My God is an awesome God. He reigns from heaven above. With wisdom power and love.
@courag1 Жыл бұрын
It is as though modern education is designed more to hide the facts, than to reveal them! God gave us a wonderful mind, but like with the little vanilla bee and the vanilla orchid, we can’t really see or appreciate the incredible world we live in apart from the eye of faith. That small spark of “ah-ha!”, which brings the realization that this world we live in, could not have been any other way but “created” - all at one moment in a series of days, as nothing would have been able to survive waiting for millions of years for its food to arrive! We live in an incredible world made by the wisest of the most wise Creator. With all the wonders of the world, the wonder of a God who envisioned all that is, created it all, and then sent Jesus to give Himself for us, all the more incredible. May those who see all this and realize Your Wisdom and Your Truth, oh Lord God, render unto You the love and worship you have desired! Maranatha, Lord Jesus!
@FrankPCarpi Жыл бұрын
It's all just so brilliant! He keeps track of every single atomic particle everywhere at once! How can we ever even come close to fathoming the depths of the Lord Yeshua Messiah's attributes?! We will be learning more about our King throughout eternity, and every moment (at least until we enter timelessness after the 1000 years) we're going to be knocked down with His glory.
@VaxtorT Жыл бұрын
Facebook won't allow this series to be shared because someone was offended and claims the series is abusive. Imagine that. What could possibly be found to be abusive about this series?
@josephnebeker7976 Жыл бұрын
The fact that it "denies the science of evolution". Obviously racist 😏
@debraolson7553 Жыл бұрын
Join Wimkin it better than FB & you have total freedom of speech, privacy from advertising & they're putting up there version of TikTok but better🤷
@baronblitzvonregensburg4932 Жыл бұрын
Abusive for Satan, Fauchi, Gates&Co. Because Satan can ONLY destroy. he can never create.
@lewiscarey6984 Жыл бұрын
The offence is that it DESTROYS RELIGION OF EVOLUTION! To think this is offensive is a head scratcher! ✝️✝️✝️
@jefferywilson327924 күн бұрын
.
@JeremiahKalani Жыл бұрын
Glory to God Jesus Christ!!! Amen
@4-mylrdjesus417 Жыл бұрын
PROBLEMS WITH RADIOMETRIC DATING[ The following is on carbon-14, but also applies to every other method of radiometric dating. ] As an analogy, think of walking into a room in which you find a burning candle, after being in the room for a while the candle goes out. The only things you can know(while the candle was burning and while you remained in the room) are: the rate at which the candle was burning, and the current atmospheric conditions. You cannot know the original length of the candle before it was lit. You cannot know if the atmospheric conditions in the room were constant before you entered the room(e.g. did the oxygen/nitrogen levels vary over time?), you can not know if the candle burned at the same rate before you entered the room. Likewise with carbon dating: you do not know how much of the 'daughter' product(C14) was present in the specimen at the time of death. You cannot know how much of the 'parent' product(N2) was available in the atmosphere prior to the time of death (e.g. air pockets found in amber show that O2 levels were around 32% at the time the pine sap solidified; proving that the atmosphere was vastly different in the past. Current level of O2 is around 20%). Furthermore, you cannot know if the levels of solar radiation (a major contributor in converting N2 -> C14) were different from today's, prior to the death of the specimen. - This is just an excerpt of the things that would not be known to us. Carbon dating along with any other radiometric dating method are useless, due to insufficient data. Furthermore, there are vast ( and proven ) age differences in Radiometric results, found while dating the same specimen at different sites (these differences also occur when re-dating a specimen at the same site). All we can know from radioactive decay is its current rate of decay. We cannot know the initial conditions, the amount of parent-substance found in the host, Nor can we know if the rate of decay changed over time. --ALL THAT CAN BE SAID ABOUT C14 DATING IS THAT IT IS AN UPPER LIMIT ON AGE, ONLY IF THE RATE OF DECAY WAS CONSISTENT WITH THE CURRENT RATE. NONE OF THE INITIAL CONDITIONS CAN NOT BE DETERMINED, AND THIS HOLDS FOR ANY RADIOMETRIC DATING TECHNIQUE!! WHO REALLY WERE THE FOUNDERS OF THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION? Have you ever looked into the "evidence" that naturalists claim they have, or do you blindly regurgitate what you've been indoctrinated to believe? Think about it for a moment; have you truly looked into the matter, or do you simply take it to be true because someone claiming to be an expert told you so? Anyone looking into these claims, would soon find that claims and reality are two very different things. The zealously held belief of naturalists have led to countless hoaxes and deceptions(Piltdown Man, Nebraska-man, Lucy, etc.). The reason for promoting a purely naturalistic view, fall into one of the following, employment retention; most scientist are blackballed if they don't go along with the naturalist view, a severely blinding indoctrination, or worse yet, the hated notion of a creator due to pride and the interference this may cause to perverse life-styles. Evolution is a faith, it is based exclusively on assumptions that cannot be verified, and as you will see, it actually goes against well established scientific laws. All of the original proponents of this atheistic worldview lived depraved lives. Most of them were not scientists, contrary to what you are led to believe, and some were outright con-men. Take Charles Darwin for an example, a child-man that dropped out of medical school and later out of seminary school. Charles' father got him his first job as a cabin-boy on the HMS Beagle. Charles had no training as a naturalist, he was a lazy flunky, his own father regarded him as a disappointment. It was on the Beagle where he got his perverted ideas regarding evolution. He married his first cousin, because he believed (due to his views on evolution) that it would be a genetic benefit to do so. The majority of his children died, some of suicide, and the rest from genetic problems. Several of his children, the ones that did survive were severely retarded. Another one of these humanists was, Aldous Huxley, he admitted that his zeal in promoting this world view, came from his desire to change societal morays, so as to accommodate his sexual lusts[see, Confession Of A Professed Atheist, 1966] (do a little research into the humanist founding fathers and you will see that they all led depraved lives). The biological model these 'experts' claim they have, would not qualify as a model in any other field, they implement no data, have no equations, no variables, no constants, nor any statistical assumptions. These models are purely imaginary, consisting of pictures and lines on paper, they have no substance. The reason for their existence is to promote an atheistic worldview--in essence a religious belief. I offer you an exceedingly better 'religious belief', one that has transcended time, it proclaims the true means of creation, all of it's prophecies so far have been fulfilled and many are being fulfilled in our time, all of it's archaeological evidences are true, it describes the nature of fallen man, and it shows us how to be reconciled with GOD. -- remember that there's no man that knows all things, not even a fraction of all there is to be known; do not believe those that say "there is no God"
@hozn Жыл бұрын
Dr kent hovind recommended this movie. Such amazing designs from God.
@marchyman5061 Жыл бұрын
Ahh.. good to know! I just sent the link to Kent.. didn’t realize he already knew about this. 🙏🏼🙏🏼 To God be the glory!!
@eugenehuyser Жыл бұрын
Love mr kents stuff!
@Gweidemann Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the heads-up! I really appreciate Dr. Kent and his work in evangelism • he witty, astute, humorous, enlightening, challenging, courageous, wise, interesting and intelligent.
@chrisbrooks4032 Жыл бұрын
Blahahaha Dr!!!!!!!! N
@debraolson7553 Жыл бұрын
@@chrisbrooks4032 Your lack of intelligence is showing 🤦
@YECBIB2 жыл бұрын
I don't understand how we got one evolutionist , unless we found them under a rock.
@ianmonk6211 Жыл бұрын
Satan. is behind all ungodliness.
@norbertjendruschj9121 Жыл бұрын
Maybe you should just read a biology textbook. Next you would say: I don't understand how we got one creationist, unless we found them in a church.
@ianmonk6211 Жыл бұрын
@@norbertjendruschj9121 😂 Real biologists are telling you evolution couldn't make life happen. And proving it You should watch James Tours. series on abiogenesis
@norbertjendruschj9121 Жыл бұрын
@@ianmonk6211 Great! You are starting your answer with the "true scotsman" fallacy. And I talked about evolution, not about abiogenesis so in your next sentence you just changed the topic. You are passing the lackmus test for the creationist argumentation style with flying colors.
@ianmonk6211 Жыл бұрын
@@norbertjendruschj9121 lol evolution alleges life started without prior life. Biology proves this is impossible. So I suggest you connect the dots as I did. :)
@jonathansmith7065 Жыл бұрын
This is all God folks!!
@debraolson7553 Жыл бұрын
Absolutely & it's amazing & beautiful!
@mac9869 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for a wonderful presentation of God’s creativity! It was a blessing to me! ✝️
@evertbakker5307 Жыл бұрын
Incredible creatures from the Creation
@horationelson57 Жыл бұрын
Fascinating new material. Thank you for sharing. Cheers from Australia
@lindawarner7496 Жыл бұрын
Praise to creator God!
@andrewthomas2353 Жыл бұрын
This is amazing! Thank you for sharing this with us!
@bigcountrymountainman9740 Жыл бұрын
When a horse is standing with his head up/standing upright and also when he is walking or trotting, but especially when he is Galloping because his body is more straight headlong, anyway, he can see 358° around his entire head. There's a one degree blind spot in front of his nose and a 1° blind spot directly between his ears at the back of his head that he cannot see. Other than that, he can see pretty much 360° around him
@chrismessier7094 Жыл бұрын
@All About Britain lol 😀don't forget, the code for the feature had to "evolve" in lockstep i don't have enough faith to believe that information systems carrying instructions requiring translation, and error correction mechanisms to boot, are the result of unguided, blind, piecemeal, purposeless physicochemical reactions
@chrismessier7094 Жыл бұрын
@All About Britain i can appreciate that. but the matter of faith is on both sides. whether macro evolution/common ancestry ever occurred is yet to be demonstratred _in vivo_ it remains that physicochemical forces have no observed ability to drive atoms towards an encoded informational system requiring translation and error correction mechanisms
@chrismessier7094 Жыл бұрын
@Richard Fox i see the mountains are _against_ believing a blind, unguided, piecemeal, purposeless process resulted in a system of encoded instructions giving rise to the plethora of biological phenomena we see, from error correction mechanisms at the micro level, to echo location at the macro i used to be an atheist and believed the darwinian narrative unquestioningly
@chrismessier7094 Жыл бұрын
@All About Britain without a repeatable, verifiable demonstration of common ancestry, the materialist uses faith to explain biology again, physics plus time does not guide atoms into encoded instruction bearing systems.
@chrismessier7094 Жыл бұрын
@Richard Fox your claims are unsupported except by a materialistic faith
@JoseAvila-nv3hb2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for posting. Lil kids will see it!
@4-mylrdjesus417 Жыл бұрын
'An Evolving Mechanism Is A System Or Subsystem That Undergoes A Gain Of Complexity Over Time'--ON EVOLUTION. All mutations seen in nature have gone through a transformation that is at its core opposite and fundamentally at odds with the notion of 'evolution'. An 'evolving' mechanism is by definition a system or subsystem that is undergoing a gain in its complexity[i.e. information] over time--what is truly happening you can call 'DE-evolution' if you like. EVOLUTION(not even a good theory) requires an increase of information over time, and not a decrease as we see with every example put forth by mainstream science, while claiming to demonstrate the validity of this religiously held belief, called Naturalism[i.e. that everything came into existence by blind-luck]. Thermodynamics, information theory, and common-sense, show that everything in the cosmos IS FALLING APART, quite the opposite to the insane idea that things are coming together in complexity, by blind chance. WHAT WE SEE IS EXACTLY WHAT WE WOULD EXPECT OF A CURSED CREATION! Selection is not evolution, all of the information is available in the DNA code, which under the right conditions will be selected. No new code has ever been introduced! COULD ANY OF YOU EVOLUTIONISTS EXPLAIN THE FOLLOWING HOW did the universe come from a dot-of-nothing exploding( i.e. "The Big-bang", which is one of the many [idiotic] claims put forth by the so called “experts” )? WHERE was this dot-of-nothing located? Was it inside of nothing? If so, how were they distinguished from one another? HOW do you give "nothing" its locality? WHAT was the nature of the agency that caused this dot-of-nothing to explode? I.e. there must have been something else around to cause this dot to explode, else it would remain in a perpetual unchanged static-state. Having established that there must have been an agency in existence and separate from the dot, that would cause this dot to explode, WHERE was this agency located, and HOW do you distinguish it from GOD? HOW does gas come together to form a star, in defiance of Boyle's Law?( i.e. you can't compress a gas into a solid ). If we were to ignore Boyle's law for the moment, WHERE did the gravitational forces come from that pulled the elements together into forming the first stars? Matter that is traveling in a straight line from an origin at the center of an explosion( i.e. "The Big-bang" ), in a vacuum, would continue in a straight line forever, unless something would cause it to alter its trajectory( "a body in motion will remain in motion", and it would also take the "path of least resistance" ), however, evolutionists say that there was nothing else in existence; WHAT then caused the elements to slow down, and to turn toward each-other so as to fuse together? Today, if we were to place gas molecules together, in any amount, they will move apart due to collisions, having insufficient gravitational mass to overcome this outward force, WHY are we supposed to believe, at some time in the distant past, that this was possible?! If the gravitational pull of stars is needed to form other stars, WHERE did the original stars come from? HOW do you reconcile the observation of an explosion occurring today, which will always result in chaos, with the claim of evolutionists, that order resulted from an explosion that occurred in the ancient past? HOW does a-bio-genesis work in real life? HOW exactly does rain falling on a rock for a long time produce life? Yes, we have all been indoctrinated to believe we came from apes, please show me the evidence and step me through the whole process! HAVE you ever seen any kind of animal turn into another kind? For example: a cat into a dog? a mosquito into a whale? I've seen many types of dogs but all remain as dogs, likewise with cats, birds, etc. Show me the many transitional forms in the fossil record. THERE ARE NONE! The only mutations observed are destructive ones(i.e. a loss of information, e.g. eyes disappearing, limbs disappearing, etc.). In order for evolution to work you need the opposite type of mutation, one that will increase information, not decrease it! By the way, destructive mutations are exactly what we would expect to occur in a universe that is slowly dying of radiant-heat loss. The second law of thermodynamics, information theory, and common sense, clearly show that order(information being a form of order) is lost over time. It is impossible for order to arise without an agency causing it, in our universe!!! This is a very short list of the hundreds of inconsistencies within the religious belief of evolution!
@misfittoytower2 жыл бұрын
I weigh over 200 pounds, but I got to ride an ostrich when I was in Vietnam. It was a very cool experience! 😁
@WhereTwoWaysMet Жыл бұрын
Amen!
@chrisnor6743 Жыл бұрын
loved this series!
@williamyalen6167Ай бұрын
At 18:09, Dr. Martin says that the ostrich "*EVOLVED* from some sort of large bird that used to fly" - in a video that is purported to be about "Creatures That Defy Evolution" evolution. So, that's very contradictory and confusing. What's the true message?
@lindabentley8578 Жыл бұрын
God is so amazing! Thank you for such interesting material - it's almost unbelievable - but I know it's true.
@FLG232 Жыл бұрын
The incredible story of creation with the creator at the helm
@bryanfongo3272 ай бұрын
The fact that he says that they bred horses and yet didn't get something else like cows or pigs just proves a fundamental misunderstanding of the whole concept of what evolution is and how it works and how fast.
@modzerkorbatoАй бұрын
i`ve search on this topic and i found that evolution as the say can happen rappedly in a short time span it`s called rapid evolution wich contradict the idea that evolution take millions of years to happenson said creatur
@YECBIB Жыл бұрын
Excellent 💯✝️
@garyharris4008 Жыл бұрын
Ostrich: America tried to grow because of egg size & immunity, as well as being 98% protein. A neighbor raises Emus I had my appendix out. I'm always cold & sick, have bad knees & ankles (age, yes; running on concrete). I want to be an ostrich with energy of humming bird.
@ryanvandyke96849 ай бұрын
More people need to see this series For real!
@k363011 ай бұрын
An amazing series. Truly our God is AWEsome. And consider this. The horse is made from grass. An epiphany I had a few yrs ago. God has made a code that can turn grass into living animals. Or the 8 puppies my dog had, made from the dog food i fed her. Evolutionists explain that please. Obviously the sum is far greater than the parts, and God gives life to all
@hammalammadingdong624427 күн бұрын
Horses metabolize some of the nutrients in grass. They aren’t “made of grass”.
@k363027 күн бұрын
@hammalammadingdong6244 yes they are. Literally all the building material for horses comes from grass and water. Impossible by darwinian processes
@hammalammadingdong624427 күн бұрын
@@k3630 there’s nothing about horses eating grass which makes evolution impossible.
@k363027 күн бұрын
@hammalammadingdong6244 thats because evolutionists are very shallow thinkers. It's not logical or rational that a random process can build a horse from grass. The level of complexity involved to rearrange grass into a horse is beyond our comprehension, and defies darwinism completely. It has been intelligently engineered at every level. Atomic engineering, chemical engineering, molecular engineering and machinery within the cells, DNA coding, structural engineering in the bones, mechanical engineering for the heart, electrical wiring etc etc.
@tabasdezh10 ай бұрын
The tile had to be Incredible Creatures That Defy natural selection, not evolution. Great video and thanks for sharing.
@Renfield372 жыл бұрын
columbus didnt land in america he landed in south america and called it san salvador.. he wasnt the first one to span the globe anyway
@josephnebeker7976 Жыл бұрын
"Columbus didn't land in america he landed in south AMERICA..." Go back to school
@infamouskasloe8183 ай бұрын
I love these films
@fernandofierro7958 Жыл бұрын
💓FATHER💖 made every thing
@TheManFromDonair Жыл бұрын
All creatures defy evolution.
@nakiaboyr6196 Жыл бұрын
Read them in this order and see what God will reveal to you. John 1:3 - Isaiah 54:5 - Exodus 19:8 - Jeremiah 31:31-33 - Jeremiah 3:8 - Deuteronomy 24:1-4 - Romans 7:1-6 - 2 Corinthians 11:2 - 1 Peter 1:7-12 - 1 Corinthians 2:8 - Revelation 12:17 - Revelation 19:9
@lizamay3703 Жыл бұрын
Denying God/Creator of whole existence is denying true science and the real true scientist.
@gpomeroy Жыл бұрын
Hallelujah
@hozn Жыл бұрын
I’m having trouble find a researcher’s work about extremely low heart rate of a sleeping manatee. They only write about the rate when it’s diving (30bpm).
@dreamarouse3197 Жыл бұрын
If evolution was the answer then plants should rule the world because they are alive and have been here since the beginning
@bulldurham2465 Жыл бұрын
the doc explains thing the way they are
@hammalammadingdong624427 күн бұрын
The dentist did not refute science.
@username2516 Жыл бұрын
My fav video lik this
@camulasmars9989 Жыл бұрын
Evil'Lution is bull!!
@chris.asi_romeo Жыл бұрын
Pump evolution theory to the toilet 🚽🪠
@qinoqino76432 жыл бұрын
It would be super if you showed the fossils along with all of these
@garyjaensch7143 Жыл бұрын
It would be good if Cambridge University marketed the fact that it found that Australian Aborigines languages are only 4000 years old, and the Sahara and Antartica and the steppes and artic( woolly mammoths actually went extinct around 4500 years ago) had massive amounts of vegetation suddenly disappearing around 4500 years ago, meaning uniformitarian and evolution theory’s are truly absurd, as co2 and oxygen levels must have been significantly higher back then, well worth studying the work of Michael J Oard, and watch his flood geology series, and read his work on woolly mammoths, but most importantly , read the word of God constantly, and wonder why the leader of the Anglican Church and the leader of the Catholic Church, are highlighting and praising Islam, who deny the most important precept of the Bible, Islam Denys Jesus was crucified!
@djirate052380 Жыл бұрын
@All About Britain satan is the author of confusion. There is ZERO observable evidence for what you say and none for evolution either or the big bang or any other manipulated data to spout thier hypothesis' as fact. They lie bro snd you are confused.
@rickdavis2235 Жыл бұрын
@All About Britain " It would be lovely - however none of what you said is true. Aboriginal people in Australia have been there for around 50,000 years. The oldest surviving art is at least 17,000 years. " According to who? Science? The only evolution that can be observed is speciation/adaptation. Everything else is conjecture, philosophical arguments, faked fossiles, CGI, and prejudicial bias.
@debraolson7553 Жыл бұрын
@@allaboutbritain3367 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@joelcarter2535 Жыл бұрын
@All About Britain that was proven wrong
@jefferywilson327924 күн бұрын
Sure you do. For those who refuse to acknowledge that God exists it's the excuse they needed not to believe.
@marchyman5061 Жыл бұрын
What if creatures could change colors, but other creatures couldn’t see colors?
@jontypmcguire2 жыл бұрын
Moa egg is bigger and the biggest bird
@jonnywatts2970 Жыл бұрын
Oh. It was God. Silly me.
@hammalammadingdong624427 күн бұрын
I’m less than five minutes into this video and I already know that it’s a big steaming pile of creationist crap.
@sarahburke8433 Жыл бұрын
There's a bee on an island that used to have lots of different flowers but the bee only likes yellow flowers, now there's only yellow flowers on that island. Things happen bcuz mutations that work get passed on.. that's how the muscle evolved to have the lure that attracted the fish... It's that simple
@marianistdevotee264 ай бұрын
Mutations can only hurt organisms' chances of survival, not help them. Also, mutations destroy genetic information.
@branominal5 ай бұрын
0:50 "was darwin right?" Yes, darwin was right
@anekaye4446 Жыл бұрын
All ppl need to see these! Schools should definitely stop spreading the lies of evolution. GLORY TO OUR HOLY CREATOR WHO ISSO POWERFUL AND PERFECT IN MIGHT AND STRENGTH AND MERCY AND LOVE FROM EVERLASTING TO EVERLASTING 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
@hammalammadingdong624427 күн бұрын
Science classes teaches evolution because it is the only scientific explanation for biodiversity. Your disregard or ignorance of this fact does not impact the educational curriculum.
@followerofjesuschrist1424 Жыл бұрын
No such thing as evolution
@gsgidney Жыл бұрын
10:48 No, Columbus did NOT bring horses to the American Indians. 1. Columbus never made it to North America 2. The Indians ready used horses long before the thought to sail west. While I agree with creation, you have to cite history facts to lend credibility to your presentation
@hammalammadingdong624427 күн бұрын
It’s gonna take a lot more than that correction for him to gain credibility.
@qinoqino76432 жыл бұрын
Skipped again at penguins
@qinoqino76432 жыл бұрын
It's skipping at the butterfly just before hatching=missed what was said . Same thing happened in last video at an important part
@allysondoerfler8688 Жыл бұрын
Next time find someone who actually knows how to ride a horse.
@Healitnow Жыл бұрын
The Christian Challenge! If you want to know if the spiritual side is true or not just take 30 seconds now and do this. Pray the following. Jesus I believe in you, forgive me my sins, come into my life, and help me to live it better. If there is no God you have your answer (30 seconds wasted without any harm done), and if their is a God you have made the best decision of your life. Take this challenge and settle the issue quick and easy
@debraolson7553 Жыл бұрын
Saying the words don't save anyone without understanding & meaning it🤦
@ozowen5961 Жыл бұрын
Good grief, this is tiresome. He keeps referring to Darwin as if the Theory stopped there. Darwin certainly does not have the last word on evolution.
@daleswart6953 Жыл бұрын
First of all l whole hardly disagree with the premise of this video I find it to be extremely bias and lacking scientific method . The reason the honeybee hasn't evolved in all these millions of years is cuz it's perfect for what it does and doesn't need to evolve
@toosiyabrandt8676 Жыл бұрын
Hi LOL! NEITHER DOES ANYTHING ELSE! ‘ PERFECTION’ in the theory of evolution is the eventual DESTINATION, NOT THE STARTING POINT! PERFECTION IN THE BEGINNING = GOD MADE IT! As in ‘ And God saw that it was GOOD, and the evening and the morning were the second day’! Shalom to us only in Christ Yeshua returning soon to reign over the world government from Jerusalem.
@debraolson7553 Жыл бұрын
Dale🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@davethompson9776 Жыл бұрын
Evolution and god claims are not even related. Even if evolution was proven false (it’s not), you still need to prove god (you can’t).
@debraolson7553 Жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@stefanos6284 Жыл бұрын
Darwin explained everything , in the right way ,with scientific support , without religion brains wash
@ianmonk6211 Жыл бұрын
but his explanation has no proof :) So it's a religion not science. To be science it has to be observed testable and repeatable. There is not one missing link to prove it, therefore not observed not testable not repeatable. The beauty of God is He doesn't brainwash us He gives us free will. Will to choose to believe in Him or not.
@graysonaudette3525 Жыл бұрын
This entire film is just an argument from incredulity, which is a logical fallacy
@ianmonk6211 Жыл бұрын
yeh, irreducible complexity doesn't cut it for you. No brainwashed evolutionist will accept it.
@graysonaudette3525 Жыл бұрын
@@ianmonk6211 that’s because irreducible complexity doesn’t exist. It’s been debunked. Each component can be broken down into a series of steps where each successive step is beneficial in its own right.
@ianmonk6211 Жыл бұрын
@@graysonaudette3525 so you can function without your lungs can you? likewise you could hunt your food before your eyes evolved? The debunking is more evolution imagination. That's why evolution invented punctuated equilibrium. There is no slow evolution process.
@graysonaudette3525 Жыл бұрын
@@ianmonk6211 No, that’s a non sequitur. The apes that evolved into humans still had eyes and lungs. You don’t even seem to understand the irreducible complexity argument. The argument rest on needing to evolve multiple features in a single step. Your examples of eyes and lungs have nothing to do with Behe’s argument about irreducible complexity. Apes and monkeys still have eyes and lungs. If you’re asking about when eyes and lungs first developed, eyes began as light sensitive cells. There are still single cells today that have light sensitive organelles, and there are single cells that are not light sensitive and they still find good just fine. Eyes are not irreducibly complex. Same for lungs, which developed in fish. There are lots of fish today that have lungs that don’t need them to breath. Like coelacanths and other boney fish. They have both gills and lungs. So again, not irreducibly complex because they’re not required to pop up fully formed the fish can still breath through its gills. Punctuated equilibrium still involves macroevolution that takes place over thousands of generations and hundred of thousands if not millions of years. It’s simply faster by comparison to more graduated equilibrium but it’s still much slower than just 6,000 years.
@ianmonk6211 Жыл бұрын
@@graysonaudette3525 from your theory of evolution at some point your step by step process something was evolving that needed eyes and lungs There is not one fossil record of such a missing link. Not one animal is partially formed. They are all of one kind fully formed. i e. a bat is a bat fish a fish whale a whale bear a bear croc a croc which brings me to the point evolution is a croc 😂