IBM Quantum State of the Union 2022

No video

IBM Quantum State of the Union 2022

Рет қаралды 43,140

Жыл бұрын

An update on the IBM Quantum mission to bring useful quantum computing to the world, and to make the world quantum safe. Covering remarkable performance breakthroughs driven by software and hardware innovations, new system designs, roadmap updates, and much more. Led by Jay Gambetta, IBM Fellow and Vice President of IBM Quantum, and the IBM Quantum leadership team.
For more about the announcements made at the IBM Quantum Summit 2022: www.ibm.com/qu...

Пікірлер: 54

@charlievardar1330 Жыл бұрын

I'm not quite sure about the carbon capture, but you still have: 1) the pharmaceutical industry 2) total synthesis/pharma, especially when it comes to big-on-volume structures, like proteins (which is excellent timing of you guys with the m-RNAs structures just making baby steps into the world) 3) total synthesis/oil: not all plastics (more big molecules) are recyclable and not all petroleum products are being produced without gas emissions 4) Theoretic/Quantum physic 5) Theoretic/Quantum/Physical Chemistry and I suppose others, but I started writing this after watching just 2:38 minutes, so I'll just continue. It looks awesome 🤗

@rajeeshcm5938 Жыл бұрын

IBM is taking the lead on quantum computing, with this headstart you can expect them to dominate this field when quantum computing applications go commercial in the next 4-5 years.

@PullingEnterprises Жыл бұрын

4-5 is very optimistic but it could be

@Bootman899 Жыл бұрын

Maybe before C 19 but 4-5 years is far too close with our current supply chain situation. Set us back at least 2-3 years. Back to the original timeline - 2030 is the most realistic

@yuriakahumanity Жыл бұрын

4 years easily

@bobanmilisavljevic7857 Жыл бұрын

@@PullingEnterprises 🤠👍

@stevelam5898 Жыл бұрын

Amazing breakthroughs on so many levels, the world will come to realize their importance in the years to come.

@frikkied2638 Жыл бұрын

This is why IBM is great, their leadership are kind of awkward but highly skilled engineers, and not snakesin salesman.

@RealValkor Жыл бұрын

looking at you elon musk

@estring123 Жыл бұрын

@@RealValkor haha

@dertythegrower Жыл бұрын

Thank you for the showcase and speech 👍

@tijjaniyyavoluntarymedical1370 Жыл бұрын

Amazing IBM 🇳🇬👍

@rachaelcro Жыл бұрын

Great presentation

@pegkemmeka9400 Жыл бұрын

Very interesting video!!

@Handelsbilanzdefizit Жыл бұрын

Ok, seems impressive. But what most people want to know, show us practical use cases that can be done "now", and that can't be done classically. Thank you!

@rajeeshcm5938 Жыл бұрын

Well, Google has demonstrated quantum supremacy, but the problem is not of much practical significance.

@Handelsbilanzdefizit Жыл бұрын

@@rajeeshcm5938 From an " techradar" article: >>> Scientists say they've debunked Google’s quantum supremacy claims once and for all By Joel Khalili published August 05, 2022 New paper shows traditional hardware can match the performance of Google’s quantum computer

@cea6770 Жыл бұрын

There are no practical use cases, and won't be for decades. As for the basic quantum advantage demonstrations, the one done by Google was always on shaky ground. Boson sampling is much more concrete (exactly proven to not be done classically), although also not particularly useful.

@rajeeshcm5938 Жыл бұрын

@@cea6770 True, with the current state of the art, practical applications could take decades, unless there are any breakthroughs in dealing with decoherence or gate fidelities

@kevinmcfarlane2752 Жыл бұрын

I gather they have been able to use QC theory to improve some classical algorithms.

@almavesfeltaite Жыл бұрын

Outro is to loud, here i am sneaky listning in the night... Outro woke her up.

@jjgerald7877 Жыл бұрын

Hi, Jay Gambetta.. Jerry Chow..

@peterhagan8454 Жыл бұрын

maybe osprey can equally prove size does and does not matter

@bot3d Жыл бұрын

Can I compile using GNU Assembler ?

@patrickprakash8 Жыл бұрын

Yes

@codrinvechiu2832 Жыл бұрын

Can it run Crysis?

@reducedfaticecreamisjustde1447 Жыл бұрын

the real question here is: can it understand Crysis?

@MrFaceHead Жыл бұрын

Crysis runs you.

@reducedfaticecreamisjustde1447 Жыл бұрын

@@MrFaceHead only in Mother Russia

@god-manmeherbaba8576 Жыл бұрын

💕💕❤❤💘💘

@doug7180 Жыл бұрын

I mean that literally LUNATIC

@hussienalsafi1149 Жыл бұрын

🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠🤠😎😎😎😎😎😎😎

@doug7180 Жыл бұрын

This is what is wrong with the world. Corporations controlling food resources.

@reedsexton3973 Жыл бұрын

IBM controls food resources? Tell me more

@doug7180 Жыл бұрын

@reedsexton3973 All the corporations are fascist in the USA in lockstep together with government for community. I can not post comments. Because of the ignorance of the American people. Send more money to the nazi Ukraine regime. They fly the colors of the Ukrainian ss nazi's from ww2. 8000 stationed in Great Britain after ww2. Your highlighted comment is BS.

@doug7180 Жыл бұрын

@reedsexton3973 IBM HELP THE NAZI'S IN WW2. LOOK IT UP smart guy.

@reedsexton3973 Жыл бұрын

@@doug7180 what does that have to do with them controlling food resources in the present?

@doug7180 Жыл бұрын

@reedsexton3973 I think they have a relationship with Bill Gates. He has not bought some farmland. I don't want to answer you anymore. You can't think for yourself. You are running a Qbasic loop in your brain. Good luck.

@franzculetto5962 Жыл бұрын

Extrapolating from my experiences during the pandemic, the actual State of the Union 2022 can only be the minor part of truth: military grade processors having always been two or three generations ahead of the commercially available/useable ones, is suggesting that covert customers like Pentagon affiliates or NSA et al. for sure already are enjoying quantum supremacy to break all of the conventional encryption not yet broken via standard methods/technology ...

@plafar7887 Жыл бұрын

huh...no

@bananalord8575 Жыл бұрын

@@plafar7887 haha right? I love this way of thinking. Like the people at pentagon NSA are 100x smarter cuz they have military money. But IBM with their billions of investments and computer specialization dosen't... And like if the military had the tech some people wpuldn't want to get filthy rich by going comercial.

@LettersAndNumbers300 Жыл бұрын

I recently saw Sabine’s video claim this is all quite pointless

@maloxi1472 Жыл бұрын

She also acknowledged that she might be wrong. Just wait and observe 😉

@physicsowen Жыл бұрын

She explicitly says that big companies will be able to make a profit off of QC (“I have to disagree on the final point because big companies have another way to make money from quantum computers”) so not really sure how a source of income could be pointless for a business.

@rajeeshcm5938 Жыл бұрын

I expect quantum error correction and coherence times will improve in the next few years

@Kalumbatsch Жыл бұрын

The irony is that the quantum gravity stuff she gets paid for is orders of magnitude more pointless than this.

@LettersAndNumbers300 Жыл бұрын

@@Kalumbatsch tell her that to her face you coward.

@johnsprinkler5443 Жыл бұрын

You will never have an error free quantum computer. Therefore, this is incredibly wasteful of time, resources, and energy. Classical computers are the only way . sorry IBM! :)