Oh this is such a brilliant lecture about Kant. The clarity is beyond applause. Thank you for putting it up and lectures like this deserves to be circulated around.

I just don't get anything. Categories and stuff. Why Kant named them like that. It confuses me so much. Waiting to hear his ethics. Hume restricted himself on it. Let see how Kant will. But I did get Humes epistemology and metaphysics.

18:49 The 3rd set of three categories is called: categorical, hypothetical and disjunctive, So one of the 12 categories is called "categorical?" This is confusing terminology. The same root word is used in two different meanings. Category, as I understand it, means a way to organize something, and I am not sure why it is chosen to name a thinking method (what is being organized). Categorical means without exceptions. I have originally thought that the term category stemmed from the "categorical", so that each thinking method is an absolute prescription that allows no deviation. But now that I see both terms used in "categorical category" I am confused about this terminology. Then at 23:35 all 12 categories are listed, and it becames clear that what is being classified under each category is a potential list of judgements. For example, under Cause and Effect category, we would include all judgements of the form "if A, then B." The "categorical" category is now named "Substance & Attribute" avoid the "categorical category" terminology. However, we get to the confusing terminology again in the next lecture, when we discuss "categorical imperative." In what meaning is "categorical" used here? As derived from category meaning classification of judgements, or as the word meaning "no ifs or buts." ?

Can we get a table of contents so we know which order to listen to the videos?

there are no extra dimensions.