Hi Michael, Thank you for your comment and many years of viewing! I really appreciate the fact that you have enjoyed my previous presentations. Although I haven't read Paul Brunton I agree with his comment. I'm always trying to balance intellectual rigor and empathy in interpretation of any data. I also usually do my best to recognize my bias and do my best to remove it from my analysis. Although this is not possible to achieve in any absolute sense, (we are always perceiving the world through the archetypal complexes in our natal chart and our biographical experience). Ultimately, I am attempting to perceive everything from a transpersonal perspective. The astrological perspective and quantum physics demonstrate the boundaries between any "thing" is arbitrarily placed there by our perception. After the election, I began my analysis of Trump because of his war on the truth and out of a sense of duty I felt to bring attention to his gaslighting, sociopathic narcissism, misogyny, racial divisiveness, and now betrayal of his constitutional requirements and the American people. I stated at the beginning of this project I was not going to attempt to withhold my bias due to the responsibility I felt to speak the truth as I see it. I should remember to bring that up at the beginning of every analysis. As far as your suggestion for balance. Well. I have taken in Fox News and right wing perspectives for balance for many years. I used to watch Glenn Beck from time to time back when he was on Fox. He's peddling right wing talking points (if not conspiracy theories). I checked out his KZfaq channel and the first video is from 5 months ago indicating he is one of the initiators of this inquiry into the supposed corruption of Hunter Biden. This is a blatant attempt to try and discredit Joe Biden for what can only be called a petty circumstances (which Joe is shown to have no involvement in what so ever) in contrast with the hundreds of millions of dollars Ivanka stands to make on copyright patents she is receiving from China. The hypocrisy is suffocating! Not to mention the fact that Trump never divested himself from his companies and is violation of emolument laws. Real time corruption! As I said, I have read, listened, and watched the other side for years. This is the most separation I have seen between the right wing narrative and the MSM. (BTW, I know the MSM is owned by hedge-funds and is deeply tied to the military industrial complex, so really the MSM is a voice of the moderate right, if anything.) I know they only allow certain voices, but they are middle of the road voices and all of the journalists are in competition with each other for every story (rather than colluding together to perpetrate a false narrative). The MSM always give the right wing perspective. Who they don't let on are people on the real left like Noam Chomsky etc. We are at turning point in history. Trump inviting China to investigate Biden is the type of transgression of the Constitution that the Impeachment clause was written for. I.e., to prevent a President from being influenced by or "colluding" with foreign powers to interfere with the sovereignty of our elections. The emphasis of the post is simple. Trump's lack of critical self-reflection leads to the projection of the shadow side of his natal chart and transits onto the world in vivid relief for all to see. And thus is an example of how the incorporation of an awareness of his complexes and transits could provide a perspective from which he could begin to move into a conscious relationship with archetypal forces informing his experience and align himself with the more noble expression of the complexes, rather than being a puppet of the shadow side and unconscious dimension of the archetypes. Which again is my opinion of what is happening. I will gladly accept histories judgment on the analysis. I hope you can get through the video. I would like to hear what you thoughts are on the alignments I explore. Thanks again for the comment! Warmly, Chad P.S. I haven't read any Jordan Peterson yet, but I actually agree with some ideas I have seen in his lectures. I am still absorbing his ideas.

Jordan Peterson says some important things but he is also very limited in his worldview. He really needs to take on Tarnas,s Cosmos and Psyche and astrology. He has a take on Jung and postmodernism that is very onesided. Keep speaking out chad!