - the ladies version of this pack - to replace my Eja 48. I love the pack with the exception of the hip belt pocket (which you mentioned) and how much of a pain it is to remove the brain. Osprey saved a bunch of weight by removing zippers, pockets, and clips on this pack, but sacrificed a bit of convenience. Overall though I'm pretty pleased. One thing I wish Osprey would do is provide clip adapters with their packs so we can turn the brain into a fanny pack.

When I was shopping for packs the green vest at REI asked me if I was looking for ultralight or comfort. I chose door 2 as my first pack was exterior frame and canvas. We looked at Gregory and Osprey. Don’t knock it if you haven’t tried it, particularly for weekend warriors.😉

Trditionnal pack might not be for yyou, but its is still good for 85% of hikers. People who are not into ultralight, will prefere these pack do to resistance, confort and how much you can load them with heavy stuff. the Osprey Aether is good but I still think that the best Osprey pack is the Atmos AG. Best confort and loading weight you can have on the market.

Just did a 5 day portage trip with the atmos 50, carried 50 lbs of gear like a breeze. It may not be an ultralight through hiker bag but osprey bags carry heavy weight like no other.

Another close-to-ultralight pack with a removable brain is the Granite Gear Crown 60. And it has zippers on both side pockets and a better top closure. I’ve reviewed it on my channel. It’s also very comfortable. But Osprey’s suspension is the best.

I bought the Osprey Exos 55 Pro a few months ago and love it. I agree with your points except for having an open hip pocket. I do actually like having one zipper and one open. One additional complaint: i wish the hip belt pockets weren’t so far back. This pack is extremely comfortable and fits my gear extremely well (even better than the hyperlite). I compared the hyperlite and really wanted to keep hyperlite but three things that i couldnt get over: 1- for some reason hyperlite straps hurt my shoulder even after trying different size packs, adjusting straps, and adjusting the frames. 2- water bottle access. While i can access my smart water from hyperlite pockets, its much easier with the exos 55 pro. 3- hyperlite=sweaty back. My main concern with the exos pro 55 is durability. Time will tell but im skeptical on the material durability and how small the hip belt clip is. I would have gone for zpacks for a backpack but they are just too expensive as i never see them on sale like i do with the two other packs mentioned above.

I have had the Exos 55 for about 10 years now and love it still. My only complaint is I don't like the original colors that I choose back then and now want to get the new exos pro 55! :)

I've never seen a hiker use an umbrella while crossing a stream before.

I bought an Osprey on sale at REI years ago that's like the green one in this video, and I've always loved it. The straps and suspension are outstanding.

as a 6'4, admittedly heavy then I should be backpacker, I am constantly struggling to find gear that 1. fits comfortably, and 2. doesn't add a bunch of weight. I'm glad to see these "in-between" bags. Large enough to carry my gear, light enough to offset the increased weight my larger tent/bag/pad add. And have a suspension system to carry it all comfortably.

Really nice review. After osprey came out with packs over 6 lbs last year, it’s nice to see they offer something in the 2lbs range. I’m always looking for a great pack when a bear canister is required. Now, if they’d just make that pack in Ultra…

The Arc Haul 60L is really a 40L, and all those attachment points makes them prone for potential failure. It is a very comfortable and functional pack though.

Many commenters seem to be confusing the Exos to the Exos Pro...the Osprey pack you have reviewed here. I have tried a Zpack, a Durston Kakwa, and the Gregory Focal as well as the Exos. Th Exos and Focal were the most comfortable, but not light enough. Then I tried the Exos Pro 58 and bought it. After a couple of mods, without adding any weight to the pack, my Exos Pro 58 is a FANTASTIC pack. The modifications were to the compression straps...moving them under the side pockets matching the functionality of the Gregory Focal. The Exos Pro is very light and way more comfortable than the Zpacks or the Kakwa.

I have recently bought the Exos 48 to shed weight from carrying the Atmos 65 which is about 2lbs heavier, but the Atmos blows the Exos out of the water in terms of comfort, its far superior with the thicker padded hip belt and thicker shoulder straps. The Exos straps feel sharp after a while and I am constantly "jostling" the pack to get a comfortable position. My opinion is a bit more weight in the pack is well worth the extra comfort. Besides which the Atmos can be modified to shave off a few ounces.

I bought an Osprey Exos Pro 55 and can say it is quite comfortable for me, while weighing half of what my older traditional packs weigh. No regrets. Lightweight daypacks tend to have poor back ventilation so I might just take the brain off for dayhikes. The Zpacks Arc Haul is probably the closest competitor and is lighter but also more expensive (I haven't tried that one).

I'm a proud user of EXOS 58(not a PRO version) good things - first of all, it's designed for guys, the ladies version is called EJA, so it just fits great - as a result, the suspension is just fabulous indeed - adaptive back length - compartments are really functional suspicious things - gets wet in no time and rain cover is not included - recommended load 11 kilos, when the load is about 15 kilos the backpack starts bouncing on your back - in some time it will start to make these squeaky sounds

I do military style rucking so I am very often forced to take high weight stuff, so the idea of this high quality suspension system is intriguing to me

They came up with the pack brain around the Korean war. It was an additional bag that attached to the outer straps and could help keep a load down.

So glad you reviewed this pack I have been looking at waymark but when this came out it peaked my interest

I've got the atmos 65. It's been with me through some good times but it is certainly heavy. I'd love to try this out but I'm not sure I could justify the expense over what I currently own.

Good review video. I own the Arc Haul Ultra and it does not have a 60 liter internal capacity. The internal capacity, per the Zpacks web site, is 47 liters. So a head-to-head comparison of internal volume is not valid. That said, it is a comfortable and extremely well made pack. I attempted to carry a BV 475 inside the pack for a week along a portion of the JMT last Fall. The pack bulged and eventually the frame stays fell out, leaving me with a frameless pack. Poor headwork on my part and not a pack problem.

I’ve been using Osprey packs for 6 years now, I have 6 and love them for how comfortable they are and how they handle a load. But last year I bought 2 Granite Gear packs, a Crown2 60 and a Crown2 38, and have to say I like them at least as much. The GG 60l can’t carry as heavy a load comfortably as my 50l Osprey, but keeping it under 30lb it’s amazing. I’ve had the GG 38l up to around 22lb with no comfort issues. They have all the features I want and none I don’t, the fabric is very water resistant, and they even come in colors other than the same old black, blue, green, and red! My pottery clay/rust 60l looks awesome!

Buying Atmos 65 was one of the best decisions I have ever made. I've also got the Manta 32 for day hikies and long city trips - an absolute joy.

I’ve used conventional high volume packs all my life because I hate attaching things to the outside of my pack. That said, I want to rethink things in terms of weight when I do the PCT and want a much lighter pack. 55L would likely be too small for my liking, and with long food/water carries, a max of 30lbs would be less than I’d be seeking. The Arc Haul 70L looked promising, but what you just showed regarding the bear can scares me on that pack. I find it very difficult to hone in on the *right* pack for my once in a lifetime epic hike that’s upcoming.

I have a military back injury. Typically does not bother me backpacking (as the weight compresses my spine) but an uncomfortable pack would. I moved to an Osprey for this reason and don't mind a tad bit more weight. It's also why I hammock camp.

So one thing I read on ONP's website is that they require bear canisters in certain areas of the park. There are areas that they don't require them which I found kind of odd.

I have the previous generation of the Osprey Atmos 65 AG, and have a core weight around 20 lb, and will tip over 30 when carrying food and water. I love the idea of the Exos Pro pack however, I love my side vent and bottom and entry zippers too much and can't justify saving 2lb to give up those features.

My UL kit is 8lbs base. It's a cheap Columbia bag I got from Walmart. For heavier trips (100 mile+) I use an Osprey. Way more comfortable for heavy weight

I've been using the Osprey Atmos AG for a few years and its a very comfortable pack, but I'm constantly looking a ways to lighten it. Without the lid, its a little over 4lbs. I know I can do better, but haven't because its comfortable. I'll have to check out the Exos to see how it feels!

My atmos 65 is heavier than other packs, but so comfy it feels lighter. IMO, and for my british hiking, it's great.

Good job with this. I've had five Osprey packs over the past eight years or so. The only two I have now are the Kestrel 38 for winter and the 48 for backpacking which handles cans well. Reason being is each of the others had suspended back panels which developed mind-numbing squeaks in the peripheral frame. And I don't overload. The Kestrels are definitely a weight suck, that I try to shave elsewhere, but it's worth it to not deal with squeaking. Maybe it was just luck of the draw, and wouldn't happen again, but I'm not sure I'll take the risk.

I have the Atmos AG 50L. The AG system is pretty amazing at weight distribution.

At age 70 with a taste for long hikes (400km, 2 weeks upwards), ultralight is a requirement not an option. I’ve been using an Osprey Atmos 50 (mostly without the brain) for several years and really like the comfort and the antigravity system. However it does weigh 1.850kg and I’ve been wondering about a pack to bring that weight down some. Looks like this could be the one!

My favorite backpack - about 25 years old - has this type of mesh suspension, so I'm definitely interested in these Osprey offerings... though I'm inclined to look at the Exos 58 because it solves one of the problems you have with the 55 Pro *both side pockets zip closed (**and I can save $30). I've stated before that I'm a truly traditional backpacker, with over 50 years of experience, and I don't like to spend a lot on gear, though lighter weight gear is becoming more appealing as I get older *and it becomes more mainstream (in design and price). I am not willing to sacrifice comfort for weight, in most cases, which is why I've not made the step to an ultra-light backpack, yet.

If you want the "modern hybrid pack," go with the Deuter Air Contact 50L. The only problem is the quality of mesh pockets that tear at the seams. If the mesh was more durable it would be the best pack every made.

I recently purchased a kestrel 48 for an approaching Mount Adams summit attempt. So far so good comfortable pack.

I'm a rookie 'packer looking for comfort more than UL. I don't know that I'll ever pack more than 3 days so a bit of extra weight won't matter as much to me. I definitely want lighter gear, but as of right now, weight is never better than 3rd priority for me. And really my priorities are a balance of cost, "good" and weight

The fact it still has that flap is enough for me to not bother going back to Osprey. It may be a user thing, but I find the brain pocket to be more of an annoyance. Maybe I am doing it wrong, if I only put gloves or my rain jacket in there... But I usually kept a med kit in there and it just flopped around against my head/neck. I'd rather have an oversized belt pocket or low profile side pocket. Next pack I get is either a replacement Hyperlite or the Kakwa 40. I did enjoy my last Osprey's back ventilation though...

Several years ago I went from the heavy Osprey Atmos 65 to an ultralight Hilltops Pack's 45 liter Raven. I sacrificed the comfort of the framed system for the knee saving weight of the frameless pack. Now this is an interesting compromise - possibly. I think I could reduce my gear weight to compensate for the extra pound between this Osprey and my Hilltop's model. As I check gear for an upcoming very long thru-hike, this may be worth the try.

That red strap inside the draw string is to create a "head hollow" anove the shoulder straps so the bag doesnt slap you in the back of the hood. It is more effecyinside the pack like that.

As someone who sufferschronic fatigue and pain the suspension and lightweight has me sold, i'd add a zip or velcro to that left pocket so that phone or gopro doesn't fall out if I fall forwards. Other than that it looks good, darker green or brown options would be nice Osprey. Love all your videos and work you put in, thanks for the Nikwax video did all my gear last two days 😊

I actually love my Osprey bag. I have an ultralight bag as well and I actually find my Osprey bag to be significantly more comfortable and I get more use out of it

While I think that a lot of Osprey packs are overkill and overweight for their use case, I do recognise the areas where they do well: 1. Their "all-mighty guarantee" (even though this is officially non-existent in Australia) 2. Their range of kid's packs. As someone with small hikers in tow, I particularly appreciate the ability to give them a properly fitting pack to carry their own gear. 3. The Poco. Going back in time, I had to carry those same small hikers, and the Poco was my vehicle of choice. The rigid arms either side of the child's "cockpit" seating area meant that it didn't collapse when loading a reluctant tiny human.

Very excited to see this, will definitely consider it, we have been afraid to give up traditional pack suspension... Sounds gr8, ty

I would definitely try this pack. I love my Osprey "traditional" pack already so I'm interested in a lighter pack from them!

I actually picked up this pack. I’m not an ultralight backpacker, but def don’t mind keeping my weight down. Initial use of the pack worked well, but I definitely need more miles in the field. Overall; great review, and I can’t want to use this pack more!

I have about 4 Ospreys, including this one. I like it very much but agree with your critique of it.

Nice review man! My first day hiking pack was a osprey stratos 24. I loved that pack!! The trampelene back is second to none! Until i tried severe ultralight gear then i realized how much i missed their trampelene mesh back panel. Although alot of other osprey packs dont compare to the stratos trampelene back. They seem to have shrunk the seperation overtime on the back mesh? I do like this new exos 55. The brain of these packs are a handy feature. I say that too cause i noticed alot of people who use ultralight roll top packs still find themselves without enough room. So before you know it gear is filled every exterior pocket and some even have gear dangling off the pack somewhere. Seems thats where alot of ultralight packs fail. I want the pack im using to hold all my gear without gear hanging off the pack too much. Only thing i would like to see osprey do is use premium pack materials like Robic nylon, dyneema, X-pack, ultra pack. Maybe even design their own roll top pack but keep this new trampelene style back and frame suspension. Not sure if that crosses over Z-packs patents or not but would be very nice to see. Or i would like to see an update Levity pack made with better materials and offered in more subdued color ways. White is just tough to keep clean. Good stuff man! Hike on!!

I am really wanting to get this pack. I have been looking at the Exos for awhile as I am looking to lower some pack weight, and then when Osprey came out with this Pro model, I'm sold! Just need to keep saving a little more, so the Mrs. doesn't complain too much about "more gear"

I have the Exos 58 and tried the Exos Pro in this video. The Pro has a thinner frame and less rigid suspension. This all resulted in the weight being carried too much in the shoulders. I returned it. If you haven’t tried the latest Exos 48/58, you don’t know what you’re missing! Yes, it weighs more than the Dyneema rucksacks, but it’s easier to carry and you’re less sore at the end of the hike.

Picked this backpack up a month or so ago. I’m a traditional backpacker that’s dabbling into ultralight and I really like this pack. Only complaint I have is I think the red strap seems to be on backwards.. other than that I would absolutely buy it again

I agree with walking with an umbrella. It works great, obviously none-techincal trails.

I have an older exos I got at a garage sale, my biggest issue is that it's a medium, and I really needed a large, so it doesn't carry as well as it should. Aside from that, I have noticed it doesn't perform well over 30lbs, which is a weight I struggle to get under with my loadout. From what I see of the new pro model, I think it might be perfect.

I find a pack brain to be so useful that I have added a Zpacks multi-pack to those that don't have a brain. Nice to see some progress in the hybrid-pack market, but I think they can still get a little lighter.

i love the atmos ag LT 65 and its way ligther then the regular atmos ag.

Almost looks like a good pack, but appears to have a deal breaker feature for me - a compression strap that goes over the side bottle pockets.

I'm so shocked that the bear canister fitting was the plus! I tried one out at home and returned it. The bow in the back to allow a gap for ventilation worked great for that but got in the way of gear. I may have had a different one. It also wouldn't stand upright and the straps were soooooo convoluted.

Thanks for the review! We have a hiking trip on the JMT in August and I am up in the air on this pack. I know a lot of people lean towards the ultralight packs on this trail, but my full load will be around 15-18 pounds, so I am at a crossroads as to which route to go (ultralight or this pack). Comfort is honestly the most important thing to me, and that might sway me towards this pack. Just wanted to know your thoughts on this. Thanks for the video!

Cost is king. I carry a heaver pack because i won’t spend more on lighter gear that has similar functionality. The exception might be the pack it self.

im currently using the exos 58 and you are right on it with the air suspension. Sooooo nice and comfy. Its my go to pack. Probably wont even look at other packs for years to come.

I just got the Granite Gear perimeter 35. Weighs a little more than I’d like but the comfort is off the charts. I have an osprey daylite plus. I swear it weighs more than my Perimeter lol

Exos 58 with an added phone pocket on the shoulder strap is pretty solid. Though the Pro variant has a much lower listed weight and is very intriguing bc of that.