99% of Canada is completely unpopulated. All the major cities such as my home town, Toronto, are close enough to be destroyed by heat and radiation coming from across the border. I can see Buffalo NY across Lake Ontario, from my house on a clear day. Sad enough, Canada will not survive a nuclear exchange.

Without even counting the collateral damage from nukes, Canada's economy would collapse since 3/4 of it's trade is done with the U.S. alone.

Unless we (the USA) have nukes and highly militarized bases there, I have a feeling that most of Canada would survive just fine. Quebec isn't an 'enemy' that could reach out and punish the USSR (oops, sorry, 'Russia') afterward, so aside from heat blasts... if the wind is favorable, Canada (in my mind) would probably do OK - until the nuclear winter set in as I imagine that, while a global thing, the farther north one is, the worse a NW would be (not sure about that, though). Let's just hope we continue on our current track of attempting to make Canada's and Russia's growing seasons longer with our successful implementation of Global Warming.

miles m LOL!

miles m LOL!

anthonydominguz You live in arizona?

9am here but that's hilarious xD

It's not even 15 minutes, shut up

That's right,. Crookie.

Real life Terminator nñnń

I live in the Lower East Side of Manhattan (it’s the hook of Manhattan) so no matter what I’m dead. Even if I made it to my closest subway, or basement it would be nearly a direct bit. I don’t even think I would want to survive anyway. The suffering that would precede such a tragedy seems like a worst fate then instant death.

my country is part of nato so we also join the kamikaze ride! All smile for the big flash!

The fallout would be brutal !

😀

Same bro.. I live in Philly..☢

Exactly, even a single bomb on Europe would be an economic catastrophe.

Cannibalism is always on the table

Lol because those poor countries have much larger populations now than what was possible when they were hunter gatherers. Now they are dependent on the first world to sustain them with food imports. Leave race out of it, it just makes you look stupid.

@@cannabico6621 because large percentages of the populations of poor nations live off of western food aid. The rest require large stocks of fertilizers, pesticides and fuels to provide for modern population sizes. Which they also import from the west. Stop being a goofball and use your head.

@@Steve-eq8iz um not a bit issue, poorer countries have too many people

Canada: "is it 4th of July? Why all the fireworks "

@@redhunter8731 then realise it's like august or something lol

Candians be like... Nuclear winter -- or as we'd like to call it 'Canadian climate all over the world'

"What's going on eh?"

E "Eh bombs"

I love that movie

@@AzaiReacts see, winning move

A strange game......

Nope. It’s being belligerent. The US should go after China while Russia should go after Europe. The true clash between superpowers can only happen after all other conflicts have been resolved.

How about a nice game of chess?

Yeah you are priority lol

but its fast over

Thankfully it's Seattle

"Jim Creek Naval Radio Station is a United States Navy very low frequency (VLF) radio transmitter facility at Jim Creek near Oso, Washington. The primary mission of this site is to communicate orders one-way to submarines of the Pacific fleet. Radio waves in the very low frequency band can penetrate seawater and be received by submerged submarines which cannot be reached by radio communications at other frequencies. Established in 1953, the transmitter radiates on 24.8 kHz with a power of 1.2 megawatts and a callsign of NLK, and is one of the most powerful radio transmitters in the world. Located near Arlington, Washington, in the foothills of the Cascades, north of Seattle, the site has 5,000 largely forested acres (2,000 ha)."

Not for Germany though...

Alex Schmidt Germany was never nuked but if they had lasted abit longer(1945) they would have been nukes.

Prof2You Smithe what Russians have did all along

_How about a nice game of chess?_

Quote credit by hollywood

While the USA and Russia burns, Australia is still there getting fucked by kangaroos. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

*Chinese kangaroos

@mlg360 ProShooter.. Wtf you people are sick who think Aussies do that... have you ever been to Australia mate? We have luxury lifestyles compared to the rest of the world. I feel like im a king here!! so fuck you jealous Yank

I remember that flash animation :)

Amesang nah Australia's just sitting there like "hey, keep it down up there!"

They might have prevented world war III. On the other hand they might kill us all soon...

@@afanasymarinov2236 yeah but in normal WW III maybe like 5 milion soldiers would die and in a nuclear was like 200 million-1 billion would die

mdhookey Yes

mdhookey Estimated casualties: A couple soldiers on each side and a few deer. As many a 20 homes might be slightly damaged causing a number of families to live with friends or relatives for a week or two.

Heheh...and a few offshore bank accounts will be disturbed ;)

"So much for our cunning plan, corporal. Now get me a Big Mac." :P

Vatican city vs Monaco vs San Marino vs Transnistia.

iron man lol same man

I live in Michigan and you couldn’t have said it better Ironman

Quit voting Democrat...

I live near Detroit. That's some true shit.

@@itchytriggerfinger7622 yet everyone wants to live in democrat controlled new york and california 🤔🤔

cmdfarsight how about a global thermonuclear war?

cmdfarsight "I prefer banging"

I was skimming through the comments for any _WarGames_ quotes. Thanks for that.

Glad to be of service xD

Greetings, Professor Falken. Hello, Joshua. A strange game. The only winning move is not to play. How about a nice game of chess?

JKEMI : funny movie reference

Great film.

Would you like to play a nice game of tic tac toe?

Washable Junk Checkers, no Chess.

from what movie is that?

So it’s a lose

ARVIN You won the dedication award

The way how things are going it may not be to long.

+Red Droid sad but true

Miggiest Of Tow do not expect that if a war starts these two would start throwing nukes at each other like no men s business, the two super powers are aware of the consequences that will accrue afterwards, they are using the nuclear bombs just a form of intimidation towards others, if they planned on using them do you really think that they would let anyone know how many bombs they possess?

No because "these two wont" the US in its own will be stupid enough to for no reason

Miggiest Of Tow pussy

it's slowly preparing us, just in case 🤣😅

It knows.

the king creeper I'll put my money on emus any day

The Australian army deploys its forces in Western Australia into the outback, but the Emus home ground advantage allows them to repel the soldiers trickling in. Soldiers would not move in mass groups due to logistical issues, and after the initial failure, would pull out and wait for bombings. Emus would take heavy casualties from initial runs, and immediately move south, as they did during the First Emu War. Emus would overrun small town like Coolgardie, and the Australians would not risk collateral damage. The Aussie tanks are deployed for liberation maneuvers, but Emus have shown to be able to outrun tanks, and lead them into rough terrain. The Emus would most likely split, one group distracts and makes the tanks break down or retreat, while the other moves further south towards the West Coast. Australian satellite imagery would track them, but only until it is too late. By then, Emus would have assaulted Mandurah. Many soldiers would retreat to Perth and set up defences, while the tanks pull back towards Perth. The second Emu force would follow them back, and the two sides would flank Perth. I expect extremely heavy casualties on both sides, especially the Emus, but after days of fighting, the defenders would run low on supplies. Any supply route would have been cut off, and convoys ambushed. Perth surrenders, and Australia would thus secede Western Australia to the Emus as Emuland., Perth and the larger coastal cities stay in Australian hands, as free ports in Emuland.

history has your back on that one

delet this

nein

China will die and surrender first. Bcoz, USA already destroy them. So, Russian turn ti fight it

@@journalism7615 Bullshit

They have the advantage of already being accustomed to dust storms and ecological collapse.

@지우 using nuclear bombs is like playing with explosives in your back yard, your house might survive but it won't be in any condition that enables you to continue living in it.

@지우 How long can that state of things go until it comes down to the very powers themselves? It's the case that even a dozen warheads would drastically worsen global warming and ensure a nuclear winter for everyone killing 100's of millions.

Thankfully, you were wrong

@@normansmith9009 not yet he isnt

@@mrfrostygiant4725 he said “in a few weeks”, that was over 5 months ago, so tehnically he is wrong ;)

@@normansmith9009 it's still raging on, still a chance to happen.

@@mrfrostygiant4725 Yeah, I got that...but he was still wrong ;)

Not the penguins in zoos.

Dylan Schultz cockroach

Excuse me?

They were already filled with them.

The penguins don't need a nuclear war to improve their situation, they'd probably be more harmed then helped. I guess there's a chance that such a nuclear winter might help the polar bear though...

Sun tze said show weak when you are strong, show whatever you want when you have 8000 nuclear warheads.

To take an enemy whole is preferred.. Um why make those? Our gods can't even comprehend such power.. SunTzu finishes with future people are insane.

@@zyilund i prefer the roman saying, in times of peace prepare for war!

unless you are from the future or are aliens.

Sun Tzu said those things, and I think he knows a little more about fighting than you do, pal, because he invented it! And then he perfected it so that no living man could best him in the ring of honor!

No, we aren't... If you live in africa. Waka wake E-E-E. It's time for africa.

Africa is even more fucked, fallout, political instability, famine and loss of support from NATO and the UN mean artificial borders would collapse and wars would tear apart the continent. And lets not even get started on economic collapse with the loss of the USA to global markets Australia and New Zealand are the only real winners, being small relatively self sufficient, deep in the southern hemisphere and lacking serious internal conflicts, they could possibly survive as post-war nations.

Barney Collington I'm from Africa and NATO offers nothing for us. If NATO would collapse, war will not break out in Africa. We are self sustaining states with our own militaries protecting our borders.

Out of curiosity where in Africa are you? It's an enormous and diverse continent and it's situation varies wildly depending upon regions. The problem (Aside from economic collapse and nuclear fallout) is that any small division or conflict will be amplified a thousandfold in the event of a war like this. Imagine the Mexican cartels, the Somali pirates etc. The African countries are new and Artificially created by European powers, many of them suffer from internal divisions, Imagine if Britain and France were the same country for example, or Greece and Turkey.

Barney Collington I'm from South Africa. yes, it is massively diverse and the economic fallout with be big. But without NATO military, will make little difference to us. My counties military is activity fighting piracy under the UN charter in Somalia and the rest of Africa as needed. NATO had already cause a lot of destabilized both African states. Mainly Libya, Somalia, Sudan, etc. My point was a focused on the NATO military going away. Nothing to do with the economic issues that will come from such a war, nevermind the actual devastation of a nuclear fallout that would effect the entire planet

if by that you mean the fun kids will have 40 years after a war drooling on it, then yes, bcus everyone will be dead

war was fun? I guess for some people.

Agreed lol

@@Tethloach1 yes it was. Very fun. If it wasn't for nukes the whole world would be different

@@Tethloach1 it was pretty fun in the middle ages

God help us if this happens brother

Ha ha.

Easy. Arctic has Polarbears. Vs Penguins? They cant even fly.

Sgt. Toast The ocean will win.

But the penguins have aircraft carriers

don't underestimate antarctica's submarines

Penguins orcas white bears. ..... Amazing bro!

Nah you'll probably have the best chances to survive. Southern Hemisphere near the equator will be least affected by nuclear winter. It's probably gonna be ~10°C colder on average. Just hide somewhere remote and plant some crops.

@@NeoAemaeth already live in somewhere remote. Off grid solar, got some crops around here. -10C would be great. Too hot in here.

Hahahha

they wouldnt be laughing when a nuclear winter starts

magicstix0r Imagin, aliens would make a dokumentary about it. “The Human Thermo-Nuclear-War“ “Everybody dies.“

he literally said that the Human races would not all die. Why would it?

the only places left would be africa and australia so yes all the humans would die and what would be left is them

no he does not say everyone would die you idiot. I am so fucking sick of these low comprehension readers. In this video he estimates the US and Russia loosing most of there population and near by areas being heavily effected. However how severe the world is effected is depending on nuclear winter and how bad THAT would be. No one knows how bad a nuclear winter would be.

Not exactly.. Russia sucks at war and use outdated military tactics also their Airforce is pathetic.. they used the same copied Nazi propaganda to make Russia look all powerful. So the question is.. do they really have the Nukes they claim ? Or even work ..

boy teebah Alex Jones stomps

boy teebah sumo wrestling? :D

THAT'S BULLSHIT! GET OFF THE PHONE!

Alex wins because of Super Male Vitality

Alex breaths his "breath of 50,000 cigars a day" breath,kills Chunk Yogurt easily

80-100 million tops! Depending on the breaks!

What if the attack happen on New Year Eve or on July 4th? A lot more casualties for the winning of Russia.

You would still lose you dumbass.

Best comment

It seems like sarcastic joke to me, isnt it? Why are they fighting in here?

Why?

Because it's either people who have no fucking idea what they're talking about, shit jokes or edgy political posturing.

I'm losing brain cells in comments

Is this only a “2017” Version Binkov's Battlegrounds?

Fallout be like :

Do you narrate amazing War Machine?

Canada: ahh shit here we go again!

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ldd-ict-rc7Xpp8.html - The reasons for the creation of hypersonic - kzfaq.info/get/bejne/iLGPqdF32Lenj4U.html - kzfaq.info/get/bejne/h5p8mM2A2b_Nqas.html

who would win? ta-183 vs mig-15, binkov

Йопта, прикольно блядь!)))

a nuclear winter. I like it.

Really is a solution to a problem, isn't it?

pretty good if u ask me

you ass hats are the reason we all have to die.

How to fix a high fever: 1.- go outside in a blizzard

it actually wouldnt. it would actually make it significantly worse and destroy the ozone layer indefintly Vsauce3 did a good video on it

Lachlan Hamilton you smoke crack with that knowledge

Lachlan Hamilton You're thinking of Sulphate Aerosols

Seeing how 47 liberals took that seriously though is kind of a scary thought..

Patrick M Then the SUN WILL BECOME A DEADLY LAZER AGAIN

I think their was a vote on it but it lost.

Where do you vote?

Nah, Iran would probably win.They have more than twice the population of Saudi Arabia, more manpower (including the basji militia), more experienced generals, more fanatical/disciplined troops, and a relatively modern military arsenal.

Abdullelah Faiz Saudi Arabia would win because they have a far more advanced air force and they will destroy any iranian ship in the persian golf because it will be to close Saudi Arabia is airforce can reach the entire persian gulf so Iran is navy and ground force will be completely useless

Iran would get to Saudi Arabia through Iraq, during which ground forces would become very much relevant. The Saudi airforce isn't invincible either, they will suffer casualties.

Depends on what ICBM is used to target the airbase. If it's a MIRV then lower yield, 100-500 kt. If it only carries a single warhead, then a megaton in yield.

In general russians using bigger heads so they dont really have to worry about targeting

Indeed, eradicating humanity would long-term diminish global warming

That is actually a serious proposal: drop nukes in uninhabited areas for geoengineering. Of course, it probably wouldn't work. It would be much more practical to force volcanoes to erupt, or put large objects in space to block some of the Sun's light.

@@leiffitzsimmonsfrey1272 but then agriculture would collapse for several years and people would die of starvation Not to mention the effects of dust would be temporary since greenhouse gas level would remain the same But then at least it would be a good way to get rid of all nuclear weapons

@@user-up3dd1vw6b You'd have to be very careful with how much dust you kicked up to avoid crop problems. And it would definitely be a stopgap solution anyway, to give you a few extra years for other solutions to take effect.

@@user-up3dd1vw6b "But we also have overpopulation problem... simply nuke areas with biggest non-immigration population growth! Two birds with one stone." - An ignorant sociopath.

@➳OP°᭄ GAMER࿐ and Britain did nothing to help Poland

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/fp1npsqLvK6spac.html

@➳OP°᭄ GAMER࿐ Napoleon's successors: Are you sure about that

@@prasanth2601 France is a superpower during Napoleon's leadership, but it just a joke right now 😂

@@Fylnnn a joke with hundets of Atomic missiles

Was not surprised after first video.

I admit at first when I saw this channel's videos in my recommended list, the nice graphics and high view count made me think it was one of those clickbait videos. But after watching I believe they are very well thought out and avoids a lot of common misconceptions.

Yet still misses tons of angles.

That's what she said.

You can't even imagine how stupid his videos are and filled with various kinds of misinformation, distortions, inaccuracies, omissions, and so on. For example, this whole video is a complete mess, it simply omitted all the strategic advantages of Russia, such as hypersonic missiles in service with Russia, the best missile defense systems in the world, the best electronic warfare systems. NATO has no defense against hypersonic missiles. Do you know what that means? That means Russia will be able to hit all NATO facilities with a guaranteed result. That is, destroy the ENTIRE FLEET (including aircraft carriers), destroy military bases, warehouses, decision-making centers (government and military buildings), missile defense systems, airfields. By destroying missile defense systems, Russia will gain air supremacy under the cover of its own missile defense systems and then, with the help of aviation, drones, loitering munition, cruise missiles, it will destroy enemy ground forces. And those, in turn, will not be able to do anything about it, since it is almost impossible to shoot down missiles and loitering munition with manual complexes.

War never changes....

brother could you spare me some bottle caps (charisma 5)

Same

Hey, when there's finally good times again (cause there always will be after this kind of stuff), we'll be living through a historical high as we party like it's the roaring 20's. So at least there's that to look forward to

Nelson Chereta Would be interesting..

Aren't politics just one big game of chess?

No. Chess actually has rules, and is considered to be civilized.

Nelson Chereta you know that the loosing side will probably push the red dutton ;)

VolgaGornaja (Putin) Checkmate Donald (Donald) you're fired! (Pushes button)

yeah let's crash in a tall building

Nah, they'd just go to Fairford.

All bomber crews will know all their family members died when and IF they could ever return to mainland.

no, they would start to use civil airports

@@YahyaAhmed-yt7fg it’s not possible to hit every single civil airport in the US

Liberty Prime that was said in COD MW3 by makrov

Liberty Prime ad victoriam brother

Fallout 4 The sole survivor

HOI4

Yassin Bisheer No fallout

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasily_Arkhipov_(vice_admiral) basically, he stopped a pair of moronic officers from firing a nuke at the US

@@jabloko992 it's only because they were told that USA sent a nuke at them, when it was a sun flare which was mistaken for a nuke, they are not moronic, they just believed that it was a real nuke, unlike the last officer

@@PYRO_90 They were wrong, weren't they? 'Start world war 3 and end the world as we know it' wrong. When that much is at stake, you need to consider all options.

@@jabloko992 it was wrong, but my country is like so, we will never attack first, but if we get attacked we will fight back. Technically it is not wrong, as we said multiple times that if anyone attacks us, we will attack back. So it is completely fair of the other 2 to agree on sending the missile. We are not going to stand around whilst getting bombed the crap out of are we? No, so I agree with the other 2 generals and what they did. I see what you mean though.

@@jabloko992 on their part, the only wrong thing was that they did need to re check that it was a nuclear bomb. That's what they could have done

even in the cold war the numbers where only a few million. In fact there is not enough nukes to wipe the world out like in games like Waste land or Fallout

I remember reading a report from 1985 that said that in a worse-case scenario, the US, UK and Russia would all lose 75% of their populations each, and nations like Canada and Japan wouldn't be far behind.

Yeah if you include deaths from secondary effects. Either way though both nations are no longer well nastions. And it will be years as in generations apon generations for the area to recover.

Chris Gaming both Russia and the US have significantly reduced their stock piles.

Andrew Coetzee Damn I want to play some more fallout and create the brotherhood of steel Indiana.

Jacko Gaming WOLOLO!!!

Eoin 11

Free Speech yea all american catholics will join in a civil war, thus weakening the US thus making China rule thus Vatican wins

Ibnziyad Tariq, don't think you know how many Catholics despise the current pope. Many think he's the false prophet.

Человек в квадрате the u.s not the us

Upon separation. Which is why DEWs would have a reasonable chance of destroying the ICMB prior to its apex in flight.

Ashley Saldanha I think he's Croatian

IrradiadedCrow so Russian

Earth Mars Croatian isn't Russian m8 they weren't even in the Warsaw Pact.

because his not american

00000000 00000000 If i gave you $1000 what would you do?

I once read a report that stated that in a scenario in which India and Pakistan used 100 Littleboy-sized nukes on one another, the changes to the planet's climate would create famines that, among other things, would kill a billion Chinese. In this scenario they'd probably have a similar problem.

"Rocket Propelled Mexican" 😂😂😂😂

Chris Gaming Life Noggin?

No, like, I actually read the report. It's avaiable online.

Chris Gaming LOL India has way bigger missiles. not Little boy sized

It's become self aware.

You mean Earth: Has joined the chat after a very long time when big chunks of overpopulation and pollution is gone

@@thorthegodofthunder9150 aliens: *it's free real estate*

We Muslim Malaysia with RUSSIA ..WE DONT WANT US ..WE WANT RUSSIA..PRESIDENT PUTIN VERY LOVE MUSLIM IN THE WOLD ..PRESIDENT PUTIN HAVE IMAN IN HER HEART ..PRESIDENT PUTIN WE MUSLIM FROM MALAYSIA VERY VERY LOVE U..DONT ATTACK ME AT MALAYSIA WE LOVE U

hahahahhaa

@Bradley Scott All I know is that Earth is overpopulated because of the resources being consumed and climate changing so rapidly. More population means the resources run out faster. Remember, raw materials are finite.

That would be four

Serously? 😑 Both these are just cartoons. This Channel only does scenorios when countries flight each other

ilmars LIETAUNIEKS It’s known as “humor”...

This man ask the real question

Mr. Rogers wins all.

We already got a pretty recent Iraq Vs Iran in the 80's. I do want to see North Korea vs South Korea though. India vs Pakistan could be interesting too!

india vs. NK. India vs. Russia. then itd be NATO Vs. Russia. again

designatted shitting silos

rainthegenericname_ LOL China would fuck India in seconds

B N they tried twice in two wars, in 2nd they got their ass handed to them.

Trainer Grim eh

Gabriel Ruesga That was something Puar said during Goku and Monaka's fight.

Well I guess it's time to move more northern from Vancouver

Nah it would be sorry a

Nah it would be sorry a