Aspects of Western Philosophy by Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly,Department of Humanities and Social Sciences,IIT Madras.For more details on NPTEL visit nptel.ac.in
Пікірлер: 29
@Singh007844 жыл бұрын
You are best Philosophy teacher I have ever seen. Thank you so much sir for such comprehensive yet easy and compact classes
@Homunculas6 жыл бұрын
Leibniz's concept of concomitant causation that you describe so well seems to have a strong parallel with the modern scientific theory of quantum entanglement.
@someshpawar62384 жыл бұрын
That's true...it formed the foundation of modern quantum mechanics!!
@ashxek6 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot sir. You explained whole series in very lucid way.
@kumarabhijeet71746 жыл бұрын
If PPT would be available then it would be of great help for revision. Thanks a lot for such a " clear and distinct " explanation.
@evelindasuchiang9641 Жыл бұрын
Love your explanation Sir 🙏
@premprakashshukla98017 жыл бұрын
Thank you Sir for enlightening lecture, Best Regards
@abhishekshah114 жыл бұрын
thank heavens for the internet
@pallabidutta96810 ай бұрын
41:51 Here Leibniz sounds like preaching Deism, by regarding God as the "single outside cause". The term "outside" emphasizes the transcendental aspect by overlooking the immanent aspect.
@Prabhjeet5 жыл бұрын
you are amazing sir....thankyou for this effort....
@razaahmed73966 жыл бұрын
great lecture and their explanation is more great we r greatful to u plz provide pdf if possible
@yashagrawal887 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@Homunculas6 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@SK-le1gm2 жыл бұрын
so this is the source of Yoda’s concept of “the Force” in Star Wars!!!
@modi4144 жыл бұрын
Thanks sir...plz teach Indian philosophy as well.
@SumitKumar-bt7hi3 жыл бұрын
Love you 😘😘😘
@chanchalsaraswat77624 жыл бұрын
I found the gradation of monads from lower to higher very much similar to Jainism concept that each particle possesses soul but they vary in their degree of consciousness. Can there be a comparison between the two?
@someshpawar62384 жыл бұрын
That's right. Like Jiva of Jainas, Monads are Qualitatively alike i.e. all are conscious and Quantitatively differ i.e. degree of consciousness varies. In that way, Monads are also similar to *SELF* of Ramanujacharya of vedantist school and *Purusa* of samkhya school.
@ERMRITUNJAY90S6 жыл бұрын
Awesome lecture..Sir can I get ppt of it
@artikashyapmusic65713 жыл бұрын
Thank u so much sir!!
@amitbaroi91624 жыл бұрын
Sir, I have some doubts. If matter is force, means they are same. How can force be attribute of matter? And how force is the union of soul and matter? Matter was united with body while defining force/monad. But while explaining the dualism they are explained separately.
@tanvimahajan53413 жыл бұрын
Thanks sir
@mimibiswas33795 жыл бұрын
Very informative and helpful lecture sir. Is it possible that the concept of monads from lowest to the highest is similar to the concept of Atma to Paramatma in Indian philosophy.
@genaurakumar64153 жыл бұрын
There is one mistake in timeline Sir. Born in 1646 and died at 1716. But a mistake that is -1772-76 he visited several places.
@naincy72773 жыл бұрын
Sir please provide the pdf file of the lectures
@amirshah99562 жыл бұрын
If Monads are the unity of matter and soul then why does Leibniz call it metaphysical? Matter is not metaphysical philosophically !
@ramlakhanmaurya82076 жыл бұрын
सर जी हिन्दी में भी संवाद कीजिये हम आपके बहुत आभारी रहेंगे।