Hahahahahaha

Hahahahahaha

Nice

Priceless. Hahahaha. Oh you are gooooood!!!

My whole house is laughing!! Lolol

We better get some cards that can run Crysis installed in Hubble and JWST.

What if dark matter is fog of war.

@BigLBA1 From your POINT of view ;-)

@BigLBA1 so if the expansion isn't limited to light speed, could it mean spacecraft could transit these areas faster than light speed? Does this only apply to areas between galaxies or solar systems that the light speed limit would not apply?

ehh sort of

😁🤣🤣

@@sophiafake-virus2456 don't fall off.

Actually nothing travels faster than the Speed of Love, and its a vector, comes and/or goes

It is true that “nothing@ travels faster than the speed of light, however “something” does

@@sophiafake-virus2456 touch some grass dude

You monster

@@Exotic4M3 I have black toast intolerance.

Me too. I like toast that is all black on the outside. I toast two slices together in the same compartment so one side is toasted black the other still fluffy

Kinda like those other two guys whose joke you stole

i'm sure he was referring to the time it takes to also apply butter to the toast and sit down to eat it.

If something in the universe has been seen or measured - especially if it has been seen or measured by multiple teams using different methodologies, and so the probability of it being a fact is high - then it's not just a guess, it can be treated as a fact. Prof Lincoln tends to do videos about aspects of the universe that have been thoroughly tested out - and everything he talks about in this video has been thoroughly tested. So yes - you can talk about those things as facts. If you've got the training and the equipment, you can test them out yourself, you don't have to take his word for it. That's what's so good about science, good scientists are very clear about the data and methodologies they used and the probability of their claims being true. And any lab in any country can repeat the tests and check the claim for themselves - it's not a matter of opinion or belief. He's also explicit about things we don't know, and things we think are true but have not been tested exhaustively yet. But this video is about well verified facts.

@@nycbearff I hear you and for the most part I agree... that's why I like this channel, but to say everything in this video has been thoroughly tested out and proven as fact is not a great scientific statement. For example, at the beginning of the video the age of the universe is mentioned and Prof Lincoln states "if you take that number as a given" then references another video. A better statement is "we assume the age of the universe from what we currently know." And that's what I'm pushing on... our knowledge is far more limited than we like to think... our universe could be way older... we are simply relying on our current methods of measurement and we all know how much things change as technology changes. So to recap: my push was on how absolute some of the things were presented that are only "absolute based on our current set of measuring tools and knowledge base"... that moves things from fact back to theory, where science operates best. My guess is, if pushed, Pro Lincoln would agree, but that tends to make a more cluttered video.

He is giving me the Arma 3 NPC vibes of body confidence.

Greetings friend, what is it you wish?

quest accepted... I will deliver his letter to the bartender in Cerulean City.

😂

This made me cry its legit

But we know the smallest it could possibly if its curved. Since space measures flat the smallest it could possibly be is 540 billion light years across or we would be able to detect the curvature.

then do they say nothing is faster than light? it sounds like misinformation. i want the truth.

@@briandzwoniarek8952 Yeah, the universe can't expand faster than light, so size can't be more than 13.7 × 2 without someone being full of sheet 💩 There was no big bang.

@@briandzwoniarek8952 nothing can go faster than light, but as in cherenkov radiation light can be slowed down and the charged particles are moving faster than light moves through the water. In quantum entanglement pairs stay entangled at great distances, but nothing can be done with it. So no information is moving faster than light. The galaxy is expanding faster than light, but only from our reference frame. If you stared at the farthest galaxy we can see it would take 120,000 years for it to recede out of sight because it's 120,000 light years across.

@@markburch6253 thanks, im trying to get ahold of this concept. its tough

Ha ha ha ha ha. Egocentricity wins again! The Catholic Church will love that part of the video. Obviously, but not stated, is that everywhere in the universe is the same. If our Sun was in Andomeda or HD1 (farthest detected galaxy) the exact same principles apply. Everywhere it the centre of the universe, as far as we know.

this is EXACTLY what i came here for. it always seems like its a given that we are the exact center of the universe. i thought i was going crazy

Context matters. Here in the context of observable universe, earth is the center because of that's the property of light. In medieval astronomy, claims like earth is the center of the solar system or Milky Way have been debunked. Don't mix the two.

He said radius of 46bya thus double it for diameter across.

​@ChickensFTW Well, nothing can travel faster than the speed of light in space is the law. But space itself can travel faster than the speed of light. And since the Universe as a net is expanding that means that space itself, not as an object in space, it is able to surpass the speed of light. Basically stuff can't travel faster than the speed of light through space, but space itself can surpass the speed of light. And therefore the Universes distances and lifespans don't, at first, match up.

So are you suggesting space is faster than light?

@@thatsawesome2060 Yes. Space itself is expanding faster than the light inside it.

Because time slows down as you reach the speed of light.

@juggliar A growing universe never made sense to me. If the universe grows the first questions as cliche as that sounds is: into what? Than the answer would be nothing. What is this nothing then? In what way does it seperate itself from empty space. Something that grows has a definite size. It is not infinite. Yet science has no idea what lies beyond the observable. "Because many predictions about the Big Bang have been proven with observational data, we tend to accept it as fact, even though it's still only a popular theory. ... As the story goes, Einstein thought Hubble's theory was flawed. His belief was that the universe was static, rather than steady state."

Nothing's better than a slice of fresh coal in the morning

Cool

@@colby9529 Coal*

@@channelname10yearsago68 Toasted cool.

@David Johansson coal*

I guess the point in space that those galaxies we can see now occupy would have been well within the 42 million ly radius. But there weren't any galaxies at the point in time the CMB was emitted. The oldest galaxies we can see would have formed several hundred million years after the time the CMB originated from.

Thanks for your answer. Let me ask it in another way: the univers expands in different rates during different periods. Huge expansion at the begging, low expansion till 7/8 b years and accelerate expansion till now. The CMB radiation during its trip from 42 Mly to us today, has found all these expansion rates, that made it last 13,7 b years. During the first period, did the radiation got away from us due to the high expansion and in the other late periods make up lost ground?

No, the closer galaxies (eg 1b ly away) moved out of 42 million ly sphere 1b years ago.

yes it is

@68walter: because comcast doubled its rate every day for 4.5 billion years.

😂😂

Spoiler alert!

it just means there were many infinite numbers before the ones currently in range, steadily going out of our range at a rate of 20K per second.

@Shadys Back tell a friend actually......actually what???

@Jordann ego

It’s ALL just theories. Quantum mechanics undermines all their claims.

@@mediterraneandiet2483 That’s YOUR theory 😊

@@mediterraneandiet2483 How exactly?

He’s actually not good at making things clear.

Who actually thought the question is dumb? Think about it...

I am one of those people too lol

In a video presenation like this, apparently it becomes common to omit important details on the reasons behind and assumptions. I have more questions than answers after watching this. How can he casually state that the universe is expanding faster than light without mentioning that this goes against Einstein's relativity. But interesting anyway.

@@g1ld he clearly stated dark energy is a factor and there is more dark matter and energy than regular matter in the universe, thats why space is moving away faster and faster, space is made up of about 93% dark matter and dark energy

Even if you dont believe in God, some sins simply can't be forgiven.

That’s only what SOME take away from it ...

Maybe he didn't do it - burn his toast - maybe "Dark Energy " did it !

@@termikesmike I bet that toast tastes like some dark energy. They could probably take it to the lab and solve that whole dark energy problem within about 8 minutes as well.

He just wants to be sure his toaster is working.

Good question. There’s no way to possibly answer it. Any answer would be unscientific.

depends on how many toasts you are making... duuh

That's why the toast was burnt. He can do physics but not toast.

The coffee took 8 min. The toast started in Venus time

My toaster is VERY slow!

Photonicinduction's toaster can make toast in 10 seconds.

That’s because he toasted it for eight minutes.

😄😄😄

This is the deeper wisdom in the Universe, That toast was burnt...

Damn it. You beat me to it

@@jmathieson15 Hmm maybe another wisdom: The early worm gets eaten by the early bird ?

I understand that burned food is carcinogenic.

Except that's not what he said...go back and listen carefully.

@@joehas6440 ha, don't meltdown over burnt toast, try to take a joke without being triggered

TheJoemul69 Bread two minutes , pop tarts two minutes, waffles maybe four minutes

Maybe the bread had been frozen to near 0 kelvin

Is that a front or backyard stick?

I see you gave up once you reached Jupiter

Before you finished measuring it had expanded maybe twice that ,,,,,, well your answer will always be wrong at any given time

It’s actually a billion trillion

You God!

But this means universe is expanding faster than the speed of light

Lol

Well, the alternative would suck even more!

It's nothing personal. The Universe doesn't run away from you... instead everything in the Universe runs away from everything else in the Universe. More or less.

In short, everything hates everything

😀

All four *known fundamental forces.

Since Q is Picard's pal perhaps this question will be answered?

Hahaha damn that was clever!

fire, air, earth, and Mountain Dew

@@xMaverickFPS Where does vodka fit in? Hmmm... Dark energy... black outs... Hmmm... Oh, answered my own question.

Camping&Gaming same 😂

Guess whati am doing

You’re not on your own 😂

Watch "crash course astronomy" please. Thank me later

Haha. Oh shit so am I

Congratulations, you've become a ZOMBIE

😂😂😂😂 so much said in that joke .... I dug the philosophical sarcasm in response to this video ... I can bet it went over alot of peoples heads

"this is your brain on science"

@@lostpockets2227 ....nice 👍 😂

Is that “egg” with an “e” or some other letter?

Jon R how do you know what power setting was inapropriate for the toast?

It wasn't burned... the light from the toast just hasn't reached us yet.

@@inox1ck i mean you can actually see the toast is burnt in the video. It's fo0ckin disgusting lmao

The distance Sun-Earth is 1 AU or 8 light minutes. If you toast a slice of toast for 8 minutes it usually transforms into a charcoal-like state.

That's what happens when you leave it in for 8 minutes

lol

Hahahah

Sam Wilt that’s not how KZfaq comments work

there are some really good videos about this on PBS's Space Time channel, too!

Peter smart guy talk physics:)

:)

+1

*facepalm* In my circle of mates, you would've been punched twice in the arm for that shocker.

Would have been better if he asked for a light.

A proton, electron, and neutron walk into a bar. The guy at the door says, “five dollars.” The proton and electron each give the guy their money and begin to walk in. When the neutron attempts to do the same thing, the guy holds his hand up and says, “For you, there’s no charge.”

Banibal Yonadam It’s amazing he can still see.

6 volt 54 watt toaster or he toasts it with ordinary sunlight.

That would explain his burnt toast.

B. Y. The comments on this video are really giving me a great laugh. Yours included. Thanks. Very observant - that's what makes a good comedian.

Anne McKeon thank you. Appreciate the comment 😊

LIght a spliff to help with comprehension.

Eat some toast

Wow the god botherers are out in force. Go read a bible to the sheep. We prefer reality and facts.

Tom Quirici sorry you couldn’t keep up.

@Tom Quirici science isn't perfect but it's what we've got. If you want to learn about the limitations of these physical models you will have to understand them first.

Watch it a few times and try to write down the gist. The concepts aren't easily grasped because they aren't very natural to our (human) thought process. Need to put some effort if we really want to understand. If not, just say science is bs and God rules. Because that's easier to understand

It wasn't that hard

Bhupinder Saroya we have a very short attention span

That is the point. They don’t want you to understand. If you do, you will notice that is not true

@@stefaniaslovat Exactly. Just have faith. Smh, calling themselves 'non-believers'

Good because it was all religious nonsense. Not one shred of evidence in reality.

That’s impossible to know. Pure pseudoscience speculation.

@@deangulberry1876 no its not dr gupta give a great explaination it can be 26 billion years old

@@abdullahazeem12 there’s no way to prove it. I’m sure Gupta is a great man. But you quite simple cannot observe billions of years, let alone observe a billion years in an experiment.

@@deangulberry1876 this is how they did it in the first place observed billions of years in experiments gupta has given some solid logic which again should be taken into account cause his explanation makes more sense cause according to the 13 billion years old theory the universe started to kinda become its present shape right after 300 million years how did it go on such evolution so fast that is a big question that the 13 billion years figure generally is not good at explaining

@Jerome O'Mara Um.. nope.. Solar systems do NOT have black holes within them ...

I think in these 8 minutes were a few minutes of waiting for the toast to cool off a little. Add to that the time it took to put on jam, cheese, whatever he eats for breakfast and you'll reach these 8 minutes.

I’m sure he meant to say galaxy

@@abelis644 True. But who's to say the universe itself didn't originate from a black hole that couldn't contain it's own energy anymore. Then boom!.. the big bang. Even in the bible when they describe the void in genesis before there was light, it sounds awfully similar to a black hole. Essentially it's a void in space but where did these voids source from? that is the real question that even the greatest physicists and scientists cannot answer.

@@marksang-pur9984 Black holes are understood, Here is a quick quote: "As stars reach the ends of their lives, most will inflate, lose mass, and then cool to form white dwarfs. But the largest of these fiery bodies, those at least 10 to 20 times as massive as our own sun, are destined to become either super-dense neutron stars or so-called stellar-mass black holes. The Universe is immense (lol, obviously), I don't know that its mass was previously in a black hole... what was there before the big bang...

Epic comment

Except hed be drawing all over his green screen. Kind of like how other engineers at my company keep writing off the end of the whiteboard and onto the wall by mistake.

@@mysock351C r/wooosh

I'm not quite bamboozled yet.

@@mr.boomguy he knows that it is a joke lmao

it is the space expanding not the galaxies travelling faster than light. Basic of relativity

@@IvanC64 Okay, but then it seems to follow that "total space" (or spacetime in general?) is radically different from intergalactic space as such . because otherwise no galactic groups would be able to hold together over time. If we accept the idea that space - between galaxies - is expanding faster than the speed of light seen from great distances within space, then it follows that space around/within our Local Group of galaxies, or even around the Virgo Cluster, is ALSO expanding faster than the speed of light in multiple directions, seen from some vantage points far away in the universe. Obviously such an expansion would seem to pull our Local Group apart in just a couple of million years! 😃

It is called Big Rip. In any case the faster than light expansion happened during inflation. Now the apparent speed is lower than that speed otherwise you would simply not see anything at those distances

@@IvanC64 Most astrophysicists I've heard of would say that the Hubble Constant applies throughout time, so therefore at enough distance, galaxies would seem to move faster than the speed of light - in the present, too! (which would lead to the consequences I sketched above)

... WHY? Hahahaha

@@danielmartinmonge4054 title sound like an a religious anti science type question.

@@Erik-lq4eo no men, Bible needs science so that we can understand God..

@@valvennis what

@@Erik-lq4eo God needs to be compete so that we will know whats inside of Him..

He says with an M so you don’t think he said billion you idiot

ArkadyVasiliev yes I think we all get it.

🤣 you are funny 😂

@@ArkadyVasiliev To presume someone is an idiot when they clearly understood the difference is.. Idiotic

Everyone knows that after a million comes a milliard, and then billion, after which billiard, trillion, trilliard,.... Take that, English speakers!

Well, technically, "the visible universe" and "the universe" are two very different things; so the answer is no. :P

@@jim1816 No to " the universe" is correct. Yes to " the visible universe" . I think there may have been just a slight misunderstanding in the wording from ZombieBait.

ZombieBait you’re exactly right! Remember you’re the main character in your own book too!

Technically, there is no center of the universe.

well, the universe COULD be infinitely large, meaning that any and all points within it are 'the center'.

C'mon man! Corn pop in the pie hole!😝

Well played sir....well played

Fuck yeah

"Ahh. I see. So simple. I understand perfectly"

Lol

Best comment.

Beat me to it lol

Yeah, I was thinking after 8 minutes toast is usually inedible.

Apparently,The toaster is hotter than the sun.

best comment

with a b

Dr. Don Lincoln was born in 1964 Billions.

😑🙄🤔😭😭😭

The fact is, we are all really 13.7 billion years old.

No, he was 52 years old when the light from him was emitted which was 8 billion burnt toast minutes away.

Deep

🤯

that's actually a really good analogy lmao

The universe exists in human years, but moves in female years.

Dog years! OMG I forgot all about Jackson's Concept of Time Perception In Relativity To Dog Breeds. Curse you terraavis, now I have to recalculate all my universal theories! This is going to take years, I mean centuries since I am a large german shepherd.

It was toasted for 3 minutes, but because of the expansion of the universe it was actually toasted 90 minutes.

That was for a reason, because sun light takes 8mins to reach the Earth,so the toast was put in for 8 mins :)

@@ion9084 I feel like that was a subtle joke. If your bread is in the toaster for 8 mins, it’s gonna come out looking like that lol.

Yeah It seems to me he didn't really answer the original question! He just put it in a different context, but the original point isn't addressed.

The music hasn't had time to reach you yet. But when it finally does, you will be hearing it not as it is now, but as it was then.

@@Brian-lz9wh Funny man. Sense of humor.

@@Brian-lz9wh *Oops* It just arrived! And with the right name kzfaq.info/get/bejne/l9qefZRymtGph6s.html

Most try to attract attention to and make a mediocre video better with noisy music. Some even try to say something but you cant understand anything because of the foreground music. Professionals like Don dont need to do that.

@@Ullimately One person, who posts educational videos to KZfaq, explained to me that the vast majority of people are so uneducated and stupid that the only way to hold their attention is to try to entertain, at the same time that they teach. And so, they add music to the narration.

You played NieR, nothing should confuse you anymore

Basically the universe expands faster than the speed of light so we see less and less stars as time goes on theoretically. Imagine the universe as an Hoberman sphere (search it on google), that's how space expansion looks like.

@@AndryRock9217 I searched it on Google .... It said ( and I quote ) ..... "Something that AndryRock9217 made up" ...... What gives ?

@@stevenattanasso2003 Well this is how I understood it. If you think I'm wrong then please explain.

@@AndryRock9217 what you said is accurate. Except the expansion rate wasn't and isn't always faster than light. The expansion rate is listed as distance expanded per time per parsec. So big voids of space expand faster (the distances between far objects) faster than close objects. Partially why in the future we will only see our closest neighbours.

Define 'toast'

Hahaha can do the math on the blackboard but can't make toast

He shouldn't have to. Let the scientists focus on science, give them whatever they need

@@madeuppington8702 underrated comment

@@madeuppington8702 Brilliant. 💖C💗 🖤🥼🔬✏🥽🌌🚀🛰🛸

That would make sense if your mass isn’t increasing :)

You, like I, are at peace with the cosmos.

The more scientific explanation is beer.

😂

Donuts is the reason for that waistline bud

I don't think anyone is naming stars outside of our galaxy (or at least our local group) so I'd say she is wrong.

I knew I shouldn't have done those bong hits before watching this video.

sogerc1 If the star died and is no longer there we still see the light coming because of the distance and eventually the light will all get to us and it will no longer be seen! She is correct!

Edward X. Winston It may not even exist anymore

Ed, the same thing happens with our children...mostly, as some do stick around longer than others.

It’s actually the equation he uses to calculate how long to toast his bread

@@pts5217 and still he fucked it up. Zero credibility.

@@sfbloodsister Finally found someone with a brain in the comment section.

Hahaha

Ha ha ha

They say even they are expanding with space and exceeds the speed of light, to the observer, the relative speed is still less than the speed of light. They call it the relative speed with the observer.

Best comment

The universe is not and object so why could it not expand faster than light Its not fysical

Light need space to move, so space do what it should do making more space.

@@landergaming don't try and play smart when you can't spell physical correctly

@@feelsbaronman8044 lazyness is the key to invent things take a look at a dishwasher why it got invented

The channel "kurzgesagt in a nutshell" have great videos about this subject and others. The one called "limits of humanity", if i remembered correctly, talks about some topics discussed here.

No, our visible stars are closer than that and formed much later. The universe is much older as well imo.

Not really, the stars that we can see with our naked eye are no more than 10,000 light years away which is an utterly insignificant amount of time in the universe. But yeah, for us humans who barely live for an average of 75 years, we do glimpse into the distant past. It's crazy to think about.

Huh ?

Especially when you're trying to explain something you don't really understand yourself.

Let me run a idea that I came up with. Through out time on this earth, we’ve had giants that roamed the earth. As we evolved we apparently got smaller, yet smarter. We learned a lot about ourselves. Our bodies are actually energy, our brains operate on electrical impulses which sends information to all parts of the body, we get our energy from the food we eat, the sun, and as we lay down we can recharge our batteries to live and operate for another day. Let’s take a look at the simplest theory of the box in box. Suppose what you see is actually the inside of the father/gods brain matter. We are just living within, thus we may also have mini universes living and thriving within us. As for the speed of light as it relates to the universe that could very well be the thoughts of the creator. Think about this, when you want to move any part of your body, how long does it take for your brain to send those electric impulses to your muscles to move them? So the box theory could relate to we are the body living within another body. If indeed what you see in space is actually the inside of the creators brain, we also have a universe living within our brains as well, thus touching on another theory of the multi-verse.

@@heartofthunder1440 What are you smoking? Nirvana Kush? Actually God dwells in a metaphysically separate realm. His brain is not a physical thing. He created all matter and energy from nothing. He even created what we know as time. His word is all that is necessary for creation.

@@Gpacharlie I’m looking at things from a infinity standpoint. We could be just that small. You do know that solar system do resemble a atom in some aspects. Infinity ♾ small infinity big, box in a box, and multi-verse can go hand in hand.

Nostalgic G4mer so true

Having met him in person, hes not the nicest guy in the world :/

@@Sporkyz74 I'm sure Mr. Rogers was a total asshole too

The way he suggests to subscribe is sublime and excellent. He actually made that part palatable (usually the 'subscribe' part is off putting to me). " I think so Mr. Fermilab. I think so." A great presentation. Easy to watch and understand. Well done!

Mr. Rogers and this guy have totally different careers. Wouldn't it make more sense to compare him to someone like Bill Nye?

i see what you did there

that was cool

It took me longer than it should've to understand what you did.

Skillzz

Was about to like this comment but it has 69 likes

Of all the information given that's what you are getting from? Hahaha

@Planet Purgatory Sounds like an open and shut case. Consider me a convert, but I'm ashamed as an American to say that I don't have a deep fryer at the ready for my morning routine.

8,2 min

That long will burn your bread to coal

You're trying to be funny,? Of course you know that's not how coal is made... By burning I mean.