AnalystPrep's GMAT® Focus Course Can Be Found Here: analystprep.co...
Book a One-on-One Tutoring Session with Stefan Here: analystprep.co...
Question Logistics
- Likely the Least Frequently Occurring Question Type
- Approximately Ten of the Questions in 36 Question Verbal Section
- Usually About 80% Argument Tasks and About 20% Inference Tasks
Strategic Best Practices
- Assume 2min per Question Average
- Maximum 3min for Any Question
- Note Task of Question Before Engaging Prompt
- Limit to Single Prompt Reread Before Eliminating Choices for Common Wrong Answers & Guessing
- Always Take Targeted Notes to Proactively Address Specific Question Task
- Primary Question Format to Guess and Skip if Behind Pace After Question 12 or Question 24
Recognizing Identify the Flaw Tasks
- Identify Reference to an Argument in Question Stem
- Note Task Words Such as “Flaw” “Vulnerable” “Fails to Consider”
- Beware of Mistaking a Weaken Task for an Identify the Flaw Task
Strategic Implications
- Requires a Close Consideration of the Details of the Argument
- No New Information is Provided by the Choices
- Attempt to Categorically Identify the Type of Argument to Broadly Predict Possible Assumptions
- Use Critical Thinking to Determine Why Assumption(s) May Prove Invalid
- Focus on Wrong Answers Addressing Concerns Beyond Conclusion
- Eliminate More Quickly if a Choice Closely Matches Prediction
Identifying Flaws in an Argument
- Try to Predict Specifically Based on the Type of Argument the Reason an - Assumption Required to Validate the Conclusion is Unlikely to be True
- Properly Categorizing an Argument is Especially Helpful in Proactively - Identifying Reasoning Flaws to Expedite Elimination
Analogy | A = B
- Assumes - Items in argument are comparable in relevant ways
- Likely Flaw - Items are not reasonably comparable in a specifically relevant way
Representation
- Assumes - Evidentiary sample is representative of the larger whole population in conclusion
- Likely Flaws - Subtle term shifts from evidence to conclusion or a sample that is inherently unrepresentative of the overall population it claims to represent
Data and Evidence Interpretation
- Assumes - No other reasonable interpretation of data or evidence
- Likely Flaw - There is another more likely interpretation of the evidence or numerical data than is suggested by the conclusion
Causality | A implies B
- Assumes - No other possible causes or outcomes, and that the circumstance is not merely a coincidence
- Likely Flaws - Another cause or outcome is more reasonable, or the conclusion seems coincidental
Plan or Recommendation
- Assumes - Execution and approach will work
- Likely Flaw - The plan or recommendation has an inherent weakness that will not allow it to succeed or shows that the plan is unnecessary
Identify the Flaw Task Checklist
Step 1
- Note an Identify the Flaw Task by Recognizing Key Indicator Terms and the Presence of an Argument with a Main Conclusion
Step 2
- Read Prompt as Written Paying Close Attention to Type of Information Provided in Premise and Note Explicit Conclusion
Step 3
- If Common Argument Identified - More Specifically Predict What an Inherent Flaw in the Argument is Based on Type of Evidence
- If No Common Argument Identified - Use Generic Prediction “Find Reason the Conclusion That... is Inherently Unlikely”
Step 4
- Seek a Match to Your Prediction and Eliminate Choices that Fail to Address Task Using Common Wrong Answer Reasons