Cop: “We KNOW what you’re doing. You’re just trying to get a reaction from us.” Also Cop: “We suspect you are dropping drugs.” Only in cop logic could someone claim that they suspect you of doing something even though they KNOW you are doing something else.

Well said.

Hi Jeff - Can you help team build the AmericaNeedsVoices Protest Website… Gaining traction but I’m setting up a conference call with some auditors like you to discuss.. Could you kindly assist a fellow Patriot in need?

LOL mentioning 4 million views scared the shit out of him.

@@interestedparty00 More so, did he try to get their attention to be arrested for dropping drugs? Bright officers here.

" the prison guards ( as in ,friends and family of the cops ) are the ones bringing "contraband" into the prison" - fixed that for ya :)

Very true. Also, they are supported by the CIA and FBI. They create the problem and force the solution. Corruption runs our government.

It's easier to score drugs in jail or prison than it is out on the streets.

@@Dirk_the_Daring I've also been told it's higher quality drug(s) in prisons, than the streets.

@@jenhol04 Cops ALWAYS have the best drugs.

A cursory Google search lmao…nice, Johnny.

Until you tender your oath of office and I can verify that through state records, I am going to presume that you are impersonating an officer and any attempt at arrest is actually kidnapping and I will defend myself accordingly. If you are an actual officer then you will know how to obtain a search warrant for any and all items/documents/property you wish to have under your control.

Oh, Johnny, just trust the badge. It's here to protect you

To be fair, *all* cops are criminals, it’s just that some are far worse than others…

Just obey bro, what’s wrong with you?

IKR? Since they already know what he is doing then they have no reason to want an ID. I love it that police just can't stop talking lol

They are addicted to ID.

It just like when a Cop says "I support the Second Amendment, I have 2 personal AR-15's, and a small Handgun Collection, But...." which means everything they said prior to the 'but' is meaningless.

Which is why you should never talk too much. You end up saying stupid stuff.

Yeah, "I totally respect what you´re doing" and though I want to run your datas through our database for no reason what Jeff appreciates with "stay safe, officer" at the end.

Notice when that happened. Jeff mentioned a 4 million view video right before the officer proclaimed his respect and ran..

You took the words out of my Mouth. If he respected what Jeff does he wouldnt have given him SH!t for having a KZfaq channel. A Channel that just mearly tries to educate both We the Poeple AND Public Servants alike!

"I respect what youre doing" BULLSH!T!! You just insulted the crap out of him and characterized his actions with presumptive accusations! What a POS!

"...you're just trying to get a negative reaction" lol good job fulfilling your own prophecy bruh

But you have to give credit that they tried, and then ultimately relented. They didn’t try arresting him at any point and didn’t force any detention. They’re allowed to ask and ask and ask, and try to give reasons why he should identify himself, but they weren’t foolish enough to cross the line. I’d give them a A-.

They know, they dont care because they get away with it.

@@davidswanson5669 Just insulted the guy a bunch and accused him baselessly of committing crimes.

@@chrisd2p2 yeah the cop gets a D for not being a decent human being.

His attitude sure changed when Jeff said four million views.

Copsplaining.

You should not trust police at all to begin with. They are trained to lie and manipulate you. Whenever police officer is talking to you, he has only one goal - to build probable cause for your arrest - even when he is talking about the weather. And it's not because he is somehow bad or corrupt - it's actually his job, like it or not.

@@vadr1651 The most common manipulation I have seen, even on the pro cop tv shows, is to mischaracterize what someone has said in an attempt to get them to agree with that mischaracterizations or incriminate themselves by defending against it. That is why most people shouldn't talk to cops.

Cop: “We KNOW what you’re doing. You’re just trying to get a reaction from us.” Also Cop: “We suspect you are dropping drugs.” Only in cop logic could someone claim that they suspect you of doing something even though they KNOW you are doing something else.

You can ASK for a persons ID in a casual encounter, if they refuse you can not Demand it.

hey maybe they don't know it

cops need that hit of crack I.D. lol!

​@@shaystern2453Oh they absolutely know; they just don't care. That's because they're so used to the average citizen; who are oblivious to the rights afforded to them by the US Constitution, just giving up their 4th amendment right whenever they ask.

The very essence of your rights and the reason they exist is to protect you from the government. Accordingly, the government is supposed and expected to overcome them. If it did not, these rights wouldn't even exist. This is what every government agent is doing, it's literally his job, and he is trained and expected to do it.

"I respect what youre doing" BULLSH!T!! You just insulted the crap out of him and characterized his actions with presumptive accusations! What a POS!

This is a porn site and has been reported.

Eveline, your porn site has been reported

There's no crimes here. Thanks for stopping by.

The big part of that is "RESPECTING THE LAW" which is something a large multitude of LE do NOT do. The reason they don't do it is because they are too lazy, stupid and ignorant. They are ignorant because they are too lazy to look it up and too stupid to understand it.

Agreed. It bugs me when auditors wish cops well or say "stay safe out there" right after being unconstitutionally violated by the same cop whether successfully or partially. The cop needs to drive away with a sense they were in the wrong and a well-wisher is like telling them they did the public interaction properly.

Yeah, you could tell that the coproach was really thinking that he's just antagonizing. They don't respect auditors. Notice how he doesn't say anything bad about the coproaches running the stop sign but wants to be sure that Jeff highlights the ones that do stop, lol. They will never get it, that if you turn a blind eye to your bad cop public servants you're just as bad.

The other BS was if someone drops something near the road, who in the fk is taking it into the prison? The ones running the stop sign likely.

@@macpat6458 The perfect example of how there are no good cops. The only exceptions are the ones on their way to being fired for having a conscience and acting on it.

Yep and notice he said that and his whole demeiner changed once he let him know that one of his videos has 4 million views

Exactly. He should have been told that. Or something like that. "Officer, if you respect what I'm doing here, then please 'show' that respect and stop trying to violate my rights by telling me I have to I.D.

My thoughts too. SMALL TOWN?! We're watching from EVERYWHERE...

Why blame the mum????

I always find it amusing when the cops complain about being baited or it being a trap. They are apparently too stupid to realize what that says about them. Hunters and fishermen use traps and bait to catch animals dumb enough to take the bait or fall into the trap. The cops are essentially admitting that they are like dumb animals.

Kinda giving the wrong impression there, mate. He's asking for ID, which is legal. If he were demanding ID under the threat of arrest, or detaining Jeff, THAT would be unlawful. Up to that bright line standard, it is not unlawful, only unjustified. He's being an ass, but that's not unlawful.

Little Johnny: “Teacher why did you GIVE me an F on my report card? “ Teacher: “Johnny I didn’t give you an F, you earned it!” Same with the cops. They earn the bad press. The auditors just happen to be there to record it.

@@somebodyelse6673 Maybe not unlawful, but definitely pushing it. It’s harassment to keep asking for something when someone has already said no. He told the woman the exact same thing, then she decides to have an officer continue in her place to try to shake him. The officer may not have been aggressive, but there was no real reason for him to be there other than to intimidate and run identification.

@@XJWill1 because none of them have clearly seen "Bait Car"

Well said 🤣🤣🤣🤣

😂😂😂😂😂😂 and if they can give me the lotto numbers winners

😂

I support auditors, but these cops got all they needed from him. His name, he's standing next to his plated car, his KZfaq channel, and he probably phoned in his mothers maiden name later that day.

@@thumbwiz right, but we get to see what shitheads they are. It might not be a fair trade, but the more people can see what awful people we have "policing", the better.

Agreed!

I hurt my neck from shaking my head so much. "I know exactly what you're doing, you want me to approach you." SO DON'T APPROACH ME!!

Baiting = not breaking the law so they can't arrest you

There is only 1 Jeff

Don't forget ad-hominem and strawman...

"I respect what youre doing" BULLSH!T!! You just insulted the crap out of him and characterized his actions with presumptive accusations! What a POS!

@@kidwave1 There are smart people in the audience after all.

Came to say this.

I disagree tbh, its better when he plays dumb. Once you bring up the constitution it totally changes the demeanor of the interaction.

I always think it's funny when they say "so you're baiting us". Like has no cop ever watched Bait Car? I bet my left arm that, when those dirtbags get pulled up, the cops never say to them "Yeah sure, we baited you. Off you go."

That's stupid to say. Never give cops scenarios that they can take seriously and use against you. No auditor is that good. Even lawyers know not to talk too much.

That's me.

Your right , without the camera I’m positive this would have been dragged on. Another reason to have a dash cam

Jeff is way beyond than Small town famous.

She was pissed. "How dare you disrespect my authority!!" I bet she would have loved to have shot him like that cop that shot that black guy.

oh I think the bouffant hairdo was pissed

Right? I mean the reaction from law enforcement is completely under their control--not his.

I am sure that Jeff is showing ignorant Leo's the same patience that he would have for a baby that poops its diapers.

"I respect what youre doing" BULLSH!T!! You just insulted the crap out of him and characterized his actions with presumptive accusations! What a POS! So, as per usual, hes FLICKING LYING!

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 okay that’s was pretty good

I believe she prefers to be referred to as Detective Castlebury.

Kiss my grits!

Hahahahahaha that bufont 1950's hair do is a "HAIR DONT"!!!!! 😂😂😂😂😂😂

​@@Agent_Starling that was low, going after the hair... but I can appreciate your enthusiasm and genuine nature.

Yup, that cop is a POS

"you have every right to record, I respect what you do"... except the actions of the officers says you can't and they don't...

He’s a total baby. Uneducated as usual.

I think they are just seeing if we're obedient, but even if so, they'd still want more and more. Hunting for arrests is all they know.

They have no suspicion, but the stop is their opportunity to do one more warrant check. "...to score more points, available from calls, hunt. This means searching for people to arrest by stopping cars and questioning people on the street. This approach seems haphazard, but it works. The reason is that most serious crimes are solved not by dogged detective work, but by street policing by a cop who stops someone suspicious and says, “Hey you, come over here! Got some ID?” That’s right. Merely by pulling over cars and stopping people on the street, police catch an astounding number of bad guys." (from the book "Arrest-Proof Yourself" by Dale Carson, 2007)

It won't. But its a matter of control.

Exactly! Maybe he's committed 50 crimes and they just haven't caught him for anything yet, so he wouldn't appear as a threat. Or maybe they're hoping somebody will have a similar name that is on their radar for something that they could arrest him for and pretend they didn't realize it was somebody else just to F with him.

I know right!

"They try so hard" Indeed. I would love to see their faces when they go back and tell their superiors that they couldn't get an I D, lol. "They" train them to use every trick/tactic in the book to be able to run the names. If everyone stood up for their rights you could put 60% or more of "their" coproaches out of a job.

Please see it from their perspective. It is very easy for the prisoners to quickly scamper out to the road and pick up drugs then sneak right back into their cells and get high.

@@donaldramey1896 ∆ Funny Stuff

The police came to my home with about 10 officers and as I casually walked outside to see what the commotion was 3 cops pointed their guns in my face. They said they got a call that I was armed and dangerous. I was not armed and was completely calm and passive. The cops then entered my home without a warrant and seized my property which included a 12 gauge shotgun. They then lied entirely about the incident in their report using quadruple hearsay and not including the names of the officers that entered my home. They also said I gave them my property also not true. They omitted that they had 3 guns pointed at me. I was not arrested and I have no criminal history. They violated both my 2nd and 4th amendments. The cops had my mother a witness to their crimes murdered for later attempting to press charges against them. The supervising officer was Sargeant Oscar Rivera of the Wethersfield Police Department in CT. These cops are now commanding cyber stalkers to censor my comments exposing them. +1 860-721-2900 Wethersfield Police # m.facebook.com/wethersfieldCTPD

@@donaldramey1896 don't you love the irony that no matter WHERE in the world the auditor is....that there is always some illicit activity in that exact area which makes the filming suspicious...😂.

They cover it…with bullet holes as they use it for target practice at the gun range where 95% of their training takes place.

Most subjects cover only their own self-preservation. A handful hours about laws and here you go as fresh-made Blue ISIS member.

I think it is skipped over. They don't want officers to know the people have rights.

Yeah good old Jeff has been at this for a long time....

San Joaquin - Olease see my note to Honor. Are you in for a confeeence call regarding my new Protest Site - ‘AmericaNeedsVoices’ as a Fellow Patriot Humbly Asking For Your Assistance. Thank you Both for your ongoing Service!

You forgot one. !

Fighting????

@@davidmcgrath6507 Yes fighting the system figuratively and when a person puts themselves in a situation where they know there is a good chance they will be hurt or killed and will have to fight for their life,especially by a opponent that is much bigger than them is a freaking fighter.

False. Very often there are what are called Trustees that work on the outside of the prison. That is actually a common occurrence that people leave contraband along the perimeter and trustees etc pick it up. Although prison staff bringing contraband in is a big problem, they generally don't pick up stuff left along the outside perimeter.

They want credit for stuff they’re supposed to do.

I would have liked to see Jeff respond with, "When cops are out on the road targeting speeders, do they give rewards to the motorists who are obeying the speed limit?"

Without having a You Tube Channel (Audience) then his conduct in filming in public WOULD NOT be Constitutionally Protected. If you want to argue that one, Google US Supreme Court and public photography and you will find the ONLY case the SC has ruled on concerning Public Photography where they RULED AGAINST THE PHOTOGRAPHER.

@@HUBABUBA-il8fn......No one needs a channel nor an audience to video the cops/Public Officials at work, per 11th District Federal Court, Smith vs City of Cumming. SCOTUS has already Ruled video in Public is a RIGHT (no channel/audience needed) and anything one can see from Public is legal. One cannot make a RIGHT illegal.

@@snafubar5491 Partially False. Let's Start with SCOTUS. The SC has only ruled on one case involving Photography in public, which is the closest case they have rule on to public video/filming, and they established two basic criteria for your content to gain F/A protection. Basically it is that you have a message of interest and an audience to receive it. They actually ruled against the plaintiff saying there was NO General First Amendment Right to take photos in public. It may not be illegal, but the First Amendment does NOT attach merely because you have a camera. Now as far as Smith V Cumming, yes the 11th US Circuit ruled, which is often generalized more than the specifics ruled on, that we have a First Amendment Right to record the Police in the performance of their duties when they ARE OUT in public. When the SC, or CCoA makes a ruling it is supposed to be specific to the case decided on. Now this decision has been misconstrued to encompass people thinking they have a right to record any governmental employee in any governmental building (publicly owned building), and not only doesn't that ruling establish that right, the very 11th Circuit has subsequent rulings that actually contradict that misinterpretation. Merely because a building is owned by thge government (public) does not grant the right of public access for whatever purpose they want. The Government, just like a private landlord has the right to retain the use of their property to it's intended purpose. You can read "Sheets VS City of Punta Gorda, and you can read the references made to those 11th Cir court decisions and others, in the case which decided that The City of Punta Gorda's ordinance prohibiting the recording of city employees without their permission in City Hall was legal and Constitutional. This was decided by a FEDERAL District Ct Judge that sits in the 11TH Circuit.

@@HUBABUBA-il8fn.......Partially False is like being alittlebit pregnant. Photography is not video, per se, and there is the Letter of the Law and Sprit of the Law. What isn't forbidden, is allowed. The 'interest' is my own and I am the 'audience', problem solved. If it is not illegal, means it is not against the Law, now is it??? Huff-n-puff all you want. I noticed you are taking some leaps Superman/woman would be jealous of. Just as one cannot be trespassed from Public just because some folks feelings are hurt, is not a Law, but a misinterpretation and a very broad one at that. If what you say is true, why are Auditors winning lawsuits for being illegally arrested for filming and/or trespassed in Public Buildings??? It ain't because the Govt is warm and fuzzy, now is it??? Even Dept of Homeland Security put out a memo saying filming in Public Areas IS Legal, and can bet your bottom dollar if it was illegal, they'd be all over that like turd-rolling bugs on fresh sheeit......but they aren't. Must be Legal, then......no???

You can ASK for id in a consensual encounter without it being an Investigative Detention/Terry Stop.

Jeff is an amazing auditor. My #1 favorite.

@@HUBABUBA-il8fn The officer can ask and the citizen can decline that request. Civil liberties are a beautiful thing.

HAR!