Bloodless revolution, wonder how long he survived to see how wrong he was.

I'm just wondering why you chose such a biased person to represent this period. Everything he writes is a narrative bending to a certain perspective of this time.

You should specify this is about the February revolution, not the bolshevik revolution

The tragedy is that todays left knows f all about the horrors of Marxism. They have zero concept of how much worse it was for the Russian people than the Tsarist Empire. My mother’s side of the family is from Poland and were interned in Soviet concentration camps. They don’t even have the slightest clue that Rothschild hired his third cousin, Levy Herschel Moredecai, paying him through his brand new toy, the World zionist Congress to write his fake little “communist manifestos”. They only know and worship that p.o.s. through his “culturally appropriated, criminal alias: Karl Marx. They don’t know that Trotsky and Engles and many of the future Bolsheviks were likewise hired by that family of psychopaths and their Wall Street allies in the United States, like JP Morgan, the ultra racist zionist Jacob Schiff, and the Warburg hsiwej banking brothers. They have zero clue that the entire thing is a zioglobalist plan of the world’s wealthiest, to enslave humanity with their Great Reset and their New World Order. They are exactly what Stalin called bourgeoise poseur leftists LARPing as commies in his day: “useful idiots”.

What is so ironic is that all the people who were so happy for this revolution were subsequently placed under brutal conditions by the new regime... Russia lost so much that it never recovered...

@@timothycook4782 I once read "Diary of a nobody", which I was told was very boring - because the author was nobody special. In fact it was interesting, and insightful of everyday life for a lower middle class man of the time. We have a lot of writings about rich and poor lifestyles, the famous and infamous but those inbetween - not so much.

Just call it a Journal. Then you sound grown up and sophisticated.

Well ur diary will not affect anyone in right hands but in wrong hands it will devastate ur lives, so choose it carefully

@@BrettonFerguson the word 'diary' was acceptable by older people and many of our forebears who were less dumbed down than most people are today. Don't try and be a word snob.

@@angr3819 I think you are projecting your own feelings and experiences into this. I never said anything was wrong with the word diary. I only stated what I think is the truth. If you call it a Journal it is the same thing as a diary, but is viewed as more mature and acceptable simply by calling it by a different word. That is how it is, don't blame me for it being this way. There are thousands of words with the same meaning, but people view the meaning in a better light. It is why euphemisms exist. If I state that people are more likely to accept a thing if one uses a euphemism, that does not make me a word snob. If I had stated that a word is in fact superior, which I did not, that would be snobbish. Not that I care what you think. I'm on a planet inhabited by 99% retards, it's difficult not to be a snob.

absolutely, and the tsar that contemplated the guillotine got his head lopped off. do you think revolutions just happen because people are bored or malicious? they happen because of famine, governmental violence, corruption, etc. you don’t gain freedom by being a good peasant, you gain freedom by killing your master

Has a great parallel with modern groups known as “useful idiots” such as antifa and blm. History repeats itself and there is nothing new under the sun

That was so true! That same government ended up murdering tens of millions of their own people.

The revolutionary left tends to forget this

thats ok with me. Getting decapitated is better then starving to death.

It always is. Pretty much every modern revolution has seen this happening. Only exceptions are the fascist revolutions in the thirties and the american one, and there is argument about if those could even be called revolutions.

blm

@@saltedslug7954 nra

@@Mr10johnny10 hbo

Nitzsche hadn’t seen todays leftards. Both applies with them, the individuals, and the group. And it’s even a little worse than “insanity”, not religious… but… leaning towards “insanity with likely demonic possession”.

@@pauly260 kfc

Because of this revolution, over 100 million recorded deaths due to communism ensued during the rest of the 20th century. Yet the leftists want another go at communism and think they’ll get it right this time. The banality of evil

@@igotfriendsinlowplaces2971 preaching to the choir.

Wished for bloodless, ended up blood soaked through and through

It was obviously more attractive to the working people than the situation they had been put in by their corrupt government, bloodless or no.

@@McShag420 killed all those people with the desire to get rid of corruption and oppression. I think the irony makes it worse.

And should a revolution come, the same fate will befall them.

It speaks more of Sorokin's social cirle than of the actual situation in the country. The revolution started not with those snobs in their salons, but with mass desertions of soldiers and strikes. It was the people who bore the weight of that damned empire on their shoulders, who started the process with several rebellions.

@@Watashiwadeus yep 100%, the notion that it was some kind of plot by intellectuals is just propaganda. We only condemn the revolutions that didn't produce something exactly resembling Western countries, and act as if the people involved should have somehow known what would be produced instead. Russia was hardly a great place to live prior to the revolution, and the people were fighting to make their lives better. Despite all the horrors of post-revolutionary Russia, arguably their lives _did_ get better in many ways. At least for those who were still alive and not imprisoned.

@@monkeymox2544 Yeah but prior to the revolution Russia was the fastest developing nation in the world. Granted, it's because it heavily depended on agriculture but all suggested the quality of life was about to improve. Personally, I think all the blame that came after can be blamed on the communists. They wanted to install communism for the idea instead of the people. If only they weren't so self-righteous and ignorant maybe they would've done better than the tsar.

The young and strong usually want revolution, the old and tired rarely do

Stop hating against Russian civilians lol

@@FlamingBasketballClub Where do you see hate?

*Russia is a never ending tragedy.*

@@o.g.millennials Reread the comment 🤡

@@FlamingBasketballClub are you simple? How did you manage to get that from his comment 😂

I wonder what his face was when he found out? Or was it smashed in?

Absolutely no difference from today. Wild stuff

Except today it is both sides. I never liked the two party system here in America.

Possibly would of, anxiety attacks are a result of modern life. Mental weakness compared to this time period is astronomical.

@@twuandixon8675 Existential dread at the knowledge that dark times are coming. In the modern era sure, people get anxious over nonsense. That's not to say people of the past wouldn't have anxiety, albiet probably for better reasons.

@@twuandixon8675 I wouldn't say that being untraumatised is mental weakness.

@@twuandixon8675 what is survivorship bias my dude? Mental illness was waaay more prevalent in the days where treatment was nonexistent. It didn't show up in history books, because it's only a recent development that we stopped culling them or torturing them into incoherency in asylums.

how do you survive here and now? you must be a wreck of a basket case.

this sounds a lot like october revolution tho

If you watch the video accompanying the reader's voice, you will notice that the diary covers events from February 1917 to December 1917. So it basically covers both the February Revolution as well as the October Revolution.

that is so important it should have been established at the beginning of the vid. Thx for looking out.

@@sarahkoe1903 oh ok thx for clarifyin

@@daylightsavings7186 Its not

@Black Lesbian Poet oh, you mean the social instability in Russia due to the war in Ukraine, right?

@@victoroyervides6913 lol you can infer what he means and it isn't that.

@@Pragnantweggyboard then what is it? May I ask

@@victoroyervides6913 History repeats.

@@victoroyervides6913 Ukraine lost the current war and those who support either side are ignorant. Evil fighting evil. But I bet you support the current thing?

Please keep in mind that this was written 30 years after the fact, with very specific political goals. You can tell that this reads more like a structured political polemic than like an actual recounting of events. This point of view is from someone who has an inherent mistrust of the common understanding of the people. You can see this from the way he talks about "responsible government against the mob". In reality, the "mob" formed because the responsible government was more concerned with defending the property of the nobility and the bourgeoisie than with actually bringing to fruition the revolutionary goals of the February revolution. The October revolution was made necessary because of the inherent contradiction of the dual-power system arising out of the February revolution. In that system, you had on one hand the provisional government representing primarily the interests of the propertied classes. On the side of the soviets (the word soviet just means council- an accepted method of democratic organizing since the 1905 unrest), there was the majority of compromisers who likewise feared the abolishment of property rights, and the rapidly growing minority of the Bolshivics, who stood alone in the support of exclusively workers, soldiers, and farmers. They gained popular support only when it became apparent that the provisional government and the other factions within the soviet represented the bourgeoisie liberal revolution if the February days, not the masses who fought that revolution in the first place.

Extremely harrowing

@@Ashley-1917 but won’t new Russia need a court building? Congrats you’ve bought into exactly what created the death of millions of innocent people.

@@Ashley-1917 ​ Would you kindly substantiate your claim that the entirety of these diary excerpts were written 30 years after the revolution?

@@Ashley-1917 lmao

It's never worth reading anything on the lie machine of Wikipedia, you'd be best off trying to find an original copy.

@@mattmcintosh3939 incorrect

@@rktsnail no my friend you are incorrect, its a well known fact that Wikipedia is a Web of lies lol, anyone's allowed to change entries. Maybe it's a good starting point for research but I would do more and look in other places to find the truth of the matter.

@@mattmcintosh3939 it is not never worth reading if you take the time to figure out which parts are lies.

"Are you sure about that?"

@@calexander7495 You're right. This is all an illusion, made by Bill Gates and his fellow reptiloid man. Thank you for your comment!

There is no precedent for a nonviolent revolution. It has never happened.

Bloodless revolution doesn't even exist

I took it more as a statement of hope for the perilous future of the revolution, that it would stay that way, sadly he was wrong.

The revolution seemed futuristic and a step forward for average Russians but it ended up being an excuse to rob wealthy peasant. The NKVD liquidators were boiling peasants alive on baseless accusations and seizing their assets afterwards.

That's how almost all revolutions go. There have been very few examples where a revolution didn't descend into chaos and anarchy, with an even worse regime rising in its place. Especially so with "people's" revolutions, which are easily manipulated by another group of elites in the age of mass media. The Bolsheviks are a notable example of this, with much of the leadership being wealthy elitists themselves, manipulating the working class into doing their bidding. Even they were eventually subsumed by the monster that was Stalinism in the end, which further proves the point that there is always a greater monster waiting right outside the door in times of anarchy and strife.

It only seems out of controll if you are someone who wants to exert undue controll over the masses. This writer was a liberal, and feared that the revolution would actually recognize that to meet their goals, they would have to size property. They did.

@@Ashley-1917 yeah, that's what he was worried about. Not the fact that the German plants immediately started promoting more radicalization, violence and death and in order to overthrow the already revolutionary provisional government. It's especially obvious how much of a liberal he was in how he very clearly defended the government that started seizing property compared to the one that followed it.

@@Ashley-1917 ...and whose philosophy would lead to the gulags, and mass starvation. Big win for the people.

Action is what keeps you alive during chaos, the reason Lenin and the bolsheviks took power over the Duma and subsequently the white army is *because* they took action. Had they used “thoughts” over actions the reactionary movement would have stamped them out of existence. They won against almost insurmountable odds against a well-established monarchy would powerful friends around the world. Read up on the actual history of the revolution, I seriously doubt you have.

But we HAVE TO DO SOMETHING!!!

Interesting, a Muslim friend once told me that in Islam, it's considered a sin to "panic." Running around crazy without thinking is "haram" or a sin. A proper God-fearing Muslim must sit down and think through his/her problems logically to find a solution. People who panic or act without thinking are seen as a threat to the larger community.

@@juniorjames7076 That's a very sensible religious belief. I like it.

They didn’t overthrow an “evil government”… they killed an innocent family.

As an American teacher in Istanbul, Turkey from 2013 to 2015 I met many Turkish people descended from "White Russians" who escaped the Bolchevik revolution in 1917 by emigrating to Turkey, many remarried to local Turks, or became Muslim, or stayed Russian Orthodox but thier children married and integrated into Turkish society. So how fascinating it is that a German and Turkish family living side by side in a city like Frieberg, might both be descendants from the same Russian town?

@@juniorjames7076 "I love diversity" 😋😋😋

False and misinformation. USSR wasn't the best country, but it's way better than Russian empire.

Stalin had nothing to do with the Russian Revolution, and actually opposed it until it happened. His rule was symbolic of the revolution's ultimate failure to spread to the developed countries in which Stalin ensured would never happen.

@@BolshevikCarpetbagger1917 Whether he did or didn't have anything to do with the Revolution itself doesn't really matter to me. But, what he did to millions of Russian citizens rivals only Hitler.

you would have ignored him cus he isn't 6ft tall and rich

@@TsarOfRuss lol. I’m 5’8” and my hubby’s 5’3”. My mother is 6’1” & dad was 5’2”. And I support our family financially on a very small budget. I like people for the merit they have, not the costumes they ware. I am sorry people are not as accepting of you. It’s their loss!

Lovely, so you miss the old russian elite like that guy. I wonder what is goverment like in Russia today and what are they doing to Ukraine, hmmmmmmmmm...

@@robertkalinic335The word’s of the man from over 100 years ago are what I could have imagined myself thinking in his situation. This has nothing to do with current political affairs. I am disappointed in your judgment of people being based on station and ethnicity. This kind of thinking is limited because only superficial information is used in understanding a subject. Assuming someone’s good or bad based on their country of birth is a simplified justification for you to hate without having to think.

@@kariannecrysler640 You could just write nothing instead, you agree with him about his sympathy for russian elite and Russia today is ruled by oligarchs who also invaded Ukraine and treat their own people like shit. I cannot imagine you not crying about attacks on authority of such government.

With mere good intentions hell is proverbially paved

You are absolutely right. I don't think the early stages of any revolution ever calls for the senseless slaughter of others but whenever your goals meet resistance, your inhibitions gradually begin to fade over time. It all comes down to how much you want something and what you are willing to pay. If desperate and hungry enough, the senseless slaughter of your enemies always turns into a possibility. I really hope this doesn't happen in present day USA but I'm getting the same vibes from the libs. The "DUDE, FREE SHIT" campaign promises always wins over the masses of dumb people. Their absolute ignorance is growing everyday....

Look around you.

Are you from either US or Western Europe, my friend? If you are, you are about to experience it pretty soon

Revolutions are always expensive and paid for by rivers of blood. Anyone calling for revolution must be willing to not only pay this price but be willing to force others to pay it as well.

🤘

What a cool name

Russian wasn't doing that great before the revolution, man. That's why the revolution happened.

whats your religion?

What religion is this? I'm intrigued

I'm actually intrigued

It would have to be a religion that also mandates literacy.

Pastafarian?

Activists academics live in a “socially constructed” world. Their entire ideology is based off a theoretical.

If you think this revolution happened because an academic somewhere though revolution was 'interesting' you have failed miserably at understanding Russian history. This revolution was the result of countless festering issues for years least of all any academic anywhere doing so because he was bored.

In fact if you want to see revolutions largely engineered by intellectuals and the upper class you should look at the French and American revolutions first.

Nobody ever caused a revolution or killed millions of people because they "thought it would be interesting." Such a bad strawman.

Self sufficiency is the cure.

Right? That government must have been super insane and evil to push people to do this. Long live the working class, the backbone of every nation. Down with the bourgeois who greedily horde the wealth created by the working people. If only the world saw MORE bloody revolution, we might have leaders who don't constantly take advantage of us for money.

Sometimes evil is required to destroy something worse.

@@elijahlees8655 Or sometimes a greater evil swallows a lesser one, as with this revolution. Russia may have slowly transitioned to be the equal of Germany or Britain or the U.S. yet this revolution doomed the country into eternal poverty and corruption. Russia is forever lost.

@@VargasJulio39 the revolution is what brought Russia anywhere close to the modern age. But the revolutions in Germany failed and Stalin made too many mistakes.

The same people behind all of this research who they are

The people back then didn’t want it, not in and of itself. It was something they were compelled to do because of the stagnant and incompetent power structures they dealt with.

@@notesscrotes4360 i said today

Given how degenerate our western society has become, can you really not see why some people would welcome revolution? Some things are more important than wealth & materialism, or even your own life. For me the hope for a better future is worth losing everything.

@@kw8831 nah, he’s probably white and well off

@@kw8831 someone during the October Revolution would rationalize by saying *exactly* what you just said

Terror against the bourgeois, monarchs and landlords, not against the working class and peasantry, maybe actually read Lenin? Then again, that's a bit much to expect from westerners xD

@@Petey0707 and guess what happened? Terror on the working class and peasantry… maybe thinking is too much for you types.

​@@Petey0707 Over 10 million lost their lives. Were they all bourgeoisie? They were executing religious people.

​@@Petey0707 and the mencheviques and greens, but we don't talk about them

@@Petey0707 my great grandfather and his sons were killed because they were foreigners (Korean). You communists are all the same, can never see the pain you bring to others.

He needs more time raging about imaginary streamer tier lists.

Im curious, What do you mean by "diminishes the historic value"?

@@skyebaylis1675 One man's observations do not even scratch the surface of this historic event, but small though they may be, as far as the bigger picture is concerned, this does not make them any less important to Russian, or world history, is what I mean by "not diminishing the value" of the bigger picture... It's still an important first hand eye witness testimony to a most defining moment in history.

Indeed. As with all historic documents, it's important to keep in mind the details if the writing. This was written 30 years after the fact with a clear political message. The writer was a liberal who wanted the old Tsarist government over with, but feared that the masses might actually understand the necessity of taking back the property of the landlords and capitalists. Overall, his POV is very representative of the provisional government/the liberals at the time. Just like the tsar could not understand why the people were in revolt, so to the liberals in support of the propertied classes could not see why the people had chosen the Bolshevics

It may be from October by Sergei Eisenstein.

First nation in space. Sent a satellite into space to just do it. Single-handedly critically wounded the Nazi War Machines. It took 70 years of western interference to kill it. Hard to argue they didn't find a way out of monarchy.

@@andrewdickerson849 Singlehandedly critiically wounded the Nazi War Machines it helped create by allying to invade Poland, and also after the UK held them off for multiple years*. One the lucky few nations that managed to conquer a massive amounts of territory but completely collapsed in less than a 100 years* One of the many nations that turned monarchy into another form of monarchy: dictatorship* They found a lot of things, but not a way out of monarchy, nor a way out of that mess. The current monarch goes under the name Putin.

"Red Tsars" did not take Russia from a land of uneducated peasants to the first humans in space in a matter of mere decades.

As an American teacher in Istanbul, Turkey from 2013 to 2015 I met many Turkish people descended from White Russians who escaped the Bolchevik revolution in 1917 by emigrating to Turkey, many remarried to local Turks, or became Muslim, or stayed Russian Orthodox but thier children married and integrated into Turkish society.

As someone who has visited Istanbul on nine different occasions between May and November of 2017. I can attest to that statement. I too, have met Turks of Russian ancestry, whose grandparents or great grandparents were White Russian émigrés, who moved to Constantinople from Odessa in the early 1920s, decided to stay, rather than complete their trip to Paris, Berlin, or America. As far as I’ve been told. Their ancestors were far less wealthy, than those that were able to continue their travels to the Western World. Many took jobs as music or art teachers to children of the allied forces stationed in Constantinople. Especially those that arrived prior to 1922. It’s fascinating how dignified those people were, and how they made use of their skills and talents in music, art, and languages, to make a living. Rather than to simply prostitute themselves. A different breed of people, that’s for sure. Not counting the millions of Circassians. All descendants of migrants escaping the Russian genocide of the early to mid 19th century. Incidentally, one of them, a dear friend of mine, and a fellow millennial, was just messaging me over WhatsApp today, complaining about how rent has gone up, because of the many Ukrainian and Russian newcomers, who are USD rich, and how property prices have skyrocketed as well. Not to mention, how their son’s kindergarten fees have doubled or tripled, due to the influx of those newly arrived Ukrainians with so much dollars in their pockets.

The last paragraph of your comment hits very hard.

"but putin is based and not degenerate at all" lol.

A mediocre fantasy novel

One of the best books I’ve ever read. “And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!” The Gulag Archipelego

One must understand this was written in the context of a member of the aristocracy who was losing their power and position were threatened and ultimately destroyed, this can be an issue when relying on primary sources, however, this channel actively states this, and I can respect it for this. But this was written from a particular perspective of an individual who was threatened by the revolution. This shows this by him stating a series of false statements like his odd claim that the nobility of France supported the revolution. An agrarian farmer as an example would have a much, much different perspective of the revolution, as would a soldier, or industrial worker. This must always be kept in mind while reading primary sources.

The czars were pretty bad too. Seems like they caused communism .

@@JohnSmith-nh2te fantasy?

It's because we are a weak and dying society

Americans worship their constitution so I doubt things will change. People can still change things by the ballot box within their states and that is preferable to violence to most people.

@@roostercogburn7129 I don't disagree.

@@catmonarchist8920 not to the ChristoFascists .

It sure can, though US is infinitely more likely to become a fascist dictatorship rather than a communist one. January 6th coup attempt didn't work out, but there will be others.

Read 200 years together

Clip/edit a film the right way & you can make anybody look like an angel (or the devil). It’s very noticeable in modern WW2 documentaries where originally upbeat & patriotic clips of German soldiers marching are edited with ominous music to make sure everyone thinks “oh, these are the bad guys!!!”

What did Die Deutsche Wochenschau run into about late 1944? Can you please describe some details or tell me where to look. Thanks.

@@Kurtlane Die Deutsche Wochenschau ran head first into reality.

I rather doubt that most people are aware of Eisenstein's work in the way that you clearly are. Personally, as an art historian, I cringe at the reuse of Eisenstein's work in other contexts, but this is just the obsessiveness that my historical training has ground into me. ;) Your points about film editing and semiotics are accurate. This Sorokin text is quite something.

Poofta

Taliban had nothing to do with 9/11

Lets hope People don't twidt their panties over reading Letters of the Church fathers.

God bless ☦️

Most Communist countries weren't support of Israël

​@@adrien3019 and most communist countries ostracize jews

The revolution started as a monster, long live the Tsar.

Germany didn't reinsert Lenin, they just didn't stop him when he tried to sneak back in. And at this point the Russian Army was already broken, it's soldiers were fed up with being forced into suicidal charges by their incompetent commanders.

Russians I like they are like any other peoples. But what a sad state of affairs.😢

Same here.

We have our own in our own time

It's interesting to watch this video as a communist.

@@Shot5hells Yes as a Communist it is very interesting to see the perspective of the other side of the Revolution.

Massive cope calling a member of the socialist party a liberal

It probably is in V. Putin's Russia.

Why on earth would KZfaq ban this?

@@henrimourant9855 This is exact content that yt pushes in the algoritim.