I lived with a few Sikhs in college. Very fascinating religion

I wish this type of comment was normal on youtube!

When people put their differences behind and treat others with respect. Wonderful things happens. No one likes a self centered disrespectful people no matter who they worship.

@John Smitb What west? And India lied about Britian making their nation?

@John Smitb bruh, I am a Muslim, and dont really like India or Hinduism, but I know the Swastika you mention is a traditionally Hindu symbol before Hitler had it.

We will come, or you can kindly walk up to any Sikh

Yup a True Sikh will never shy away to help you.

True

All cok and bull

@@beryanbeyaan8047 You are a hindu.

Yes, I can see the movements are similar to Shaolin martial art!

@@peterlau291 it's similar to south indian martial arts called Kalaripayattu

Yes I know about It

But the Shaolin martial art have become much faster and stronger after it have bring to China

Only the Chinese aren’t too keen on admitting this.

It was not banned in Karnataka under the Mysore Wodeyars nor was it banned in Coorg.

@@williamwang8352 according to a number of Kalaripayattu masters of Kerala , they themselves said in various videos that it was banned in a number of places. Good that Wodeyars didn't ban it 🙏🏽

@@williamwang8352 Am sure it was not banned in Coorg. The true fighters & generals of India

@@saumyajitbhaduri1083 It ain't banned in Sydney, Bruh. Am with a Kalari gym

@@koala9128 I'm talking about the British time in India

Listed are some contradictions in Sikhism : It teaches the contradictory concepts of God being Sargun i.e. with attributes and also Nirgun -without attributes (p287; p102). It teaches reincarnation and yet the Guru Granth questions reincarnation(p748 M5; p1366 Kabir). It teaches the concept of hell (p465 M1; p524 M5; p793 Ravidass; p875 Ravidass; p1383 Farid; Asa Kabirji GGS p484). And yet says hell does not exist (p969 Kabir). And it also teaches the mutually exclusive concept of karma & transmigration. If you are born again and again to pay for the sins of previous lives, why the need for hell or heaven? (p686; p156; Rag Malhar M3; Rag Gauri M5) The Guru Granth says neither Hinduism nor Islam has the truth (p329 Kabir; p875 Namdev) and yet says that the opposite (contrary) is also true(p1350 Kabir).Guru Arjun Dev even validates the Vedas (p632 M5). And guru Govind Singh says Allah & Abhek (Ram) are the same and the Koran and Hindu scriptures are the same (Akal Ustat vs 16:86). It claims that there is only one way to God (p920 M3; p1279 M1) and yet the Guru Granth also teaches there are many ways to God (p885 M5.7. It teaches that all humans are children of God ( p1118 M4) yet also says, not all, but only those who love Him are His children (p658 Ravidass). The guru says that he is blind, ignorant and without enlightenment (p696 M4) yet he is called 'guru', which means one who leads from darkness to light. It teaches the existence of Heaven (p718 Namdev; p952 M3) yet the concept of Heaven is rejected(p969 Kabir). It teaches that the world is a dream, an illusion and not real (p740 M5; p1187 M9 p1231 M9)yet guru Nanak says it is real (p463 M1). Guru Arjun Dev claims that he was given supernatural powers (p782 M5) yet guru Nanak, admitted to the Siddh yogis that he performed no miracles(Bhai Gurdas // 1.42/43) The Guru Granth rejects the Vedas (p329 Kabir) yet Guru Arjun Dev validates the Vedas (p632 M5). He also quotes them as though an authority(p632 M5). Guru Nanak also quotes them as though an authority (p831 M1).The fourth guru does the same and quotes them as though an authority (p998 M4). Namdev quotes the Gita as though an authority (p874 Namdev). Ravidass quotes the sage Vyas as though an authority (p658 Ravidass). The Guru Granth says that everything was created by the agency of millions of Brahmas (p1156 M5). Yet the one God created everything ( p1 M1). Dhanna jat is said to have worshipped a stone and God appeared to him. Yet stone worshipping is condemned (p1160 Kabir). Guru Granth gives no account of the creation of man and in fact says the Semitic books are false (p329 Kabir). Yet itself validates the existence of Baba Adam (p1161 Kabir). 13. The Guru Granth teaches that God does not incarnate (p1136 M5) yet talks of the Nehklank Avatar (p1403 Swayyas). 14. The gurus never called themselves divine, but in fact sinners in need of salvation by the Grace of God. (p156 M1; p536 M5; p261 M5; M5 p1301). Yet Swayyas sing praises and laudations to them and make them divine (p1405 Swayyas; p1407 Swayyas; p1408 Swayyas; p1409 Swayyas). 15. It teaches monism i.e. all is one reality and God is all (p846 M5; p464 // M1; p1291 // Malar M1; p131 Majh M5. Yet says that man is not the same essence as God but only resembles Him (p754 Suhi M3).

@@Randomhandlename Yes because it is a mixture of different *Majority* Sub Indian Continent religions such as Islam and Hinduism. So of course you will see one side rejecting something that in another side is accepted, not an ideal religion to follow for Logical standards but full respect to the ones practicing it and being devoted to it 🙌🏻

Not anymore. They're very much extreme & politicised now days. Turning to be like Muslims

@@Randomhandlename now produce the literal non-translated verses from each of the pages that you've scrutinised so that it can be analysed by everyone to confirm whether what you've translated is correct or if its full of errors, incorrectly translated and/or severely out of context. And don't ask us to look it up ourselves - not everyone has a copy of the SGGS.

@@tarjd6796 you’re making a claim that the translation I shared has an error, prove it. The burden of proof is upon the claimant

That is truth bro....that is how this beautiful art passed through generations....🙏🙏

Wrong and wrong. Shaolin is one of many schools of Chinese martial arts that developed independently. Buddhism came to China in first century and Bodhidharma several centuries later. So he was not the one who introduced Buddhism to China.

Agree to slo mo... i just meant bodhidharma was the one to brought some martial arts to china but i do agree that most of the martial arts system of china is its own...he was not the one to introduce buddhism to china,it was already there long ago...thanks

Yeah bodhidharma was a prince of the Pallavas kingdom of south India, back then south India invented and practiced many martial arts. He went to China on a religious mission but after he arrived he taught his disciples martial arts.

@@theloosecannon7517 false, the shaolin monks created and taught shaolin quan or wushu as far back as the 6th century, long before bodhidharma went to China to study. And Chinese wushu became the modern day Kung Fu and tai Chi etc. and karate, tae-quan-do, muay tai etc were created independently in each country. Indians martial arts is a dead art.

Hahahahaha

🤣🤣

Try challenging them. Lets c wat happens.

@@ravinderdhupia4779 perfect bum burger patties, what else..🤣

@@sasnad3 - Grow up.

Not proud but grateful

british loved them sikhs were their loyalist they were promoted to military positions and many of them were made personnel guards to many high ranking British officers and officials they were their lap dogs if i would say who choose to betray their own ken for white masters in the battle of saragarhi where sikh showed so called bravery against the so called invaders in saragrhi were fighting the locals pushtuns who were fighting for their land and these sikh soldiers fought against the locals to save their white masters so dont come here try to show them as brave freedom fighters they never were!!!!!!

@@asimumar2013 coz Sikhs were no Madrasa educated jihadist......bloody beggar terrorist

@@shergill4301 that’s your reponse you are not denying they were serving their white master no respect for people who betrayed their own kin for invaders

@@awannnn9858 yes terrorist...now do wt you can do

Listed are some contradictions in Sikhism : It teaches the contradictory concepts of God being Sargun i.e. with attributes and also Nirgun -without attributes (p287; p102). It teaches reincarnation and yet the Guru Granth questions reincarnation(p748 M5; p1366 Kabir). It teaches the concept of hell (p465 M1; p524 M5; p793 Ravidass; p875 Ravidass; p1383 Farid; Asa Kabirji GGS p484). And yet says hell does not exist (p969 Kabir). And it also teaches the mutually exclusive concept of karma & transmigration. If you are born again and again to pay for the sins of previous lives, why the need for hell or heaven? (p686; p156; Rag Malhar M3; Rag Gauri M5) The Guru Granth says neither Hinduism nor Islam has the truth (p329 Kabir; p875 Namdev) and yet says that the opposite (contrary) is also true(p1350 Kabir).Guru Arjun Dev even validates the Vedas (p632 M5). And guru Govind Singh says Allah & Abhek (Ram) are the same and the Koran and Hindu scriptures are the same (Akal Ustat vs 16:86). It claims that there is only one way to God (p920 M3; p1279 M1) and yet the Guru Granth also teaches there are many ways to God (p885 M5.7. It teaches that all humans are children of God ( p1118 M4) yet also says, not all, but only those who love Him are His children (p658 Ravidass). The guru says that he is blind, ignorant and without enlightenment (p696 M4) yet he is called 'guru', which means one who leads from darkness to light. It teaches the existence of Heaven (p718 Namdev; p952 M3) yet the concept of Heaven is rejected(p969 Kabir). It teaches that the world is a dream, an illusion and not real (p740 M5; p1187 M9 p1231 M9)yet guru Nanak says it is real (p463 M1). Guru Arjun Dev claims that he was given supernatural powers (p782 M5) yet guru Nanak, admitted to the Siddh yogis that he performed no miracles(Bhai Gurdas // 1.42/43) The Guru Granth rejects the Vedas (p329 Kabir) yet Guru Arjun Dev validates the Vedas (p632 M5). He also quotes them as though an authority(p632 M5). Guru Nanak also quotes them as though an authority (p831 M1).The fourth guru does the same and quotes them as though an authority (p998 M4). Namdev quotes the Gita as though an authority (p874 Namdev). Ravidass quotes the sage Vyas as though an authority (p658 Ravidass). The Guru Granth says that everything was created by the agency of millions of Brahmas (p1156 M5). Yet the one God created everything ( p1 M1). Dhanna jat is said to have worshipped a stone and God appeared to him. Yet stone worshipping is condemned (p1160 Kabir). Guru Granth gives no account of the creation of man and in fact says the Semitic books are false (p329 Kabir). Yet itself validates the existence of Baba Adam (p1161 Kabir). 13. The Guru Granth teaches that God does not incarnate (p1136 M5) yet talks of the Nehklank Avatar (p1403 Swayyas). 14. The gurus never called themselves divine, but in fact sinners in need of salvation by the Grace of God. (p156 M1; p536 M5; p261 M5; M5 p1301). Yet Swayyas sing praises and laudations to them and make them divine (p1405 Swayyas; p1407 Swayyas; p1408 Swayyas; p1409 Swayyas). 15. It teaches monism i.e. all is one reality and God is all (p846 M5; p464 // M1; p1291 // Malar M1; p131 Majh M5. Yet says that man is not the same essence as God but only resembles Him (p754 Suhi M3).

@@Randomhandlename now produce the literal non-translated verses from each of the pages that you've scrutinised so that it can be analysed by everyone to confirm whether what you've translated is correct or if its full of errors, incorrectly translated and/or severely out of context. And don't ask us to look it up ourselves - not everyone has a copy of the SGGS.

@@tarjd6796 can you prove the translation is wrong? Here’s one example It teaches the existence of Heaven (p718 Namdev; p952 M3) yet the concept of Heaven is rejected(p969 Kabir). “Prays Naam Dayv, I have become a man of good deeds and good thoughts. Chanting the Lord‟s Name, under Guru‟s Instructions, who has not gone to heaven?” P718 “They may be shown the way, but only a few go there. Without the karma of good actions, heaven is not attained.” P952 “What is hell, and what is heaven? The Saints reject them both. I have no obligation to either of them, by the Grace of my Guru.” P969

@@Randomhandlename Your original argument had nothing to do with proving whether the translations youve listed were wrong. Your original argument was that you believed the verses and passages in the SGGS were contradictory (anyone reading this can search for your original comments in this video). For example in your original comment you mistakenly claimed that the SGGS first promoted the kingdom of heaven in one verse and then rejected it in other verses. In the case of your previous comment I attempt to clear up your misrepresentation as follows. You provided 4 passages that mention the word heaven, in which case you've automatically assumed that the SGGS is talking the literal interpretation of Heave as an abode or a place - the kingdom of Heaven? This defintion of heaven in the literal sense as it being a physical place is typically adopted by those who practice one of the Abrahamic religions (Christianity, Judaism or Islam). The concept of heaven being a heavenly place/abode/kingdom that you visit when you die isn't the defintiion adopted by Dharmic religions (like Sikhism). In Sikhism theres no belief in an afterlife that is heaven or hell that interpreted as a literal place your spirit visits - this is an abrahmic concept popularised by Christianity (the Biblical defintion) and Islam. The Saints of Sikhism reject this notion of Heaven and Hell as a physical concept that you visit beyond death, which is meant to be captured by verse P969 that you presented earlier. Where the word "Heaven" is utilised throughout the passages of the SGGS the meaning takes a completely different interpretation from what you belive or hold it to be due to your own religious ideologies or general beliefs. The mistake you've made is to force your interpretation or ideology of Heaven like a template on to the verses practised by Sikhism, which sadly doesnt fit. The interpretation of heaven according to Sikhism as representated by the first 3 verses you've listed isn't to denote a physical place that one goes to after death, but is the transendence of ones physical and mental being (think of it as an out of body experience) to a higher plane (closer to god), which happens while you are still alive purely through meditation by chanting gods name (Prayer of Naamdev). The Heaven interpreted by the SGGS isn't referring to the place visited beyond the afterlife (interpreted by Abrahamic religions) but is interpreted to mean an internal state of bliss, delight and peace that can be attained by any human being purely by chanting gods name, the inner spirit is moved closer to god through deliberate and sustained chanting and prayer on the name of god. This is a concept that I can image will be hard for you to understand or even acccept, especially if you measure heaven as phsyical abode that is inaccessible to the "non-believers" after death (a typically Christian or Islamic concept that is far removed from Sikhism, Hinduism or Buddhism). What you've done is cherry picked verses from the SGGS that make it strongly suggest that its referring to the heavenly abode beyond afterlife, which is false and a clear example of your misinterpretation of the verses. And this is the mistake you've made and continue to make with all the other pointers you've cherry picked - instead of reading the whole text (from start to finish - something you will never do) you've selectivley targeted verses and quotes from passages to help support your argument becuase you're fully aware that you can skew the actual interpretation this way since it will lack context as you have forced out the bigger picture(to put it another way you're deliberately missing the trees for the forest) Here are additional passages in the SGGS that strongly support and demonstrate the concept of heaven practiced in Sikhism that I just described to you above (Guru Arjan Dev.SGGS:1078) "Myriads of heavens do not equal the Lord's Name." (Guru Arjan Dev.SGGS:890) "Heaven is where the Naam is chanted. All bliss comes, when one obtains the Blessed Vision of the Lord" (SGGS:337) "Don't wish for a home in heaven, and don't be afraid to live in hell. Whatever will be will be, so don't get your hopes up in your mind." (Guru Arjan Dev.SGGS:251) "They do not seek wealth, and they do not desire paradise. They are immersed in the deep love of their Beloved, and the dust of the feet of the Holy."

@@tarjd6796 Yet here you are writing paragraphs with no substance, No one mentioned anything about other beliefs except contradictions from your own religion, how come you can’t refute the contradictions then one by one with explanation? where’s the refutation for contradiction? it confirms heaven and then rejects heaven, hilarious. Wether physical or not or different meaning or not it confirms heaven and then rejects it. Learn what contradiction means You wrote all that for nothing Address the contradictions

Only the good and not bad ? Like caste ?

@@Luke-hm9vh well of course, I don't agree with that system. Most societies have good things we can learn from as well as bad things we can learn to avoid.

Sikhs are supposed to be above caste but unfortunately people seldomly practice what they read. 🙏🏽

​@@Luke-hm9vh hmm all westerns see only negative side of India? Why not good side of India ??

@@Luke-hm9vh we remove the castism

They won't... You know the reason why...

Dream on. Beebeesea is anti- Kryzdian, Izz Rayle, In Doo, Boo Deez & Tau Is. They love peacepeeple, woohoohanpeeple & peacepeeple's offshoot - the sickpeeps

@@dharmapersona2084 yeah😞

@@dharmapersona2084 why?????

@@darkbassi5911 no one will ever know

Or like this, I have seen my sisters fight like this as kids too

@@specialistimran9582 respect the culture. Please. It does take practice and devotion to fight with those swords and weapons. What you see about martial arts or sword fighting in films is staged to look appealing, this is raw martial arts

It's your loss if someone brings gun to this fight. All your martial art will be air in two minutes

@@daniyalbbd5281 yeah but there's no skill, bravery in drawing a gun to a sword fight? It's something a coward would do

@@santbhindranwalejidefanche8767 yeah keep being brave lmao , the one who survives will decide the future. You're brave but in grave lmao

british loved them sikhs were their loyalist they were promoted to military positions and many of them were made personnel guards to many high ranking British officers and officials they were their lap dogs if i would say who choose to betray their own ken for white masters in the battle of saragarhi where sikh showed so called bravery against the so called invaders in saragrhi were fighting the locals pushtuns who were fighting for their land and these sikh soldiers fought against the locals to save their white masters so dont come here try to show them as brave freedom fighters they never were!!!!!!

Gurkha bro, respect

it's Gorkha not Gurkha

Sasriyakaal!

Much respect to the powerful Gurkas who keep our borders secure 🙏

We are thankful to the south Indian Hindus who have preserved the basics of sanatan Dharma including the continuing use of Sanskrit language and martial arts. ❤

An amazing account, thank you.

All those forms were there during the Gurukaal, sikh-mughal battles,Sikh-afgan battles,Anglo-sikh wars until 1860-1870 in this battle art but today it is mostly a demonstrative art, very few people are masters in that actual art.

@@rp7159 South Indian Hindus preserved a lot. Am grateful 🙏🏻

@@je57 😊❤

Listed are some contradictions in Sikhism : It teaches the contradictory concepts of God being Sargun i.e. with attributes and also Nirgun -without attributes (p287; p102). It teaches reincarnation and yet the Guru Granth questions reincarnation(p748 M5; p1366 Kabir). It teaches the concept of hell (p465 M1; p524 M5; p793 Ravidass; p875 Ravidass; p1383 Farid; Asa Kabirji GGS p484). And yet says hell does not exist (p969 Kabir). And it also teaches the mutually exclusive concept of karma & transmigration. If you are born again and again to pay for the sins of previous lives, why the need for hell or heaven? (p686; p156; Rag Malhar M3; Rag Gauri M5) The Guru Granth says neither Hinduism nor Islam has the truth (p329 Kabir; p875 Namdev) and yet says that the opposite (contrary) is also true(p1350 Kabir).Guru Arjun Dev even validates the Vedas (p632 M5). And guru Govind Singh says Allah & Abhek (Ram) are the same and the Koran and Hindu scriptures are the same (Akal Ustat vs 16:86). It claims that there is only one way to God (p920 M3; p1279 M1) and yet the Guru Granth also teaches there are many ways to God (p885 M5.7. It teaches that all humans are children of God ( p1118 M4) yet also says, not all, but only those who love Him are His children (p658 Ravidass). The guru says that he is blind, ignorant and without enlightenment (p696 M4) yet he is called 'guru', which means one who leads from darkness to light. It teaches the existence of Heaven (p718 Namdev; p952 M3) yet the concept of Heaven is rejected(p969 Kabir). It teaches that the world is a dream, an illusion and not real (p740 M5; p1187 M9 p1231 M9)yet guru Nanak says it is real (p463 M1). Guru Arjun Dev claims that he was given supernatural powers (p782 M5) yet guru Nanak, admitted to the Siddh yogis that he performed no miracles(Bhai Gurdas // 1.42/43) The Guru Granth rejects the Vedas (p329 Kabir) yet Guru Arjun Dev validates the Vedas (p632 M5). He also quotes them as though an authority(p632 M5). Guru Nanak also quotes them as though an authority (p831 M1).The fourth guru does the same and quotes them as though an authority (p998 M4). Namdev quotes the Gita as though an authority (p874 Namdev). Ravidass quotes the sage Vyas as though an authority (p658 Ravidass). The Guru Granth says that everything was created by the agency of millions of Brahmas (p1156 M5). Yet the one God created everything ( p1 M1). Dhanna jat is said to have worshipped a stone and God appeared to him. Yet stone worshipping is condemned (p1160 Kabir). Guru Granth gives no account of the creation of man and in fact says the Semitic books are false (p329 Kabir). Yet itself validates the existence of Baba Adam (p1161 Kabir). 13. The Guru Granth teaches that God does not incarnate (p1136 M5) yet talks of the Nehklank Avatar (p1403 Swayyas). 14. The gurus never called themselves divine, but in fact sinners in need of salvation by the Grace of God. (p156 M1; p536 M5; p261 M5; M5 p1301). Yet Swayyas sing praises and laudations to them and make them divine (p1405 Swayyas; p1407 Swayyas; p1408 Swayyas; p1409 Swayyas). 15. It teaches monism i.e. all is one reality and God is all (p846 M5; p464 // M1; p1291 // Malar M1; p131 Majh M5. Yet says that man is not the same essence as God but only resembles Him (p754 Suhi M3).

@@Randomhandlename now produce the literal non-translated verses from each of the pages that you've scrutinised so that it can be analysed by everyone to confirm whether what you've translated is correct or if its full of errors, incorrectly translated and/or severely out of context. And don't ask us to look it up ourselves - not everyone has a copy of the SGGS.

@@tarjd6796 can you prove the translation is wrong? Here’s one example It teaches the existence of Heaven (p718 Namdev; p952 M3) yet the concept of Heaven is rejected(p969 Kabir). “Prays Naam Dayv, I have become a man of good deeds and good thoughts. Chanting the Lord‟s Name, under Guru‟s Instructions, who has not gone to heaven?” P718 “They may be shown the way, but only a few go there. Without the karma of good actions, heaven is not attained.” P952 “What is hell, and what is heaven? The Saints reject them both. I have no obligation to either of them, by the Grace of my Guru.” P969

U know there is a prophecy that when white people become khalsa then there will be one world order…..and i think inspite of modern weapons the only reason Americans, soviets and British had to withdraw from central Asia and India is because they are not willing to accept the reality and culture of our land….if u want our land u should become one of us…

@@SSingh-mr9yt let him live according to his choice don't behave like missionary or muslim forcing someone to accept different religion

@@mohitsingh5665 its not called forcing….my family used to be hindu 2-3 generations back….we faced a situation to either become muslims or sikh……we chose sikh….u just wait…. if u live in India in state other than bengal or punjab…..u will face the same situation when modi loses and there will be lawlessness everywhere……u will be left with a choice to either become muslim or sikh……..and if u choose to stay hindu then u will have to give taxes and ur daughter or sister to muslims in order to save yourself from difficulties and lawlessness………..historically speaking all the muslims in India didn’t come from outside. They were hindus and had to face the same situation of lawlessness and helplessness so they made their choices…let’s see what u will choose…

@@SSingh-mr9yt I'm a sikh....but I don't got to streets trying to convert people like you doing here also Punjab is also not doing very good in development where sikh are in majority they fight with each other on petty issues

@@mohitsingh5665 i am sorry i think u misunderstood ….by sikh i mean khalsa…..are u a khalsa? Looking at your dp I don’t think u are…

Yes, the origin of all

Hope to see a demo. Thanks 👍🏻

We call the founder who came from Karale, Da Mo. Founded martial arts in China

We have Kaalari in Sydney & its open to everyone, Whites, Atheists, Chinese, Christians, Hindus, Muslims etc. It's not an ethno-religious art form.

In France we have Savate but I like what I see in Kelaari. Very difficult to attain proficiency. I especially like that flexible sword that looks like a cross between a whip & a sword

Only he could do that.

Don't use words like Khalsa because it reminds of Khalistan (communal word that calls for separation).

our 6th guru learned the shaster vidya from two snatanis name as rao jaito and rao madho both were rajput kshtriyas, and stop dividing same culture and religioun into two. what we call sikhs today have nothing new everything was prevelant from thousand of years in snatan dharm .gurus never told us that now you are a different breed from others they have just ended the fake superstitious practices which corrupted brhamins started to make lineage and there control.

@@desiputtar89 The meaning of the word' khalsa' is ' pure' . If some people misuse a word ,it is not the fault of the word. And there are many ,many Sikhs who are not Khalistanis.

@@anmoldeepsingh3536 very right said by you veere many beer don't understand this. Par rabb di meher. Buddhi day loka nu.

@@desiputtar89 khalsa means sikh . In the army sikh soldiers are called Khalsa .

British were disciplined and cunning.

You do understand that there was no 'India' before the British. It was a collection of kingdoms, divided along linguistic lines, each trying to conquer the other, much like Europe.

@@kunalroy2712 you are right but it was also the incompetency of the mughal rule.

no, this is what happens when you think waving a weapon around theatrically is a martial art.

@@kunalroy2712 not entirely correct. Apart from the civilizational unity, the Maratha empire was pretty dominant in the late 18th century. It was only after Panipat 3.0 that they were weakened but nevertheless still were quite powerful.

Listed are some contradictions in Sikhism : It teaches the contradictory concepts of God being Sargun i.e. with attributes and also Nirgun -without attributes (p287; p102). It teaches reincarnation and yet the Guru Granth questions reincarnation(p748 M5; p1366 Kabir). It teaches the concept of hell (p465 M1; p524 M5; p793 Ravidass; p875 Ravidass; p1383 Farid; Asa Kabirji GGS p484). And yet says hell does not exist (p969 Kabir). And it also teaches the mutually exclusive concept of karma & transmigration. If you are born again and again to pay for the sins of previous lives, why the need for hell or heaven? (p686; p156; Rag Malhar M3; Rag Gauri M5) The Guru Granth says neither Hinduism nor Islam has the truth (p329 Kabir; p875 Namdev) and yet says that the opposite (contrary) is also true(p1350 Kabir).Guru Arjun Dev even validates the Vedas (p632 M5). And guru Govind Singh says Allah & Abhek (Ram) are the same and the Koran and Hindu scriptures are the same (Akal Ustat vs 16:86). It claims that there is only one way to God (p920 M3; p1279 M1) and yet the Guru Granth also teaches there are many ways to God (p885 M5.7. It teaches that all humans are children of God ( p1118 M4) yet also says, not all, but only those who love Him are His children (p658 Ravidass). The guru says that he is blind, ignorant and without enlightenment (p696 M4) yet he is called 'guru', which means one who leads from darkness to light. It teaches the existence of Heaven (p718 Namdev; p952 M3) yet the concept of Heaven is rejected(p969 Kabir). It teaches that the world is a dream, an illusion and not real (p740 M5; p1187 M9 p1231 M9)yet guru Nanak says it is real (p463 M1). Guru Arjun Dev claims that he was given supernatural powers (p782 M5) yet guru Nanak, admitted to the Siddh yogis that he performed no miracles(Bhai Gurdas // 1.42/43) The Guru Granth rejects the Vedas (p329 Kabir) yet Guru Arjun Dev validates the Vedas (p632 M5). He also quotes them as though an authority(p632 M5). Guru Nanak also quotes them as though an authority (p831 M1).The fourth guru does the same and quotes them as though an authority (p998 M4). Namdev quotes the Gita as though an authority (p874 Namdev). Ravidass quotes the sage Vyas as though an authority (p658 Ravidass). The Guru Granth says that everything was created by the agency of millions of Brahmas (p1156 M5). Yet the one God created everything ( p1 M1). Dhanna jat is said to have worshipped a stone and God appeared to him. Yet stone worshipping is condemned (p1160 Kabir). Guru Granth gives no account of the creation of man and in fact says the Semitic books are false (p329 Kabir). Yet itself validates the existence of Baba Adam (p1161 Kabir). 13. The Guru Granth teaches that God does not incarnate (p1136 M5) yet talks of the Nehklank Avatar (p1403 Swayyas). 14. The gurus never called themselves divine, but in fact sinners in need of salvation by the Grace of God. (p156 M1; p536 M5; p261 M5; M5 p1301). Yet Swayyas sing praises and laudations to them and make them divine (p1405 Swayyas; p1407 Swayyas; p1408 Swayyas; p1409 Swayyas). 15. It teaches monism i.e. all is one reality and God is all (p846 M5; p464 // M1; p1291 // Malar M1; p131 Majh M5. Yet says that man is not the same essence as God but only resembles Him (p754 Suhi M3).

@@Randomhandlename now produce the literal non-translated verses from each of the pages that you've scrutinised so that it can be analysed by everyone to confirm whether what you've translated is correct or if its full of errors, incorrectly translated and/or severely out of context. And don't ask us to look it up ourselves - not everyone has a copy of the SGGS.

@@tarjd6796 can you prove the translation is wrong? Here’s one example It teaches the existence of Heaven (p718 Namdev; p952 M3) yet the concept of Heaven is rejected(p969 Kabir). “Prays Naam Dayv, I have become a man of good deeds and good thoughts. Chanting the Lord‟s Name, under Guru‟s Instructions, who has not gone to heaven?” P718 “They may be shown the way, but only a few go there. Without the karma of good actions, heaven is not attained.” P952 “What is hell, and what is heaven? The Saints reject them both. I have no obligation to either of them, by the Grace of my Guru.” P969

@@Randomhandlename the person who is blessed by the almighty is free from heaven and hell. The existence is not denied.

@@sukhdeepvirk2648 your book literally confirms heaven and hell then rejects it

Sikhs are part of sanatan

@@PrithaBhowmick-cb1cz Yes i know

british loved them sikhs were their loyalist they were promoted to military positions and many of them were made personnel guards to many high ranking British officers and officials they were their lap dogs if i would say who choose to betray their own ken for white masters in the battle of saragarhi where sikh showed so called bravery against the so called invaders in saragrhi were fighting the locals pushtuns who were fighting for their land and these sikh soldiers fought against the locals to save their white masters so dont come here try to show them as brave freedom fighters they never were!!!!!!

Listed are some contradictions in Sikhism : It teaches the contradictory concepts of God being Sargun i.e. with attributes and also Nirgun -without attributes (p287; p102). It teaches reincarnation and yet the Guru Granth questions reincarnation(p748 M5; p1366 Kabir). It teaches the concept of hell (p465 M1; p524 M5; p793 Ravidass; p875 Ravidass; p1383 Farid; Asa Kabirji GGS p484). And yet says hell does not exist (p969 Kabir). And it also teaches the mutually exclusive concept of karma & transmigration. If you are born again and again to pay for the sins of previous lives, why the need for hell or heaven? (p686; p156; Rag Malhar M3; Rag Gauri M5) The Guru Granth says neither Hinduism nor Islam has the truth (p329 Kabir; p875 Namdev) and yet says that the opposite (contrary) is also true(p1350 Kabir).Guru Arjun Dev even validates the Vedas (p632 M5). And guru Govind Singh says Allah & Abhek (Ram) are the same and the Koran and Hindu scriptures are the same (Akal Ustat vs 16:86). It claims that there is only one way to God (p920 M3; p1279 M1) and yet the Guru Granth also teaches there are many ways to God (p885 M5.7. It teaches that all humans are children of God ( p1118 M4) yet also says, not all, but only those who love Him are His children (p658 Ravidass). The guru says that he is blind, ignorant and without enlightenment (p696 M4) yet he is called 'guru', which means one who leads from darkness to light. It teaches the existence of Heaven (p718 Namdev; p952 M3) yet the concept of Heaven is rejected(p969 Kabir). It teaches that the world is a dream, an illusion and not real (p740 M5; p1187 M9 p1231 M9)yet guru Nanak says it is real (p463 M1). Guru Arjun Dev claims that he was given supernatural powers (p782 M5) yet guru Nanak, admitted to the Siddh yogis that he performed no miracles(Bhai Gurdas // 1.42/43) The Guru Granth rejects the Vedas (p329 Kabir) yet Guru Arjun Dev validates the Vedas (p632 M5). He also quotes them as though an authority(p632 M5). Guru Nanak also quotes them as though an authority (p831 M1).The fourth guru does the same and quotes them as though an authority (p998 M4). Namdev quotes the Gita as though an authority (p874 Namdev). Ravidass quotes the sage Vyas as though an authority (p658 Ravidass). The Guru Granth says that everything was created by the agency of millions of Brahmas (p1156 M5). Yet the one God created everything ( p1 M1). Dhanna jat is said to have worshipped a stone and God appeared to him. Yet stone worshipping is condemned (p1160 Kabir). Guru Granth gives no account of the creation of man and in fact says the Semitic books are false (p329 Kabir). Yet itself validates the existence of Baba Adam (p1161 Kabir). 13. The Guru Granth teaches that God does not incarnate (p1136 M5) yet talks of the Nehklank Avatar (p1403 Swayyas). 14. The gurus never called themselves divine, but in fact sinners in need of salvation by the Grace of God. (p156 M1; p536 M5; p261 M5; M5 p1301). Yet Swayyas sing praises and laudations to them and make them divine (p1405 Swayyas; p1407 Swayyas; p1408 Swayyas; p1409 Swayyas). 15. It teaches monism i.e. all is one reality and God is all (p846 M5; p464 // M1; p1291 // Malar M1; p131 Majh M5. Yet says that man is not the same essence as God but only resembles Him (p754 Suhi M3).

@@Randomhandlename now produce the literal non-translated verses (in its original format) from each of the pages that you've scrutinised so that it can be analysed by everyone to confirm whether what you've translated is correct or if its full of errors, incorrectly translated and/or severely out of context. And don't ask us to look it up ourselves - not everyone has a copy of the SGGS.

Tamil nadu also 💪

That's why Travancore & Kochi were never conquered

Southern Karnataka as well where for centuries we had to fight off foreign merchants

@@williamwang8352 Our sailors started Savate (French Kickboxing) but we have klaripayatu in France as well 👍🏻

All u secular cucks of the south

Listed are some contradictions in Sikhism : It teaches the contradictory concepts of God being Sargun i.e. with attributes and also Nirgun -without attributes (p287; p102). It teaches reincarnation and yet the Guru Granth questions reincarnation(p748 M5; p1366 Kabir). It teaches the concept of hell (p465 M1; p524 M5; p793 Ravidass; p875 Ravidass; p1383 Farid; Asa Kabirji GGS p484). And yet says hell does not exist (p969 Kabir). And it also teaches the mutually exclusive concept of karma & transmigration. If you are born again and again to pay for the sins of previous lives, why the need for hell or heaven? (p686; p156; Rag Malhar M3; Rag Gauri M5) The Guru Granth says neither Hinduism nor Islam has the truth (p329 Kabir; p875 Namdev) and yet says that the opposite (contrary) is also true(p1350 Kabir).Guru Arjun Dev even validates the Vedas (p632 M5). And guru Govind Singh says Allah & Abhek (Ram) are the same and the Koran and Hindu scriptures are the same (Akal Ustat vs 16:86). It claims that there is only one way to God (p920 M3; p1279 M1) and yet the Guru Granth also teaches there are many ways to God (p885 M5.7. It teaches that all humans are children of God ( p1118 M4) yet also says, not all, but only those who love Him are His children (p658 Ravidass). The guru says that he is blind, ignorant and without enlightenment (p696 M4) yet he is called 'guru', which means one who leads from darkness to light. It teaches the existence of Heaven (p718 Namdev; p952 M3) yet the concept of Heaven is rejected(p969 Kabir). It teaches that the world is a dream, an illusion and not real (p740 M5; p1187 M9 p1231 M9)yet guru Nanak says it is real (p463 M1). Guru Arjun Dev claims that he was given supernatural powers (p782 M5) yet guru Nanak, admitted to the Siddh yogis that he performed no miracles(Bhai Gurdas // 1.42/43) The Guru Granth rejects the Vedas (p329 Kabir) yet Guru Arjun Dev validates the Vedas (p632 M5). He also quotes them as though an authority(p632 M5). Guru Nanak also quotes them as though an authority (p831 M1).The fourth guru does the same and quotes them as though an authority (p998 M4). Namdev quotes the Gita as though an authority (p874 Namdev). Ravidass quotes the sage Vyas as though an authority (p658 Ravidass). The Guru Granth says that everything was created by the agency of millions of Brahmas (p1156 M5). Yet the one God created everything ( p1 M1). Dhanna jat is said to have worshipped a stone and God appeared to him. Yet stone worshipping is condemned (p1160 Kabir). Guru Granth gives no account of the creation of man and in fact says the Semitic books are false (p329 Kabir). Yet itself validates the existence of Baba Adam (p1161 Kabir). 13. The Guru Granth teaches that God does not incarnate (p1136 M5) yet talks of the Nehklank Avatar (p1403 Swayyas). 14. The gurus never called themselves divine, but in fact sinners in need of salvation by the Grace of God. (p156 M1; p536 M5; p261 M5; M5 p1301). Yet Swayyas sing praises and laudations to them and make them divine (p1405 Swayyas; p1407 Swayyas; p1408 Swayyas; p1409 Swayyas). 15. It teaches monism i.e. all is one reality and God is all (p846 M5; p464 // M1; p1291 // Malar M1; p131 Majh M5. Yet says that man is not the same essence as God but only resembles Him (p754 Suhi M3).

@@Randomhandlename now produce the literal non-translated verses from each of the pages that you've scrutinised so that it can be analysed by everyone to confirm whether what you've translated is correct or if its full of errors, incorrectly translated and/or severely out of context. And don't ask us to look it up ourselves - not everyone has a copy of the SGGS.

@@tarjd6796 can you prove the translation is wrong? Here’s one example It teaches the existence of Heaven (p718 Namdev; p952 M3) yet the concept of Heaven is rejected(p969 Kabir). “Prays Naam Dayv, I have become a man of good deeds and good thoughts. Chanting the Lord‟s Name, under Guru‟s Instructions, who has not gone to heaven?” P718 “They may be shown the way, but only a few go there. Without the karma of good actions, heaven is not attained.” P952 “What is hell, and what is heaven? The Saints reject them both. I have no obligation to either of them, by the Grace of my Guru.” P969

These are martial arts of present day Keralam. Now popularly known as vadakkan(northern)Kalaripayattu, madhya(central) Kalaripayattu and thekkan(southern)Kalaripayattu....

Miri and piri in Sikhism are also kinda like witcher swords. One's for spiritual authority and the other is temporal authority

Truth.

@@vander1773 sure, ok...where's the arrow and crossbow type of weapon? At least atlatl has been known for centuries

Martial arts are as much art as cold combat skills to a culture. Look at it through this lens. By practicing these advanced techniques and exerting maneouvers, it's a type of physical conditioning and establishing muscle memory for fluid usage during battle. Like katas in karate or tae kwon do, the techniques are meaningless without ALREADY knowing how to fight. No one in the UFC fights with pure theoretical technique according to the martial arts they trained in, for example. Furthermore, in this era, combat occured in short bursts of contact and withdrawl, on repeat. No formation could be in continuous hand-to-hand combat for more than a few minutes at a time due simply to fatigue and the need to regroup formations. By having your warriors be especially ferocious and agile, you could rely on each short window of opportunity to intimidate and outperform your opponents.

@@vander1773 The British defeated the Sikhs in just 2 wars. So what is there to fear? Then the Sikhs supported the British by helping the Brits quell the Indian Uprising of 1857 like good guard dogs. Keralites are the true warriors with Kalari Payat, musket, cannon & navy. They are the unconquered people of India. Especially Travancore (1729 - 1949). Travancore defeated the Dutch, Spanish, Portuguese, Arabs & Tippu. Kerala was the gateway to India for traders from the West & Middle East for 2000 years & yet for 2000 years nobody conquered it. The only entity to conquer Kerala was the Indian Union in '49. All boys went into the Kalaris (Clan Training Areas) from age 6 & women handled the estates & inherited property because the men were in constant battle away from home. If not with foreigners, then Kalari would be fighting Kalari. They were the real samurais of India. Marthanda Varma Maharaj ki Jai! 🕉🇮🇳 (Tiny Sikh 'Empire lasted 50 years & was defeated & dissolved. Pride begets a fall. Egoistic boasters need factual slaps to wake them up from their reverie & concocted fantasies. Especially Canadian & British Sikhs. Gatka is just a modern revival of a loser's 'martial arts'. I also salute the Marathi people for not being boastful although they possessed the largest empire India ever produced. Har Har Mahadev! 🙏🏻)

@@vander1773 Agreed. I've got nothing against the Brits. Other than British Malabar which they took possession of, when they defeated Tippu, they never invaded Travancore & left it as the last remaining independent state in India. Also in British Malabar, the Brits treated the people well. I've no complaints.

british loved them sikhs were their loyalist they were promoted to military positions and many of them were made personnel guards to many high ranking British officers and officials they were their lap dogs if i would say who choose to betray their own ken for white masters in the battle of saragarhi where sikh showed so called bravery against the so called invaders in saragrhi were fighting the locals pushtuns who were fighting for their land and these sikh soldiers fought against the locals to save their white masters so dont come here try to show them as brave freedom fighters they never were!!!!!!

@@asimumar2013 listen retard there was more Muslims in the British army than there was Sikhs. Funny people only think of the Sikhs at war because A they are the more visible and B they was the better fighter. Afghan was Dharmic land and Buddhist before invading conquering Islam wasn't it Mr Khan you numpty

@@g.a.m.b.i people who were living there were Pashtuns they were fighting for their lands against the British you numb skull and skikh aided the British against the locals so know some history

@@awannnn9858 looool why are your deleting your replies Mr Khan, That's Darmich Land them Pashtuns needs to flee back to the Caucass Mountains

@@awannnn9858 Pakistan aids Britian and America looooool hypocrites

@@yahaha3339 thanks for spreading nonsense hate for sikhs and spewing hate for others now get lost

@@yahaha3339 kirpan is of sikhs Gurkha use khukhri, if u had eyes you could have seen it

@Hammer Head no they aren't are you blind, they are Sikhs 😂 get your eyesight tested

@Hammer Head is that why Sikhs held off +10000 mughals is that why there are proportionally higher Sikhs in army than other religions.... exactly

@@santbhindranwalejidefanche8767 Btw, Kerala produces 4% of Air Force Officers but Sikhs/Punjab only produces 1.7%. Additionally, Kerala produces 11% of Naval Officers but Sikhs/Punjab only 3.8%. Kerala is such a small state, you know & Keralites dislike being Jawans. Regarding Jawans in the Army - UP is first, followed by Maharastra, Rajasthan & lastly Sikhs/Punjab. These numbers were collated by the Rajya Sabha (2021) based on a question tabled for discussion. The data did not separate officers & Jawans in the Army & combined them together. The data focussed on Air Force & Naval Officers & recruitment challenges. Total Army Officers for all Indian States combined is 56k. The Army also has challenges recruiting Officers but not as bad as what the Air Force & Navy are facing. Hence the Rajya Sabha question. The Indian Armed Forces otherwise, does not do a state by state breakdown. So I dont know where these Canadian & Brieesh Khalistanis got their inflated numbers of 'Sikhs' serving in the Armed Forces. I salute all my Indian brothers & sisters except for those empty vessels, the Canadian & Brit Khalistanis. Facts dont care for feelings.

The British defeated the Sikhs in just 2 wars. So what is there to fear? Then the Sikhs supported the British by helping the Brits quell the Indian Uprising of 1857 like good guard dogs. Keralites are the true warriors with Kalari Payat, musket, cannon & navy. They are the unconquered people of India. Especially Travancore (1729 - 1949). Travancore defeated the Dutch, Spanish, Portuguese, Arabs & Tippu. Kerala was the gateway to India for traders from the West & Middle East for 2000 years & yet for 2000 years nobody conquered it. The only entity to conquer Kerala was the Indian Union in '49. All boys went into the Kalaris (Clan Training Areas) from age 6 & women handled the estates & inherited property because the men were in constant battle away from home. If not with foreigners, then Kalari would be fighting Kalari. They were the real samurais of India. Marthanda Varma Maharaj ki Jai! 🕉🇮🇳 (Tiny Sikh 'Empire lasted 50 years & was defeated & dissolved. Pride begets a fall. Egoistic boasters need factual slaps to wake them up from their reverie & concocted fantasies. Especially Canadian & British Sikhs. Gatka is just a modern revival of a loser's 'martial arts'. I also salute the Marathi people for not being boastful although they possessed the largest empire India ever produced. Har Har Mahadev! 🙏🏻)

@@yahaha3339 Yet you don't have the heart to say that in real life to a singh or in a gurdware or in punjab ? Blakies don't have much jigra I see

The British defeated the Sikhs in just 2 wars. So what is there to fear? Then the Sikhs supported the British by helping the Brits quell the Indian Uprising of 1857 like good guard dogs. Keralites are the true warriors with Kalari Payat, musket, cannon & navy. They are the unconquered people of India. Especially Travancore (1729 - 1949). Travancore defeated the Dutch, Spanish, Portuguese, Arabs & Tippu. Kerala was the gateway to India for traders from the West & Middle East for 2000 years & yet for 2000 years nobody conquered it. The only entity to conquer Kerala was the Indian Union in '49. All boys went into the Kalaris (Clan Training Areas) from age 6 & women handled the estates & inherited property because the men were in constant battle away from home. If not with foreigners, then Kalari would be fighting Kalari. They were the real samurais of India. Marthanda Varma Maharaj ki Jai! 🕉🇮🇳 (Tiny Sikh 'Empire lasted 50 years & was defeated & dissolved. Pride begets a fall. Egoistic boasters need factual slaps to wake them up from their reverie & concocted fantasies. Especially Canadian & British Sikhs. Gatka is just a modern revival of a loser's 'martial arts'. I also salute the Marathi people for not being boastful although they possessed the largest empire India ever produced. Har Har Mahadev! 🙏🏻)

Our own people hate us more than the foreigners. The Tamiles , Hindus and rajputs just claiming credit and the britishers calling it a dance when in reality they don't even know a drop of history that the nihangs were feared by their own British troops.

Not only male but everyone.

@@amritpalSINGH6251 I meant as a mandatory I wholeheartedly believe women would benefit too but realistically speaking having mandatory martial arts be teachers in schools for males is easier to implement as most women don't really like this sort of fitness discipline

Keralites are the true warriors with Kalari Payat, musket, cannon & navy. They are the unconquered people of India. Especially Travancore (1729 - 1949). Travancore defeated the Dutch, Spanish, Portuguese, Arabs & Tippu. Kerala was the gateway to India for traders from the West & Middle East for 2000 years & yet for 2000 years nobody conquered it. The only entity to conquer Kerala was the Indian Union in '49. All boys went into the Kalaris (Clan Training Areas) from age 6 & women handled the estates & inherited property because the men were in constant battle away from home. If not with foreigners, then Kalari would be fighting Kalari. They were the real samurais of India. Marthanda Varma Maharaj ki Jai! 🕉🇮🇳 (Tiny Sikh 'Empire lasted 50 years & was defeated & dissolved. Pride begets a fall. Egoistic boasters need factual slaps to wake them up from their reverie & concocted fantasies. Especially Canadian & British Sikhs. Gatka is just a modern revival of a loser's 'martial arts'. I also salute the Marathi people for not being boastful although they possessed the largest empire India ever produced. Har Har Mahadev! 🙏🏻)

@@yahaha3339 tldr

💩

A bit of wrong translation in the subtitles. Replace AVENGE word with BRING JUSTICE TO SOMEONE.

The British defeated the Sikhs in just 2 wars. So what is there to fear? Then the Sikhs supported the British by helping the Brits quell the Indian Uprising of 1857 like good guard dogs. Keralites are the true warriors with Kalari Payat, musket, cannon & navy. They are the unconquered people of India. Especially Travancore (1729 - 1949). Travancore defeated the Dutch, Spanish, Portuguese, Arabs & Tippu. Kerala was the gateway to India for traders from the West & Middle East for 2000 years & yet for 2000 years nobody conquered it. The only entity to conquer Kerala was the Indian Union in '49. All boys went into the Kalaris (Clan Training Areas) from age 6 & women handled the estates & inherited property because the men were in constant battle away from home. If not with foreigners, then Kalari would be fighting Kalari. They were the real samurais of India. Marthanda Varma Maharaj ki Jai! 🕉🇮🇳 (Tiny Sikh 'Empire lasted 50 years & was defeated & dissolved. Pride begets a fall. Egoistic boasters need factual slaps to wake them up from their reverie & concocted fantasies. Especially Canadian & British Sikhs. Gatka is just a modern revival of a loser's 'martial arts'. I also salute the Marathi people for not being boastful although they possessed the largest empire India ever produced. Har Har Mahadev! 🙏🏻)

@@yahaha3339 you are right. But they were "bought" by the British by recruiting them to "guard" their own people.

Indeed. Our, Malayali, arts are open to all. Take the blueprint & modify to suit your own defensive needs 🙏🏻

Similar to coastal southern Karnataka & Coorg which shares a border with Kerala

@@williamwang8352 Sydney is on the coast too & we have a Kalari gym

@@yahaha3339 indeed " I am an overproud south indian who knows who history before 1700's" .

No, Gatka is its own martial art given by the sixth Guru.

Hah. Search battle of challianwala. Sikhs were undequipped and had only 10,000. British had modern force and 20,000. And guess who won? The Sikhs! This battle is still the bloodiest battle fought by British on Indian soil. This time Sikhs didn't have lal singh and teja singh who would take away gunpowder and their forces from the battlefield when sikhs would start winning the battle. That is why. Sikhs didn't face treachery in this battle that is why they won. British only won on sikh empire because of treachery

@@gursimarsingh5505 Sikhs are good storytellers, tall tales particularly. Sikhs defeated Hitler, Mussolini, Hirohito, blah, blah, blah. You sound desperate for accolades. You lost. Get over it.

@@krishnamurti2436 yeah, Wikipedia is a site where we see Sikh war ballads not the information right? Second anglo sikh wars were all a imagination and the only war was only world War 2 right? And also, where did we say this all that Hilter and hirohito nonsense? What kind of hypocrite you are. First yourself exaggerated the things and impose on us that we say like this. Wow. Get a life.

Punjab was the last province British managed to capture because of Sikhs presence there

@@krishnamurti2436 why you yourself make events and then impose on us Sikhs that we say? You are not other than another person who only spreads hate for the sikhs because people consider them good.

Sikhs had guns too this was used against Islamic invaders before guns were widespread

@@johnguy25 yes before guns were widespread but the facts are they wouldn't be able to defend as the British had connons guns etc

Wrong

@@Optimistic_mind441 lop no

nope, it isn't the oldest

@@anirudh177 do you think anyone will believe your stupid answer brat

@@Bringmorehoes you can continue believing your fantasies if you want to, I don't care. Calling Kalari the oldest is a joke. The oldest martial arts was some form of boxing and wrestling in Bronze Age Egypt and Sumeria. The oldest Indian martial art is Malla-Yuddha in north India.

which Sikh Guru? I don't see any interaction of our Gurus with Kerla. So please enlighten me.

Rajputs were a part of Sikhs Khalsa was created after that so before Khalsa panth all the Rajputs and Punjabi fought together with guru hence we are brother

Average Hindu trying to take credit with no proof

@@user-cq8hw3ni7g Classic Hindu nationalist inferiority complex. They need to peddle fake history to feel better.

@Ex Christian khus average mughal blood hindu

@Ex Christian khus rajput laughing their Graves after giving their sisters to muslim mughals and creating lakhs of Muslims rajputs

Chakkra

Da Mo of Krala, India founded our Shaolin schools

Who are these people

Our own Indians hate us more than foreigners . When we see a video about kalari we appreciate their art , but when tamilians watch .. .these comments man . Just heart breaking. There is a keralite with name yahaya spreading hate towards sikh and these tamilians instead of stopping encourage him. On the other hands are our " brother" rajputs and cow belt area Hindus who just can't see a sikh martial art at display without jealousy or hate . Finally the Edgy western kids and New age British who don't even have a drop of knowledge about sikh martial arts and battles, even when their own British troops write about the horror and fear they faced in battle field with sikhs . Few Muslims ( Pakistanis too ) who just can't accept the fact the sikhs exist . Mughal bootlickers. On the opposite side is Our Sikhs who care and appreciate everyone's relehiosn and cultures , accepts everyone equally despot being small in numbers . Indeed everyone w hates us . Just disheartened to read the comment as a sikh.

Why do people have to be ignorant when martial arts are in discussion

No but when u are out of bullets then these swords are really helpful

There’s a massive difference in discipline through tradition and preservation of a martial art & being armed with modern weapons. Most Europeans have lost touch with their traditional fighting styles. Sikhs carry guns, don’t be ignorant lol

It is ceremonial today, back then it was as hardcore as today's MMA.