Sorry for the 3rd parts highlight being so quiet. Was litteraly the only one that was deemed good to use. Fingers crossed 🤞🤞🤞. Also I wanted to include the boxscore as I felt it may have been worth talking about. Hopefully you enjoyed that last part cause I didn't want it to be like "its just a random score lol." Wanted it to be interesting.

Hull had possession of the puck, it never turned over. Hasek blocked it off back to Hull. Hull scored.There was a rule that you can’t be in the crease, but it accounted for more of a player who didn’t have possession to start. What Hull did was completely legal. Sorry Sabres, it was good.

As a flyers fan, bringing up 2010 practically gives me PTSD lol

I had a feeling the Blackhawks would end up here lol

Minor point, 98 was the Czech Republic, Czechoslovakia ceased to exist in 94. Slovakia were eliminated in the preliminary round before the nhlers arrived. See the Ruslan Salei controversy that saw a change in IIHF rules. 😊

Besides Kane, two other guys saw the puck go in and reacted right away. First was Darrol Powe, #36 on the Flyers. Look where he standing. He had a perfect view of it going in, and watch his reaction. He stops and droops and takes out his mouthgard. He knows the game is over. The other is Patrick Sharp, who has the same angle as Powe, only from further back. He reacts immediately and chases Kane down the ice. He also bumped into Andrew Ladd and probably said something like "It's In!" because Ladd joins in the celebration. Blackhawks #24, Nick Boynton, over on the right side, raises his stick, but I think only because he saw Kane do the same, because he looks confused after and doesn't join in with Kane, Sharp & Ladd right away. I think the most confused guy was poor Mike Emrick. He didn't know what happened.

Anyone remember when there was two pucks on the ice during a pens vs caps playoff game

“2 words, NO GOAL” -Lindy Ruff

What’s up IDGT! Super excited to see you uploaded again! It’s super confusing sometimes in NHL games. Also I remember a few teams the caps scored a goal and then no one saw it at first

Just one little point as a guy who was born in Czechoslovakia - we actually dissolved into 2 countries in 93, and there was team Czech republic and nowdays team Czechia and team Slovakia (I am from there). Sorry for being extremely confusing, but this trend is going througout whole history of former Czechoslovakia :D

Hulls goal was good due to a memo that had been sent out saying if they opposing team has possession they can and the sabers always forget to admit that they had all of regulation and ot to win. It’s time for the excuses to end. I’m not a fan of either team, I’m just tired of hearing about it

Conterversial opinion Hull goal is a good goal because when he was in the crease the puck was too and when the puck came out of the paint so did hulls skate

That 2010 game winner hurts me as a Flyers fan

Been a minute since I’ve heard Rob Zamuner’s name… I’m old 😂

Good goal for hull. Wasnt against the rules at the time as he had posession. Never understood the controversy tbh.

Video was ON POINT brother!

You should make a video on hockey lost media, loved the vid btw

Looking into the canucks oilers game, they pulled the goalie with 2:06 left in OT because they absolutely needed a win in order to stay in the playoff hunt. A single point for a tie or otl would be useless for them. Not sure why this was hard for you to find out, since i found it with a simple google search and a link to some articles from the day after.

Would love to see some Olympic videos for you keep up the great work

Great video. I’ll eat to this lol

I think the hull goal counts cuz the NHL made a amendment to the rule quietly before the playoff saying that if the player possessed the puck in the crease then the goal counts hulk had possession clearly and its a good goal by the best pure goalscorer of his area. I mean I know maybe Mario and wayne were better but hull was insane.

Watching that Buffalo vs Stars as a Hawks fan, I thought it was no goal at first. It really felt like they just wanted the game over. I forget how many ot's, but that game dragged, and it felt like no one would score with both teams running the neutral zone trap.

The rule stating you forfeit a point in overtime if you pull the goalie was implemented in 2015, so I find that one confusing. The ruie itself is ridiculous as well.

Hull was in the crease but so was the puck. Good goal.

After Hull shot the puck, or attempted to shoot the puck the first time, it came outside the crease. His skate was in the crease when he shot it into the net. I disagree with the NHL's assessment that he had possession. When you shoot the puck and there's a rebound, that's not possession. I didn't see anything in the crease rule about possession anyway. So, I think the goal should have been reviewed and disallowed. ... "If a player has entered the crease prior to the puck, and subsequently the puck should enter the net while such conditions prevail, the apparent goal shall not be allowed"

Woooooo another video 🔥🔥🔥🔥

It was a great goal for the stars

awesome video

2:46 as someone from Buffalo this is pain (

It's hard to look back at 2010 without thinking about Brad Aldrich now. He ruined Chicago's reign of dominance.

I'm a Hawks fan, I heard the puck hit the back of the net, I knew immediately the puck went in and it was a good goal - I wasn't confused at all - you can hear the "thump" it makes when it hits the net, so when I heard the "thump" I knew the Hawks just won the Cup - as for the moment itself and the puck? Yea, as a lifetime Hawks fan - I mean I was 31 at the time - I never imagined when the Hawks finally did win a Cup it would be like "that", lol - with all of the confusion, lol.. I mean like I said, I was absolutely certain Kane scored - there was zero doubt in my mind but the whole "instant replay" to confirm it - I guess - took a little of the excitement out of it.... As for the puck itself - no one knows where the game puck went or who has it - many believe Chris Pronger took it, just like he allegedly took all of the other game pucks from that series, presumably in an attempt to get under the Hawks skin? lol...... Either way, that was an exhilarating moment as a life-long diehard Hawks fan of 26 years at the time, but little did I know at that moment I would see the Hawks lift the Cup 2 more times.... I will admit tho, it was clear to me early on in the 2010 season that the Hawks were going to win the Cup, so I wasn't "shocked" but "how" they won it was pretty "unusual/bizarre"... Also, keep in mind the way the Hawks won Game 6 of the 2013 SCF was pretty bizarre too. I mean late in the 3rd period Boston scored to take the lead 2-1 with less than 5 minutes left, then Bickell via Toews scores to tie it up, then 17 seconds later Dave Bolland scores the eventual game winning goal to take the lead.... I mean in a matter of just a couple of minutes it went from looking like the Hawks were going to lose Game 6 and have to play a Game 7 "winner takes all" to "alright, I guess we're going to overtime" to "Stanley Cup Champion", lol - and it really was just a matter of minutes. From biting nails to Stanley Cup Champs, lol... I mean out of the 3 Cups the Hawks won, the only "normal" Cup clinching game for the Hawks that didn't end with dramatics was Game 6 vs Tampa Bay in 2015 in which the Hawks held the lead all game, Crawford got the shutout and the Hawks - without drama - clinched the Cup... Also, I actually have Andrew Shaw's 2013 Game One OT game puck (the actual game puck) in my hockey memorabilia collection, it's autographed too, he even inscribed it "3OT" - obviously because the goal was scored in the 3rd OT..... IDK, just thought I would brag about having the puck, I mean it is a game used game winning goal OT puck and I am a Hawks fan so I find the puck super neat, knowing that it is indeed a piece of history.

"Closest thing we've gotten to a dynasty in a very long time" ...the Lightning would like to know your location. The Penguins thought they wanted to know your location too, but they are less dynasty and more "consistently very good"

cool vid, 'chuk

I always thought the crease rule was stupid. Thankfully they got it right allowing to challenge for goalie interference

Bob Clarke has always shown favoritism towards Lindros, *Cough* when he got beat up for sleeping with Brind Amours wife and Rod got traded *Cough*

7:47 hasek made a glove save💀

Let's Go IDONTGIVETKACHUK Upload Btw Paul I'm going to a ducks vs Flames game on my birthday Good luck to the flames

And yeah the transition into the end screen looks so rough it bugs me too wth 😭😭😭

Whenever the NHLPA does anything with fines or suspentions

That last one is strange

Hull Did not score there , that was 100% not a good goal. At Least he went on to play for the wings though.🙂

FYI, a memo had gone out by the league to the refs and teams before the Playoffs started (IIRC) that said those types of goals are OK. That's what Hull stated, anyway. Why the memo was never made public or why nothing about it was ever announced to the media or the public, I'll never know.

The puck went to a 2nd demisison

Love the 2010 hawks. The players shouldn’t have to take the blame for the faults of management

It would have been even worse if they didn’t allow the Hull goal!

The canucks one was insane. It was 2011 think you could have found better quality. Niemi like everyone on both teams had no idea but he hears a slap shot and instinctively butterflies in his net but had no clue who shot it and where it was coming from. I think given that they were facing elimination in OT he heard the shot and immediately said to himself oh shit.. then the horn is fucking blasting his ear off lol. Poor guy and definitely an anomaly. I wish I had camera control and I could watch it in a slow motion speed and angle of my choosing. Yes the Chicago vs flyers goal was similar except toews probably saw it maybe another hawk facing the play but the flyers defending were facing away from the goal.

The Coyotes were in Phoenix not in Arizona back then, other than that great video!

I wish I had footage of this, but I remember being at a Halifax Citadels vs Fredericton Express game when a guy dumped the puck against the boards from center ice ( Remember this was in the 80;s) and it slid down the area on top of the boards where the glass met it.. it went all the way down and the goalie went to get it.. BUT as he waited at the boards for it to come to him, it Hit a partition and popped out.. and went.. right in the net. I only saw this happen once again and it was an NHL game.. Vancouver vs Winnipeg in the old Winnipeg arena back when Kirk McLean was still their goalie.

1:00

He said Lindros should be captain, which is ironic, because years later, *HE SHOULDN'T BE CAPTAIN*

Pretty sure the NHL released a memo for the playoffs relaxing the ruling on skates in the crease.

I made it! Let's gooooooooooo!!!!

I swear to god everytime dallas stars 99 game 6 was only confusing cause the rule was awful. technically its a good goal by what the rules were, and they couldnt really use this rule it was applied so weirdly. its kinda like the nfl's taunting rule sometimes almost nothing can be considered taunting and yet some people can bend the rules. its really what the ref feels and while thats always true atleast we can understand some of the normal calls.

6:48 *against team Czech Republic and Dominik Hasek wasn't the only star, remember Jaromir Jagr?

What confuses me is every time I have a hockey game you post a vid Example: Today we just were crowned Champions of the thanksgiving tournament and when was it published today

The great one would have gone bar down we all know that

I’m not a Sabres fan but I’m sick and tired of seeing 1999 Stanley Cup game 6 goal

94 never more

Ok

Number 1) why wasn’t Hicketts extended

I know all the Dallas Stars fans would probably like it if I kept my mouth shut but they're the only ones that don't want to discuss the validity of Brett holes Stanley cup winning goal. A lot has been made of this over the years but let's set the record straight, if you call that goal back in the regular season it's not a goal. If you call it back in the playoffs it's not a goal so that means if you call it back in the Stanley cup finals again it's not a goal. They had been recalling that as a no goal since October. But Gary bettman was worried that the league would be embarrassed after rushing the Stanley cup out on the ice too quickly, in his attempt to try to cover up and a small embarrassment, he created a much bigger one. Possibly the biggest black spot in the history of the Stanley cup finals. What's done is done. But that doesn't mean it's right no we can't play the game over no we can't take the Stanley cup back but it's still not a goal.

99, NO GOAL!!

Pretty sure Patrick Kane is still a hockey star. 😂

Kane is the leading scorer in the two thousand ten's. Not just the early two thousand ten's. Check.

Wow

His foot was in the crease.

NO GOAL!!!

How's Kanes goal Stained? The Sexual Assault in 2010 revealed this year?

What about the Flames vs the Lightning in the 2004 Cup Finals? Game six, Gelinas scored in regulation, but the refs openly refused to review the goal, and when it was, the result wasn't stated from Toronto. Days went by between games six and seven before a "review" was shown, where the goal line was doubled in width to hide the fact that Gelinas won the Cup for Calgary in game six. That also just adds to the blatant tripping done by the Bolts in OT that converted directly to the game winning goal. It was done RIGHT in front of the ref, who was looking directly at the play as it happened. Tampa failed to score again, which lead to OT; this essentially robbed a team of a championship. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/g6x_Zdxhx5uoqHk.html

“No goal”

Hi

"Great call" Emrick is the single worst broadcaster that has ever worked in hockey. Although Leah Hextall is battling for that spot.

It was no goal

cool

The 2010 Chicago Blackhawks buried a sexual assault of one of its own players to win a championship. There, fixed it.

not a goal

First

Oh, my poor Blackhawks. Where did it all go so wrong? Anyway, great video, I love crazy "WTF" stuff like this, always amusing. Personally, I'd like to think that if Gretzky had a stronger role in that game against the Czechs things would've been different, but who knows? Awesome stuff.👍🏒🥅🚨