Ian Paisley was a brave man and a source of inspiration for every evangelical reformed christian. Peace to his soul.May the Lord reward him as His true servant.
@rosemerrynmcmillan16112 жыл бұрын
Amen, well said!!
@sticklando4 жыл бұрын
This is what it sounds like when the genuine debate the disingenuous. Truth sounds like hate to those who hate truth. And the all too typical im offended routine ! God bless Ian Paisley !
@TheMasterWanker4 жыл бұрын
Amayn - such lies and twisting coming from his opponent.... I'm not even sure who he is, if he is a Priest or what, if so he should be given the boot ASAP.
@johnbull91953 жыл бұрын
Ian Paisley is one of my heroes.
@rosemerrynmcmillan16112 жыл бұрын
Hallelujah!! The MAN OF SIN IS REVEALED!! THE POPE OF ROME IS THE ANTICHRIST!!
@user-fq5kg6gk1gАй бұрын
Ian Paisley was a Warrior for Protestant Christians
@user-fq5kg6gk1gАй бұрын
The Bride 👰🏼♀️ of Christ is the True Pure Church ⛪️
@TheMasterWanker4 жыл бұрын
What book from Ian Paisley is talked about?
@user-fq5kg6gk1g2 ай бұрын
Ian Paisley is Speaking The Truth About The Church of Rome and The Pope
@michaelvallance37952 жыл бұрын
God bless Rev Paisley
@jamesbhollingsworth5452Ай бұрын
30:42
@user-fq5kg6gk1g2 ай бұрын
The Bible Calls The Church of Rome Mother of Harlots
@user-fq5kg6gk1g7 күн бұрын
The Church of Rome is the Whore of Babylon in Revelation 17
@aor32203 ай бұрын
"It is a fact that the Pope invented sin" Good lord what utter nonsense. As the other interviewee points out the Pope 'defined' sin, or gave his own interpretation of the gravest sins. Paisley was such a duplicitous speaker, constantly deliberately misinterpreting people and misquoting and removing context, 🙄
@francisboyle32716 жыл бұрын
The bible is absolutely full of inconsistitys. u can find anything you want in it. and interpretate it in anyway you want.
@rosemerrynmcmillan16112 жыл бұрын
You don't know what you're talking about.
@AbuHajarAlBugatti9 ай бұрын
Not really if you really atleast read it
@brianmgrim7 ай бұрын
@francisboyle3271: Since you approve of relative ‘interpretation’, I’ll interpret your comment to others that Francisboyle3271 said the bible has no inconsistencies, you are restricted to finding only what it contains, and that there is only one correct interpretation. How do you like those apples? What’s good for the goose is good for the gander. You like being misrepresented? God doesn’t like it either. (Edited for typos only).