Remove milan juve inter napoli roma next

Perhaps Benfica and Porto in Spain?

Remove top 6 from the bundesliga

Remove Lech Legia and Raków from Ekstraklasa (it needs mod)

Remive all the 4 star+ clubs in Europe

If they're as big as you say why aren't they already attracting their own big money? Why do they need the English to hand out charity?

@@asensibleyoungman2978 do you even realise how stupid you sound? ahahaha. spurs receive more for their cinch sponsorshiup than the entire spl does.

@@asensibleyoungman2978 would be us doing you a favour wee man

Well, the population difference for one. England has about 12 times as many people as Scotland so there's about 12 times as much money available to clubs in England just from the pockets of fans and without TV money. The Old Firm is in a league where the other teams have much smaller fan bases and so the league itself is less attractive to TV companies and big name players. Imagine Manchester City being made to play in the Slovenia league, or some other small European country. Although they would regularly win the league and get into Europe do you think they would continue to attract the investment that they do currently? Over a few years their money would disappear and so would their high profile players. The Premier League teams need each other to maintain each others' attractiveness to big names and big investors, remove them from that league and they would quickly become middle of the road teams say like what happened to Leeds when they went from big spending, high flying, European contenders to near bankruptcy when they lost Premier League status. As for the charity bit , what do you mean? What would the English teams be giving away? Celtic's home average crowd competes with Man U and City and Arsenal. The only thing the Premier teams might give up is that over several years both Old Firm teams would establish themselves as competitors for the European spaces as the Big Six became the Big Eight and I think that is the main reason why the Scottish teams are not already in the English league.

​@@asensibleyoungman2978The English don't need to hand out charity by any means. The Scottish league was competitive before TV money ruined football. We have a worse TV deal than England due to a much smaller population and therefore less widespread appeal, compounded with Neil Doncaster, the head of the SPFL, being useless at negotiating TV deals.

Bro reading being in a relegation zone in league one

Hearts hold the Scottish record with 132 goals scored 29 conceded in Season 1957-58

leicester is going to break it 21-2-3

its just a matter of pride at that prevented this. Especially Scotland

I do not want a UK league. As all the Scottish trophies would be relegated to the status of non-league trophies. While all the EngIish trophies would seen as forerunners of the UK trophies. So Man Utd would be seen as having 20 titles, while Celtic, Rangers, and Aberdeen would be regarded as having won none. I would prefer a best of both worlds scenario. Where we keep our Scottish, Welsh, and English leagues. But on top of domestic and European football, we also have extra cross border cups with club sides from Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland, Ireland, England, North America and France. Cross border cups are the solution. The Scots already allow Welsh and Northern Irish sides in the Scottish Challenge Cup. Let's have 3 strong leagues in Great Britain, not one. I do not want the Scottish clubs to join the EPL, as everyone would think Scotland was in England.

@@rorysmith2415 fair points, hadn’t thought about that. Cups are definitely a good idea though!

It would ruin scottish football, the league has a old and rich history and all the rivalries would disappear if they moved to different leagues where they didn't play one another. Also, scottish fans would not be able to watch their teams on away days if they played in England as it would be more difficult and expensive. Finally, it would basically take away european football for clubs like celtic, rangers, hibs and aberdeen if they had to finish top of the prem instead of the SPL.

I would like to see scottish teams compete in the fa cup at least

I tried this on my own it’s so much fun would love to see it

So the super league?

Maybe even form a 2nd league, with good clubs outside top 20.

@@stupiditiusmaximus That might take a bit to create but here's my final proposal: English Premier League teams: Chelsea, Arsenal, Tottenham, Man City, Man Utd, Liverpool, Barcelona, Real Madrid, Atletico, Sevilla, Bayern, Dortmund, PSG, Juventus, Inter Milan, AC Milan, Napoli, Porto, Benfica, Ajax Championship: Newcastle, Brighton, Aston Villa, West Ham, Leicester City, Sociedad, Blibao, Betis, Valencia, Leverkusen, Leipzig, Union Berlin, Frankfurt, Gladbach, AS Roma, Fiorentina, Lazio, Sporting CP, Braga, PSV, Feyenoord, Lyon, Monaco, Marseille EFL League one: Remaining Premier League teams (Everton, Forest, Palace, Luton, Sheff Utd, Burnley, Brentford, Fulham, Bournemouth) + Championship teams with previous presence in PL (Southampton, West Brom, Blackburn, Watford, Sunderland, etc) So basically form the top 2 leagues and replace League 1 and League 2 sides with decent English sides that have been left out (You can even include likes of Celtic, Rangers, etc) Finally see who will win PL, FA Cup, Carabao Cup, CL for 10 seasons .... This will be epic!

@@KooshaJaferianmy guy rangers and Celtic deserve to be in the championship tier with those other teams

Ty mate!!

Yawn 🥱

I’m true but say that club footy should be back

.

Average 9 year old beggars

Average npc comment 💀

@@user-pj1rc7ec3z can u tell

Celtic's average home crowd. 🤣 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/os1-gNGruLy5gHk.html

When phase 2 is completed this year, Anfield will be bigger than celtic Park. The Emirates is already bigger. If Rangers and Celtic already have bigger fanbases, where are they and why aren't they generating money in the SPL? Your imaginary fanbases are just sitting on their wallets waiting for the English to hand out charity are they?

its a literal simulation this means absolutely nothing 🤣

YEAH

Bro thanks for spoiling the entire video…

?

This aged well

@@Themancitysupporter2096 aged like arsenal winning the league last season💀

@@DonnyGamerYT Arsenal banter club

@@noelto2681 lol

Great idea!

The Championship doesn’t count mate lol. Im talking about top division trophies.

@@TsarbucksFC There are many part time football clubs that are rightfully very proud of winning their league and getting a 🏆

Wit you supported rivals spurs and arsenal wtf

Yea I know wierd

I like them both because my dad likes totanham my family likes özil and so I like arsenal

Cant put 28 clubs into 1 league unfortunately max is 24

@@TsarbucksFC oh ok. I love your videos man

Oooh interesting

Probably hearts because they seem to always win it even in normal career

yeah@@CappyXS were the best team in scotland UP THE JAMBOS

@@LiamLikesKZfaq Not me being a Motherwell fan :/

@@CappyXS If Celtic we’re gone I’d say Motherwell could win the league

@@warioplays2260 in real life probs but in EA FC somehow hearts always win in like the first 2 seasons

Ayyyyy

If Rangers and Celtic left the Scottish system then unfortunately most clubs in the Scottish prem would probably collapse. Those teams rely on playing Celtic and Rangers each season, it literally keeps them afloat tbh. For instance when Rangers/Celtic play away from home in the league their fans get about 80%-90% of the stadium, it's pretty much a home game so the clubs get a decent pay day compared to a normal match day when about 20% of the stadium would be filled.

Why would the chances of them being relegated be 'very unlikely'? Leeds went down, Everton almost went down, Newcastle almost went down a few seasons ago. You need to completely forget Rangers and Celtic's success in Scotland because it would mean nothing in England. Being dominant in the SPL and going into the prem is like a couple of welterweights beating up flyweights and then going into the heavyweight division. Celtic & rangers would never see Europe or silverware ever again, especially Rangers.

@@WetLettuce-kc2qmEspecially rangers 🫣 Rangers been to 2 European finals in the last 15 years mate 😂 For a team in the Scottish league that's unbelievable, It's Celtic who can't buy a win in europe? As for Celtic n Rangers couldn't compete in England well you are way off the mark. Rangers and Celtic have a fan base bigger than most English teams and IF they did manage to play in England and get the riches that come with that then trust me Rangers and Celtic would 100% hold their own in England. The fact that in Scotland teams make literally no money compared to in England and yet Rangers still manage to reach 2 european finals in the last 15 years (Celtic also reached a european final in 2003) is madness. So you need to imagine what they could do if they had the money that goes with playing in England. Reaching European finals isn't easy but the fact both Rangers and Celtic have done it 3 times in 20 years on a shoe string budget compared to the teams they beat along the way gives you a hint of what they could do if they were getting the cash that English teams get. Celtic beat Blackburn and Liverpool on the way to the final in 2003 btw (both English premier league teams at the time) Rangers battered Dortmund on way to final couple of years ago and they had the likes of Bellingham in their team, Only lost in a penalty shoot out in the final. Newcastle have just lost to Dortmund twice, yes it's 2 years down the line but it gives you an idea.

@@bonnetdedouche 'For a team from the Scottish league that's unbelievable.' Thank you! You've just proven the point that Scottish clubs are tiny.

@@bonnetdedouche Have you ever asked yourself why Celtic and Rangers don't have the money the big prem clubs get? It's called market forces. Sky & rich investors dont invest because they know there isnt a big enough market for a return from those two clubs. If Celtic and rangers are big clubs, Sky and oil magnets would be all over you. they'd be pumping millions in to recoup billions but they don't because you dont have the global fanbase to generate that sort of return. celtic played Sydney in Australia and no one turned up to watch. Thats where you are on a global scale. Meanwhile Liverpool played in Australia in front of a 100k crowd that was all red. Cherry picking a few wins in Europe means nothing. Donetsk just beat Barcelona, using your logic that makes them a club as big as Barcelona. The Lincoln red Imps beat celtic. using your logic that makes them as big or bigger than celtic. You clearly don't understand how football works. Toulose just beat Liverpool. Using your logic that puts them on an even keel with 14 times European trophy winners Liverpool. Your argument is childish and naive.

Independance 9 out of 10 cant even spell the word the scottish national party has been found out as cheats ie missing cash

Thanks I figured out myself

We could possibly do that in another video!

@@TsarbucksFC you have raised your point so I'm going to raise my point the Scottish Premiership is a major trophy Celtic and Rangers are Scottish clubs Glasgow to be exact and nutrition is probably kept track of the Scottish Premiership and Scottish Cup

That's a myth. Celtic & Rangers fans grossly exaggerate their fanbase. Celtic played Sydney in Australia and the ground was virtually empty. They played Wolves in Dublin (Celtic's supposedly spiritual home land) and the stadium was only half full. Celtic Park is always full of empty seats & sky aren't interested in Celtic or Rangers because there isn't a global audience for them. What you're actually saying is Celtic & Rangers need the English to make them into big clubs. They can't do it without the English.

Biggest clubs in the UK is size order: 1) Man Utd 2) Liverpool 3) Arsenal 4) Spurs 5) Chelsea 6) Aston Villa 7) Man City 8) Newcastle Utd 9) West Ham 10) Celtic 11) Everton 12) Leeds Utd 13) Nottingham Forest 14) Rangers

@@johntate5050 That's money not size of support, West Ham, City, Chelsea Villa, Spurs, Everton, Leeds, and Forest all have smaller supports than Rangers and Celtic. Who were Man City until that billionaire bought them? Nobodies, same with Chelsea. Man U, Liverpool, Arsenal, and Newcastle on the other hand are legit.

@@WetLettuce-kc2qm No, I'm saying we're already good when it comes to fanbase, we just want the TV money

@@Spr1ggan87 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/pLiCg9iJx5fYd4E.html This is the size of your global support. You played Sydney in Ange's back yard because the club thought it'd attract a sell-out crowd and look what happened. No one turned up. Interestingly when you played Everton down under the next game, the stadium was almost full. They obviously went to watch Everton not celtic

Exactly yet their fans think they'd be a top club in the prem. Absolutely delusional.

Never miss a Tsar video

No surprise there pal

@@SAFCbestclub Can’t see Sunderland anywhere mate

That's the correct pronunciation, unfortunately for the Club the people that founded it were illiterate