Yes! And noticed how both trains stop and take off at exactly the same time. Great shot.

I’m SO proud of that clip lmaooo

You are right fun view

@@mrxman581 your name is familiar. Did you own a theme park server?

@@Commander-leo What is surprising?

@@realquadmooLA is not know for good public transportation

@@Commander-leo well I certainly don’t see why. I knew nothing about their transit before going down there and throwing myself on a train to downtown and I had such a blast and everything was so convenient. Did you know Metro fare caps EVERYTHING at $5 a day and $17 a week????

@@realquadmoodamnn thats really cheap love how Los Angeles is getting their shit together and making the city better hope they build more of this!!

@@realquadmoo17 a week

@@EastsideTransit LA’s light rail is similar to Link, but it streetruns a lot more. It has decent signal priority, though sometimes it’s a little slow, compared to Link where we don’t have very good preemption in Rainier Valley yet (but we do on BelRed). LA squeezes as much speed as they can out of the trains, speeding up as quick as they can only to have to slow down for a sharp curve right after, whereas Link tends to maintain a consistent speed when possible. Link slows down more for curves, LA goes fast through them all. The onboard announcements for Link are nice and simple, but LA has more information in them (except for the side of the doors). Link is fully an honor system, but on some stations, LA has turnstiles. Link is currently distance fares with no cap for riding again, though it’s soon to be flat fares and we hope it will be capped like T Line is, whereas in LA, Metro only lets you pay a maximum of $5 a day, and $17 a week, which is amazing. As for LA’s subway, it’s fully underground, much longer platforms, goes a lot faster, and overall it’s just magic, and I feel that it’s better than Link. When we up our frequencies and gain full signal preemption I think I might prefer Link to the subway, but I do slightly prefer Link over the light rails. I think there’s lessons to be learned for Link, though.

I don’t know what that means but I’d be interested in finding out 😅

@@TohaBgood2 yes and it’s great

I didn't know what "lfg" meant but I got the comments context and knew what it was. Anyways, LA should build more subways rather than light rail. Big fan of the former (dat timing I found this recommended so I could see how lrt is like and u replied just 27m ago for a 9hr old comment, so I could rpeply early.)

@@hnitsua yes I really like the subways, but it just boils down to trains in tunnels in my opinion, so I wouldn’t mind more subway lines, but if they build more light rail in tunnels, I’m fine with that

“Boils down to the trains in the tunnels”? Also Rmtransit made a vid abt not putting lrt in tunnels (more expensive infrastructure for lower capacity trains). They shouldn’t underestimate the capacity. Also elevated trains would b way better than tunneled ones too, but it's unfortunate nimbys miss the point that having a view from the air is awesome!. (25m ago, almost the same time as seeing your prev reply)

@@hnitsua I really don’t like RMTransit haha