Exactly right 💯 🖌

Or that he sucked after the Fabs.

@@jerryeberts except he didn't cause ram is a masterpiece. also temporary secretary exists

​@@diorsseRam is absolutely a masterpiece my man.

Great philosophy.

527 likes no comments? Let me fix that

@@stefanhe9809 nooooo! It was going perfect, you ruined everything.

@@alejsmt XD

Ahahaha

The fake Paul is supposedly “William Shears Campbell” hence “Billy Shears” in the Sgt. Peppers album.

Tavistock and MI-5 covered it up. ‘The Last Will and Testament of George Harrison’ on two mini cassettes, recorded in the hospital after a guy broke into his house and stabbed him several times.

​​@@rayburnyarborough4695 I've watched that "documentary", and anyone who got fooled or believed it was George's voice clearly aren't a fan of them or are plain gullible. One part of the documentary even talks about the supposed "clues" already appearing on rubber soul which was released before his supposed date of death? Clearly the narrater or scriptwriter didn't do a proper research first.

@@zdvxgf I grew up with the Beatles, saw them live on Ed Sullivan, and even played their music. There seems to be many people here in the know. I won’t argue the point. I wasn’t talking about a documentary. It’s two mini cassettes that inadvertently showed up at a radio station. Sure, many videos might have been embellished somewhat. I can’t even post the website on YT where it showed up. So how did you hear them? All I can say is that something drastically changed with the Beatles. Think about it, they introduced drugs and transcendental meditation to this country, even saying that they were more popular than Jesus Christ. Two things really stick out to me; when Faul grew a beard to hide the plastic surgery ( he did look different) and the early b&w films showing Paul playing the bass. He never looked down at what he was playing, he had total command of his instrument. Then, at some point in time “he” was constantly looking down. The whole story makes way too much sense to me. I didn’t know until a while back that the guy broke into George’s house. I had to look that up. They obviously went after him too. I’m not so sure that Tavistock didn’t invent the Beatles as a social experiment. For Maxwell to show up at the “supposed” scene of the accident makes it seem logical. Anyway, it’s ancient history, kept alive by die hard fans. I moved on to the Allman Brothers Band, who also was torn apart by tragedy. One thing for sure, the music will live on! Take care! Update: I listened to these tapes again and confirms my thinking that they make way too much sense to not be true!

He was not a lefty. Paul never looked down at what he was playing and then he did constantly. There are photos of Faul playing the guitar right handed. Paul and John had already written lots of songs and when they started running out is when things really started falling apart.

@@rayburnyarborough4695 one question, do you play bass? If not then your rationale is invalid and solely basing it alone into how many times Paul looks into his playing is just plain stupid. I am a musician, I play bass, guitar, and has good understanding of music theory. Have you watched his performance for "Silly love songs" during his wings tour? The baseline is more technically challenging and considering that he is also using a "rickenbacker" bass which is a larger scale bass, that's actually a more challenging piece to play while singing and not looking but Paul did a great job with it, see it for yourself. Maybe you're comparing of Paul playing different songs and obviously that's a lazy way to do it. In addition, one of the reasons Paul didn't bother too much looking at his bass playing in the early years was because his basslines back then were pretty basic,repetitive patterns, root and a fifths..etc and the fact his been touring hundred times. But beyond 1966, his playing became more complex and improves, but same feel and technique employed. If he was indeed replaced then majority of the musicians will agree Paul after 1966 is superior than previous Paul. I can't even start how Paul's approach to melodic structure and playing tendencies has always been the same, same voice timbre with identical frequencies..etc I still have lots to prove but I feel like I'm just wasting my time as most of the context will be esoteric.

Yes i dont get how people can say hes dead with all the evidence that hes not

Yes I agree 💯 Paul McCartney is not dead, I looked it up on Google to see his grave and it says he's not dead

there’s so much evidence that he is tho. Sir Paul Mccartney is not the same since 66.. either you like it or not, his whole personality, height and face changed in a way that it makes it obvious… unless you didn’t research enough you’ll think otherwise

The get back documentary is made up, its not reallity. It wasn’t filmed January 1969, it was done by Peter Jackson for Disney resently.

@@MsCaleb79 uhh no, it was even shown back in 1970 i believe It was recently re-edited by peter jackson But of course youll still believe that its not real because it would disprove the stupid theory

They do believe he created all that stuff, but they think his real name is Billy or something like that.

@@Paul-gn6bt In order to do that, he would need to prove that everyone who spread the theory damaged his reputation and cut him off from opportunities in a meaningful way. Since there wasn't really a time where this happened, I don't think he would have a case.

The only people who believe this crap, are nutcases who's opinion is not worth anything anyway.

@@thelastchannelonyoutube in all honesty. I think most people just like the silliness in it. Of course some people believe but most are just having a laugh.

@@norbitcleaverhook5040 im scared for micheal kennedy and carmine They seem real set on him being dead

Most songs after 66 were backlogs from James Paul. Penny lane written by James Paul as well as marcher Martha my dear. You don’t seem to know much. Billy shears was around as a double back in the early days. The music went south after 66 when they ran out of James Paul songs.

@@carminecupani2315 bruh 💀💀

@@carminecupani2315bro thinks paul only wrote 2 songs after 1966 💀

@@richjc7004 Paul may not be dead but billy sure isn’t James Paul. Just look at the wings crap music. This tells you all you need to know.

Billy pepper and the pepper pots. Hence sgt pepper given to the album by the way that James Paul had a lot to do with. Took Billy by Surprise. The words of John on how do you sleep at night.

You left out the ultimatum "or die" part of that conversation.

@@turdferguson2982 Oh yes, most probably !!!

@@luishumbertovega3900 I'm glad that you agree.

Lot of POWER behind ole William@@turdferguson2982

@@turdferguson2982 Oh when you add that it ALL makes sense. JFYI, I'm being sarcastic, as I can tell you have a problem understanding sarcasm.

Nah bro sign on for a life contract lol

He’s 85. Not 80.

​@@carminecupani2315 he's generalizing not being literal

@@carminecupani2315 Don’t be so sure of such an easily fact-checkable claim… he’s 80 on the nose, they were right

@@Heeyynnooww Paul would be 80. But Billy Is 85

🤡🤡🤡

Ironic to see that paragraph begin with "no,no,no." Only to see something just as stupid

@@Coryiodine Thanks for pulling me out of my delusion. I don't know what I was thinking. You will make a great dad someday.

Paul Simon was considered but he was too short.

@@aldeayeah Not only that; for some reason he objected to having his hands and forearms cut off in order to replace them surgically with those removed from 'original' Paul's corpse. (Note they still have the exact same tapered shape and black arm hair as Paul's always had, all his life.) Amazing Simon wouldn't agree to this, when you think about it...[Sarcasm]

Paul was living with the Ashers during the early Beatle years. The mother was a musician and music teacher, and he learned things from her. Paul also was the only Beatle who really connected with George Martin, who had been Mrs. Asher's student. Martin taught Paul a lot. In addition, Paul was already pretty great in the early years, and even his teenage songs are often very sophisticated, if not rock and roll songs. Plus, Paul spent years writing songs with John Lennon, and their collaborations were closer than many of us realize, I think, even in the later years. Jackson's GET BACK shows their comradery, even as the general cracks were widening in the group. So, lots of factors can account for the growing sophistication and brilliance of McCartney's songwriting, in the late Beatles period and beyond.

that's what i've been saying. paul is very fond of the wacky baccy, someone snuck a video of him chuffing on a joint as recently as 2019 i believe

That also mean he could write whatever he wanted and no one would know if it's true or not (i know it's silly I just wanted to comment it)

He's talking about penny lane I think

Point ✨

Also on Carpool Karaoke, Paul states he got a haircut in one of the barber shops there. The shopkeeper was still around and had a photo of them which looked like it was before '66. How would William Campbell know the real Paul got a haircut there lmao

@@paulwaswalrus5956 If the shopowner was "still around," snd had a photo of them, you don't think Faul, Billy Campbell, wouldn't know about it? PLEASE! We're talking about more money than one can imagine. He would've paid to find out EVERYTHING HE COUKD POSSIBLY KNOW ABOUT JPM. BOTTOM-LINE is this: Anyone looking at undoctored pics of round-faced, shorter Paul pics from, say, '62-'65 versus FAUL pics from '67 o ward KNOWS THEY ARE 2 DIFFERENT PEOPLE! You know who else knows? Facial recognition software- Faul get only about a 70% match when placed against Paul pics 😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆🎶😆

He sort-of already has, there was a video about the "Paul is dead" conspiracy that he made some time ago.

@@ytcorporate9237 my mistake then, hell I’ve probably seen it to

@@2dan4me97 no worries, it's quite old so I don't blame you for missing it haha

@@ytcorporate9237 I've been watching him since 2017 or so, I've probably seen it too I think that makes this worse actually

the rotten apple or the Winged Beatle I think are a couple of those.

you heard it HERE 1st......

Oh No Yet another Steven is dead rumor@@donaldcarpenter5328

Same

john lennon went from being a grandson to a grandfather in '66 to '67

and also the john is alive theory that he never died and is instead hiding in albania asking bystanders for 50 dollars to make Get Back 2

Let us know. Your laugh- is it a “hee hee” or a “haw haw”? I must know. It’s really important to all of us.

@@michaelkennedy6415 Really? I don’t think it is. But I can do it just for you if you’re too shy to just say?

It makes me laugh that you don't yet you think you have a clue 😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆

@@michaelmakinney20 It makes me laugh just how grammatically incorrect you are.

oops.

Welcome to the world I discovered at age 12.

Don’t say that bro, I’m supposed to shake his hand and have a cup of tea with him atleast ONCE before he goes :(

He is dead since 2008

@@howardmann8689 Well, I do believe that Paul died in 1966. His real Mom died in 2008 though. William Campbell’s (the fake Paul) Mom died in 1995. Both of the Pauls father died in Gstaad (Bern), Switzerland- unknown date (probably in 1970’s)

Oh no. Dad almost did kill Paul. 😬🤣🤣🤣

In part because "Cranberry Sauce" sounds like something else on vinyl.

Whats insane is that Paul didn't even know there was an Elanor Rigby buried in his hometown.

@@norbitcleaverhook5040 Do you magically remember the names on every headstone everytime you go to a cemetery?

@@samuelbarlow4376 No. But if I didn't remember her, how did I write a song about her?

@@norbitcleaverhook5040 Because he the name, forgot about it, then later subconsciously remembered the name without realising where it came from

EXACTLY. Literally my favorite Paul phase is from 1963-1965

Nah , John is better

@@sathira_anuk5179 fr

Weird isn't it? "You must always remain the same and write exactly the same way. If you don't, you have been replaced".

silly people that don’t believe in change

His 70s work was pretty close to being as popular as Elton John's 70s work which is a pretty impressive follow up to dominating the 60s with the Beatles.

"Uhhhh actually that song was on backlog and James Paul actually wrote it uhhhhhhh" -A fool who believes Paul's dead

@@shocko77 conspiracy theorists are not known to be the brightest group of people.

Original Paul wrote at least 50 songs before he died

Yeah. The annoying part.

Yeah but penny lane, Martha my dear, blackbird and numerous others were 90% paul Oh sorry I mean Billy

@@shocko77 Yeah but Martha sucks, that's definitely a Billy song.

@@norbitcleaverhook5040 martha my dear is a fantastic song

​@@norbitcleaverhook5040You read too many conspiracy nut videos. Your opinion don't matter.

John says ‘cranberry sauce’ actually

Repeat with me, children: Cranberry sauce. Cranberry sauce. Cranberry sauce.

oh well you can achieve that by being a part of the illuminatus brotherhood, i know it sounds like a mystery but there are ways you can actually get in contact with them

@@bartholetbay412 hi, isn't the brotherhood a myth?

@@ddirtdid Well it is not and you can't actually expect it to be open to everyone, but if you want to know more you can look up ANTHONY MARK SZYMON online you will find something interesting.

@@bartholetbay412 oh really, i just saw his website, interesting.i will leave him a message.

Beatlemania was just beginning to die down. This could have been a publicity stunt.

its so eerie that the beatles cant age because theyre famous so he was replaced with a lookalike in the 60s

Pretty easy actually...

Nothing says fake Paul did write anything. Maybe he's credited so label got more of the publishing money. They changed their looks drastically and all we had was grainy photos and TV back then it would be easy to pass off the "random white dude" look. There are plenty of artists who could assimilate in another band quite well everyone has their ways and styles. Look at Scott Weiland adapting into GNR and making hits for example. I don't think this happened but I wouldn't put it past this industry and 60s and a band this big was worth the chance.

Ticket to ride isn't Paul's 🤔

Right!? Like, I'm pretty sure at least John would have a *fit* at the mere suggestion of replacing Paul *after he died*..I don't think in this situation Brian could keep a grieving John, George, and Ringo from disbanding on the spot, much less have them replace their best friend since teen-hood!

@@the13thdoctorstardis94 this is especially true after watching get back. No way would john be messing around and joking with a fake who replaced his best friend, and george and ringo wouldn’t be so friendly with him either

@solidsalt3412 completely agree. It's been said that the four "close ranks" when it's them and other people around, and I don't believe they'd open that gap to a complete stranger. If someone was missing, I'd wager they'd close tighter to make sure no one could have an opportunity to replace any of them.

​​@@the13thdoctorstardis94 I think the theory is that they were threatened or something, which is why they kept dropping what the conspiracy theorists described as subtle hints, like barefoot Abbey Road, Sgt Pepper funeral-like album cover and "the Walrus was Paul".

​@@george4821you got to remember these boomers come from a time where their parents thought if you played their little rock vinyls backwards they could hear satanic preaching etc. that satanic symbols are in all mass media and is some sort of jewish conspiracy. they probably thought it was so silly back then but a lot of them are like that these days.

What's your point?

Que son puras tonteras ....,!! ese fué solo un rumor que difundió la gran maquinaria de Marketing que tenían The Beatles,no olvidemos que ellos revolucionaron una era completa y este rumor aún los hace más grandes...!!! Lo otro ,George en la antología cuenta que ha sabido que la droga LSD...que quien la ingiere...nunca más vuelve s ser el mismo...y como sabrán ellos experimentaron con dicha droga...es más grabaron varios temas bajo los efectos de ella....e incluso en. Sargento Pimienta....quien dice que no fue eso es lo que quisieron decir....?? ...y que Paul quedó allá ,es decir en el mundo alucinante que produce ...el L S D...???? es mi humilde opinión....,!! 👩‍⚖️🧔🧒🤵....🌸🏵️🌈☀️🌌

Stop shouting!

Their chins and earlobes are completely different. Not to mention that the new Paul was somehow 5 inches taller. Also interesting how the Beatles mysteriously stopped touring around this time. There’s a book written about it called “Billy Shears” but it is passed off as a fiction novel.

@@Metanoia000 I understand that the "Paul is dead" conspiracy raises intriguing points. However, it's important to examine these claims critically. The differences in facial features and physical traits can often be attributed to angles, lighting, and the natural aging process. Height differences can also be exaggerated over time, and it's worth noting that our perception of height can vary. As for the cessation of tours, The Beatles' decision to stop touring was multifaceted and well-documented. Their intense schedule, increasing artistic focus, and growing fatigue with the touring lifestyle all played a significant role. It's essential to consider the broader context when attributing events to conspiracy theories. The book "Billy Shears" appears to fall into the realm of fiction, where creative storytelling often weaves elements of reality with imaginative narratives. While conspiracy theories can be captivating, it's also crucial to weigh them against credible historical records and verified sources.

@@Metanoia000 "mysteriously" their manager literally died. Thats when the band started to fell apart. He was the glue to The Beatles

There was a suggestion his eye colour was changed after the car crash. I'm colourblind so I can't see it myself.

@@Metanoia000 I just have to ask, how is he now taller? In every magazine he was ever in where height was talked about he was 1.8 m, and has always been so.

But Billy was Ringo.

@@DougSalad you mean Richard

@@yogiblair22 Dick Starkey, yeah

What?

There's a lot of scientists commenting here but if you dig deep into this you'll see there's plenty of evidence that the swap actually happened . If you see accurate photo analysis of the 1965 Paul and the 1966 Paul ( Faul ) faces, they are absolutely not the same human being . Even forensic vocal analysis backs this up . Some interesting DNA issues and illegitimate children and settlement payments made are also worth mentioning . George Harrison also referred to Paul as Faul in interviews . Never say never until you have proof .

I know right. William should be offended.

And also the get back documentary Because theres plenty of points where they dont know theyre being recorded and hes always called paul and always part of the band But the conspiracists will just say it was all fabricated or something idk

Unless said "new guy' had powerful support from the PYRAMID. Which he still does.

​@@user-fu2mi1nd5lSomeone should call your carer you clearly aren't taking your pills

I don’t care if “William Campbell” had 6 eyes Paul McCartney is alive and well…

It's amazing what people believe! 1st: The "eye thing" (if there's one) was never noticed because this subject was never an issue before. 2nd: He possibly sounded different due to his smoking habit at the time. No! Paul has not been dead, and to tell you the truth I wish he'll never die. But, he eventually will!

"Uhmmm you must believe us whether or not if our evidence are makes sense or not. You must BELIEVE EM OR URE A SHEEP!!!!" - 🤓🤓🤓Conspiracists

thing is, he really doesnt and forensic voice analysis agrees. Billy knows music theory and can read music and had voice and instrument training. He waa a session musician and a talented one, at that. Both Pauls are good, but one of these men is not like the other.

@@annother258 He still can't write music theory though.

@@annother258 Right on, sister 👍🏻 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/adOApsiWm7XZqn0.html

What if Paul "died" and ghostwrote for "Fake" Paul because he didn't like all the attention and needed to step back for a bit. and when the Beatles broke up "Real" Paul came back into the spotlight.

what if there was a ghostwriter for all of the beatles all allong?

Maybe the Tavistock institute was the ghostwriter Hold the door as I also see myself out

Paul didn't even know there was an Elanor Rigby buried in his own hometown. Maybe there was always a ghost writter?

Underrated comment

Underrated comment.

The evidence of Paul being replaced is quite compelling. It makes sense to examine that evidence before reaching a conclusion.

Yes

@@paulchamberlain8355 I know Jose corrected his comment error.

Oh man, that's a new one🤣🤣

@The 13th Doctor's Tardis for sane people "Paul's not dead" is hilarious. It's like a 2 hour documentary about the conspiracy theory. Lots of playing vinyl backwards and zooming in on album covers. 😆

@xjunkxyrdxdog89 I'm not going to lie, a story like this (but obviously not with the Beatles) would be some genuinely enticing fodder for a drama/comedy, like that one short film made out this but longer. Maybe even a TV show, lol.

Nah I think Paul was better than Billy, but that’s just my opinion

Billy put on a great show, I saw him 24/10/22 in Newcastle NSW, Australia. Best fake in history! 😉

Then if so, I guess this "Billy Shears" Guy is way better of a songwriter and musician

Oh yeah, John wrote and sang the better bit, but Paul composed most of it as well as writing the middle eight, so it's generally considered a 50/50 effort.

actually 27, do your math

Yep. It's all explained in detail in the documentary "O-bla-di-o-bla-li-lu-le-lo" , or as it's more commonly referred to "Metal Gear Paulid".

You won't regret it. It's charming. He revisited many of the places mentioned, along with other special places from his younger days, in the Carpool Karaoke session with J.Corden.

Same! and Hey Jude... A day in the life... Blackbird... Fvck I want to listen some McCartney voice

Well, be deluded, if you like, but we haven't seen the real, original JPM in years, mate 🎷

@@michaelmakinney20 J.P. Morgan?

@@anthonycantu8879 😆

Hi, buddy! I think you missed the first line of the short so I’ll write it here for you: “I like the ‘Paul is Dead’ theory. Not because it’s real, obviously, but because of what it implies.”

@@michaelmakinney20c’mon now Same Same Same cat and he is a freaking BILLIONAIRE! Dooh

Yeah, artists from major labels never use ghostwriters at all. I'm not going to argue for or against the PID theory but this is extremely poor logic.

@@joelglanton6531 Thinking Paul died is extremely poor logic

@@nunyafunyuns That doesn't render your argument logical lol

@@joelglanton6531 my argument is based on logic while yours is based on myth

@@nunyafunyuns I explicitly stated that I'm not arguing in favor of the "Paul is dead" theory. I thought I made that really clear. I'm simply pointing out that your argument assumes that a musical artist must necessarily write their own songs, which is easily proven false.

Paul left behind at least 50 songs, some finished, some not

He's rolling over in his grave 😮

He’s been behind it the whole time. Think about it.