if hindu scripture not words of God how prophet Muhammad mentioned in it Dr Zakir Naik

  Рет қаралды 110,263

Huda TV

Huda TV

3 жыл бұрын

#HUDATV
if hindu scripture not words of god how prophet Muhammad mentioned in it DR Zakir Naik #fatwa #islam
Huda TV ... A Light in Every home
SUBSCRIBE To our channel :
kzfaq.info/love/IVS...
Join us on our official pages for Huda Tv on:
/ huda.tv ,
/ hudatvchannel ,
www.google.com/+Hudatvchannel ,
/ hudasatellitetv ,
/ hudatv ,
www.huda.tv .

Пікірлер: 2 000
@rudresh27upadhyay
@rudresh27upadhyay 3 жыл бұрын
He is right....Hindu Scriptures has been Modified and Changed time by time.....Which Was done knowingly
@divyarajpurohit2406
@divyarajpurohit2406 2 жыл бұрын
Proof??
@Bidisha826
@Bidisha826 Жыл бұрын
But here..Zakir saheb is modifying Hindu scriptures..how tolerant our scriptures are..na?!!
@MustafaAli-lb8dq
@MustafaAli-lb8dq Жыл бұрын
@@MessianicPlayz Quran will never be modified as this is 21st century and muslims fiercely defend it.
@east2west2east
@east2west2east Жыл бұрын
Actually in Bhavishya Puran Mahamad is used for DEMON. Read it if anyone has any doubts.
@amirulnazreen1518
@amirulnazreen1518 8 ай бұрын
​@@Bidisha826oiii machaa
@jackryder6732
@jackryder6732 3 жыл бұрын
Hindus please ask questions. Do not be in dark
@findoutthetruth5068
@findoutthetruth5068 2 жыл бұрын
Apne ma behen ko chodne walo itihaas jaan pehele.. Zakir Naik was banned from india, in the same way in Malaysia too.
@Nero6570
@Nero6570 Жыл бұрын
if not accepting islam is being in dark then I am okay with it😂
@gnanaganesh5937
@gnanaganesh5937 Жыл бұрын
@@Nero6570 Yes okay..... As Guru Gobind Singh Sahib said , " for yours your religion is good , and for us our religion is good " ....
@gnanaganesh5937
@gnanaganesh5937 Жыл бұрын
To say Zakir Naik is itself a hindu , what do you meant by Hindu ??? , it doesn't refers to any religion , it refers to the people whom lives beyond the Indus river . I am proud to say Zakir Naik as Hindu , but I am foolish to say him Sanataani or the person whom born on the holy land of Bhaarat . He has no light on the subcontinent he was born ..
@findoutthetruth5068
@findoutthetruth5068 Жыл бұрын
@@gnanaganesh5937 originally the religion is sanatan but if it's famous in the name of hindu.. then it's ok.. Oldest and beautiful religion in the world is Sanatan ❤️❤️❤️❤️
@abdever2140
@abdever2140 3 жыл бұрын
Many Hindus of the Eastern Asia understood Islam and that's why they converted.
@aptituderec1120
@aptituderec1120 3 жыл бұрын
They were forcefully changed
@aptituderec1120
@aptituderec1120 3 жыл бұрын
@Blue Fox really who said read the history and what Zakir Naik is doing is not less than invading
@srnp0007
@srnp0007 3 жыл бұрын
@Blue Fox :- And What About Iran , Afghanistan , Pakistan , India , Bangladesh , Countries of Central Asia & North Africa ?
@srnp0007
@srnp0007 3 жыл бұрын
@Blue Fox :- There were talking about Eastern Asia.........." Why Cherry Picking ? That is Why I Asked The Question. Where All Hindus/ Buddhists Are Gone ?
@srnp0007
@srnp0007 3 жыл бұрын
@Blue Fox :- Please Remove East Asia From Your Head. I Have Asked This Question to Say That Indonesia & Malaysia Could Be Exceptions.
@fittalib
@fittalib Жыл бұрын
Quran is the memorized book on earth nobody can ever corrupt it. 😊
@Ultraman_123
@Ultraman_123 Жыл бұрын
the gita has never been altered, people say it is as they either want to defame it or people simply dont understand the true meaning behind the words as the message came directly from god, not a prophet
@zainpo7a708
@zainpo7a708 Жыл бұрын
@@vedicarya7 bs geeta is reformed
@fittalib
@fittalib Жыл бұрын
@@vedicarya7 omg 🤣 I'm sure if i should laugh or not, but there's no proof of authenticity of your scriptures 👎
@fittalib
@fittalib Жыл бұрын
@@Ultraman_123 prophets are people appointed by God, God himself won't write books or come down to teach humanity and all, you people have lost your prophet, and for Gita idk about it, so I'm not making statements on it 🙂
@Ultraman_123
@Ultraman_123 Жыл бұрын
@@fittalib why are u commenting if ur not gonna talk about the gita ☠️
@kirank2145
@kirank2145 3 жыл бұрын
He cant mention bhagavadgeeta cause god explains his expanded form and say whoever wants to reach me in any form I'll come to him in that form
@logicalthinker483
@logicalthinker483 3 жыл бұрын
Why should he mention all the hindu scriptures. Drop your hate. Do you think God should stoop that low. You are equating man with God And you are taking that verse literally!
@logicalthinker483
@logicalthinker483 3 жыл бұрын
@piyush Sharma what do you mean by manifestation? And when you tell Hinduism tells so and so, produce the verse from the vedas or quote from the schools of thought.
@spectord8588
@spectord8588 2 жыл бұрын
@piyush Sharma please name 1 error in the Qur'an please. Furthermore, when it talks of Pharaoh it talks of how it will preserve its body as sign for the future .... We can now see this to be true
@blackflag6976
@blackflag6976 2 жыл бұрын
Vedas are superior to the bhagvadgeeta
@blackflag6976
@blackflag6976 2 жыл бұрын
@Sky Flora Bhagvadgita is written by men, not by God. it is just a part of mahabharat.
@zulkarnainop6327
@zulkarnainop6327 3 жыл бұрын
We don't even know how precious this man is...
@agsitaraman3270
@agsitaraman3270 3 жыл бұрын
i know and also know how much damage these precious people cause to the humanity
@zulkarnainop6327
@zulkarnainop6327 3 жыл бұрын
@@agsitaraman3270 baba ramdev Ram rahim Asaram bapu Radhe maa Builder baba Swami omji And the list goes on These are rapist but have bunch of followers
@hkjavid
@hkjavid 3 жыл бұрын
First you should be precise to know the precision.
@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543
@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 3 жыл бұрын
@@agsitaraman3270 your claims without evidences are ignored, salafis know his errors. if you are not a salafi , hush!
@user-lk9pn8qv4n
@user-lk9pn8qv4n 3 жыл бұрын
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 salafis..another false sect..who will be next..?
@rajpandey7722
@rajpandey7722 2 жыл бұрын
Quran ,Vedas,bible are words of god's revealed to prophets but Geeta is words of god sung by God himself .
@rajpandey7722
@rajpandey7722 2 жыл бұрын
@Faris Bin Saif Brother I am brahmin myself and only Hindu scholars who believe in Vedas and formless form of god say such thing to .Vedas are shrutis and other Hindu text comes in smritis but Geeta is the only text which comes in Shruti , smriti and ithaas .
@rajpandey7722
@rajpandey7722 2 жыл бұрын
I am saying even Allah is supreme god but in formless aspect and lord Krishna is the same allah whi has taken form .logically if we say god is all power full and by saying it cannot take form we are limiting it's power
@rajpandey7722
@rajpandey7722 2 жыл бұрын
@Faris Bin Saif Yes u are right Vedas were ban from shudras and Brahmins intellect were contaminated and righteousness was decreasing when lord Krishna appeared on earth and spoke gita (song of god ) to Arjuna for whole of mankind .Is Quaran not writren by prophet Mohammed peace be upon him ?
@rajpandey7722
@rajpandey7722 2 жыл бұрын
@Faris Bin Saif God did not turn into flesh he appeared on earth in his divine form for devotees .Imagine if u wish allah to be ur son will allah not grant ur wish ?And Brahma ,shiva ,indra etc is just post assigned to soul like u and me but who has reached tremendously elevated consciousness.Even u can become lord
@rajpandey7722
@rajpandey7722 2 жыл бұрын
@Faris Bin Saif That is because gita says alll living being are equal and divine which was not acceptable to many pandits as they want to consider themself superior and exploit other section of society .The four class(brahmin,shudra etc) was divided on basis of karma( merit) and not birth which was wrongly spread by some pandits so that they can be superior .
@harekrishna6818
@harekrishna6818 3 жыл бұрын
4:44 vedas are timeless and infinte.we got to know only miniscule amount of it.
@muhammedrashidnm4438
@muhammedrashidnm4438 3 жыл бұрын
Please research not looking at Zakir Nayik. I respect all religion but if you read Quran you get all your answer. Please research and prophet Muhammad gave many minor sighn of qiyamah and it come true please research
@smondal2760
@smondal2760 3 жыл бұрын
@muhammed. Rashid. You are getting all answer from Quran, because quran is very latest, if you do detail analysis, it has taken all specific things from vedas, Gita s , and bibles.. then the new religion created- Ishlam... vedas created far ago than bibles and qurans.. after decade so many things modified and added.. so it gests mixed and complicated.. but the main soul is pure.. what u cant find in quran and bible you will definitely find in the Vedas..
@logicalthinker483
@logicalthinker483 3 жыл бұрын
@@smondal2760 stop this propoganda. Vedas are 5000 years old and at max 7000 years. Many tribes living in Africa have been worshipping one true God without any idols that predates the vedas . Dont tell that vedas are the oldest ones. And Muslims believe that Adam (p.b.u.h) is the first human and he himself believed only in one true God without any idols. And did you say Quran is copied from vedas? This proves your ignorance! There was no hindus in Arabia at the time of Prophet. Of course there were idolators but not even a single idol was similar to the Indian concept! And remember Quran is perfect without any errors. Unlike the scriptures which you quoted.
@smondal2760
@smondal2760 3 жыл бұрын
@@logicalthinker483 in the oldest vedas, like rig vedas, no idols are mentioned to be worshipped.. only one supreme power was mentioned.. but they gave respect to all god creatures like- water, air, fire etc... and later they started worshipping those.. hindus culter is modified cultures of vedas.. but even before muslim ,Christian there was the religion created hindu-thats why its called oldest.. according to vedas -energy is everything,everywhere even in a single particle.. that energy called God.. what is that energy? The force of the attraction of nucleus and electron, the conversion forces between neutron and proton.. have u ever thought? Who provide these energy?according to newtons law without giving force nothing can be moved, then how electron rotates? Who give them energy... hindus taught us - God is everywhere,in everything..... but muslim/christian s are saying-everything is created by god, if u do harm,god will punish..etc.. then where is the god?😀... due to some corrupt monk and all... Hinduism could not keep its domination,,, otherwise these religions(muslim,buddhas,jain. Etc) would not be created and would not even necessary.. you will find knowledge of chemistry, surgery, mathematics and all in vedas which was written 7000 yrs back.. some muslim and christian rulers destroyd our university and library,,, which was words best on those ages(500-1000 Ac).... do research and then reply me
@smondal2760
@smondal2760 3 жыл бұрын
@@logicalthinker483 quran has too many errors, like verse - “u should kill those creature who disrespects quran”... so it means quran is urging for protection of its respect and existence.. any body can say that quran is written by human being.. its completed on 500ce.. after getting knowledges of prophets... nothing else.. in the ancient ages-harappan, mesopotemian U will find the concept of vedas.. not quran/bible. ..
@freepalestine9471
@freepalestine9471 3 жыл бұрын
*When the Hindus forgot their Vedas,* *Christians & Jews added concoction in the Bible,* *Muslims made the Holy Quraan the most memorised religious scripture in the whole world.* 👑❤
@ishakmed6426
@ishakmed6426 2 жыл бұрын
Muslims did not make Al Quran,rather it was revealed to Prophet Mohamed PUH from Allah SWT.
@kuralovien5524
@kuralovien5524 2 жыл бұрын
And that Quran was eaten by a goat when people were mourning over Muhammad's death. Sounds like a real preservation lol.
@haasanbismil8723
@haasanbismil8723 2 жыл бұрын
@@kuralovien5524 Quran was not in the form of book like we have today at that time 😂 during prophet Mohammed saw death.... So stop saying bullshits about it
@kuralovien5524
@kuralovien5524 2 жыл бұрын
@@haasanbismil8723 hmmm really! If Quran was not in the form of book then how do you know it's 100% pure without any addition. And every religious scripture started as oral tradition so not sure how that's particularly important Considering that's the case for every relgion(except maybe sikism).
@haasanbismil8723
@haasanbismil8723 2 жыл бұрын
@@kuralovien5524 u knw what there is point to explain it to u😂 But fir bhi...Quran was not in the form of book as a whole but when ever a ayat was revealed to nabi(saw) he learn it recites it 1000 of times and also tell his companions that time muslim they also learn it recites it thousands of times and write it wherever they are comfortable to secure it... Every year in the month of Ramadan... people recites whole Quran .... There were so many processes to secure the Quran and also Allah took guarantee of Quran by himself that no one can ever change a bit of it.... It was not in the form of a book like we have today with arrangment of verses and all....
@aidomuah
@aidomuah 3 жыл бұрын
I love that Dr Zakir Naik always finish with “hope this answers the question”
@Memorize-Quran-With-Me
@Memorize-Quran-With-Me 3 жыл бұрын
Angels in grave: who is your Lord, religion and prophet? Dr: Allah, Islam, Muhammad (saw) ... hope this answers the question!
@amiredubizrulescomunties7984
@amiredubizrulescomunties7984 3 жыл бұрын
Fighting is meaningless. I found mention in other religious about prophet Muhammad (saww) in hindu , buddha , jews , Christian, zoraristiam books here the proof kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ndh4ntek27PGipc.html "Remember patience key to success" If you want more proof go RESEARCH yourself There is alot of researched material already. Happy learning Brothers and sisters
@sayanhalder6752
@sayanhalder6752 3 жыл бұрын
Wonderful misinterpretation to make muhammad in vedas and puranas
@fdevstudio5692
@fdevstudio5692 2 жыл бұрын
@@Memorize-Quran-With-Me don't make religion as a meme. One more thing, thay ask in arabic.
@Memorize-Quran-With-Me
@Memorize-Quran-With-Me 2 жыл бұрын
@@fdevstudio5692 islam allows joking. Lighten up.
@alihand9182
@alihand9182 3 жыл бұрын
Who ever says ‘SubhanAllahi wa Bihamdihi’ 100 times his sins will be forgiven even if they are as much as the foam of the sea. Sahih Hadith of the Prophet (Pbuh)
@lolthought6984
@lolthought6984 3 жыл бұрын
@Shane Walshit's not a stupid test.U might wanna reverse ur attitude towards it. Be nice. It's a test to check wether the humanity will respect the creator of everyone. And the burning of hell is given to the people who went astray away from the truth and the corrupted one's
@user-lk9pn8qv4n
@user-lk9pn8qv4n 3 жыл бұрын
So if i kill 100 people, loot and steal...and make millions from drug dealing..and thats all i have to say...and i am forgiven..awesome..
@lolthought6984
@lolthought6984 3 жыл бұрын
@@user-lk9pn8qv4n lol it's not like that
@alihand9182
@alihand9182 3 жыл бұрын
A no. Those are major sins you will need to seriously repent and never do such sins again and try your best to fix your mistakes and change your bad habits, basically you will need to change altogether and Allah knows what’s in the heart and will forgive you if you are sincere. The short prayer I mentioned is for someone who recites this everyday and this wipes out sins but you will need to do a lot more than this if you want to wipe away major sins such as killing, loot and steal and millions from drug dealing.
@alihand9182
@alihand9182 3 жыл бұрын
minor sins are easily done daily hence why we would have a lot more minor sins in terms of quantity and this short duaa every day sounds easy but it takes someone who wants to change to recite them 100 times a day
@transporttechtv
@transporttechtv 3 жыл бұрын
لكل اجل كتاب For every term is a decree.
@Sunny-lc4vk
@Sunny-lc4vk 2 жыл бұрын
"From the breath of the Supreme Being came the Ṛg Veda, Yajur Veda, Sāma Veda, Atharva Veda, Itihāsas, Purāṇas, Upaniṣads, verses, sūtras, prose explanations, and Vedic commentaries." - Bṛhad-āraṇyaka Upaniṣad 2.4.10
@shoaib9125
@shoaib9125 2 жыл бұрын
Errors in Hindu Scripture 1. Earth is fixed, don't rotate and revolve. 2. Sky stand on support 3. Earth got pillars 4. Sun revolve around earth 5. Horse take sun to sky 'He who fixed firm the earth that staggered, and set rest the agitated mountains, who measured out" [Rigveda Book 2, hymn 12, Mantra 21 2. God has firmly fixed the earth with pegs around it [Yajur Vedas Ch 5 Mantra 16] 3. Lamp kept in the windless place and doesn't shake [Bhagavand Gita Ch 6 verse 191 4. Sun is full of light and knows all human beings, so his (horses) take him to sky to look at the world" [ Rig Veda Book 1 Hymn 50 Mantra 1] 5. 0, bright sun, a chariot named harit with seven horses take you to sky [ Rig Ved Book 1 Hymn 50 Mantra 8] Three are earths, and three arr heavens and three are atmosphere. Three vaults of heaven, three seas andthree stationary bodies [Atharva Vedas 19.27.3-4] Urine as remedy and drink of God indicated in [Atharva Vedas 6.44.3, 6.57.1-2] Birds can fly in space indicated in [Rig Vedas 1.25.7 and 5.59.7] Water runs on moon indicated in [Atharva Vedas 18.4.89, Yajur Veda 33.90, and Rig Veda 1.105.1] Next time first research your own literatures and then come to debate. Bye.
@randomindianboy-wb9eq
@randomindianboy-wb9eq 2 жыл бұрын
@@shoaib9125 beta all this you wrote are wrong debate ??? Lmao
@falkhal6848
@falkhal6848 2 жыл бұрын
Who was the prophet who brought this religious
@Sunny-lc4vk
@Sunny-lc4vk 2 жыл бұрын
@@falkhal6848 our sanatana dharma don't follow prophets, it is eternal religion, never changes.
@falkhal6848
@falkhal6848 2 жыл бұрын
@@Sunny-lc4vk there is no eternal tell us the prophet or messenger. There is someone behind.
@seemaislam6995
@seemaislam6995 Жыл бұрын
Thanks sir, i was also struggling with this type of question and now i found my answer 😊
@dineshchoudhary7098
@dineshchoudhary7098 8 ай бұрын
There is nothing like mentioned in hindu scripture
@aprilfool3240
@aprilfool3240 3 жыл бұрын
If you happen to understand tamil , read "Thirumanthiram"
@a.z.s6679
@a.z.s6679 3 жыл бұрын
I don’t read it but hope u tell me what ur talking about
@thabisonkgahle4263
@thabisonkgahle4263 3 жыл бұрын
Keep searching and digging and digging for the truth about Gods word May God bless you
@r4reviews334
@r4reviews334 2 жыл бұрын
May God bless you too Ameen
@padyala
@padyala 2 жыл бұрын
But Hindu texts are older than Islamic texts so Allah favoring Hindus earlier and later muslims came and claiming.
@blackxdeft5791
@blackxdeft5791 2 жыл бұрын
I have to buy an expensive car after 3 years But in-between that period I have to buy something Cheap for my daily use and purposes Just Like for the People of Past Allah send many Prophets But Prophet Mohammad SAW is the last Prophet and will Guidance till the day of Judgement that anyone can get guidance through it
@anonymousanonymous2319
@anonymousanonymous2319 2 жыл бұрын
I'm Hindu. I have some respect for what Zakir is saying. Hinduism is very complicated but it encompasses the truth somewhere . However unlike with most religions, our truth doesn't require another religion to be a lie. Take religion like languages, we may see and say the same things but maybe in a different way. Peace be with you all 🙏 whether you are Muslim or Hindu 🕉️ ☪️❤️
@anonymousanonymous2319
@anonymousanonymous2319 2 жыл бұрын
@@davidcoleman6308 correct but the world is universal, it doesn't revolve around Arabic. Every religion believes in one supreme so how do you know that we don't all believe in the same thing? Perhaps Christians call it God, Muslims Allah and Hindus as Brahman. Zakir constantly alludes to Hinduism and Buddhism but it is from an Islamic pov. Equally a Hindu could say that a true Muslim should believe in Kalki whom he believes to be Prophet Muhammed pbuh. So if one is praying to Brahman and believes in Kalki and Krishna and others while another prays to Allah and believes in Muhammad pbuh and others... What's the harm? Why is only one correct?
@anonymousanonymous2319
@anonymousanonymous2319 2 жыл бұрын
@@davidcoleman6308 but equally anyone who follows the teachings of Sanatana Dharma could be considered a Hindu (and we had no founder or holy book). Sanatana Dharma is a philosophy.
@anonymousanonymous2319
@anonymousanonymous2319 2 жыл бұрын
@@davidcoleman6308 you didn't practise hinduism correct because you assumed it was just like an Abrahamic religion whereas hinduism isn't like that. Sanatana Dharma is a way of life. The religions themselves are within like Shaivism, Vaishnavism, Smartism etc. and there are several texts but we don't adhere to one holy book or founder. Sanatana Dharma focuses on DHARMA (it's in the name) and you took the stereotypical bait and myths that Abrahamic followers put on us. You realise that there are literally non-theistic Hindus. We don't reject anyone, we just don't look at things from an Abrahamic standpoint. The core concepts of Sanatana Dharma are Dharma, Karma, Atman and Brahman. Live virtuously and choose the right path for you. It is not us who have gone astray my friend. It is you who has judged us incorrectly. None of the prophets came to India except for Buddha (who some argue is a prophet of Allah) and we hold him in high regard pbuh. Some Muslims argue that Krishna and Kalki are prophets. Also there is no solid evidence of Jesus Christ or many accounts so for us, they are equally myths. I accept that most Hindu stories are myths even though there is some proclaimed evidence but that's not representative of Sanatana Dharma. Buddha was a real person and he preached on Dharma, which is exactly the teachings that I follow. And yes, so why can't Brahman be the creator of the eye or the universe as you state? Brahman has no form. This is my point about Brahman and Allah being the same concept potentially but in different languages
@anonymousanonymous2319
@anonymousanonymous2319 2 жыл бұрын
@@davidcoleman6308 no merciful God will invoke eternal damnation when humans were born with free will and we have imperfect knowledge. You live in fear
@anonymousanonymous2319
@anonymousanonymous2319 2 жыл бұрын
@@davidcoleman6308 the word hinduism isn't present in any scriptures either. Correct, religion is a man made concept used to answer questions but you decided to bite the bait just because someone wrote something on a page. Sanatana Dharma is a way of life, it's not a religion
@sashman904
@sashman904 2 жыл бұрын
It's clearly stated that the vedas was written in bank of Ganga.
@hazotsaleh9888
@hazotsaleh9888 3 жыл бұрын
They corrupt it.
@anasjanoo5964
@anasjanoo5964 3 жыл бұрын
ماشاءالله سوره البقره kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rrGdoaxlr7TLcmw.html
@THETESTEDBELIEVER
@THETESTEDBELIEVER 3 жыл бұрын
*THE FIRST NIGHT* .. ‼️‼️😢👇 Imaan rejuvenating kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qJ-betd1ktTMlnU.html
@gauravsharma-ge8lj
@gauravsharma-ge8lj 2 жыл бұрын
That's why we have logics,scientific things and future tells in it.
@Ray-nq9dk
@Ray-nq9dk 2 жыл бұрын
@@gauravsharma-ge8lj ur book says that earth is fixed and sun orbits around it
@kedarbhagat343
@kedarbhagat343 2 жыл бұрын
@@Ray-nq9dk in Hinduism?
@sashman904
@sashman904 2 жыл бұрын
Islam is very clearly defined by one word in our Vedas . And it is "Abidya".
@roarsarch201
@roarsarch201 2 жыл бұрын
No it isn't LMAO. Hinduism is just a bunch of folk lore stories passed down throughout history. It's just greek mythology
@embellishbloomberg272
@embellishbloomberg272 2 жыл бұрын
@@roarsarch201 that's why its still unconqurable 😆right
@roarsarch201
@roarsarch201 2 жыл бұрын
@@embellishbloomberg272 By whom? 😂😂😂
@embellishbloomberg272
@embellishbloomberg272 2 жыл бұрын
@@roarsarch201 you See unlike folk lore stories it isnt forgotten with time its still in practice on a Large scale through all these years and no one is able to destroy it so many conqures failed to capure the land it belongs tgey only got some part of it and at the end they Lost like all others..... And will loose in future till the enternity of time
@roarsarch201
@roarsarch201 2 жыл бұрын
@@embellishbloomberg272 It isn't, though. Nobody even knows where the origin came from, the vedas was supposedly said to be created at the start of time and you carry on discombobulated, fabricated lore stories passed around by people for generations. Do you not understand how fallacious this way of thinking is? Capture what land? Stop talking in hieroglyphics and start speaking up.
@azimgraphy6357
@azimgraphy6357 Жыл бұрын
There may be many intelligent man . Bt in my entire life I have never seen anybody who is more genius than this man.
@dineshchoudhary7098
@dineshchoudhary7098 8 ай бұрын
Any dumb can be more intelligent than him
@robro8057
@robro8057 4 ай бұрын
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 bewakoof
@arnob3167
@arnob3167 3 жыл бұрын
I think he is a miracle of Allah I think Allah gifted him a golden memory to make the people follow to the right path It is only my opinion
@HudaTvChannel
@HudaTvChannel 3 жыл бұрын
Plz Subscribe and Share to share in the reward bit.ly/HudaTv
@samtv6447
@samtv6447 2 жыл бұрын
Your thinking needs some work because all he is saying is bullshit and he still cant prove he the bible is changed or corrupted countless of people have refuted this man
@tawkeer4
@tawkeer4 2 жыл бұрын
bible is corrupted as there are many unscienntific things for example the moon has its own light which is unscientific
@fauzaanahmed8393
@fauzaanahmed8393 2 жыл бұрын
@@samtv6447 May Allah guide you brother
@sush8846
@sush8846 2 жыл бұрын
@@tawkeer4 even quran is not accurate it says earth is flat as per original arabic translators.. it calls it as a plane.. but this Zakir twists the words and says the meaning is ostrich egg. Which many have already refuted. Cz the verse no where has ostrich egg written in it. This guy is just into business of Fooling innocents and money making
@5minutesgaming411
@5minutesgaming411 3 жыл бұрын
Our earth is stile alive for these god gifted god blessed people♥️♥️
@THETESTEDBELIEVER
@THETESTEDBELIEVER 3 жыл бұрын
*THE FIRST NIGHT* .. ‼️‼️😢👇 Imaan rejuvenating kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qJ-betd1ktTMlnU.html
@aptituderec1120
@aptituderec1120 3 жыл бұрын
He is not a blessing he is a curse
@agsitaraman3270
@agsitaraman3270 3 жыл бұрын
these gifted people were not there before 500 ad.still people in the earth were alive
@aptituderec1120
@aptituderec1120 3 жыл бұрын
@@agsitaraman3270 are u hindu
@tpeter5866
@tpeter5866 3 жыл бұрын
The reality is this world is cursed due to the above mentioned people. Rest everything is lies and propaganda.
@mavayalilakathali1684
@mavayalilakathali1684 2 жыл бұрын
14:4 READ THE ABOVE AYAH AND ANALYSE THE MEANING CAREFULY: WAS PROPHET MOHAMMED FLUENT IN MALAYALAM AS ALLAH EXPLAINED IN THIS AYAH SINCE WE MALAYALEES BELIEVE THAT HE IS SENT TO US AS A PROPHET TOO.
@biss6000
@biss6000 2 жыл бұрын
Eh ? Malayalam ?
@r4reviews334
@r4reviews334 2 жыл бұрын
Eh? Malayamo? Athengane
@r4reviews334
@r4reviews334 2 жыл бұрын
@@biss6000 It is language of a state in India called Kerala
@mustafa6860
@mustafa6860 2 жыл бұрын
The messenger of Allah peace and blessings upon him was sent for all of humankind. He was an Arab and only spoke Arabic. Listen carefully and watch this video again. The verse you’re talking about (14:4) explains that Allah sent messengers that spoke the same language as the people they were sent for. May Allah guide us all, forgive us all and gift us all jannatul firdaws. Salaam Alaykum
@Satyajitk
@Satyajitk 2 жыл бұрын
The Earth Does Not Move: 35:41 The Earth is Flat: 18:84-86,89-90 Qur'an 7:54, 13:3, 91:1-4: "He brings the night as a cover over the day. I just covered 3 How many mistakes you guys want in koooooooooran. Qur'an is just bullsh*t The author of Qur'an just tried to copy from other scriptures like the holy Vedas. But he tried to correct some error of vedas (human eyes can see those error but that's true according to science ) like human eyes can't see that the earth is moving. That's why the author of kooooooran wrote the sun and moon orbit around the earth. Human eyes can only see the moon and sun moving. That's why the author of Qur'an wrote the sun orbit around the earth. Human eyes can't see the earth is round That's why he wrote the earth is flat. That mf Allah doesn't even know till now what is gravity. ( Stop reading koooooooooran change your religion or be an atheist.
@drtech9022
@drtech9022 3 жыл бұрын
How can we make an argument on possibilities,if it is the case then why not accept the weak hadith?
@md.amdadulhaquemilon8151
@md.amdadulhaquemilon8151 3 жыл бұрын
Alhamdulillah excellent information..... May Allah help him.
@suriatini3440
@suriatini3440 3 жыл бұрын
Asalamualaikum to all the muslim,,,may Allah swt bless us,Aamiin🤲
@THETESTEDBELIEVER
@THETESTEDBELIEVER 3 жыл бұрын
*THE FIRST NIGHT* .. ‼️‼️😢👇 Imaan rejuvenating kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qJ-betd1ktTMlnU.html
@yusuftoch7493
@yusuftoch7493 3 жыл бұрын
Amiiin ya Allah forgive all muslims
@lolthought6984
@lolthought6984 3 жыл бұрын
Wallaiku Assalam Insha Allah same to u too
@muhammadfaizanjawed9307
@muhammadfaizanjawed9307 2 жыл бұрын
All those Hindus and Muslims fighting in comments section, can't you guys realize that no one wants to go to hell or follow wrong guidance that is not from GOD. All are searching for truth, we all are students and seekers of truth, so instead of fighting, learn more and more about religions of the world to come to the right path.
@muhammadfaizanjawed9307
@muhammadfaizanjawed9307 2 жыл бұрын
@@TheyWeLal salam :)
@muhammadfaizanjawed9307
@muhammadfaizanjawed9307 2 жыл бұрын
@@TheyWeLal my dear brother these are verses from your own holy books :) They enter darkness those who worship natural things. They sink deeper in darkness those who worship sambhuti (created things). (Yajurvedh 40:9). Of Him there are neither parents nor lord." [Svetasvatara Upanishad 6:9] "There is no likeness of Him." [Svetasvatara Upanishad 4:19] That which cannot be seen by the eyes, but by which the eyes see, [Kena Upanishad] The Formless Supreme Spirit that pervades the universe can have no material representation, likeness or image." (Yajur Veda 32:3.) "He is bodiless and pure." [Yajurveda 40:8] His form is not to be seen; no one sees Him with the eye." [Svetasvatara Upanishad 4:20]
@muhammadfaizanjawed9307
@muhammadfaizanjawed9307 2 жыл бұрын
@@TheyWeLal I don't want to argue with you further more, salam! (Peace) Have a good day, bye!
@muhammadfaizanjawed9307
@muhammadfaizanjawed9307 2 жыл бұрын
@@TheyWeLal with due respect brother, if you think these are incorrect translations then I welcome you to post the correct translations of above verses :) I am non Arabic and non Sanskrit speaking person and I didn't picked up these verses from any of videos of zakir naik, I listened Upanishads and did my own research and found these verses . so don't insult anyone's beliefs because that's what not a learning student do. Peace!
@muhammadfaizanjawed9307
@muhammadfaizanjawed9307 2 жыл бұрын
@@TheyWeLal bro, there is no contradiction in Quran the thing you mentioned about creating humans know it very well and I have already searched about it. The human is not created by only one element or by one ingredient etc. Almighty ALLAH in Quran has given the description of the ingredients from which a human is created but the ingredient which is present in every living creature in water and that what is also mentioned in the above verses you posted. Would you like to contact me on my email for further discussion ? I would like to answer all your queries regarding Quran and surely I will also learn from you? Mind doing it bro?
@giftsofislam
@giftsofislam 3 жыл бұрын
Very well answered! MashaAllah
@Satyajitk
@Satyajitk 2 жыл бұрын
The Earth Does Not Move: 35:41 The Earth is Flat: 18:84-86,89-90 Qur'an 7:54, 13:3, 91:1-4: "He brings the night as a cover over the day. I just covered 3 How many mistakes you guys want in koooooooooran. Qur'an is just bullsh*t The author of Qur'an just tried to copy from other scriptures like the holy Vedas. But he tried to correct some error of vedas (human eyes can see those error but that's true according to science ) like human eyes can't see that the earth is moving. That's why the author of kooooooran wrote the sun and moon orbit around the earth. Human eyes can only see the moon and sun moving. That's why the author of Qur'an wrote the sun orbit around the earth. Human eyes can't see the earth is round That's why he wrote the earth is flat. That mf Allah doesn't even know till now what is gravity. ( Stop reading koooooooooran change your religion or be an atheist.
@haasanbismil8723
@haasanbismil8723 2 жыл бұрын
@@Satyajitk bullshit is you and your false allegations....i have given the answer of that in some other comment ...u should check it out
@scixn69
@scixn69 Жыл бұрын
@@Satyajitk Let's have a debate it seems like you've just completed your grade 1
@parmardipak6099
@parmardipak6099 3 жыл бұрын
Truth is pathless land, u can't achieve by following some , particular book, because many people enlighten without following any book, just practice
@mohdshariq5814
@mohdshariq5814 3 жыл бұрын
What to practice??
@mohdshariq5814
@mohdshariq5814 3 жыл бұрын
Anything leave u nowhere
@mohdshariq5814
@mohdshariq5814 3 жыл бұрын
@Shrjjdjidj Jdnjdjdjdj 🤣😃🤣😃🤣😃🤣
@logicalthinker483
@logicalthinker483 3 жыл бұрын
Well, can you truly achieve it? Not in this age! You are already exposed to lots of other information and biases that can manipulate you! So if you say that do not follow a particular book, have you done your comparative study research? Thats the question to be asked !
@logicalthinker483
@logicalthinker483 3 жыл бұрын
@Illuminati you want Prophets to be angels or what?
@anwarhawk839
@anwarhawk839 3 жыл бұрын
Poem: How Could We Take Non-Muslim as Our Friends? After non-Muslim learn to stand up They become quarrelsome with Allah And they want us to tell "Allah created nothing" Or they want us to tell "gray hair would cover the head of Allah. And Allah took a son" How could we take the non-Muslim as our friend? Hijab gives our lady's dignity Some of them call it oppressive. How could we take them as our friends? Jesus mother's Mary Should be an example for the non-Muslim ladies No one abled to see her body But still, they called it as oppressive How could we take them as our friends? Gamble, wine and unlawful sex They don't consider it as against the teaching of Jesus We called it a sinful act How could we take them as our friends? Iron floats in water due to accompany with a floating substance We will step in to do the sinful act because of them, How could we take non-Muslim as our friends? Our aim is to go to Paradise. They call us to go to the hellfire. How could Muslims take non-Muslim as their friends? Muslims can't harm the non-Muslim Only should invite them Hope they also put effort to go to Paradise. If they would not try to understand We should remind them They are not our friends. Read more poems from hahabook.net
@riyazazam1423
@riyazazam1423 3 жыл бұрын
Because we are humans. Our prophet pbuh made every effort to convince his uncle to believe in Allah and his message. But they rejected. That is the beauty of islam.
@Dharma20941
@Dharma20941 2 жыл бұрын
look at absolute stupidity of human minds we first discriminate people as muslims and non muslims then we ask how to deal with this problem.
@meherprudhvi9368
@meherprudhvi9368 2 жыл бұрын
@@Dharma20941 God this is what people need to realize
@eternalexecutioner6941
@eternalexecutioner6941 2 жыл бұрын
What people need to realize is that Islam is fucked up
@neilcastro836
@neilcastro836 3 жыл бұрын
Dr Zakir Naike with all due respect it might be better and more appropriate to say that the people failed to preserve the scriptures because of corruptions made by men after Allah perhaps entrusted the preservation of the scriptures.
@anasalam1912
@anasalam1912 9 ай бұрын
the preservation of those scriptures was not needed because the coming of last revelation was fixed.
@abdulkaiyum522
@abdulkaiyum522 3 жыл бұрын
This was a tricky question
@nafisashakir9868
@nafisashakir9868 Жыл бұрын
Allah Subhanahu, hame Islam ki sahi baatein samajne ki Nek toufeeq ata Farmaiy.🤲
@aymenusman1980
@aymenusman1980 Жыл бұрын
Mashallah Dr.Zahir Naik did alot for the Muslim ummah May Allah add him more knowledge. But He needs to study Aqeedah & Usool al Fiqh coz In islam words like “May be, I think, I feel, in my opinion….etc” Doesn’t have place. We don’t govern by opinions nor by how someone feels. It’s always Quran and sunnah!!
@TheSumtrek
@TheSumtrek Жыл бұрын
Your brain is made in china 😁
@sikandernaheem9523
@sikandernaheem9523 Жыл бұрын
De Zakir Naik said "may be" because it is not mentioned in Quran that Vedas are the word of God. That's why he said MAY BE Vedas were the words of God for those people of that time or not..
@entkalb557
@entkalb557 Жыл бұрын
He reminds me of my father who passed away 2 months ago. My father was a huge fan of dr Zakir Naik's work. May Allah have mercy on them both ameen ❤
@gdhanraj5144
@gdhanraj5144 Жыл бұрын
your father{peace be upon his soul} got revelation , this guy was donkey and your father knew it
@alishbista1748
@alishbista1748 10 ай бұрын
It's so sad to see your father wasted his time on bullshit. He ran from the live stream when, adam asked him to join.🤣
@theRsjewellers3565
@theRsjewellers3565 Жыл бұрын
I saw many vdos of hindus about anusashan parv saying there is no message for eating meat
@saqlainshah6867
@saqlainshah6867 Жыл бұрын
One of the brilliant answers ever
@SAJEDMUNIR
@SAJEDMUNIR 3 жыл бұрын
*Allah does not become His creation, nor does He change His nature.* Christians believe that Allah the All-Mighty, and the All Powerful became a baby and got His nappy changed by Mary. Allah said: "How can I have children when I have got no wife?" Qur'an Surah 6 Verse 101 and Allah is unique and there is nothing like Him. Qur'an Surah 112. Also read in Qur'an Surah Maidah 5 Verses 110 to 120 where the miracles of Jesus (pbuh) were done by Allah. Also read the mother of Jesus in the Qur'an Surah Maryam 19 explaining that Jesus (pbuh) is a prophet and messenger of Allah. *NOTES: Please can you read the Al-Hilali and Muhsin Khan translation of the Qur'an.*
@r4reviews334
@r4reviews334 2 жыл бұрын
Assalamualikum Is it English translation?
@ankitdasgupta9326
@ankitdasgupta9326 2 жыл бұрын
Those who know the truth will know that the answer is in the question (caption) itself. 😉
@sush8846
@sush8846 2 жыл бұрын
Really 😂 there is no mention of mohommad in Vedas or gita.. he is Linking kalki avatar with mohommad. When kalki avatar is going to be a form of God .. and these people don't consider mohommad to be god.. if he considers mohommad to be kalki then he has already proved by thatt logic that Quran is fake bt it as its basic nature refutes that there could be any living God in earth, not even as incarnation .😂. What a Business man! It's so easy to make money' out if people who are blinded by religion.. 😂 great business!🔥👏
@MS-xk6wz
@MS-xk6wz 2 жыл бұрын
@@sush8846Joke is on u .. U changed ur books it may originally have mentioned not that kali will be god but a messanger of god
@deadsoul4811
@deadsoul4811 2 жыл бұрын
@@sush8846 in hindu scripture it is also written Krishna ra*ed vrinda Shiva to mohini. Brahma to daughter sarswati And were lusty. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣. Blind bhkats are loser
@s.k9837
@s.k9837 2 жыл бұрын
@@deadsoul4811 Roses are red Violets are blue Ayesha was 6 Muhammed was 52
@roarsarch201
@roarsarch201 2 жыл бұрын
@@s.k9837 Critics allege that Aisha was just six years old when she was betrothed to Muhammad, himself in his 50s, and only nine when the marriage was consummated. They base this on a saying attributed to Aisha herself (Sahih Bukhari volume 5, book 58, number 234), and the debate on this issue is further complicated by the fact that some Muslims believe this to be a historically accurate account. Although most Muslims would not consider marrying off their nine-year-old daughters, those who accept this saying argue that since the Qur'an states that marriage is void unless entered into by consenting adults, Aisha must have entered puberty early. They point out that, in seventh-century Arabia, adulthood was defined as the onset of puberty. (This much is true, and was also the case in Europe: five centuries after Muhammad's marriage to Aisha, 33-year-old King John of England married 12-year-old Isabella of Angoulême.) Interestingly, of the many criticisms of Muhammad made at the time by his opponents, none focused on Aisha's age at marriage. According to this perspective, Aisha may have been young, but she was not younger than was the norm at the time. Other Muslims doubt the very idea that Aisha was six at the time of marriage, referring to historians who have questioned the reliability of Aisha's age as given in the saying. In a society without a birth registry and where people did not celebrate birthdays, most people estimated their own age and that of others. Aisha would have been no different. What's more, Aisha had already been engaged to someone else before she married Muhammad, suggesting she had already been mature enough by the standards of her society to consider marriage for a while. It seems difficult to reconcile this with her being six. In addition, some modern Muslim scholars have more recently cast doubt on the veracity of the saying, or hadith, used to assert Aisha's young age. In Islam, the hadith literature (sayings of the prophet) is considered secondary to the Qur'an. While the Qur'an is considered to be the verbatim word of God, the hadiths were transmitted over time through a rigorous but not infallible methodology. Taking all known accounts and records of Aisha's age at marriage, estimates of her age range from nine to 19. Because of this, it is impossible to know with any certainty how old Aisha was. What we do know is what the Qur'an says about marriage: that it is valid only between consenting adults, and that a woman has the right to choose her own spouse. As the living embodiment of Islam, Muhammad's actions reflect the Qur'an's teachings on marriage, even if the actions of some Muslim regimes and individuals do not. Sadly, in many countries, the imperatives motivating the marriage of young girls are typically economic. In others, they are political. The fact that Iran and Saudi Arabia have both sought to use the saying concerning Aisha's age as a justification for lowering the legal age of marriage tells us a great deal about the patriarchal and oppressive nature of those regimes, and nothing about Muhammad, or the essential nature of Islam. The stridency of those who lend credence to these literalist interpretations by concurring with their warped view of Islam does not help those Muslims who seek to challenge these aberrations. The Islamophobic depiction of Muhammad's marriage to Aisha as motivated by misplaced desire fits within a broader Orientalist depiction of Muhammad as a philanderer. This idea dates back to the crusades. According to the academic Kecia Ali: "Accusations of lust and sensuality were a regular feature of medieval attacks on the prophet's character and, by extension, on the authenticity of Islam." Since the early Christians heralded Christ as a model of celibate virtue, Muhammad - who had married several times - was deemed to be driven by sinful lust. This portrayal ignored the fact that before his marriage to Aisha, Muhammad had been married to Khadija, a powerful businesswoman 15 years his senior, for 25 years. When she died, he was devastated and friends encouraged him to remarry. A female acquaintance suggested Aisha, a bright and vivacious character. Aisha's union would also have cemented Muhammad's longstanding friendship with her father, Abu Bakr. As was the tradition in Arabia (and still is in some parts of the world today), marriage typically served a social and political function - a way of uniting tribes, resolving feuds, caring for widows and orphans, and generally strengthening bonds in a highly unstable and changing political environment. Of the women Muhammad married, the majority were widows. To consider the marriages of the prophet outside of these calculations is profoundly ahistorical. What the records are clear on is that Muhammad and Aisha had a loving and egalitarian relationship, which set the standard for reciprocity, tenderness and respect enjoined by the Qur'an. Insights into their relationship, such as the fact they liked to drink out of the same cup or race one another, are indicative of a deep connection which belies any misrepresentation of their relationship. To paint Aisha as a victim is completely at odds with her persona. She was certainly no wallflower. During a controversial battle in Muslim history, she emerged riding a camel to lead the troops. She was known for her assertive temperament and mischievous sense of humour - with Muhammad sometimes bearing the brunt of the jokes. During his lifetime, he established her authority by telling Muslims to consult her in his absence; after his death, she went to be become one of the most prolific and distinguished scholars of her time. A stateswoman, scholar, mufti, and judge, Aisha combined spirituality, activism and knowledge and remains a role model for many Muslim women today. The gulf between her true legacy and her depiction in Islamophobic materials is not merely historically inaccurate, it is an insult to the memory of a pioneering woman. Those who manipulate her story to justify the abuse of young girls, and those who manipulate it in order to depict Islam as a religion that legitimises such abuse have more in common than they think. Both demonstrate a disregard for what we know about the times in which Muhammad lived, and for the affirmation of female autonomy which her story illustrates. So yes, it is a perfect religion. If you didn't have the brain the size of a pea maybe you could comprehend and understand history and knowledge.
@osiris9843
@osiris9843 Жыл бұрын
Bhagwat Gita, Ramayana and all the vedas were written almost 2500 year before the Muhammad came....muslim is a modern civilization with old ethics.... There is no space of comparison
@manavaditya6008
@manavaditya6008 3 жыл бұрын
This man knows the real thing but sharing only the influencial parts. Written by gods!! They are just the words of mere kings willing to operate a larger part. Either bibal or quaran or the once before and after that. But for judaism,hinduism,buddhism You just can't say this coz they were written by people who never ruled after.
@pushpajaiswal3962
@pushpajaiswal3962 2 жыл бұрын
For your kind of information u r all wrong better read n do some research before u comment
@manavaditya6008
@manavaditya6008 2 жыл бұрын
@@pushpajaiswal3962 im doing this research from 4-5 years. Not on KZfaq or from scholars But from texts and peoples
@manavaditya6008
@manavaditya6008 2 жыл бұрын
From age of 13 im reading about the. Concept of god. 7 years from then and im still reading stuffs from different religions and places
@asrabmiah376
@asrabmiah376 2 жыл бұрын
A little knowledge is destructive
@manavaditya6008
@manavaditya6008 2 жыл бұрын
@@asrabmiah376 yes i too feel reading more than 200religious books on islam sanatan judaism greeks and Christianity is very little ... Im thinking of listing to religious gurus and then do judgemental comments, will it be good then?
@adityavarma7501
@adityavarma7501 3 жыл бұрын
The only problem with your argument is, sanatan dharma predates every other 'revelation'
@salimr4718
@salimr4718 3 жыл бұрын
his argument includes sanatan dharma.
@adityavarma7501
@adityavarma7501 3 жыл бұрын
@@salimr4718 santana dharma predates every other religion therefore it can't be copies from any other "book"
@satyamsinghrajpoot8642
@satyamsinghrajpoot8642 3 жыл бұрын
@@salimr4718 u are blind follower of Dr zakir naik u have no guts to boycott china .China plundered many mosques in its own country.still u people are boycotting France bcoz of cartoon 😂😂😂😂😂😂 WTF
@salimr4718
@salimr4718 3 жыл бұрын
@@satyamsinghrajpoot8642 @Satyam Singh Rajpoot I am not a "follower" per se of Zakir Naik but appreciate his work. The Hindus or people of other religions who have converted to Islam after listening to his talks were not forced to do so in any way. They were convinced and converted because his arguments ring true. Instead of nurturing hatred towards him, because that is perhaps what the environment you are living in incites you to do , consider his arguments and do your own research. If you think he is wrong, why not write to him and objectively pinpoint where he went astray. I am sure he will welcome your questions. I am already boycotting China, India and France as much as I humanly can and I encourage other Muslims to do the same. And these boycotts are not because of hatred towards these nations and their people, it is because of their policies towards Muslims. If tomorrow they were to change their policies, I would change my stance towards them also. Each of us have only one life and the only thing we are all certain of is that we will die one day, sooner or later. Make this certainty your focus and open your mind to other viewpoints. What if you die and you were to discover that what you believed in was wrong, and the ones whom you hated had been right all along? You have only one chance at figuring this out. Don't ruin it.
@hadooken1194
@hadooken1194 3 жыл бұрын
@@adityavarma7501 well predating doesn't affirms authenticity. Also if they were authentic then there should be no contradiction in that yet we find a lot of contradictions in it.
@sikandernaheem9523
@sikandernaheem9523 Жыл бұрын
I was highly in search of this question...Now bcoz of Dr. Zakir Naik I got the answer,🤩
@Rashisy81i5
@Rashisy81i5 5 ай бұрын
That bastard Naik is absconding from India. If his almighty Allah cannot save him from mortal government agencies then I can confidently say his beliefs are of no use.
@broadcastwithatg5195
@broadcastwithatg5195 2 жыл бұрын
Those people and that time also apply in Islam because there are many extremist doing wrong thing and start verses of quran,
@neoneherefrom5836
@neoneherefrom5836 Жыл бұрын
Dawah 101 Everything is “corrupt” except the parts where we can force a square peg into a round hole and call it our own.
@kanthan3ppr
@kanthan3ppr 3 жыл бұрын
Ask yourselves which is the oldest books, Hindu scholars know how old they are and they are very old....way older than Islam and Quran.
@mdbaseem01
@mdbaseem01 3 жыл бұрын
I think you are fool we believe in Jesus now think how old we are , we believe in Moses now think how old we are ,we believe in Harun ..... we believe in david ......., suleman.... first person Adam ... Islam is starts with First Human but final revolution is 1442yrs old that is QURAN
@suprovo5117
@suprovo5117 3 жыл бұрын
@@mdbaseem01 vedas were written over 1700 BCE before any of the holy Prophets it's word of God and Revealed by God Rigveda is oldest recorded scriptures till date.
@suprovo5117
@suprovo5117 3 жыл бұрын
@@mdbaseem01 Adam is just a religious notion there's no way Adam and Eve alone can populate so much. Believe in Allah not some corrupted version of Quran. Allah Hu Akbar
@mdbaseem01
@mdbaseem01 3 жыл бұрын
@@suprovo5117 oldest as record ok I believe ,but you fool ,who tells you at that time there is no prophet we believe in Jesus Moses, david nuh yakub jakiriya.......first person Adam is also a messenger of ALLAH
@suprovo5117
@suprovo5117 3 жыл бұрын
@@mdbaseem01 mosses-1500 BCE , David-1010 BCE and Rest of them Around that time. Vedas were written somewhere between 2500 BCE - 1200 BCE so it's pretty old and some vedas don't even have mentioned date of composition or revealtion by God
@R0binVayne
@R0binVayne 3 жыл бұрын
We have judgement day written in our hinduism long before even Jesus existed and the coming of kalki. God sent his messengers to every civilization and how ever one worships his god the fruit of that worship reaches the one god thats what is said in gita there is no other god than vishnu the one god almighty and our books never mention idol worship and even in gita its forbidden to worship any other god than vishnu and till now we dont keep any idols of vishnu.
@nirajsuryawanshi9113
@nirajsuryawanshi9113 3 жыл бұрын
But we also keep other God's idols. What about that? Is that forbidden?
@owaisibraheem1389
@owaisibraheem1389 3 жыл бұрын
Vishnu is just the preserver! Who'd give life to the dead then? And destroy the current world?
@HudaTvChannel
@HudaTvChannel 3 жыл бұрын
Please Subscribe and Share .. May Allah Reward You Immensely! bit.ly/HudaTv
@kishorepatil5587
@kishorepatil5587 3 жыл бұрын
Relaxe they are willing to be cheated, so they follow cheaters.Bhagavad Gita is beyond their capacity of intelligence to understand.
@duck1666
@duck1666 2 жыл бұрын
Well. That's a really narrow understanding of Hinduism
@makrandkashikar8555
@makrandkashikar8555 4 ай бұрын
Why it is corrupted if you cant prove? Only Bhagwat geeta is the word of and from God itself. Dont worry Islam will also vanquish one day as that is the rule of God.
@mr.anonymous1087
@mr.anonymous1087 Жыл бұрын
So can it also mean that there can be another messenger from God and the current Quran is only ment for the people of this time. If so then can't Quran also under go change for the coming generations?
@ceti_9998
@ceti_9998 14 күн бұрын
Perfect explenation brother Zakir Naik!!! My best friends who were hindu before and now came to islam just proved that their books were man made and found tons of contradictions and proved that their idols are made by people and dont exist.🤍
@asmanazir8833
@asmanazir8833 3 жыл бұрын
Mashallah Nice , Agree.
@THETESTEDBELIEVER
@THETESTEDBELIEVER 3 жыл бұрын
*THE FIRST NIGHT* .. ‼️‼️😢👇 Imaan rejuvenating kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qJ-betd1ktTMlnU.html
@king-gd2hh
@king-gd2hh 3 жыл бұрын
Muhammad is not mentioned anywhere in Hinduism
@creppygoi1955
@creppygoi1955 3 жыл бұрын
@@king-gd2hh oh really.. search it and then come here
@king-gd2hh
@king-gd2hh 3 жыл бұрын
@@creppygoi1955 I have already done research
@clashwithlegendary4046
@clashwithlegendary4046 3 жыл бұрын
@@king-gd2hh mentionedcin bavishya purana
@Muhammad--kg8yl
@Muhammad--kg8yl 3 жыл бұрын
💓 جزاكم الله خيرا 💓 🌻اللهم صل وسلم وبارك على سيدنا محمد وعلى آله وأصحابه وسلم عدد خلقك ورضا نفسك وزنة عرش إمداد كلماتك فى كل وقت وحين 🌷
@farhanalamia9520
@farhanalamia9520 Жыл бұрын
Allahumma barek ❤️
@Zeeshanshabbir6296
@Zeeshanshabbir6296 11 ай бұрын
Sir in Hinduism book have written many Scientific things how ??? Plz reply 🙏
@fidelcatsro6948
@fidelcatsro6948 3 жыл бұрын
Takbeer!!
@THETESTEDBELIEVER
@THETESTEDBELIEVER 3 жыл бұрын
*THE FIRST NIGHT* .. ‼️‼️😢👇 Imaan rejuvenating kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qJ-betd1ktTMlnU.html
@momohamed229
@momohamed229 3 жыл бұрын
Allahu akbar
@dineshbabu15696
@dineshbabu15696 3 жыл бұрын
Vedas is eternal Vedvyaas wrote it before 10 thousands years in dropayug But before that it was given by Brahma to sant by oral only
@muhammedrashidnm4438
@muhammedrashidnm4438 3 жыл бұрын
Not looking at Zakir naik please research on your on way.Its your life
@anantthecrunk
@anantthecrunk 2 ай бұрын
i completely agree with you sir . There are many things in Tulsidas Ramayan which are not even present in the first ramayan
@Souravandsujitra
@Souravandsujitra 2 жыл бұрын
Tarak vs Dr Naik . One debate world wanted to see
@Uda961
@Uda961 3 жыл бұрын
Sir, how come supreme knowledge of Veda books are forgotten by Allah to be mention in quran
@HudaTvChannel
@HudaTvChannel 3 жыл бұрын
Spread the Goodness. Subscribe & Share. May Allah Bless You! bit.ly/HudaTv
@ikeakumastan
@ikeakumastan 3 жыл бұрын
The knowledge of other books are not mentioned in the Quran but Quran does say there were many other books previously. Besides, why should the old teachings be mentioned after making new ones??
@seenaatayee2057
@seenaatayee2057 3 жыл бұрын
@Udaykumar
@seenaatayee2057
@seenaatayee2057 3 жыл бұрын
@Udaykumar if you say veda has supreme knowledge In quran in verse 23 said that if you say this words are not saying of god bring only one chapter like this or one sentence
@suvx2z381
@suvx2z381 3 жыл бұрын
@@seenaatayee2057 Did you read Vedas or Bhagavat Geeta. The whole books and all the verses in them are better composed than quran, the chapters and verses are fully relevant to one another, and everything is perfectly explained by God himself. Please do read Vedas or Bhagavat Geeta once in your life. You will understand what I am saying.
@user-vm1xm1ch7p
@user-vm1xm1ch7p 3 жыл бұрын
Glad to see Dr.Zakir healthy
@eternalexecutioner6941
@eternalexecutioner6941 2 жыл бұрын
Yes me too, as long as he is in good shape he can provide me more material on how to prove that Islam is not peaceful
@Abdullahmosalim
@Abdullahmosalim Жыл бұрын
@@eternalexecutioner6941how is it not peaceful? Provide proof next time bud
@guanlong6699
@guanlong6699 Жыл бұрын
I just thought that one of the many unnamed prophets that was sent to India had their teachings and proclamations twisted and assimilated into hinduism.
@BirendraKc-go1mn
@BirendraKc-go1mn 11 ай бұрын
These are The People Who are corrupting The Great Holy Quran and This Man's Fan 😂😂😂😂
@eternal_vibration.
@eternal_vibration. 2 жыл бұрын
One God OM 🕉️. GOD G= Generator (Brhama) O= Observer (Vishnu) D = Destroyer (Shiva)
@Halal_Dan
@Halal_Dan 2 жыл бұрын
"one god" >names three gods
@eternal_vibration.
@eternal_vibration. 2 жыл бұрын
@@Halal_Dan yea if they mix with each other then it's OM or Infinite Universal Matter. (GOD)
@Halal_Dan
@Halal_Dan 2 жыл бұрын
@@eternal_vibration. There's no point in worshipping any of them, they can't do anything by themselves
@gctb649
@gctb649 2 жыл бұрын
So do you have only one god image on your pooja room?,
@anonymousstudio8119
@anonymousstudio8119 Жыл бұрын
Yes, God word is used in Sanskrit
@sandeshlohana6436
@sandeshlohana6436 Жыл бұрын
He himself proves how Quran copied some other scriptures
@user-gn7gw8zt5d
@user-gn7gw8zt5d 5 ай бұрын
All of it was written by god, so how is it copied? Dumb
@hahaloser3914
@hahaloser3914 2 ай бұрын
so according to haters, quran copied bible,torah, hinduism holy scripture, buddism holy scripture etc 🤣🤣and still perfect without all thoose religions contradictions and errors
@ZrixE_69420
@ZrixE_69420 Жыл бұрын
In hinduism. Main god is shiva. If we replace the v into b. It turns into shiba. Shiba is a korean word. It means the f word
@east2west2east
@east2west2east Жыл бұрын
Don't talk about Hindu scriptures because I have read them and in bhavisya puran Mahamad (not Mohammad) is used for a Demon so if you are comparing it then you should be careful or else who cares.
@laeequenadvi4746
@laeequenadvi4746 3 жыл бұрын
Prophet Mohammad (pbuh) is mentioned in oldest religious books of Hindu as Kalki Avtar(کلکی اوتار) -- last prophet. The Vedas are 4000 /4500 years old according to Hindu scholars of Vedas. Dr. Zakir Naik made it very clear in his lectures on Kalki Avtar refering to to their original references--- Vedas. The details mentioned in Hindu's scriptures are astonishing. We do not find so much details in any other religious scriptures. What is the real source of these detail? Who could have told all these facts 4500 years ago . Ofcource no common man but a prophet.Who is that prophet? It comes to my mind that may be ‌‌نوح عليه السلام( prophet Noah). (pbuh). He is the oldest prophet mentioned in Torah and in Qur'an. Hindus know Mano. Who is this Mano ( منو )؟ May be Noah. Allah knows best. DR.MOHAMMAD LAEEQUE NADVI Ph.D. (Arabic Lit.) M.A. Arabic Lit.+Islamic Studies) DIRECTOR Amena Institute of Islamic Studies & Analysis A Global & Universal Institute Donate to promote this Institute SBI A/C30029616117 Kolkata,Park Circus Branch nadvilaeeque@gmail.com Thanks
@raaz43
@raaz43 2 жыл бұрын
So dude... Kalki avtar means.. The GOD.. In our religion avtar is considered the form of GOD who take birth on earth to protect us... But you people don't consider him GOD he's just a messanger for you .. If Zakir naik has proved that he's kalki.. Then say Him GOD..
@kaviya2844
@kaviya2844 Жыл бұрын
Lol.. Kalki didn't born yet. And it's clearly mentioned he is avatar not prophet.
@niyaa_vlogs
@niyaa_vlogs 2 жыл бұрын
Subhanallah. Allahu Akbar😭💕
@afoley2812
@afoley2812 Жыл бұрын
Any good psychic or seer can foresee the future and take note of it. Such writings are not necessarily the word of God. Moreover the word of God is usually in the first person.
@blackoctopus5182
@blackoctopus5182 Жыл бұрын
The scripture of Quran is in 1st person 2nd person and 3rd person, and all of it is word of god, also it can be the prophecy of a messenger of god, and that is more likely than to be the word of god himself
@kabirsingh1411
@kabirsingh1411 2 жыл бұрын
We have sent messengers before you, and gave them wives and children. It is not for a messenger to bring a verse without the will of Allah. For every age there are some rules prescribed i think this written in 13:38
@arkadashh
@arkadashh 3 жыл бұрын
Flaming candle and the lamp on the left side are really distractive
@mohsinq86
@mohsinq86 3 жыл бұрын
Very well explained 👍. As revealed in Quran, Allah has sent prophets from time to time since the creation of the Earth, but the message of Allah were corrupted as time went by. The Quran being the final revelation which can be memorised, thus preserved in original form.
@srnp0007
@srnp0007 3 жыл бұрын
Allah were corrupted as time went by..................." But Why Allah Couldn't Prevent Those Scriptures form corruption ?
@mohsinq86
@mohsinq86 3 жыл бұрын
@@srnp0007 Allah has been sending prophets from the beginning even before people could read or write. Subsequently message from prophets were recorded by humans & distorted/changed as time went by. Since Mohammad being last prophet, Quran was revealed by Allah through Angel & is written in a way no man could write. It’s a message which can easily be memorised even by a child & therefore preserved without any changes. As per Allah, all 1,24,000 prophets have been giving same message.
@srnp0007
@srnp0007 3 жыл бұрын
@@mohsinq86 :- But My Question is Why Allah Didn't Preserve the FIRST Message itself ?
@mohsinq86
@mohsinq86 3 жыл бұрын
@@srnp0007 as per the revelations in Jabur, Tora, Bible & Quran, cities were destroyed when ever sin use to increase & people use to move away from path of Allah (Creator). Therefore prophets were being sent by message of Allah periodically. Now as mentioned in Quran & other books mentioned above, Mohammad is the last prophet with the message of Allah (Quran) for all mankind before kayamah(Doomsday). The issue is that Christians & Jews don’t believe that Mohammad is that last prophet & are still waiting for him to come. Please go through all religions with open mind & see which makes more sense to you & follow that. As simple as that. Never put down or criticise others beliefs. Choosing a religion is your choice. Don’t follow blindly just because you are born in a religion.
@srnp0007
@srnp0007 3 жыл бұрын
@@mohsinq86 :- My Friend , Again You Have Ignored My Question ? What''s Wrong With You ? I Asked You A Simple Question.
@syedtahamohiuddin3160
@syedtahamohiuddin3160 6 ай бұрын
Great explanation ❤
@PratibhaSah
@PratibhaSah 2 жыл бұрын
In Vedas nowhere mention the word Mohammed.....he thinks Aham means Mohammed but Aham is a Sankrit word that means 'I'.....kindly u guys don't give false knowledge to your people our culture is vast and deep that your mind will not understand.
@Dharma20941
@Dharma20941 2 жыл бұрын
no book in hinduism talk about muhammad. KALKI AVATAR lifestory is not same as muhammad which is described fully in kalki purana vedas doesnot describe a specific person because the only words that describe anything is either name of god like indra,agni,varuna etc none of which is related to muhammad. Narasamsa in vedas is a word used for agni [lord of fire] similarly other claims are myths anybody reading vedas and other book of hinduism knows that.
@shamboize
@shamboize 3 жыл бұрын
EXACTLY WHAT I WAS SAYING
@jaigurudattasrigurudatta4763
@jaigurudattasrigurudatta4763 2 жыл бұрын
When you don't know when Vedas came how can you it's verses are changed ohoo to support Quran🤣
@eternal_vibration.
@eternal_vibration. 2 жыл бұрын
Zakir fool don't know that vedic text came first then his quran was written 🤣. Makka was a temple of GOD Shiva and they made my GOD their GOD. OM 🕉️ First = AUM Second 🥈
@bruhmoment8336
@bruhmoment8336 3 жыл бұрын
Answered a question I've been thinking of thank you dr zakir naik.
@aptituderec1120
@aptituderec1120 3 жыл бұрын
He didn't ans it properly u moron use u r brain if vedas is for people of that time then islam is for people of Arabia 1400years ago and yoga , plastic surgery, architecture, shampoo etc all have roots to vedas
@danxterglobe8823
@danxterglobe8823 3 жыл бұрын
@@aptituderec1120 tell me one thing in quran which isnt acceptable for todays world :) dont be arrogant brother!!! Zakir naik is just pointing out his views its your decision to buy it or not! Have a good day
@creppygoi1955
@creppygoi1955 3 жыл бұрын
@@aptituderec1120 the book of guidance, didn't started coming from 1400 years ago... There were arabs before it also .. so you better keep your empty brain with you
@aptituderec1120
@aptituderec1120 3 жыл бұрын
@@danxterglobe8823 one mistake I can give bunch of them kzfaq.info/get/bejne/bJ1nn7CJ0cvVh30.html watch it
@aptituderec1120
@aptituderec1120 3 жыл бұрын
@@creppygoi1955 they were Arabs I never said they were not but quran came afterwards I don't have empty brain u moron use u r brain start thinking
@atlasalifaduru7741
@atlasalifaduru7741 3 жыл бұрын
Mashallah
@kapilsharma1293
@kapilsharma1293 2 жыл бұрын
So If I take example of those people who Brutally killed thousands of innocent kids, Killed thousands of Men and Women. Mercilessly raped thousands of Women and Girls. People who are a pure form of devil, they all can be forgiven if they says ' SubhanAllahi wa Bihamdihi' 100 times after doing all those sins? Is Allah allowed that killed everyone on the earth or raped Women which is one of beautiful creation by Allah and just say 'SubhanAllahi wa Bihamdihi' 100 times and you will be forgiven? I really want to understnd the psychology behind this mentality?
@tafhim.a.982
@tafhim.a.982 Жыл бұрын
Well explained👍
@annukumari4936
@annukumari4936 2 жыл бұрын
Hindu name is given by foregier.. Real name is sanatan, which means the religion who never birth and never die... 🥰
@shortinformation6073
@shortinformation6073 3 жыл бұрын
You say gita or vedas or bible was courpted by human . It is possible Quran also corrupted verses by human .
@behappy1168
@behappy1168 3 жыл бұрын
May be it was also written by human that we will preserve Quran by corrupting it
@shortinformation6073
@shortinformation6073 3 жыл бұрын
@@behappy1168 I think they use quran for assuming political power on name of islam . They lead army on name of religion , terrorist also doing same thing. I think islam is also true religion but that maulana currpted religion and turn as political islam .
@behappy1168
@behappy1168 3 жыл бұрын
@@shortinformation6073 yes there are many contrasting verse one In good other is bad I think It is corrupted
@shortinformation6073
@shortinformation6073 3 жыл бұрын
@@behappy1168 but I don't think that are corrupted by accidentally , that verses currpted for political purpose so today 57 country has different interpretation of verses according to to needs.
@behappy1168
@behappy1168 3 жыл бұрын
@@shortinformation6073 yes maybe
@mr.anonymous1087
@mr.anonymous1087 Жыл бұрын
Mahn I would really like to go back in time and see if all these things are true or not.
@hudaibialnoman
@hudaibialnoman 2 ай бұрын
Yes,Prophet Mohammed was Avatar of Vishnu.
@faizekhan5223
@faizekhan5223 3 жыл бұрын
Alhamdulilah
@Sunny-lc4vk
@Sunny-lc4vk 2 жыл бұрын
In the beginning of the world, self-existent God revealed the Vedas which are eternal and divine. - Mahābhārata, Śānti-parva 224.55
@christianprince4508
@christianprince4508 3 жыл бұрын
Torah copied from Jewish Bible Ingeel copied from Christian Bible Revelation copied from Christian Bible But Muhammad added his words by changing their names and tiles which can only be possible after..
@christianprince4508
@christianprince4508 3 жыл бұрын
@SNIPER SNIPER Do u need proof... For copying the stories of Bible..
@jey2275
@jey2275 3 жыл бұрын
@Nasser K much of the Quran is copied from the apocrypha , which is rejected by the scholars of the highest eminence and did not qualify as a reliable historic writings.
@jamworthy14
@jamworthy14 Жыл бұрын
this is basic knowledge every muslim should know.
@luckiestone5007
@luckiestone5007 2 жыл бұрын
Vedas are greatest of all time . Even in arabs before islam in persian empire holy book ' avesta' is very much similer to vedas knowledge and language also very much similer to vedas. Islam creation is just a propogenda for unit people and chase area aginst christian and others empire .
@naveenmuthiahraja4598
@naveenmuthiahraja4598 3 жыл бұрын
U know only quaran u experience god u didn't so pls don't tlk
@meherprudhvi9368
@meherprudhvi9368 3 жыл бұрын
To experience god is to experience oneness (Tauhid). This is in every religion.
@yellowbasket2334
@yellowbasket2334 3 жыл бұрын
brother if you don't know the spellings you should not type. He is not perfect and he accepts it. If he was stupid he would not have been exiled by hindu govt. #THEgovtFEAREDtheTRUTH
@pubguc6771
@pubguc6771 3 ай бұрын
What is there's policy without general scientific from joint group of general scientific and others
@RS-ni7wd
@RS-ni7wd Жыл бұрын
Which hindu scripture mentions about prophet muhammad? I want to know the name of that scripture
@shamshushaash5251
@shamshushaash5251 Жыл бұрын
Bhavishya puraaana
@RS-ni7wd
@RS-ni7wd Жыл бұрын
@@shamshushaash5251 Ok, so in Bhavishya Purana, we are talking about the Pratisargaparvan. It consists of 100 chapters and there are few things that must be kept in mind 1. Pratisargaparvan is not exactly a sanatani scripture, but more like a historical record. It starts with ancient history, then goes to medieval, and finally to modern history. 2. It also talks about Timur and how muslim invasions devastated India. These outsiders who invaded India are termed as Mlecchas. 3. Pratisargaparvan also makes some key comparison between the Sanatan Dharm and the religion brought in the Indian land by the mlecchas. 4. Yes, it talks about Mahamad (Muhammad). But he is also considered a mleccha, who is considered the last prophet, by the mleccha population. Pratisargaparvan is not saying Mahamad is the last prophet, but it is just writing down, what people from arab and Afghan world were talking, about Mahamad, after entering India. 5. Now Sanatan dharma was started by Indus Valley people and was expanded during the vedic age. So anything that is added as a hindu scripture after vedic age should not be considered a hindu scripture. Pratisargaparvan was written around 14th century, so there is no question of considering it as a hindu scripture. Which means there is no point considering Bhavishya purana as a sanatani scripture, but more like a history book. 6. And also there are many experts who still question the authenticity of this book. So I hope I make you understand the situation.
@EzpdRegmi
@EzpdRegmi 2 жыл бұрын
Har har mahadev Proud to be hindu
@TheTranceCartel
@TheTranceCartel 2 жыл бұрын
@surgical analysis And now we're not
@s.k9837
@s.k9837 2 жыл бұрын
@surgical analysis people of the world's oldest religion are converted 🥴 Ok
@ShahRukhKhanOG
@ShahRukhKhanOG 2 жыл бұрын
@@s.k9837 prove it's oldest 1
@nahidakhtary
@nahidakhtary 2 жыл бұрын
@surgical analysis Read about Bramha samaj .
@ProGamingKingdom
@ProGamingKingdom 2 жыл бұрын
@@ShahRukhKhanOG bro literally science has accepted vedas are 5000years old
@mrdon691
@mrdon691 3 жыл бұрын
Vedic Corruption in 5 ways:- NUMBER 1:999 lost Sukta’s of Rigveda Shaunak Rishi in his Brahddevata, Katyayana’s in his Sarvanukramani,Sayan Acharya and Skand Swami in their Introduction of commentary of Rig Veda Mandal 1 Sukta 99 state that Kashyap rishi is the seer of 1000 suktas, in these suktas the number of mantras(richas/Verses) increase by one. 1. Katyayana’s Sarvanukramani : Katyayana writes on sukt 99 जातवेदस एका । जातवेदस्यम् एतदादीन्येकभूयांसिसूक्तसहस्त्रमेतत्तु कश्यपार्षम् । Rishi Kashyap is the seer of 1000 Jatvedas suktas. 2. Shaunak Rishi’s Brahddevata : . Kashyap rishi is the seer of 1000 sukt addressed to Jatvedas which appear before the sukt addressed to Indra (Rigved Mandal 1 sukt 100). The first sukt of these is “For Jatvedas…(जातवेदसे सुनवाम ……..Rigved Mandal 1 Sukt 99). According to Shakupanithe number of mantras increase by one(in the number of stanzas). (Brahddevata 3 -130 -B) 3.Shadgurushishya’s Vedarth Dipika : According to Shadgurushishya’s writings these Richa’s( verses )were 5,00,499 in number. ऋचस्तु पंचलक्षा स्युः सैकोनशतपंचकम् In light of the above stated facts we can draw the following conclusions 1. Kashyap rishi is the seer of Rigved Mandal 1 sukt 99, Jatvedas sukt. 2. Kashyap rishi is the seer of a total of 1000 Jatvedas sukt, including Rigved Mandal 1 sukt 99,. 3. Rigved Mandal 1 sukt 99 is the first sukt of these 1000 sukt. 4. These 1000 Suktas, of which Kashyap rishi is seer, appear before Rigved Mandal 1 sukt 100. 5. In these sukt the number of mantras increase by one, from which we conclude these 1000 suktas contain a total of 500,500 richa (verses). 6. In the extant Rigveda Samhitas we get only one of these 1000 verses, this leads us to the conclusion that 999 sukt are lost from the Rigveda. Alternatively it can be said that 5,00,499 richa (verses )are lost. The evidences presented above convincingly prove that in the extant Rigveda Samhitas a large number of suktas are missing. NUMBER 2:Vedas were stolen Let me start by sharing with you an interesting yet ludicrous story that is mentioned in the Shanti Parv of Mahabharata; the story of the Vedas being stolen from the Creator of the Worlds by two demons, Madhu and Kaitabha. We read about this in Shanti Parv, Section 348. The two mighty Danavas (demons), having seized the Vedas, quickly dived into the ocean of waters which they saw and proceeded to its bottom. Seeing the Vedas forcibly taken away from him, Brahma Ji became filled with grief, and started wailing. The Vedas were later recovered by Vishu Ji’s timely intervention but still it shows the insecurity of the Vedic texts from the very beginning. If Brahma Ji had memorized the Vedas, how could the Vedas have been stolen? Perhaps his memory was not that strong after all. I only shared this story to give the readers an idea of a book which according to Hindus is the ‘greatest wonder of human civilization’. Truly a wonder it is. NUMBER 3:Missing Verses Nirukta 7:8 talks of a verse offering an oblation to Vishnu and Agni but the verse is not present in Rigveda anywhere. Does this mean Vedas aren't well-preserved as thought and the contents changed over time? NUMBER 4:1131 Vedas? According to the Mahabhasya of Patanjali, there were 21 Shakhas of Rigveda, 9 of Atharvaveda, 101 of Yajurveda (86 of Krishna Yajurveda and 15 of Shukla Yajurveda, according to later authorities) and a 1000 shakhas of Samaveda. All these add to give the figure 1131. All these Shakhas are considered to be Vedas. The words Shakha means a ‘branch’ or a ‘limb’ and refers to a particular traditional text followed, as in the phrase śākhām adhite, (“he recites a particular version of the Veda”). However, out of these 1131 Shakhas, only 11 Shakhas remain alive. As far as Rigved is concerned, only one Shakha, Shaakal Shakha alone remains alive out of the 21 that existed at one time. Another shakha that may have survived is the Bāṣhkala, although this is uncertain. Out of the 101 Shakhas of Yajurveda, only 6 are alive. In fact, Yajurveda is classified broadly into Shukla Yajurveda (White) and Krishna Yajurveda (Black). The former is popular in North India while the later is popular in South India. Shukla Yajurveda is also known as Vajasaneyi. The Vajasaneyi Samhita has forty chapters or adhyayas and there are two extant Shakhas of Shukla Yajurveda viz. Kanvaand Madhyandina. Krishna Yajurveda has 4 extant Shakhas viz. Taittirīya Maitrayani Kaṭhak Kapiṣṭhala There are three surviving Shakhas out of 1000 of the text of the Samaveda Samhita: the Kauthuma Shakha is current in Gujarat, Uttar Pradesh, Orissa and since a few decades in Darbhanga, Bihar, the Jaiminiya in the Carnatic, Tamilnadu and Kerala, and the Rāṇāyanīya in the Maharastra. Out of the nine Shakhas of Atharvaveda, only two have survived Paippalāda, in regions south to Narmada river Shaunakīya, in regions north to Narmada river What we know today as Rigveda, Yajurveda, Samaveda and Atharvaveda are actually Shakhas from the multitude of other Shakhas. The so called Vedas are never named as Vedas in their hymns. In other words, Rigveda is never called Rigveda in the Rigveda itself. If it be said that in other scriptures they have been called as Vedas, we can respond that so many other things have been called as Vedas also. For example, Ayurveda (Medicine), Sarpaveda (snakes), Dhanurved (weapons), Itihasaveda (History), Puranaveda (Stories). These words are based on Shatapath Brahman 13:4:3. Hence, 1121 versions of Vedas have been lost. If someone will say that the Shakhas are not Vedas but only the explanations/commentaries that would be erroneous. The presently known Vedas are also Shakhas. So are these commentaries or actual Vedas? To say that Shakhas are not the Vedas will be to undermine the present Vedas (read Shakhas) also. Considering the two opposing Shakhas of Yajurveda we may ask, “Is Madhyandina Shakha (Shukla Yajurveda) the original or Taittirīya Shakha (Krishna Yajurveda)?”. The above analysis makes it clear that a large portion of the Vedas has been lost. NUMBER 5:Some more missing Verses. After the collection and codification of Vedas, many different manuscripts gained currency amongst the Brahmin groups. The number of mantras in every manuscript continued to be changed. The current version of Rigveda was collected by Shaakal Rishi and was thus called Shaakal Samhita. It is divided into 10 Mandals (Books). Nirukt 7:8 mentions the following, “There is a joint oblation offered to Agni and Vishnu in the ten books of the Rigveda.” However, in the entire Rigveda, there is not a single mantra jointly praising Agni and Vishnu. What is meant by joint oblation here? An oblation is an offering (Late Latin oblatio, from offerre, oblatum, to offer), a term, particularly in ecclesiastical usage, for a solemn offering or presentation to God. Where is an offering jointly made to Agni and Vishnu, we would like to see? This is a clear evidence that the Rigveda at the time of Yaska Muni had the joint oblation offered to Agni and Vishnu, but it is not found in today’s Rigveda, demonstrating corruption of the text.
@mrdon691
@mrdon691 2 жыл бұрын
@Skand Srivastava Quoting Hadiths with no Knowledge of Hadith Science. Watch this before quoting Hadith. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rceVhL2HrL7LgXk.html Regarding Vedas,okay forget all those so called proofs. It's going to be a 10 Hour discussion so leave that one. Let's make it easy. History is Vedas goes like:- It was given to 4 Master Rishis(No Historical Evidence of such Rishis) Then they went on to spread the knowledge of Vedas through Oral Transmission from the Guru-Shishya Method (this is only found in Stories) Before compilation, the writing was done in leaves and all, the full Vedas were still in memories.(no evidence of such stories) Then after the invention of paper, Ved Vyaas wrote down all of those and today we don't know where is his written Vedas so there is actually no proof of preservation. Now just ignore my above comment of corruption, now there is no proof of preservation and neither any proof of corruption. No one should trust these books.
@OneviewStudios
@OneviewStudios 2 жыл бұрын
If you don't know about vedas don't make spam...
@Dharma20941
@Dharma20941 2 жыл бұрын
I have heard of what you spoke an it is entirely true that most knowledge of Vedas are lost but even the 1perct we still have that has knowledge and subjects which aren't touched by Islam or Quran or by many religions so far. Central concept of Hinduism is consiousness which isn't touched by Quran nor does liberation (mukti) is touched by Quran. The concept of reality beiñg illusion isn't touched by Quran and these are central concepts that means many verses in vedas, Upanishads etc are devoted to these. I can do nothing but pride that even 1perct of Vedas that is left have subjects nor explored by other religions. Yet all subjects you can think of in other religions has been explored In Vedas and puranas. Such are mighty Vedas imagine the immensity of knowledge if Vedas were alive as it was before.
@shrutimehta293
@shrutimehta293 2 жыл бұрын
I believe that you read Vedas but how will u prove that whatever u understood that's only correct.
@jovinkamuhabwa9984
@jovinkamuhabwa9984 3 жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 3:15"...Allah did not think they were fit to preserve them.." REVELATION 14: 6-7 6 Then I saw another angel flying in the midst of heaven, having the everlasting gospel to preach to those who dwell on the earth--to every nation, tribe, tongue, and people-- 7 saying with a loud voice, "Fear God and give glory to Him, for the hour of His judgment has come; and worship Him who made heaven and earth, the sea and springs of water."
@ahmedabdulmalik4792
@ahmedabdulmalik4792 3 жыл бұрын
A few seconds ago he just said maybe he isn't sure and what he is going to say is speculation
@jovinkamuhabwa9984
@jovinkamuhabwa9984 3 жыл бұрын
@@ahmedabdulmalik4792 The Gosple preached by Jesus Christ was for eternity not for people of his time and place, The devil tries to deceive you.
@jey2275
@jey2275 3 жыл бұрын
The Quran itself says that God preserve his words , if he said that it is corrupted means he is contradicting his scripture 😂😂 he is famous for his blunders and money laundering . " Medical doctor jakir naik" still don't know basic biology . He copied many of these nonsense from the master Abdul logic Ahmed deetat 🤦🏼‍♂️🤦‍♀️
IS THIS REAL FOOD OR NOT?🤔 PIKACHU AND SONIC CONFUSE THE CAT! 😺🍫
00:41
Cute Barbie Gadget 🥰 #gadgets
01:00
FLIP FLOP Hacks
Рет қаралды 50 МЛН
Китайка и Пчелка 10 серия😂😆
00:19
KITAYKA
Рет қаралды 2,1 МЛН
Concept of God in Hinduism - Dr Zakir Naik
7:53
Dr Zakir Naik
Рет қаралды 158 М.
Messengers (Prophets) in Hinduism & Islam - Dr Zakir Naik
8:38
Dr Zakir Naik
Рет қаралды 23 М.
Rabbi Discovers Prophet Muhammad in Bible
3:33
Muslim Central
Рет қаралды 223 М.
Famous Historian EXPOSES ISR*EL’S FACTS! | Isr*el’s Future In The Quran!
30:55
IS THIS REAL FOOD OR NOT?🤔 PIKACHU AND SONIC CONFUSE THE CAT! 😺🍫
00:41