It's more into the journey, but I think it would be helpful to to get a job market comparison. How good of a landscaper would Link be compared to a Deku, a Goron, and a Zora?

Well yes, but then you'd struggle to catch the crickets before they vanish, so it'd have to get a load more rice than the sword way to be worth it

@@gferrol118 Maybe. I think you could make a contraption that funnels them to you. Problem is this is a discussion that should have been in the video. I think looking up build ideas would be a pretty obvious thing to do for this video and it perplexes me that he didn't. It's not like they're hard to find. There's plenty of videos on them and they are touted as being good for rupee farming too. Are they? Say you're right that it's less efficient than doing it by hand, that would have made for an interesting upset! It would also be the crown jewel of the video to give Landscaper Link a legit lawnmower. Ideally it would be optimized, but I think that even just taking and crediting the lawnmower build with the most views and using that would have been fine. Could even have a cheeky joke in there like: "Hey, I'm dedicated, not creative." while showing his fucked up napalm mower burn itself up. Easy W.

And not generated very well

Is that a problem?

Link between worlds is amazing once you get the master sword

It’s called tears of the kingdom

@@megastarwarsrocks99 Or Link's Crossbow Training.

A funny video about a nonsensical idea does fine with a badly made AI-generated thumbnail.

​@@toumabyakuya I don't usually expect much from yt comments but listen to yourself, do you even know what you're talking about or are you just upset that someone rightfully criticized a content creator that you like on the internet

@@ineedahero1283 Okay, first and foremost: How rude. *"do you even know what you're talking about..."* I actually do. *"that someone rightfully criticized"* Rightfully? Rightfully?! Only way this could be "right" is if you truly believe that all your opinions are fact and that anybody that dares to disagree with you will always be wrong. Do you truly believe that your opinions are the only valid ones here?.

@@toumabyakuya A little bit of sass never hurt anyone, chill. I say rightfully because the use of AI here is disappointing and frankly wrong. Also you're putting your own words in my mouth and getting mad at them

@@ineedahero1283 *"A little bit of sass never hurt anyone, chill."* Dude, I simply don't like to be treated like this, especially from a complete stranger like you. *"I say rightfully because the use of AI here is disappointing and frankly wrong."* Disapointing? Maybe. Wrong? No. AI is a tool like any other and can be used as such. *"Also you're putting your own words in my mouth"* I am not. How could I do that when I am quoting you first and I only reply to what I quoted?.

Meh, let those people hate him and go away, we are better of without them here. After all, if this is enough for them to go away, then they weren't really fans of him to begin with.

Nah, the thumbnail is fine, bro.

No, why? It works well enough.

@@toumabyakuya its AI generated crap

@@seksipommi_sephiroth Only because he didn't try hard enough to make a good one.

Because it fits the vibe of the video.

Nah, AI thumbnails are as good as human-made ones.

Whats wrong with using ai to aid in your peice of art its not like the whole video is made by ai just something cmeecraft isn't as skilled in

​@@A_Surpluss_of_Stupidity what's wrong with putting minimal effort in to steal art and have a robot try and attract viewers for you?

@@tdk7326 to answer the "minimal effort" question its called working smarter not harder why should anyone spend hours on something if they can do it in 5 minutes instead. To answer the "stealing" question it isn't stealing sure ai is trained on other art but have you heard of something called fair use before it means you can take others art if it is transformative and obviously an ai is transformative and the ai art is also within a larger transformative peice of art.

​@@tdk7326 That makes no sense.

@@jacobs5546it’s a proven fact backed by multiple studies, and new sites like the Newyorker, that all AI art softwares (unless you make it yourself and feed the it a pool of art that is entirely copywriter free) make their art off of stolen art found online, and actively takes and Frankensteins together real artists work. To use an AI art software for monetary gain is to literally steal the work from actual artists

With you 100% but...get used to it 😕

Nah, it is a W.

You AI haters are going to be the first to go in the AI Wars of 2033. I, for one, welcome our new AI overlords.

@@faithfultepig put me in the Contraption already

@@RobertF-zj2rm Man, you guys make no sense at all.

What are your problems with ai

@@A_Surpluss_of_Stupidity I’m going to assume this is a genuine question. It is a proven fact backed by multiple studies, and news sites like the Newyorker, that all AI art softwares (unless you make it yourself and feed the it a pool of art that is entirely copywriter free) make their “art” off of stolen art found online, and actively takes and Frankensteins together real artists work. To use an AI art software for monetary gain is to literally steal the work from actual artists

@@A_Surpluss_of_Stupidity Your name describes yourself perfectly.

@@A_Surpluss_of_Stupidity Honestly, a lot of people understimate how hard it can be to make a truly good image with AI.

Exactly most people are just spewing out out other people's opinions without actually thinking about what they are saying or if it makes any sense at all its idiotic

​@@A_Surpluss_of_StupidityI personally don't like ai, but I can overlook a one-time use of it. Def gonna notice if this becomes a trend tho.

@@NovaMaster375 Dude, AI is a tool like a pencil or a brush are. There are no differences here.

@@toumabyakuya "ai is a tool, like a pencil or a brush" How incredibly dull can someone be? That's like saying a magnum is a tool, just like a taser or pepper spray. I shouldn't have to explain how ai 'art' generators are trained, or the many allegations against groups who develop them.

@@NovaMaster375 *"How incredibly dull can someone be?"* I don't know, you tell me why *you* are this dull. *"That's like saying a magnum is a tool, just like a taser or pepper spray."* Yup, they are just that, tools. They cannot be wrong by themselves, they can only be used in a wrong way bu us humans. I mean, kitchen knives and scissors have been used in murders prior, should all of them be destroyed as well?.

And what if he cannot get a comm? And what if simply using screencaps wouldn't be enough? Should he then give up a video idea sorely because there's no way for him to make a good thumbnail without AI?.

How good I will defend him then. After all, people like you exaggerate a lot about AI.

​@@toumabyakuyaaww here comes the person to literally prove their point. lashing out at every comment that even remotely dislikes people using this AI nonsense instead of spending 20 seconds in photoshop or five bucks to get an actual human person to doodle something.

@@3possumsinatrenchcoat *"here comes the person to literally prove their point. lashing out at every comment that even remotely dislikes people using this AI nonsense"* Dude, you are being, right here and right now, one of those rude persons I vowed to fight. You literally respect nobody else's opinion but your own. *"instead of spending 20 seconds in photoshop"* For a pic that would be half as good as this one already is?. *"or five bucks to get an actual human person to doodle something."* Maybe, just maybe, he simply couldn't afford it.

looks like you got called out on it before even posting the video and went ahead with it anyway. guess I'm unsubscribing then ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

@@3possumsinatrenchcoat How petty.

What's wrong with AI generated thumbnails?

@@jacobs5546I’m going to assume this is a genuine question. It is a proven fact backed by multiple studies, and news sites like the Newyorker, that all AI art softwares (unless you make it yourself and feed the it a pool of art that is entirely copywriter free) make their “art” off of stolen art found online, and actively takes and Frankensteins together real artists work. To use an AI art software for monetary gain is to literally steal the work from actual artists

Both your name and your PFP adds so much context to your comment Not in a good way tho

@@jacobs5546 stealing work is not good imo

@@adv78 at least I have integrity, hope you can get some next time 🙏🙏🙏

Wait did he actually address it?

Cy@

Dude, if this was enough for you to unsub, then you never were a true fan of his to begin with.

That is such an overreaction that I would be embarrassed to have you as a fan if I were him and I don’t even like ai thumbnails at all. It just shows you never even cared if such a small thing that does not even show him contents quality can ruin it for you that much. Honestly, pathetic.

Good.

Man, you are being petty now.

1.-) Not everybody can pay others to make a thumbnail for them. 2.-) Not everybody can draw either. 3.-) AI-Art is as much theft as fan-art would be.

@@toumabyakuya are you dense? CMee never had a problem creating his own thumbnail. If you can't use Paint or Gimp to make a quick edit, then sure as hell you can't make quality video and should stick with screenshoot/photo + text format Also AI *is* stealing art. During first waves of neo-AI art, top "targeted" artists with watermark or signature had those stolen. AI tried (and failed) to apply those in places and shapes specific for each artist. Let's say you always put your name with heart under characters elbow. If fed enough of your art, AI would try to put squiggles and heart-like shape under its elbow as well. It is this blatant and disgusting. If you ever see weird blob, lines or random letters, know that it's someones signature (and art) stolen

@@OnlyTAS Man, this is the most dense I have seen somebody be. *"CMee never had a problem creating his own thumbnail."* Mostly because all his prior videos were fine with using either official artwork (and that is, in a way, him stealing as well) or by using screencaps (this could also be seen as him stealing). *"then sure as hell you can't make quality video"* What does this have to do with anything?!. You do know that making a thumbnail and a fun video are two different things that require two different skillsets, right?. You are just hating on him because he dared to use AI. *"and should stick with screenshoot/photo + text format"* What if that didn't make a good a thumbnail as AI could?. *"During first waves of neo-AI art, top "targeted" artists with watermark or signature had those stolen."* By the way, those artist you care about so much also stole art as well, after all, I highly doubt even one of them asked for permission from the rightful owners they were making fan-art from to make said fan-art. Honestly, the arguments you are making right now could also be used against fan-art itself, after all, both of those commit the same "mistake": Using somebody else's product as a basis (or as materials) to create a fully different final product without asking for permission first. Also, the only way for AI to make an image similar as somebody else's is by telling the AI to make an image similar to the one that it is being feed. Otherwise, the AI will use the feed image sorely to recognize patterns but will make a final product that is highly different from every image it was feed to make said product.

@@toumabyakuya but you know I never started the fanart topic, don't you? And yet you keep going on, and on, and on... It tells me all I have to know about you. About your fanatism with this sick technology. Also your lack of creative skills, but that's to be known from your passion towards stealing others art. Please, grow up and be better :)