You still have them, it is only your claim that they have been to the laundry...

@joelchummel I am glad to hear that Joel, however faith requires trust, something I am lacking in the religions of the world. Each claiming theirs is true, i cannot trust in any of them. Have a nice day also.

I accepted Christ into my life and my sins have been washed away

@@douglasmacgregor3878 thanks good I'm so happy for you

Mr x You needa do more research on the religions of the world. At best all will be ruled out leaving Muslim, Christianity, and Judaism six

amen!

Exactly

Let the dead bury the dead , Ron Wyatt discovered the ark was and still is where the Bible said it is , and the City of King David ,the city of David is older then the Dome , the new discoveries are old the fact that the Gehon springs are there makes sacrificial sense for the slaughtering of those animals , for whatever , religious reason under the law of Moses , this is Roman Greek , Rome Just Renamed the Greek Gods , Rome fell in love with Greek culture and There God's , for all sorts of creepy reasons , the law can't save us , Jesus is the fulfilment of the law ,he was sent to be the example of the meaning of life ,basic instructions before leaving earth , that's what the means for me BIBLE very basic instructions , ♥️♥️🙏🏽🙏💯♥️🙏🏽Aotearoa mean Maori mean NZ

they are looking for evidence i think

His name was Yahushua and He wasn't white

Now he is King of the Kingdom of the Lord , the one who send him here

It is the pseudo scientists and archeologists that are un comfortable marrying their "intellect" with fairy tales. hahahaa.

Well it is kind of like wanting to see the golden tablets of the Mormons, If things are true , they should not be hidden...

CENTRAL to the Apostolic Preaching is the FACT that the Tomb of Christ is EMPTY. Christianity is Not a "gnostic" religion -- "all in the head" or "all in the heart" (though both are vital!) It is an INCARNATIONAL Disclosure of GOD: There are specific Places where God Himself dwelt, walked, died, arose. Don't Cheapen the Realities of the Christian Message by dismissal of these significant places. Yes, we must come to know the LORD in a personal way, but not at the expense of the Realities of the Incarnation. It is clearly evident that the First Christians took people to the Tomb to show them the Evidence. This was a regular Pilgrimage site for a hundred years! One crude Latin inscription shows a ship & the inscription, "LORD, we have come!" So many pilgrims were coming that the perverted Roman Emperor Hadrian covered over the Tomb (as mentioned in this video), as well as the Cave in Bethlehem, in 135AD. He put pagan shrines in both places -- which actually Marked them for the local Christians. 'Do you want to know where it is? Right there, beneath that... ' Such was the persistence of the local accounts that when St Helena [Mother of Constantine, --NOT Constantine himself, contrary to implications in the video!] asked, the local Christians could tell her exactly where to look. The search was speedily rewarded with the Rediscovery of the Holy Places. And so the churches of the Resurrection and Nativity were raised on those exact spots. St Helena was 80 years old when she made her pilgrimage, so determined was she to visit the very exact places mentioned in the Gospel. Have you done that? It truly brings the Bible to life in such a vivid way!

@@christopherkelley7972 Pwahahahaaa. You've written a whole essay but provided Zero evidence or argument for the fact!!. Not unless The Jews of the time, these desert dwelling peasants, had the technology to preserve Mummies like the Egyptians did, then you had a bit of a point of the "empty tomb". I bet if you found Mary's tomb or Joseph's it would have been empty after the decomposition and scavenging of the remains by who knows what!!. Well, that is If you don't factor in the fact that these tombs may have been reused after generations!!. Remember we are talking of nomadic peasants here!!. Showing an empty tomb in the midst of other tombs with skeletons, considering the tomb was a shrine of some sort is not surprising!!.

@@christopherkelley7972 So the fact that we have that pilgrimage site in Mecca does that make Mohamed a Historically verified prophet??. There could have been an activist leader by that name. But let's not forget how Kings, leaders, worriers of the time, when the word of mouth was the only record. There is a tendency for glorifying the Legends!!. we all know the tale of Achilles!!. The great Greek Warrior!!.

Jesus Christ is our Risen King, Lord & saviour!

@david Paul you do not appear to believe in Jesus Christ, but what has made you watch this video? That is very strange from a non believer.

I can surely confirm, than I received a MIRACLE nearly 35 years ago.👸👼👸

@david Paul MIRACLES DO. I'm sorry for your opinion. BE blessed, my friend.

@@sharicrocker7162 what miracle did you receive?

I believed he was there. I believe🙏✝️🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

Whr?

He is within our soul, always.

@Don Espoleto Amen😉

Love your comments. It pierced my heart and soul. Thank you.

If you are filled with Gods Holy Spirit then Jesus lives within you 😇😇😇 That's how you have his power to overcome😇😇😇

You are all delusional twats.

Well there you go, another reason to doubt the validity of the matter....

@joelchummel appreciated.. we respect jesus same as we respect Muhammad .

@@mrx1278 there is not even a single doubt bro the Holy quran mention about jesus more than any other prophet.

@@tahirkhan000 so why print another book if you are using characters from an already published one? Does the obvious have to be pointed out to each and every one of you independently? These are both theories, not facts. You only have your "faith" in these things to rely on, and I find the "trusting in my faith" a little weak for any relevant groundwork for believing in something.

@@mrx1278 well previous books were also the words of the God as well and it was only for people of that time as it is mentioned in the Holy quran as well. And the God sent the last messenger Muhammad and sent last book which is Quran for all the humanity and then God says this book is for all the humanity and there will be no messenger again.God sent 124000 messengers.. if you still not satisfied please watch quran and the modern since for facts and figures.

Io

You iiooi

Iioooiiioiioiiiii

@JP Collider Thank you. God Bless You.

I t hi for Tiff to tyt ft try to ound ty TT FF they told orfytyyfyrftyttyfyyfy iyft rys if you want it it just told you if Tyler Y t yuf you for yo bday Y yuf Y t

His name was Yahushua and He wasn't white

@@tuch9992 who cares if he wasn't white. That's why this world at theses times are hard

Amen

No acording to the Bible the blood of Christ was trown for the salvation of everyone , Your blood is yours not Jesuscrist

Amen...

Martin H this is not correct. There were no crucifixions allowed with 2 kilometres of the Temple Mount. Sanhedrin Law. Sepulchral church way too close. Many archeologists have pointed out it was MUCH more likely, based on 1st century documents, both Roman and Jewish, to have been on the Mount of Olives, also peppered with Jewish cave tombs....all the way down the Kidron valley. Olives was highly visible, the sight of several road junctions, and a known execution site. And the romans used it. Sepulchre’s site was fixed by constantines dotty mother - hardly a scholar - as the locals told her any story they thought she wanted to hear. A real sucker. The so called “Jesus movement”, more properly John the Baptist’s movement had decamped hundreds of years before to Galilee via the decapolis, so all proper memory had already left Jerusalem, particularly after the Roman purges of 63 CE and 125 CE.

Vic Nurcombe what a bunch of nonsense you are writing about.If you have ever been just once in your life in Jerusalem then you would have known that the Mount of Olives bares no match for the description of the Crucifixion location.Furthermore Mount of Olives was never an execution site because it is far too close to the Temple rather than Golgotha which is well over 2kms.But even so the Sephardim law talks about no crucifixions and killings “within” Jerusalem walls.

@@Patoza21 I've lived in Israel....have you? My uncle was a biblical archeologist in Israel and in the Lebanon. I have been to his digs. Re the crucifixion, as usual, the gospels are very short on essential information. Matthew and Luke repeat Mark, who was their source. John also names the place as Golgotha-place of the Skull, but he adds a detail, “the place where Jesus was crucified was near the city,” thus visible to passersby (John 19:20). Golgotha is Aramaic for Skull. The more familiar name Calvary is based on the Latin Calvariae, or Skull, the word Jerome used when he translated the gospels into Latin. How or why the place got this name is unknown. There is a late Jewish tradition, known also by Christian fathers like Origen, that Adam’s skull was buried in Jerusalem, which accounts for the tradition so common in medieval art of placing a skull at the foot of the cross. Some have speculated that the name might be related to “Goliath,” based on the text of Samuel that mentions David bringing his severed head to Jerusalem (1 Samuel 17:54). Others have seen the name as describing a despicable place of execution, where skulls and bones would be strewn about. Still others, have seen it more as a physical description-perhaps of a craggy rock-like hillock that gave the appearance of a skull (Bill Sulesky pointed out that Julius Caesar was also buried at a “place of the skull,” according to Appian, Civil Wars bk 2). What none of these texts explicitly say is anything about a hill called Golgotha or Calvary, so familiar in Christian tradition, but the idea does have support in other texts. So where is Golgotha? Can it be located? And why would it be called the “place of the Skull?” There are two traditional sites in Jerusalem that tourists go to. The oldest and most revered is of course the 4th century Church of the Holy Sepulchre, the holiest site in Christendom, honored by Roman Catholics, Greek Orthodox and other Eastern branches of Christianity, Helena, the devout mother of Constantine, the first Christian Emperor. In the time of Jesus the area was a rock quarry just outside the northern city wall. The problem with this location, is that there is absolutely no connection of Jesus to the site before the early 4th century-approximately 300 years after the time of Jesus. Helena, the pious mother of Constantine, the Roman Emperor, is the first one to give it her stamp of approval and consecrate it as the location of Golgotha, but it has no other basis in any of our historical records. As Helena at that time was told many strange things, wildly wrong, by locals eager to get a pay-off from a credulous tourist, especially for “relics”, it’s a serious problem. The “Protestant” site, outside the Old City walls, just north of the Damascus Gate, “Gordon’s Calvary” or the Garden Tomb, after its “discoverer”. He suggested the location on a visit to Jerusalem in 1882, impressed by the elevated craggy rock outcropping that he thought resembled a skull, and a nearby ancient tomb with an entrance sealed with a rolling stone. The main problem with this site is that the tomb adjacent to this hill has been definitively dated to the Iron Age, which would preclude it being the newly hewn tomb used by Joseph of Arimathea in the time of Jesus. Besides, General Gordon, a direct descendant of mine, was a raving lunatic, as can be discerned in his very strange autobiography. He has zero credibility. The idea that the crucifixion took place on the Mount of Olives, was expressed in a little book published by the late Ernest Martin titled The Place of Christ’s Crucifixion: Its Discovery and Significance (Foundation for Biblical Research, 1984). Although Martin independently came to his view that the crucifixion of Jesus took place on the Mount of Olives, after publishing his first work he discovered the views of Nikos Kokkinos (1980) who had developed a somewhat different argument related to the notion that the crucifixion would have taken place at the scene of Jesus’ arrest, based on Roman law, thus near the Garden of Gethsemane at the foot of the Mt of Olives. Later Martin also noted the views published by W. J. Hutchinson in the Palestine Exploration Quarterly (1873, 115; also 1870, 379-381), that Jesus’ crucifixion must have taken place somewhere EAST of the Temple Mount. The basic case for the Mt. of Olives being the site of Jesus’ crucifixion rests on several interrelated arguments of varying evidential strength. 1) The first, and in my view, the most weighty, is a passage in the New Testament book of Hebrews (13:10-13) that speaks of “going outside the city gate,” to a specific altar that was not inside the Temple, but “outside the camp.” This is a clear and unmistakable reference to the Eastern Gate, leading to the Mt of Olives, and the Miphqad altar located on its slopes. It was at this spot that the Red Heifer (parah ‘adamah) was burnt to provide the essential ashes for cleansing all things related to Temple worship (Numbers 19). The Talmud and Mishnah are clear that this altar was located 2000 cubits, outside the Eastern Gate, on the slopes of the Mt. of Olives (bYoma 68a, mSanhedrin 6:1). The author of the book of Hebrews makes use of this essential sacrificial practice, “outside the camp,” to establish the legitimacy of Jesus being crucified “outside the gate.” Rather than a gate on the north of the city, the Eastern Gate is really the only one that would make sense in this passage. This image of the Red Heifer, that had to be “without spot or blemish” was picked up by the early Christians as the most fitting allegorical image of Jesus’ own cleansing sacrifice, with the “sprinkling” of his blood likened to that of the water prepared with the ashes of the Red Heifer. The writer of Hebrews, preserving pre-70 CE traditions, subsequently lost after the destruction of two Jewish Revolts and the establishment of Jerusalem as Aelia Capitolina by Hadrian, seems to be reflecting some actual take on the geography of Jerusalem and is able to make a very effective point to his readers based on Jesus being crucified east of the city, outside the gate, on the Mt. of Olives. 2) The Acts of Pilate (aka Gospel of Nicodemus IX.5) preserves a tradition that Jesus was sent away by Pilate with two malefactors named Dysmas and Gestas, to be crucified in the garden where he was arrested-Gethsemane, which all our gospel sources agree was across the Kidron on the slopes of the Mt of Olives. As Prof. Kokkinos demonstrated, this was in keeping with Roman law. 3) The Hebrew Gospel of Matthew (preserved by Ibn Shaprut in his work Even Bohan), published by George Howard, refers to the site of the crucifixion, in Hebrew, as Har Golgotha, which means a “mountain” or “hill,” and certainly not the little….the tiny!!…. outcropping of rock preserved at the stone quarry where the Church of the Holy Sepulchre now stands. This is one of our earliest records of Golgotha being called a “hill” or “mountain,” which seems to have become a popular notion in Christian lore and legend down through the ages. 4) Josephus says that during the Jewish revolt (66-70 CE) as many as 500 Jewish victims per day were crucified “before the wall of the city,” in order to terrorize the population (War 5:289; 5:449-450). That is, on the Mt. of Olives, before the main city gate, with the Romans camped just to the north on Mt Scopus. This was the only location that could be seen by anyone in the city of Jerusalem, and the week Jesus died it would be visible to passersby arriving from all directions for the Passover feast, thus providing a visible warning to those who might be tempted to sympathize with rebels. The traditional site of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre fits none of this evidence. By the time Constantine’s mother, queen Helena came to Jerusalem, in the early 4th century, there was no memory of the original tomb of Jesus or the site of the crucifixion, as that oral tradition, that would have belonged to the Jerusalem Church, led by James and Simon, brothers of Jesus, had long ago perished. The tomb and monument area she was shown, by a stone quarry, most likely was the tomb of John Hyrcanus, that is often mentioned by Josephus as precisely in that area. On my own exploration of the site, I confirmed the bedrock area, flat and just above the site of the miphqad altar, that also seemed to me to be an idea location for crucifixion as alluded to in the book of Hebrews and “in front of the city wall” as Josephus indicated. It is directly in front of the Eastern Gate, looking into the courtyard of the Temple. Nearby are lots of 1st century tombs, as well as an oil-press (Gethsemane/Gat Shemen means “press of oil), and lots of Olive Orchards. None of these features fit the quarry area just north of the 1st century city wall, where the Church of the Holy Sepulchre is.

Vic Nurcombe I am not going to argue further. I see no point since you have such a strong justification for yourself. Two issues: If we assume that your argument is true, then the procession of Christ carrying the cross starting from the Pretorium in order to reach Mount of Olives would have passed through the Temple (located at that time) to reach the mount of Olives -either via Golden Gate or Beautiful Gate- or best chance to exit via Sheep Gate which is a few meters away from the Temple Entrance. Highly improbable.... Second the Golgotha hill was highly visible for those coming from Bethlehem Hebron and Gaza from the west and from those coming from Caesaria and Schemem and also the route to Emmaus and Joppa at the time. And these were the main entrances to the city from the most populated regions within Judea and Samaria. Nevertheless to mentioned the hundred of miracles that took and are taking place in Golgotha and especially with the Holly Light during the Orthodox Passover Have a nice day

nick pat these are interesting points. Who are you quoting when you say “visible from Hebron and Gaza......Caesaria”??

Because it is a visual remnant of the actual burial and resurrection of Christ. It proves to us who weren't there to see it that it actually existed.

oldwarrant4 he’s real, history and science proved it. (Most scientists are Christians)

Why look for the Tomb now ... U will see Him Here soon ...Alive and Strong. Seek Him in the Living Not in the Dead

You have penned my thoughts exactly.

david Paul jesus existed, and there is TONS of proofs

I agree with you

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/bLChd7t93LjafIE.html

@@babygreattv6656 Video unavailable. What was it, may I ask?

@Dale Westphal they say that at 33:05

Sorry dude someone lit the candles with a fire producing human tool ( like a match or lighter). They didn't spontaneously combust.

Mr x But you know it’s not normal fire right? There’s footage of people putting it all over themselves without getting harmed. That shows that it’s something from above not man made

@@demia5621 I don't believe so, people have been using fire trickery to fool others for as long as there has been fire and someone who has become educated in it's properties.

Snuff that out!

Good explanation. You did great with a mixture of logic, science and biblical story.

@@nasimulrizu786 Thank you for the kind comment.. It may interest you to know that archaeologists have uncovered the original road from Siloam to the (believed) Temple area - the road being some 60 feet below the later surface, thus proving more Biblical stories and their locations. You can see much more of this, and other sites in "The Watchman" - a Christian/Jewish site that is available every week on KZfaq, and comes under the main site, CUFI.

So true Charles, thank you. Really appreciate your mention of Ron Wyatt, he was a Godly man indeed. The Church of the Holy Sepulchre, they said in this video, was built over an older "Pagan Temple". The R.C.C. have built many churches over pagan sites, a disturbing thought to say the least.

@@canadiankewldude Thank you for your kind comment Canadian' '.. Yes, I get a very strong feeling that Wyatt was a true believer, although he had been a former 7th Day Adventist, which perhaps shows that God works in mysterious ways! It's worth watching his videos on Mount Sinai, Sodom and Gomorrah, etc. It's interesting to note that many, more modern RC churches - especially in the Middle East, are built alongside or close to Muslim Mosques or former pagan sites. Disturbing? I'll say. However, I don't follow the RC doctrines in any fashion! If you like these kind of videos, I might suggest you watch the very many archaeological digs going on in and around Jerusalem and the Holy Land. Try "The Watchman" which is a Christian/Jewish site following these digs. They have a regular weekly slot on KZfaq, and keep up to date with chats and tours.

@@reggriffiths5769 The Watchman you say, thank you I will check it out, sounds wonderful. God Bless.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/bLChd7t93LjafIE.html

Get a job.

@JP Collider prove he didnt say that

God is The life!Jesus is son of God,not God!

@@petrurares2470 how do you know? are you the personal biographer that you know this? or are you the personal assistent of god that you know this?

Citation needed.

The Roman emperor was not Caligula (ca. 40AD), but Hadrian (135AD), after he had suppressed the Second Jewish Revolt. BOTH of them were very wicked men.

@@nonprogrediestregredi1711 not Caligula Hadrian has marked the spot by building Venus and Jupiter Temple to prevent Christians from visiting the tomb , evidence of this comes from Eusebius , Jerome in his 58th letter to paulinus , Socrates Scholaiticus 5th century greek historian

@@christfollower5713 Sure, good one. It's quite telling to me that your first "evidence", as you referred to it, comes from Eusebius of Ceasarea, who self admittedly thought it appropriate to tell falsehoods to propagate Christianity. Not to mention, it's over two centuries after the supposed "prevention", yet there is no mention of tomb veneration from early Christian writings, as would have been the tradition. Christian scholars have even noted this. It makes little sense in light of the Jewish customs of the period.

The second emperor was the wicked Hadrian, nearly a century after the demented Caligula. Hadrian resented both Judaism & Christianity for objecting to his ‘life-style.’ So he tried to obliterate its holy places,

Then you begin to realize that people are out there looking for an 'empty' tomb.

The history of Joseph after the resurrection says that he went to England.

...Robert...should you take a gander at Num. 19:1 - 9, you will see Joseph, his actions, and his tomb....all you have to do is see Jesus in that process..........bless...

@@maple1212 I would love to see a citation for that assertion.

Actually, Robert, we have evidence spread through the century following the Resurrection that Christian pilgrims came there constantly, some having sailed a goodly distance. They left their inscriptions to that effect. Then, in 135AD, the wicked pervert emperor Hadrian covered over the spot, to keep the pilgrims away. He built a pagan temple of Venus above it, i.e., a house of prostitution, to "pollute" the site, to repell the Christians. But that became their Marker for the next 200 years, until St Helena came, when they told her precisely where to look. In the first Apostles' Preaching, the EMPTY TOMB was a key piece of evidence, to which they could point all of Jerusalem's people, and many pilgrim visitors. Thus we have no doubt, St Joseph of Arimathea did NOT use it for himself later. He had DONATED the Tomb for Jesus. Joseph "gave it up." Other evidence we now have shows that he treated this as a Royal Burial for the Messiah, without expectation of what was to come 3 days later. He did not "take back" his Donation.

@Christian Cullen don't come in my email saying aweful about my savior Jesus suffered for the world even tho you say bad things about jesus he still loves you because he died for the world but I have to delete you cause I won't have some one talk bad about Jesus bless the the name of Jesus you respect Jesus if you can't then your out and don't come back in my email Jesus lay down his life for the world

You have a vivid imagination to visualise a fire when you watch this. But you guys always seemed a little weird to me, frankly

@@mrx1278 What's interesting - and I'm not a fan of religion, btw - is the trait atheists and evangelicals share: A common obsession with the beliefs of others. Those of us who savor irony are well fed in these comment sections where both, seemingly disparate factions await one another's contempt. Here's to humanity finally seeing each other as One.

David Robins I agree with you. He has risen and that is all that matters

They are looking for His tomb, not His body.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/bLChd7t93LjafIE.html

@@douglasmacgregor3878 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/bLChd7t93LjafIE.html

@@douglasmacgregor3878 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/bLChd7t93LjafIE.html

Agreed, but both are important. Praise Jesus!

"Why aren't you looking for my burial site instead of looking for my return?" - Mathew 78:12

Jackie, the Apostle St Peter, on Pentecost, invited the crowd to check it out. The Judean authorities KNEW the Tomb was empty. It was Factual Evidence that pointed to resurrection. It still IS! Once someone Knows the Tomb is empty, then the Fact of Jesus’ physical Resurrection begins to be comprehended. The Living LORD still makes Himself known.

St Peter testified on Pentecost, May 24, 33AD, that His Tomb could be visited. It was EVIDENCE. So many people Did. It was Marked for that reason. It STILL is Evidence.

Validating his tomb brings his presence closer to us as He makes His way back to us, imo. If we found His name there and early relics that would be definitive. But they say that Helen brought many relics back to Constantinople with her. Maybe the ones Eusebius say were definitive evidence?

indeed ,,we miss him dearly and im pretty sure we are aproaching the time the angels called the mark of the beast when he met them in the ark of covenant grotto ,,, pandemic ,vaccin and the mark implanted in it ,,,,,stay strong brothers and sisters and refuse the vaccin ,,,

Guys, seriously. Ron Wyatt was not an archaeologist. I dare call him a fake, but he didn't rely on credible sources, facts, etc. His conclusions were completely fictional. And besides, the ark of the covenant has never been lost.

@@whitneyprice6098 ahahahahah no wonder you would say that ..

@@maiko7772 fuck off you delusional twat.

Wyatt was a huge fraud. A fraud and a scam artist of literally Biblical proportions.

Piss off you delusional twat.

You didn't watch the whole Video. Gordon was wrong and that has been proven by Archeological Scholars. However, the Garden Tomb is a great way to keep the Evangelicals out of the Holy Sepulchre. In the Garden Tomb they can scream, cry and sing as much as they want without disturbing those who visit the real Tomb.

@LoveOfParadise Well, if you took the time to watch six videos on the subject, you must have done it purely to find something to mock and ridicule - a sure sign of someone with no sense of morality or human decency! If you want to be critical, make your "intelligent" objections and reasons for them clear, rather than play the mocking game.

@LoveOfParadise But an extended laugh followed by claiming they're "idiots and fools" in the same breath, most definitely is!! Why not be honest, instead of trying cover up your own foolish comments!

@LoveOfParadise Be very careful, for that might be your last laugh before The Judgement! Guess who'll be looking stupid then?

@LoveOfParadise I don't know what you watched or whatever claims were made, but it's a truism that (many) people wil believe anything they're told, especially when it concerns their religious faith. There have always been arguments and debates about religious sites and their true locations, because there are often so many that suddenly come to light through archaeological digs, new finds of some kind, or some new previously undiscovered manuscript. A perfect example of this is the Turin Shroud which has been the subject of thousands of debates over the last 30 years or more. If you happen to be a Roman Catholic, the chances are that you will believe it was the actual shroud covering Jesus in the tomb. Some Christians believe it, many others do not... but here's the thing: No-one is telling lies about it! As for the true tomb, there is evidence for and against all of those found through archaeological digs - some fit the Biblical description perfectly, and others "might or might not" fit, due to the destruction of Jerusalem in AD47, so not enough evidence is present. That does not stop some believers professing their belief that this one or that one is the real one. That does not mean they are lying; it might mean however, that their faith or belief is perhaps a little askew. The truth is less apparent, for there is no concrete evidence to prove any is the real tomb. Personally, I believe the Garden Tomb may well be the real tomb, but whether or not I am right, makes no difference whatsoever to my faith, nor should what I believe - other than the Gospel - be of interest to anyone.An open mind is much better than a dogmatic unbelief or put-down. Different branches of the Christian faith have different interpretations of Biblical works, so it would be quite wrong for one side to say another was wrong, but even then, nobody is actually tellings lies, but simply affirming their own interpretation and belief. So all of us need to be mindful not to mock; much better to engage in debate and perhaps, just perhaps, occasionally be a little critical, providing we have a justified alternative based on scripture Unfortunately, there are videos and programmes that deliberately set out to denigrate anything religious - and specifically anything Christian. Such productions will use any lies to remove people's faith, and these come from a mixture of aetheists, pagans, non-believers and non-Christians as well as trolls who have nothing better to do except cause hurt to those who have done nothing to hurt them. All of them in the above list will lie through their teeth, purely because they don't want God in any shape or form. The chief group of liars are the Evolutionists who follow the Darwinian Theories which include the idea that every living thing has a common ancestor.- a now scientically-proven fallacious argument. Indeed, there is now so much scientific proof that supports almost every event, place and activity mentioned in the Bible, that Darwin/Evolution Theory has been consigned to the trashcan where it belongs, because it has little to no validity or verification. So, my friend, if you don't believe Christianity, that's OK; If you haven't read or understood the Bible, that's OK as well; and if you believe in Evolution, I feel sorry that you've had such a bad education! Personally, I've always followed a simple theme, which is "Don't mock what you don't understand." If I think someone has made a stupid and/or unsound, ridiculous comment, I challenge it, but never mock it if that's what they believe.

@LoveOfParadise First you make the "Lies" statement, and then you asked "Which tomb." I've answered and responded with explanation - but for whatever reason you have totally disregarded all that and changed tack., which makes it clear to me that you are actually just trolling to force an argument - a classic ruse used by trollers who love to start a debate but refuse to take part, and also change the subject. It's all a big game for those who have nothing better to fill their lives. Sorry, but I won't play that game, and I end all further communication with you.

Yes, very weird. History 101.

Queen Helena searched for the cross

Yes she did search for the cross but also searched for the tomb among other findings and she had the churches built on the sights of her findings.

@@bernadetteverret2569 some people who like to object always , say that Helena is the one discovered and other says Constantine , and other say thats contradiction in the story , actually , St Helena is the one travelled Jerusalem because she was very passionate about Christ , and every decision she takes constantine implements what she says and wish , she is his mother the Queen of course , but important thing to say , the tomb of Christ was not seceretly known to Helena in a divine revelation as the 3 Crosses she discovered , but it was already known to the people of the city as Hadrian built over it a pagan temple , so he marked the spot for 180 years till Constantine reigned , thats why the Holy Sepulchre Church is the authentic burial place of Christ supported by history

@@christfollower5713 You have one of the best answers on this page; makes perfect sense. Word of mouth history would have been very strong in a locality like that. In a historical sense it was a short time between great event and Helena's studies/work. Christ's tomb of a couple nights not that hard to find. And thanks for your loud and gaudy tip, Hadrian!

ttiwuwotteto it tyyttwtut tyt

You have no right to consign your children to that lightless death cult.

How do you intend to prove such a claim? Or are you saying you need no proof just faith, like the rest of your religion.... Empty words

You are absolutely correct. The Garden Tomb. It is near Gordon's Calvery, which looks like a skull. All crucifixions were outside the city wall on the main route to the city. The Garden Tomb site has a wine press and a large cistern. It is believed that there was a vineyard. That the landowner was most probably Joseph from Arimathea.

@@colinhartung8952 Something of that importance should have been marked better since it is a focal point of the Christian religion.

@@mrx1278 Ron Wyatt discovered the crucifixion site in the same area. He discovered the cave of Jeremiah below the site, with the Arch of the Covenant, and the other Temple belongings. It was hidden all these years to be revealed by Yehovah at His appointed time.

@@mrx1278 love thy neighbor.

What do you mean less than 3? You point that out 3 times and I still dont know what you are talking about.

I agree.

So what is your point, I think most intelligent people do not need that pointed out to them, as we have read books on the great religions of the world. It is common knowledge, so again what is your point of saying that?

@@mrx1278 what is your point in trying to silence the truth he spoke? get it yet? you've got to get rid of that evil in you.

Yes but islam has a wrong Jesus!

Mine too!

He paid for my sins, and set me free!!. I am free indeed!!

@Abraham Mani fuck off you delusional twat.

Jesus is alive an well in Mexico making some of the best tacos viva los tacos

I agree with u..pls add me whats app +966573013800

Jesus was the leader of a cult

@@Lifeofsonny Stop your lies

His soul might have risen, but does that mean his earthly body did?

@@charlotteshifflett3550 i mean… even in the modern age… this wud be seen as a cult and the politicians leverage its identity politics to control the population

Be ny 9eacr

That's the place and Jesus's blood actually fell on the mercy seat!

amen ,,ron wyatt was right ,,,i turned a follower of yeshua thanks to him ,,,bless his name ,in the name of our lord

Unfortunately, the garden tomb is not a first century tomb... it's from the days of the kings. The Holy Sepulchre, as little as some may want to believe it, is the authentic location.

I believe it is too PaulaakaPaben

@@whitneyprice6098 yeah right ..because helena said so ? ..you are so funny

@Abraham Mani oh look another delusional twat.

No one wants the responsibility of an ignorant broke vagabond. You need to pray harder for that selfish wish...

@@mrx1278 why are you so hateful towards commenters on the internet? you seem broken, friend.

Should he not rule without coming to do that? Can your god not stay in place to do this? Why do you think your god has to show up here, of all the places in the universe, to do anything? Do you not see through this babble as a crock?