You just now realized this happens? Lol.

As someone who isn't American, explain please how a law in one state can be totally different in another? I thought it was the UNITED states. Either make all laws the same throughout the country, or rename it the Divided States of America. Just a suggestion.

The Illinois State Police manages gun ownership for all of Illinois. This is the reason why I left not just Illinois, but Chicago as well. Tyrants gonna tyrant.

@@ArsonFire00 The 10th amendment of the constitution is why that is the case. Anything that is not covered by federal law, falls to the states to decide their actions. It's, actually, not a bad idea because of how different each state and the people within them are, whether it be economically, geographically, culturally, etc.

@@ArsonFire00 our country has always been meant to be a constitutional republic. States make their laws as long as they do not interfere with our nations constitution. The problem is they are Interfering with the constitution. Our federal government,ent was never meant to have the power it does. I for one cannot stand the federal government. We are too big and too varied in our cultures to be ruled by one government for all. What works for weirdos in California does not work for us here in the southeast. Many other examples can be made like that. It is called the United States for a reason.

If no o e did anything during the Covid nonsense then it’s not going to happen.

At that point they will import help from the UN. Sorry but Canada and the US are done. I hate it but it's true and they've been perfecting war in the sandbox for 20+ years.

So you’re going to joking the army? Good for you.

​@@Jam-Beat what?!

@@Jam-Beat a determined insurrection has been proven to be a deadly difficult pain in the ass to standing armies, even ours. I do not hope nor advocate for the day that comes to pass, but if it does... it won't be over in 30 seconds like many Leftists seem to believe. The only way that happens is if they carpet bomb an entire neighborhood to go after a couple individuals. I doubt the Army is going to want to kill scores of Americans to go after a handful of insurgents.

I'm still demanding the legal right to own my own nuclear weapons, just so the State _really_ knows to not piss off the People.

if the government can't use it, then we can talk about the rest of us not being allowed to have it.

I think there are 2 reasonable restrictions. First, is that the militia is beholden to the same treaties and conduct of warfare as our military, that being no bio or chemical weapons, and even no proliferation of new nuclear warheads. 2nd, I believe the milita should be restricted from indirect fire weapons, artillery - mortars, etc... (with the exception of guided munitions like the SWITCHBLADE drone) the militia should without restriction or qualification have access to any kind of direct fire weapon or line of sight weapon, from WWII style towed anti-tank guns to man portable air defense systems, M1 abrams (tanks), TOW missiles, Javelins, machineguns, Infantry Fighting Vehicles, etc... - the reason for this restriction is actually more practical than you might expect, and it's that any weapon which needs advanced mathematics and such specialized training to properly hit your target, with the capacity to miss by so much, obviously would require licensing which would have a training and certification process attached to it.

lol yea they would never do that to us they like us cause we were born kind of near them

@@DSiren yea im sure that could never be exploited in asymmetrical warfare against a less armed populace

27 states, and growing.

I know and that's amazing! 15 years ago I never thought it could have grown to the number it has! 🇺🇸

It should, however will not mean a thing if the lefts current campaign to remove conservative justices is successful.

In PA, the state congress passed it, but it was vetoed by the awful governor (Wolfe). Now there is a literal potato as governor, so the odds are even worse.

@@ForeverZer0 The Democrat corruption in that state is amazing to me. Like with Fetterman, sane people wouldn't elect that man. The fact that they essentially hid his condition away until after early voting was done is as corrupt as you can get.

In Wisconsin that is pronounced haVOC!!

​@@n1r0l I think there's a hyphen in there somewhere in the word

​@@n1r0l 😂

Nice to know my ass is covered.

@@n1r0l 🤣Have Ock!

And the word militia is not the same as the word military. The Militia means: a group of adult private citizens who privately train for military defensive action in case they need to be called upon to defend themselves, their fellow citizens, state or country in an emergency. The Military means: regular military forces, which are units of professional trained soldiers maintained both in war and peace by the federal government.

@@snortder in this context militia doesn’t even mean that. It’s literally just the pool of all possible people that could participate in a militia

​@Justin Other read the explanation in the heller decision. It actually goes into how the militia part isn't even neccesary to the right of the people. It's a perfunctory statement that involves one of many reasonings.

@@snortder Exactly. During the revolutionary war, militias from towns, counties and states were formed of the people coming together with their own weapons. They were fighting the military of England.

Succinctly, as the founding fathers themselves put it: the militia is every able-bodied person of fighting age capable of holding a weapon. So basically everyone in their teens and up with at least one arm is the definition of militia, and it's for their sake, NOT their restricted use that the civilians right to bear arms is protected from the government. And yes, well regulated, regulation in this context referring to how equiped you are. 2A literally says, a well armed civilian populace being essential to freedom, the civilian's right to bear weaponry shall not be restricted by the government.

And the MA AWB, as well as all the rest of our stupid gun laws, are against our state constitution as well.

so is the washington state assault weapons ban, the washington constitution is even more ironclad than the US constitution is on the issue... but it doesnt matter because seattle voters pass illegal laws

Same with the Washington state one. Yet the legislature and governor enacted an assault weapon ban last week.

It takes more than a piece of paper to protect your rights. "The price of liberty is eternal vigilance" and we've been slacking. A LOT.

@@jiminauburn5073 Ole George must be rolling in his grave knowing that the state which bears his name has descended into abject anarcho tyranny.

FREEDOM BONER GO VROOOOOOOOOOM!

Government is Artificial Intelligence.

​@@Marcara081 literally, if some people get their way. It's already being tested in both healthcare and judicial settings, legislative and eventually executive is hardly a step further.

A miracle yes... But we're not surprised they tried to pull this crap.

And sadly, it won't do anything to stop the senseless violence that occurs in Chicago every night.

For me, the real miracle happened, when 90% of the sheriff's in this state stepped forward and said we will not enforce these unconstitutional gun laws. Boy that really pissed pritzker off! And frankly, I love to see it because pritzker is trash.

@@crimony3054 no it won't, but the mayor and prosecutors doing their jobs would actually curb some of that gun violence. The cops can arrest as many people as they want but when you have prosecutors who won't do their job, it really does no good to arrest anyone. Unless of course, you are not a progressive. If you're not a progressive, you can get arrested easily and prosecuted

Most of the Illinois Governors are trash

Tru dat.

Yep. If you had told the founding fathers you wanted to enshrine a "military only" class of weapon, they would have lined you up in front of a canon. lol

@@poopnach that they'd have to rent from a neighbor

there was literal private armies and warships that were being contracted with by the americans at the time. they literally meant anything goes, when they said anything goes. they were allowing citizens to own private armies and warships, i am pretty sure you guys can own whatever fucking rifle you want. me? i live in canuckistan, so ive always been fucked by government.

​@@JamesMichaelDoyle but hey you got hockey though, eh?

Ive never heard someone call it the "accelerator" outside of video games lol

You need to leave the USA sometime, you’ll find out a lot of things you dont know 😂

That's what she said.

Though I think he was being a little melodramatic when he wrapped his car around that tree.

@@eldrl001 We call it the accelerator here in the US as well.

They're trying the California Plan. Write a law you know is unconstitutional. Enforce it until a court strikes it down. Pass another slightly changed but essentially the same law you know is unconstitutional. Enforce it until a court strikes it down. Rinse, repeat.

They are doing it just like Washington state did last week. They know that it will be overturned, but they hope that it will be in force during the time that it goes through the courts. And that will take years. Typically that has been the case, where they get to enforce it. But with the clear directions from SCOTUS, hopefully the courts are granting injunctions to prevent these clearly unconstitutional laws from going into effect while working their way through the courts.

Gov Fatboy wants the ability to do a hard lockdown like Australia next time.

Looks like the video is mirrored.

his wife let him have a little styrofoam wheel to turn

Australian confirmed.

Joe's been rubbing off on him.

It's the mirror effect caused by the selfie lense on a phone lol.

We need to call a convention of states and add an amendment that makes "denial or conspiracy to deny any of the Bill of Rights to United States citizens" punishable by death. Would also help get rid of tyrannical police officers as a bonus.

@@wingy200 I like this idea! Or just call it what it is: treason. Which carries the same punishment.

@@wingy200 Best comment on this subject. this needs to be in the main comment thread so it’s more prominent than it is here as a reply. Either copy and paste it into the main comments or grant me permission and I’ll gladly do so. With or without attribution as per your preference.

What former mayor Lightheaded did during Covid was despicable. She closed everything, and then went to get her hair cut. Democrat elites continue to pass laws that they themselves will not obey or get penalized for.

Because of a Supreme Court doctrine called "Chevron deference." It basically allows administrative agencies to make rules that have the force of law and the court defers to the expertise of the agency. It needs to be overturned.

@@RekietaLaw So the supreme court has the right to go against or able organisations to go against the constitution? Sounds sketchy.

They just passed an assault weapons ban in Washington state last week. Our state constitution says "“[t]he right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself, or the state, shall not be impaired..." So our wonderful state did an assault weapons ban, and in the law they passed, they said that assault weapons are not used or useful for self defense, and then banned them.

I was stuck behind an annoying truck...

Sticker is removed by the dealer during make ready. They no longer allow the sticker to remain on a sold vehicle.

I thought that was bird poop on the window. Nick, keep a tube of Armor All window wipes in the glove box for these kind of situations! They get the job done and they don't leave smears.

Crime would drop 100 fold

It is a good thing that Trudeau did not force anyone to get a vaccine, and supported people being able to make that decision for themselves. Or at least he just said that was his position during the pandemic.

@@jiminauburn5073 Apparently HE experienced it differently!

Nuke Minnesota

It can be, but it would require 2/3 of the states, which it isn't even close to having. So technically, it can be amended, but in practice, at least for the foreseeable future, it won't be.

@@crazyirishwarrior 3/4 of the States need to ratify an amendment. 2/3s of States can call a convention to propose amendments.

I kind of see what you are saying, but in practice, I do not believe that to be true. It says the right to keep and bear arms cannot be infringed, and any amendment to the constitution, that infringes the right to keep and bear arms is in violation of it. Don't think laws/amendments work that way though. If you repeal some law, or amendment, it stops being in effect the second you repeal it.

@@jamess6656 Right, but math tells us that if you can't get the 2/3, the 3/4 doesn't matter.

@@crazyirishwarrior That is what the math says, but you should understand what the document says.

It is.