What about Police Brutalities..

What about Police Reform..

What about Judicial Abuses..

What about Judicial Reform..

This was an amazing illustrated teaching ❤️ thanks so much. I had been searching for more information on the Constitutional Party. Appreciate you!

I know. This guys good.

CNN lies

Can't blame em when the DNC and GOP both actively work together to stifle any third party.

I agree. The Constitution Party needs to do a much better job of marketing and doing outreach through social media. They need to take some lessons from the Libertarian Party. The Libertarian Party has grown to almost 750,000 members and is on the ballot in almost all states. It is a little pathetic that the Constitution Party expects people to go out of their way to reach out and join the party instead of the party going out of its way to reach people. Maybe I am being too judgemental, but it is frustrating that third parties like this can't get more traction.

Me too, I love it, I want this for America

No problem! Thanks for watching!

It is also important to understand that they believe in Federalism so they aren't trying to impose many of these policies at a national level.

Thank you! :) I appreciate it.

Thank you for subscribing! :) I really appreciate it. :)

I'm a Constitutional Conservative (The same thing represented here really) and the major differences between us is we actually believe in small government. Many would say we're Anarchists in views which is absurd simply because we stand on the founding principles of this nation. A typical Conservative "says" they do, but votes against their beliefs. Not necessarily you, but in general. Also, most typical Conservatives are ok with police trampling on their constatutional rights and aiding the state in revenue. They say they're against it, but when push comes to shove they love the state. We often purpose ideas like privatized police force. Why? To keep the state from monetizing you so that you have control over the police force not the govenor. After all, you pay taxes for that already so why do they need to pick the public off for more money? They say it's to reduce accidents or whatever but the truth is, if that were the case, then why don't give tickets at the time of accidents and not when there isn't an injured party?

@@chasesmith2363 ok I’m wondering. I’m only 15 lol so I can’t vote, but am very much into politics. I’m a Conservative-Evangelical and I’ve been thinking about this party, do many people in this party like Capitalism? Because I’m a fan of it.

@@captainjayhawk658 yes, the video said it loves capitalism

@@captainjayhawk658 Yes, it's the only way to live! 😉

@@chasesmith2363 Yeah lol. I've grown a liking to the party. It's different than the Republicans. And me as a person would fit in both and even Libertarian.

Glad it was helpful! Thank you for being willing to share this video with others.

So you want to live in a dictatorship? The Revolutionary War was to DESTROY dictatorship and build a democracy. The Constitution Party wants an ISIS-like Christian dictatorship that kills gays, drug users, and forces women to undergo abortion in cases of rape and incest. The Constitution Party is COMMUNIST.

agreed. where would solidarity go

@@ericrodwell8706 yes it’s true they’re not right wing but they’re conservative on social issues and progressive in economics. Best in my opinion

@@ericrodwell8706 perfect. better than those liberals

@@excru3506 there neither really but nowadays if your not some insane Trump supporter your liberal so

@DJ Rice Actually Libertarianism can stretch across the political spectrum except the extreme left and right. Socialist libertarians exist.

Glad you like them!

Our current political environment does not publicize these parties, and greatly promotes the two front and center parties over third parties. While I would like for this to be my vote, I ultimately know as an individual that it would be wasted.

@Brett Clayton It will never become more relevant then. They actually need people to vote for them to achieve that. Sometimes it may be necessary to vote for Republicans as the lesser of 2 evils (e.g. in high stakes close elections like the Georgia runoff) but if we want freedom loving parties like this to win we need to vote for them.

@@3218574 Isn't the "lesser of two evils" still evil?

Can you help us to understand why there is so little marketing by the Constitutional Party? Many people that I talk to don't even know about the party. Thanks for your help 👍🏽

@@TheElleFactorAgain HI Elle, there as been arguments over the fact 3rd parties are denied access to the Presidential debates. The two parties make the rules to limit competition. But it violates the Equal Protection Clause. The 2 partirs say if we can get enough votes, then we don't deserve to debate the 2 major parties. But how can we get our voice out there if denied access? It's difficult to get a voice in op-eds when editorial boards consider far right. Imagine, wanting to insure the Rule of Law is enforced is considered far right wing. This propaganda is pushed by both Democrats and Republicans to limit our voice. But if we do not return to the Rule of Law (the Constitution) we become a democracy governed by lawless mob rule, as we have today. The Constitution confines and limits the power of government, but democracy rules without limits. American voters must understand this, or our Bill of Rights become meaningless.

We already see potus cab make federal law, vaccine mandates and such, which violates ARTICLE I, SEC 1. Congress believes it can create and pass any arbitrary law it wishes, in violation of ARTICLE I, SEC 8. I believe it was around 1919, the federal gov wanted to ban booze, but lacked authority by law. So they pushed for an amendment the correct way. Today, they rule over drugs, housing, Healthcare, and many other things unauthorized by ARTICLE I, SEC 8. It's all unconstitutional and it violates ours and States rights.

@@monkeystank5241 I appreciate you taking the time to reply which has really helped me understand the barriers. I had been searching for information to educate myself. So thank you so much🤗 Take care

@@TheElleFactorAgain You're very welcome. Good luck.

Thank you! :)

Consitution party is basically Republican Party

@@historylover1914 nope

@@historylover1914 but worse

Thank you! I appreciate the support!

Wow, I wasn’t even aware that all these existed. But yes, I’ll get around to them. I think they’d be useful in the political world.

@@IllustratetoEducate I didn't either until I received my ballot for the general election. The reform party is not listed on it, but I found them through a web search, and are apparently still around after being popular during elections in the '90s.

zjh908 thank you for suggesting these!

There are all sorts of minor political parties in the US, some of which used to relevant but maybe aren't so much anymore. The Prohibition Party is still a thing for example.

Glad it was helpful!

I know currently, none are elected in those positions, but as of July 2020, there are 26 members who have been elected to city council seats and other municipal offices. Not sure how many are running this year.

"AS ALWAYS" really?

bindlex_ dnb he is just stating that he enjoys the videos. Nice of him to say that, although there’s lots of room for improvement.

Yes, some states to have Constitution Party Candidates currently running for Governor i.e. Al Pisano in NC.

i think they call themselves republicans

I would choose a Libertarian Conservative party if there was one, but not, so I choose Republican

@@familyguyshorts42069 Can we bring back the Bull Moose Party?

Agreed

I would favor Libertarians, but legalising drugs is not really my thing, you know?

@@Washius bull moose party is progressive lol

It all seems good on paper till u see the actual candidates

It's far right, bordering on fascism.

They’re literally running Don Blankenship, Al McWhiggin’s evil twin, for president. He had a whole coal mine scandal that caused him to go to prison for a short period of time and ruined his West Virginia senatorial campaign

@@MrBloxy-wz1zb every one i don't like is hitler

@@tomjohn6337 I'm sorry I don't understand what you said. Hitler was fascist, by the way.

I’d have to say the same thing myself. I’m a blend of the two

Greens care more about the enviorment, pursue a more pacfist foreighn policy and are more ecomocially progressive

But he is focusing alot on the religious aspect and i dont agree with all that. For example im pro choice and think the government should let any 2 consenting adults get married

I actually have one on the Green Party already. Go check it out!

@@IllustratetoEducate thanks for telling me!

yes! :)

Awesome! I will. I’ll add it to the list. Thanks!

It's kind of hard to grow without the popular funding

Basically, multiple parties.

Glad the videos were helpful for you!

I am registered as a libertarian but I am a constitutionalist. I don't agree with some of the state level policies of the constitutionalist party though I oppose force legalization or criminalization at a federal level as I believe in Federalism and oppose the Leviathan.

Yes I would. If you have ideas on popular topics, I'll add them to the list.

@@IllustratetoEducate Canadian conservative party leadership race is one I watched

Kind of. I would say they have the libertarian party’s economic beliefs and a more extreme version of the Republican party’s social/cultural beliefs. They’re further right-wing than both the Republican and libertarian parties.

If it's not broken why fix it? Also, why would it be considered "extreme right"? If that be the case then all these principles you claim are extreme were applied at the beginning of this nations existence. So... People like Thomas Jefferson are extreme right? Abraham Lincoln? George Washington? John Q Adams? Andrew Jackson? (Most of them.were Democratic-Republican) I mean Thomas Jefferson (arguably the greatest president to ever live) was a Democrat! The fact is, you should have the right to be free from Government influences. Education, religion, food, media and so on are great examples of how you are being manipulated. Though we stand on Biblical principles, we do not disagree with a person's right to practice as they wish. I think when you people hear "Bible" you automatically assume we are like Rome or Britain! 😆

What's extreme about any of this?

@@MrNobody-fk7fc - you sound a little racist right now 😏

Sidney only extremists at this point doing the looting, mass brainwashing, disinformation on social media,are the corrupt hollywood democrats.

@@rd2071 Correct, however, isn't it funny that anything aimed at government corruption is considered a conspiracy or extreme? Yet they will go to the ends of the earth to paint these rioters as peaceful! I mean, if things weren't so obvious right?

The 1990 budget passed by the Democratic house raised taxes in an effort to cut the imploding deficits. Bush went along with it, breaking his campaign pledge. It caused a fracture within the party leading up to ‘92. Pat Buchanan challenged him for the nomination and Clinton and Perot used it as leverage against him.

@@johnperic6860 not even close

@James Ellis Both the Constitution and Republican Parties are socially and economically right wing. 150 years ago, the republicans were centre left

Not really....they are against endless wars and marriage of government and corporation (aka fascism) This is exactly the opposite the Republicans want

It's basically a Christian, conservative, and somewhat libertarian party.

@@orangeanarchy235 No 150 years ago the Democrats were center right

It will never get anywhere... I’m English and I’m afraid politics here are to entrenched with the two parties Tory and Labour. Because of FPTP it’s hard for any party to get anywhere near government.. The SNP are the only real challengers in politics here... & that’s only in Scotland. Local government is the only real hope for new/small parties.

The perverts have brainwashed you well. They pervert the Bible to their liking - taking passages out of context. Jesus said to "judge righteous judgment." _John 7:24 Judge not according to the appearance, but _*_judge righteous judgment._*

@@libertypastor1307Ok for starters don’t start a discussion with an insult and secondly I was referring to a verse and nothing else therefore my opinion is not based on what people have told me but purely what I’ve read in the Holy Bible “You, therefore, have no excuse, you who pass judgment on someone else, for at whatever point you judge another, you are condemning yourself, because you who pass judgment do the same things.” Romans 2:1

Have you seen the Republican Vs Democrat videos?

A corrupt joke, just like their bed fellow Dems.

The politicians in both of the main parties are wealthy individuals who would benefit more from the constitution party’s policies, which have been pushed more secretively by both the Republican and democratic parties despite them making campaign promises to not push those policies so much. They can’t say too much about those policies outright because they want to retain support from most of the American people.

CaptainWilliam interesting theory! 👍🏼

This is straight from their platform: We affirm the God-given legal personhood of all human beings from fertilization to natural death, without exception. The first duty of the law is to protect innocent life, created in the image of God. No level of civil government may legalize or fund the taking of life without​​ justification. Legalizing the termination of innocent life of the born or unborn, whether by abortion, infanticide, euthanasia or suicide, is a direct violation of their unalienable right to life. As to matters of rape and incest, we empathize with those​​ abused and assert the need to provide immediate protection and care in a safe environment. Instead of the further violence of abortion, the mother and the child should be provided with compassionate care. We find it unconscionable to take the life of an innocent child for the crimes of his father.

@@IllustratetoEducate hmm none of these parties fit my ideals perfectly I took the political spectrum and I was in the libertarian zone but I stilll dont agree with all there stuff

@@aquaticsplashes well you gotta at least agree that *suicide* and *abuse* is not good..

@@ivon1671 you speaking way out of context who mentioned that

very

​@@chrisstiegman4070 The way it was worded in the video made it sound like they didn't acknowledge the 16th amendment. I mean if it has to do with not agreeing with it then thats a completely different argument. Don't say its unconstitutional when it totally is by definition. Instead you should say it ought to be unconstitutional. Now that being said I know how it was ratified I know my history. But when you say unconstitutional I think it contradicts the constitution which is the highest law of the land. A law can contradict itself but the latest law over rules the older law the constitution can also contradict itself via amendments. In which case the latest amendment over rules the contradicted rule. Example the 18th and 21st amendments. But the law can not contradict the constitution because the constitution superscedes laws under it. So you can't make laws that limit free speech because of the first amendment. Federal Laws superscedes state laws meaning that the states law can not save you from federal law. However, a state law can in some capacity contradict federal law. (I have forgotten why thats possible so i will have to brush up on how governments work.) Thats how its possible for a federal law saying weed is illigal but a state could say it is legal. (Its a complicated thing) Anyway I do have disagreements with your statements on how it was made by "spoiled authoritarians" but that being said I am not in disagreement that income tax is not right. I personally don't care as long as the government doesn't squander my money like they already do. Really I would be willing to let them tax my oncome if they would pass an amendment that forces the governement to have a balanced budget. And really you don't even need that, Texas doesn't have a state income tax yet it pays out more to the federal government than it takes from it and it has a balanced budget required by the state constitution. ALL THE WHILE HAVING TO MAKE A NEW BUDGET EVERY 2 YEARS INSTEAD OF 1!!! This is because our legislatures only has one congressional session every 2 years. It only meets for more sessions in emergancies. Those sessions are called special sessions and they are hyper focused on issues at hand such as Covid laws. BTW to my knowledge they haven't met for any covid laws everything has been by state order. Anyway, I don't like income taxes because of how our government has wasted money on nothing. I would allow it to continue if they passed a balanced budget amendment.

​@@chrisstiegman4070 Did I not say in the video? Honestly, don't really care enough about this party to find out how accurate the video was. Thats because the CP isn't even relevant enough to be on the ballot. Ok thats good they Acknowledge the 16th amendment. They don't like it, I can see why.... I didn't say in my response to your comment that the CP was saying it is unconstitutonal but I can see where you might have thought I was. So let me clear this up. The person who made this video should have been more accurate on their views by saying they believe income tax ought to be unconstitutional, instead of saying they believe it is. Now if you will excuse me I am going to go back to not caring about the CP until they actually make some headlines.

@@ejallen3829 or you could come to the libertarian party like a boss 😎

@@jeborismonke3270 I mean I do see myself as more conservative libertarian but I only really vote Republican because I do not like the Democratic party. (mostly for hypocrisy and corruption and the way they want to seize control of the everyday American in the guise of minority freedom)

@@ejallen3829 How can you know how it was ratified, when it wasn't? You should read "The Law That Never Was".

yea which means FDA is not doing their damn job

@@naturaldisaster2 not exactly the fda made sure that gets corrected when that happens and shuts them down if they don't no fda means everybody getting sick and people can die indiscriminately

Yes.....as with all parties. Some just have more power and money to force their ideologies on Americans (i.e., the 2 party system!)

The constitution party does have many very similar views to the Republican parties. Most Republican politicians are rich people who would benefit from the policies the constitution party would push. Many of those policies are actually around today to a large extent, such as low taxes (usually for the rich), low minimum wage, less government control of the economy (which means less services to be provided by a mostly non profit-motive driven government that would help lower and middle class people more than profit-motive driven corporations would), and strict immigration policy. If the U.S. had a proportional representation system, around 20% of current republican politicians would likely instead be part of the constitution party. The constitution party’s ideology is more or less dominant today, in this case it’s in the form of neoliberalism, which both Republican and Democratic Party politicians are in support of.

Stay in Japan.

Ok

You don't know Thomas Jefferson very well.

No where is it written in the constitution calling for a separation of church and state. It is not written in the declaration of independence, the articles of confederation, the constitution, or the Bill of Rights.

I’m sorry I can’t say, otherwise it would ruin the objectivity of the channel. But thanks for watching!

@@IllustratetoEducate ok well I’m a republican if u are cool if ur not that’s fine thx for replying

....so....you agree with Euthanasia and...**Suicide**. Wtaf

Our founding fathers wanted the church and state to be separate in order to protect the church from the state. (Not the state from the church)

@@mjo0311 both are important. Religion should not be influenced by government and government should not be influenced by religion

@@JdDiehl if it’s consensual, then yes

I get where you're coming from. I know most people don't agree with the Bible, but from a biblical perspective, God created 3 institutions: the family, the church, and the state. Biblically speaking, they are to be separate, as each has its own roles and responsibilities within its respective God-ordained jurisdiction. All 3 are responsible to God and not to one another, so while there is a separation of church and state, the king is still told to "Serve the the LORD with fear..." and "kiss the Son" (Psalms 2 11-12). Again, I know everyone won't agree with this, but I hope it at least made since. Respectfully.

Is he a Mormon?

No we’re in the constitution, the declaration of Independence, the articles of Confederation, or even the bill of Rights does it call for separation of church estate.