Incidence and prevalence

Рет қаралды 230,728

Rahul Patwari

11 жыл бұрын

Take #2

Пікірлер: 64

@Worminthedirt 2 жыл бұрын

Hallelujah I came across this video. Strugglong with the denominator of incidence and this helped thank you!

@sk8ter975 4 жыл бұрын

Awesome content. Very direct, concise. Thank you Mr.Rahul Patwari!

@charlettexy-zaobnimaga5583 4 жыл бұрын

thank you sir...this helps me understand my report :) god bless

@taimarashika 4 жыл бұрын

Thank you sir ❤ your explanation is easy and to the point helped me a lot

@streetbeats1672 3 жыл бұрын

Perfect illustration, thanks a lot!

@chroniclesofasurgeon 6 жыл бұрын

Thank you sir...You made everything easy :)

@robertclifford01 10 жыл бұрын

Simple and straight forward. Thank you.

@kyilin9792 8 ай бұрын

Thank you sir for your explanation. I've got clear understanding for incidence and prevalence.

@kenyattamachimwa4682 3 жыл бұрын

Thank you for this presentation,, it's helpful somehow

@oldblueday 10 жыл бұрын

Thanks, I'm glad it helped.

@Star-gh9ir 7 ай бұрын

10 years later. It’s still helping a lot more people thank you

@tdaiene 3 жыл бұрын

Thank you for your help!

@estherdevries3672 7 жыл бұрын

Rahul nice videos. I am working in cancer epi, and teaching population epidemiology. You did a nice job. If you don´t mind I will recommend your youtubes in case the students would like to hear an alternative way of explanation! Just one comment... in minute 4 you discuss the persons at risk, but you omit the person-time (you just take the number of persons). Why did you not take the time at risk during the 10 years into account in your explanation?

@renugarg8835 3 жыл бұрын

VERY Good explanation of incidence and prevalent

@chinmayeechavan5724 Жыл бұрын

You are genius, ..this is exactly what I needed, explaining topics with relevant examples makes so much sense of what we are actually studying ! Thank you so much for putting up this video.

@faithadesuyi9620 Ай бұрын

I will guess you are a musician, loving you sister.😎

@rohanjyothinagaram9507 6 жыл бұрын

Thank you for these videos, I am currently working on an MPH and have been struggling with my intro Epi course this semester. These have been so helpful!

@captfalconXX 10 жыл бұрын

Thanks. Great explanation !!!!

@gardenprento 3 жыл бұрын

Thank you!! I have an epi exam coming up and this really helped

@jessicar.4941 3 жыл бұрын

This is the point prevalence. I think the result is different if it is period prevalence. Great video.

@prtysha07 10 жыл бұрын

Finally made sense! Thank you

@shaneycollins5713 2 жыл бұрын

Really helpful! Thank you!

@roselynewia8215 3 ай бұрын

Very well simplified, however, I though the denominator for the incidence would have been 5 and not 6 considering that the 6th person developed cancer after the 10 year period...?

@danaheavrin3265 4 ай бұрын

This video is 10 years old but it just saved me in my graduate level epi class!

@bee4068 2 жыл бұрын

THANK YOU SO MUCH THIS REALLY HELPED

@Brickkzz 9 жыл бұрын

your videos are great! have you considered making videos on the pathology of various disorders?

@Brickkzz 9 жыл бұрын

pathology and pathogenesis*

@afnana3746 3 жыл бұрын

You are awesome !

@jasonshoongeleni5184 4 жыл бұрын

proper and well explained

@Iyke_Olivia Жыл бұрын

hi wanted to ask, if you were not given a duration and was asked to calculate overall prevalence, it should just be the prevalence formula right?

@karcicegi5366 5 жыл бұрын

Thank you so much

@salairouklianching3249 3 жыл бұрын

What measure of disease frequency combines prevalence and incidence?

@shafeeqarmstrong2731 6 жыл бұрын

Hi Rahul, I am curious why you DIDN'T count the number of person years in your calculation of incidence in this video whereas in your last example (your other video) of incidence you did?

@atereolusola2497 2 жыл бұрын

Incidence is different from incidence rate

@evgeniyamiller4503 8 жыл бұрын

Thank you!!!

@sarahaliceluffman7915 5 жыл бұрын

If an individual has multiple new cases does that affect the incidence?

@albiner1999 5 жыл бұрын

Sarah, Greetings. Yes, some conditions such as myocardial infarction, fracture, adverse reactions, etc may have multiple episodes occurring within the same individual. First, for us to consider multiple episodes within an individual, he/she must have full recovery between episodes. Once this criteria is fulfilled, the usual way of calculation is via person-duration or person-years. For instance, 18 myocardial infarctions (MIs) were experienced among 157 individuals followed up each for two years. In that arm, during a period of 314 person-years of follow-up, the rate is (18 divided by 314) = 0.057 per person-year or 5.7 per 100 person-years. The 18 MIs arose through 12 patients having single MIs and 3 patients each having 2 MI. So, to your query, if there are multiple cases occurring, yes - the incidence would go up.

@leeluscious2354 3 жыл бұрын

Thank you

@ruhelahmad6548 10 жыл бұрын

thank u alot ,

@mohamedhussein8126 5 жыл бұрын

Thanks dear

@meryamlazrak1329 Жыл бұрын

thank you sir

@missvongz 10 жыл бұрын

THANK YOU!!!

@mysthatheodore6493 6 жыл бұрын

good

@alejandragrumbles8232 3 жыл бұрын

Thanks to you I finally got it

@kuldeeppoonia340 3 жыл бұрын

Plzz give me right option of this Epidemiology is used to determine the...............Of a condition. A. Prevalence B. Incidence C. Both

@FavorpassGoal 2 ай бұрын

Prevalence. Errbody is involved at x time. Count them all including the RIPs, substract those.

@ashakrishna8934 9 жыл бұрын

dr patwari were do you get 0.66 i am preparing for usmle step 3 i find bio stats really tough i listen to all your tapes they are great can you please tell me how it is 0.66

@deesmith3410 9 жыл бұрын

6 people were at risk; 4 got cancer during the time frame. 4/6 = 0.66

@sanadbenali6993 9 жыл бұрын

Dee Smith one of the six never got cancer how does the study chart show he is at risk not just a fluke or something

@albiner1999 5 жыл бұрын

@@sanadbenali6993 Greetings. Risk means probability of acquiring the condition and importantly must not have the condition in question at the start of the time frame. Six individuals at the start of the time frame, did not have the condition YET, so these six is calculated as the denominator irrespective of whether they end up with the condition.

@sanadbenali6993 5 жыл бұрын

@@albiner1999 how would you justify calculating the control as a at risk a guy never gets cancer even after years with followup which i think Is bad protocol that person is no longer in a study both the control and the guy who got cancer later would be a bad choice right?

@maryhannah9685 3 жыл бұрын

i still dont get how you got "6" people at risk of cancer at 5:05, it says "never had cancer" .... shouldn't it be 5 cases of 'at risk for cancer?'

@dilaraesmer 3 жыл бұрын

Not having cancer within the specified time does not mean that they are not at risk, it just means that the disease has not yet occurred. I think 6 people were taken for this reason.

@talaldghaily2924 2 жыл бұрын

Hello can u help me in some exercises

@MrHAPPYHAWAIIAN Жыл бұрын

DEATH FACE 🤡🤣😂🤯👍

@michaeltuchman9656 2 жыл бұрын

Writing 4 out of 6 as 0.67 would have made it a little easier to follow, even though your meanng was clear.

@a.m.alsaadi7789 2 жыл бұрын

people that had cancer cannot be at risk because they already have it now. i don't get it how he counted them with the people at risk that's confusing

@chinmayeechavan5724 Жыл бұрын

It's the time frame in which we are counting the risk, ....these people had the risk and caught the disease , both within the the time considered , .......in case if you say those who caught the disease in the given time (who previously were at risk before acquiring the disease) shouldn't be counted ...then you will end up counting only those people who are not affected by the disease , which in this example will be 1 ..and that would be a different entity