D

Oh so we’re learning the alphabet now?

E

D

D

Sup

I'm a big fan!

Yes

Sup

hay dude!! love your stuff!

2 dimensions ahead of everyone else

Cringeness Level too

@@canuko1228 no, cringe is someone who's a tryhard and behaves weird. The fact that you call him cringe while he is making fun of himself, shows a cringyness on your side, which you should avoid, in order to not be cringe. Don't be cringe kids.

@@canuko1228 the only cringe guy in here is you

@@dj.matexx you mean 2 dimensions behind. 1D man.

However its kind of what Cpt Kirk did on the Kobayashi-Maru-Test. Adding color coding is basically re-introducing the 2nd dimension he took away from it at first, albeit in an unintuitive way. So yea, basically he cheated on his own goal. ha!

@@rubbelkatz3672 How is adding color coding a re-introduction of 2D?

@@zana6327 The gradient color coding *is* a form of dimension, albeit different from the spatial type.

@@rubbelkatz3672 i think he was talking about the rotary sensor

@@docredstone461 There was no rotary encoder. The gradient strip used to detect the players rotation is argued by Rubbel to have added another dimension. I don't think it counts as cheating, as that is simply the control system, and the game itself is still one dimensional. That is the argument Rubbel presented however.

Thanks for the inspiration!

Cough cough * jelly and Slogoman and crainer

@Logan Poulsen it’s funny because I thought the exact same thing

Jelle in 10 years: *I made a 592834D Game!*

@@Jason-uu8yi crainer used to be pretty ok but then fortnite and minecraft w/ jelly/slogoman ruined him, or at least his videos.

@@Jason-uu8yi crainer USED to be great

it was your sub-conscience ;)

@@JelleVermandere that’s gotta be it

@@conze3029 you Should say it's like-ly to be it 🤣

Same

@@thisisnotkp come on, that was so bad, you need a *pun*ishment

How would you manage that?

the thing is we only really have 2D vision so i dunno how reasonable that is

@@darksentinel082 exactly

@@darksentinel082 yea like a tv scrren is only 2d

@@juliewinchester1488 It's doable. Start by creating a world with a 4D object for example. Then project the entire object into a 3D axis system like you would when doing any transformation (exactly the same thing as viewing a 3D object on a 2D screen, just flatten the 3rd, or in this case 4th, dimension). While performing the transformation generate a color texture with rgb values corresponding to the distance each part of the 4D object was moved during the squish of the 4th dimension (the projection). This texture when applied to the flattened but still 3D model will describe how deep into the 4th dimension each part of the 3D model is. Idk what you're all on about with only having 2d vision. Yes, monitors are only 2d. But that doesn't matter. We can still move around in a 3D world and interpret 3 dimensional shapes even through 2d screens. If you also allow a second eye as with vr then we can interpret 3d depth even without movement. We can definitely see and distinguish all 3 dimensions in our world. Every 4D objects can be squished into a 3D shape in 4 different ways depending on which axis you choose to squish onto the others. It's exactly the same principle as projecting a 3D shape into 2D. You squish one of our 3 dimensions onto the other 2, as though you're viewing the object from far above or from the side far away etc. Finally painting the objects we see with some colors really isn't difficult.

not vr tho

reality game

Including Atari, but no one talks about that.

Just a game, no prefix.

What they're saying is it's a first person, 1-d game with motion controls in which you have to turn your body

Very exciting

A reaction time test or some sort of rhythm game is what I can think of.

There's a game called "Super Press Space Bar to Win RPG" and it's basically a singular point going through time in steps.

actually, it just nothing. no dimensions no nothing. there is nowhere to move or look at. making anywhere to look at or move will make it a 1 d game as it adds a dimension to move or see physical object/objects

@@aksvinss Imagine a game where you press a button once. I think that's the simplest possible game. It implies a dimension of time since there must be a period before and after the user input, but I think you can't get around that.

I was thinking the same thing; if we could only buy "stock" in his career; he will skyrocket!

Thanks Pascal!

@@JelleVermandere NASA wants to know your location .

thank YOU for watching!

@@JelleVermandere Thank YOU for the amazing video!

@@Poepy thank YOU for watching!

So true

>where you have to do nothing Godville entered the chat

@Lukas Sound implementation makes for a valid 1(+) Dimensional game. I can't find the reference anymore, but one of this kind was made on gameBoy in the past. It looked like a sonar, the player had to approach "things" while the screen only showed green growing lines on the edges. I can definitively think of a valid 2D game from a monosonic source, the frenquency acting as horizontal line, and volume as the vertical line. Given sounds are flattened (no "upper/below" deformation transmitted), a monosonic-paced sound game is 1D, and a stereosonic-paced game is just stereosonic-1D . Same for the led-strip of the op: it's1D, but each diode acts as a single independent information source; the game would still work with the only frontal 1 diode (if not so much greenish), given the more diodes are present, the more reference points the player has. TL;DR: no screen != no dimension, sound already acts as 1d information. A 0D-game is likely a game that closes itself when you launch it, or an uninteractive idle game like ProgressQuest (still featuring a 3D-lookalike interface, for what it's worth).

The only thing I could think of for a 0D game would be a 'Press the button when it lights up' Game.

0D game is like play with your mind

It will become my new RGB ceiling light ;)

Wow bro you watch jelle? Love your devlogs btw

Thank you! 😁

Thanks!

thanks man!

Thanks!

Thank you! 😊

Thank you very much!

Glad to hear that!

I always need a montage before I can say anything ;)

I do…

@@CodingWithBen thats the joke