Your vlogs are most waited man feels good to get a 30min one. Brutal one but that’s the only way to go back at the tables stronger amigo ! good luck 🙏

You don't have 34% on the turn with 88. The graphics are based on knowing what hole cards were folded preflop. You have 10 outs out of 44 cards to boat up if your opponent has a straight. 3 jacks to maybe tie. 11.5/44 does not equal 34%.

maybe you and trooper97 can have a heads up match, that would be thrilling

The Luke Schwartz follow was even better! 😂😂😂

Wtf you talkin bout? Timestamp chumpy

Agreed. That was epic.

Yup that was great. Thanks for putting yourself out there Andrew!

No Andrew made a bad bet. When you're playing at a higher stake you don't normally play at, you've got to play ABC poker. Your priority is to make money and not to show how great of a poker player you are by bluffing your bankroll away because for dudes who normally play these higher stakes are used to calling off huge bluff with As high. When I play 25/50 PLO at Borgata vs playing 5/10 PLO that I normally play I refrain from trying to pull off big bluff that I normally would do at 5/10. Andrew play was motivated by Livestreaming not is usual tempered style off play. After he got called he got gun shy and checked AK down to the river.

​@@godfreyojeator999 I think overall this was a +EV bet. It just happens to come along with higher variance and that does need to come into consideration when a player is moving up in stakes and maybe doesn't have the bankroll to support the higher variance. But, the bankroll discussion is a matter of personal risk tolerance. It doesn't mean the bet was bad when viewed in a vacuum. For example, if I were bankrolling Andrew, I would love to see plays like this. It was a highly advanced play. We all laugh about the unsubscribe from Polk's channel. But the fact that Polk had a video discussing this exact spot and recommending a balanced bluff range under these circumstances does support that view point.

@@godfreyojeator999 plus that skydiver villain seems like a calling station when he has something higher than a pair so he doesn't seem like a good player to bluff.

@@godfreyojeator999 my man said he plays 25/50 PLO😂😂😂😂

😅

Fairly accurate description too 😂😂

This is the turning point

He is also going to want to go super polar with his Full House/bluffs. I think for this to work a shove is the right move. Yes maybe you still call it off, but the all in is going to look stronger. With the raise he made you only had to be right about 26% of the time which I'm sure almost all flushes will call that.

@@codywalker256 also watching him, (I don't know how long he actually took) but it seemed like much longer and his body language was much less strong during the bluff vs the FH he hit with the 8's. If he took a similar amount of time with less movement and shoved to polarize its possible it works.

Nh Scott and please don’t waste your time watching my dumb videos! Gg man. 👊🏼

Yeah, unfortunately neeme bluffed a fish. If it was vs a pro we'd at least get the tank.

The snap was terrible. He bluffed the wrong guy for sure. Dude called down everything that night.

@@jcw8955 thanks for your help. Spell check actually did that and I didn’t feel like changing it. I didn’t know English teachers played poker 😂

He 9x with AA... that tells you enough

@@sojlad lol truth

Really been diggin your vlogs since I finally started watching earlier this year, Mariano. Keep it up!

OMG!!! Baahhaahhaa

@NightWi5h: same

I’m dead. 🤣😂💀

Comedy gold!

And following Luke Schwartz instead! Amazing.

Not understanding these guys don't fold ANY minimal value is terrible play. It's virtually impossible repping the running trips even vs most fish, I see no one folding any pair above 66/77. He donked hard in this session and rightly went busto..

I will say that the ship on the two pair hand to rep a boat was super high level. Just sucks that the other guy was just ready to pull the trigger no matter what given he was pot committed. This is why it may be better to nit it up at low- to mid-level stakes given that players are just a lot looser with their range and ready to commit.

I like the flop flat, on the river you have to look at what hands V is supposed to fold, is V ever folding a str8 because I would be the equilibrium has him folding some. Skydiver may not even fold a T so trying a bluff that is good against a perfect V is not so great against a player that is massively going to overcall this river...with that said his flush has the deuce in in so does block some flopped 22s...

These games are soft. His baby flush isn't even a value bet on the river lol. He bet raised PF bet mw, barreled turn and board paired on the river. Andrew is never calling a worse hand on the river.

100%, his bluff was good from a theory standpoint and might work against the GTO robots at the bellagio, but he needs to think more about his specific opponent. A fishy gambler player is never going to fold a flush for another 3k on the river. Only possible sizing that would have worked was all in, but even that seems unlikely given the snap call.

Aw the guy was a whale. Snap called.

I think the bluff was right, but the sizing allows him to call a lot and only needs to be right on occasion. Also, the sizing in the value re raise with 88 in a similar spot was smaller. If both were shoves, it would reduce their odds on calling. If you had value 60% of the time or so in this spot (calculated by combos), he’d be indifferent between calling and folding. It’s therefore a winning shove even if he snaps you off. In short, the sizing was the issue. By doing too small a size, you allow his call happy tendencies to actually be the correct play.

Andrew’s reraise was too small, IMO.

I'm not an expert but I like to play ...... this guy is a beast ! ! !

We do that all the time at home games is it not allowed in professional poker games

@@powerlifting1012 At most casinos I have played at, you (anyone dealt into the hand, whether or not still in it) can ask for a "show one, show all" ruling, and the floor will have the dealer protect the muck, so that when the player folds, the dealer touches the muck with the cards but keeps them separate. Then at the end of the hand, they get shown to everyone. I've seen this several times. Depending upon the casino, floor person, and shift manager, both players might be warned against doing it again, with various consequences threatened. Or if they've ever done it before, even weeks ago, they might be shown the door for a day, month, or permanently. I've seen this also, for this or similar infractions. One time, two friends who did it were permanently banned from ever playing at the same table again at that casino. Separately, one or both might be declared in violation of "one player to a hand" and the hand killed on the spot, especially if there is ANY suspicion of chatter, signaling, speaking a foreign language after looking, or even slightly reacting with a tell after looking at the cards. I've never seen anyone banned for showing cards to another folded player, but I play in places with solidly enforced rules, where no pro or regular would do something like that, except in low-pressure, low-stake situations where nobody is going to ask for anything more than a warning to them. And they'd absolutely never do it after a warning, so you could really only get away with it for one hand if anyone at the table cares at all, or if the dealer is strict. VERY bad form, in any case.

IV:XX

I did think that was some foresight of things to come...

Not amazing. Physical tell. For the most part Andrew kept poker face. This time he "put on his business face". Act of strength. No way he does this with a boat or flush. Trips at best and Skydiver not playing 42h to fold turned flushes when board comes running pair..