It makes all animation look like strange watery flesh tendrils, and sometimes you want strange watery flesh tendrils

Yeah I definitely thought the water actually looked really cool in the ai version. It almost looked more like a 3d render or something

I really liked the 60fps green water one, it was just really wobbly and watery...

same. the interpolation gives nice smoothness

similar to the use of cgi in traditional animation, for example in The Prince Of Egypt

Personally I didn't like it, it felt TOO fluid to me. It felt off with how fast it was.

Thats funny, thats the second one I dislike the most, it really messed up the timing of the falling goo

@@lesigh3410 the fluid like motion could be interpreted as slime or “goop”

@@SoulTaken i know that's the case i'm saying it was too fluid for me, it felt unnatural

Repent to Jesus Christ “The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands.” ‭‭Psalms‬ ‭19:1‬ ‭NIV‬‬ h

drawing the keyframes: yippee!! this is so fun :) inbetweening: god is dead and the music in my ears is turning pale

Praise the development of AI. Imagine drawing each frame over and over again with slightly difference and for each second, instead of drawing 12, you multiply it by 5. There's a reason why Endless Eight in Melancholy of Haruhi suzumiya didn't succeed. that's because it's boring. Now, artists wants to do that irl? Yeah, AI art is bad.... if you're originally bad at art.

Also the very simple shape of the balloon helped keep things consistent.

Agreed. With a simple animation it's much more noticeable.

i kinda dont't want that, it will make animators get paid even less, also less jobs for artists

@@karlldraws I don't think the worry is about replacing artists. Like... they won't get paid less because they'd have another tool to assist them in the process. Which is what this AI interpolation is, a tool. AI could never have the creativity, human imagination, or artistic intent to make a hand made animation look any better. Interpolation like this is just using the wrong tool for the wrong thing, which is what I think Adamillo is referring to. And just hoping for something that can make a billion hour process go by a little faster. However, in-between animator is a job title, so I see where you're coming from too. But I still don't think AI can get to a point where it's better than the artists themselves because AI can't create the way a human can. So I wouldn't worry about anyone losing their jobs.

@@CatychoVT There are already neural networks that can generate an image from a text prompt. You tell it to draw a cat with a napoleon costume holding cheese and smiling, and it does that with incredible accuracy, to the point where it looks completely natural. The thing is that a program wouldn't need to be on the creative end of the process to make an animation. You tell it what the story is, give it a few references, and voila, the job is done. So Karll has a good point. Animators and artists will sadly become less relevant. Good scriptwriters are still in great demand though.

@@CatychoVT but also inbetween animators won't really have a job

Repent to Jesus Christ “The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands.” ‭‭Psalms‬ ‭19:1‬ ‭NIV‬‬ h

@@repentoryouwilllikewiseper8741 h

Read my name

Goes to show how little our eyes truly pick up 🤣

@@repentoryouwilllikewiseper8741 L + ratio + fatherless + you fell off

Because these people don't know how to use interpolation! AI isn't something you just slap it on and be surprised when it's not perfect

​@@TragicGFuelSo true

That's definitely the Achilles heel of motion interpolation. It'll be interesting to see if the technology overcomes this issue as it becomes better at detecting that sort of dynamic timing, now with generative AI becoming much more aware of broader context than it was just a few years ago. Instead of just creating a hybrid of arbitrary static frames, it'll really have to rationalize what certain objects are and how they should move/accelerate/decelerate in order to look natural, much like inbetweeners have done in the past.

I disagree. There was no buildup because the the frames for the in betweens has no buildup. The in betweens are just that, in betweens. It's still up to the artist how much in between two frames will have.

bruh 🤓

@@VARUN-bv6vu what

@@VARUN-bv6vuwhat

What​@@VARUN-bv6vu

@@VARUN-bv6vuwhat

Maybe it looks at the frames both before and after and tries to figure out what the difference is? I could be wrong though

Ok

@@xmysef4920 that's correct. But I was referring to the fact that those gaps are filled with "complex" movements, they're not just in-between motion frames. For instance, instead of gradually present the opening of the umbrella, the AI concluded that it made more sense to have an extra animation which didn't not originally exist.

The original did the same just less agressive with the opening

@@uishaggy8552 I just rewatched it. You're right. I slowed it down and noticed that the right one is 1 frame ahead, maybe that was what confused me.

Thanks for mentioning it, it was amazing seeing it this way =O

@@MarceloKuchiki kinda exaggerated the best and worst of the 60fps

Wooow right just tried it out. Didn't think it would merge

thanks for mentioning it! i think it works by creating the illusion of an image in the middle

@@dane1382 it works because the left eye focuses on the left image and the right eye on the right image. The double vision gets mixed in the middle. I do this at the sound board at church all the time, I like seeing all the potentiometers blend together. It's also how those magic eye pictures in the papers or the big posters worked.

Ok

Fancy meeting you here B)

@@ChordsBoy bruh this happens way too much. I keep randomly meeting people i know in youtube comments.

@@VoxelMusic Huh, that's weird lol

Wdym by real footage

My thoughts tbh. I've seen a few animations with the same effect and it was done on purpose so I wouldn't completely write off this technology. It can be pretty useful for some particular projects.

It looks like cool and smooth wiggly woggly animation style to me.

The works which have been appearing with AI-based digital rotoscoping lately (Joel Haver probably one of the most known in KZfaq) use this brilliantly. The "glitches" add more to the final result.

Repent and follow Jesus my friend! Repenting doesn't mean confessing your sins to others, but to stop doing them altogether. Belief in Messiah alone is not enough to get you into heaven - Matthew 7:21-23, John 3:3, John 3:36 (ESV is the best translation for John 3:36). Contemplate how the Roman empire fulfilled the role of the beast from the sea in Revelation 13. Revelation 17 confirms that it is in fact Rome. From this we can conclude that A) Jesus is the Son of God and can predict the future or make it happen, B) The world leaders/nations/governments etc have been conspiring together for the last 3000+ years to accomplish the religion of the Israelites C) History as we know it is fake. You don't really need to speculate though because you can start a relationship with God and have proof. Call on the name of Jesus and pray for Him to intervene in your life. - Revelation 3:20 Revelation 6 1st Seal: White horse = Roman Empire conquering nations under Trajan 98-117 AD & Gospel spreading rapidly. 2nd Seal: Red horse, bloody civil wars with 32 different Emperors, most killed by the sword. 185-284 AD 3rd Seal: Black horse, economic despair from high taxes to pay for wars, farmers stopped growing. 200-250 AD 4th Seal: Pale horse, 1/4th of Romans died from famine, pestilence; at one point 5,000 dying per day. 250-300 AD 5th Seal: Diocletian persecuted Smyrna church era saints for ten years, blood crying out for vengeance. 303-312 AD 6th Seal: Political upheaval in the declining Roman Empire while the leaders battled each other. 313-395 AD Revelation 7 Sealing of 144,000, the saints, before trumpet war judgments, which led to the fall of the Roman Empire. Revelation 8 1st Trumpet: Alaric and the Goths attacked from the north, the path of hail, and set it on fire. 400-410 AD 2nd Trumpet: Genseric and the Vandals attacked the seas and coastlands, the blood of sailors in water. 425-470 AD 3rd Trumpet: Attila and the Huns scourged the Danube, Rhine & Po rivers area, dead bodies made water bitter. 451 AD 4th Trumpet: Odoacer and the Heruli caused the last Western Emperor (sun), Senate (moon) to lose power. 476 AD With the Western Roman Emperor (restrainer of 2 Thes. 2) removed; the son of perdition Popes took power. Revelation 9 Two woe judgments against the central 1/3rd and eastern 1/3rd of the Roman Empire. 612-1453 AD 5th Trumpet: Locust & scorpions point to Arabia, the rise of the Muslim army. Islam hides Gospel from Arabs. 612-762 AD 6th Trumpet: Turks released to attack Constantinople with large cannons (fire, smoke, brimstone). 1062-1453 AD Revelation 10 The little book is the printed Bible, which was needed after the Dark Ages when Scriptures were banned by Popes. Revelation 11 7th Trumpet: Martin Luther measured Roman Church; found that it’s an apostate church, not part of true temple. The two witnesses are the Scriptures and saints who proclaim the pure Gospel and testify against the antichrist Popes. Papal Church pronounced Christendom dead in 1514 AD. Silence for 3.5 years. Then Luther posted his 95 Thesis, which sparked the Protestant Reformation and brought the witnesses back to life. Millions of Catholics were saved. Revelation 12 Satan used the Roman Empire to try to wipe out the early Church, Satan was cast down as the Empire collapsed. Revelation 13 The antichrist beast Popes reigned in power 1,260 years, 538-1798, is the little horn of Daniel 7, son of perdition. The false prophet Jesuit Superior General rose to power from land (earth) of Vatican and has created many deceptions. Revelation 14 Points to great harvest during the Protestant Reformation & wrath on Catholic countries who obey antichrist Pope. Revelation 15 Overcoming saints victorious over the beast. Prelude to 7 vials and judgment on those who support Papal Rome. Revelation 16 1st Vial: The foul sore of atheism was poured out on Catholic France, leaving them with no hope, led to revolution. 2nd Vial: The French Revolution started in 1793, killed 250,000, as France had obeyed the Pope and killed saints. 3rd Vial: The French Revolution spread to rural areas of France, where Protestants had been killed in river areas. 4th Vial: The bloody Napoleonic wars shed the blood of countries who had revered and obeyed the antichrist Pope. 5th Vial: Judgment on the seat of the beast. Papal States invaded in 1798, Pope imprisoned, removed from power. 6th Vial: The Turks vast domain dried up, they were only left with Turkey. They lost control of Palestine in 1917 AD, Israel became a nation again in 1948

Not really tho, it had this weird “jumpy” feel to it, it sorta looks like the smoke keeps moving and stopping at weird intervals

The only way for the AI to correctly interpolate the frames is for you to train the AI on animations with initially 60 frames per second. Then you remove the extra frames and see if the AI can interpolate the missing frames. If it does well, then apply the trained AI to other similar animations with similar missing frames.

I liked the smoothness with the goop, but the splooshes moved sometimes

around 6:44 really shows the problems. if you pause and compare the images it is so off from the original it's like someone remade it

literally my first thought

Pin this comment please.

Yeah, he sums it up pretty well when he says that A.I cannot possibly understand the intentions of the animator, the animation in 60 fps looks smooth, but also janky and blurrier. In fact, These tools weren't actually made to interpolate animation in the first place, it was made to interpolate real life footage. I'd love for this interpolation to be done correctly in the future, in cooperation with the artist's intent, the crisp animation is worth the wait.

Yeah

@@arpita1shrivas Sometimes it can be done with but most people just think if you put some anime in 60fps its going to look better which doesn't make sense because most of the time the anime isn't ment to look super smooth

as an animation student, i am yet hopefull but terrified for the future of ai animation.

Ai is for another purpose

You can see Low Quality Videos in 60 fps!

Well the point of motion smoothing isn't for animation in the first place, it's meant for real life

the original purpose is for live action video footage.

WOWW YOU DON'T READ MY PROFILE PICTURE 😶😶❌❌

strangely enough I thought that looked the worst

@@ichigo_nyanko yeah it didn't look like liquid at all

@@beezzinha it looked more like liquid than 12 fps

you really don’t get this do you?

@@slitproductions1493 what am I not getting?

Ikr

I think these AI post production looks weird but cool. It's something that most educated animators would avoid, and that what makes it a unique style. I am pretty sure there will be a music artist really want to use this AI to make oddly satisfying yet highly unique visual output on their music videos.

@@cupofjoen hahahaha I was just thinking about that 🙃 cheerz mate 🍻😁

wouldn’t that only be possible if the drawing is completely proportional- and drawn from your own pov (ok, idk if something close to your eyes can be considered proportional even if it’s real)

Yo lo veo igual al original Si ves los dos, te das cuenta que es lo mismo XD Solo con una ligera diferencia, que es: las cosas tienen un pequeño tambaleo, (jiggle)

What do you mean with hypnotic?

@@Tobias-et1xt the steadiness is really satisfying to watch

60 fps makes it look robotic

60fps never looks good in animation to me personally

About as hypnotic as a trainwreck... "I just can't look away!"

@@dont5014 ok

True, at least in my opinion

(it’s already use as a tool to help animator. and should not be think as more than that, a tool that helps animator)

This is true with all AI. People act like GPT3 is a replacement for a writer, but it’s just another tool a writer can use in a workflow when it’s useful.

sounds like using grammarly lol. these things are _tools_ at the end of the day, not total replacements.

There are things made for that But yeah

I feel like that's just how most opinion online is like, they either absolutely love it, or absolutely hate it. No middle ground at all.

I am also mesmerized by it. Its like a weird effect. like mushrooms.... or so i hear

"or so i hear" spoke like someone who has taken shrooms. But yeah, it really does give that somehow highquality yet wobbly feeling to everything

I did like the effect on the last animation. It loses some of the original animation frames (the artists intention), but certainly if planned out could be used for tweening/between frames and save a LOT of time for those, for the artist to concentrate on keyframes.

Agree 100%. It's like a different technique. I liked the crazy wobbly effects

Like Joel Haver, who uses glitchy effects from AI as part of the aesthetic of his animations.

Dude, if you think you got the time and could have some fun, just go for it.

@@dont5014 ok I won't now shut up

Really depends on the animation and the person doing running it through AI. I have seen my fair share of horribly made AI videos where they just run it through the program, how ever, I have to admit, with proper care, I've seen it produce amazing effects.

When somebody says something is choppier than flip books, that means something.

@@burger84. Yeah because the ai wasn't designed with flipbooks in mind. One of the reasons why it doesn't work is andymation. I'm not saying he's bad, but his inconsistency in the colouring makes things really hard for the AI. Not to mention, his flipbook recording is 12 fps, while the app mainly focuses on footage with 24+ fps. You're most likely going to get better results with actual live-action footage or professionally animated footage such as Adventure time.

I consider that 60 fps looks better. That "much" sounds exaggerated and selfish.

WOWW YOU DON'T READ MY PROFILE PICTURE

Yeah, the fireball looks amazing

I love when people say "60fps bad nooo1!1!1!!" Just because someone popular said, like come on, we haven't used it properly yet

@@awesomesause. It's not so much that 60FPS is bad, it's more about the artifacts that the AI creates, which muddles up the original intent of the animator's. You even see in this video that some things are really strange in the AI's interpolation, like the distorted background in the graveyard, or the green slime just not having much "oomph" to it. The AI was never designed with animation in mind; it was trained for live-action and that's something it does very well. One day, I'm sure there will be an AI tool that's capable of properly interpolating animation in a way that truly follows the principles of animation and matches the artist's vision, but that day sadly isn't here yet.

@@awesomesause. The artistic intent of animator's matters and it's a total disrespect to animators by claiming '60 fps' as better which totally ignores most of the Animation's fundamentals. AI at its current state would be ever replicate and expand on the intentions of animators; its not algorithm that can fill in the expressiveness of those original frames based on few parameters and condition. The AI only see and act according to the data of the frame not according to what the collective data represent.

@@obscure8125 you said the same thing and stretched it into a paragraph.

I think that's how anime does things. If I recall, there are generally 2 types of 2d animation. Early Disney-like, where the framerate is smooth and consistent, or like anime where shortcuts and made and some parts gets more budget which is "Sakuga" as they call it. Studio Ghibli movies stood out because it's animated LIKE disney and stuff.

huh, i didn’t know that! I did have an idea abt the shortcuts in anime (esp w how hard it gets memed at times) but the studio Ghibli thing is news. The different-budget thing too, but I guess that makes sense lol… neat! :D

this is a really cool idea!

Wow, I NEED THIS

I think that would take a whole lot of time if he were to individually check every frame. A 10 second animation would mean 600 frames in total. That is unless he finds a way to do this automatically.

@@TheReal4th Import both videos as a collection of frames, compare them, delete matching matrixes from "fake" one and export - is the solution I see

@@jurbinwerdin730 i think u could just delete every n-th frame ... simple as that

Animations already have some weird frames to make movement seem more natural It's called smear, you could search it on KZfaq, there is a cool video explaining how it works and what is it's usefulness

@@David-bz3wh Yup but the AI does not count those frames as different from the others, so it just kinda adds stuff without knowing the proper reason to add them

@@godofgae8137 yeah. That's on the artist. The AI algorithm won't know that.

Yeap, for this style of "unstable" animation, the AI interpolation doesn't look horrible alot of the time unlike "regular" animation

My two cents: interpolation can eat a big ol' fat chode. People see it and think that's what high frame rate looks like naturally. Recording natively in 60fps for live action yields a much different product. I would, however, love to see NATIVE 60fps animations. If someone has taken the time to carefully and patiently craft even a short example, I have yet to find it. Very esoteric concept it seems.

Ross! Thanks man! 👊

@@andymationdon’t worry I’ll fulfill the fist bump also don’t give up !👊 😀

Thanks!! That’s so cool to hear

@Check my about page link your mother

I'm 2nd

3rd hahaha

4th I wonder if the 5th will continue this chain

It already is

@@lapatatadelplato6520 only real issue is old footage has a wildly variable frame rate because it relies on someone physically cranking a film camera which is why in a lot of old war footage sometimes it is really fast because “holy crap something just blew up” and startled the cameraman causing a faster crank. They’ve done some reworking of old film in a documentary I can’t remember the name of but they also colorised the images along with giving it a coherent frame rate. However, those were all done by people and not machine learning

same, it's the only one where i really noticed it, and it looked cool

@@titaniumtoad2448 the most early reply i ever encountered

@@alpha26butshrek54 yoo 58 seconds ago

@@pavletrnic1433 2 minutes ago!

@@Unpug 4 hours ago!

*Balloon

@@BlairGlitchProject y’know, you could just… edit your comment

@@victoriouswinner7745 that's not their comment, theyre correcting them;_;

@@xheom whoops, my bad.

Original is much better than A.I 100%

Result is Rickroll!!

Yep, I definitely felt like Andy was using this for the wrong purpose and was kinda bashing it for not doing great while its soul purpose was to refine real-life shots.

Right now interpolation can be really great if you use it right. I think using interpolation for flip books isn't the right thing for it, but there's definitely other things that it's good for. Just because something isn't good for one thing doesn't mean it's hot garbage dog water and you should immediately bash on it. Andy only hearts the comments that fully agree with his opinion on interpolation

​@@Stickamajig I think you misunderstood my statement. The ai I am hoping for in the future would "fill in the gaps" between images drawn by a person. Keyframes and extremes would be the human drawn part. Key frames and extremes include those fun smear frames you mentioned, as well as unique poses besides the "basics" you might imagine. (Also by true definition storyboards have no animation, they are thumbnails, aka loose doodles that represent a scene. The name originates from stickynotes stuck to a board, a story board, that could easily be changed and rearranged. Unfortunately in today's industry, storyboarders are expected to create animatics, with clean keyframes, rough animation, pans, voice work, etc. ...Storyboards should not be used as a base for what I am talking about.) Basically the interpolation ai I want where you can determine smooth ins and outs, would be no different from current "tween animation" in 2d puppet type animation, where you can morph shapes and colors. It has it's uses, like in backgrounds, nuanced motion, or texturing. I love frame by frame 2d animation the most, personally. And as stated I have 2d frame by frame animated professionally before, but trust me there is no "pride" in the stupid amount of time it takes to rough out an animation or clean up an animation. Replaying 2 second animation scribbles 500 times to check for errors or tweaks, cleaning up lineart so it doesn't look wobbly, etc, is the bane of my existence lol. Knowing I drew, redrew, and redrew again every frame makes me disheartened sometimes. Knowing I spent a lot of effort on art that shows up for .25 seconds is deflating. If instead I could focus on the good smears, extremes, keyframes that I drew, that would be much more personally rewarding. People forget that puppetry IS animation. 2d animation aims to imitate puppetry. It's just that 2d frame by frame tends to capture the nuisances of implied space/emotion in poses and facial expression/abstracted perspective that 2d puppet tween animation or even sometimes 3d animation can miss out on. That's why interpolation ai is so exciting! Finally I can roughly "tween" with authentic 2d animated forms, or apply smooth lineart to a "tween", or atleast, that is the hope for the future. And no hate to 3d or 2d tween puppet animation. In the right hands, the tools can be used to create amazing things! Just look at Spiderverse, Rapunzel's Tangled Adventure, or the fight scenes in Rise of the TMNT. 2d animation + tween + 3d asset creates wonderful pieces of animation.

@@ttt.6457 Exactly! Try to fly a submarine and of course it will fail, it was made for water, not for air. Same goes for all-evens interpolation made for live action being used on a flip book.

I think what you've described already exists. I don't remember the name, but it has the AI imbedded in the animation software. The thing used here is made for real life videos, which might be why it works well for lego stop motion.

honestly I doubt AI will ever be used in such intent, since it was never made for this. Possibly if we design an ai that may actually work for this sort of video media it may become a tool but I find it very unlikely because running someones animation through a dumb ai isnt doing much for the creator, its really taking away their credit too if it ends up looking good in the end because an AI might have helped with that. Animation will never be the same, done by an AI and it will never be able to combat how someone actually wants something to look like is what I think.

The technology is already used by some animators (the acani engine being a good example). The "intent of the animator being lost" thing only applies when a finished animation is just lazily fed to an AI by someone who doesn't know what they're doing. If the animator themselves are using interpolation strategically, the result can be great.

The reason for the strange frames is the AI cannot understand the elasticity of objects. For instance, if you make an animation of a person kicking a piece of wood, you may understand that the person's shoe when contacting the wood may deform a little bit, but the block of wood should not deform much at all. If you give this same animation to an AI, most likely the AI will make both the person's foot and the block of wood deform instead. This would make the block of wood move around as if it was jello, or perhaps a block which is is wrapped around in a piece of cloth. All the AI knows is there's 2 frames that it has and it needs to make a frame that goes in between them. The easiest way to do this is to take the average of both frames and merge them together, but that does not always make the correct results.

@@vanillamilkshakes7418 I agree. Most animation are not drawn to take advantage of this technology. Draw one with the intent of taking advantage of this tech then I think it would look better. What we're currently doing is like adding ice cream on top of a pizza, if the ice cream is the animation and pizza is the AI. Of course it wont work, ice cream is not made to be put on pizza. Change how the animation is drawn and we can change that ice cream into pepperoni.

@@amigac0debasic13 whats funny is this was probably said about digital art when it first became a thing

Not really I don't think, especially at 6:39 it really struggles to convey the motion and energy - you can tell just by looking at it - but I agree But in some circumstances, if used intentionally by the artist it can look great

GOD JESUS TOLD US TO LOVE EACH OTHER!LET'S NOT DESTROY THIS WORLD!NO WAR

@@potshot5888 GOD JESUS TOLD US TO LOVE EACH OTHER!LET'S NOT DESTROY THIS WORLD!NO WAR

The problem is not Just intention, the movement literally changes by the wobblyness, since for example, when you look at rain drops, they don't bend in the air like that cloud animation shows in 60fps.

Exactly, the smoothness just draws my eyes to the 60 fps side. It's just so damn good! Lower fps has a vibe, I 100% enjoy good things even if they are low fps, but I'm all for team high fps if I can choose.

Lol

Thanks, now I won’t get Rickrolled

I posted this on my dad’s account… I’m in huge trouble

@@ting-jiafan745 remove it then

@@OrangsGZ notification forgot

Smooth but very flawed

Idk I liked the smoothed anime one because how it looked more like an animation

@@samuelflipaclip7415 and an animation didn’t look like an animation before AI interpolation? Huh?

@@samuelflipaclip7415 for me it’s the opposite

@@calimber it’s kind like the cuphead show art style thing right?

yes, he did just-

Rick

Roll

unofficial rickroll

​@@slimanicik Roll

I agree. I very much like the look

@@TrillMurray Me too. Though I caught a weird frame. (:

5:13

WOWW YOU DON'T READ MY PROFILE PICTURE 😶😶❌❌

@@dont5014 ...okay

I don’t get what you’re trying to say. Animated shows aren’t done with 60fps like, at all. They’re usually done with 24fps rarely being done with even 12 or 48fps.

This is such a good idea. PLEASE!

Love that idea!

Same

It would probably be cool, but we probably already know the answer

It would look like its covered in vaseline, i recommend watching noodles video on interpolation.

are you gonna fuq the ai

@@bigfanofyoutubers I thought your Moms' name was Karen not ai

I noticed that, too -- slow playback revealed a lot of sins that weren't evident at 60fps. I'm sure AI will eventually be good enough to not make those mistakes at all, but dinging it for having a few bad frames in a giant stack seems a bit much. I also disliked the patchy inconsistent coloring in the latter animations. They work fine and are a great aesthetic in animation, but with the smoothing, it's like smushing together two very different art styles and felt discordant to me. Maybe if the AI got better at smoothing them as well it might work, but as it is, it didn't work for me.

Especially the fireball made me think „how would I have done the frames between?” And I don’t know! The original version just had jumbled mess as mater. So yeah the AI did exactly that, just a wild transformation. I think that was a 9/10 great work.

Good points, but you have a gura pf and therefore everything you said is irrelevant. You have been reported for spam.

Well said

To be fair the stuff is fairly simple (nothing against it lol). It’s more noticeable the more detailed things get since that leaves smaller room for error

As a complete outsider to animating, I feel like the ai versions look way better than the originals. The wobbly frames when slowed down make the full speed versions look way more natural and flowing to me. What Andy sees as crispness in the originals, just looks jittery and unfinished to me.

@@TheEgoify probably is, I see the wobbliness the entire time out of the AI footage. Its honestly a bit nauseating. The slime, meteor, and the graveyard to me are the worst offenders.

@@joshuawilloughby2696 I liked the slime and meteor the most! Specifically because they are flames and slimes so it really added to the effect, to my eyes. Your animations are fantastic regardless though

I think in the virtue it could really help artists with the in bale stern frames to save time. Its not advanced enough yet, but it eventually be.

As a software engineer, what I don't get is why he used AI. You could use AI to figure out what 1+1 is, or you could use a normal calculator program to find out what 1+1 is. Here, you could use AI to create image transitions, or use a Morphing program to create the image transitions.

@@arbiters487 possibly AI could be used to make just slightly more "fiddly" morphing tools. "Shape tWEENS' as they tend to be called by us using Flash, tend to be really fiddly and only work with the more mechanical movement (like say one simple like). i coudl see for, say, really really close together inbetweens, AI could possibly be trained to do THOSE transisitons.... though like Flash/TOonboom puppet rigs... it'll merely "work" and won't look as good as legit changed drawings. I try not to worry toooo much about AI art (haha not succesfully), and tell myself it'll be a tool when needed but artistic skills will always be important

not really ai doesnt automatically generate an entire animation out of nowhere, you need to make the animation first all by yourself

Yeah, I could see where you're going.

It looks horribly awkward

Organic is the flip book. you are talking about something organic made by a computer.

Phoenix Souls People create animations on the computer too. Doesn’t mean you can’t describe it as “organic”.

@@phoenixsouls9797 Alphafold can simulate protein folding, making capable of constructing something organic.

@@BlueRiptide Made by people in a computer, not by a computer.

Slower than molasses moving uphill in January?

​@@insouciantFox why specifically january lol

@@freyasobsession my guess is because its most likely going to be frozen...unless you live on the equator

slower than 3 snails pushing 2 snails.

If you're a fan of phrases, you might like this one. "I'm so hungry I could eat the butt off a low flying duck"